Translate this page
Holocaust Or Hoax? - The Global Warming Debate Heats Up
By Leland Lehrman
26th April 2007
I've watched the global warming debate with one rather confused eye for years. As an active environmentalist and ecologist, I recognize that humankind's actions have often verged on the collectively sado-masochistic, with Mother Earth and Her creatures often bearing the worst of the pain. I am not predisposed to believe in the infallibility of the human species, nor that technology is always good; quite the contrary. In fact, I am extremely environmentally sensitive, with an acute personal awareness and susceptibility to pollution, pesticide and harmful food products.
For some time, it was vogue to talk about climate change, rather than global warming, as warming was apparently not provable. And there is abundant evidence that climate change over the eons has destroyed civilizations, sunken continents and created new ones. Indigenous and ancient prophecy suggesting that Mother Earth or God may be consciously involved with such cleansing operations does not strike me as implausible. And yet, recently, I decided that hoping Mother Earth will simply wash away the pestilence of human civilization would throw out the baby with the bath water. I am a firm believer in the political solution, and will leave divine intervention to its own time. The problem is that as I analyze the emerging publicity around global warming I find disturbing evidence of a cynical, elitist manipulation of human gullibility - ostensibly in the public interest - which could lead towards devastating and entirely inhumane, even genocidal policies. Of all the dangerous gases human beings create, carbon dioxide is hardly first on the list of those I would target. Mercury maybe, or depleted uranium dust; how about pesticides or the aerosols sprayed by aircraft? There are plenty of known poisons requiring urgent remediation solutions.
As you look at some of the information below, you will find that the link between human CO2 levels and global warming may not be scientifically proven. However, by monetizing CO2 emissions, the global elite have come upon a way to create a global marketplace for the atmosphere. In other words, by cynically manipulating the public's desire to do the right thing, elite bankers and their cronies in the energy companies are putting the final nail into the coffin of the commons.
Let's start with the infamous 1992 quote of Richard Sandor, Chairman and CEO of the Chicago Climate Exchange, the commercial brainchild of Al Gore's supposedly well-intentioned efforts to alert the world to "global warming:"
"Air and water are no longer the free goods that economics once assumed. They must be redefined as property rights so that they can be efficiently allocated."
The whole notion of property rights is alien to those who have found solace and sanity in the indigenous belief in the innate unownability of the sacred universe. On the other hand, protecting property rights is certainly understandable when it comes down to holding on to your farm in the face of predatory lending, eminent domain, a racist "right of return" policy, or some other corrupt scheme to steal from the weak or honest.
Nevertheless, the implications of Mr. Sandor's remarks are devastating. Namely, in the future, the one with the money will be the one with the right to travel, create electricity and pollute. Since the gentle reader will by now already be aware that the creation of currency has largely been privatized by the international banking system and operates without oversight either here in America or abroad, the stark reality that those who print money seek to own the atmosphere and water of our planet becomes altogether too much to ignore.
Adding to my confusion, the normally reputable and fearless Alex Jones and his brilliant young British colleague Paul Joseph Watson of infowars.com recently attacked both the science and the policy objectives behind global warming. They cited a perceptive article by Daniel Taylor which spells out concerns which I share:
"In a report titled "The First Global Revolution" (1991) published by the Club of Rome, a globalist think tank, we find the following statement: "In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill.... All these dangers are caused by human intervention... The real enemy, then, is humanity itself"
Today, global warming and climate change in general have become foundational issues for one of the largest political movements of our time. As more focus is placed on global warming, the solutions which are being presented to the world often have nothing to do with what many are saying is the root cause of the problem. Scientific evidence has emerged, highlighted in the documentary "The Great Global Warming Swindle," which supports the theory that the sun is in fact a major driving force behind global warming. Ice core samples show that CO2 levels (which are blamed by many to be the initiating force behind a rise in global temperature) rise 800 years after an initial rise in temperature. Other data gathered regarding solar activity show a clear connection between fluctuations in the sun's activity and temperature variations on earth. If the sun is in fact the culprit for changes in the earth's temperature, world taxes, global government and other solutions we are being given are not cutting to the root cause of climate change
Richard Haass, the current president of the Council on Foreign Relations, stated in his article 'State Sovereignty Must be Altered in Globalized Era,' that a system of world government must be created and sovereignty eliminated in order to fight global warming, as well as terrorism. 'Moreover, states must be prepared to cede some sovereignty to world bodies if the international system is to function,' says Haass. 'Globalization thus implies that sovereignty is not only becoming weaker in reality, but that it needs to become weaker. States would be wise to weaken sovereignty in order to protect themselves...' Everyone, regardless of your position on global warming or the environment, must take into consideration the solutions that we are being given, as well as the forces behind them which seek to create a global system of domination and control."
I ran the above and one of the scientific papers on the subject by the brilliant and dedicated Ben Luce, director of the Coalition for Clean and Affordable Energy in New Mexico. This was the essence of his reply, for which I was thankful: "Of course the globalist elite will try to use global warming as an excuse to achieve their aims! Every political power tries to exploit current events for their own favour. Witness how the nuclear power industry is also exploiting global warming for its own benefit. But this has nothing to do whatsoever with whether or not global warming is being caused by the incredibly massive emissions of carbon dioxide by human civilization, and whether or not global warming is pretty much about to destroy what's left of the biodiversity and health of the biosphere. The scientific evidence for these are overwhelming - all one has to do is look at it with one's own eyes.
And it's also clear that corporations such as Exxon, Peabody Energy, etc, have funded very aggressive efforts to suppress public awareness and reaction to this evidence. That is also well documented. It should be kept in mind that these corporations are not necessarily identical with the globalists who might seek to exploit global warming for their own purposes.
If some anti-globalists conclude that global warming is just a big hoax by the globalists, and decide that we don't need to act to stop global warming, then they are just playing into the hands of one set of corporations to avoid being exploited by another. The real trick is to promote solutions that don't play into the hands of either. Not to say this is easy, given the power of the elite, and the power of the fossil fuel industry. But its the only way out."
But when I asked Ben to analyze the science behind the famous "hockey-stick" graph on the front cover and reproduced here, Ben was too busy. I understand. But I am concerned enough to publish the raw data, and let you, the reader, decide for yourself.
The graphs on the front cover of this issue are extremely important to understand, which is why I have included them again here. The first one is a 1996 United Nations graph showing the medieval warming period. The second is the extremely angular 2001 "hockey stick" graph without the medieval warming period. This graph supposedly demonstrates that global warming is a phenomenon associated strictly with the industrial revolution and the sky-rocketing use of fossil fuels for energy. The 2001 report asserts that the medieval warming period was fiction, and that its inclusion in 1996 was erroneous. However, the scientists at co2science.org have assembled a massive amount of data supporting the presence of the medieval warming period. The problem with the medieval warming period is that if it existed, then the industrial use of CO2 emitting fossil fuels cannot be considered the sole or even dominant cause of global warming.
Furthermore the 1996 report specifically warned against the type of dataset that was ultimately used for the creation of the "hockey-stick graph." And this is where the plot thickens, because according to several distinguished meteorologists and climatologists, the UN's 2001 report - on which the entire "Inconvenient Truth" of global warming is based - relies on defective, perhaps even cooked data.
Enter the Viscount Christopher Monckton of Brenchley, whose paper on the topic appeared in London's Sunday Telegraph. In it he brought to my attention the fact that there is indeed a scientific crisis of confidence underlying the political one. Here's what Monckton said about the data used to justify the "hockey stick" graph and the ensuing hysteria and carbon trading projects:
"The UN's 2001 graph, variously known as the "hockey-stick" or "foxtail" or "J-curve", had first appeared in Nature (Mann et al., 1998) and, the following year, in Geophysical Review Letters (Mann et al., 1999). After its appearance in the UN's 2001 report, McIntyre et al. (2003, 2005) demonstrated that the erasure of the mediaeval warm period in the 2001 graph had been caused by inappropriate data selection and incorrect use of statistical methods.
The first mistake made by Mann et al. and copied by the UN in 2001 lay in the choice of proxy data. The UN's 1996 report had recommended against reliance upon bristlecone pines as proxies for reconstructing temperature, because 20th-century carbon-dioxide fertilization accelerated annual growth and caused a false appearance of exceptional recent warming.
Notwithstanding the warning against reliance upon bristlecones in UN 1996, Mann et al. had relied chiefly upon a series of bristlecone-pine datasets for their reconstruction of mediaeval temperatures. Worse, their statistical model had given the bristlecone-pine datasets 390 times more prominence than the other datasets they had used. To McIntyre et al., it appeared possible that Mann et al. had given the tainted bristlecone data series such exceptional prominence, effectively swamping all influence from the other datasets in their calculations, because the bristlecone-pine dataset produced the pronounced 20th-century uptick (and a corresponding suppression of evidence for mediaeval high temperatures), which would apparently eradicate the mediaeval warm period
McIntyre et al. (2003, 2005) also tested the algorithm of Mann et al. (1998, & UN, 2001) without the bristlecone-pine data, whereupon the mediaeval warm period reappeared. They also found that Mann et al. had excluded from their calculations a single dataset covering the later mediaeval warm period, which had been stored in a computer file marked "CENSORED_DATA". McKitrick et al. ran the Mann et al. model including the missing dataset, and again found that the mediaeval warm period reappeared.
Several eminent scientists have commented on the work of McIntyre and McKitrick. For instance, Philip Muller (2004), a physicist at Berkeley, said that the two Canadian scientists' work "hit me like a bombshell, and I suspect it is having the same effect on many others. Suddenly the hockey stick, the poster-child of the global warming community, turns out to be an artifact of poor mathematics." Dr. Rob van Dorland, of the Dutch National Meteorological Agency, has said: "It is strange that the climate reconstruction of Mann passed both peer review rounds of the IPCC without anyone ever really having checked it."
In February 2005 the German television channel Das Erste interviewed Ulrich Cubasch, a climatologist, who said that he had been unable to reproduce the Mann et al. "hockey-stick" graph, whereupon he " discussed the objections with his colleagues, and sought to work them through. Bit by bit, it became as clear to his colleagues as it had to him: the two Canadians were right. Between 1400 and 1600, the temperature shift was considerably higher than, for example, in the previous century. With that, the core conclusion, and also that of the entire IPCC 2001 Report, was completely undermined."
Dr. Hendrik Tennekes, director emeritus of the Royal Meteorological Institute of the Netherlands, wrote to Dr. McIntyre in 2005 to say: 'The IPCC review process is totally flawed. The scientific basis for the Kyoto Protocol is grossly inadequate.'
However, the fact that the central graph of the UN's 2001 report was defective has not had anything like as much attention from the media as the stories of impending disaster which politicians and the UN itself have derived from it this defective graph is the only figure which was featured as many as six times in the UN's 2001 report, appearing with great prominence and in full colour on each occasion. The centrality of its importance to the case for alarm may be judged not only from the frequency and prominence of its appearance in the UN's 2001 report but also from the following conclusion, which appears in the Summary for Policy-makers:
"New analyses of proxy data for the Northern Hemisphere indicate that the increase in temperature in the 20th century is likely to have been the largest of any century during the past 1,000 years. It is also likely that, in the Northern Hemisphere, the 1990s was the warmest decade and 1998 the warmest year... Because less data are available, less is known about annual averages prior to 1,000 years before present and for conditions prevailing in most of the Southern Hemisphere prior to 1861."
The UN relied not only upon the flawed Mann et al. reconstruction but also upon a series of similar papers contributed to scientific journals, which seemed to support the abolition of the mediaeval warm period, as a report by the House of Lords Economic Affairs Committee (Lords 2005) pointed out. However, an independent report by statisticians (US Senate 2005), perhaps the most devastating scientific criticism yet levelled at the UN on climate change, concluded not only that the UN's 2001 temperature reconstruction had used inappropriate statistical methods and data but also that many of the supporting scientific papers, both before and after the 2001 report, had been written by a small and closely-connected group of palaeoclimatologists, who effectively dominated their field worldwide, and were all intimately linked to the principal author of the UN's 2001 graph.
It was not until prolonged pressure had been exerted upon the editors of Nature that a (less than complete) corrigendum was published (Mann et al., 2004). Not only Nature but also other leading peer-reviewed scientific journals had refused to publish the first paper by McIntyre et al. (2003) exposing the flawed graph. Eventually, Geophysical Review Letters (McIntyre et al., 2005) had the courage to break ranks and publish the truth.
The US National Academy of Sciences has since issued a statement that the "hockey-stick" graph was defective. Significantly, however, the UN has issued no statement of apology or correction. It continues to use the "hockey-stick" in its publications."
Elitists, if confronted with no recourse, might say that perhaps global warming is a "noble lie," like Iraqi WMDs. It's the environmental 9/11. They might say, "but the Earth is dying and we had to figure out some way to save it(without giving up our control over it, of course)." But I have never seen deception result in goodness before, and I don't expect to now. Furthermore, how can one take seriously the empathic capability of British Petroleum's Chief Executive Peter Sutherland who, in a speech to his elitist cohorts in the Trilateral Commission, "issued a 'Universal battle cry for the world to address "global warming" with a single voice?'" Then there's General Lord Guthrie, director of the ultra-elitist financier operation N.M. Rothschild & Sons, member of the House of Lords and former chief of the Defence Staff in London, who urged the Trilateral power-brokers to "address the global climate crisis with a single voice, and impose rules that apply worldwide."
According to Richard Freeman and Merry Baker in their enlightening article "Carbon Trade Swindle Behind Gore Hoax," here's what the global warming sales pitch is designed to create: "The centrepiece of the U.S. emerging market for carbon emissions trading, is the Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX), created in 2003 as a "voluntary," or pilot agency, part of a London-based network positioned to reproduce the oil bubble on a scale orders of magnitude greater and more dangerous, while at the same time, destroying what's left of the physical economy.
The idea is that if governments cap CO2 emissions, then the "market" will take off for the buying and selling of emissions "allowances." This is the whole point of the "cap-and-trade" plan for CO2. If it sounds crazy, it is. But Gore is just one of the most visible parts of the elaborate (and bi-partisan) schemes that have been set in motion under cover of climate change. Gore's personal financial involvement is blatant, especially through Goldman Sachs-a large shareholder of CCX, and in 2004, the creator of Gore's very own London-based hedge fund, Generation Investment Management.
CCX has multiple interconnections with the London-run Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE), whose subsidiary is the International Petroleum Exchange, the world's largest petroleum futures and options market. The dirty details of ICE and the Great Oil Price Swindle came out extensively at a May 8, 2006 Senate Democratic Policy Committee hearing, where Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.) said that futures speculation on the ICE was the driver for adding $20 to 25 to the price of every barrel of oil"
The carbon swap / global warming advertising campaign psyop reminds me of internet spam plugging unknown penny stocks. But this is a professional racket, a really good one. I'm not sure I'll be buying carbon swaps. Will you? We're better off spending time in the garden.
_____
Arwen Gwyneth Hubbard and Skip Whitson contributed to this article. Leland Lehrman can be reached at leland.lehrman @ gmail.com or 982-3609
----------------------------------------------------------------
Global Sovereignty wrote:
Global Warning exposed.
They don't have enough fun stealing our lives, they want the atmosphere as well!!!!
Ant---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: cole Date: Apr 29, 2007 11:17 AMSubject: FW: At last!
To: Freedom Force <>
Hi ant whaddya reckon about this stuph…. No end to it alllll. Cp x
Graham Strachan
Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2007 5:11 PM
To: Graham S................
Subject: At last!
I've been wondering what it's all about, and here it is.
According to Richard Freeman and Merry Baker in their enlightening article "Carbon Trade Swindle Behind Gore Hoax," here's what the global warming sales pitch is designed to create: "The centerpiece of the U.S. emerging market for carbon emissions trading, is the Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX), created in 2003 as a "voluntary," or pilot agency, part of a London-based network positioned to reproduce the oil bubble on a scale orders of magnitude greater and more dangerous, while at the same time, destroying what's left of the physical economy.
The idea is that if governments cap CO2 emissions, then the "market" will take off for the buying and selling of emissions "allowances." This is the whole point of the "cap-and-trade" plan for CO2. If it sounds crazy, it is. But Gore is just one of the most visible parts of the elaborate (and bi-partisan) schemes that have been set in motion under cover of climate change. Gore's personal financial involvement is blatant, especially through Goldman Sachs-a large shareholder CCX, and in 2004, the creator of Gore's very own London-based hedge fund, Generation Investment Management.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Phil,
Amen! to all of it.
However, while, as you've previously mentioned, some debate is better than no debate, we see just another example of debate going nowhere. At best, another lost opportunity -- at worst, more debate food to create more debate WITHOUT the real truth, exposed. And the truth is being spread by many sources all over the 'States, Britain and here.
Nowhere in the article is the truth;
1. - Global Warming IS a scam
2. - The REASON why the Scam has been put in place is --
The bankster's Think Tanks set up the Kyoto Protocol. "Global Warming" and "Climate Change" are deliberately beat up "issues" by the banks and Big Money to get control of world wealth and to privatise water. All usable fresh water.
(The closest [and it's NOT close] of anything in the article that would impart the TRUTH of the whole scam of GW to people, was the following remark.
Dr Christopher Landsea, former IPCC author and hurricane expert: "It is beyond me why my (IPCC) colleagues would utilise the media to push an unsupported agenda that recent hurricane activity has been due to global warming . . . )
It's beyond him??
regards,
Don
----- Original Message -----
From: philip..............
To: Don Pike
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 1:11 PM
Subject: Fw: rejoice in life! well done Andrew Bolt you're a hero!
----- Original Message -----
From: Peter Jenkins
To: bolta @ heraldsun.com.au
Cc: haynesp @ hwt.newsltd.com.au
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 9:57 AM
Subject: rejoice in life! well done Andrew Bolt you're a hero!
Miseryguts Anti-Life Journalists Eat Their Words
Good news at last! The intrepid reporter Andrew Bolt has written this exciting pro-life piece for the Herald Sun in Melbourne. It's about the wonderful news that though the "network"-controlled commerical media will not touch it nevertheless Australia's national broadcasting commission the
ABC will--in the interests of "balance in reporting"--screen The Great Global Warming Swindle. Alleliua! The season is the reason...
Now, here's St Andrew!
THE ABC's staff is in uproar. There's talk of mutiny, over furiously steaming mugs of herbal infusion.
The hotter-headed have even occupied the studios (what's new?) and now man hastily-erected barricades built entirely of sandals.
You see, an order has gone out. For the first time, ABC television will have to show a documentary in July that - gasp! - doubts man is heating the world to hell.
Yes, after showing endless reports telling you there's no doubting we'll burn in hell, the ABC is running a film that says: "Well, actually . . ."
It's naturally an imported British show - which ABC journalist would so dirty their hands? - and is modestly titled The Great Global Warming Swindle.
It quotes many sceptical scientists and was a smash this year in Britain, doubtless because sane people prefer to hear both sides of a debate. But if the public here will be pleased, some of the ABC's gatekeepers are not.
Take the ABC's top science journalist, Science Show host and global warming prophet Robyn Williams.
Williams advised the ABC not to buy Swindle and says the ABC is "verging on the irresponsible" to air something "demonstrably wrong".
That's brazen coming from Williams, an alarmist who insists - with not a scientist to back him - that warming may cause sea rises of 100m this century.
Reminded on Triple J last week that the influential United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) predicts sea rises this century, not of 100 metres but at worst 59cm, Williams stuck to his claim, despite conceding it "could be alarmist, yes".
Irresponsible? Demonstrably wrong? Hand Williams a mirror.
But I can understand the shock of his colleagues, few of whom realised there were sceptical scientists still left, other than the kind found in parks, begging for donations from top-hatted oil men, and twisting beards matted with twigs and discarded theses.
Take ABC 774 morning host Jon Faine, who on Wednesday abused a caller who said it might be nice to hear from scientists who - like him - doubted that most of this warming was caused by man, or was actually bad, or could wisely be stopped.
Scoffed Faine: "You've got something like, I don't know, the vast overwhelming majority of the world's scientists saying you're an idiot."
Sceptical scientists, he said, could be counted on his fingers: "There's no doubt you'll find a couple and then they'll tend to pull a few more in from here and there."
And now the ABC is giving air time to these "couple" of "idiot" scientists and a few crazies and crooks they'll "pull in"? No wonder ABC staff are so shocked.
But let me reassure them. Let me do what's never been done in an Australian newspaper and list some of the thousands of nice scientists who indeed are sceptics.
Perhaps then Faine might at last ask himself why he thought there were just "one or two". And why "his" ABC has so rarely let them speak or be heard.
1. Scientists who doubt there's a scientific "consensus" that we face dangerous man-made global warming.
Prof John Christy, IPCC lead author and head of Alabama's Earth System Science Centre: "I've often heard it said that there is a consensus of thousands of scientists (who say) humans are causing a catastrophic change to the climate system. Well, I am one scientist, and there are many, that simply think that is not true."
Prof Charles Wax, Mississippi state climatologist: "There isn't a consensus among scientists."
Dr Roy Spencer, formerly NASA's senior climate scientist: "The only consensus I'm aware of is that it's warmed in the last century."
Prof emeritus Joel Kauffman, University of the Sciences in Philadelphia: "(M)any professors of climate science realise that carbon dioxide generated by human activity has caused little or no global warming."
2. IPCC scientists who doubt even the IPCC, said to represent 2500 scientists who all believe in dangerous man-made warming.
Prof Yuri Izrael, IPCC vice-chairman: "There is no serious threat to the climate."
Richard Lindzen, former IPCC lead author and meteorology professor at MIT: "There is no substantive basis for predictions of sizeable global warming due to observed increases in minor greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide, methane, and chlorofluorocarbons."
Dr Vincent Gray, IPCC reviewer: "The continued fairly unchanging warm weather since 1998 shows no signs of increasing, and is probably influenced by changes in the sun."
Dr Christopher Landsea, former IPCC author and hurricane expert: "It is beyond me why my (IPCC) colleagues would utilise the media to push an unsupported agenda that recent hurricane activity has been due to global warming . . . I personally cannot in good faith continue to contribute to a
process that I view as both being motivated by pre-conceived agendas and being scientifically unsound."
3. Petitions of scientists who doubt the faith.
A 2006 letter to Canada's Prime Minister signed by 60 experts in climate-related fields: " 'Climate change is real' is a meaningless phrase used repeatedly by activists to convince the public that a climate catastrophe is looming and humanity is the cause. Neither of these fears is justified."
The Oregon Petition of Dr Frederick Seitz, US National Academy of Sciences past president, with the verified signatures of 17,800 scientists and technicians, including 2600 climate scientists: "There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere."
The 2005 Leipzig Petition of Fred Singer, professor emeritus of environmental science at Virginia University, and signed by about 80 prominent scientists and academics: "(W)e cannot subscribe to the
politically inspired world view that envisages climate catastrophes and calls for hasty actions."
4. Experts who once believed but now doubt.
Prof Nir Shaviv, Hebrew University astrophysicist: "Solar activity can explain a large part of the 20th-century global warming."
Dr David Bellamy, famed green activist: "Global warming is largely a natural phenomenon."
Dr Reid Bryson, top climatologist and founding chairman of Wisconsin University's meteorology department: Temperatures are rising "because we're coming out of the little ice age, not because we're putting more carbon dioxide into the air".
Prof Tim Patterson, Carleton University paleo-climatologist: "The temperatures match very closely with the solar cycles."
Prof Emeritus Jan Veizer, Ottawa University environmental geochemist: "The past record strongly favours the solar/cosmic alternative (to human gases) as the principal climate driver."
5. Local doubters.
Bob Carter, research professor at James Cook University: "That 20th century warming - the most recent of many previous warm phases of similar or greater magnitude - was dangerous or human-caused, or even that the warming has continued after 1998, all yet remain to be demonstrated."
William Kininmonth, former National Climate Centre head: "(A)larmist predictions have no sound basis."
Dr David Evans, former climate modeller at the Australian Greenhouse Office: "(N)ew evidence has weakened the case that carbon emissions are the main cause. I am now sceptical."
Ian Plimer, professor of mining geology at Adelaide University: Blaming humans is "pseudo-science".
6. Interesting doubters.
Prof Antonio Zichichi, World Federation of Scientists president: Plausible "man is not to blame".
Prof Edward Wegman, who led an inquiry for a US Congressional committee to check IPCC statistics: "The assessments that the decade of the 1990s was the hottest decade in a millennium and that 1998 was the hottest year in a millennium cannot be supported."
The late Roger Revelle, the professor Al Gore says first warned him of warming: The science is "too uncertain to justify drastic action".
Habibullo Abdussamatov, head of Russia's Pulkovo Astronomical Observatory: "Solar irradiance began to drop in the 1990s, and a minimum will be reached by approximately 2040. It will cause a steep cooling of the climate on earth in 15 to 20 years."
There's dozens more, but I've run out of space. Now count: How many has the ABC let speak? Why so few?
Isn't it high time it let just some of these sceptics - at least this once - explain themselves to you?
Debate really shouldn't be this frightening. Not if the truth is on your side.
Join Andrew on blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt
--------------------------------------
We have felt for a long-time The Global Warming Propaganda is a hoax and this article backs up everything else we have been reading on this subject. The few brief points we will add to this article is the Divide & Rule & Hegelian Dialectic strategies at play for a pending one world government & credit-creation currency + the privatisation of all natural water; all benefiting the "The Law" and its Internationalised Private Corporation Agenda (global stock of human slaves) steered by Judeo-Judaic Zionists. Note: Zionists are not Jews & have never been Jews. Zionism is not cultural or racial, but an ideology. Al Gore is a Zionist and so is John Howard. Zionists hide behind Jews to use the Jewish Race. Most Jewish people are innocent and brainwashed, like most Westerners, as you can see by the English Letter j which only came into existence during the 1600's. And Yes, The Zionists invented the English Language as well as "The Law". Refer to our flier page for further details.
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
| Bank:
Account name: BSB: Account number: SWIFT BIC Code: | Australia New Zealand Banking Group (ANZ)
Fiona Caroline Cristian 012 547 5576 81376 ANZBAU3M |
8th February 2012
Ben Lowrey benlowrey.com Interviews Arthur Cristian www.loveforlife.com.au - 8th February 2012 - 89 Minutes 47 Seconds. Arthur discusses a wide range of subjects from Freeman & the law to how "The System" is designed to have us process the curses of "The System". He talks about his and Fiona's experiences with the law & why Love For Life started. Arthur also discusses the remedy to the tyranny of "The System" & the way back to peace, truth, freedom, joy, abundance & Do No Harm for all of life without loss of uniqueness or the need for slaves & rulers. Who we really are, what we are really part of & our true purpose is very different to what we are taught by the brainwashing of "The System" that has us re-present the thoughts of other men & women rather than thinking unique thoughts inspired by direct experience, perception interaction with nature. Everything we, the Cristian family, have gone through, from bank fraud and the theft of the family home to death threats and attempts on Arthur's life, is touched on.
YouTube Channel: http://www.youtube.com/ArthurLoveForLife
More info (links to articles, debates/discussions, documents & more background info on the videos) can be found by scrolling down this Love For Life website home page
All the best
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
The “Name” Is The Mark Of The Beast
The Strawman Identifying Your Slave Status In “The System”
5th February 2012 - 56 Minutes 25 Seconds
"The Dream Of Life" Part 6
Under The Spell Of Intellectual Property
19th April 2012 - 51 Minutes 52 Seconds
"The Dream Of Life" Part 5A
System Science is Fraud and the Timeline of Chaos
30th November 2011 - 57 Minutes 36 Seconds
"The Dream Of Life" Part 5B
System Science is Fraud and the Timeline of Chaos
29th January 2012 - 67 Minutes 26 Seconds
"The Dream Of Life" Part 5C
System Science is Fraud and the Timeline of Chaos
22nd February 2012 - 67 Minutes 25 Seconds
"The Dream Of Life" Part 5D
Images Of Deception - The Intelligence Agents Amongst Us
24th February 2012 - 44 Minutes 53 Seconds
Song "Save Our Lives"
31st January 2012 - 5 Minutes 38 Seconds
"The Dream Of Life" Part 1
21st October 2011 - 62 Minutes 47 Seconds
"The Dream Of Life" Part 2
23rd October 2011 - 83 Minutes 47 Seconds
"The Dream Of Life" Part 3
26th October 2011 - 101 Minutes 10 Seconds
"The Dream Of Life" Part 4
29th October 2011 - 57 Minutes 30 Seconds
Key To Kindom
Co-Creation Of Do No Harm Communities
Causing A Mass Exodus From "The System"
7th February 2011 - 24 Minutes 48 Seconds
Short Story - Once Upon A Time
Written in 2007
18th February 2011 - 8 Minutes 38 Seconds
Kindom Garden
Creating A Large Organic Recycled Transportable Garden
4th February 2012 - 17 Minutes 16 Seconds
Background Information For All These Videos Can Be Found Here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8275
April 2011
This is an extract taken from a recent Facebook Discussion.
Links to all these Facebook discussions/debates can be found here:
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/3385
Control the land and you control MAN on the land
Displace MAN from land and you turn MAN into slaves
All men, women and children have a natural inheritance to a piece of land (a hectare is sufficient) to care for and co-create life with, land with access to clean water and shelter where they can grow food and raise their families in peace and freedom, doing no harm to the land, to their lives and all of life, and passing on the land and its abundance to their descendants and tribes/villages/communities.
Is there any man, woman or child who will come forward and say we do not have that natural inheritance?
For what are we without land?
Our natural inheritance comes without the threat of being stolen or sold, and is unencumbered by debt or any other man-made restriction BUT comes with full responsibility for nurturing that land and doing no harm. Once we give up our responsibility, we need masters and, once we need masters, we become slaves. We lose our freedom and we lose our uniqueness.
We were never meant to be in the image/likeness of another MAN'S thought but, once we have masters, we are forced to mould the men, women and children we are into the likeness of the thoughts of our masters. When we are displaced from land, we have to rely on our masters for everything, thus acquiescing our freedom, uniqueness and responsibility as we accept the handouts and "The Systems" of our masters. We become the cogs of "The System", drones turning on our brothers and sisters of life, once all MAN on the land, in the name of "The System" which only benefits the tiny few who control "The System". The local councils, etc, have become the Land Barons of "The System", at the beck and call of the Priests who control everything.
Free on the land, able to provide our families with all they need, we are free to be the unique men, women and children we are meant to be, thinking thoughts that are unique to each of us as we contemplate on and interact with nature all around us.
All our problems stem from the lie that some men and women have the right to have power and control over others and, when we accept this lie, we support and maintain it.
No MAN is master of another MAN
All men are equal
Displacing MAN from land is slavery
MAN on the land is where true peace and freedom for all begins
The statutes of Council rules, etc, are all part of the scam to keep MAN from being free on the land. Common Law, Democracy and Constitutional Rights, etc, do nothing to solve this problem as they also support the displacement of MAN from land because most people cannot compete in "The System" of commerce as their natural skills lie elsewhere and they are not good at making money out of other men and women; they don't like it. Those who cannot compete are discriminated against; they have lost their uniqueness and their freedom on the land and they become the garbage collectors, the sewerage workers and all the other cogs through the rank and file of the blue and white collar workers. The dog-eat-dog, survival-of-the-fittest-and-smartest "System" keep the few in control of all the land so that they can control all the men and women residing on that land.
The Church, The Bar, The Courts, The Aristocracy, The Governments and Councils are the means by which the few maintain control of the land and maintain the lie of some having power and control over others. They are not to be found anywhere in nature and anywhere there are tribes still living peacefully in pristine forests. Where they exist is where all the tribes were displaced from the land and where the remnants of the tribes and those sent in to live amongst them, live under the control of the Church and its systems. Operating out of this lie, those who work for "The System" can only do harm. If they want to go with truth, they can only stop working for "The System" and do all they can to get it out of our lives.
The cogs of "The System" can come and do harm to anyone on the land at any time without having to take responsibility for it, although all harm is a curse and curses always return to the makers and holders of the curses.
The key to our freedom is in removing the power & control of the few over the land. Once we do that, they have nothing.
Who are they to think they can tell us we are not free?
All man-made systems require slaves and rulers. It is impossible to avoid this fact, this circumstance. Being forced to live under the rules, regulations, rituals, procedures, conditions and contracts of any man-made system causes a loss of uniqueness to everyone exposed to them. No man, woman or child is answerable to anyone or anything re-presenting a man-made system. We were never meant to give up FULL-responsibility for our lives, which is what we do when we acquiesce to any man-made system, be it cashless or not, gold standard or not, religious, political, legal, social, environmental, spiritual, philosophical, commercial, esoteric, international or domestic or not, and fall under the standing of its authorities, representatives and enforcers. All man-made systems are a scam as will be the coming New World Order system with its cosmic, galactic, Christianised, feel good/feel god, "Oneness" glue remedy to cure the present earth-wide chaos engineered by the tiny few who still want all the power and glory. This cashless "one-world" remedy will be overseen by an earth-wide power structure no different to the Federation overseeing the non-sense cashless world of Star Trek.
Tools used by those behind man-made systems to indoctrinate the masses include all religions, holy books, history books, science, the New Age and all forms of education stemming from any of the many universities presently offering "system career" courses across Earth. Placed on the conveyor belt running through factory planet earth, brainwashed men and woman are being manufactured in sameness moulds to produce individuals (in-divide-u-all-s). We are already unique, not one the same as the next, but all man-made systems trick us through propaganda and manipulation into giving up our uniqueness so we can become the willing slaves and rulers in "The System". All man-made systems (all beliefs, faiths & associated opinions) cause loss of uniqueness. As already mentioned we were never meant to be in the image/likeness of another mans thought.
Broken up into individuals, we no longer feel the bonds between us which is why we think we need an artificial system to co-exist. All Freemasonic/Satanic holy books, and belief systems exist to keep us in an individualised state so that we accept "The Systems" that control us therefore giving our power and life-force-energy away to those hiding behind "The Systems" to rule us with. There is no other reason or purpose for their existence. They are all designed to con us into being ruled by man-made systems, to con us into accepting third party figures, whether saviours or "leaders" so that we give up the responsibility for our lives here and now to them. Even to the point where we no longer think that what is happening on Earth is important because we believe in "life after death" or the ascended masters of the Galactic Federation or some "other world" out there where we will have peace from the pressures of life under "The System". They all come packaged as fairytales with fairytale props and characters for us to give up our responsibility for our lives to here and now so that we can be ruled by those Freemasons/Satanists hiding behind "The System" of those fairytales.
This is why the Freemasonic/Satanic world always operates in the shadows. They are the master puppeteers pulling at the strings of the belief, faith and associated opinion of their marionettes. Just as little Mary is unable to bring forward the Alice in Wonderland characters and settings she is playing to prove they exist neither are those who believe in "The System" fairytales able to bring forward 1st party to 1st party proof/substance of their existence. All they can do is re-present them but they are the only ones present; the characters are not. No matter how intense and for how long they believe in their fairytales and how much they argue for them and protect them, the believers only have their belief, faith and associated opinion. The brainwashing is extensive.
Individualism is as if we go to the ants and say, "Hey ants! We are changing your values and giving you a new program called individualism. You are now free to be in-divide-u-all-s; you can each have your own truths and no one has the right to take them away from you." And so the ants go off to become materialists, Buddhists, Christians, Jews, atheists, republicans, democrats, New Agers, conservatives, punk rockers, journalists, psychologists, politicians, priests, banksters, judges, lawyers, etc, etc. Meanwhile back in the ant world colony, who is taking care of the babies and the elderly and maintaining the nest? Inevitably, the ant-world perishes and all individualised ants go with it! This is what is happening to MAN and MANS Earth. Is this the consequence we all want? We each need to take full-responsibility for our lives so that together the responsibility for taking care of Life is taken care of. Passing the buck to a 3rd party God, man, woman, fiction, law, political party, piece of paper, electronic/digital recording device, etc, stops each of us from taking full-responsibility for life.
We are determined to co-create Kindoms/Do No Harm Communities to be the living-remedy that provides an everlasting peace, freedom, truth, joy, abundance and do no harm for all of life without the need for having slaves and rulers or causing loss of uniqueness.
Note: To continue exploring the information we share and fill in all the other missing pieces please read the articles: "Re-Presenting Is The Pull Of Duality Into False Consciousness" 19th April 2011: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8129, "Introduction To "The Curses Are Being Returned" 11th June 2011: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8183 and explore the many videos, podcasts, articles and recent Facebook/email discussions/debates posted here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6608 and here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/3385 and here: http://loveforlife.com.au.
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
April 2011
The information contained on this world wide web site (the web site and all information herein shall be collectively referred to as "Web Site Information"), under the registered url name, loveforlife.com.au, resides on a host server environment in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15203, United States of America.
The Web Site Information has been prepared to provide general information only and is not intended to constitute or be construed as providing substantive professional advice or opinion on any facts or circumstances. Transmission of the information is not intended to create, nor does its receipt give rise to, a professional-client relationship between 'Love for Life' and the receiver.
While every care has been taken to ensure the accuracy and timeliness of the information prepared and/or reported on this site, 'Love for Life' is not responsible for any errors or omissions or for the Web Site Information not being up to date. The Web Site Information may not reflect the most current developments.
The impact of the law, policy and/or procedure for any particular situation depends on a variety of factors; therefore, readers should not act upon any Web Site Information without seeking professional advice. 'Love for Life' is not responsible for any action taken in reliance on any Web Site Information herein.
'Love for Life' is not responsible for any action you or others take which relies on information in this website and/or responses thereto. 'Love for Life' disclaim all responsibility and liability for loss or damage suffered by any person relying, directly or indirectly, on the Web Site Information, including in relation to negligence or any other default.
'Love for Life' does not warrant, represent or hold out that any Web Site Information will not cause damage, or is free from any computer virus, defect(s) or error(s). 'Love for Life' is not liable to users for any loss or damage however caused resulting from the use of material found on its web site.
'Love for Life' does not necessarily endorse or approve of any Web Site Information linked to and contained on other web sites linked herein and makes no warranties or representations regarding the merchantability or fitness for purpose, accuracy and quality, of any such information.
The sending of information by you, and the receipt of it by 'Love for Life', is not intended to, and does not, create a professional-client relationship.
All Web Site Information is considered correct at the time of the web site's most recent revision.
Note: Updated Wednesday 17th June 2009 8.00pm Sydney Time.
Love For Life does not support harm doing in any shape or form. However, we are supporters of free speech and post articles, documentaries, etc, that represent a wide cross section of ideas. See the Love For Life extensive research library where over 11,000 individual documents, articles, videos, podcasts and debates/discussions are posted: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/82. We clearly see the evidence of the destruction to MAN and Earth that has been caused by ALL religions over the centuries and are therefore not supporters of religions, cults, sects or any group that demands conformity of thought, speech or action, or has rules, regulations or rituals that must be followed. Religions, nationalities and cultural "identities" are formed as a result of the brainwashing we receive from childhood. They are part of the tactics the Establishment uses to keep us all divided from one another and fighting one another.
All religions promote discrimination and division, leading to hatred and even violence and murder. None of them have yet to produce a remedy to all the suffering, poverty, unhappiness and discrimination in the world. If any religion truly had the remedy to all the suffering on earth, there would no longer be any suffering. What have Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, Judaism, atheism and the New Age done to end the suffering in the world?
The Love For Life website has information from all sides on many subjects, whether about Islam, Judaism, Christianity, Law, health, psychology, mind control, vaccination, aspartame, MSG, Chemtrails etc. There are over 11,000 individual articles, documentaries, etc on the website and they are so diverse that we are sure that everyone would be able to find something they loved and something they hated, if they took the time to search. If we removed all the articles hated by everyone, there would probably be nothing left! We are not anti anyone but freedom of speech is freedom of speech and no one should condemn the work of another without taking the time to research the subject themselves. Yes, there are articles by those who have a less-than-rosy-viewpoint of Judaism, but there are also articles on the dark side of Tibetan Buddhism (and it is very dark) for those who are interested in the truth: Tibet - Buddhism - Dalai Lama: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6271 Should the authors of these articles be abused and imprisoned for daring to challenge the widely conceived reputation of Buddhism as being the religion of peace and love and that of the Dalai Lama as a saint, or should those interested be allowed to study the work and come to their own conclusions? The same applies to all the articles, documentaries, etc, about Christianity, Islam, Freemasonry, New World Order, etc.
The Love for Life website also shows how the Rule of Law, the Bar, the Government, the Monarchy, the system of commerce, the local, national and multi/trans-national private corporations, all the courses and careers on offer from our universities, all the educators, scientists, academics and experts, the aristocrats and the Establishment bloodlines have also done NOTHING to end the suffering in the world. The website maps the insanity of a world where there is no help for those in need, just as there was no help available for us when we were victims of terrible bank fraud: http://loveforlife.com.au/court_case orchestrated, condoned and protected by an international crime syndicate/terrorist organisation of judges, barristers, registrars, lawyers, politicians, banksters, big business representatives, media moguls and other lackeys who, all together, put up a wall of silence despite our trying many, many avenues. After the family home was stolen and business destroyed we were left close to poverty and destitution caring for 4 young daughters. Three years later not much has changed regardless of all our efforts. Where were all the followers of all the religions to help us? Or do we have to be members of those religions to receive help from others involved in them?
We have been accused of being anti - Jewish because we had posted an excerpt from James von Brun's book: Kill the Best Gentiles! http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6054 in which he blames Jews for the problems of the world. Obviously this is not our view because of what we have stated above. We do not hate anyone, whatever religion they follow. We are always open to talk to any religious leader or politician and meet with any judge, member of the Bar, experts, academics, educators etc to share the remedy we offer that heals all the divisions between MAN and MAN, and MAN and EARTH.
Today, a representative of the New South Wales Jewish Board of Deputies is threatening to close the website down, because they have decided it is anti - Jewish and that we promote racism. What has the New South Wales Jewish Board of Deputies done to end the suffering in the world? Can they show that they are concerned with the suffering of ALL men, women and children AND ARE SEEN TO BE DOING SOMETHING ABOUT IT or are they only concerned with Jewish affairs? If so, they, along with all the other religions that only care for their own, are part of the problem, not part of the solution. The man who rang Arthur today was only concerned with Jewish affairs; he was not interested in our intentions or in anybody else, just as most Christians, Muslims, Sikhs, Catholics, etc, are only interested in their own. While we separate our lives into groups, dividing our lives from others with rules, regulations, rituals, procedures, conditions and contracts, we will never solve our problems.
No matter what we in the Western World Civilisation of Commerce have been promised by our politicians, religious leaders, scientists, educators, philosophers, etc, for the past two hundred years, all we have seen is ever-increasing destruction of men, women and children and Earth. None of the so-called experts and leaders we have been taught to rely on are coming up with a solution and none of them are taking full-responsibility for the fact that they can't handle the problem. All religious books talk about end times full of destruction and suffering but why do we have to follow this program when there is an alternative to hatred, mayhem and death? Why are our leaders following the program of destruction and death rather than exploring the do no harm alternatives? It seems that any mainstream politician, priest or academic are only interested in supporting the RULES OF THE DIVIDE, that maintain the haves and the have nots. For 200+ years, 99% of the world population have been so trained to pass on their responsibility for their lives, others and Earth, that the 1% of the population that make up the leaders of the rest of us are making all the decisions leading to the destruction of all of us and Earth. Let's not forget the education system that brainwashes the 99% of the population that we are free and have equal rights while, in fact, we are feathering the nests of those at the top.
At the root of all our problems is self-centredness, an unwillingness nurtured by the Establishment that keeps us concerned only with our own needs rather than the needs of others around us and Earth. Instead of creating and releasing acts of love for those around us as gifts to benefit them and Earth, we take, take and take, until there is nothing left. The whole point of the Love for Life website is to show people the root of all our problems and to share the remedy. The extensive research library is there to attract browsers and to provide access to information not available through mainstream channels. If the New South Wales Jewish Board of Deputies can, after careful examination of our work, prove that anything we are saying is wrong, we will be happy to accept their proof. If they cannot, and they are still insistent on closing the website down, they will be showing themselves to be traitors to MAN because they are not interested in pursuing any avenue that can end the suffering in the world.
All religions, corporations and organisations that support and maintain the Western World Civilisation of Commerce are part of the problem because our civilisation is a world of haves and have nots, exclusivity, privilege, racism, violence, hatred, poverty, sickness, discrimination, abuse, starvation, homelessness, corruption, collusion, vindictiveness, social unrest, arrogance, ignorance, fear, war and chaos. While we support civilisation, we support death and destruction.
If we truly want peace and freedom for all, we have to let go of all that which keeps us divided, and come together as MAN, conscious living co-creators of creation/life. The Love For Life website offers a remedy to the problems we all face in the form of DO NO HARM COMMUNITIES (KINDOMS): http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6608 - http://loveforlife.com.au/node/3641 For more details see here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6511 and here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/3385 - We also highly recommend that everyone read the brilliant Russian books called The Ringing Cedars: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/1125 - The Love For Life homepage/front-page also provides lots of inspiring remedy based information: http://loveforlife.com.au - If you want to be kept up to date with our work please register to the Love For Life mailing list here: http://loveforlife.com.au/campaign_list We usually send two postings per month. Presently (September 2011) there are over 7000 registrations reaching over 500,000 readers across Earth. The website now (September 2011) receives up to 12 million hits per month. Since December 2006, over 100 million people have visited the Love For Life website.
Conscious Love Always
Arthur and Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
17th June 2009
Being of clear brain, heart and intention, we each declare the following to be true:
• We have no intention of ending our own lives.
• We will not tolerate suppression of truth, ideas, freedom, or our work. We stand for freedom of speech.
• We stand together to support others in the expression of truths and freedom to speak out no matter how radical those ideas may seem.
• Standing for freedom takes courage; together we shall be strong in the face of all odds.
• If it is ever claimed that we have committed suicide, encountered an unfortunate accident, died of sickness/disease, disappeared, been institutionalized, or sold out financially or in any other way to self-interested factions, we declare those claims false and fabricated.
• We testify, assert and affirm without reservation, on behalf of all those who have dedicated their lives to the ending of secrecy and the promotion of freedom of thought, ideas and expression that we shall prevail.
• We Do Not Have Multiple Personality Disorders
Arthur Cristian
Fiona Cristian
Jasmin Lily Cristian
Emma Rose Cristian
Frances Hannah Cristian
Xanthe Jane Cristian
15th December 2006 (Edited/Updated 18th September 2011)
We are turning this Love for Life Quick User Guide http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6608, also found on the Love For Life Home Page http://loveforlife.com.au, into a blog (scroll down this page below points 1 to 13 & after the Facebook links) of all the main insights of our work since March 2005, whether through articles, videos, podcasts or discussions/debates. As we do not have the time to compile everything we have written into a book, as many have suggested we do, compiling all our most important work into one area of the website is a way of providing easy access to this work so those interested are able to fully comprehend the big picture. Instead of having to find our different articles, videos, etc, in various parts of the website, it will all be accessible here (scroll down this page below points 1 to 13 & after the Facebook links), from either the Quick User Guide or the Home Page. As amateurs and posted below the Facebook links, we are currently creating and posting a series of videos called "The Dream Of Life" which covers the ground of all the Love For Life insights. We plan to have the videos completed by March 2012. Once this is behind us, our intention is to create a 2 hour or so professionally made documentary covering the body of this work. We have started recording songs, with others, that express the themes of Love For Life. These will be posted on Arthur's YouTube channel, www.youtube.com/user/ArthurLoveForLife, when they are ready. Some have already been used as the soundtrack on the first "Dream of Life" video. Also, everything we, the Cristian family, have gone through, from bank fraud and the theft of the family home to death threats and attempts on Arthur's life, is documented below too. If you, the reader, are prepared to put the effort in, you will comprehend the extent to which we have all been tricked into becoming slaves, giving up our uniqueness and our full-responsibility for life and destroying everything of life to the point where life is in danger of dying out completely. You will also comprehend the remedy to all this chaos; a remedy that requires only love for life and the determination to do what needs to be done. Though our focus is very strongly on the remedy that creates a world of freedom, truth, peace, joy, abundance and Do No Harm for all of life without loss of uniqueness or the need for slaves and rulers, we realise that it is vital to comprehend how to get there and what stops us from getting there. This is why there is so much information on the hows and whys of everything going wrong in the world today. We are not into peddling conspiracy theories, we are into routing out all forms of organised crime.
Saturday 26th November 2011
Arthur and Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
Which Unravels The Reasons For The Chaos, Mayhem and Confusion Being Experienced In The World Today, Explains The Need For "Community Immunity" and Responsibility, and Focuses On The Creation Of Kindoms - Do No Harm, Life-Sustainable Communities (As The Remedy That Heals All Mans Woes) - And How We Can Co-Create Them. For Comments, Articles And Discussions, Go Here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/3385 - Also Go Here To See Podcasts And Videos Posted by Arthur & Fiona Cristian: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/7309 - The Information Shared Comes From Inspiration, Intuition, Heartfelt-Logic And Information Gathered From Nature And Many Amazing Men And Women Along The Way. It Is Not Found In Any Books Or Channellings, Or Talked About By "Experts". Go Here To Read A Brief Synopsis Of Why We Started Love For Life: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8182
go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/1125 and for more on Eco Homes, Villages, Organic and Permaculture Gardening and Life-Sustainability, etc, go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/3641 and here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/1985 and Mikhail Petrovich Shchetinin - Kin's School - Lycee School at Tekos: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/5173
go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/5068 - LIFE is information. When we distort LIFE and then eat, drink, absorb, think, feel, hear, see, touch, taste, smell and perform these distortions, the information of LIFE, your LIFE, our LIFE, our children's lives, everyone's LIFE, is distorted.
Which Covers Topics From Health to Chemtrails/Haarp to Brain Control to Archaeology to Astronomy Geocentricity Heliocentricity to Pandemics Bird Flu Swine Flu to Fluoride to Cancer to Free Energy to Global Warming, 9/11, Bali Bombings, Aspartame, MSG, Vaccinations, Aids/HIV, Mercury, New World Order, Satanism, Religions, Cults, Sects, Symbolism, etc, etc, go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/82
(Macquarie Bank/Perpetual Limited Bank Fraud Condoned By Judges, Registrars, Barristers, Lawyers, Politicians, Public Servants, Bureaucrats, Big Business and Media Representatives - A Crime Syndicate/Terrorist Organisation) Which Prompted The Creation Of This Love For Life Website December 2006, And The Shooting And Torture Of Supporters Who Assisted Us In Reclaiming The Family Home, Joe Bryant And His Wife, Both In Their Late 70's, go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/5 And Read Some Of Our Email Correspondence With Lawyer Paul Kean - Macedone Christie Willis Solari Partners - Miranda Sydney May 17th-June 27th 2006: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/7300
go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/australian_stories (If you have a story you would like us to put up, we would love to here from you:
action @ loveforlife.com.au)
Evidence Revealing How Victims Did Not Break The Peace, Caused No Crime or Harm, There Were No Injured Parties. Documenting Incontrovertible Evidence Demonstrating How The Powers That Be (PTB) And Their Lackeys Will Break All The Laws They Are Supposed To Uphold. They Will Kidnap, Intimidate, Terrorise, Rape, Pillage, Plunder And Lie And Take Responsibility For None Of It. All Part Of Their Tactics Of Using Fear And Trauma To Keep Us In Our Place. Relatives Of Those Under Their Radar Are Also Not Safe From Attack And Intimidation. All Starting From A $25 Fine For Not Voting And A $65 Fine For Not Changing A Dog Registration. We Do Not Have Freedom And Can Only Appear To Have Freedom If We Comply. Regardless How Small The Matter The PTB Throw Hundreds Of Thousands Of Dollars Away To Enforce Their Will.... Go Here:
Fiona Cristian Reply To State Debt Recovery Office - Part One to Part Ten - From 17th October 2008 And Still Continuing:
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6319 or
Fiona Cristian Reply To State Debt Recovery Office
Part One: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/5742 - From 17th October 2008
Part Two: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6135 - From 18th December 2008
Part Three: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6295 - From 9th January 2009
Part Four: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6296 - From 14th January 2009
Part Five: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6375 - The Sick Puppy - From 20th February 2009
Part Six: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6390 - Police Officers, Sheriff’s Officers, Tow Truck Driver and State Debt Recovery Office Blatantly Ignore the Law To Rape, Pillage and Plunder The Private Property Of Fiona Cristian - From 11th March 2009
Part Seven: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6445 - Affidavit Of Truth - Letter To The Queen + Australia: Fascism is Corporatism - From 30th March 2009
Part Eight: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6652 - The Pirates Auction And The Ghost Of VSL386 - From 4th April 2009
Part Nine: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/7073 - Arthur Cristian's Letter To Pru Goward MP - From 15th December 2009
Part Ten: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/7500 - Should We Be In Fear Of Those Who Claim To Protect Us? "Roman Cult" Canon Law - Ecclesiastical Deed Poll - The Work Of Frank O'Collins - From 13th October 2010
go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/895 - For Common Law, Democracy, Constitution, Trial By Jury, Fee Simple, etc, go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/category/main/law-articles-documents
go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/banks
go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/tracker
go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/video_dvd
go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/content/06/12/05/love-life-legal-disclaimer
go here: Part One: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6616 Part Two: THE STEVE JOHNSON REPORT AND VIDEO: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6665 and Part Three: Latest Update On James Von Brunn: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6673
Conscious Love Always
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
action @ loveforlife.com.au
www.loveforlife.com.au
0418 203204 (int: 0011 61 418 203204)
PO Box 1320 Bowral 2576 NSW Australia
Arthur Cristian
Create Your Badge
Love For Life Discussions - Why Aren't We Free? How Can We Be Free?
Promote your Page too
Recent comments
8 hours 30 min ago
8 hours 55 min ago
2 days 14 hours ago
5 days 17 hours ago
1 week 1 hour ago
1 week 1 day ago
1 week 2 days ago
2 weeks 12 hours ago
2 weeks 13 hours ago
2 weeks 2 days ago