HERE'S ONE OF THE BEST EXAMPLES OF A PRIVATE SETTLEMENT I HAVE SEEN + New Speed Cameras Enrage Arizona Drivers

HERE'S ONE OF THE BEST EXAMPLES OF A PRIVATE SETTLEMENT THAT I HAVE SEEN. THE PARTY INVOLVED KNEW THEIR STUFF, ACTED AS A CREDITOR & CONTROLLED THE SITUATION & DICTATED THE TERMS OF THE AGREEMENT. EXCELLENT RESULT. BY THE WAY, THAT DOESN'T MEAN I CONDONE BREAKING (REAL) LAWS. I DON'T AGREE WITH ABUSES OF POWER OR OBVIOUS COMMERCIAL RAPE, PILLAGE & PLUNDER

Marko

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear .........................

Well, we have had a busy week trying to restore all our Testimonials. We have a lot of them back up again but we are still trying the get the remaining ones back up which show beyond any shadow of a doubt that, no matter what state you live in and no matter what unjust and unlawful traffic fine you have received, if you follow our system then you can and will win!

In in the midst of all of this, we received the following e-mail which represents everything that we try and get across to our Members and Subscribers. People question us all the time as to whether our information really works or not, they tell us they don't want to elect to go to court because they are scared and we tell them that, very often, just because you elect to go to court does not mean that you will actually have to run your case. And finally, people are constantly asking us what happens if they lose and what about being stung with extra costs etc. Well, the following testimonial should clear all of that up for you and more. The guy below did have to fight to defeat his unjust and unlawful fine but, in the end, they not only withdrew the case but had to pay him for his time!

-----------------------------------------------

Hi ASF and readers,

Twelve months ago I started to fight a parking fine issued by Sutherland Shire Council. The usual replies and denials occurred and the State Debt Recovery Office became involved. After two annulment applications later the matter went before the local court for mention. The Magistrate was not happy with my knowledge and ability to self represent she even threatened to deny my case if I did not consent to the courts legal ability to hear this case (not a court of competent jurisdiction) so I replied " your court has the ability to hear this case how ever only a verdict in favour of the defendant can be handed down other wise the court would appear to show bias in this instance and this is the reason why a court of competent jurisdiction is required so as to remove any bias" how ever she pondered and had no choice but to allow the matter go to a Hearing with two(2) hours allocated for this matter. The SDRO said they did not require two hours, the Magistrate disagreed.

Two weeks before the hearing date the Sutherland Shire Council wrote to me advising that they would not be pursuing the matter any further but warned me they will retain this information if I breach any council laws in the future.The SDRO then rang to advise me they have elected to drop the matter due to the Councils decision to cease any further action and I would not be required to attend court in this matter.

I advised both the Council and SDRO that this hearing was under my control and I was the only party that had the authority to cancel this court action and if both the Council and SDRO wished to have me agree to their request for this matter to be dropped they would have to pay compensation for my costs being:

1. 2 x annulment application fees
2. Postage and stationary
3. 1 x days wages for two defendants

The SDRO officer spoke to his manager and they have agreed and have put this agreement in writing and have advised the necessary authorities that this matter has been settled out of court through a private agreement.

SO TO ALL READERS OF ASF PLEASE REMEMBER THE SECRET TO ALL THIS IS:

1. KNOW YOUR INFORMATION
2. DON'T BACK DOWN AND SUPPORT YOUR ARGUMENT
3. ASK FOR YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS TO BE GRANTED
4. SEEK COMPENSATION AT ALL STAGES TO LET THEM KNOW THEY WERE WARNED ABOUT COSTS FROM THE START.

Regards
Martin

-----------------------------------------------

So please, as this e-mail clearly shows you, there is absolutely nothing to fear about fighting your fines and, as you will see below, there is every reason to object to every fine and fight back!

So, why is it important to fight back against every fine and what can you really hope to achieve by doing so. Well, apart from the obvious - which is a victory similar to the one that was clearly outlined in the e-mail above, which is further supported by the numerous similar reports on our Testimonials page - http://www.aussiespeedingfines.com/pages/Testimonials.html - you can also play your role in a much bigger picture that will help positively affect all Australian motorists. The article below shows that, when everyone bands together and send sends a united message, then changes can and will happen!

New speed cameras enrage Arizona drivers


An attempt to introduce UK-style fixed speed cameras in America has ended in a public revolt, with motorists binning speeding tickets worth $90 million (£60 million).

Many Americans regard the speed cameras as an unconstitutional tax collection method and have flatly refused to pay the fines Photo: PA

Published: 7:00AM GMT 11 Jan 2010

The Arizona scheme, which was the first statewide effort to bring speed camera enforcement to the US, is now on the verge of bankruptcy and could be dumped.

Many Americans, including judges and elected officials, regard the devices as an unconstitutional tax collection method and have flatly refused to pay the fines, the Times reports.

"I see all the cameras in Arizona completely coming down," Shawn Dow, who is leading the public revolt via his chairmanship of Arizona Citizens Against Photo Radar, told the paper. "The citizens of Arizona took away the cash cow of Arizona by refusing to pay." He is now trying to get the cameras banned in November's elections.

Although about 700,000 tickets have been issued since Arizona's 76-camera plan was rolled out last year, a mere $37 million of the $127 million in fines and surcharges has been collected. That is because Arizonans have realised that they can simply ignore tickets sent to them in the post, and the authorities cannot prove that they have received them. Unless the tickets are served in person something Arizona cannot afford to do they become void after three months.

Motorists have shown their opposition to the machines in other ways, placing large cardboard boxes over them, decorating them with sticky notes, attacking them with pickaxes and, in one case, setting off the cameras while standing in front wearing a monkey mask.

The company hired to install Arizona's cameras, Redflex, is under financial pressure, because it invested $16 million upfront in the equipment. But it says it is persevering. "Redflex is in this for the long haul," it said.

Link to this article: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/6964400/New-s...

--------------------------

Now, the reality is that if they can achieve this in the US then we can achieve it here as well, we just have to get more people to fight back. We already have a page dedicated to informing motorists why speed cameras actually cause accidents rather than stop them and you can read this important information and add your name to our on-line petition - to have all speed cameras removed - via the following link - http://www.aussiespeedingfines.com/pages/Petition-To-Remove-Cameras.html

But, that's only the start because, as we explain on our Vision for the Future page - http://www.aussiespeedingfines.com/pages/Vision-for-the-Future.html - the reality is that until the money stops rolling in "they" simply will not take notice. Now, every so often, we still get some mis-guided people e-mailing us who have bought into the media propaganda that speeding fines are still somehow something to do with road safety and revenue raising is simply a by product. Well, let us share with you a few stories that will well and truly put that to rest.

This first story comes from Adelaide and shows that the majority of speed cameras have not been installed in blackspot areas, as they are supposed to be instead, they have been installed in the areas that collect the most revenue. http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/story/0,22606,26596155-5006301,00.htm... The 11th paragraph says it all - "This lays waste to the Government's claims that speed cameras are about saving lives."

On a similar note, the Assistant Commissioner of the Victoria Police is forced to admit that the new "Anti-Hoon" laws simply do not work - http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=1000851 You will notice that the media very cleverly bury this telling fact in the midst of what is clearly a very sad and tragic story but the fact remains that the current so-called "Road Safety Policies" are simply not working.

And yes, in case you were wondering, this is the very same Assistant Commissioner of Police who fronted all the TAC ads over Christmas telling everyone how dangerous speed is and then covered up the fact that he got a speeding ticket himself - http://news.ninemsn.com.au/national/1000042/top-traffic-cop-kept-speedin... There are so many comments we could make here but we will keep to the facts and leave our opinions out of it. Given Assistant Commissioner Lay's prominent position both in the Victoria Police Force and as the face of all the TAC ads, it would be fair to assume that he would be the most careful and conscientious driver on the road - after all, he would hate to have a story get out about him speeding and going against the very campaign he put his face to. So, if he did, in fact, get a speeding ticket, despite being so careful and conscientious, it tells you one of two things - either the speed limits are set so artificially low that even the most careful driver in the state cannot stick to the speed limit and/or the speed camera that detected him allegedly speeding is clearly as faulty as all the other speed cameras out there because surely Mr Lay, of all people, would not speed! We'll let you be the judge but, either way, rest assured that if Mr Lay can get a speeding fine then it is all but inevitable for you.

So, we know that speed cameras do not have anything to do with road safety, we know that they are often not even set up in blackspots - but are clearly installed simply to raise as much revenue as possible - and now we know that even Victoria's top traffic cop can get a fine so, what can you do to protect yourself against the current corrupt and ineffective system? You can go to our Memberships page - http://www.aussiespeedingfines.com/pages/Memberships.html - and grab a copy of our e-book now and urge everyone else you know to do the same. Because, as we highlighted in the story above from Arizona, if people start fighting back then we really can make a difference.

As always, we would urge you to pass this e-mail onto everyone you know and please, tell people to get our e-book before they get a fine because that way, they are fully protected against the inevitable. Remember too, the Australia Day long weekend is only 24 hours away and you can rest assured that the mobile cameras and cops will well and truly be out in force to collect as much revenue as they can on this last holiday period for a while.

Also, to help us spread the word and get every motorist fighting back against these unjust and unlawful fines, we still have business cards and bumper stickers available for anyone who would like to help us get our information "out there" - to the people who need it. So, if you're interested in helping make a difference, please just e-mail us your postal address and we will send them your way.

We would like to leave you with one last story which highlights the absolute absurdity of the current system and how the so-called "authorities" will use the media to great lengths to try and make a point - even if that point make absolutely no sense. Before reading the following story, please remind yourself that Assistant Commissioner Lay admitted that the anti-hoon laws were not working - http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/national/lamborghini-impounded-under-ho...

So, despite Mr Lay's admissions, the fools in Perth think they can send some kind of a message because the car concerned is a Lamborghini. Now, what kind of message does that possibly send except that they are cold, heartless idiots! How on earth can taking someone's car when he has clearly done nothing wrong send any kind of road safety message? They didn't have much credibility before but this pretty much eliminates it all-together. Please, if anyone knows the doctor concerned, please tell him to contact us so we can get him back his car.

Anyway, thanks again for your continued support and please keep the testimonials and stories coming so we can keep all our Members up to date. And, make sure you keep a keen eye out for the revenue collectors this long weekend.

As always, take care out there.

The Team at Aussie Speeding Fines: www.aussiespeedingfines.com

Comments

The Good Guys Who Protect The Status Quo Comment by Pedro Alfaro

Pedro Alfaro originally posted this comment [http://loveforlife.com.au/content/10/01/22/good-guys-who-protect-status-quo-arthur-cristian-love-life-22nd-january-2010#comment-2165 - Sat, 01/23/2010 - 11:25 — Pedro Alfaro], copied and pasted below, under this article (The Good Guys Who Protect The Status Quo By Arthur Cristian Love For Life 22nd January 2010: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/7138). This article has no relevance to his argument so we have relocated his comment here which is more closely aligned to his argument about Admiralty Law. We have since deleted Pedro's original post/comment (link provided above).

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
25th January 2010 8.10pm

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sat, 01/23/2010 - 11:25 — Pedro Alfaro

The Good Guys Who Protect The Status Quo

Arthur, it would appear that you also have been brainwashed, with the BULLSHIT of Admiralty Law for which the CON ARTISTS are making thousands of dollars out of suckers that buy the rubbish.

The so called ADMIRALTY LAW EXPERTS have NOT even provide a single case to support the bullshit and NO Evidence have bee provided to support the Allegations made by the Con Artist. You and your wife used to Admiralty Law Bullshit and you got no benefits or relief out of it and you ended up with one of your vehicles being taken up for action by the Sheriffs and that was All as the result of the Admiral Law Expert Bullshit and you are well aware of that and still you continue being brainwashed by the their Bullshit.

It is true that in Australia there is Big Corruption, but it works because of the corrupt Judges, Politicians Public Servants and Lawyers are involved in it. But the CON ARTISTS selling the Admiral Law Bullshit are not there helping people they are there for the MONEY and I have many cases where the Bullshit of Admiralty Law has NOT worked and the people ended up in Jail or in bigger problems buy the Bullshit Advice given by CON ARTISTS passing themselves as Admiral Law Experts selling RUBBISH for which the BULLSHIT they sell is Not worth the paper written on.

That is the biggest EVIDENCE that you must look at both sides of the coin and WAKE UP from the BRAINWASHING you too are under, because you did Not buy Solutions you have purchased BULLSHIT and Rubbish that does Not work and by attacking the actions of other people you are disclosing the Brainwashing yourself is under. What you are doing is dividing the people and not working to help bring about a real solution to the Corruption, that is infecting the whole World.

By your actions you demonstrate that is you the one that has been BRAINWASHED.

Pedro Alfaro Australinews.com

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: The Strange Ways Of Pedro Alfaro
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 16:40:22 +1100
From: Love For Life Campaign
Reply-To: action @ loveforlife.com.au
Organization: Love For Life
To: Tech Support
CC: Bruno, Leo

Hi Tech Support
Pedro Alfaro posted this verbose/aggressive comment today (details below) in the Love For Life website.

I need to relocate this post unedited/as is to a more appropriate suitable relevant location/article
(say this one: HERE'S ONE OF THE BEST EXAMPLES OF A PRIVATE SETTLEMENT I HAVE SEEN + New Speed Cameras Enrage Arizona Drivers http://loveforlife.com.au/content/10/01/22/heres-one-best-examples-priva... )
because where its currently posted/linked, the article has nothing to do about admiralty law and con artists etc etc.

Once its relocated I will inform all the admiralty law boys around the globe and see if a healthy discussion ensues!!!!!
Love Arthur

The Good Guys Who Protect The Status Quo:
http://loveforlife.com.au/content/10/01/22/good-guys-who-protect-status-...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

24/01/2010 7:38 AM

Email received from Pedro Alfaro

Hello Arthur love for Life

It appears that you are NOT so true to your words about Comments which I have made in the Love For Life Post

The Good Guys Who Protect The Status Quo

By Arthur Cristian
Love For Life

22nd January 2010

I note that on an email you sent to me on 5/01/2110 Time 12.52PM you stated as follows:

Hi Pedro
We live for a certain direction that we follow every day. We do not waver from this path. However, we accommodate almost everyone else's agenda's, needs, directions, points-of-view, philosophies, etc, as we promote freedom-of-speech and to demonstrate that we are not arrogant or ignorant of the work and beliefs/opinions of others etc, regardless if we agree with them or not. Due to this attitude we are respected by many (millions) around the globe today. With the many thousands of comments received in the love for life website since Dec 2006 we have only deleted 3 or 4. We sanitise foul language and names (sometimes) but that is about the extent of our tampering of other peoples comments. All the abuse, harassment, attitudes, differing points of view etc, etc, we have received (often personally) are left on-line for all-to-see AS IS.

We don't agree with Peter Spencer's direction nor anyone else promoting fee simple, constitution, government, rule-of-law, democracy, etc, etc...... but we don't shut them out either. Unfortunately, almost everyone else shuts us out, ignores/rejects our work. Very few websites have put up our love for life articles etc in their website. But things are starting to change, more and more people are taking notice and more and more websites are now promoting our views, regardless if they agree or not. We guess we are just silent patient leaders (inspiration/direction) treading very lightly on the earth.

All the best
Arthur & Fiona

On 23 January 2010 I made a Comment on the Post The Good Guys Who Protect The Status Quo Published 22/01/2010 and which stated as follows:

Arthur, it would appear that you also have been brainwashed, with the BULLSHIT of Admiralty Law for which the CON ARTISTS are making thousands of dollars out of suckers that buy the rubbish.

The so called ADMIRALTY LAW EXPERTS have NOT even provide a single case to support the bullshit and NO Evidence have bee provided to support the Allegations made by the Con Artist. You and your wife used to Admiralty Law Bullshit and you got no benefits or relief out of it and you ended up with one of your vehicles being taken up for action by the Sheriffs and that was All as the result of the Admiral Law Expert Bullshit and you are well aware of that and still you continue being brainwashed by the their Bullshit.

It is true that in Australia there is Big Corruption, but it works because of the corrupt Judges, Politicians Public Servants and Lawyers are involved in it. But the CON ARTISTS selling the Admiral Law Bullshit are not there helping people they are there for the MONEY and I have many cases where the Bullshit of Admiralty Law has NOT worked and the people ended up in Jail or in bigger problems buy the Bullshit Advice given by CON ARTISTS passing themselves as Admiral Law Experts selling RUBBISH for which the BULLSHIT they sell is Not worth the paper written on.

That is the biggest EVIDENCE that you must look at both sides of the coin and WAKE UP from the BRAINWASHING you too are under, because you did Not buy Solutions you have purchased BULLSHIT and Rubbish that does Not work and by attacking the actions of other people you are disclosing the Brainwashing yourself is under. What you are doing is dividing the people and not working to help bring about a real solution to the Corruption, that is infecting the whole World.

By your actions you demonstrate that is you the one that has been BRAINWASHED.

Pedro Alfaro

The fact that you have not approved my comment shows very clear that you not only have two faces but also double standards and your statement :

However, we accommodate almost everyone else's agenda's, needs, directions, points-of-view, philosophies, etc, as we promote freedom-of-speech and to demonstrate that we are not arrogant or ignorant of the work and beliefs/opinions of others etc, regardless if we agree with them or not. Due to this attitude we are respected by many (millions) around the globe today. With the many thousands of comments received in the love for life website since Dec 2006 we have only deleted 3 or 4. We sanitise foul language and names (sometimes) but that is about the extent of our tampering of other peoples comments. All the abuse, harassment, attitudes, differing points of view etc, etc, we have received (often personally) are left on-line for all-to-see AS IS.

Demonstrate that you have two faces and are not really true to your statement and I think that the Public would be very Interested to know about it.

Pedro Alfaro

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

24/01/2010 10:45 AM

A copy of the email sent to Tech Support (see above) The Strange Ways Of Pedro Alfaro Sat, 23 Jan 2010 16:40:22 +1100
Was forwarded to Pedro Alfaro to let him know what was going on.

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

25/01/2010 8:45 PM

Email received from Pedro Alfaro

You are welcome to do whatever youu like Arthur, if you think that I am scared by ABN: ......... sanitised .............
Entity name: ................... sanitised ...............
Entity type: Individual/Sole Trader
GST status: Not currently registered for GST
Main business location
State: ............. sanitised..............
Postcode: ......... sanitised.......

Or by your so all the admiralty law boys around the globe you are very much mistaken.

Further be aware that I will not hesitate to Sue ........................sanitised .................... ............ and you for DEFAMATION if you make any FALSE ALLEGATIONS against me and I will make sure that LOVE FOR LIFE IS NO MORE !!!!

Have a Grate Long weekend

Pedro Alfaro

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

25/01/2010 8:45 PM

We also forwarded Pedro Alfaro's original post/comment (see above - Sat, 01/23/2010 - 11:25 — Pedro Alfaro) to a Love For Life mail list - asking those interested in Admiralty Law to post a comment.

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

26th January 2010 9:08 AM

Email received from Pedro Alfaro

Arthur you have made the bigest mistake of your life. If you think I m scared by you posting my photo and my details from Australinews, think again. I will now sue the hell out of you and Love for Life and of your website service provider.
I will serve the documents ASAP on ALL parties.

Have a good day

Pedro Alfaro

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

After receiving the above threats from Pedro Alfaro - australinews.com we have now posted this below
9.59am 26th January 2010 - Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life

We have also updated this posting:
http://loveforlife.com.au/content/10/01/22/heres-one-best-examples-priva...

There is no defamation coming from any of us (fiction or not); website, webmaster, website service provider, Fiona Cristian, Arthur Cristian.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

UPDATE

Another Email received from Pedro Alfaro - australinews.com

26th January 2010 12:27 PM

FINAL LEGAL NOTICE

ATTENTION: LOVE FOR LIFE AND BN: ........................ sanitised ..................
Entity name: ................... sanitised ...............
Entity type: Individual/Sole Trader
GST status: Not currently registered for GST
Main business location
State: ............. sanitised..............
Postcode: ......... sanitised.......

TAKE NOTICE that Unless by 7PM, on 26 January 2010 the Link to Australinews.com which is in the post below is taken off, LEGAL ACTIONS would be taken.

HERE'S ONE OF THE BEST EXAMPLES OF A PRIVATE SETTLEMENT I HAVE SEEN + New Speed Cameras Enrage Arizona Drivers
Fri, 01/22/2010 - 22:58 — Arthur Cristian

Pedro Alfaro

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

26th January 2010 4:41 PM

Not wanting to waste any more time feeding this totally unproductive exchange, we have removed everything about Pedro Alfaro and his website - the banner and the "About Us" section (about Pedro) and the link he complained about - bar the comments he posted and the comments relating to his postings. We mean no harm to Pedro and have never done anything to harm him. We thought he might enjoy the exposure of his website to the 6 million plus strikes Love for Life is going to receive for the month of January, 2010, but it seems not.

Good luck, Pedro, and we hope you realise that we and other freedom fighters are not your enemy. Many of us are now working together seeking remedy, whatever our differences of opinion, and it is this coming together of men and women that will defeat the system. There is now a very strong core of us putting our energy into remedy rather than expending our energy on petty disagreements and character assassinations.

Fiona and Arthur Cristian,
Love for Life

Love is an irresistible force that wears down all resistance
Love always finds a way
Let love love us so we can love love
Then we are that irresistible force of love that wears down all resistance

Arthur & Fiona Cristian

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

9.59am 26th January 2010

Taken from Pedro Alfaro's Current Website, currently available for public view over the internet

[4.45pm 26th January 2010 - At the demand of Pedro Alfaro (see postings above) All information taken from Pedro's website Australinews.com and posted here has now been removed - Fiona and Arthur Cristian - Love For Life

Pedro Alfaro - "Somewhat Misguided"

Mr Alfaro appears to be somewhat misguided, extremely self-opinionated and insulting, he does not believe admiralty law is in situ or that it is the power by which control is maintained, he is entitled to his opinion, but not foist it on everyone, nor does he have to insult people.

The question that requires an answer is, do the government or the powers that be operate under common law? NO, and a resounding NO at that, you see for common law to prevail it requires that there would have to be an injury, damage or loss for a claim to be made.

Contracts are not valid in a common law jurisdiction, they are not recognised. So when you are accused of breaking the Road Traffic Act (or similar) what have you broken? Is there a damage? Is there an injury? Is there a loss? No, you have broken a contract, your vessel did not comport to port authority regulations (yes port authority), check in your state which department controls the ports and you will find that they control the rivers of trade on the land, you will also find that the captain (straw-man) of your vessel (car) requires a masters ticket (driving licence) to operate the trade vessel that is trafficking (goods and services for profit) along those rivers of trade (roads).

If Mr Alfaro were to research, he would find that the judiciary are also paid by the port authority.

In WA the port authority (DPI), the ministry of transport, the police, courts and judiciary are ALL under the control of the Attorney General, operating under the executive government. Chapter II of the Constitution (Commonwealth) provides the authority for the executive government existence.
The AG is the Harbour master, he enforces company rules, those rules are of the sea, alternatively known as ADMIRALTY LAW.

I am sure Mr Alfaro with his prolific use of the term BULLSHIT, might just find that he is drowning in a sea of BULLSHIT, just like so many of our fellow countrymen and women, perhaps he is a mushroom, he likes being kept in the dark and fed BULLSHIT, I for one, certainly DO NOT, so on reflection Mr Alfaro I vehemently suggest that you do some homework and research and when you are enlightened, let us know your thoughts. On a further point, I suspect that you or your forebears left their country of origin to rid themselves of despots (based on your name), only to find that you are now supporting the despots on the land commonly known as Australia, it certainly appears so, notwithstanding your rhetoric.

It also appears that you are a mouthpiece for the organ of government, you ridicule anyone and everything to promulgate your lust, yearning and desire to destroy, perhaps you are just a sad individual corporate mouthpiece, who's life is so worthless that its your intent to ruin everyone else's. I suggest that the country from which you originate may not enjoy free thinking or have the freedom of speech and expression that we enjoy, if so I pity you, merely because, you have that choice now and abuse it by insulting others integrity, knowledge, and love for their fellow men and women.

Arthur and his ilk are fighting these intolerances we now suffer in the best way that they know, the authorities have had hundreds if not thousands of years of experience in blindfolding the people, this movement is at least trying to free us from these blindfolds, you dear chap are just wanting it continued and are doing your damnedest to ensure it!

Pedro Alfaro - Message To Pedro Alfaro From Big Al The Informer

These people will never wake up to the fact that being a person, in private statute law, makes them subjects. Admiralty came in land in America circa 1857. If he would but pull Benedict on admiralty from Matthew P Bender publication and read Vol 1 and II of the 26 Volumes, he would see admiralty rules car transportation and all revenue causes.

I had wrote a counterclaim in admiralty for a Dr in South Carolina when the IRS came after him in a civil tax cause. He won that case hands down when IRS withdrew the civil cause of action. You see people who debunk admiralty have no clue of admiralty at all and this is why they all lose in tax cases. They have to, as it's mandatory, to file a counterclaim in admiralty.

They simply are ignorant of that aspect and blindly go in as a defendant. When you file a counterclaim you are now the plaintiff demanding the plaintiff who just became the defendant, to produce the contract that all admiralty claims must have. IRS, here in America, never faces a counterclaim so they win. Not even attorneys, nor do most Judges know admiralty. It is stated in the Black Diamond case they simply don't know admiralty.

The main problem is that the judges are not corrupt. All Nations have to deal in admiralty and the problem that exists is that people fall into a trap. They were at one time Man and Woman, now they are persons. The Informer tries to explain this in his new articles on www.atgpress.com that I place here for you to read and although Australia is different in some aspects. It shares the same owner and the same type corporate law all nations do.

They do not realize this.

But, there are a group of 12 in Canada that took the Informer's article PERSON and after reading it 20 plus times got the Canada Corporation people called " government" to back entirely away from them, when they do not have the big three in their ways to travel freely in their cars and trucks. The problem with most people, they do not know who they are and blindly follow " government " that really is a corporation.

http://www.atgpress.com/inform/gov080.htm
http://www.atgpress.com/inform/gov079.htm

and PERSON is here http://www.atgpress.com/inform/tx021.htm ( copied/pasted below from: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6419 )

The new Book, The Myth and The Reality - Just who owns the United States, explains better how this one man of the Biggest corporation in the world controls every nation. Simply because he owns every Nation in the world as he controls the UN and he owns all attorneys world wide with no exception. So guess who wins in his courts if the defendants don't know who they are, to argue correctly?

I attach what the Solicitor General said in 1864 here in America that gives you the fact that you better know who you are when defending you from the corporation that deems you a person/ citizen /subject of theirs.

Big Al

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

322

MILITARY GOVERNMENT.

Distinction between enemies who are subjects of a foreign government, and are therefore called" alien enemies," and those who are denizens and subjects of the United States, and being engaged in civil war, are called" public enemies. "

An alien owes no allegiance or obedience to our government, or to our constitution, laws, or proclamations. . A citizen subject is bound to obey them all. In refusing such obedience, he is guilty of crime against his country, and finds in the law of nations no justification for disobedience. An alien, being under no such obligation, is justified in refusing such obedience. Over an alien enemy, our government can make no constitution, law, or proclamation of obligatory force, because our laws bind only our own subjects, and have no extra-territorial jurisdiction.

Over citizens who are subjects of this government, even if they have so far repudiated their duties as to become enemies, our constitution, statutes, and proclamations are the supreme law of the land. . The fact that their enforcement is resisted does not make them void. It is not in the power of armed subjects of the Union to repeal or legally nullify our constitution, laws, or other governmental acts.

SOURCE: The Legal Classics Library War Powers under The Constitution of the United States 1864 tenth Ed Entered by Act of Congress In the Clerk’s Office of the District Court of the District of Massachusetts Special Edition 1997.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


PERSON

By The Informer

This article is being presented, by The Informer, to all people who call themselves "persons" when in a legal setting. The word "person" is not, in legal terms or political terms, what one wants to be. Also, as you will see the term "people" in political terminology is very bad for one who loves freedom. Such as in the phrase "We the People." This will quell and settle, once and for all, all the arguments that are flying around about the term citizen and person, that never is settled. This will also upset people that use the term Pro Se or Propria Persona. I have rung the bell many times since 1990 and still people persist, to their own detriment, to use these terms and tacitly admit they are a "person." This will undoubtedly set some guru’s back a piece that preach citizenship of a state is what you want to be. It will also set back some guru’s who preach 14thamendment, and that blacks were not persons until the 14th Amendment was conceived. The History here will show why their arguments are flawed. Of course this will inflame those guru’s to know end. But this is not directed to them but to all you "MEN" and "WOMAN" out there that don’t know what to call your selves when addressing any government in a political and legal position. I just gave you the terms to use as you are a physical man or woman reading this, are you not? The artificial you, with a name spelled in all Capital letters, cannot read but has to have a representative. That representative is you, the real live natural MAN or WOMAN and not a "PERSON," is that not correct? Don’t know how to answer this, do you? Well don’t be dismayed for you will after reading this. The truth is here for all to see. I suspect that Men and Women are so brainwashed by the spin doctors, and guru’s that have never studied this, will have a hard time believing this. This comes from a Law book used to teach in Law Schools across the Country. But you will not find it being taught in this modern era, because to do so would put a very bad crimp in government's control over the masses of people calling themselves "persons."

Do not think that after reading this you can go into any court and they will say, my gosh you are right we have no control over you. Just the opposite will be true and they can ask at least three questions that will stop you cold in your tracks and they will walk all over you like flies on a cow patty, because you will stammer and not be able to answer them. At that point they will know that you don't know the correct argument and you lose and BAD CASE LAW will be set. The next MAN that come in with a correct understanding will lose right off the bat because of the bad case law that you have set. I have seen this hundreds of times in the patriot community when someone with a little knowledge is very dangerous to other freedom loving MEN when jumping into water they think is two feet deep only to find it 1000 feet deep and no way to get out.

The material below comes from a 13 volume set of Law books.

This is from Vol. XIII AMERICAN LAW AND PROCEDURE. JURISPRUDENCE AND LEGAL INSTITUTIONS. By James De Witt Andrews LL.B. (Albany Law School), LL.D. (Ruskin University) from La Salle University. I have bolded the footnotes as they may be mixed within some paragraphs, to separate them from the main text so it is not confusing. Starting at the end of section 63;

"Jeremy Bentham, in his remarks in reference to the inexact use of language by Blackstone in pages 47 and 49 of the Commentaries, says: "When leading terms are made to chop and change their several significations, sometimes meaning one thing, sometimes another, at the upshot perhaps nothing, and this in the compass of a paragraph, one may judge what will be the complexion of the whole context" (31).

64. The legal conception of leading words. Inasmuch as the word person, man, thing, property, rights, wrongs and actions are leading terms constituting the designation of departments of the corpus juris, it will be impossible to obtain clear conceptions of subjects connected with these words until an understanding is agreed upon as to the sense in which these terms are used. If we arrive at the meaning of these words intended by Blackstone and make the same clear, we will have a better idea of his method and perhaps a better opinion of it, and at the same time will be able to show the distinction between the same words in the Roman, the English and in American law.

Blackstone apparently uses the Roman word persona as synonymous with the English word "person," and the latter word interchangeably with "individual" and "man," whereas he might have avoided all confusion by a closer adherence to that which he professed to follow.

65. The word "person" defined. Gaius says "De Juris divisione" [the divisions of the law] immediately preceding his division of the law; then follows, "De conditione hominm" [meaning the condition or status of men]. In the Institutes "De jura personarum" precedes the expression "all our law relates either to persons, or to things, or to actions,... The words persona and personae did not have the meaning in the Roman which attaches to homo, the individual, or a man in the English; it had peculiar reference to artificial beings and the condition or status of individuals.(33)

33. Professor John Austin’s view.—"Many of the modern civilians have narrowed the Import of the term ‘person’ as meaning a physical or natural person. They define a person thus: ‘homo, cure statu sue censlderatus;, a qauman being, invested with the condition of status., And, In this definition, they use the term status in a restricted sense, as including only those conditions which comprise rights and as excluding conditions which are purely onerous and burthensome, or which consist of duties merely. According to this definition, human beings who have no rights are not persons, but things, being classed with other things which have no rights residing in themselves, but are merely the subjects of rights residing in others. Such, in the Roman law, down to the age of the Antonlnes, was the position of the slave." Austin’s Jur., vol 1, 358.

The signification in Our Jurisprudence .... The word ‘Person,’ in its primitive and natural sense, signifies the mask with which actors, who played dramatic pieces in Rome and Greece, covered their heads. These pieces were played in public places. and afterwards in Such vast amphitheaters that it was impossible for a man to make himself heard by all the spectators. Recourse was had to art; the head of each actor was enveloped with a mask, the figure of which represented the Part he was to play, and it was so contrived that the opening for the emission of his voice made the sounds clearer and more resounding, vox personabat, when the name persona was given to the instrument or mask which facilitated the resounding of his voice. The name persona was afterwards applied to the part itself which the actor had undertaken to play, because the face of the mask was adapted to the age and character of him who was considered as speaking, and sometimes it was his own portrait. It is in this last sense of personage, or of the part which an individual plays, that the word persona is employed in jurisprudence, in opposition to the word man, homo. When we speak of a person, we only consider the state of the man, the part he plays in society, abstractly, without considering the individual".

1 Bouvier’s Institutes, note 1.

Austin’s Jur., 362.
See 4 Harv. Law Rev., 101,
Austin’s Jur., 363.

The word "homo" corresponds to the English word "man," and, as the Romans expressed it, "unus homo sustinet plures personas;" i.e., one man has many persons, or sustains many status, or many different conditions (34) AUSTINS JUR., 362)

Austin says: "The term ‘person’ has two meanings, which must be carefully distinguished. It denotes a man or human being; or it signifies some condition borne by a man (35 See Harvard Law Revues 101). A person (as meaning a man) is one or individual, but a single or individual person (meaning a man) may sustain a number of persons (meaning condition or status)" (36 Austins Jur., 363).

Notice that this meaning is not so broad as that given by Ortolan. It does not include artificial persons. Again, he says: "As throwing light on the celebrated distinction between jus rerum and jus personarum, phrases which have been translated so absurdly by Blackstone and others,--rights of persons and rights of things, jus personarum did not mean law of persons, or rights of persons, but law of status, or condition. A person is here not a physical or individual person, but the status or condition with which he is invested. It is a remarkable confirmation of this that Gauis, in the margin purporting to give the title or heading of this part of the law, has entitled it thus: De conditione hominum; and Theophilus, in translating the Institutes of Justinian from Latin into Greek, has translated jus personarum . . . diviso personarum; understanding evidently by persona . . . not an individual or physical person, but the status, condition or character borne by physical persons. This distinctly shows the meaning of the phrase jus per sonarurn, which has been involved in impenetrable obscurity by Blackstone and Hale. The law of persons is the law of status or condition; the law of things is the law of rights and obligations considered in a general manner, or as distinguished from these peculiar collections of rights and obligations which are styled conditions and considered apart.

A moment’s reflection enables one to see that man and person cannot be synonymous, for there cannot be an artificial man, though there are artificial persons. Thus the conclusion is easily reached that the law itself often creates an entity or a being which is called a person; the law cannot create an artificial man, but it can and frequently does invest him with artificial attributes; this is personality, which we see and by which we are affected.

The law does not distinguish between men except by their personality, as king or magistrate, or as parent or husband or wife, etc. While the idea may be difficult for the tyro to grasp, the personality, i.e., this condition or status of a many is entirely the creation of the law. By nature all men are created free and equal, i.e., of equal rank, equal rights; but the law does not look upon all men as equal, though in the law of the United States all men have equal civil rights (39).

The question is asked, Who is that man? The reply would be, that is the king or lord so and so, or the chief justice or the president or governor. But what is the name of this personage? The name indicates the man, the title, rank or legal standing of the person.

The word "persons" denoted certain conditions of rank or status with which a man was clothed by law. To adopt the language of the same author, "the term ‘person,’ as denoting a condition or status, is therefore equivalent to character (40). It signified, originally, a mask worn by a player, and distinguished the character which he represented from the other characters in the play. From the mask which expressed the character, it was extended to the character itself. From characters represented by players, or from dramatic characters, it Was further extended by a metaphor to conditions or as status. For men, as subjects of law, are distinguished conditions, just as players, perform by their respective conditions, just as players, performing a play are distinguished by the several persons which they respectively enact or sustain" (41). As we shall see, the word had a still broader meaning.

"A slave," says Holland, "having, as such, neither rights or liabilities, had in Roman law, strictly speaking, no ‘status,’ ‘caput,’ or ‘persona.’ On the day of his manumission, says Modesfinus, ‘incipit stature habere.’ Before manumission, as we read in the Institutes, ‘nullurn caput habuit’" (42).

The following is the explanation given by Mr. Sandars in Ms translation of the Institutes: "The word persona had, in the usage of the Roman law, a different meaning from that which we ordinarily attach to the word ‘person.’ Whoever or whatever was capable of having, and being subject to, rights, was a persona. All men possessing a reasonable will would naturally be personae; but not all those who were, physically speaking, men, were personae. Slaves, for instance, were not in a position to exercise their reason and will, and the law, therefore refused to treat them as personae."

"On the other hand, many personae had no physical existence. The law clothed certain abstract conceptions with an existence, and attached to them the capability of having and being subject to rights. The law, for instance, spoke of the state as a persona· It was treated as being capable of having the rights and of being

[39 See Ex parte Virginia, 100 U.S. 368. 40 Hale nowhere speaks of status, but uses the term "character" or "capacity." See note 60. below.]

subject to them. These rights really belonged to the men who composed the state, and they flowed from the constitution and position of associated individuals. But, in the theory and language of law, the rights of the whole community were referred to the state, to an abstract conception interposed between these rights and the individual members of society. So, a corporation, or an ecclesiastical institution, was a persona, quite apart from the individual personae who formed the one and administered the other. Even the riscus, or the imperial treasury, as being the symbol of the abstract conception of the emperor's claims, was spoken of as a persona. The technical term for the position of an individual regarded as a legal person was status" (44).

Ortolan’s explanation of personality.(45) The substance of the above was undoubtedly taken from Ortolan’s treatment of the subject as given in his History of the Roman Law, which is submitted because it is clear and concise:

"The word ‘person’ (persona) does not in the language of the law, as in ordinary language, designate the physical man. This word in law has two acceptations: In the first, it is every being considered as capable of having or owing rights, of being the active or passive subjects of rights.

"We say every being, for men are not alone comprised therein. In fact, law by its power of abstraction creates persons, as we shall see that it creates things, which do not exist in nature.

Thus, it erects into persons the state, cities, communities, charitable or other institutions, even purely material objects, such as the fiscus, or inheritance in abeyance, because it makes of them beings capable of having or owing rights. In the inverse sense, every man in Roman law is not a person. For example, slaves were considered as the property of the master, especially under the rigorous system of primitive legislation, because they are the object and not the subject of law. This, however, did not prevent the Romans from including them in another sense in the class of persons.

"We shall therefore have to discriminate between and to study two classes of person: physical or natural persons, for which we find no distinctive denomination in Roman jurisprudence except the expressions taken from Ulpian, singularis persona; that is to say, (46) the man-person; and abstract persons, which are fictitious and which have no existence except in law; that is to say, those which are purely legal conceptions or creations.

"In another sense, very frequently employed, the word ‘person’ designates each character man is called upon to play on the judicial stage; that is to say, each quality which gives him certain rights or certain obligations-for instance, the person of 43 Slaves were not persons in the United States until after the abolition of slavery

1 Hammond’s B]k. 334, note.
44 Sandars’ Justinian, Introduction, P. 26.
45 Ortolan’s History of the Roman Law is among the best. It is, unfortunately, not easily obtained.

father; of son as subject to his father; of husband or guardian. In this sense the same man can have several personae at the same time. The last two paragraphs embrace all that Austin gives us in the quotation given above.

From what we have seen, the following conclusion may be drawn: The words persona and status were not synonymous, though very nearly so. The word "person" had two meanings:

First. Every being, artificial or natural, capable of having or owing rights.

Second. The characters, capacities, qualities or positions which the law ascribed to certain men as individuals—that is, rank, condition, capacity-status.

The technical term for the second meaning, namely, the position, quality, character which a man bears, is status.

Status is not so broad as person, but always related to physical men.

A slave had no rights, no rank, no standing, no capacity, and consequently no status. This applies, of course, only to the earlier days of Roman law, for subsequently slaves were given a standing as men.

" In the earlier days of Roman law," says Sandara "no one would have conceived this to be unnatural" (48).

In the days of Gaius, it seems, slaves are treated as persons, for he says: "Persons are freemen or slaves" (49).

In England all men were persons, and were divided into certain classes or ranks by virtue of which they had especial characters, capacities, rights, privileges and immunities; for instance, the right of magistracy’ as king, as lord, etc. These were artificial. In human societies men have certain standing, position, capacity, according as they are sovereign or subjects, parents and children, husband and wife, or citizens.

We have seen something of the etymology of the word, also its meaning and application as used in the :Roman law. We know that the word "person" is a familiar one in English literature, both in England and America. We are endeavoring to ascertain whether in the English language we have a right to oppose persons to things for the Purpose of classification of rules of law, and if thereby we convey intelligent ideas.

We know that all laws emanate from persons and also that they operate against or upon persons(50); that is, all law certainly from laws, and that the principle of classification adopted is the difference in the objects to which the rules relate.

There can be found in the Commentaries of Blackstone no definition of the word person, nor any explanation of the meaning

[46 Does not this equal "individuals?" See 10 Harvard Law Rev., 101.
47 Ortholan’s History of Roman Law, 567-68.
48 Sandals’ Justinian, Int., 27; Austin’s Jur., lect. 12, P.358 49 Galus, 1-9; Austin’s Jur., 358.]

addresses persons. So of rights. We know that rights belong to persons, and that in that sense there cannot be the rights of things. It should be borne in mind that we are endeavoring to classify the body of laws, and not the rights which are resultant intended to be ascribed to the word "person,"and the word is there used indiscriminately in the popular and legal sense, interchangeably with "man" and "individual," and also to designate artificial beings capable of having rights; and there is not the slightest hint that in using the Roman expressions there is any change intended from the Roman idea of the word "person," though he does treat under the rights of persons what he styles absolute rights, which would be called "things" in Roman law.

§ 66. Scope of the word "thing." Of things (51), which is the subject of the second book, Blackstone says: "The objects of your inquiry in this second book will be the jura rerum, or those rights which a man may acquire in and to such external things as are unconnected with his person." Why not say unconnected with him, himself? These are what the writers in natural law style the "rights of dominion or property." This is the only definition given of the words "property" ‘or "thing;" that is, the jura rernm equals those rights which a man may acquire in and to external thlngs. Otherwise put, the rights of things are rights which a man may acquire in and to things unconnected with his person; and these are what writers in natural law style property; yet in the treatment of this subject the learned commentator treats the subject of contracts, the main feature of which is its obligation, or, in other words, the power which the law affords one person of enforcing it by . . . ..

WE now go further into the book and this is what it has to say about you people who want so much to be a part of the body politic and want the Constitution as your God and then claim that you are free from the tether of government. IT AIN"T GONNA HAPPEN AND YOU HAVE BEEN SUCKERED IN HOOK, LINE AND SINKER WHEN CLAIMING SO AND ARE COMPLETELY DOMINATED BY THEM.

50. Virginia v. Rives, 100 U.S. 332; 92’ ld. 554; United States v. Harris, 106 id. 629; Civil Rights Cases, 109 id. 3. A state may in a sense fall under the designation, and laws be directed against states; but as the state acts by individuals, in the same manner it is operated upon through individuals.

51. Observe the word "chose," which will be explained hereafter. Its meaning has an important bearing on the modified meaning of both "person" and "things." Vol. XII 12

CHAPTER VIII

THE PEOPLE.

§ 104. The people: Identity. In the United States the people are brought on the stage as an acting political entity, acting, it is true, always through representatives. As expressed by Wilson, one of the signers of the Declaration of Independence: "In free states the people form an artificial person or body politic, the highest and noblest that can be known" (1 Wilson’s Works).

By "the people" of a state is meant all of the (members) which compose that state and are integral parts of it, together making a body politic (2 Penhollowv Doane, 3 Dall. 55, 93).

[PEOPLE, THIS IS A STRAIGHT OUT ADMIRALTY CASE IN CASE YOU DIDN'T KNOW AS IT DEALT WITH LAW MERCHANTS, YOU KNOW THEM AS CORPORATE ENTITIES]

The people as a corporate unit form an artificial person or body politic; thus constituted they form a moral person". "It is this person we call a state. (4 1 Wilson’s Works 321-325: 2 Wilson’s Works 321)" "There is no distinction between the people and the state" (5 Penhollow v Doane, 3 Dall 93).

It must not be forgotten that, in using the expression "the people," there is a distinction between the population of the nation, as individuals, and the same population organized under a constitution. By "the people," in this connection, we intend a body politic, a corporate unity. Because of the quality of singleness we may properly use the pronoun "it," though, this is not usual. It is hard for the citizen to lose sight of the individuals in the body; but correctly viewed, as drops of water lose their forms as drops when they mingle with the whole and become not drops, but one body, even so the citizen in his political capacity loses the civil capacity of an individual when viewed as a part of that great unit "the people."

It is the whole mass, and not a majority of the individuals composing it, which constitutes the people, and the people are to be regarded, not as an unorganized mob, but as a corporate unity composing a society (6). There are dicta to the effect that the people, when spoken of in the political sense, means only those persons having the right to vote, that is, the electors; and it is at the same time said that in the electors is vested the sovereignty (7). Thus stated, the idea does not, as we shall see, properly obtain, and is contrary to the principles of American institutions (8). Voters are but parts of the machinery of government (9). In the constitution "the people, is sometimes used to indicate persons or individuals. So in all provisions in reference to unreasonable seizures and searches. In such provision it is identical with the use in Blackstone.

6. Jameson, Const. Con. (4th ed.), pp. q8, 19, notes: Von Holst’s Con.
Law, 48, 49; Penhallow v. Doane, 3 Dall. 92.

"A distinction was taken at the bar between a state and the people of the state. It is a distinction I am not capable of comprehending. By a state forming a republic (speaking of it as a moral person), I do not mean the legislature of the state, the executive of the state, or the judiciary, but all the citizens who compose the state, and are, if I may so express myself, integral parts of it; all together forming a body politic. The great distinction between monarchies and republics (at least our republic) in general is, that in the former the monarch is considered as the sovereign, and each individual of his nation as a subject to him, though in some countries with many important special limitations. This, I say, is generally the ease, for it has not been so universally. But in a republic, all the citizens as such, are equal, and no citizen can rightfully exercise any authority over another but in virtue of a power constitutionally given by the whole community, and such authority, when exercised, is In effect an act of the whole community, which forms such body politic. In such governments, therefore, the sovereignty resides in the great body of the people, but it resides in them not as so many distinct individuals, but in their political capacity only. Thus A., B., C., and D. are citizens of Pennsylvania, and as such, together with all the citizens of Pennsylvania, share in the sovereignty of the state. Suppose a state to consist exactly of the number of 100,000 citizens, and it were practicable for them all to assemble at one time and in one place, and that 99,999 did actually assemble. The state would not be in fact assembled. Why? Because the state in fact is composed of all the citizens, not of a part only, however large the part may be, and one is wanting." Penhallow v. Doane, 3 Dall. 93.

7. Cooley’s Const. Lira. 40, citing Blair v. Rldgely, 41 Mo. 63; 97 Am:Dec. 248
.8. Wilson’s Works, App’x A, IX 566; McOrary on Elections (4th ed.), sec 13.
9. State v. Cunningham, 81 Wis. 498.

§105. Capacity. Power. Sovereignty. We may now examine the powers of the people, and in the course of this examination but little time need be spent upon theory or metaphysical discussion of what ought to be the law governing the matter, but will, as far as possible, be conferred to the practical, visible facts.

The discussion of the capacities of that person we term "the people" necessarily involves the discussion of What is termed sovereignty. Let no one suppose that this question is an impracticable one and that it has no further.

I END THIS SECTION HERE --GO TO THE NEXT SECTION 132 AND-- STARTING AT THE END OF THE PAGE WHICH CONTAINS WHAT I WANT YOU TO SEE.

"To fully appreciate the idea of sovereignty and the federal court has appellate jurisdiction of a suit by a state against an individual (13). The palpable injustice of the rule has led to several ingenious devices to avoid its application (14), such for example as the assignment of the cause of action to a person competent to sue, (e.g. a state), which, however, must be a real assignment (15).

The sufficient reason for the rule is found in the expression, "it is the written law"; the motive for it throws no light on its application (16).

§ 133. An individual contracts with a state at his peril.

It is now well settled that there is no judicial remedy in favor of an individual against a state to compel the performance of a contract (17), though it is settled that a state can pass no law impairing the obligation of a contract once made (18). The only security for state loans rests on the plighted faith of the state as a political community; that is, upon the same basis as contracts with independent governments (19). States are not, like nations, independent of each other, and are not permitted to allow the use of state names for the purpose of enforcing claims really owned by individuals.

As to torts and injuries: It is no answer to a tort or an active infringement of a right or a threatened injury that the action was taken or is proceeding under supposed official duty or by virtue of official power: such cases are not damnum absque injuria.

There you have it people. I did not highlight anything in the main text that was not already there or italicized. This is devastating against the Government of State and Federal. Do you want to find out how corrupt "your" government is? Well after this hits the net the Government will pull from the shelves of all the libraries and law schools where some of these volumes might be, just as Hitler did to the German people so they would not learn the truth. What makes you think this country’s slime balls, called government officials and the lawyers that run this country,--count the number of executive and legislative persons there are that are lawyers,-- are any different? They are not. In those countries it was brutality, here it is legality with words, but the results are the same, -- complete control of the Men and Women. But of late it has become apparent that brutality is showing its ugly head starting with IRS, ATF and DEA abuse of the people under the directives of upper level "persons" that legally can’t throw enough men and women in jail fast enough.

I’ll tell you that the law professors know this and they taught it. They can’t teach it now , by government dictate. Lawyers are only taught what the establishment wants taught. The legal profession has so much moral turpitude oozing from their pores that compared to a chicken house that hasn't been cleaned in a month, on a 100 degree day, make it smell like a bed of roses.

As Shakespeare said very eloquently, "The first thing we do is hang all the lawyers." Yes, and Virginia Colony was correct back in the 1700’s that the practice of lawyering was an offense punishable by death. They sure dropped the ball on that one.

So the problem at hand is that every statute is written with the term "person" in mind. Why, you ask? Well as I quoted in my book "The New History of America," the case of Cruden v Neale, where the court states a principle of natural law so clear that it cannot be twisted by any lawyer, that man is only bound by the laws of nature. Here is what the court stated;

" When a change of government takes place, from a monarchial to a republican government, the old form is dissolved. Those who lived under it, and did not choose to become members of the new, had a right to refuse their allegiance to it, and to retire elsewhere. By being a part of the society subject to the old government, they had not entered into any engagement to become subject to any new form the majority might think proper to adopt. That the majority shall prevail is a rule posterior to the formation of government, and results from it. It is not a rule binding upon mankind in their natural state. There, every man is independent of all laws, except those prescribed by nature. He is not bound by any institutions formed by his fellowmen without his consent." CRUDEN v. NEALE, 2 N.C. 338 (1796) 2 S.E. 70. Emphasis added.

By this very principle espoused by the court you cannot be made to "retire elsewhere" because, if anything, you retire from the corporate STATE and live upon the land of the Lord in the geographical place called North Carolina rather than the State of North Carolina. Go back and look at the Hamilton case where they said that you "* * * shall take an oath of abjuration and allegiance, or depart out of the State." Let them keep their corporate State; depart out of it. Isn't that what the Bible tells you "Come out of her?" What do you need it for? To continually be robbed by legal plunder? Not that they are going to stop if you do, because maybe, just maybe, the masses will wake up and want out also, thereby destroying the State’s power over you.

You see, the whole game is to control you by making you, the man, into a artificial entity called a "person." In ordinary street language you can use the term person. But the minute you step into ANY legal arena you CANNOT use the term "person." For to do so the other artificial person, the State, can come after another artificial character. As the court stated above "man" is not bound by other men’s laws unless he consents. You consent when you answer to any statute containing any reference to person. The clever trick is that the statute 26 USC 7701(a) of the IRC is the definition part and it says "person" means; an individual, partnership, corporation, association. Notice that all terms defining the word "person are corporate fictions. BUT, you say, individual is not a corporate fiction because am I not an individual? Yes you are in average common street terms, but in the legal arena "individual is corporate or artificial by legal definition, because "individual," in and of itself is defining an artificial thing as a "person." So how can it be a natural man? It goes against all reason and logic. The IRC Code Statute only pertains to man, who as stated above by the Professor, takes on the artificial character and becomes a "person" by legal definition. Therefore he is subject to all the legal disabilities that come with the term person and that means being subject to all the laws of the parent corporation. The parent corporation is the United States, the State is the artificial child and you are the artificial grand child. That is the best way to describe it so you can start to equate terms and meanings.

In Anderson’s Business law on the Uniform Commercial Code, I think around the sixth edition, it states that when a statute refers to artificial beings, natural people are not to be included. So, 26 USC 7701 (a) (1) uses all artificial characters to describe the artificial "person" and individual. By all reason and logic it has to be an artificial term. Just like a third grade reader shows 5 pictures and asks which one does not belong. The pictures are, a baseball, a bat, a base, a glove and a football uniform. You circle the football uniform as not fitting the idea, but the football clothes is a uniform, the same as baseball clothes is a uniform. Only one uniform fits the scheme while the other is left out, but both are uniforms. The same as individual. It is a "leading word" as the professor stated and has to be further defined the same as individual or person has to be defined. Did not the professor state the term individual and person are one in the same? Did he not also state that it is well settled in law that "person" is always an artificial person? Refresh your memory by finding that part of his statement.

The Informer

Link to this webpage: http://www.atgpress.com/inform/tx021.htm
Against The Grain Press Website: http://www.atgpress.com/atgpress/indexag.htm
The Informer Website: http://www.atgpress.com/inform/indexinf.htm

See other The Informer postings/articles here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6420 and here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6419 and here: http://www.loveforlife.com.au/node/5149

Billboard in Missouri + Message From Big Al About Pedro Alfaro

26th January 2010 4:19 PM

Big Al sent this picture - Billboard in Missouri

26th January 2010 2:07 PM

Message From Big Al Regarding Pedro Alfaro

Pedro Alfaro: A typical patriot grasping for straws. Let him self destruct. He will very shortly. Just let him rant on. He is a lost soul believing in delusions. He has no education in admiralty at all. There are a few questions that can be asked face to face. If you do it by email all he has to do is look it up and give you an answer. That won't work. Has to be face to face so he answers in 2 minutes or he is a fraud. Don't know what else to say, but I believe he is a Jesuit plant or is so delusional he is already a nut case.

Big Al
The Informer

Link to his website: http://www.atgpress.com
Link to the informers webpage:
Against The Grain Press Website: http://www.atgpress.com/atgpress/indexag.htm
The Informer Website: http://www.atgpress.com/inform/indexinf.htm

See other The Informer postings/articles here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6420 and here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6419 and here: http://www.loveforlife.com.au/node/5149

Why You Are Screwed By So Called Government That Is A Corp


Why You Are Screwed By So Called Government That Is A Corporation
A Foetus Is Not A Person In Law With Rights
But That Corporations Are Persons With Rights

By The Informer

The subject was on the US Supreme Court decision that a Foetus is not a person in law with rights, but that corporations are persons - some people have asked me why.

My answer was:

They don't know how to keep the secret from getting out that all corporations in law are persons and the people are individual corporations themselves, as we found in the Raleigh, NC archives back in 1996.

The foetus is not a person as it hasn't been born yet. But when it does, it becomes their person slave. If people only knew they weren't persons until they became a member of the corporation, things would change rather fast if they realized they could not be taxed at all for being a man or a woman. This is why the entire codes of State and United States all say person required, person liable, no person shall and on, & on, ad infinitum. So all the court is doing is trying to protect their scam. Because if they admitted the foetus was a person, the whole world of theirs would be turned upside down.

They, by their very own man made laws would or could tax that foetus and then the people are still dumbed down to know that all persons are slaves. Imagine 5 people setting up a corporation not yet born and being taxed for a corporation not yet born of the 5 people. Just the thought would then be being taxed. See what they are trying to get away from? That Foetus would be an ALIEN. The corporation is an alien until it is recorded with the Secretary of State to do business. The case of Colonial Pipeline v Joseph N Triangle 421 US 100, stated that corporations are created so the corporation, read that as United States and States, would have revenue coming in. It's toward the back of the case and you have to read it very carefully to see it.

So how can an alien be a person people would ask?

What made the foetus all of a sudden become a person?

I understand, but most people have no clue of their diabolical scam on the use of words and terms. Just look at the definition of terms of Person defined in 26 U.S.C. 7701 (a) (1). This proves corporations already were persons way back to 1866, and before then. A State is a person because it's a corporation. Now we are all being persons, you can see where an administrator (that everyone calls a judge) can make a plea for you as he is a person also representing the corporation as a person. You are both equal under their law.

Neat little scam they got going, Huh?

Now this is why the corporation can sit and rule for itself because YOU are a person also and not a man or a woman any longer, as you accepted what the corporation said that you were, a person also. That means you really don't know who you are, but what they say you are. That's why no black man ever used the 14th Amendment till 1930, yet all corporations used it from the very get go it was passed. As I said, until people understand PERSON on atgpress (http://loveforlife.com.au/content/09/03/19/informer-person-informer), they don't really know who they are, only what the corporation wants them to believe. What did Whiting say about aliens not coming under US law but persons, with Person being the subject, the member, the citizen, the voter, the slave to the corporation?

Just think; the Padleford case said man - they said person to cover their ass - was not a party to the con job and could not claim a breach of the con job as only the states could? Then if they were not a party to the con job, how can they vote for the president of the con job and then be denied the privilege to Vote? Think about that for a while. IT'S a PRIVILEGE to VOTE not a right. They did that so the Pope could install his CEO that everyone calls President.

Have I broke through their scam yet so it can be understood?

Hey, let's all go see Santa to get free toys and leave him a note telling him what we want. That is the mentality of people today. A 4th grader. How can they compete with reasoning against people with such diabolical minds who rule persons with terms and not words? Looking at 7701(a) (1), what defines a PERSON in LAW? Corporations, Individuals, Associations. Are they not all corporations? Sure are.

What is an individual?

Oh, you are?

Where is that "Individual" defined?

Right in Title 5 U.S.C. 552 it states (a) Definitions. - For purposes of this section - (1) the term "agency" means agency as defined in section 552(e) (!1) of this title; (2) the term "individual" means a citizen of the United States or an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence;

Note the TERM "individual" is a US CITIZEN.

So the TERM PERSON in tax law, uses "INDIVIDUAL" as a defining term for the term PERSON.

HELLO!!!

See how they say you are liable?

You admit to being a PERSON of character and never a Man who is an Alien. TAXPAYER and ARTIFICIAL PERSON are one in the same and all 50 statutes of US Code, say PERSON LIABLE. And therefore all "INDIVIDUAL" income tax forms specifically say any PERSON Liable must file an " INDIVIDUAL " federal income tax form. Here they mix words and terms and no one is the wiser due to dumbing down of the people for centuries.

Ok, what we have here is all neatly wrapped up in one sentence, with TERMS quoted for your demise. ALL "PERSONS" must file their "INDIVIDUAL" Federal income tax returns. If you put it in code, you can see what they are saying and the word federal is left as a word. Broken down it says this; All corporate, artificial members MUST file their US citizen contract, (Yes the word federal means contract) income, (kick back return) for the Privilege of being a corporate member.

This is what people cannot comprehend - although they can read, they don't know what terms are and believe they are words. This is why all PERSONS are incompetent and need other incompetent persons called attorneys, in their private corporation courts manned by executive administrative officers called judges who are just other incompetent persons. The case on this is ;

FEDERAL RADIO COMMISSION v. GENERAL ELECTRIC CO., 281 U. S. 464 (1930)

"In the cases just cited, as also in others, it is recognized that the courts of the District of Columbia are not created under the judiciary article of the Constitution but are legislative courts, and therefore that Congress may invest them with jurisdiction of appeals and proceedings such as have been just described..

* ** Our conclusion is that the proceeding in that court was not a case or controversy in the sense of the judiciary article, but was an administrative proceeding, and therefore that the decision therein is not review able by this court." 281 U.S. 464 (1930) 281 U.S. 464 And the follow up case is this;

Judges do not enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce Statutes and codes (FRC. V. GE 281 US 464, Keller v. PE 261 US 428, 1 Stat. 138-178);

How are they enforced? By courts that are pure, corporate administrative courts. And therein lies their Just-Us-Good-Ole-Boys-Always-Receive. It’s legal, as they are protecting the corporation from the malcontent persons that you are because you don’t know who you really are. You think you are man or woman. NO, you are not. You are a corporate person whether you like it or not.

You wanted citizenship so badly you gave up, voluntarily, all natural Law Rights for privileges of corporate membership, wherein you are a person in law and are no longer looked upon as the physical human being in legal statute law. Look to PERSON on the Informer’s article on AGPRESS.COM (http://loveforlife.com.au/content/09/03/19/informer-person-informer).

Can you find any legal statute, anywhere where MAN or WOMAN is mentioned?

I rest my case.

The Informer

See other The Informer postings/articles here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6420 and here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6419 and here: http://www.loveforlife.com.au/node/5149 -

Against The Grain Press Website: http://www.atgpress.com/atgpress/indexag.htm
The Informer Website: http://www.atgpress.com/inform/indexinf.htm

PERSON: http://loveforlife.com.au/content/09/03/19/informer-person-informer

EMERGENCY WAR POWER ACT: http://loveforlife.com.au/content/10/01/14/genesis-emergency-war-power-a...

CONSTITUTION SCAM: http://loveforlife.com.au/content/08/03/27/audio-mp3-interview-informer-...

JUST WHO OWNS THE UNITED STATES?: http://loveforlife.com.au/content/09/03/19/informer-myth-and-reality-jus...

HOW GEORGE WASHINGTON SOLD OUT AMERICANS: http://loveforlife.com.au/content/08/07/27/informer-new-history-america-...

Why You Are Screwed By So Call Government That Is A Corporation by The Informer - A Foetus Is Not A Person In Law With Rights: http://loveforlife.com.au/content/10/01/27/why-you-are-screwed-so-call-g...

THE INFORMER - The Informer is by profession a researcher of 40 years and worked for major 500 companies - Covers Admiralty Law: http://loveforlife.com.au/content/08/03/13/informer-informer-profession-...

Pedro Alfaro - Comment From Peter Colenso

Dear Arthur & Fiona

Don't let a person like Pedro take up your time, he is probably jealous of your site. We can not be divided. At the moment a third of the stock-market has been redirected to the private sector, and the Bankers used hedge funds to pull off this scam & Obama is onto them.

The International Bankers will now use this money to give themselves even more power, and to think that most of the money they stole from us was our compulsory super, how it all ended up on the stock market is beyond me.

Idiots like Pedro have made it easy for them as he is taking our minds off the game.

Lots of love
Pete

Re: Comment from Pedro Alfaro - The "BULLSHIT" Of Admiralty Law

25 January A.D. 2010

Re: Comment from Pedro Alfaro - The "BULLSHIT" Of Admiralty Law

Thanks for the note.

My response is color-coded. If the color parts don't survive the journey through the servers, let me know, and I'll use a different technique.

To summarize the color coding, red is bad; blue is good.

If you have a "funny money" system, which you do have, there, then you're dealing with an "admiralty law" -based system.

Try VERY hard not to confuse "confused minds, generally" with the reality of the fundamental choice of law. THAT part they have correct. They have no idea what to do with it, to be sure, and they can't even really tell you how we know for 100% certainty that we DO have a "Law of the Sea" -based system, but that part of these scams is quite correct.

Here's how we know, for 100% certainty, that we have a maritime- (admiralty-, "Law of the Sea"-) based system. If you did not have a maritime, Law of the Sea, system, then the people circulating the "funny money" where you are would most definitely be in jail. "Funny money," when evaluated under the Law of the Land, is, at best, fraud. If America had a governmental/commercial system based on the Law of the Land, those running the present "funny money" scam here would be charged with Treason and very likely executed. "Funny money," in a system that recognizes only honest weights and measures, is an act of war. So, again, the ONLY way the "funny money" circulates, anywhere, is due to the Law-of-the-Sea -based governmental/commercial system.

So, the author of the note (Pedro Alfaro) has a good sense for reality, at least in part. He sees that the vast majority of the "patriot" types haven't the first clue what to do with the bits and pieces of information about the law they actually understand correctly. He's justified in his frustration. HOWEVER, don't throw the baby out with the bath water!

To summarize the connections, the choice of law that goes with "funny money" is maritime, admiralty, Law of the Sea. And, there being only one other choice at this threshold level of the analysis, the choice of law that goes with honest weights and measures is the Common Law, also known as the Law of the Land.

Harmon L. Taylor
Legal Reality
Dallas, Texas

Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act 1890

26th January 2010 2:06 PM

From Debrah B

For Pedro's Interest: see: Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act 1890

1: http://www.google.com.au/search?rlz=1C1SKPC_enAU355AU356&aq=f&sourceid=c....

2: http://www.legislation.act.gov.au/a/db_1802/20030118-3678/rtf/db_1802.rt...

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: [RTF] Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act 1890 53 and 54 Vic c 27 (repealed): www.legislation.act.gov.au/a/db_1802/20030118-3678/rtf/db_1802.rtf

Australian Capital Territory
Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act 1890 53 and 54 Vic c 27 (repealed)
Republication No 2
Effective: 18 January 2003
Republication date: 18 January 2003
As repealed by Act 2002 No 49

Unauthorised version prepared by ACT Parliamentary Counsel’s Office

About this republication

The republished law

This is a republication of the Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act 1890 53 and 54 Vic c 27 (repealed) (including any amendment made under the Legislation Act 2001, part 11.3 (Editorial changes)). It also includes any commencement, amendment, repeal or expiry affecting the republished law to 18 January 2003.

The legislation history and amendment history of the republished law are set out in endnotes 3 and 4.

Kinds of republications

The Parliamentary Counsel’s Office prepares 2 kinds of republications of ACT laws (see the ACT legislation register at www.legislation.act.gov.au):
• authorised republications to which the Legislation Act 2001 applies
• unauthorised republications.

The status of this republication appears on the bottom of each page.

Editorial changes

The Legislation Act 2001, part 11.3 authorises the Parliamentary Counsel to make editorial amendments and other changes of a formal nature when preparing a law for republication. Editorial changes do not change the effect of the law, but have effect as if they had been made by an Act commencing on the republication date (see Legislation Act 2001, s 115 and s 117). The changes are made if the Parliamentary Counsel considers they are desirable to bring the law into line, or more closely into line, with current legislative drafting practice.

When preparing the authorised version of this republication amendments were not made under part 11.3 (see endnote 1).

Uncommenced provisions and amendments

If a provision of the republished law has not commenced or is affected by an uncommenced amendment, the symbol

U

appears immediately before the provision heading. The text of the uncommenced provision or amendment appears only in the last endnote.

Modifications

If a provision of the republished law is affected by a current modification, the symbol

M

appears immediately before the provision heading. The text of the modifying provision appears in the endnotes. For the legal status of modifications, see Legislation Act 2001, section 95.

Penalties

The value of a penalty unit for an offence against this republished law at the republication date is—
(a) if the person charged is an individual—$100; or
(b) if the person charged is a corporation—$500.

 

Australian Capital Territory
Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act 1890 53 and 54 Vic c 27 (repealed)

Contents Page

1 Name of Act 2
2 Colonial Courts of Admiralty 2
3 Power of colonial legislature as to admiralty jurisdiction 4
5 Local admiralty appeal 4
7 Rules of court 4
8 Droits of Admiralty and of the Crown 5
10 Power to appoint a vice-admiral 5
12 Application of Act to courts under Foreign Jurisdiction Acts 5
13 Rules for procedure in slave trade matters 6
14 Orders in Council 6
15 Definitions for Act 6

Endnotes Page

1 About the endnotes 8
2 Abbreviation key 8
3 Legislation history 9
4 Amendment history 10
5 Earlier republications 11

An Act to amend the law respecting the exercise of admiralty jurisdiction in
Her Majesty’s Dominions and elsewhere out of the United Kingdom

1 Name of Act

This Act is the Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act 1890.

2 Colonial Courts of Admiralty

(1) Every court of law in a British possession, which is for the time being declared under this Act to be a court of Admiralty, or which, if no such declaration is in force in the possession, has in the possession original unlimited civil jurisdiction, shall be a court of Admiralty, with the jurisdiction in this Act mentioned, and may for the purpose of that jurisdiction exercise all the powers that it possesses for the purpose of its other civil jurisdiction.

(2) The court in relation to the jurisdiction conferred by this Act is in this Act referred to as a Colonial Court of Admiralty.

(3) If in a British possession the Governor is the sole judicial authority, the expression court of law in this section includes the Governor.

(4) The jurisdiction of a Colonial Court of Admiralty shall, subject to the provisions of this Act, be over the like places, persons, matters, and things, as the Admiralty jurisdiction of the High Court in England, whether existing because of any statute or otherwise, and the Colonial Court of Admiralty may exercise the jurisdiction in like way and to as full an extent as the High Court in England, and shall have the same regards as that court to international law and the comity of nations.

(5) Subject to the provision of this Act, any enactment referring to a Vice-Admiralty Court, which is contained in an Act of the Imperial Parliament or in a colonial law, shall apply to a Colonial Court of Admiralty, and be read as if the expression ‘Colonial Court of Admiralty’ were in the enactment substituted for ‘Vice-Admiralty Court’ or for other expressions respectively referring to the Vice-Admiralty Courts or the judge of it, and the Colonial Court of Admiralty shall have jurisdiction accordingly.

(6) Provided as follows:

(a) any enactment in an Act of the Imperial Parliament referring to the Admiralty jurisdiction of the High Court in England, when applied to a Colonial Court of Admiralty in a British possession, shall be read as if the name of that possession were in the enactment substituted for England and Wales; and

(b) a Colonial Court of Admiralty shall have under the Naval Prize Act 1864 and under the Slave Trade Act 1873 and any enactment relating to prize or the slave trade, the jurisdiction thereby conferred on a Vice-Admiralty Court and not the jurisdiction thereby conferred exclusively on the High Court of Admiralty or the High Court of Justice; but, unless for the time being duly authorised, shall not under this Act exercise any jurisdiction under the Naval Prize Act 1864 or otherwise in relation to prize; and

(c) a Colonial Court of Admiralty shall not have jurisdiction under this Act to try or punish a person for an offence that according to the law of England is punishable on indictment; and

(d) a Colonial Court of Admiralty shall not have any greater jurisdiction in relation to the laws and regulations relating to Her Majesty’s Navy at sea, or under any Act providing for the discipline of Her Majesty’s Navy, than may be from time to time conferred on the court by order in council.

(7) If a court in a British possession exercises in relation to matters arising outside the body of a county or other like part of a British possession any jurisdiction exerciseable under this Act, that jurisdiction shall be deemed to be exercised under this Act and not otherwise.

3 Power of colonial legislature as to admiralty jurisdiction

(1) The legislature of a British possession may by any colonial law—

(a) declare any court of unlimited civil jurisdiction, whether original or appellate, in that possession to be a Colonial Court of Admiralty, and provide for the exercise by the court of its jurisdiction under this Act, and limit territorially, or otherwise, the extent of the jurisdiction; and

(b) confer on any inferior or subordinate court in that possession such partial or limited Admiralty jurisdiction under such regulations and with such appeal (if any) as may seem appropriate.

(2) However, any such colonial law shall not confer any jurisdiction that is not by this Act conferred on a Colonial Court of Admiralty.

5 Local admiralty appeal

Subject to rules of court under this Act, judgments of a court in a British possession given or made in the exercise of the jurisdiction conferred on it by this Act, shall be subject to the like appeal (if any) as judgments of the court in the exercise of its ordinary civil jurisdiction, and the court having cognisance of the appeal shall for the purpose of the appeal possess all the jurisdiction by this Act conferred on a Colonial Court of Admiralty.

7 Rules of court

(1) Rules of court for regulating the procedure and practice (including fees and costs) in a court in a British possession in the exercise of the jurisdiction conferred by this Act, whether original or appellate, may be made by the same authority and in the same way as rules about the practice, procedure, fees and costs in the court in the exercise of its ordinary civil jurisdiction respectively are made.

(2) The rules may provide for the exercise of any jurisdiction conferred by this Act by the full court, or by any judge or judges of the court, and subject to any rules, if the ordinary civil jurisdiction of the court can in any case be exercised by a single judge, any jurisdiction conferred by this Act may in the like case be exercised by a single judge.

8 Droits of Admiralty and of the Crown

(1) Subject to subsections (2) and (3), nothing in this Act shall alter the application of any droits of Admiralty or droits of or forfeitures to the Crown in a British possession.

(2) It shall be lawful for her Majesty the Queen in Council by order to direct that, subject to any conditions, exceptions, reservations and regulations contained in the order, the said droits and forfeitures condemned by a court in a British possession shall form part of the revenues of that possession either for ever or for the limited term or subject to the revocation as may be specified in the order.

(3) If and so long as any of the droits or forfeitures under this or any other Act form part of the revenues of the possession, they shall, subject to the provisions of any law for the time applying, be notified, accounted for and dealt with in way directed by the Government of the possession.

10 Power to appoint a vice-admiral

(1) Nothing in this Act shall affect any power of appointing a vice-admiral in and for any British possession or any place in it.

(2) Whenever there is not a formally appointed vice-admiral in a British possession or any place in it, the Governor of the possession shall be ex-officio vice-admiral of the possession or place.

12 Application of Act to courts under Foreign Jurisdiction Acts

It shall be lawful for Her Majesty the Queen in Council by order to direct that this Act shall, subject to the conditions, exceptions and qualifications (if any) contained in the order, apply to any court established by Her Majesty for the exercise of jurisdiction in any place out of Her Majesty’s dominions that is named in the order as if that court were a Colonial Court of Admiralty, and to provide for carrying into effect the application.

13 Rules for procedure in slave trade matters

(1) It shall be lawful for Her Majesty the Queen in Council by order to makes rules about the practice and procedure (including fees and costs) to be observed in and the returns to be made from Colonial Courts of Admiralty and Vice-Admiralty Courts in the exercise of their jurisdiction in matters relating to the slave trade.

(2) Except when inconsistent with such order in council, the rules of court for the time being in force in a Colonial Court of Admiralty or Vice-Admiralty Court shall, so far as applicable, extend to proceedings in the court in matters relating to the slave trade.

14 Orders in Council

It shall be lawful for Her Majesty in Council from time to time to make orders for the purposes authorised by this Act, and to revoke and vary the orders, and every such order while in operation shall have effect as if it were part of this Act.

15 Definitions for Act

Note A definition applies except so far as the contrary intention appears (see Legislation Act 2001, s 155).

In this Act:

appeal means any appeal, rehearing or review.

colonial law means any Act, ordinance or other law having the force of legislative enactment in a British possession and made by any authority, other than the Imperial Parliament or Her Majesty in Council, competent to make laws for the possession.

judgment includes a decree, order and sentence.

unlimited civil jurisdiction means civil jurisdiction unlimited as to the value of the subject matter at issue, or as to the amount that may be claimed or recovered.

Endnotes

1 About the endnotes

Amending and modifying laws are annotated in the legislation history and the amendment history. Current modifications are not included in the republished law but are set out in the endnotes.

Not all editorial amendments made under the Legislation Act 2001, part 11.3 are annotated in the amendment history. Full details of any amendments can be obtained from the Parliamentary Counsel’s Office.

Uncommenced amending laws and expiries are listed in the legislation history and the amendment history. These details are underlined.

Uncommenced provisions and amendments are not included in the republished law but are set out in the last endnote.

If all the provisions of the law have been renumbered, a table of renumbered provisions gives details of previous and current numbering.

The endnotes also include a table of earlier republications.

If the republished law includes penalties, current information about penalty unit values appears on the republication inside front cover.

2 Abbreviation key

am = amended
amdt = amendment
ch = chapter
cl = clause
def = definition
dict = dictionary
disallowed = disallowed by the Legislative Assembly
div = division pt = part
exp = expires/expired
Gaz = Gazette
hdg = heading
IA = Interpretation Act 1967
ins = inserted/added
LA = Legislation Act 2001
LR = legislation register
LRA = Legislation (Republication) Act 1996
mod = modified / modification
No = number
num = numbered
o = order
om = omitted/repealed
ord = ordinance
orig = original
p = page
par = paragraph
pres = present
prev = previous
(prev...) = previously
prov = provision
r = rule/subrule
reg = regulation/subregulation
renum = renumbered
reloc = relocated
R[X] = Republication No
RI = reissue
s = section/subsection
sch = schedule
sdiv = subdivision
sub = substituted
SL = Subordinate Law
underlining = whole or part not commenced or to be expired
--------------

 

3 Legislation history

This Act was originally a UK Act—Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act, 1890 53 and 54 Vic c 27 (UK). The Act was renamed as the Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act 1890 when it was first republished under the Legislation Act 2001

The Act was in force in NSW immediately before 1 January 1911 (the date of establishment of the ACT) and was continued in force by the Seat of Government Acceptance Act 1909 (Cwlth), s 6.

Under the Seat of Government (Administration) Act 1910 (Cwlth), s 4 the Act had effect in the ACT as if it were an ACT law (subject to ordinances made under the Seat of Government (Administration) Act 1910).

The Australian Capital Territory (Self-Government) Act 1988 (Cwlth), s 34 (4) converted most former UK laws in force in the ACT into ACT enactments. This allowed the ACT Legislative Assembly to amend and repeal the laws. This Act was converted into an ACT enactment on 11 May 1989 (self-government day).

Under the Interpretation Act 1967 (repealed), s 65 all former UK Acts in force in the ACT immediately before 10 November 1999 (including this Act) became, for all purposes, laws made by the ACT Legislative Assembly. This completed the process of making former UK Acts fully into ACT laws.

Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act 1890 53 and 54 Vic c 27

as amended by

Imperial Acts Application Act 1986 No 93 s 5 and sch 3 pt 27

notified 12 January 1987 (Cwlth Gaz 1986 No S1)
s 5 and sch 3 pt 27 commenced 12 January 1987 (s 2 (1))

as repealed by

Statute Law Amendment Act 2002 (No 2) No 49 pt 4.4

notified LR 20 December 2002
s 1, s 2 taken to have commenced 7 October 1994 (LA s 75 (2))
pt 4.4 commenced 17 January 2003 (s 2 (1))

4 Amendment history

The Imperial Acts Application Act 1986 (the 1986 Act), sch 3, pt 27 set out the text of this Act in an amended form and provided for the amended form to apply as the text of the Act in force in the ACT (see 1986 Act, s 5 (1), (4) and (5)).

Section 4, and the parts of section 7 requiring the approval of the Crown in Council to rules of court made under section 7, were omitted by the 1986 Act. They ceased to have effect in the Commonwealth from 3 September 1939 (Statute of Westminster 1931, s 6).

Section 6 was omitted by the 1986 Act because it was repealed by the Australia Act 1986 (Cwlth), section 11 (2).

This Act came into force in NSW on 1 July 1911 (see Statutory Rules and Orders 1911 No 440 (UK)), that is, after the date of establishment of the ACT (1 January 1911). Therefore, at the time of the enactment of the 1986 Act, the jurisdiction conferred on the ACT Supreme Court by the Supreme Court Act 1933, section 11 (b) (see now section 20 (1) (b)) did not include the jurisdiction conferred by this Act (as in force in NSW) on the Supreme Court of NSW.

Section 8 was amended by the 1986 Act to make it clear that droits of Admiralty, and droits of, or forfeitures to, the Crown, that form part of the revenues of the Commonwealth (now the ACT) are to be dealt with as directed by the Government of the ACT and not by the Treasury of the UK.

Section 9 was omitted by the 1986 Act. It enabled the Admiralty to establish Vice-Admiralty Courts in a British possession.

Section 11 was omitted by the 1986 Act. Subsection (1) dealt with the application of the Act in the Channel Islands. Subsection (2) conferred power on the Queen in Council to declare that the jurisdiction conferred by the Act on a Colonial Court of Admiralty should not vest in a court in a possession that did not have a representative legislature.

Section 13 (1) was amended by the 1986 Act to omit the reference to East Africa Courts. Section 13 (3) was omitted by the 1986 Act because it dealt only with appeals from judgments of East African Courts.

The definition of local appeal was omitted from section 15 by the 1986 Act. The definition was unnecessary as appeals from the ACT Supreme Court are regulated by Commonwealth law.

Section 16 (3) was amended by the 1986 Act to omit provisions relating to India and Vice-Admiralty Courts.

Section 16 and schedule 1 (which related to the commencement of the Act and its application) and section 17 (which was about the abolition of Vice-Admiralty Courts) are clearly spent and were omitted under the Legislation Act 2001.

Section 18 and the second schedule were omitted by the 1986 Act. They repealed certain provisions of certain Imperial Acts.

This Act has not been amended since the enactment of the 1986 Act, except under the Legislation Act 2001.

Name of Act

s 1 hdg ------------------ am R1 LA
s1 ------------------------ am R1 LA

Colonial Courts of Admiralty

s 2 ----------------- ss renum R1 LA

Power of colonial legislature as to admiralty jurisdiction

s 3 ----------------- ss num R1 LA

Rules of court

s 7 ----------------- ss renum R1 LA

Power to appoint a vice-admiral

s 10 ---------------- ss num R1 LA

Definitions for Act

s 15 ----------------------- def representative legislature om R1 LA

Commencement of Act

s 16 ------- om R1 LA

Abolition of Vice-Admiralty Court

s 17 ------- om R1 LA

Schedules

schs hdg ------ om R1 LA
sch 1 ----------- om R1 LA

5 Earlier republications

Some earlier republications were not numbered. The number in column 1 refers to the publication order.

Since 12 September 2001 every authorised republication has been published in electronic pdf format on the ACT legislation register. A selection of authorised republications have also been published in printed format. These republications are marked with an asterisk (*) in column 1. Except for the footer, electronic and printed versions of an authorised republication are identical.

Republication No: 1
Amendments to: Act 1986 No 93
Republication date: 10 July 2002

Unauthorised version prepared by ACT Parliamentary Counsel's Office

© Australian Capital Territory 2003

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: http://web.uct.ac.za/depts/shiplaw/legisltn/1890act.htm

Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act, 1890

(53 & 54 VICT)
[25 July 1890.]

Chapter 27

An Act to amend the Law respecting the exercise of Admiralty Jurisdiction in Her Majesty's Dominions and elsewhere out of the United Kingdom.

BE it enacted by the Queen's most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same. as follows:

1. Short Title

This Act may be cited as the Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act, 1890.

2. Colonial Courts of Admiralty

1. Every court of law in a British possession, which is for the time being declared in pursuance of this Act to be a court of Admiralty, or which, if no such declaration is in force in the possession, has therein original unlimited civil jurisdiction, shall be a court of Admiralty, with the jurisdiction in this Act mentioned, and may for the purpose of that jurisdiction exercise all the powers which it possesses for the purpose of its other civil jurisdiction, and such court in reference to the jurisdiction conferred by this Act is in this Act referred to as a Colonial Court of Admiralty. Where in a British possession the Governor is the sole judicial authority, the expression 'court of law' for the purposes of this section includes such Governor.

2. The jurisdiction of a Colonial Court of Admiralty shall, subject to the provisions of this Act, be over the like places, persons, matters, and things, as the Admiralty jurisdiction of the High Court in England, whether existing by virtue of any statute or otherwise, and the Colonial Court of Admiralty may exercise such jurisdiction in like manner and to as full an extent as the High Court in England, and shall have the same regard as that Court to international law and the comity of nations.

3. Subject to the provisions of this Act any enactment referring to a Vice-Admiralty Court, which is contained in an Act of the Imperial Parliament or in a Colonial law, shall apply to a Colonial Court of Admiralty, and be read as if the expression 'Colonial Court of Admiralty' were therein substituted for 'Vice-Admiralty Court' or for other expressions respectively referring to such Vice-Admiralty Courts or the judges thereof, and the Colonial Court of Admiralty shall have jurisdiction accordingly.

Provided as always:

1. Any enactment in an Act of the Imperial Parliament referring to the Admiralty jurisdiction of the High Court in England, when applied to a Colonial Court of Admiralty in a British possession, shall be read as if the name of that possession were therein substituted for England and Wales; and
2. A Colonial Court of Admiralty shall have under the Naval Prize Act, 1864 and under the Slave Trade Act, 1873, and any enactment relating to prize or the slave trade, the jurisdiction thereby conferred on a Vice-Admiralty Court and not the jurisdiction thereby conferred exclusively on the High Court of Admiralty or the High Court of Justice; but, unless for the time being duly authorised, shall not by virtue of this Act exercise any jurisdiction under the Naval Prize Act, 1864, or otherwise in relation to prize; and
3. A Colonial Court of Admiralty shall not have jurisdiction under this Act to try or punish a person for an offence which according to the law of England is punishable on indictment; and
4. A Colonial Court of Admiralty shall not have any greater jurisdiction in relation to the laws and regulations relating to Her Majesty's Navy at sea, or under any Act providing for the discipline of Her Majesty's Navy, than may be from time to time conferred on such court by Order in Council.

4. Where a Court in a British possession exercises in respect of matters arising outside the body of a county or other like part of a British possession any jurisdiction exercisable under this Act, that jurisdiction shall be deemed to be exercised under this Act and not otherwise.

3. Power of Colonial Legislature as to Admiralty jurisdiction

The legislature of a British possession may by any Colonial law

1. declare any court of unlimited civil jurisdiction, whether original or appellate, in that possession to be a Colonial Court of Admiralty, and provide for the exercise by such court of its jurisdiction under this Act, and limit territorially, or otherwise, the extent of such jurisdiction; and
2. confer upon any inferior or subordinate court in that possession such partial or limited Admiralty jurisdiction under such regulations and with such appeal (if any) as may seem fit:

Provided that any such Colonial law shall not confer any jurisdiction which is not by this Act conferred upon a Colonial Court of Admiralty.

4. Reservation of Colonial Law for Her Majesty's assent

Every Colonial law which is made in pursuance of this Act, or affects the jurisdiction of or practice or procedure in any court of such possession in respect of the jurisdiction conferred by this Act, or alters any such Colonial law as above in this section mentioned, which has been previously passed, shall, unless previously approved by Her Majesty through a Secretary of State, either be reserved for the signification of Her Majesty's pleasure thereon, or contain a suspending clause providing that such law shall not come into operation until Her Majesty's pleasure thereon has been publicly signified in the British possession in which it has been passed.

5. Local Admiralty Appeal

Subject to rules of court under this Act, judgements of a court in a British possession given or made in the exercise of the jurisdiction conferred on it by this Act, shall be subject to the like local appeal, if any, as judgements of the court in the exercise of its ordinary civil jurisdiction, and the court having cognisance of such appeal shall for the purpose thereof possess all the jurisdiction by this Act conferred upon a Colonial Court of Admiralty.

6. Admiralty Appeal to the Queen in Council

1. The appeal from a judgement of any court in a British possession in the exercise of the jurisdiction conferred by this Act, either where there is as of right no local appeal or after a decision on local appeal, lies to Her Majesty the Queen in Council.

2. Save as may be otherwise specially allowed in a particular case by Her Majesty the Queen in Council, an appeal under this section shall not be allowed
1. from any judgement not having the effect of a definitive judgment unless the court appealed from has given leave for such appeal, nor
2. from any judgement unless the petition of appeal has been lodged within the time prescribed by rules, or if no time is prescribed within six months from the date of the judgement appealed against, or if leave to appeal has been given then from the date of such leave.

3. For the purpose of appeals under this Act, Her Majesty the Queen in Council and the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council shall, subject to rules under this section, have all such powers for making and enforcing judgements, whether interlocutory or final, for punishing contempts, for requiring the payment of money into court, or for any other purpose, as may be necessary, or as were possessed by the High Court of Delegates before the passing of the Act transferring the powers of such court to Her Majesty in Council, or as are for the time being possessed by the High Court in England or by the court appealed from in relation to the like matters as those forming the subject of appeals under this Act.

4. All Orders of the Queen in Council or the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council for the purposes aforesaid or otherwise in relation to appeals under this Act shall have full effect throughout Her Majesty's dominions, and in all places where Her Majesty has jurisdiction.

5. This section shall be in addition to and not in derogation of the authority of Her Majesty in Council or the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council arising otherwise than under this Act, and all enactments relating to appeals to Her Majesty in Council or to the powers of Her Majesty in Council or the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in relation to those appeals, whether for making rules and orders or otherwise, shall extend, save as otherwise directed by Her Majesty in Council, to appeals to Her Majesty in Council under this Act.

7. Rules of court

1. Rules of court for regulating the procedure and practice (including fees and costs) in a court in a British possession in the exercise of the jurisdiction conferred by this Act, whether original or appellate, may be made by the same authority and in the same manner as rules touching the practice, procedure, fees, and costs in the said court in the exercise of its ordinary civil jurisdiction respectively are made:

Provided that the rules under this section shall not, save as provided by this Act, extend to matters relating to the slave trade, and shall not (save as provided by this section) come into operation until they have been approved by Her Majesty in Council, but on coming into operation shall have full effect as if enacted in this Act, and any enactment inconsistent therewith shall, so far as it is so inconsistent, be repealed.

2. It shall be lawful for Her Majesty in Council, in approving rules made under this section, to declare that the rules so made with respect to any matters which appear to Her Majesty to be matters of detail or of local concern may be revoked, varied, or added to without the approval required by this section.

3. Such rules may provide for the exercise of any jurisdiction conferred by this Act by the full court, or by any judge or judges thereof, and subject to any rules, where the ordinary civil jurisdiction of the court can in any case be exercised by a single judge, any jurisdiction conferred by this Act may in the like case be exercised by a single judge.

8. Droits of Admiralty and of the Crown

1. Subject to the provisions of this section nothing in this Act shall alter the application of any droits of Admiralty or droits of or forfeitures to the Crown in a British possession; and such droits and forfeitures, when condemned by a court of a British possession in the exercise of the jurisdiction conferred by this Act, shall, save as is otherwise provided by any other Act, be notified, accounted for, and dealt with in such manner as the Treasury from time to time direct, and the officers of every Colonial Court of Admiralty and of every other court in a British possession exercising Admiralty jurisdiction shall obey such directions in respect of the said droits and forfeitures as may be from time to time given by the Treasury.

2. It shall be lawful for Her Majesty the Queen in Council by Order to direct that, subject to any conditions, exceptions, reservations, and regulations contained in the Order, the said droits and forfeitures condemned by a court in a British possession shall form part of the revenues of that possession either for ever or for such limited term or subject to such revocation as may be specified in the Order.

3. If and so long as any of such droits or forfeitures by virtue of this or any other Act form part of the revenues of the said possession the same shall, subject to the provisions of any law for the time being applicable thereto, be notified, accounted for, and dealt with in manner directed by the Government of the possession, and the Treasury shall not have any power in relation thereto.

9. Power to Establish Vice-Admiralty Court

1. It shall be lawful for Her Majesty, by commission under the Great Seal to empower the Admiralty to establish in a British possession any Vice-Admiralty Court or Courts.

2. Upon the establishment of a Vice-Admiralty Court in a British possession, the Admiralty, by writing under their hands and the seal of the office of Admiralty, in such form as the Admiralty direct, may appoint a judge, registrar, marshal, and other officers of the court, and may award any such appointment, and in addition to any other jurisdiction of such court, may (subject to the limits imposed by this Act or the said commission from Her Majesty) vest in such court the whole or any part of the jurisdiction by or by virtue of this Act conferred upon any courts of that British possession, and may vary or revoke such vesting, and while such vesting is in force the power of such last-mentioned courts to exercise the jurisdiction so vested shall be suspended.

Provided that--

1. nothing in this section shall authorise a Vice-Admiralty Court so established in India or in any British possession having a representative legislature, to exercise any jurisdiction, except for some purpose relating to prize, to Her Majesty's Navy, to the slave trade, to the matters dealt with by the Foreign Enlistment Act, 1870 [33 & 34 Vict c 90], or the Pacific Islanders Protection Acts, 1872 L35 & 36 Vict c 19] and 1875, [38 & 39 Vict c 51~, or to matters in which questions arise relating to treaties or conventions with foreign countries, or to international law; and
2. in the event of a vacancy in the office of judge, registrar, marshal, or other officer of any Vice-Admiralty Court in a British possession, the Governor of that possession may appoint a fit person to fill the vacancy until an appointment to the office is made by the Admiralty.

3. The provisions of this Act with respect to appeals to Her Majesty in Council from courts in British possessions in the exercise of the jurisdiction conferred by this Act shall apply to appeals from Vice-Admiralty Courts, but the rules and orders made in relation to appeals from Vice-Admiralty Courts may differ from the rules made in relation to appeals from the said courts in British possessions.

4. If Her Majesty at any time by commission under the Great Seal so directs, the Admiralty shall by writing under their hands and the seal of the office of Admiralty abolish a Vice-Admiralty Court established in any British possession under this section, and upon such abolition the jurisdiction of any Colonial Court of Admiralty in that possession which was previously suspended shall be revived.

10. Power to Appoint a Vice-Admiral

Nothing in this Act shall affect any power of appointing a vice-admiral in and for any British possession or any place therein; and whenever there is not a formally appointed vice-admiral in a British possession or any place therein, the Governor of the possession shall be ex-officio vice-admiral thereof.

11. Exception of Channel Islands and Other Possessions

1. The provisions of this Act with respect to Colonial Courts of Admiralty shall not apply to the Channel Islands.

2. It shall be lawful for the Queen in Council by Order to declare, with respect to any British possession which has not a representative legislature, that the jurisdiction conferred by this Act on Colonial Courts of Admiralty shall not be vested in any court of such possession, or shall be vested only to the partial or limited extent specified in the Order.

12. Application of Act to Courts under Foreign Jurisdiction Acts

It shall be lawful for Her Majesty the Queen in Council by Order to direct that this Act shall, subject to the conditions, exceptions, and qualifications (if any) contained in the Order, apply to any Court established by Her Majesty for the exercise of jurisdiction in any place out of Her Majesty's dominions which is named in the Order as if that Court were a Colonial Court of Admiralty, and to provide for carrying into effect such application.

13. Rules for Procedure in Slave Trade Matters

1. It shall be lawful for Her Majesty the Queen in Council by Order to make rules as to the practice and procedure (including fees and costs) to be observed in and the returns to be made from Colonial Courts of Admiralty and Vice-Admiralty Courts in the exercise of their jurisdiction in matters relating to the slave trade, and in and from East African Courts as defined by the Slave Trade (East African Courts) Acts, 1873 [36 & 37 Vict c 59] and 1879 [42 & 43 Vict c 38].

2. Except when inconsistent with such Order in Council, the rules of court for the time being in force in a Colonial Court of Admiralty or Vice-Admiralty Court shall, so far as applicable, extend to proceedings in such court in matters relating to the slave trade.

3. The provisions of this Act with respect to appeals to Her Majesty in Council, from courts in British possessions in the exercise of the jurisdiction conferred by this Act, shall apply, with the necessary modifications, to appeals from judgements of any East African court made or purporting to be made in exercise of the jurisdiction under the Slave Trade (East African Courts) Acts, 1873 and 1879.

14. Orders in Council

It shall be lawful for Her Majesty in Council from time to time to make Orders for the purposes authorised by this Act, and to revoke and vary such Orders, and every such Order while in operation shall have effect as if it were part of this Act.

15. Interpretation

In the construction of this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,--

The expression 'representative legislature' means, in relation to a British possession, a legislature comprising a legislative body of which at least one half are elected by inhabitants of the British possession .

The expression 'unlimited civil jurisdiction' means civil jurisdiction unlimited as to the value of the subject-matter at issue, or as to the amount that may be claimed or recovered.

The expression 'judgement' includes a decree, order, and sentence.

The expression 'appeal' means any appeal, rehearing, or review; and the expression 'local appeal' means an appeal to any court inferior to Her Majesty in Council.

The expression 'Colonial law' means any Act, ordinance, or other law having the force of legislative enactment in a British possession and made by any authority, other than the Imperial Parliament or Her Majesty in Council, competent to make laws for such possession.

16. Commencement of Act

1. This Act shall, save as otherwise in this Act provided, come into force in every British possession on the first day of July one thousand eight hundred and ninety-one.

Provided that--

1. This Act shall not come into force in any of the British possessions named in the First Schedule to this Act until Her Majesty so directs by Order in Council, and until the day named in that behalf in such Order; and
2. If before any day above mentioned rules of court for the Colonial Court of Admiralty in any British possession have been approved by Her Majesty in Council, this Act may be proclaimed in that possession by the Governor thereof, and on such proclamation shall come into force on the day named in the proclamation.

2. The day upon which this Act comes into force in any British possession shall, as regards that British possession, be deemed to be the commencement of this Act.

3. If, on the commencement of this Act in any British possession, rules of court have not been approved by Her Majesty in pursuance of this Act, the rules in force at such commencement under the Vice-Admiralty Courts Act, 1863 [26 & 27 Vict c 24], and in India the rules in force at such commencement regulating the respective Vice-Admiralty Courts or Courts of Admiralty in India, including any rules made with reference to proceedings instituted on behalf of Her Majesty's ships, shall, so far as applicable, have effect in the Colonial Court or Courts of Admiralty of such possession, and in any Vice-Admiralty Court established under this Act in that possession, as rules of court under this Act, and may be revoked and varied accordingly; and all fees payable under such rules may be taken in such manner as the Colonial Court may direct, so however that the amount of each such fee shall so nearly as practicable be paid to the same officer or person who but for the passing of this Act would have been entitled to receive the same in respect of like business. So far as any such rules are inapplicable or do not extend, the rules of court for the exercise by a court of its ordinary civil jurisdiction shall have effect as rules for the exercise by the same court of the jurisdiction conferred by this Act.

4. At any time after the passing of this Act any Colonial law may be passed, and any Vice-Admiralty Court may be established and jurisdiction vested in such Court, but any such law, establishment, or vesting shall not come into effect until the commencement of this Act.

17. Abolition of Vice-Admiralty Courts

On the commencement of this Act in any British possession, but subject to the provisions of this Act, every Vice-Admiralty Court in that possession shall be abolished; subject as follows,--

1. All judgements of such Vice-Admiralty Court shall be executed and may be appealed from in like manner as if this Act had not passed, and all appeals from any Vice-Admiralty Court pending at the commencement of this Act shall be heard and determined, and the judgement thereon executed as nearly as may be in like manner as if this Act had not passed:

2. All proceedings pending in the Vice-Admiralty Court in any British possession at the commencement of this Act shall, notwithstanding the repeal of any enactment by this Act, be continued in a Colonial Court of Admiralty of the possession in manner directed by rules of court, and, so far as no such rule extends, 'in like manner, as nearly as may be, as if they had been originally begun in such court:

3. Where any person holding an office, whether that of judge, registrar, or marshal, or any other office in any such Vice-Admiralty Court in a British possession, suffers any pecuniary loss in consequence of the abolition of such court, the Government of the British possession, on complaint of such person, shall provide that such person shall receive reasonable compensation (by way of an increase of salary or a capital sum, or otherwise) in respect of his loss, subject nevertheless to the performance, if required by the said Government, of the like duties as before such abolition:

4. All books, papers, documents, office furniture, and other things at the commencement of this Act belonging, or appertaining to any Vice-Admiralty Court, shall be delivered over to the proper office of the Colonial Court of Admiralty or be otherwise dealt with in such manner as, subject to any directions from her Majesty, the Governor may direct:

5. Where, at the commencement of this Act in a British possession, any person holds a commission to act as advocate in any Vice-Admiralty Court abolished by this Act, either for Her Majesty or for the Admiralty, such commission shall be of the same avail in every court of the same British possession exercising jurisdiction under this Act, as if such court were the court mentioned or referred to in such commission.

18. Repeal

The Acts specified in the Second Schedule to this Act shall, to the extent mentioned in the third column of that schedule, be repealed as respects any British possession as from the commencement of this Act in that possession, and as respects any courts out of Her Majesty's dominions as from the date of any Order applying this Act:

Provided that--

1. Any appeal against a judgement made before the commencement of this Act may be brought and any such appeal and any proceedings or appeals pending at the commencement of this Act may be carried on and completed and carried into effect as if such repeal had not been enacted; and
2. All enactments and rules at the passing of this Act in force touching the practice, procedure, fees, costs, and returns in matters relating to the slave trade in Vice-Admiralty courts and in East African courts shall have effect as rules made in pursuance of this Act, and shall apply to Colonial Courts of Admiralty, and may be altered and revoked accordingly.

Schedules

First Schedule

British Possessions In Which Operation Of Act Is Delayed

[The commencement of the Act was delayed in New South Wales, Victoria, St. Helena and British Honduras.]

Second Schedule

Enactments Repealed

[The following Acts are repealed:

7 & 8 Vict c 69, 26 Vict c 24, 30 & 31 Vict c 45, 36 & 37 Vict c 59, 36 & 37 Vict c 88, and 38 & 39 Vict c 51. The 1840, 1861 and 1873 Acts remained in force.]

The 1890 Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act left intact the jurisdiction of the Admiralty Division of the High Court in personam which, from 1873, was empowered (in addition to its special powers in rem) to hear any matter upon which the High Court in its other Divisions may adjudicate, subject only to the power the High Court had to order the transfer of a matter between Divisions. Although the 1890 Act should therefore be read with the following extracts of the 1873 Act, the Cape High Court in The Motoria 1979 (3) SA 616 expressed the view that the 1873 Act did not create any new jurisdiction in Admiralty. Cf. The Caracas Bay 1977 (4) SA 945 (C). For completeness, the relevant extracts of the 1873 Act follow:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Supreme Court of Judicature Act, 1873

[38 & 39 Vict c 66]

Section 16

The High Court of Justice shall be a Superior Court of Record, and, subject as in this Act mentioned, there shall be transferred to and vested in the said High Court of Justice the jurisdiction which, at the commencement of this Act, was vested in, or capable of being exercised by all or any of the Courts following; (that is to say,)

1. The High Court of Chancery, as a Common Law Court as well as a Court of Equity, including the jurisdiction of the Master of the Rolls, as a Judge or Master of the Court of Chancery, and any jurisdiction exercised by him in relation to the Court of Chancery as a Common Law Court;
2. The Court of Queen's Bench;
3. The Court of Common Pleas at Westminster;
4. The Court of Exchequer, as a Court of Revenue, as well as a Common Law Court;
5. The High Court of Admiralty;
6. The Court of Probate;
7. The Court for Divorce and Matrimonial Causes;
8. The London Court of Bankruptcy;
9. The Court of Common Pleas at Lancaster;
10. The Court of Common Pleas at Durham;
11. The Courts created by Commissioners of Assize, of Oyer and Terminer, and of Gaol Delivery, or any of such commissions:

The jurisdiction by this Act transferred to the High Court of Justice shall include (subject to the exceptions hereinafter contained) the jurisdiction which, at the commencement of this Act, was vested in, or capable of being exercised by, all or any one or more of the Judges of the said Courts, respectively, sitting in Court or Chambers, or elsewhere, when acting as Judges or a Judge, in pursuance of any statute, law, or custom, and all powers given by any statute; and also all ministerial powers, duties, and authorities, incident to any and every part of the jurisdictions so transferred.

Section 36

Any cause or matter may at any time, and at any stage thereof, and either with or without application from any of the parties thereto, be transferred by such authority and in such manner as Rules of Court may direct, from one Division or Judge of the High Court of Justice to any other Division or Judge thereof, or may by the like authority be retained in the Division in which the same was commenced, although such may not be the proper Division to which the same cause of matter ought, in the first instance, to have been assigned.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

26th January 2010 6:24 PM

From Debra B

They can't refuse to believe it if they see it in black & white from their own Government.
But then again they close their eyes & go back to sleep.
Oh dear that's too much & too hard to accept, maybe if I pretend it's not there it will go away....

Hmmm LOL

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Support The Love For Life Campaign, Kindom & The Cristian Family

Supporting The Love For Life Website, The Cristian Family and The Living Dream Of Kindom (Creation Of Do No Harm Communities) - The Love for Life website is produced for free without a fee (no contract or conditions attached) as a gift of love for the benefit of others. If you feel you have gained something from visiting it, feel inspired, and would like to reciprocate as an equal exchange in substance and support (value), you are most welcome to make a gift of love to keep it and the dream of Kindom going. As always, we thank you for your gifts of love.

Additional Options

Bank:
Account name:
BSB:
Account number:
SWIFT BIC Code:
Australia New Zealand Banking Group (ANZ)
Fiona Caroline Cristian
012 547
5576 81376
ANZBAU3M

PAY PAL

Go To Your Pay Pal Account To Send Gifts To action @ loveforlife.com.au
Additional Options

 

The Cristian Family November 2006

We Stand For NO SYSTEM

Kindom (Do No Harm Communities) is the dream for freedom, but it is the dream for the freedom of those around us who also live the dream of freedom, because it is in living for the freedom of others that we get our freedom. When we live for the dreams of Kindom of those around us, we live life as a gift because we live for (dedicate our lives to) their dream of freedom, truth, peace, joy, abundance, etc, just as they live for our Kindom dreams too. This is true co-creation (cooperation) with no attack on the uniqueness of each of us. When we live this way, we have no need for any man-made system - everything/everyone has already been taken care of by our love for life.

Just as we do not have to jump 10 feet across the room to grab our next breath, neither do we have to worry about food, water and shelter because it has all been taken care of as we each co-create Kindoms/Kin-Domains for everyone. Now everybody and everything of the dream of life that is Kindom/Paradise is free (has been set free once again). The issue is greed and selfishness, power and control trips, arrogance, ignorance, being fed many many lies and being traumatised. The issue is not overpopulation - there is more than enough land available for every family to have a hectare (2.5 acres Kin-Domain) to care for. The land of Australia can provide a Kin-Domain for every family across Earth, each with a food forest, clean fresh drinking water and plenty of space for building natural do no harm habitats and with plenty of land left over.

Everyone must have the freedom to take full-responsibility for their lives, for the water they drink, the food they eat and for their shelter. Currently, "The System" forces everyone to give up taking full-responsibility so that we become grown up children accustomed to sucking on the nipples of "The System" corporations for everything, having to use money to get by and to follow the rules of money because we are not co-creating freedom, peace, truth, joy and abundance for each other. Money only leads to haves and have nots and all the abuse, manipulation and distractions that we are subjected to as slaves to money.

When we give up living for other's Kindom dreams, we start creating hell ("The System") all around us because we become self-centred - now it's all about "my freedom","my money", "my land", "my belief", "my saviour", "mine", "mine","mine", "i","i", "i", "own", "own", "own", etc. To protect what we claim we own requires a man-made system with FORCE to protect those self-centred claims. This is ALL trauma based and all story-telling (brainwashing/braindirtying).

NO SYSTEM = KINDOM/DO NO HARM COMMUNITIES
NO SYSTEM = KINDOM/DO NO HARM COMMUNITIES photo Kindom_zpsa6d24e8a.jpg

Our true freedom comes when we set our thoughts of freedom into motion so that we live freedom rather than just talking and thinking about it while we still slave for "The System". Kindom will not happen while we meditate for hours in the bush or do yoga retreats or wait for Jesus or follow the processes of the OPPT (One People's Public Trust now called One People). This is not freedom because we are not living freedom because we are living the story-telling of Jesus or Zeitgeist or The Secret or Thrive or One Earth/Consciousness/People.

Living Kindom is very, very hard work as we set about repairing the damage to MAN/Earth/Nature that we are ALL responsible for but the burden becomes lighter the more of us put our life-energy into the dream of returning Earth to Paradise. Day-after-day, we all have to work our arses off until Kindom is all around us (MAN) once again. This is the price we pay to set each other free on a piece of land (Kin-Domain), so that no one is under the image-power (education/brainwashing/story-telling) of another MAN anymore and so that everyone can have their space of love to create and live their unique, do no harm dreams. This only happens once we have the Kindoms set up so that everyone is provided for.

Once we re-create the food forests, whether on land or in the suburbs, we can re-claim our freedom, breaking the strangle-hold of "The System" because we are no longer reliant on its services and benefits and no longer turning each other into slaves of "The System", cogs in the wheels of "The System" machine. If we don't put the effort in to set everyone and everything free all around us then we still live in HELL ("The System"). The key is to live for everyone else's freedom so that we can have it too.

From Bare Dirt To Abundance
A Year In The Life Of The
Love For Life Food Forest

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
8th February 2013
51 Minutes 46 Seconds
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1sJCcCvZ97A

From Bare Dirt To Abundance Part Two A
5th November 2014
http://youtu.be/TPTPn8tgcPI
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8545

From Bare Dirt To Abundance Part Two B
Coming Shortly

We live for NO SYSTEM. We do not lose anything by not having a man-made system and, in fact, we gain. We gain our freedom and we gain abundance. Let go of the fear.

The Cristian Family November 2006

A Collection Of Various Love For Life Posts
Providing The Big Picture We See

Sequential Order

We ask you to NOT believe anything we say/share and instead use scrutiny like an intense blow torch and go where the logic of truth/sense takes you. This is very, very important. Put everything you believe up to the test of scrutiny to see how it stacks up. If you are true to your heart/senses and go where the logic of truth/sense takes you will find that NO belief, etc, will stand up to the test of scrutiny. They just do not stack up because they are lies/fraud.

After you have watched and read all the material and any questions are left unanswered, send us your landline number and we will use the internet phone as a free unlimited call. We are on Sydney NSW Australia time. Best times for us to chat are between 11.00am and 6.00pm.

It is critical that you fully comprehend Image Power, "Spelling", Trauma, Reaction To Trauma, Curses, Processing Curses, Full-Responsibility/Liability, Limited Liability/Responsibility (passing-the-back), Slavery, Senses/Sense vs Non-Sense/Senses, Re-Presenting Intellectual Property such as but not limited to "Name", Storytelling/Storytellers, Duality, Black-Magic, Belief, Lies, "i", All Seeing "i" (eye), etc..... These themes and others are covered over and over and over again.

If you do not comprehend these insights and are unable to use your senses to sense your way through all the non-sense/non-sensory-images that enslave MAN under their image power (darkness = "The System" = Hell), men and women will remain deeply trapped under a terrible state of trauma. Our intention is to inspire you to remedy by showing you how to move away from reacting to trauma in all its nefarious and devious forms.

IMAGE POWER
Superb Diamond Range Interviewing
Arthur & Fiona Cristian 4th February 2014
http://youtu.be/qFnuuw3kLog
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8501

His-Story/Her-Story (History)
Arthur Cristian - Love For Life
2005-2007 - Re-posted July 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8529

The Dream Of Life Part 6
Under The Spell Of Intellectual Property

Arthur Cristian - 51 Minutes 52 Seconds
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IMK7CkU1ih8

Trauma Induced Fantasy
July 2013 Interview With
Jeanice Barcelo And Arthur & Fiona Cristian
http://youtu.be/CZVj-ddUoZw
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8500

The Dark Side Of The Moon
The Background To "The System"

Arthur & Fiona Cristian Interviewed By
Jahnick Leaunier, The Tru-Mon Show
24th August 2016
Love For Life - 142 Minutes
https://youtu.be/C5TViw1NLr4

Eric Dubay's Flat Earth Is A Cult
The Background To The System Part Two

Arthur & Fiona Cristian Chatting With
Jahnick Leaunier On The Tru-Mon Show
Love For Life - 31st August 2016
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8585
154 Minutes
https://youtu.be/rCPWgEQg-2M

Eclipse Of The Sun - Video (Arthur swears in this video)
The Background To The System Part Three
Arthur & Fiona Cristian Chatting With
Jahnick Leaunier On The Tru-Mon Show
Love For Life - 25th October 2016
https://youtu.be/FMOsOi1kNRc

The "Name" Is The Mark Of The Beast
The Strawman Identifying
Your Slave Status In "The System"

By Arthur Cristian - Love For Life
5th February 2012 - 56 Minutes 25 Seconds
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DdOag66v7uo

The Satanic Craft Of Inculcation In Practice
Fiona's ACT Supreme Court Affidavit Explaining Inculcation & Illumination
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
4th March 2016
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8578

The Spinning Top
Full Bloom Inculcation

Arthur And Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
Facebook Discussions Between The
8th December 2016
And
26th January 2017
Link: http://loveforlife.com.au/content/16/03/04/satanic-craft-inculcation-pra...

The Shit Of Death
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
28th January 2017
Link: http://loveforlife.com.au/content/16/03/04/satanic-craft-inculcation-pra...

The Selfie Of Freakenstein
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
17th March 2017
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8588

Three Sets Of Fiona Cristian Documents Filed With ACAT
Merged Into One Document For Downloading
https://www.scribd.com/document/327370355/Fiona-Cristian-Affidavit-ACT-S...

Fiona Cristian Affidavit
ACT Supreme Court / Court Of Appeal

https://www.scribd.com/doc/316218306/Three-Sets-of-Fiona-Cristian-Docume...

Dancing With Magic (Lies)
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Videos, Articles, Comments
And Pending E-Book
Love Fort Life
September 2015
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8575

Dancing With Magic Part One
Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life
5th September 2015
https://youtu.be/hx7qJ7r2OS4

Dancing With Magic Part Two
Arthur Cristian - Love For Life
12th September 2015
https://youtu.be/b_KuEFdKmnA

Dancing With Magic Part Three
Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life
13th September 2015
https://youtu.be/9pJc1NfnAcI

Dancing With Magic (Lies) Part Four:
Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life
16th September 2015
https://youtu.be/kSVURGwm1Go

Introduction To Kindom Video
By Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life
6th March 2015
https://youtu.be/7SspPm9wRgo

To Be Educated Is To Have No Soul
The System Is Soul Destroying

Frederick Malouf & Michael Tellinger's
Contrived Gifting
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
1st September 2016
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8586

Illumination IS Definition
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
26th to 29th January 2016
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8577

IMAGE POWER
The Nefarious Tactics Used
To Disguise Truth And Distract Us
From Remedy

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
24th January 2014
This post contains many recent Facebook comments
and email replies which collectively provides a big picture
into exposing the deception behind IMAGE POWER.
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8496

The Pull Of E-Motion
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
8th February 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8499

Processing Curses
A Lie Is A Curse
Liars Process Curses

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
26th February 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8503

How The System Is Really Constructed
Bouncing Back Curses Upon Curse Makers
To Stop Harm Forevermore

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
27th February 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8504

Slave To A Name
Parts One, Two, Three, Four,
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
3rd to 6th March 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8505

Educated Slaves
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
20th March 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8506

The Only Path To Freedom
Beware The False Steps

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 2nd April 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8508

Free-Dumb For All
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 5th April 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8510

Revoking The Ego
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 8th April 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8511

How MAN Commits Spiritual Suicide
Arthur Cristian
Love For Life - 3rd April 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8509

How To Detect Intel Operatives Working
For The New World Order Agenda
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 10th April 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8512

How The Psyop Program & Intel Networks
Are Messing With Your Head +
His-Story/Her-Story

Arthur & Fiona Cristian - April 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8513

Godzilla Through The Looking Glass
Destroyed By Name"

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 20th April 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8514

What It's Going To Take
To Co-Create Freedom Forevermore

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 22nd April 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8514

Falling For Fairy Stories
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 24th April 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8514

A Disassociation From The Work
Of Kate of Gaia

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 17th May 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8517

Separating The Wheat From The Chaff
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 22nd May 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8516

Revolution Or Revolution
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 25th May 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8520

Routing Out Psyop Programs
Routs Out Intel Operatives
Exposing Max Igan's Psyop Program

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 31st May 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8524

The Psyop Program Scam
Behind Religion Belief Faith
& Associated Opinion

Arthur Cristian
Love For Life
11th June 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8525

Another Delusion
Arthur Cristian
Love For Life
11th June 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8526

A World Of Words Is A World Of Lies
Arthur Cristian
Love For Life
13th June 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8527

E-MAN
The Name Of The Beast Is MAN

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 9th May 2014
Includes Mountain MAN Arrested
Facebook Discussion About "Name"
Uploaded 25th June 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8528

E-Motion
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 13th August 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8537

Discussion With Brother Gregory
Clearly Demonstrating Christianity
Is Part Of The Problem
And Not The Solution

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
Between the 12th May 2014 and 30th August 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8542

The Psyop Program Behind Free Food
And Permaculture

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
29th October 2014
Facebook Discussion With Unconditional Love Moon
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8544

Head So Strong
Music and Vocals Arthur Cristian
Backing Vocals and Vocal Effects Arthur Cristian & Hannah Wood
Lyrics Fiona and Arthur Cristian
Written during our spare time between Aug & Oct 2014
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OG4UQCTsqwU

The Time Of Trauma That Destroys Us
Arthur Cristian - Love For Life
9th November 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8547

The Most Powerful Video On Spirituality
And Happiness FOR SLAVES
Or
How To Accept Slavery And Be Happy About It

Arthur Cristian - Love For Life
6th August 2014
Facebook Discussion About The Work Of Eckhart Tolle
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8548

What Can We Do What Can We See
Arthur Cristian - Love For Life
A series of Arthur Cristian Facebook
posts and discussions
between 17th and 21st November 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8552

The Misuse Of Love By Intel Networks
To Create Doubt And Uncertainty
With The Intention To Destroy Love
And Therefore Destroy MAN
(True Freedom, Peace, Joy, Abundance And Truth
For Everyone)

By Arthur Cristian - Love For Life
26th November 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8554

The Void Of E-GO That Is Spiritual Suicide
The Justification Of Laziness
That Perpetuates System Creature Comforts
Ensuring Our Fall

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
13th December 2014
Massive Update Occurred 14th Dec 2014 3.10pm Sydney Aust time
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8556

Darkness Visible Part One A, B, C, D
The Freemasonic World In Plain Sight
Decoding George Washington Lithographs

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
14th December 2014
Part One A http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8557
Part One B http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8567
Part One C http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8568
Part One D http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8569

Darkness Visible Part Two
Yin And Yang, Duality, Spiritual Suicide
And Frank O'Collins UCADIA / One Heaven

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
14th December 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8558

Darkness Visible Part Three
How The Word Sausage
Re-Presents The New World Order
Boiling Point & Out To Get Us

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
27th December 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8560

Darkness Visible Part Four
Aleister Crowley - Thelema - OTO
And The Black Magic Psychedelia Of The Intellect

Facebook Discussion
4th to 10th January 2015
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8561

Darkness Visible Part Five
Living MAN Fiona Cristian's Standing
+ Decoding Judeo/Judaism

Fiona Cristian & Arthur Cristian
Love For Life
24th January 2015
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8562

Darkness Visible Part Six
The Many Fingers Of The Hidden Hand Appearing
YouTube Community Flagged A Video
Posted To The ArthurLoveForLife YouTube Channel
As Being "Hate Speech"

Fiona Cristian & Arthur Cristian
Love For Life
4th February 2015
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8563

Darkness Visible Part Seven
The Full Responsibility For Setting
True Freedom For All Into Motion
In Present-Sense Forevermore

Fiona Cristian & Arthur Cristian
Love For Life
10th February 2015
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8564

Who We Really Are Does Not End
At The Surface Of Our Skin

Arthur Cristian & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 22nd February 2015
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8565

Introduction To Kindom Video
By Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life
6th March 2015
https://youtu.be/7SspPm9wRgo

The Rot Parts One, Two, Three
Arthur Cristian
Love For Life
5th June 2015
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8571

"The Good Guys" And The "Bad Guys"
Working Together To Bring In
The New World Order

Arthur Cristian - 18th July 2015
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8572

Can You Spot The Ego?
Where's Wally? Part One

Compilation of Facebook & Youtube
Insight Posts During Aug/Sept 2015
By Arthur Cristian
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8573

Can You Spot The Ego?
Where's Wally? Part Two

Compilation of Facebook & Youtube
Insight Posts During Aug/Sept 2015
By Arthur Cristian
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8576

Dancing With Magic (Lies)
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Videos, Articles, Comments
And Pending E-Book
Love Fort Life
September 2015
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8575

Dancing With Magic Part One
Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life
5th September 2015
https://youtu.be/hx7qJ7r2OS4

Dancing With Magic Part Two
Arthur Cristian - Love For Life
12th September 2015
https://youtu.be/b_KuEFdKmnA

Dancing With Magic Part Three
Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life
13th September 2015
https://youtu.be/9pJc1NfnAcI

Dancing With Magic (Lies) Part Four:
Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life
16th September 2015
https://youtu.be/kSVURGwm1Go

Illumination IS Definition
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
26th to 29th January 2016
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8577

The Satanic Craft Of Inculcation In Practice
Fiona's ACT Supreme Court Affidavit Explaining Inculcation & Illumination
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
4th March 2016
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8578

The Dark Side Of The Moon
The Background To "The System" Part One

Arthur & Fiona Cristian Chatting With
Jahnick Leaunier On The Tru-Mon Show
Love For Life - 24th August 2016
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8583

Eric Dubay's Flat Earth Is A Cult
The Background To The System Part Two

Arthur & Fiona Cristian Chatting With
Jahnick Leaunier On The Tru-Mon Show
Love For Life - 31st August 2016
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8585

To Be Educated Is To Have No Soul
The System Is Soul Destroying
Frederick Malouf & Michael Tellinger's
Contrived Gifting

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
1st September 2016
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8586

New Love For Life Kindom Facebook Group
Started March 2015
https://www.facebook.com/groups/1434747556816918
Includes 63 Minute
Introduction To Kindom Video
https://youtu.be/7SspPm9wRgo
By Arthur & Fiona Cristian
and
Facebook Kindom Group Guidelines
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8566
The Love For Life website home-page provides
the bigger-picture background to the themes
touched on in this video: http://loveforlife.com.au

Crop Circles Are A Massive Hoax
Facebook Discussion On Simon Kawai's Wall
Involving Arthur & Fiona Cristian
31st August 2013
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8470

OPPT & Slavery Through Intellectual Conscription By Deceit
Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life
27th February 2013 onwards...
Part One: http://youtu.be/Qjp_9nlrBao
Part Two: http://youtu.be/tbybeOWZ-Bc
Part Three: http://youtu.be/yOWoxH-HbVw

Water Is The Life Of MANS Consciousness (Breath)
Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life - 8th February 2013
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8350
Part One: http://youtu.be/4ze66_33wxM - 70 Minutes 5 Seconds
Part Two: http://youtu.be/43gIi-sjxJc - 81 Minutes 13 Seconds
Part Three: http://youtu.be/oooY6W63K-M - 70 Minutes 18 Seconds

What Do You Believe On Origins?
Who Said There Was A Beginning?
Who's Truth Do You Accept?
Belief Is A Strange Idea.

Discussion Lyndell, Scott and Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Between March and April 2013
Posted 29th October 2013
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8487

So You Want The Good Bits Of "The System"
But Not The Bad Bits?

By Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 12th August 2013
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8468

Turning Away From The Reflection
Of MANS Looking Glass

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
30th April 2013
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8404

REMEDY

From Bare Dirt To Abundance
A Year In The Life Of The
Love For Life Food Forest

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
8th February 2013
51 Minutes 46 Seconds
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1sJCcCvZ97A

From Bare Dirt To Abundance Part Two
5th November 2014
http://youtu.be/TPTPn8tgcPI
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8545

From Bare Dirt To Abundance Part Three
7th March 2016
60 Minutes
https://youtu.be/SH9i8ZStzWI

Love For Life Food Forest & Native Garden March 2016
Extension Of The Love For Life Food Forest And Establishment
Of A New Native Garden At The Front Of The Rental Property
In East Bowral - 24th October 2015 to Mid February 2016.
15 Minutes
https://youtu.be/y-Uz8HmnSIM

Control The Land
And You Control MAN On The Land
Displace MAN From Land
And You Turn MAN Into Slaves

Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life
April 2011 (Updated 14th September 2011)
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8237

The Divine Spark
Facebook Discussion With Raymond Karczewski
Arthur & Fiona Cristian & Others
2nd October 2013
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8483

Capturing Another MANS Uniqueness
A Facebook Debate With
Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life
And Raymond Karczewski
Starting 13th May 2013
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8414

The Spell Is Broken
Taking The Land To Create Kindom

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
3rd March 2013
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8365

The Steps Of Kindom
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life 2006/2007
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8304

To explore these themes in greater detail go here where you can find links to all our Love For Life comments, articles, debates, discussions, videos, podcasts, etc: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/3385

All the best
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life

Website: http://loveforlife.com.au
Email : action@loveforlife.com.au
Mobile : 0011 61 418 203204 - (0418 203204)
Snail Mail: PO Box 1320 Bowral 2576 NSW Australia
Facebook Arthur Cristian : http://www.facebook.com/arthurcristian
YouTube Arthur Cristian : http://www.youtube.com/ArthurLoveForLife

Register To The Love For Life Mailing List: http://loveforlife.com.au/content/09/05/14/mailing-list

Facebook Group Why Aren't We Free Discussion : http://www.facebook.com/164918753537287
Facebook Group Kindom/Do No Harm Community Discussion : http://www.facebook.com/151811728195925

Links below will kick in when the professionally recorded Love For Life music is released.

SoundCloud : http://soundcloud.com/loveforlife
Nimbit Music : http://www.nimbitmusic.com/loveforlife
Twitter : https://twitter.com/loveforlifemusi
Facebook Music : http://www.facebook.com/loveforlifemusic
YouTube Love For Life Music : http://www.myspace.com/loveforlifemusic
MySpace : http://www.myspace.com/loveforlifemusic
Google + Fiona Cristian : https://plus.google.com/100490175160871610090

Peaceful Transition Through Sacrifice And Service

We feel there is an essential peaceful do no harm transition required to get all of MAN back to standing on MANS feet without reliance upon another MAN for water, food, shelter. As it stands everyone in "The System" are highly dependent and reliant on the "group mind-set" that forms "The System" of slaves providing services and benefits for the emotionally addicted slaves to "The System" (and you can put us in the same basket too). The transition is to get MAN back to relying ONLY on nature without 3rd party interlopers, intermeddlers, interceders getting in the way. The transition is a team effort with the foresight for setting all of MAN free down-the-line so that MAN is no longer dependent on slaves and masters providing services, benefits, privileges and exclusivity while being bound to contracts, rituals, procedures, conditions, rules & regulations which compromises MAN severely.

This transition is all about shifting from limited liability/responsibility to full liability/responsibility. This full responsibility is all about caring for our health, nature all around us, clean uncorrupted (pure) water and food, partner/co-creator, children, shelter, animal-friends in partnership, etc. In "The System", we are already together destroying each other - we have to come together to create peace together so that we can all have peace. We cannot live peacefully when we are islands, not taking full responsibility for the lives of those around us until EVERYONE can take full responsibility for their life, which means that EVERYONE is healed of system trauma. In "The System", we all come together to make slaves of each other - now is the moment to come together to set each other free, to live for each other's freedom, peace, joy and abundance. Once we have set each other free, we are free.

Control The Land
And You Control MAN On The Land
Displace MAN From Land
And You Turn MAN Into Slaves

Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life
April 2011 (Updated 14th September 2011)
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8237

The Spell Is Broken
Taking The Land To Create Kindom

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
3rd March 2013
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8365

"The Steps Of Kindom"
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8304

---------

Once we fix these issues, we or our children or our descendants to come, can start focusing on the even bigger picture of getting back to where our ancestors were, as breatharyan's, before they fell into non-sense images to be enslaved by them.

All the best to you and your family
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life

The Cristian Family November 2006

The Cristian Family Declaration

The Cristian family and The Love for Life Campaign are apolitical, non-religious, non-violent, anti weapons, anti drugs (both pharmaceutical and recreational) and anti any ideology that denies the existence of Do No Harm Communities (Kindoms) and suppresses the uniqueness and freedom of all men, women and children.

The Cristian family and our Love For Life work is unaligned to any big business corporation, intelligence agency, government body, "system" law, "system" think tanks, "system" green or environmental movements, religion, cult, sect, society (fraternity, brotherhood, sisterhood, order, club, etc,) secret or not, hidden agenda, law or sovereignty group, occult, esoteric, New Age or Old Age.

The Cristian family supports and promotes the remedy that brings an everlasting peace, freedom, truth, joy, abundance and do no harm for all of life without causing loss of uniqueness or the need for having slaves and rulers. We are not into following the one in front or being shepherds for sheeple. Most importantly, we take full-responsibility for everything we think, feel and do.

The Cristian family are not Christians.

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life

December 2006

The Cristian Family November 2006

THE CRISTIAN FAMILY PLEDGE

Being of clear brain, heart and intention, we each declare the following to be true:

• We have no intention of ending our own lives.

• We will not tolerate suppression of truth, ideas, freedom, or our work. We stand for freedom of speech.

• We stand together to support others in the expression of truths and freedom to speak out no matter how radical those ideas may seem.

• Standing for freedom takes courage; together we shall be strong in the face of all odds.

• If it is ever claimed that we have committed suicide, encountered an unfortunate accident, died of sickness/disease, disappeared, been institutionalized, or sold out financially or in any other way to self-interested factions, we declare those claims false and fabricated.

• We testify, assert and affirm without reservation, on behalf of all those who have dedicated their lives to the ending of secrecy and the promotion of freedom of thought, ideas and expression that we shall prevail.

• We Do Not Have Multiple Personality Disorders

Arthur Cristian
Fiona Cristian
Jasmin Lily Cristian
Emma Rose Cristian
Frances Hannah Cristian
Xanthe Jane Cristian

15th December 2006 (Edited/Updated 18th September 2011)

The Cristian Family November 2006

Update Regarding The Love For Life
Home Page And Quick User Guide

We are turning the Love for Life Quick User Guide http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6608 into a blog of all the main insights of our work since March 2005, whether through articles, videos, podcasts or discussions/debates.

As we do not have the time to compile everything we have written into a book, as many have suggested we do, compiling all our most important work into one area of the website is a way of providing easy access to this work so those interested are able to fully comprehend the big picture.

Instead of having to find our different articles, videos, etc, in various parts of the website, it will all be accessible here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6608 and here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/3385.

Love For Life Videos

As amateurs and posted in the Quick User Guide below the Facebook links, we're currently creating and posting a series of videos called "The Dream Of Life" which covers the ground of all the Love For Life insights. We plan to have the videos completed by December 31st 2012. Once this is behind us, our intention is to create a 2 hour or so video covering the body of this work. All videos are embedded in the quick user guide http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6608 and uploaded in Arthur's YouTube channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/ArthurLoveForLife.

Love For Life Music

We have started recording songs, with others, that express the themes of Love For Life. They are now being posted on Arthur's YouTube channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/ArthurLoveForLife and are embedded in the quick user guide http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6608. We have over 100 songs to record. A few rough demos have already been used as the soundtrack on the first "Dream of Life" video.

About Us - Love For Life & The Cristian Family

Also, everything we, the Cristian family, have gone through, from bank fraud and the theft of the family home to death threats and attempts on Arthur's life, is documented in the Quick User Guide too. If you, the reader, are prepared to put the effort in, you will comprehend the extent to which we have all been tricked into becoming slaves, giving up our uniqueness and our full-responsibility for life and destroying everything of life to the point where life is in danger of dying out completely. You will also comprehend the remedy to all this chaos; a remedy that requires only love for life and the determination to do what needs to be done. Though our focus is very strongly on the remedy that creates a world of freedom, truth, peace, joy, abundance and Do No Harm for all of life without loss of uniqueness or the need for slaves and rulers, we realise that it is vital to comprehend how to get there and what stops us from getting there. This is why there is so much information on the hows and whys of everything going wrong in the world today. We are not into peddling conspiracy theories, we are into routing out all forms of organised crime.

Saturday 26th November 2011

Arthur and Fiona Cristian
Love For Life

Website: http://loveforlife.com.au
Email: action@loveforlife.com.au
Mobile: 0011 61 418 203204 - (0418 203204)
Facebook Arthur Cristian: http://www.facebook.com/arthurcristian
YouTube Arthur Cristian: http://www.youtube.com/ArthurLoveForLife
SoundCloud: http://soundcloud.com/loveforlife
Nimbit Music: http://www.nimbitmusic.com/loveforlife
Twitter: https://twitter.com/loveforlifemusi
Facebook Music: http://www.facebook.com/loveforlifemusic
Facebook Why Aren't We Free Discussion: http://www.facebook.com/164918753537287
Facebook Do No Harm Community: http://www.facebook.com/151811728195925
YouTube Love For Life Music: http://www.myspace.com/loveforlifemusic
MySpace: http://www.myspace.com/loveforlifemusic
Google + Fiona Cristian: https://plus.google.com/100490175160871610090
Register To The Love For Life Mailing List: http://loveforlife.com.au/content/09/05/14/mailing-list

1. For The Body Of The Love For Life Work by Arthur and Fiona Cristian

Which Unravels The Reasons For The Chaos, Mayhem and Confusion Being Experienced In The World Today, Explains The Need For "Community Immunity" and Responsibility, and Focuses On The Creation Of Kindoms - Do No Harm, Life-Sustainable Communities (As The Remedy That Heals All Mans Woes) - And How We Can Co-Create Them. For Comments, Articles And Discussions, Go Here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/3385 - Also Go Here To See Podcasts And Videos Posted by Arthur & Fiona Cristian: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/7309 - The Information Shared Comes From Inspiration, Intuition, Heartfelt-Logic And Information Gathered From Nature And Many Amazing Men And Women Along The Way. It Is Not Found In Any Books Or Channellings, Or Talked About By "Experts". Go Here To Read A Brief Synopsis Of Why We Started Love For Life: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8182

2. For Information About The Ringing Cedars of Russia Series

go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/1125 and for more on Eco Homes, Villages, Organic and Permaculture Gardening and Life-Sustainability, etc, go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/3641 and here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/1985 and Mikhail Petrovich Shchetinin - Kin's School - Lycee School at Tekos: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/5173

3. For How To Eat A Raw, Living Food Diet,

go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/5068 - LIFE is information. When we distort LIFE and then eat, drink, absorb, think, feel, hear, see, touch, taste, smell and perform these distortions, the information of LIFE, your LIFE, our LIFE, our children's lives, everyone's LIFE, is distorted.

4. To Find A Menu For The Extensive Research Library (over 8,000 items posted embodying over 11,000 documents, pdf's, videos, podcasts, etc)

Which Covers Topics From Health to Chemtrails/Haarp to Brain Control to Archaeology to Astronomy Geocentricity Heliocentricity to Pandemics Bird Flu Swine Flu to Fluoride to Cancer to Free Energy to Global Warming, 9/11, Bali Bombings, Aspartame, MSG, Vaccinations, Aids/HIV, Mercury, New World Order, Satanism, Religions, Cults, Sects, Symbolism, etc, etc, go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/82

5. If You Would Like To Read About The Cristian Family NSW Supreme Court Case

(Macquarie Bank/Perpetual Limited Bank Fraud Condoned By Judges, Registrars, Barristers, Lawyers, Politicians, Public Servants, Bureaucrats, Big Business and Media Representatives - A Crime Syndicate/Terrorist Organisation) Which Prompted The Creation Of This Love For Life Website December 2006, And The Shooting And Torture Of Supporters Who Assisted Us In Reclaiming The Family Home, Joe Bryant And His Wife, Both In Their Late 70's, go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/5 And Read Some Of Our Email Correspondence With Lawyer Paul Kean - Macedone Christie Willis Solari Partners - Miranda Sydney May 17th-June 27th 2006: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/7300

6. For The Stories Of Other Victims Of The System,

go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/australian_stories (If you have a story you would like us to put up, we would love to here from you:
action @ loveforlife.com.au)

7. For Documentation Of Harm Done By The Powers-That-Be And Their Representatives,

Evidence Revealing How Victims Did Not Break The Peace, Caused No Crime or Harm, There Were No Injured Parties. Documenting Incontrovertible Evidence Demonstrating How The Powers That Be (PTB) And Their Lackeys Will Break All The Laws They Are Supposed To Uphold. They Will Kidnap, Intimidate, Terrorise, Rape, Pillage, Plunder And Lie And Take Responsibility For None Of It. All Part Of Their Tactics Of Using Fear And Trauma To Keep Us In Our Place. Relatives Of Those Under Their Radar Are Also Not Safe From Attack And Intimidation. All Starting From A $25 Fine For Not Voting And A $65 Fine For Not Changing A Dog Registration. We Do Not Have Freedom And Can Only Appear To Have Freedom If We Comply. Regardless How Small The Matter The PTB Throw Hundreds Of Thousands Of Dollars Away To Enforce Their Will.... Go Here:
Fiona Cristian Reply To State Debt Recovery Office - Part One to Part Ten - From 17th October 2008 And Still Continuing:
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6319 or
Fiona Cristian Reply To State Debt Recovery Office
Part One: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/5742 - From 17th October 2008
Part Two: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6135 - From 18th December 2008
Part Three: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6295 - From 9th January 2009
Part Four: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6296 - From 14th January 2009
Part Five: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6375 - The Sick Puppy - From 20th February 2009
Part Six: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6390 - Police Officers, Sheriff’s Officers, Tow Truck Driver and State Debt Recovery Office Blatantly Ignore the Law To Rape, Pillage and Plunder The Private Property Of Fiona Cristian - From 11th March 2009
Part Seven: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6445 - Affidavit Of Truth - Letter To The Queen + Australia: Fascism is Corporatism - From 30th March 2009
Part Eight: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6652 - The Pirates Auction And The Ghost Of VSL386 - From 4th April 2009
Part Nine: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/7073 - Arthur Cristian's Letter To Pru Goward MP - From 15th December 2009
Part Ten: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/7500 - Should We Be In Fear Of Those Who Claim To Protect Us? "Roman Cult" Canon Law - Ecclesiastical Deed Poll - The Work Of Frank O'Collins - From 13th October 2010

8. If You Are Interested In Information On Freedom From Statutes, Rule-Of-Law, Free Man/Free Woman, Strawman, "Person" and Admiralty Law (The Law Of Commerce),

go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/895 - For Common Law, Democracy, Constitution, Trial By Jury, Fee Simple, etc, go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/category/main/law-articles-documents

9. If You Are Interested In Banking and Money Created (Fiat/Credit/Debt/Mortgage/Loan/Overdraft etc) Out-Of-Thin-Air, How Banks Counterfeit Money,

go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/banks

10. For A List Of All The Latest Posts In The Love For Life Website,

go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/tracker

11. For Links To Many Hundreds Of Videos, DVDs And Podcasts

go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/video_dvd

12. To See The Cristian Family Pledge, Legal and other Disclaimers

go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/content/06/12/05/love-life-legal-disclaimer

13. To Read About How A Representative Of The NSW Jewish Board Of Deputies Had Threatened To Shut Down The Love For Life Website

go here: Part One: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6616 Part Two: THE STEVE JOHNSON REPORT AND VIDEO: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6665 and Part Three: Latest Update On James Von Brunn: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6673

Conscious Love Always
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
action @ loveforlife.com.au
www.loveforlife.com.au
0418 203204 (int: 0011 61 418 203204)
PO Box 1320 Bowral 2576 NSW Australia

Arthur Cristian

Create Your Badge

Love For Life Discussions - Why Aren't We Free? How Can We Be Free?

Promote your Page too

The Cristian Family November 2006

Love For Life Legal Disclaimer

The information contained on this world wide web site (the web site and all information herein shall be collectively referred to as "Web Site Information"), under the registered url name, loveforlife.com.au, resides on a host server environment in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15203, United States of America.

The Web Site Information has been prepared to provide general information only and is not intended to constitute or be construed as providing substantive professional advice or opinion on any facts or circumstances. Transmission of the information is not intended to create, nor does its receipt give rise to, a professional-client relationship between 'Love for Life' and the receiver.

While every care has been taken to ensure the accuracy and timeliness of the information prepared and/or reported on this site, 'Love for Life' is not responsible for any errors or omissions or for the Web Site Information not being up to date. The Web Site Information may not reflect the most current developments.

The impact of the law, policy and/or procedure for any particular situation depends on a variety of factors; therefore, readers should not act upon any Web Site Information without seeking professional advice. 'Love for Life' is not responsible for any action taken in reliance on any Web Site Information herein.

'Love for Life' is not responsible for any action you or others take which relies on information in this website and/or responses thereto. 'Love for Life' disclaim all responsibility and liability for loss or damage suffered by any person relying, directly or indirectly, on the Web Site Information, including in relation to negligence or any other default.

'Love for Life' does not warrant, represent or hold out that any Web Site Information will not cause damage, or is free from any computer virus, defect(s) or error(s). 'Love for Life' is not liable to users for any loss or damage however caused resulting from the use of material found on its web site.

'Love for Life' does not necessarily endorse or approve of any Web Site Information linked to and contained on other web sites linked herein and makes no warranties or representations regarding the merchantability or fitness for purpose, accuracy and quality, of any such information.

The sending of information by you, and the receipt of it by 'Love for Life', is not intended to, and does not, create a professional-client relationship.

All Web Site Information is considered correct at the time of the web site's most recent revision.

ADDITIONAL DISCLAIMER

THE CRISTIAN FAMILY SUPPORTS
FREEDOM OF SPEECH - FREEDOM OF THOUGHT

The Cristian Family November 2006

Posted Wednesday 17th June 2009
Updated September 2011

NSW Jewish Board Of Deputies
Has Threatened To Shut Down
The Love For Life Website

No Freedom Of Speech - No Freedom Of Thought

Love For Life does not support harm doing in any shape or form. However, we are supporters of free speech and post articles, documentaries, etc, that represent a wide cross section of ideas. See the Love For Life extensive research library where over 6000 documents, articles and videos are posted: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/82. We clearly see the evidence of the destruction to MAN and the earth that has been caused by ALL religions over the centuries and are therefore not supporters of religions, cults, sects or any group that demands conformity of thought, speech or action, or has rules, regulations or rituals that must be followed. Religions, nationalities and cultural "identities" are formed as a result of the brainwashing we receive from childhood. They are part of the tactics the Establishment uses to keep us all divided from one another and fighting one another.

All religions promote discrimination and division, leading to hatred and even violence and murder. None of them have yet to produce a remedy to all the suffering, poverty, unhappiness and discrimination in the world. If any religion truly had the remedy to all the suffering on earth, there would no longer be any suffering. What have Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, Judaism, atheism and the New Age done to end the suffering in the world?

Since December 2006, there have been many attempts to take down the Love For Life website. Any attempts have been thwarted by Love For Life supporters inundating the harm-doers with emails, etc, objecting to them taking down the website for a variety of reasons. The trouble makers usually back off when they realise that they can post all their views, arguments, beliefs, etc, in the Love For Life website without censorship or restriction imposed. They get to see that even the Queen, Pope, Prime Minister, President of America, etc, can post all their views without hindrance or sabotage and that we support freedom of speech/thought which means we support the right of all sides to express their views.

Of note, there is a vast amount of information posted in the Love For Life website which we do not agree with but we leave it all up because we refuse to be biased, opinionated or self-centered/self-serving. Of the many thousands of comments posted over the years we have only removed posts containing secret links to commercial advertisements, terrible foul language, threats of violence and death, etc, and attacks on other people's characters that avoid the subject/debate at hand. Besides links to advertisements, we have taken down less than six comments due to the above. We usually leave everything up, all warts and all, even those posts threatening to do terrible things to Fiona, our children, our dogs, our friends, family & supporters, etc.

The Love For Life website has information from all sides on many subjects, whether about Islam, Judaism, Christianity, Law, health, psychology, mind control, vaccination, aspartame, MSG, Chemtrails etc. There are over 11,000 articles, documentaries etc on the website and they are so diverse that we are sure that everyone would be able to find something they loved and something they hated, if they took the time to search. If we removed all the articles hated by everyone, there would probably be nothing left! We are not anti anyone but freedom of speech is freedom of speech and no one should condemn the work of another without taking the time to research the subject themselves. Yes, there are articles by those who have a less-than-rosy-viewpoint of Judaism, but there are also articles on the dark side of Tibetan Buddhism (and it is very dark) for those who are interested in the truth: Tibet - Buddhism - Dalai Lama: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6271 Should the authors of these articles be abused and imprisoned for daring to challenge the widely conceived reputation of Buddhism as being the religion of peace and love and that of the Dalai Lama as a saint, or should those interested be allowed to study the work and come to their own conclusions? The same applies to all the articles, documentaries, etc, about Christianity, Islam, Freemasonry, New World Order, etc.

The Love for Life website also shows how the Rule of Law, the Bar, the Government, the Monarchy, the system of commerce, the local, national and multi/trans-national private corporations, all the courses and careers on offer from our universities, all the educators, scientists, academics and experts, the aristocrats and the Establishment bloodlines have also done NOTHING to end the suffering in the world. The website maps the insanity of a world where there is no help for those in need, just as there was no help available for us when we were victims of terrible bank fraud: "NSW Supreme Court Case - Macquarie Bank/Perpetual Limited vs Fiona Cristian - Victims Of Bank Fraud Condoned By Judges" http://loveforlife.com.au/node/5 (orchestrated, condoned and protected by an international crime syndicate/terrorist organisation of judges, barristers, registrars, lawyers, politicians, banksters, big business representatives, media moguls and other lackeys who, all together, put up a wall of silence despite our trying many, many avenues. After the family home was stolen and business destroyed we were left close to poverty and destitution caring for 4 young daughters. Three years later not much has changed regardless of all our efforts. Where were all the followers of all the religions to help us? Or do we have to be members of those religions to receive help from others involved in them?

The New South Wales Jewish Board of Deputies accused us of being anti - Jewish, see: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6616 and http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6665 because we had posted an excerpt from James von Brun's book: Kill the Best Gentiles: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6054 in which he blames Jews for the problems of the world. Obviously this is not our view because of what we have stated above. We do not hate anyone, whatever religion they follow. We are always open to talk to any religious leader or politician and meet with any judge, member of the Bar, experts, academics, educators etc to share the remedy we offer that heals all the divisions between MAN and MAN, and MAN and the EARTH.

Today, a representative of the New South Wales Jewish Board of Deputies is threatening to close the website down, because they have decided it is anti - Jewish and that we promote racism. What has the New South Wales Jewish Board of Deputies done to end the suffering in the world? Can they show that they are concerned with the suffering of ALL men, women and children AND ARE SEEN TO BE DOING SOMETHING ABOUT IT or are they only concerned with Jewish affairs? If so, they, along with all the other religions that only care for their own, are part of the problem, not part of the solution. The man who rang Arthur today was only concerned with Jewish affairs; he was not interested in our intentions or in anybody else, just as most Christians, Muslims, Sikhs, Catholics, etc, are only interested in their own. While we separate ourselves into groups, dividing ourselves from others with rules, regulations, rituals, procedures and conditions, we will never solve our problems.

No matter what we in the Western World Civilisation of Commerce have been promised by our politicians, religious leaders, scientists, educators, philosophers, etc, for the past two hundred years, all we have seen is ever-increasing destruction of men, women and children and the earth. None of the so-called experts and leaders we have been taught to rely on are coming up with a solution and none of them are taking full-responsibility for the fact that they can't handle the problem. All religious books talk about end times full of destruction and suffering but why do we have to follow this program when there is an alternative to hatred, mayhem and death? Why are our leaders following the program of destruction and death rather than exploring the alternatives? It seems that any mainstream politician, priest or academic are only interested in supporting the RULES OF THE DIVIDE, that maintain the haves and the have nots. For 200+ years, 99% of the world population have been so trained to pass on their responsibility for themselves, others and the earth, that the 1% of the population that make up the leaders of the rest of us are making all the decisions leading to the destruction of all of us and the earth. Let's not forget the education system that brainwashes the 99% of the population that we are free and have equal rights while, in fact, we are feathering the nests of those at the top.

At the root of all our problems is self-centredness, an unwillingness nurtured by the Establishment that keeps us concerned only with our own needs rather than the needs of others around us and the Earth. Instead of creating and releasing acts of love for those around us as gifts to benefit them and the earth, we take, take and take, until there is nothing left. The whole point of the Love for Life website is to show people the root of all our problems and to share the remedy. The extensive research library is there to attract browsers and to provide access to information not available through mainstream channels. If the New South Wales Jewish Board of Deputies can, after careful examination of our work, prove that anything we are saying is wrong, we will be happy to accept their proof. If they cannot, and they are still insistent on closing the website down, they will be showing themselves to be traitors to MAN because they are not interested in pursuing any avenue that can end the suffering in the world.

All religions, corporations and organisations that support and maintain the Western World Civilisation of Commerce are part of the problem because our civilisation is a world of haves and have nots, racism, violence, hatred, poverty, sickness, discrimination, abuse, starvation, homelessness, corruption, collusion, vindictiveness, social unrest, arrogance, ignorance, fear, war and chaos. While we support civilisation, we support death and destruction because ALL civilisations that have ever existed are apocalyptic by design.

If we truly want peace on earth and freedom for all, we have to let go of all that which keeps us divided, and come together as MAN, conscious living co-creators of creation. The Love For Life website offers a remedy to the problems we all face in the form of DO NO HARM COMMUNITIES: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/3641 For more details see here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6511 and here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/3385 - We also highly recommend that everyone read the brilliant Russian books called The Ringing Cedars: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/1125 - The Love For Life Website Homepage also provides lots of inspiring remedy based information: http://loveforlife.com.au - If you want to be kept up to date with our work please register to the Love For Life Mailing List here: http://loveforlife.com.au/content/09/05/14/mailing-list. We usually send two postings per month. Presently (September 2011) there are over 7000 registrations reaching over 500,000 readers across Earth. The website now (September 2011) receives up to 12 million hits per month. Since December 2006, over 100 million people have visited the Love For Life website.

Conscious Love Always
Arthur and Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
17th June 2009

The Cristian Family November 2006

Clarification Regarding Our Intentions
Behind The Use Of Donations

The Love For Life website is offered for free without a fee and without any conditions attached. If people are inspired to donate money, then we accept their gift and have provided an avenue for them to support the work we do through Fiona's Paypal or ANZ bank account http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8515. There is no obligation whatsoever to donate and all are equally welcome to our work and to our "time", whether they donate or not. Over the last 9 years, all the Love For Life work has been put out for free and it has often been donations from supporters that have enabled us to renew the domain name, etc, to keep the website going. While some complain that we have an avenue for donations, others complained when we didn't! Either use it or don't - the choice is yours.

Since Love For Life started March 2005 and website December 2006, Arthur has worked 16 hours a day, 7 days a week unpaid for much of this period, putting together the website and sharing insights to wake people up to what has been done to them, whether through the 11,500+ individual articles, videos, podcasts, debates, discussions, pdf's, research documents, etc, found amongst the 8,500+ posts, as well as helping many, many men and women over the phone, and through email, website correspondence, Facebook and YouTube, and creating the Love For Life food forest vege garden and Love For Life music recording studio. This is our life is a gift commitment to serve MAN/Nature/Earth but we are still severely compromised by "The System" and still have to give to Caesar what is claimed to belong to Caesar, which is where the donations help us.

Fiona & Arthur Cristian
Love For Life
21st July 2014