"The Great Global Warming Swindle" - UK Channel 4 TV Documentary - Plus Regular News Updates

UK Channel 4 TV documentary: "The Great Global Warming Swindle"
1 hour 13 Minutes Long - 19th May 2007

Email received from Mark in the UK 19th May 2007

I watched this yesterday, and if you've got broadband/high speed internet, then I thoroughly recommend you watch it too ...

* If you have had an uneasy feeling that the global warming agenda is more a political one than an environmental one.

* If you want to hear a contrary point of view from the given "wisdom" * If you want to know why all the "leaders" and media "commentators" are pro the accepted global warming theory.

* If you sense the hand of neo-marxism behind this movement - and their desire to stifle progress in the name of protecting the environment.

* If you've been waiting to hear what OTHER scientists say about all this.

Then this documentary is a must see.
Here is the Google Link: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2332531355859226455
or try this version http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4499562022478442170&q=The+Great+...

It's 1 hour 15 minutes long, so make yourself comfortable.
But I assure you, you'll find it riveting and it's well worth the watch.

The documentary is also available in 9 parts in YouTube (good quality) - Arthur Cristian.

After you've viewed it, you may like to hear an audio interview with the producer - where he answers some of his critics - who are already mounting a counter-attack.

http://www.friendsofscience.org/

Glenn Beck w. Great Global Warming Swindle Producer Durkin - Here is a video interview located in YouTube with the producer Martin Beck & Glen Beck (6 minutes 45 Seconds) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=efe7LzQ36Pk (This is a wonderful interview - Arthur Cristian).

For, as this documentary shows, many thousands of people are on this "gravy train" and have no intention of letting the tax-generated funding (and their jobs) be taken away from them.

The Global Warming agenda is part of a neo-marxist strategy to halt world progress (particularly in the developing countries) and to bring about more and more regulation of society - as if we didn't have enough already!

Once you've seen this video, you'll have "inoculated" yourself against the basic thrust of the propaganda.

Watch it - and spread the word!

Yours in freedom
Mark

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Citizens Electoral Council of Australia
Media Release 24th May 2007

Craig Isherwood, National Secretary
PO Box 376, COBURG, VIC, 3058
Phone: 03 9354 0544 Fax: 03 9354 0166
Email: cec @ cecaust.com.au
Website: http://www.cecaust.com.au

Climate change mafia moves to suppress "Great Global Warming Swindle";
Call ABC to insist Swindle documentary be aired in Australia

Contrary to a previous report on Channel 9, ABC TV has now confirmed it has acquired the rights to broadcast "The Great Global Warming Swindle" in Australia. For a recorded message of this confirmation, you can call the ABC on 02 8333 4251.

However, ABC management is now under attack by what can only be described as the climate change mafia, who are desperate to stop the documentary being broadcast. So-called science "experts" are being wheeled out to argue the very unscientific position that the subject of global warming should not be debated.

They further insinuate that the ABC management has bowed to pressure from the ABC board, when it is very clear that the ABC has taken this step in response to grassroots community pressure; now, that same community pressure is necessary to ensure that it is indeed broadcast on national television, at the earliest possible date, and not stopped by those wishing to suppress scientific debate.

Call the ABC switchboard on 02 8333 1500 and insist that it be played A.S.A.P. If necessary, ask to speak to Program Manager Kim Dalton.

NOTE: For evidence that global warming is not man-made, but a natural phenomenon driven by the cycles of the sun, and a link to an on-line version of the "Great Global Warming Swindle", go to www.cecaust.com.au

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Phil,

When I rang earlier this afternoon, I got an officious lady asking "who said it was on hold?' -- as I started to reply, someone had switched on a recorded professional voice which told me that the issue of climate change was an important one and had become very controversial etc. etc. and the ABC intends to air the documentary, so we should keep checking their channel's advertised programming for the date. (or words to that effect).

I too smell a rat. Even money no show? Or maybe doctored.

Don

----- Original Message -----
From: Philip .............
To: Brian M..........
Don P.........
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 4:19 PM
Subject: Re: Fight suppression of global warming debate.

I rang the ABC number. The man told me it was expected to be scheduled July, and so far no pressure to stop it. I told him that if such pressure political was applied, that we could easily drum up a lot of public pressure in support of it..

Its time to start letters to the editor etc radio etc to ask greenies to warm up to the show if for no other reason than to find out how they have been conned.

Philip.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alan Jones 2GB Radio Sydney
24th May 2007

Dear Phil,

Please pass on

Alan Jones makes a few important points, but like most public commentary or debate on the beat up "Issue" of climate change and global warming, he only comes down to fragmentation and peripheral notions, serves no useful purpose and continues to muddy the waters. To illustrate: when he finished, nothing was established. No results. Needs more debate.

He's not telling us anything new when he talks of the extraordinary kind of stuff with which the public have to deal. in an attempt to sort fact from fiction. Problem is, he then goes on, knowingly (or unknowingly), doing what the Think Tanks (Big Money) want him to do; continue the"debate"
That is part of what they do; part of the Spin. Because, indeed, most of the public get their information from the likes of Alan Jones. Of course they are confused, because Alan Jones et al are doing what they are supposed to be doing -- ie sowing seeds of confusion by information & misinformation, seemingly both sides of the "debate" , importantly continuing it , but without the real element(s) for any final, truthful solution.

In the interim, the naughty ones get on with the agenda. And, unhappily, away from the media, there are still too many in the ranks of the people who would have better direction for all of us -- still falling into the trap of the foregoing (trying to logically discuss unfounded opinion and nonsense debate that is designed to go nowhere) - when they should know that what they are doing is part of the Spin. If we are sincere about change for the better, then the expose of machinations of greed and control, must be perpetuated.

Mr. Jones, if you would put a stop to the public's confusion, give up all the "debate" rhetoric and tell your listeners the truth. Encourage them to go find more, and to organise themselves to get their country back from the globalists. You might start with the following list:

1. -- There is a very powerful international group who give orders to all our Prime Ministers, and that is why we were given the GST, an innocent man, Martin Bryant, has been in jail for over 10 years and we murdered all those men women and children in Iraq. And about to do the same in Iran.

2. -- No. 1 is also the reason that our PM won't tell everybody that the Kyoto Protocol is part of a giant international swindle by the banks for more power and control of our water and minerals.

3. - The C.I.A have been paving the way for big business in our country for years!

Oh! I don't have any doubt in my mind that you already know Mr. Jones, and it should be obvious to anyone that that is the stuff that you should be telling them, but I can't wait to hear you tell them. But then, you know as well as anyone too, that if you did tell them you would be quickly and
decidedly warned off! By George, then we would witness once again, the real meaning of the media captioned "Conspiracy Theory").

The above numerated list, is finally, just symptoms of a terrible malady.
The question's naive, Alan, but how do we get our own television channel?

Don P......

----- Original Message -----

From: philip m............
To:
Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2007 5:37 PM
Subject: Fw: Climate Change 24 May 2007

----- Original Message -----
From: Ivan C....... To: Undisclosed-Recipient:;
Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2007 5:03 PM
Subject: Climate Change 24 May 2007

Climate Change 24 May 2007
Alan Jones 2GB

It is extraordinary the kind of stuff that the public have to deal with to try to work out wherein lies truth and fiction on so many issues. Industrial relations is classic.

But what about this issue of climate change?

There is no scientific agreement that such change actually exists.

Then you get outfits like the Australia Institute which calls itself a think tank, that would be sophisticating things, telling us that there should be a greenhouse gas levy on all domestic flights to rein in climate change pollution.

Well there's also no agreed body of science arguing that even if there were such a thing as climate change, that it's caused by man, greenhouse gases.

But anyone who argues that greenhouse gas emissions cause climate change is regarded as perfectly normal.

Anyone who challenges it is a sceptic or any challenge is controversial.

Now the ABC to their credit are going to broadcast a British documentary which questions the science behind climate change.

Well now that documentary is being labelled by some as discredited.

It sure is, because it challenges some of the nonsense that we're being force-fed.

It's even being suggested that the ABC board are behind the decision to screen the documentary.

Well I wonder why there's been no publicity about this documentary anyway until now.

After all, it went to air in Britain at the beginning of March.

The reason we've heard nothing about it is it didn't fit the normal mind set.

It argued that the theory of man-made global warming had become such a powerful political force that other explanations about climate change are not properly aired.

The programme shows leading scientists disagreeing with the view that the greenhouse effect of carbon dioxide emissions causes rising global temperatures.

A raft of scientists, not the first, argue that the sun's radiation is a better explanation.

The Vice-President of the United Nations-sponsored Inter-Governmental Panel on Climate Change Yuria Iezrael has himself said there is no evidence that greenhouse gas emissions could ever cause global climate change.

This documentary that was on Channel 4 and will be shown on the ABC highlighted research showing that the effect of the sun's radiation would be a better explanation for the regular swings of climate from ice age to warm inter-glacial periods and back again.

Indeed the scientists on this programme argue that the earth's climate is always changing and that rapid warmings and coolings took place long before the burning of fossil fuels.

Nothing new about this.

There's a raft of eminent scientists who've long argued that.

The scientists on this Channel 4 programme went further.

All this focus on reducing carbon emissions may not only have little impact on climate change but the unintended consequence of stifling development in the third world, thereby prolonging endemic poverty and disease.

These are points made by our own Prime Minister.

The roll call of experts on the British television programme was impressive.

Nine professors.

Experts in climatology, oceanography, meteorology, environmental science, bio-geography, paleoclimatology.

I made all these points at the time of this programme back in March.

They bear repeating.

Experts from MIT, Nasa, the International Arctic Research Centre, the Institute Pasteur, the Danish National Space Centre and the Universities of London, Ottawa, Jerusalem, Winnipeg, Alabama and Virginia.

But have a look at the outcry now that the ABC dare show the programme.

Virtual suggestions that the programme should be banned.

Don't let anyone see this.

Why?

Scientists disputing the link between carbon dioxide levels and global temperatures.

The only Australian political leader arguing that we should have a cold shower and a rethink is Prime Minister Howard.

As I said back in March, to date this debate has lacked perspective.

It still lacks perspective and balance.

I wondered aloud then why the British documentary had no media coverage.

Well it's getting some now, but it's coverage designed to discredit.

I wonder why?

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tuesday May 29th 2007

Dear Phil,

Amen! to all of it.

However, while, as you've previously mentioned, some debate is better than no debate, we see just another example of debate going nowhere. At best, another lost opportunity -- at worst, more debate food to create more debate WITHOUT the real truth, exposed. And the truth is being spread by many sources all over the 'States, Britain and here.

Nowhere in the article is the truth;
1. - Global Warming IS a scam
2. - The REASON why the Scam has been put in place is --
The bankster's Think Tanks set up the Kyoto Protocol. "Global Warming" and "Climate Change" are deliberately beat up "issues" by the banks and Big Money to get control of world wealth and to privatise water. All usable fresh water.

(The closest [and it's NOT close] of anything in the article that would impart the TRUTH of the whole scam of GW to people, was the following remark.
Dr Christopher Landsea, former IPCC author and hurricane expert: "It is beyond me why my (IPCC) colleagues would utilise the media to push an unsupported agenda that recent hurricane activity has been due to global warming . . . )
It's beyond him??

regards,

Don

----- Original Message -----

From: philip..............
To: Don............
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 1:11 PM
Subject: Fw: rejoice in life! well done Andrew Bolt you're a hero!

----- Original Message -----
From: Peter.................
To: bolta @ heraldsun.com.au
Cc: haynesp @ hwt.newsltd.com.au
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 9:57 AM
Subject: rejoice in life! well done Andrew Bolt you're a hero!

Miseryguts Anti-Life Journalists Eat Their Words

Good news at last! The intrepid reporter Andrew Bolt has written this exciting pro-life piece for the Herald Sun in Melbourne. It's about the wonderful news that though the "network"-controlled commerical media will not touch it nevertheless Australia's national broadcasting commission the
ABC will--in the interests of "balance in reporting"--screen The Great Global Warming Swindle.

Alleliua!

The season is the reason...

Now, here's St Andrew!

THE ABC's staff is in uproar. There's talk of mutiny, over furiously steaming mugs of herbal infusion.

The hotter-headed have even occupied the studios (what's new?) and now man hastily-erected barricades built entirely of sandals.

You see, an order has gone out. For the first time, ABC television will have to show a documentary in July that - gasp! - doubts man is heating the world to hell.

Yes, after showing endless reports telling you there's no doubting we'll burn in hell, the ABC is running a film that says: "Well, actually . . ."

It's naturally an imported British show - which ABC journalist would so dirty their hands? - and is modestly titled The Great Global Warming Swindle.

It quotes many sceptical scientists and was a smash this year in Britain, doubtless because sane people prefer to hear both sides of a debate. But if the public here will be pleased, some of the ABC's gatekeepers are not.

Take the ABC's top science journalist, Science Show host and global warming prophet Robyn Williams.

Williams advised the ABC not to buy Swindle and says the ABC is "verging on the irresponsible" to air something "demonstrably wrong".

That's brazen coming from Williams, an alarmist who insists - with not a scientist to back him - that warming may cause sea rises of 100m this century.

Reminded on Triple J last week that the influential United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) predicts sea rises this century, not of 100 metres but at worst 59cm, Williams stuck to his claim, despite conceding it "could be alarmist, yes".

Irresponsible? Demonstrably wrong? Hand Williams a mirror.

But I can understand the shock of his colleagues, few of whom realised there were sceptical scientists still left, other than the kind found in parks, begging for donations from top-hatted oil men, and twisting beards matted with twigs and discarded theses.

Take ABC 774 morning host Jon Faine, who on Wednesday abused a caller who said it might be nice to hear from scientists who - like him - doubted that most of this warming was caused by man, or was actually bad, or could wisely be stopped.

Scoffed Faine: "You've got something like, I don't know, the vast overwhelming majority of the world's scientists saying you're an idiot."

Sceptical scientists, he said, could be counted on his fingers: "There's no doubt you'll find a couple and then they'll tend to pull a few more in from here and there."

And now the ABC is giving air time to these "couple" of "idiot" scientists and a few crazies and crooks they'll "pull in"? No wonder ABC staff are so shocked.

But let me reassure them. Let me do what's never been done in an Australian newspaper and list some of the thousands of nice scientists who indeed are sceptics.

Perhaps then Faine might at last ask himself why he thought there were just "one or two". And why "his" ABC has so rarely let them speak or be heard.

1. Scientists who doubt there's a scientific "consensus" that we face dangerous man-made global warming.

Prof John Christy, IPCC lead author and head of Alabama's Earth System Science Centre: "I've often heard it said that there is a consensus of thousands of scientists (who say) humans are causing a catastrophic change to the climate system. Well, I am one scientist, and there are many, that simply think that is not true."

Prof Charles Wax, Mississippi state climatologist: "There isn't a consensus among scientists."

Dr Roy Spencer, formerly NASA's senior climate scientist: "The only consensus I'm aware of is that it's warmed in the last century."

Prof emeritus Joel Kauffman, University of the Sciences in Philadelphia: "(M)any professors of climate science realise that carbon dioxide generated by human activity has caused little or no global warming."

2. IPCC scientists who doubt even the IPCC, said to represent 2500 scientists who all believe in dangerous man-made warming.

Prof Yuri Izrael, IPCC vice-chairman: "There is no serious threat to the climate."

Richard Lindzen, former IPCC lead author and meteorology professor at MIT: "There is no substantive basis for predictions of sizeable global warming due to observed increases in minor greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide, methane, and chlorofluorocarbons."

Dr Vincent Gray, IPCC reviewer: "The continued fairly unchanging warm weather since 1998 shows no signs of increasing, and is probably influenced by changes in the sun."

Dr Christopher Landsea, former IPCC author and hurricane expert: "It is beyond me why my (IPCC) colleagues would utilise the media to push an unsupported agenda that recent hurricane activity has been due to global warming . . . I personally cannot in good faith continue to contribute to a
process that I view as both being motivated by pre-conceived agendas and being scientifically unsound."

3. Petitions of scientists who doubt the faith.

A 2006 letter to Canada's Prime Minister signed by 60 experts in climate-related fields: " 'Climate change is real' is a meaningless phrase used repeatedly by activists to convince the public that a climate catastrophe is looming and humanity is the cause. Neither of these fears is justified."

The Oregon Petition of Dr Frederick Seitz, US National Academy of Sciences past president, with the verified signatures of 17,800 scientists and technicians, including 2600 climate scientists: "There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere."

The 2005 Leipzig Petition of Fred Singer, professor emeritus of environmental science at Virginia University, and signed by about 80 prominent scientists and academics: "(W)e cannot subscribe to the
politically inspired world view that envisages climate catastrophes and calls for hasty actions."

4. Experts who once believed but now doubt.

Prof Nir Shaviv, Hebrew University astrophysicist: "Solar activity can explain a large part of the 20th-century global warming."

Dr David Bellamy, famed green activist: "Global warming is largely a natural phenomenon."

Dr Reid Bryson, top climatologist and founding chairman of Wisconsin University's meteorology department: Temperatures are rising "because we're coming out of the little ice age, not because we're putting more carbon dioxide into the air".

Prof Tim Patterson, Carleton University paleo-climatologist: "The temperatures match very closely with the solar cycles."

Prof Emeritus Jan Veizer, Ottawa University environmental geochemist: "The past record strongly favours the solar/cosmic alternative (to human gases) as the principal climate driver."

5. Local doubters.

Bob Carter, research professor at James Cook University: "That 20th century warming - the most recent of many previous warm phases of similar or greater magnitude - was dangerous or human-caused, or even that the warming has continued after 1998, all yet remain to be demonstrated."

William Kininmonth, former National Climate Centre head: "(A)larmist predictions have no sound basis."

Dr David Evans, former climate modeller at the Australian Greenhouse Office: "(N)ew evidence has weakened the case that carbon emissions are the main cause. I am now sceptical."

Ian Plimer, professor of mining geology at Adelaide University: Blaming humans is "pseudo-science".

6. Interesting doubters.

Prof Antonio Zichichi, World Federation of Scientists president: Plausible "man is not to blame".

Prof Edward Wegman, who led an inquiry for a US Congressional committee to check IPCC statistics: "The assessments that the decade of the 1990s was the hottest decade in a millennium and that 1998 was the hottest year in a millennium cannot be supported."

The late Roger Revelle, the professor Al Gore says first warned him of warming: The science is "too uncertain to justify drastic action".

Habibullo Abdussamatov, head of Russia's Pulkovo Astronomical Observatory: "Solar irradiance began to drop in the 1990s, and a minimum will be reached by approximately 2040. It will cause a steep cooling of the climate on earth in 15 to 20 years."

There's dozens more, but I've run out of space. Now count: How many has the ABC let speak? Why so few?

Isn't it high time it let just some of these sceptics - at least this once - explain themselves to you?

Debate really shouldn't be this frightening. Not if the truth is on your side.

Join Andrew on blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt

Love for Life

Search Love for Life

Extensive Research Library On Numerous Subjects - Other Serious Issues - Links

Main Menu

Navigation

Mailing List

Active forum topics

New forum topics

Recent comments

"The Great Global Warming Swindle" - UK Channel 4 TV Documentary - Plus Regular News Updates

You can now support the Love for Life Campaign

Name:
E-mail: