Love for Life

Here's an example letter to redraft an invitation to testify in order to hang yourself.

Hahahha its a reply to an accountant firm noticing their client that the ATO wish to send an officer to
meet with the client over a large transfer of funds from overseas to Australia, which always sets off alarm bells in this Gestapo land

Bestest
M

Hi Maxwell. Please find enclosed mindset letter as an example to how not to argue with anyone
and that you are happy to meet with the tax officer on your terms since you don't need/want them but they want you, so you dictate the terms.

Feedback appreciated. The letter could be mailed to yr accountant or it can be amended

regards
m

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Maxwell Smart
Principal
Peace Road
New South Wales [Postcode]
14th October 2008
Angry? (these guys are working for the ATO)
Accountant for
Lower & Lower & Lower
41 Depressed Close
Punishment [Postcode]

Greetings

Thank you for your written communication dated 10th October 2008 addressed to crown entity – security interest Mr M Smart and accepted by myself, the free man on the land commonly called Maxwell Smart, hereinafter ‘Principal’, on 13th October 2008.

This notice is to inform you Mr Smart is unlikely to attend the meeting of Wednesday 23rd October 2008 due to either unforeseen circumstances or impossibilities on account that he’s dead but that if he could he would in order to maintain his honour in settling all claims and issues alleged against him. In all likelihood he would ask that Principal pass on his apologies.

The good news is Principal can and offers to attend on behalf of Mr M Smart on the basis that

1. any questions asked by the interrogating ATO officer be recorded in writing so any required/requested replies are done in as honourable and accurate way as possible

2. that the ATO officer conducting the interrogation indemnifies all requested attendees, by affidavit, against using any information provided against testifiers

3. provide Principal a cheque for $2,000 made out to Mr M Smart in consideration of Principal’s valuable time. Naturally it would not be expected by any party that Principal donate his valuable time to any party he has no interest in or benefit from without some valuable consideration by the requesting party in order to consummate the agreement to meet.

4. It is agreed by the officer from the ATO that any alleged liability arising from the meeting against Mr M Smart or companies associated with him be confirmed by affidavit in order to constitute a lawful and valid bill and also that the officer on behalf of the ATO agrees to accept either offset of the alleged liability/debt by either tender of crown consolidated account E.I.N. XXXXXXXX in consideration for the debt/obligation or tender of a promissory note to discharge it.

5. Should said officer or nominee for the ATO fail to verify claim against Mr M Smart or companies associated with him, that they pay Mr M Smart a cheque to the value of their claim + 3 fold damages (Luke 19:8)

6. Interrogating ATO officer accept Principal’s right to digitally record the meeting to maintain its integrity

7. Interrogating ATO officer accept and agrees Principal’s private property is not required to be brought to the meeting.

In regard to the requested documents the dead fella bring to the meeting, I’m afraid for the most part, they don’t exist possibly because M R Smart neglected to keep such records and also likely because of the rather permanent state of his persona, namely that of a deceased, being a corp – oration.

The remainder is personal property belonging to Principal as the Holder in Due Course as evidenced by the enclosed UCC1 financing statement/security interest, unless of course the interrogating ATO officer can show by affidavit bearing his own commercial liability that he/she has lawful authority showing the precise law that evidences aforesaid lawful authority, to intervene in the private affairs of a man or woman and garnish their private property without the consent of the parties concerned.

In regard to the Tax Payers Charter, please find enclosed duly endorsed accepted for value and surrendered for value Charter without dishonour to issuer. Principal thanks issuer for offering said document to Mr M Smart, but due to the nature of his condition, the document or any other document for that matter including the Authorized Version of the King Jame’s bible, is unlikely to help him, in order to ‘detailing you rights in relation to your dealings with the Tax Office’ and if the intent was to issue said document to Principal then Principal humbly conditionally accepts the gift on the basis that acceptance does not forego/waive his higher rights and that there wouldn’t be any one else that could benefit more from its educational pages then what would be gained by Principal should he elect to return the document.

I may have some other points I wish to raise with the interrogating ATO officer which might include but are not limited by:

Show

1. the free man commonly called John and the free woman commonly called Alicia are subject to scrutiny and public investigation showing the precise law statute evidencing the ATO authority to examine private records from private people.

2. should the ATO or/and its employees/nominees/agents fail to substantiate their claim to authority over the free man and woman that those effected by unauthorized and un-consented to interrogation, harassment, investigation and scrutiny by personnel from/of the ATO cannot be sued and held personally liable under their own unlimited commercial liability for the injuries they cause.

3. if employees/nominees/agents of the ATO and the ATO fail to produce the document that evidences a contract with the free people of the land commonly called Maxwell Smart, Alfred Smart, John Smart and Alicia Smart that should the ATO proceed in this matter against aforesaid free private people it would not be a breach of their oath of office (to protect people), a breach of due process of the law and a breach of the Australian tax laws.

4. In timely manner any law that evidences Principal does not have the standing capacity and lawful right and duty to hold all ATO claimants accountable and personally liable for all injuries including but not limited to, negligence, delinquency, theft, extortion, harassment, malfeasance, misfeasance and non feasance of office, that said claimants cause Principal and members of his family should said claimants pursue the matter in the absence of any proof of claim.

Unless Principal receives written communication stating otherwise, it shall be taken that all parties to this matter agree and have accepted the above terms of Principal’s agreement and that the meeting shall proceed on the terms delineated.

Thank you for your written correspondence.
Best Regards
By,

Maxwell: Smart. Principal and primary creditor to Mr M Smart.

All rights, powers, privileges and immunities, whether actual, contingent, or prospective, reserved