Love for Life

Arthur,
Expect lots of action from Telstra in the near future as the banned web site filtering is about to go to the vote (the wickileak list includes a "Christian" site, is that you?).

Kevvy needs to rush it thru so that the new hardware can be incorporated into the new broadband roll out. On completion it will be sold off to probably Lazards or Macquarie bank so that we can be satisfactorily controlled as all good slaves should be.

I would not be surprised if this new secret 1/2 billion dollar building in Canberra is part of the deal.

With the planned move by the New World Order coming badly unstuck Kevvy is going to careful not to be saddled with a treason charge.

Anthony

Hi Arthur...

You have not asked the question, "Where do you get the authority to enforce and adjudicate law on the earth?"

This is all about authority, jurisdiction is meaningless without it. If you do challenge Jurisdiction, you might note that they drop Australia from their mailing address thus putting them outside of Australian law. The same is done with the abbreviation of the Province as law only applies to the proper title of the Province.

You will find that the address on the Courthouse building will not mention Australia, leave off the Province or abbreviate it and may well use a postal code. The postal code is not part of the address of which the Queen created and can not be used or it again alters the Jurisdiction.

The Members of Parliament have a different address than that of the Courts and still different than that of the Law Enforcement. Thus the Court is making use of law in a foreign Jurisdiction and adjudicating law, where it has no authority to do so. Further the Court is not within provincial or country or in some cases town/city law thus are not accountable to anyone or Government in what they do. Further we have no way of knowing what laws if any they operate under.

There is a legal maxim in that if you take a benefit from one law, then all laws apply too you. Thus I would merely focus on what authority they have to be enforcing and adjudicating law upon the earth. Also if they can prove there claim to have more authority than our creator.

Also everything they do is based on the color of law. They are merely men and women, nothing more. Titles and names are hearsay. In fact by making use of a name rather than a calling, you identify yourself as a thing, property, rather than a free man of your creator.

They make use of the Bible and thus they have been noticed by God's word Genesis 1:26-29, that you hold. Dominion over the earth and over every living thing upon the earth. Further God blessed you, which is to make without sin , thus you are free and are without sin, they have no grounds to charge you upon the earth.

Australia is not defined as being on the earth, so where is it? How can they enforce law where there is no definition of the Jurisdiction of being on the earth?

rob

"Weird I have had no license for twenty years pay no tickets got arrested once then released after the RCMP was told he could not get public defense for what he did....They gave back my wheels to!! and get back my wheels for free when they take it yet you know all about my solution and cry I need a license?? whats with that?"

Minister Belanger (Robin) from Canada

Here are some of the comments received thus far....

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Try using Magna Carta, taking away a mans tools for making a living.

Bob

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

True authority and power is not created and granted by dead inanimate ink and words on paper. That is the illusion and fiction that most people believe and accept from the men and women doing business as so-called government.

True authority and power is created by the recognition, belief and vountary consent of the individual and collective granting the person(s) claiming to have authority and power. Without consent and compliance they are effectively powerless.

This principle is put into practice by asking/demanding from any "police officer" who intends to search you the following suggested questions (off the top of my mind):

1) "By whose authority do you claim the right or power to search me?"

2) "Are you claiming your authority and power comes from inanimate ink on paper known as a statute or Act that I did not consent to?"

3) "Are you claiming the elected representatives and public servants of the people granted you the power to assault, violate and coerce me against my will and consent?

4) "How exactly can a group of men and women claiming to be my elected representatives, grant you the authority to impose your will over me without my consent? Are you aware that is enslavement and coercion?"

5) "Can you factually prove I am bound and obligated by the Act your alleged power comes from against my free will and voluntary consent?"

6) "Are you aware that if you attempt to search me against my will and consent you are committing assault and battery and taking control of my life through coercion?"

I trust you understand the gist of these types of questions. Always place the burden of proof back on the police or anyone who asserts any form of authority, power or jurisdiction.

Jim

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

RUN FOR PRESIDENT OF YOUR COUNTRY.
RUN FOR GOVERNOR.

RUN FOR YOU PARLEMENT.. OR CONGRESS WHATEVER.

BUT RUN....

If you refuse to run, you are doomed to be ruled over by lesser men.

-Mosheh Thezion
http://mosheh.org/Home.html

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Arthur,

Below is a section that I have changed to red it is interesting reading about police violating the rights of men.
The website is where I got the article from.

Allan

http://mises.org/story/2486

-------------------------------------------

The Right to Self-defense
Mises Daily: Friday, March 16, 2007 by Murray N. Rothbard
[This article is excerpted from chapter 12 of The Ethics of Liberty. Listen to this article in MP3, read by Jeff Riggenbach. The entire book is being prepared for podcast and download.]

If every man has the absolute right to his justly-held property it then follows that he has the right to keep that property — to defend it by violence against violent invasion.

Absolute pacifists who also assert their belief in property rights — such as Mr. Robert LeFevre — are caught in an inescapable inner contradiction: for if a man owns property and yet is denied the right to defend it against attack, then it is clear that a very important aspect of that ownership is being denied to him. To say that someone has the absolute right to a certain property but lacks the right to defend it against attack or invasion is also to say that he does not have total right to that property.

Furthermore, if every man has the right to defend his person and property against attack, then he must also have the right to hire or accept the aid of other people to do such defending: he may employ or accept defenders just as he may employ or accept the volunteer services of gardeners on his lawn.

How extensive is a man's right of self-defense of person and property? The basic answer must be: up to the point at which he begins to infringe on the property rights of someone else. For, in that case, his "defense" would in itself constitute a criminal invasion of the just property of some other man, which the latter could properly defend himself against.

It follows that defensive violence may only be used against an actual or directly threatened invasion of a person's property — and may not be used against any nonviolent "harm" that may befall a person's income or property value. Thus, suppose that A, B, C, D … etc. decide, for whatever reason, to boycott the sales of goods from Smith's factory or store. They picket, distribute leaflets, and make speeches — all in a non-invasive manner — calling on everyone to boycott Smith. Smith may lose considerable income, and they may well be doing this for trivial or even immoral reasons; but the fact remains that organizing such a boycott is perfectly within their rights, and if Smith tried to use violence to break up such boycott activities he would be a criminal invader of their property.

Defensive violence, therefore, must be confined to resisting invasive acts against person or property. But such invasion may include two corollaries to actual physical aggression: intimidation, or a direct threat of physical violence; and fraud, which involves the appropriation of someone else's property without his consent, and is therefore "implicit theft."

Thus, suppose someone approaches you on the street, whips out a gun, and demands your wallet. He might not have molested you physically during this encounter, but he has extracted money from you on the basis of a direct, overt threat that he would shoot you if you disobeyed his commands. He has used the threat of invasion to obtain your obedience to his commands, and this is equivalent to the invasion itself.

It is important to insist, however, that the threat of aggression be palpable, immediate, and direct; in short, that it be embodied in the initiation of an overt act. Any remote or indirect criterion — any "risk" or "threat" — is simply an excuse for invasive action by the supposed "defender" against the alleged "threat." One of the major arguments, for example, for the prohibition of alcohol in the 1920s was that the imbibing of alcohol increased the likelihood of (unspecified) people committing various crimes; therefore, prohibition was held to be a "defensive" act in defense of person and property. In fact, of course, it was brutally invasive of the rights of person and property, of the right to buy, sell, and use alcoholic beverages.

In the same way, it could be held that
a. the failure to ingest vitamins makes people more irritable, that
b. the failure is therefore likely to increase crime, and that therefore
c. everyone should be forced to take the proper amount of vitamins daily.

Once we bring in "threats" to person and property that are vague and future — i.e., are not overt and immediate then all manner of tyranny becomes excusable. The only way to guard against such despotism is to keep the criterion of perceived invasion clear and immediate and overt. For, in the inevitable case of fuzzy or unclear actions, we must bend over backwards to require the threat of invasion to be direct and immediate, and therefore to allow people to do whatever they may be doing. In short, the burden of proof that the aggression has really begun must be on the person who employs the defensive violence.

Fraud as implicit theft stems from the right of free contract, derived in turn from the rights of private property. Thus, suppose that Smith and Jones agree on a contractual exchange of property titles: Smith will pay $1,000 in return for Jones's car. If Smith appropriates the car and then refuses to turn over $1,000 to Jones, then Smith has in effect stolen the $1,000; Smith is an aggressor against $1,000 now properly belonging to Jones. Thus, failure to keep a contract of this type is tantamount to theft, and therefore to a physical appropriation of another's property fully as "violent" as trespass or simple burglary without armed assault.

Fraudulent adulteration is equally implicit theft. If Smith pays $1,000 and receives from Jones not a specified make of car but an older and poorer car, this too is implicit theft: once again, someone's property has been appropriated in a contract, without the other person's property being turned over to him as agreed.[1]

But we must not be led into the trap of holding that all contracts, whatever their nature, must be enforceable (i.e., that violence may properly be used in their enforcement). The only reason the above contracts are enforceable is that breaking such contracts involves an implicit theft of property. Those contracts which do not involve implicit theft should not be enforceable in a libertarian society.[2]

Suppose, for example, that A and B make an agreement, a "contract," to get married in six months; or that A promises that, in six months' time, A will give B a certain sum of money. If A breaks these agreements, he may perhaps be morally reprehensible, but he has not implicitly stolen the other person's property, and therefore such a contract cannot be enforced. To use violence in order to force A to carry out such contracts would be just as much a criminal invasion of A's rights as it would be if Smith decided to use violence against the men who boycotted his store. Simple promises, therefore, are not properly enforceable contracts, because breaking them does not involve invasion of property or implicit theft.
"Simple promises, therefore, are not properly enforceable contracts, because breaking them does not involve invasion of property or implicit theft."

Debt contracts are properly enforceable, not because a promise is involved, but because the creditor's property is appropriated without his consent — i.e., stolen — if the debt is not paid. Thus, if Brown lends Green $1,000 this year in return for the delivery of $1,100 next year, and Green fails to pay the $1,100, the proper conclusion is that Green has appropriated $1,100 of Smith's property, which Green refuses to turn over — in effect, has stolen. This legal way of treating a debt — of holding that the creditor has a property in the debt — should be applied to all debt contracts.
Thus, it is not the business of law — properly the rules and instrumentalities by which person and property are violently defended — to make people moral by use of legal violence. It is not the proper business of law to make people be truthful or to keep their promises. It is the business of legal violence to defend persons and their property from violent attack, from molestation or appropriation of their property without their consent. To say more — to say, for example, that mere promises are properly enforceable — is to make an unwarranted fetish of "contracts" while forgetting why some of them are enforceable: in defense of the just rights of property.

Violent defense then must be confined to violent invasion — either actually, implicitly, or by direct and overt threat. But given this principle, how far does the right of violent defense go? For one thing, it would clearly be grotesque and criminally invasive to shoot a man across the street because his angry look seemed to you to portend an invasion. The danger must be immediate and overt, we might say, "clear and present" — a criterion that properly applies not to restrictions on freedom of speech (never permissible, if we regard such freedom as a subset of the rights of person and property) but to the right to take coercive action against a supposedly imminent invader.[3]

Secondly, we may ask: must we go along with those libertarians who claim that a storekeeper has the right to kill a lad as punishment for snatching a piece of his bubblegum? What we might call the "maximalist" position goes as follows: by stealing the bubblegum, the urchin puts himself outside the law. He demonstrates by his action that he does not hold or respect the correct theory of property rights. Therefore, he loses all of his rights, and the storekeeper is within his rights to kill the lad in retaliation.[4]

I propose that this position suffers from a grotesque lack of proportion. By concentrating on the storekeeper's right to his bubblegum, it totally ignores another highly precious property-right: every man's — including the urchin's — right of self-ownership. On what basis must we hold that a minuscule invasion of another's property lays one forfeit to the total loss of one's own?

I propose another fundamental rule regarding crime: the criminal, or invader, loses his own right to the extent that he has deprived another man of his. If a man deprives another man of some of his self-ownership or its extension in physical property, to that extent does he lose his own rights.[5] From this principle immediately derives the proportionality theory of punishment — best summed up in the old adage: "let the punishment fit the crime."[6]

We conclude that the shopkeeper's shooting of the erring lad went beyond this proportionate loss of rights, to wounding or killing the criminal; this going beyond is in itself an invasion of the property right in his own person of the bubblegum thief. In fact, the storekeeper has become a far greater criminal than the thief, for he has killed or wounded his victim — a far graver invasion of another's rights than the original shoplifting.

"It would clearly be grotesque and criminally invasive to shoot a man across the street because his angry look seemed to you to portend an invasion."

Should it be illegal, we may next inquire, to "incite to riot"? Suppose that Green exhorts a crowd: "Go! Burn! Loot! Kill!" and the mob proceeds to do just that, with Green having nothing further to do with these criminal activities. Since every man is free to adopt or not adopt any course of action he wishes, we cannot say that in some way Green determined the members of the mob to their criminal activities; we cannot make him, because of his exhortation, at all responsible for their crimes. "Inciting to riot," therefore, is a pure exercise of a man's right to speak without being thereby implicated in crime.

On the other hand, it is obvious that if Green happened to be involved in a plan or conspiracy with others to commit various crimes, and that then Green told them to proceed, he would then be just as implicated in the crimes as are the others — more so, if he were the mastermind who headed the criminal gang. This is a seemingly subtle distinction which in practice is clearcut — there is a world of difference between the head of a criminal gang and a soap-box orator during a riot; the former is not, properly to be charged simply with "incitement."

It should further be clear from our discussion of defense that every man has the absolute right to bear arms — whether for self-defense or any other licit purpose. The crime comes not from bearing arms, but from using them for purposes of threatened or actual invasion. It is curious, by the way that the laws have especially banned concealed weapons, when it is precisely the open and unconcealed weapons which might be used for intimidation.

In every crime, in every invasion of rights, from the most negligible breach of contract up to murder, there are always two parties (or sets of parties) involved: the victim (the plaintiff) and the alleged criminal (the defendant). The purpose of every judicial proceeding is to find, as best we can, who the criminal is or is not in any given case.

Generally, these judicial rules make for the most widely acceptable means of finding out who the criminals may be. But the libertarian has one overriding caveat on these procedures: no force may be used against non-criminals. For any physical force used against a non-criminal is an invasion of that innocent person's rights, and is therefore itself criminal and impermissible.

Take, for example, the police practice of beating and torturing suspects — or, at least, of tapping their wires. People who object to these practices are invariably accused by conservatives of "coddling criminals." But the whole point is that we don't know if these are criminals or not, and until convicted, they must be presumed not to be criminals and to enjoy all the rights of the innocent: in the words of the famous phrase, "they are innocent until proven guilty." (The only exception would be a victim exerting self-defense on the spot against an aggressor, for he knows that the criminal is invading his home.)

"Coddling criminals" then becomes, in actuality, making sure that police do not criminally invade the rights of self-ownership of presumptive innocents whom they suspect of crime. In that case, the "coddler," and the restrainer of the police, proves to be far more of a genuine defender of property rights than is the conservative.

We may qualify this discussion in one important sense: police may use such coercive methods provided that the suspect turns out to be guilty, and provided that the police are treated as themselves criminal if the suspect is not proven guilty. For, in that case, the rule of no force against non-criminals would still apply.

Suppose, for example, that police beat and torture a suspected murderer to find information (not to wring a confession, since obviously a coerced confession could never be considered valid). If the suspect turns out to be guilty, then the police should be exonerated, for then they have only ladled out to the murderer a parcel of what he deserves in return; his rights had already been forfeited by more than that extent. But if the suspect is not convicted, then that means that the police have beaten and tortured an innocent man, and that they in turn must be put into the dock for criminal assault.

In short, in all cases, police must be treated in precisely the same way as anyone else; in a libertarian world, every man has equal liberty, equal rights under the libertarian law. There can be no special immunities, special licenses to commit crime. That means that police, in a libertarian society, must take their chances like anyone else; if they commit an act of invasion against someone, that someone had better turn out to deserve it, otherwise they are the criminals.

"Police must take their chances like anyone else; if they commit an act of invasion against someone, that someone had better turn out to deserve it, otherwise they are the criminals."

As a corollary, police can never be allowed to commit an invasion that is worse than, or that is more than proportionate to, the crime under investigation. Thus, the police can never be allowed to beat and torture someone charged with petty theft, since the beating is far more proportionate a violation of a man's rights than the theft, even if the man is indeed the thief.

It should be clear that no man, in an attempt to exercise his right of self-defense, may coerce anyone else into defending him. For that would mean that the defender himself would be a criminal invader of the rights of others. Thus, if A is aggressing against B, B may not use force to compel C to join in defending him, for then B would be just as much a criminal aggressor against C.

This immediately rules out conscription for defense, for conscription enslaves a man and forces him to fight on someone else's behalf. It also rules out such a deeply embedded part of our legal system as compulsory witnesses. No man should have the right to force anyone else to speak on any subject. The familiar prohibition against coerced self-incrimination is all very well, but it should be extended to preserving the right not to incriminate anyone else, or indeed to say nothing at all. The freedom to speak is meaningless without the corollary freedom to keep silent.

If no force may be used against a noncriminal, then the current system of compulsory jury duty must also be abolished. Just as conscription is a form of slavery, so too is compulsory jury duty. Precisely because being a juror is so important a service, the service must not be filled by resentful serfs. And how can any society call itself "libertarian" that rests on a foundation of jury slavery? In the current system, the courts enslave jurors because they pay a daily wage so far below the market price that the inevitable shortage of jury labor has to be supplied by coercion.

The problem is very much the same as the military draft, where the army pays far below the market wage for privates, cannot obtain the number of men they want at that wage, and then turns to conscription to supply the gap. Let the courts pay the market wage for jurors, and sufficient supply will be forthcoming.

If there can be no compulsion against jurors or witnesses, then a libertarian legal order will have to eliminate the entire concept of the subpoena power. Witnesses, of course, may be requested to appear. But this voluntarism must also apply to the defendants, since they have not yet been convicted of crime.

In a libertarian society, the plaintiff would notify the defendant that the latter is being charged with a crime, and that a trial of the defendant will be underway. The defendant would be simply invited to appear. There would be no compulsion on him to appear. If he chose not to defend himself, then the trial would proceed in absentia, which of course would mean that the defendant's chances would be by that much diminished. Compulsion could only be used against the defendant after his final conviction. In the same way, a defendant could not be kept in jail before his conviction, unless, as in the case of police coercion, the jailer is prepared to face a kidnapping conviction if the defendant turns out to be innocent.[7]

__________________

Murray N. Rothbard (1926–1995) was dean of the Austrian School. See his archive. Comment on the blog.

This article is excerpted from chapter 12 of The Ethics of Liberty. Listen to this article in MP3, read by Jeff Riggenbach. The entire book is being prepared for podcast and download.

Notes

[1] For a development of libertarian principles of the law of adulteration, see Wordsworth Donisthorpe, Law In A Free State (London: Macmillan, 1895), pp. 132–58.

[2] For a further development of this thesis, see the section "Property Rights and the Theory of Contracts," pp. 133–48 below.

[3] This requirement recalls the scholastic doctrine of the double effect. See G.E.M. Anscombe, "The Two Kinds of Error in Action," Journal of Philosophy 60 (1963): 393401; Philippa R. Foot, Virtues and Vices (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978), pp. 19–25.

[4] On the maximalist view, furthermore, socialists, interventionists and utilitarians would, by virtue of their views, be liable to execution. I am indebted to Dr. David Gordon for this point.

[5] The great libertarian Auberon Herbert, in Auberon Herbert and J.H. Levy, Taxation and Anarchism (London: Personal Rights Association, 1912), p. 38, put it this way:

Am I right in saying that a man has forfeited his own rights (to the extent of the aggression he has committed) in attacking the rights of others? … It may be very difficult to translate into concrete terms the amount of aggression, and of resulting restraint; but all just law seems to be the effort to do this. We punish a man in a certain way if he has inflicted an injury which lays me up for a day; in another way if he takes my life…. There is generally underlying it [the law] the view (which is, I think, true) that the punishment or redress — both in civil and criminal matters — should be measured by the amount of aggression; in other words that the aggressor — after a rough fashion — loses as much liberty as that of which he has deprived others.

[6] For a development of this theory of punishment, see the section "Punishment and Proportionality," pp. 85–96 below.

[7] This prohibition against coercing an unconvicted person would eliminate the blatant evils of the bail system, where the judge arbitrarily sets the amount of bail, and where, regardless of the amount, poorer defendants are clearly discriminated against.
You can receive the Mises Dailies in your inbox. Go here to subscribe or unsubscribe.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi Arthur,

Why do you wish to "drive" anyway? Do you comprehend the word's meaning?

Why do you wish to be "licensed"? Do you comprehend the implications of that?

What makes you so sure that you filled out their paperwork correctly? Because you followed the instructions of some fellow from North America who told you that was correct and it had worked for a few people there?

How about some humility which says: "No, I don't fully understand the game they are playing, and if I actually did things correctly, it would work. So I must still have more to learn and I must still be doing certain things wrong."

I can tell you one thing you are doing wrong: You are not seeking to follow the Bible. If you don't obey the highest law, what makes you think someone else is bound to obey a lesser law for your benefit?

Blessings,

-Gordon

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi Arthur, in relation to the suspension of your driver licence, I have to tell you that all your paper work sent to then would not help you.

I have dealt with the SDRO before and two times after requesting then to send the matters to court they back off. Now I am deal with them again in relation to Red Light Camera fine they alleged I was responsible for and after lodging a Court Election they advised me they have uplift the suspension on my licence and they will take several weeks for the matters to be ready for work.

I have to say again as I have in the past that the paper work and demands on the SDRO with the alleged maritime law does not work ! It is because there is No evidence of that and further there are No cases you can use to support your case or paper work.

It would be better if you realize that you have to deal with the matters with the law as it stands at present until there are changes made and that will take many more people getting involved in the fight against the corrupt forces but for now there is no other way.

The way you seek to fight the SDRO with the paper work based on maritime law is a waste of time. I have found No evidence to support it in all the laws research I have been doing for the last 9 months and it is a waste of time, efforts and of money.

The only way you can fight the SDRO is by going to Court, but you have lodge a Court Election before the suspend your licence or give then Legal Notice that you will take the matters to court. You can only do that if you can justify the refusal to pay a fine. Now I can only say that you only solution is to pay the fine and the SDRO will uplift the suspension or fight them in Court.

If you need help with the Court matter let me know.

Sincerely

Palfaro

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We Love You ALL

https://sites.google.com/site/thegreattexasbankjob/Home/speculation-bubb...

So you'll KNOW:
http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt=A0oGkmt2oCJLXnUApPhXNyoA?p=Witham+Kn...

https://sites.google.com/site/thegreattexasbankjob/Home

WITHAM KNIGHTS TEMPLAR

Judson Witham
Son Of Swamp Fox

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A DL suspension means ONLY that he can no longer do commerce in/from/via his car.

He ought to let them know this so that he does not get into any trouble for not having a DL.

;-) Mary

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 03:03:41 -0800

Subject: FW: ARE YOU DRIVING WITHOUT A DRIVERS LICENSE???? – GO PRO-SE AND YOU CAN BEAT ALL YOUR CRIMINAL CASES & TRAFFIC TICKETS, DUI’S, MARIJUANA POSSESSION CHARGES, IRS CRIMINAL CHARGES, ETC., . . . WITHOUT AN ATTORNEY!!!! – PLEASE FORWARD & RESEND TO ALL
From: rcwcodebuster @ gmail.com
To: rcwcodebuster @ aol.com

From Luis Ewing at or or or or or or telephone: (253) 226-3741

(Note: Please copy and paste all 5 of my e-mail addresses listed above & below and ADD them to your CONTACTS FOLDER.)

I have 5 different e-mail addresses under
b.) yahoo.com>
c.) gmail.com>
d.) aol.com>
e.) hotmail.com>

New Web Sites: or

GODS LAW as written in the 1599 GENEVA BIBLE at says:

“My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast refused knowledge, I will also refuse thee that thou shall be no Priest to me: and seeing thou hast forgotten the Law of thy God, I will also forget thy children.” Hosea 4:6

“And putting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary to us, he even took it out of the way, and fastened it upon the cross, . . .” Colossians 2: 14.

“That we henceforth be no more children, wavering and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the deceit of men, and with crafttiness, whereby they lay in wait to deceive.” Ephesians, 4:14

“And we know, that the Law is good, if a man use it lawfully.” Timothy, 1:8

“Think not that I am come to destroy the Law, or the Prophets. I am not come to destroy them, but to fulfill them.” Mathews 5:17.

SUBJECT: ARE YOU DRIVING WHILE BLACK OR DRIVING WHILE POOR? – YOU CAN BEAT YOUR OWN CASES WITHOUT AN ATTORNEY AND I CAN SHOW YOU HOW!!!!

I am NOT a scumbag WSBA ATTORNEY!

I NEVER attended any . . . JESUIT OWNED . . . LAW SCHOOL!!!!

I am NOT a member in good standing of the criminally corrupt Washington State Bar Association “or” any other criminally corrupt State Bar Association!

I specialize in “serious criminal matters” and help people who want to appear and defend in person to fight their own cases [Pro-se] “without” an attorney and can help you beat all of the following charges:

1.) Manufacturing Marijuana with Intent to Deliver.

2.) Marijuana Possession.

3.) Possession with Intent to Deliver Controlled Substances. (Cocaine, Meth Amphetamines, Crack, Marijuana, etc.)

4.) Drug trafficking. (Cocaine, Meth Amphetamines, Crack, Marijuana, etc.)

5.) Are you a landlord whose renter got busted for growing marijuana and need help to stop the cops from trying to steal your house with DRUG FORFEITURE LAWS????

6.) IRS – Willful Failure to File Income Tax Return.

7.) IRS – Income Tax Evasion.

8.) IRS – Removing NOFTL’s.

9.) Driving While License Suspended.

10.) Driving Without a License.

11.) Driving Under the Influence.

12.) Driving While Intoxicated.

13.) Reckless Driving.

14.) Negligent Driving.

15.) Resisting Arrest.

16.) Obstructing a Law Enforcement Officer.

17.) Refusal to Cooperate and Give Information.

18.) 3rd & 4th Degree Assault of a Police Officer.

19.) 1st, 2nd, 3rd & 4th Degree Assault.

20.) Domestic Violence. – Are you being harassed with ANTI-HARASSMENT ORDERS or TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDERS????

21.) Malicious Mischief

22.) Criminal Contempt of Court.

23.) Civil Contempt of Court.

24.) Child Support – NEVER PAY IT AGAIN!

25.) Child Custody

26.) Want to sue the CPS Division of DSHS????

27.) STOP ALL COLLECTION AGENCIES and ALL CREDITORS dead in their tracks.

28.) STOP or DELAY FORECLOSURES!

29.) Federal Security Violations. (SEC).

30.) Washington State Department of Financial Institutions Violations. (State version of SEC).

31.) Washington State Employment Security Violations.

32.) Washington State Department of Labor Violations.

33.) Are you an INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR who is being harassed by STATE & FEDERAL AGENCIES regarding whether your own children or the people who are working for you are in fact and law “employees” or “independent contractors”???? – If so, you need my help!!!!

34.) BREACH OF CONTRACT LAWSUITS!

35.) Beat all NO INSURANCE TICKETS for FREE, ask me how????

36.) Beat all NO SEAT BELT TICKETS for FREE, ask me how????

37.) DO YOU WANT OUT OF THE SYSTEM?

38.) I can help set you up with ASSET PROTECTION such as Trust’s, LLC’s and Non-Profit Religious Corporation Soles.

39.) WANT TO OPEN UP BANK ACCOUNTS WITH NO SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER?

40.) WANT TO GET A CELLULAR PHONE WITHOUT HAVING TO PROVIDE A SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER?

41.) CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS THREATENING TO COME ONTO YOUR PRIVATE PROPERTY WITHOUT A WARRANT?????

42.) LANDLORD THREATENING TO EVICT YOU????

43.) Is the government or the thieving cops trying to use DRUG FORFEITURE LAWS TO SEIZE YOUR PROPERTY or CARS????

44.) Illegal Guns or illegal weapons charges.

I have beat all these charges either for myself or for many clients and many other charges as well, and you can too with my help!!!!

However, I do NOT GUARANTEE RESULTS PERIOD!!!!

Whether you . . . WIN . . . or . . . LOSE, . . . you contribute to 1 really really . . . GOOD CAUSE . . . and that is . . . PUTTING A WASHINGTON STATE BAR ASSOCIATION ATTORNEY . . . OUT OF WORK!!!!

THE 1599 GENEVA BIBLE at at TIMOTHY Chapter 5, verse 18 says:

“For the Scripture saith, Thou shalt not muzzle the mouth of the ox that treadeth out the corn: and, the laborer is worthy of his wages.” Timothy, 5:18.

“Charge them that are rich in this world, that they be not high minded, and that they trust no in uncertain riches, but in the living God, (which giveth us abundantly all things to enjoy.) 1 Timothy 6:17

“That they do good, and be rich in good works, and be ready to distribute, and communicate. 1 Timothy 6:18

The 1 and ONLY . . . SALES PITCH . . . that I ever give anyone is that dollar for dollar and page for page, you will get far better legal research and brief writing out of me than you could ever hope to get out of any private attorney or law firm.

If you are sick and tired of attorneys charging a lot of money to do absolutely nothing other than ask you to PLEA BARGAIN which means PLEAD GUILTY and PAY THE FINES then send me an E-MAIL asking me to send you my FREE FLYERS and my CONSULTING FEES schedule.

For serious inquiries only!!!!

Sincerely

Luis Ewing

AUTHORITY TO PRACTICE LAW . . . “WITHOUT ADMISSION” . . . by the WASHINGTON STATE SUPREME COURT: RCW 2.48.190, RCW 38.38.256, 5 U.S.C. 500 (b), RCW 26.25.010, RCW 26.21.005 (19)(a), RCW 26.21A.005 (21)(a), RCW 26.26.011 (19), RCW 26.27.021 (16), RCW 26.27.041, 18 U.S.C. 1154, 18 U.S.C 1161, 18 U.S.C. 2265, 25 U.S.C. 1301, 25 U.S.C. 1903 (4), 25 U.S.C. 1903 (8), 25 U.S.C. 1911 (a)(b)(c), 25 U.S.C. 1901 -1963 (“ICWA”), 25 U.S.C. 3631, 43 U.S.C. 1602, 44 Fed. Reg. 67584 to 67595 (1979), RCW 2.48.170, RCW 2.48.180 (7), APR 1.1 (a), GR 24 (b)(8), Sections 3275 & 3276 of the Territorial Code of 1881. See also CR 82.5 (a) & RCW 13.34.240.

Contact Tribal Court Lawyer Luis Ewing at (253) 226-3741 or or or or or

1 HAVE FIVE (5) E-MAIL ADDRESS at
b.) gmail.com>
c.) yahoo.com>
d.) hotmail.com>
e.) aol.com>

PLEASE DON’T FORGET TO COPY & PASTE ALL 5 OF MY E-MAIL ADDRESSES INTO YOUR CONTACTS FOLDER IF YOU DON’T WANT MY E-MAILS TO GET ROUTED STRAIGHT TO YOUR SPAM FOLDER BY YOUR INTERNET PROVIDER:

rcwcodebuster@comcast.net, rcwcodebuster@gmail.com, rcwcodebuster@yahoo.com, rcwcodebuster@hotmail.com, rcwcodebuster@aol.com, luis@luisewing.com

CAVEAT WITH REMOVAL INSTRUCTIONS HERE: This E-Mail is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510 to 18 U.S.C. 2521; RCW 9.73.030 (1)(a)(b); RCW 9A.52.110; RCW 9A.52.120; RCW 9A.52.130 and RCW 9.73.020 and is legally privileged and you do NOT have my “consent” for forward this e-mail to anyone. The information contained in this E-Mail is intended only for use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or attorney or agent responsible to deliver it to the Sendee, please destroy the E-Mail after advising by reply that you erroneously received this E-Mail. The receipt by anyone other than the designated recipient does NOT waive the lawyer or “of-counsel client privilege,” nor will it constitute a waiver of the “work-product doctrine.” Any information obtained in violation of RCW 9.73.030; RCW 9A.52.110; RCW 9A.52.120; RCW 9A.52.130 and RCW 9.73.020 is inadmissible in court pursuant to RCW 9.73.050 and further, anyone who forwards this e-mail to anyone else without my express prior “written consent” is liable for civil monetary damages under Washington law pursuant to RCW 9.73.060 and criminal penalties under RCW 9.73.080. The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential and may be hazardous to your preconceptions. FREE DISTRIBUTION: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed free “only” to those specific recipients listed above who have previously expressed an interest in receiving the information for research and educational purposes and have made a prior request for said information. If the reader of this message is not the intended addressee, the reader is hereby notified that any consideration, dissemination or duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited. RCW 9.73.030 (1)(a)(b)(c); RCW 9.73.050; RCW 9.73.060 and RCW 9.73.080 This message is being sent to you in compliance with the current Federal legislation for commercial e-mail (H.R.417 SECTION101Paragraph (e)(1)(A)) AND Bill s.1618 TITLE III passed by the 105th U.S. Congress. REMOVAL INSTRUCTIONS: This message cannot be considered SPAM as long as it includes: 1) contact information, and 2) a way to be removed from future e-mailings. If this e-mail communication has reached you in error, or should you wish to be permanently removed from the mailing list, PLEASE SEND ME AN E-MAIL REQUESTING THAT I REMOVE YOU FROM MY E-MAIL LIST AND I WILL REMOVE YOU WITHIN 72 HOURS FROM MY RECEIPT OF YOUR E-MAIL although it may take me 4 to 5 days to catch up to your e-mail because I get so many e-mail request’s for my FREE FLYERS from all over the U.S. or please return to the below listed address asking me to remove you to Luis Ewing, 1910 147th Street Ct. East, Tacoma, Wash. 98445-3499 or call and leave a message with your E-Mail address and request to be removed at (253) 226-3741. Thank you!

--
Luis Ewing at (253) 226-3741
Email1: rcwcodebuster @ comcast.net or
Email2: rcwcodebuster @ yahoo.com or
Email3: rcwcodebuster @ gmail.com or
Email4: rcwcodebuster @ hotmail.com
Email5: rcwcodebuster @ aol.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You might try sending this Demand For Discovery And Disclosure (attached format).

Since this is a 'legal action' against you, you should have a right to demand disclosure of their right to prevent a free will man from travelling in a manner that does not threaten or damage another party - since the actual proof of proficiency in operation an automobile has been accepted by previous licensing of the 'legal entity',

Arthur Cristian, and the current suspension of the license of Arthur Cristian has nothing to do with 'safe operation of an automobile.

You should also add a time limit to their response, and remind them that 'their silence will be considered their acquiescence to the statements on the demand. And use in any court proceeding that may arise from the driver's license issue.'

Eldon

-----------------------------------------

Notice and Demand

From: Arthur Cristian, acting as agent for the free will adult man, (male or female) commonly called Arthur of theCristian family
Reference:Driver’s License # _______________ of Crown owned legal identity name, Arthur Cristian or ARTHUR CRISTIAN

To: Concerned Party at CRA

Date: ____________

Comes Arthur Cristian and declares:

Whereas _________________ continues to demand, in the form of an assessment, invoice, statement of account, notice of fine, or such other demand document, threatens legal action for collection, to imposes set-offs, or such other actions of collections without due process of law indicating that this party has not the capacity to be served a properly drawn bill, nor the capacity to settle the alleged debt by way of the provisions of the Bills of Exchange Act of Australia, Division 2, Section 27;

And, whereas this party determines that such lack of capacity to settle a debt account by provision of the Bills of Exchange Act of Australia is based upon the assumption that the free will adult man for whom the party, Arthur Cristian, acts as agent in commerce is considered to be of slave status as property of the corporate Crown of the City of London, whose agent in Australia is Queen Elizabeth II, or her de facto Governor General of Australia. A slave does not have the capacity to contract with the slave owner.

And whereas, the free will adult man, commonly called Arthur of the Cristian family, uses the legal name owned by the Crown, Arthur Cristian, as his agent in commerce and trustee in trust of all his equity claimed assets. Thus, the free will man is the primary creditor and beneficiary of any bank, or other financial accounts established in the legal name Arthur Cristian, the trustee in trust of the asset values of the free will adult man commonly called Arthur of Cristian family. The free will adult man commonly called Arthur of Cristian family family is not a 'person' in law, and thus, he is not a a guarantor or surety for the Crown claimed debts imposed upon the Crown owned legal name, Arthur Cristian, nor is he subject to any rules or regulations arising out of any legislated Act of Australia or of a State of Australia, nor of any other Government legislation, especially where there is no damaged or injured party making a claim against him..

Therefore, demand is upon you, under the provisions of the Freedom Of Information Act of Australia and the Evidence Act of Australia for legal discovery and disclosure, to promptly produce proof positive the authority, means and date upon which the free will man, commonly called Arthur of the Cristian family, had the status of slave imposed upon him/her and was declared to be property of the Crown in right of Australia or of a State of Australia, which makes him/her subject to the statutes, rules and regulations of the Crown in Right of Australia. He/She does not consent to be identified as being the name, Arthur Cristian, or any name that may be assigned by the Court.

Signed,

for Arthur Cristian [written signature]

cc\ Minister of (driver’s licencing Ministry)

[Witness by Notary Public, if possible]

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Notes: (Not part of notice)

[Eldon's note: A 'person' is a slave owned by the Crown. A slave does not have the capacity
to contract with the slave owner by the fact that the slave is the property of the slave owner.
And the man became a slave owned by the Crown by a method other than contract of servitude,
and thus is not limited by the Edict of Queen Elizabeth I in limiting contracts of servitude to
5 years duration.]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

All I can say is. If you read all the Informer has and acted
accordingly, you would not have this problem. The fact is you would
rather believe in myths fed you all your life, than to act on truth.
To them, you are still a citizen slave. You really need to be the
alien they don't want you to find out. I attach what the Solicitor
general of the United States said, which applies to all countries, as
they all are corporations of the Vatican's Pope. You see, I happen to
be that non resident, out of contract. Yes, in getting a DL YOU are in
contract AS A CITIZEN of that corporation. Does not the application
for a DL say you are a citizen/ resident in contract ( that being the
corporation you reside in?) Sure does and you now can't deny you are a
citizen slave in any court. They will produce the DL and say to the
judge, here is his admission along with (what ever ties you to the
corporation, and there are many things.) that he is a citizen of new
south wales. Same here in America. Read on in the attachment why an
alien does not come under the corporations laws. The ALIEN, a Man, and
NOT a Person, has no CONTRACT, CONTRACT, CONTRACT with the
corporation. It's all up to you to believe in truth or myths. Myths
are so ingrained in you it feels more comfortable to go through what
you are going thru, that you don't want to let go of myths that enslave
you and billions of people all over the world. You all gave up the
Lord and sought Mammon. You would rather be a citizen of Mammon rather
than a citizen of the Lord, as stated in Eph 2:19. It's your choice.
The Lord gave you that choice and you just had to be a citizen of
something didn't you? Even if it was a citizen of Satan. Yes the
Vatican represents Satan. Satan is the head in the organizational
structure of the black Pope of the Vatican. The Informer put that in
his new book, The Myth and the Reality --- just who owns the United
States. Oh, how we are and have been deceived as the Lord said we
would be. But did not the Lord say if you choose Mammon, don't seek
help from Him? I think you will find that in any bastardized Bible you
can read, bar none.

Big Al

PS: Ron, here in America, pass this to the group wanting to be non resident aliens also.

322

.

MILITARY GOVERNMENT.

tinction between enemies who are subjects of a foreign government, and are therefore called" alien enemies," and those who are denizens and subjects of the United States, and being engaged in civil war, are called" public enemies. "

An alien owes no allegiance or obedience to our government, or to our constitution, laws, or proclamations. . A citizen subject is bound to obey them all. In refusing such obedience, he is guilty of crime against his country, and finds in the law of nations no justification for disobedience. An alien, being under no such obligation, is justified in refusing such obedience. Over an alien enemy, our government can make no constitution, law, or proclamation of obligatory force, because our laws bind only our own subjects, and have no extra-territorial jurisdiction.

Over citizens who are subjects of this government, even if they have so far repudiated their duties as to become enemies, our constitution, statutes, and proclamations are the supreme law of the land. . The fact that their enforcement is resisted does not make them void. It is not in the power of armed subjects of the Union to repeal or legally nullify our constitution, laws, or other governmental acts.

SOURCE: The Legal Classics Library War Powers under The Constitution of the United States 1864 tenth Ed Entered by Act of Congress In the Clerk’s Office of the District Court of the District of Massachusetts Specia

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Remember all they have is the colour of law....not law....

the bible is the law....bring it in...ask the judge to swear on it....watch what happens

however...do everything the fiction gives you within three days

I plead the blood of Christ...and bring the law with you and a whole bunch of Gods people into the court....

you are the court......since you are a sovereign and they have not proved otherwise...

and they cant otherwise they would be going against God himself...and

they do all the time....they blasphemy God and serve mammon

there are several question you can ask that they cannot and will not answer - ever

like....making yourself separate from the dead....the name on the birth certificate...
make sure when you are doing this...put it up on a a website and make it public for all to see
the court of public opinion is what we need now to show the world what the liars are up to

use the administrative process, done through a notary....
declaration as sovereigns dont notice....

step one - 21 days grace
declaration
of fault to them when the dont answer...and they most likely wont..
they have to answer each question or statement (and so do you by the
way so make sure you speak the truth on paper) step two - 7 days

declaration of default step three...3 days
declaration of notarial protest
declaration of impending lien - 7 days
declaration of impending lien - 3 days
declaration of lien....go and register a commercial lien...

then off to the court to get summary judgement

just a thought

for entertainment purposes only

----------------------------------

you dont need a license if you are sovereign
statutes and acts apply to them
the bible applies to you

of the sovereign sentient being wrote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

11 December A.D. 2009

Are you sure you need a "license?" Here, in "the
states," we distinguish between "traveling" and "transportation."
"Transportation" is a regulated line of commerce, but "traveling" is a right.

Of course, the "system" thinks of EVERYTHING in terms of
"transportation," so it's an uphill fight with a short stick, BUT, I'm
98% certain that the "funny money"-based system you have there is
identical, when it comes to choice of law and the applicable legal
model, to the "funny money"-based system we have here. I expect you
have a "right to travel," and I expect that if you'll satisfy yourself
as to the differences between "traveling" and "transportation," you'll
find you may not need a "license" to get from here to

there.

I hope this turns out to be helpful information for you.

Harmon L. Taylor

Legal Reality

Dallas, Texas

---------------------------------------

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [Fwd: Indiana: City Threatens $2500 Fines for Challenging Traffic Tickets]
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:53:54 +0000
From: Legal Reality
To: Legal Reality

11 December A.D. 2009

What we read in the note below is one "city's" in terrorem response to the defendant's act of compelling STATE to prove up its case. CITY is effectively "criminalizing" the exercise of the right of asserting a defense.

To criminalize the exercise of the right of defending oneself is a very Nazi-communo-fascist thing to do.

This mendacity shows up in all kinds of ways and places. The note below is just one more example of it.

On the good news side, the reality must be this. It's hurting the city, commercially, for those of us who know how to engage the commercial debate to do so. This sounds like a statement of desperation by the city, which means that we're getting much closer to the end of the "ticket" scams.

Regarding the pending end of the "ticket" scams, let's engage in a brief review: (be sure to check the statutes and definitions in your own STATE -- the following are conceptual; i.e., to know these is to understand the definitions in your STATE)

(1) "transportation" means removing people and/or property from here to there for profit or hire under the choice of law of the "place" called "this state;" (this term is very rarely defined anywhere, which should be our greatest clue that it's a scam)

(2) "vehicle" is a conveyance used for "transportation" purposes (at the time relevant to the issuance of the ticket); (key is the concept of "use")

(3) "driver" is the person behind the wheel of a "vehicle;"

(4) "motor vehicle" is a "vehicle" with a motor; (the actual definitions here will be much longer; the simplification intends to highlight the key concept, namely that "motor vehicle" depends "algebraically" on "vehicle," which depends "algebraically" on "transportation" -- if no "transportation," then no "vehicle;" hence no "motor vehicle." We're dealing with a system that lives and breaths on semantics; so, we are compelled to learn the semantics and to argue the semantics; these are commercial scams, so we must learn to think commercially);

(5) "operator" is the person behind the wheel of a "motor vehicle;" and

(6) "this state" is the "federal area," or the "federal zone," i.e., the "hover zone." Picture 48 contiguous States, Alaska, Hawaii, American Samoa, Guam, Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, and all the rest of the territories and protectorates. Now, picture above all that land a clear acrylic sheet hovering 25 feet above the land. To "see" that clear acrylic sheet is to "see" the "place" called "this state." I describe "this state" this way to communicate the concept that "this state" (1) has nothing to do with any State, and (2) has nothing to do with the Law of the Land as its fundamental choice of law. The Law of the Sea applies to all matters that accrue relative to the water or relative to the air; hence, I put "this state" in the air right above wherever you may happen to be.

All "places" that operated formerly under the Common Law and that presently function with "funny money" operate out of this exact same legal "model." All of them must have their equivalent of the "hover zone." Thus, all of them must recognize the difference between one in the Proper Capacity and one in the FEDERAL CAPACITY.

The STATEs MAY and DO regulate "transportation" activity in "this state." Whether one is in the "transportation" line of commerce at any given time is known best by the person receiving that "ticket."

Threatening someone with a fine for exercising his right of redress sounds very much like a screamin' violation of 18 USC §§ 241 and 242. There are likely witness-tampering crimes that apply, as well. This is a time to study into 42 USC § 1983 and related bases for commercial claims.

As we see in the information below, very few people are actually in a position to engage this kind of debate, so those who ARE "called" to do so are doing a service to their family, friends, neighbors, communities, states, and to the nation as a whole. Keep up the great work.

Harmon L. Taylor
Legal Reality
Dallas, Texas

----------------------------------------

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: Indiana: City Threatens $2500 Fines for Challenging Traffic Tickets
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 03:38:07 -0800 (PST)

----------------------------------------

http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/29/2985.asp

Indiana: City Threatens $2500 Fines for Challenging Traffic Tickets

Lawyer sues traffic and parking courts in Indianapolis, Indiana over threatened $2500 penalty for contesting a ticket in court.

Paul K. Ogden : Motorists who receive minor parking or traffic tickets in Indianapolis, Indiana are being threatened with fines of up to $2500 if they attempt to take the ticket to court. A local attorney with the firm Roberts and Bishop was so outraged by what he saw in Marion County traffic court that he filed a class action suit yesterday seeking to have the practice banned as unconstitutional.

"The deck is stacked against the motorist," lawyer Paul K. Ogden wrote. "To penalize that person for seeking justice seems wrong. I know it is done for the purpose of discouraging baseless challenges to tickets and clogging the docket, but in the process you are also penalizing people who have a legitimate defense and want a chance to present it to the court."

The city made explicit the threat of additional fines for challenging parking tickets in a November 30 press release announcing a deal between Indianapolis and a private firm, T2 Systems, to hand over operations of a parking ticket court to increase municipal income.

"Using Six Sigma process improvement strategies, it is estimated that under this program the city may collect an additional $352,000 to $520,000 in parking citation revenue over the next 12 months," the city press release stated. "If citations are not paid prior to their scheduled hearing, the city may request a fine of up to $2500 per citation. Upon receiving a judgment for an unpaid citation, individuals responsible could be subject to collections actions or having their vehicle registration suspended."

In traffic court, Judge William Young has been making good on the threats by routinely siding with police officers in disputes and imposing fines of up to $500 on anyone who challenges a moving violation ticket, no matter how minor, and loses. Those who pay without going to court do not face this extra fine.

"Unfortunately what you have happen a lot of times is that judges aren't particularly worried about whether what they're doing may be violating the law as the odds of someone ever appealing a $400 traffic ticket is remote," Ogden wrote. "I see it all the time. Trial judges flouting the law knowing they are unlikely to ever be challenged on an appeal because the litigants can't afford it."

Ogden is specifically representing three motorists affected by court policies. Toshinao Ishii received a ticket for driving 63 MPH in a 55 zone in February. Had he paid the ticket without challenge, the fine would have been $150. After Judge Young sided with the police officer in court, Ishii was fined $550. Motorist Matthew Stone was told by his doctors not to wear a seat belt over his chest as it could damage his cardiac pacemaker. He received a $25 ticket for not wearing a seat belt. After court officials threatened Stone with a $500 fine, he gave up his intention of challenging the citation. Adam Lenkowsky, who did not receive a ticket, attempted to attend a traffic court proceeding on September 23, 2009. He was barred from the court, despite the state constitutional requirement that court proceedings be open.

Ogden argues the court's practices in the first two cases violate the excessive fines clause of the state constitution as well as the clause requiring that "all penalties shall be proportioned to the nature of the offense."

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.atgpress.com

The Informer : http://www.atgpress.com/inform/indexinf.htm

The Informer is by profession a researcher of 40 years and worked for major 500 companies. He started the legal research into government as a whole in 1979 and went heavy into the taxation part, all phases, in 1981, and continues to this day. He is retired and uses his cognitive skills of 40 years to continue studying. His history research came about because of the government research that uncovered many inconsistencies in what people perceive to be true about government, but which is not. His inquiries and study led him to other historical researchers nationwide. These findings show governments are run by people other than the common man and woman of America and is not the "representative form" as people believe.

-----

11 mp3s can be downloaded from the following links:

327-The Informer Pt 1
http://www.mediafire.com/?zt5lt3wtwky

328-The Informer Pt 2
http://www.mediafire.com/?ia3wdkhzxng

329-The Informer Pt 3
http://www.mediafire.com/?lzynigwtkiw

350-The Informer Pt 4
http://www.mediafire.com/?vjdimmejmzy

351-The Informer Pt 5
http://www.mediafire.com/?ktqmtoudgyh

368-The Informer Pt 6
http://www.mediafire.com/?0zmtjymtomc

538-The Informer on the War Powers Act-Pt1
http://www.mediafire.com/?vziwuyfxoan

540-The Informer on the War Powers Act-Pt2
http://www.mediafire.com/?t3zhnjgmjtk

668-The Informer on Dependence Day
http://www.mediafire.com/?hlgmdtjoyhj

791-How the Informer opted out of the IRS system
http://www.mediafire.com/?a4hdexz2ngu

04-imanknoll
http://www.mediafire.com/?btfeqcz2jty

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

While I am unknown why the State Debt Recovery Office suspended the drivers licence it is my view that if it relates to debts not related to any offences relating to your drivers licence then it should be fought veriously that this is an abuse of power.
.
Drivers licences are issues as to the competence of a person to drive a motor vehicle and hence would have nothing to do about debts not related to using a motor vehicle.
.
Gerrit
.
Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka
.
12-12-2009

MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®
Mr. G. H. Schorel-Hlavka, GUARDIAN
(OFFICE-OF-THE-GUARDIAN)
107 Graham Road, Viewbank, 3084, Victoria, Australia
Ph (International) 61394577209
.
Email; mayjusticealwaysprevail @ schorel-hlavka.com
help @ office-of-the-guardian.com (constitutional matters only)

"CONSTITUTIONALIST" and Author of books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series on certain constitutional and other legal issues.
.
EITHER WE HAVE A CONSTITUTION OR WE DON'T!

.
Website;
http://www.schorel-hlavka.com
Blog;
http://profiles.yahoo.com/inspector_rikati

"JUSTICE IS IN THE EYE OF THE BEHOLDER AND CLOUDED BY HIS/HER SIGHT DEFICIENCY" .

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi Arthur

I was hoping they were going to let the fines go and reinstate your license, Alas another hoop for you to jump through, keep up the good fight

I would like to know more about the sovereign immunity and if that has worked for you at all in the past like it does for mark mcmurtrie?

In ten years time the “Old White Men“ will be gone from office and a new era will come which will change the shape of the NWO, some say let them build the structure then remove them from taking a seat, replacing them with people like yourself.

The only way to challenge and change the system is from within the system, time to run for a seat in state or federal politics Arthur.??

Kind Regards

Wayne Dicker

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Emailing: TRADE PRACTICES ACT 1974

from Bob Johnson

goto 44zz

Commonwealth Consolidated Acts

[Index] [Table] [Search] [Search this Act] [Notes] [Noteup] [Download] [Help]

________________________________________

TRADE PRACTICES ACT 1974

TABLE OF PROVISIONS

PART I--PRELIMINARY

1. Short title [see Note 1]
2. Object of this Act
2A. Application of Act to Commonwealth and Commonwealth authorities
2B. Application of Act to States and Territories
2BA. Application of Part IV to local government bodies
2C. Activities that are not business
3. Repeal
4. Interpretation
4A. Subsidiary, holding and related bodies corporate
4B. Consumers
4C. Acquisition, supply and re-supply
4D. Exclusionary provisions
4E. Market
4F. References to purpose or reason
4G. Lessening of competition to include preventing or hindering competition
4H. Application of Act in relation to leases and licences of land and buildings
4J. Joint ventures
4K. Loss or damage to include injury
4KA. Personal injury
4L. Severability
4M. Saving of law relating to restraint of trade and breaches of confidence
4N. Extended application of Part IIIA
5. Extended application of Parts IV, IVA, V, VC etc.
6. Extended application of Parts IV, IVA, IVB, V, VA and VC
6AA. Application of the Criminal Code

PART II--THE AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION

6A. Establishment of Commission
7. Constitution of Commission
8. Terms and conditions of appointment
8A. Associate members
8AB. State/Territory AER members taken to be associate members
9. Remuneration
10. Deputy Chairpersons
11. Acting Chairperson
12. Leave of absence
13. Termination of appointment of members of the Commission
14. Termination of appointment of associate members of the Commission
15. Resignation
16. Arrangement of business
17. Disclosure of interests by members
18. Meetings of Commission
19. Chairperson may direct Commission to sit in Divisions
25. Delegation by Commission
26. Delegation by Commission in relation to unconscionable conduct and consumer protection
27. Staff of Commission
27A. Consultants
28. Functions of Commission in relation to dissemination of information, law reform and research
29. Commission to comply with directions of Minister and requirements of the Parliament

PART IIA--THE NATIONAL COMPETITION COUNCIL

29A. Establishment of Council
29B. Functions and powers of Council
29BA. Commonwealth consent to conferral of functions etc. on Council
29BB. How duty is imposed
29BC. When a State/Territory energy law imposes a duty
29C. Membership of Council
29D. Terms and conditions of office
29E. Acting Council President
29F. Remuneration of Councillors
29G. Leave of absence
29H. Termination of appointment of Councillors
29I. Resignation of Councillors
29J. Arrangement of Council business
29K. Disclosure of interests by Councillors
29L. Council meetings
29M. Staff to help Council
29N. Consultants
29O. Annual report

PART III--THE AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION TRIBUNAL

29P. Definition
30. Constitution of Tribunal
31. Qualifications of members of Tribunal
31A. Appointment of Judge as presidential member of Tribunal not to affect tenure etc.
32. Terms and conditions of appointment
33. Remuneration and allowances of members of Tribunal
34. Acting appointments
35. Suspension and removal of members of Tribunal
36. Resignation
37. Constitution of Tribunal for particular matters
38. Validity of determinations
39. President may give directions
40. Disclosure of interests by members of Tribunal
41. Presidential member to preside
42. Decision of questions
43. Member of Tribunal ceasing to be available
43A. Counsel assisting Tribunal
43B. Consultants
44. Staff of Tribunal
44A. Acting appointments

PART IIIAA--THE AUSTRALIAN ENERGY REGULATOR

Division 1--Preliminary

44AB. Definitions
44AC. This Part binds the Crown
44AD. Extra-territorial operation

Division 2--Establishment of the AER

44AE. Establishment of the AER
44AF. AER to hold money and property on behalf of the Commonwealth
44AG. Constitution of the AER

Division 3--Functions and powers of the AER

44AH. Commonwealth functions
44AI. Commonwealth consent to conferral of functions etc. on AER
44AJ. How duty is imposed
44AK. When a State/Territory energy law imposes a duty
44AL. Powers of the AER

Division 4--Administrative provisions relating to the AER

Subdivision A--Appointment etc

44AM. Appointment of Commonwealth AER member
44AN. Membership of AER and Commission
44AO. Acting appointment of Commonwealth AER member
44AP. Appointment of State/Territory AER members
44AQ. Acting appointment of State/Territory AER member
44AR. AER Chair
44AS. Acting AER Chair
44AT. Remuneration of AER members
44AU. Additional remuneration of AER Chair
44AV. Leave of absence
44AW. Other terms and conditions
44AX. Outside employment
44AY. Disclosure of interests
44AZ. Resignation
44AAB. Termination of appointment

Subdivision B--Staff etc

44AAC. Staff etc. to assist the AER

Subdivision C--Meetings of the AER etc

44AAD. Meetings
44AAE. Resolutions without meetings
44AAEA. Arbitration

Subdivision D--Miscellaneous

44AAF. Confidentiality
44AAG. Federal Court may make certain orders
44AAGA. Federal Court may order disconnection if an event specified in the National Electricity Rules occurs
44AAH. Delegation by the AER
44AAI. Fees
44AAJ. Annual report
44AAK. Regulations may deal with transitional matters

PART IIIA--ACCESS TO SERVICES

Division 1--Preliminary

44AA. Objects of Part
44B. Definitions
44C. How this Part applies to partnerships and joint ventures
44D. Meaning of designated Minister
44DA. The principles in the Competition Principles Agreement have status as guidelines
44E. This Part binds the Crown

Division 2--Declared services

Subdivision A--Recommendation by the Council

44F. Person may request recommendation
44G. Limits on the Council recommending declaration of a service
44GA. Target time limits on Council recommendation
44GB. Council may invite public submissions on the application
44GC. Council must publish its recommendation

Subdivision B--Declaration by the designated Minister

44H. Designated Minister may declare a service
44HA. Designated Minister must publish his or her decision
44I. Duration and effect of declaration
44J. Revocation of declaration
44JA. Target time limits on designated Minister's revocation decision
44K. Review of declaration
44L. Review of decision not to revoke a declaration

Division 2A--Effective access regimes

Subdivision A--Recommendation by Council

44M. Recommendation for a Ministerial decision on effectiveness of access regime

Subdivision B--Decision by Commonwealth Minister

44N. Ministerial decision on effectiveness of access regime

Subdivision C--Extensions of Commonwealth Minister's decision

44NA. Recommendation by Council
44NB. Decision by the Commonwealth Minister

Subdivision D--Procedural provisions

44NC. Target time limits--Council
44ND. Target time limits--Commonwealth Minister
44NE. Council may invite public submissions
44NF. Publication--Council
44NG. Publication--Commonwealth Minister

Subdivision E--Review of decisions

44O. Review of Ministerial decision on effectiveness of access regime

Subdivision F--State or Territory ceasing to be a party to Competition Principles Agreement

44P. State or Territory ceasing to be a party to Competition Principles Agreement

Division 2B--Competitive tender processes for government owned facilities

44PA. Approval of competitive tender process
44PB. Report on conduct of tender process
44PC. Revocation of approval decision
44PD. Target time limits for Commission decisions
44PE. Commission may invite public submissions
44PF. Commission must publish its decisions
44PG. Review of Commission's initial decision
44PH. Review of decision to revoke an approval

Division 2C--Register of decisions and declarations

44Q. Register of decisions and declarations

Division 3--Access to declared services

Subdivision A--Scope of Division

44R. Constitutional limits on operation of this Division

Subdivision B--Notification of access disputes

44S. Notification of access disputes
44T. Withdrawal of notifications

Subdivision C--Arbitration of access disputes

44U. Parties to the arbitration
44V. Determination by Commission
44W. Restrictions on access determinations
44X. Matters that the Commission must take into account
44XA. Target time limits for Commission's final determination
44Y. Commission may terminate arbitration in certain cases

Subdivision D--Procedure in arbitrations

44Z. Constitution of Commission for conduct of arbitration
44ZA. Member of the Commission presiding at an arbitration
44ZB. Reconstitution of Commission
44ZC. Determination of questions
44ZD. Hearing to be in private
44ZE. Right to representation
44ZF. Procedure of Commission
44ZG. Particular powers of Commission
44ZH. Power to take evidence on oath or affirmation
44ZI. Failing to attend as a witness
44ZJ. Failing to answer questions etc.
44ZK. Intimidation etc.
44ZL. Party may request Commission to treat material as confidential
44ZM. Sections 18 and 19 do not apply to the Commission in an arbitration
44ZN. Parties to pay costs of an arbitration
44ZNA. Joint arbitration hearings

Subdivision DA--Arbitration reports

44ZNB. Arbitration reports

Subdivision E--Effect of determinations

44ZO. Operation of final determinations
44ZOA. Effect and duration of interim determinations

Subdivision F--Review of final determinations

44ZP. Review by Tribunal
44ZQ. Provisions that do not apply in relation to a Tribunal review
44ZR. Appeals to Federal Court from determinations of the Tribunal
44ZS. Operation and implementation of a determination that is subject to appeal
44ZT. Transmission of documents

Subdivision G--Variation and revocation of determinations

44ZU. Variation of final determinations
44ZUA. Variation and revocation of interim determinations

Division 4--Registered contracts for access to declared services

44ZV. Constitutional limits on operation of this Division
44ZW. Registration of contract
44ZX. Review of decision not to register contract
44ZY. Effect of registration of contract

Division 5--Hindering access to declared services

44ZZ. Prohibition on hindering access to declared services

Division 6--Access undertakings and access codes for services

Subdivision A--Giving of access undertakings and access codes

44ZZA. Access undertakings by providers
44ZZAA. Access codes prepared by industry bodies
44ZZAB. Commission may rely on industry body consultations

Subdivision B--Effect of access undertakings and access codes

44ZZBA. When access undertakings and access codes come into operation

Subdivision C--Extensions of access undertakings and access codes

44ZZBB. Extensions of access undertakings and access codes

Subdivision D--Procedural provisions

44ZZBC. Target time limits for Commission decisions
44ZZBD. Commission may invite public submissions
44ZZBE. Commission must publish its decisions

Subdivision E--Review of decisions

44ZZBF. Review of decisions

Subdivision F--Register of access undertakings and access codes

44ZZC. Register of access undertakings and access codes

Division 6A--Pricing principles for access disputes and access undertakings or codes

44ZZCA. Pricing principles for access disputes and access undertakings or codes

Division 6B--Overlap among determinations, registered contracts and access undertakings

44ZZCB. Deferring access disputes or access undertakings
44ZZCC. Overlap between determinations and access undertakings
44ZZCD. Overlap between registered contracts and access undertakings

Division 7--Enforcement and remedies

44ZZD. Enforcement of determinations
44ZZE. Enforcement of prohibition on hindering access
44ZZF. Consent injunctions
44ZZG. Interim injunctions
44ZZH. Factors relevant to granting a restraining injunction
44ZZI. Factors relevant to granting a mandatory injunction
44ZZJ. Enforcement of access undertakings
44ZZK. Discharge or variation of injunction or other order

Division 8--Miscellaneous

44ZZL. Register of determinations
44ZZM. Commonwealth consent to conferral of functions etc. on the Commission or Tribunal by State or Territory laws
44ZZMA. How duty is imposed
44ZZMB. When a law of a State or Territory imposes a duty
44ZZN. Compensation for acquisition of property
44ZZNA. Operation of Parts IV and VII not affected by this Part
44ZZO. Conduct by directors, servants or agents
44ZZOA. Target time limits for Tribunal decisions
44ZZP. Regulations about review by the Tribunal
44ZZQ. Regulations about fees for inspection etc. of registers
44ZZR. Procedure of the Tribunal when performing functions under a State/Territory energy law or a designated Commonwealth energy law

PART IV--RESTRICTIVE TRADE PRACTICES

Division 1--Cartel conduct

Subdivision A--Introduction

44ZZRA. Simplified outline
44ZZRB. Definitions
44ZZRC. Extended meaning of party
44ZZRD. Cartel provisions
44ZZRE. Meaning of expressions in other provisions of this Act

Subdivision B--Offences etc

44ZZRF. Making a contract etc. containing a cartel provision
44ZZRG. Giving effect to a cartel provision
44ZZRH. Determining guilt
44ZZRI. Court may make related civil orders

Subdivision C--Civil penalty provisions

44ZZRJ. Making a contract etc. containing a cartel provision
44ZZRK. Giving effect to a cartel provision

Subdivision D--Exceptions

44ZZRL. Conduct notified
44ZZRM. Cartel provision subject to grant of authorisation
44ZZRN. Contracts, arrangements or understandings between related bodies corporate
44ZZRO. Joint ventures--prosecution
44ZZRP. Joint ventures--civil penalty proceedings
44ZZRQ. Covenants affecting competition
44ZZRR. Resale price maintenance
44ZZRS. Exclusive dealing
44ZZRT. Dual listed company arrangement
44ZZRU. Acquisition of shares or assets
44ZZRV. Collective acquisition of goods or services by the parties to a contract, arrangement or understanding

Division 2--Other provisions

45. Contracts, arrangements or understandings that restrict dealings or affect competition
45B. Covenants affecting competition
45C. Covenants in relation to prices
45D. Secondary boycotts for the purpose of causing substantial loss or damage
45DA. Secondary boycotts for the purpose of causing substantial lessening of competition
45DB. Boycotts affecting trade or commerce
45DC. Involvement and liability of employee organisations
45DD. Situations in which boycotts permitted
45E. Prohibition of contracts, arrangements or understandings affecting the supply or acquisition of goods or services
45EA. Provisions contravening section 45E not to be given effect
45EB. Sections 45D to 45EA do not affect operation of other provisions of Part
46. Misuse of market power
46A. Misuse of market power--corporation with substantial degree of power in trans-Tasman market
46B. No immunity from jurisdiction in relation to certain New Zealand laws
47. Exclusive dealing
48. Resale price maintenance
49. Dual listed company arrangements that affect competition
50. Prohibition of acquisitions that would result in a substantial lessening of competition
50A. Acquisitions that occur outside Australia
51. Exceptions
51AAA. Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws

PART IVA--UNCONSCIONABLE CONDUCT

51AAB. Part does not apply to financial services
51AA. Unconscionable conduct within the meaning of the unwritten law of the States and Territories
51AB. Unconscionable conduct
51AC. Unconscionable conduct in business transactions
51ACAA. Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws

PART IVB--INDUSTRY CODES

51ACA. Definitions
51AD. Contravention of industry codes
51AE. Regulations relating to industry codes
51AEA. Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws

PART V--CONSUMER PROTECTION

Division 1--Unfair practices

51AF. Part does not apply to financial services
51A. Interpretation
52. Misleading or deceptive conduct
53. False or misleading representations
53A. False representations and other misleading or offensive conduct in relation to land
53B. Misleading conduct in relation to employment
53C. Single price to be stated in certain circumstances
54. Offering gifts and prizes
55. Misleading conduct to which Industrial Property Convention applies
55A. Certain misleading conduct in relation to services
56. Bait advertising
57. Referral selling
58. Accepting payment without intending or being able to supply as ordered
59. Misleading representations about certain business activities
60. Harassment and coercion
63A. Unsolicited credit and debit cards
64. Assertion of right to payment for unsolicited goods or services or for making entry in directory
65. Liability of recipient of unsolicited goods
65A. Application of provisions of Division to prescribed information providers

Division 1AAA--Pyramid selling

65AAA. Overview
65AAB. Definitions
65AAC. Pyramid selling schemes--participation
65AAD. What is a pyramid selling scheme?
65AAE. Marketing schemes--are they pyramid selling schemes?

Division 1AA--Country of origin representations

Subdivision A--General

65AA. Overview
65AB. General test for country of origin representations
65AC. Test for representations that goods are product of/produce of a country
65AD. Test for representations made by means of prescribed logo
65AE. Substantial transformation of goods
65AF. Method of working out costs of production or manufacture

Subdivision B--Cost of production or manufacture of goods

65AG. Definitions
65AH. Cost of producing or manufacturing goods
65AJ. Expenditure on materials
65AK. Expenditure on labour
65AL. Expenditure on overheads
65AM. Regulations may prescribe rules for determining the local percentage costs of production or manufacture

Subdivision C--Evidentiary matters

65AN. Proceedings relating to false, misleading or deceptive conduct or representations

Division 1A--Product safety and product information

65B. Warning notice to public
65C. Product safety standards and unsafe goods
65D. Product information standards
65E. Power of Minister to declare product safety or information standards
65F. Compulsory product recall
65G. Compliance with product recall order
65H. Loss or damage caused by contravention of product recall order
65J. Opportunity for conference to be afforded before certain powers exercised
65K. Recommendation after conclusion of conference
65L. Exception in case of danger to public
65M. Conference after goods banned
65N. Recommendation after conclusion of conference
65P. Minister to have regard to recommendation of Commission
65Q. Power to obtain information, documents and evidence
65R. Notification of voluntary recall
65S. Copies of certain notices to be given to suppliers or published in certain newspapers
65T. Certain action not to affect insurance contracts

Division 2--Conditions and warranties in consumer transactions

66. Interpretation
66A. Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods
67. Conflict of laws
68. Application of provisions not to be excluded or modified
68A. Limitation of liability for breach of certain conditions or warranties
68B. Limitation of liability in relation to supply of recreational services
69. Implied undertakings as to title, encumbrances and quiet possession
70. Supply by description
71. Implied undertakings as to quality or fitness
72. Supply by sample
73. Liability for loss or damage from breach of certain contracts
73A. Continuing credit contract
73B. Loan contract
74. Warranties in relation to the supply of services

Division 2A--Actions against manufacturers and importers of goods

74A. Interpretation
74B. Actions in respect of unsuitable goods
74C. Actions in respect of false descriptions
74D. Actions in respect of goods of unmerchantable quality
74E. Actions in respect of non-correspondence with samples etc.
74F. Actions in respect of failure to provide facilities for repairs or parts
74G. Actions in respect of non-compliance with express warranty
74H. Right of seller to recover against manufacturer or importer
74J. Time for commencing actions
74K. Application of Division not to be excluded or modified
74L. Limitation in certain circumstances of liability of manufacturer to seller
74M. The effect of Part VIB on this Division

Division 3--Miscellaneous

75. Saving of other laws and remedies
75A. Rescission of contracts

PART VA--LIABILITY OF MANUFACTURERS AND IMPORTERS FOR DEFECTIVE GOODS

75AA. Interpretation
75AB. Certain interpretation provisions (importers and others taken to be manufacturers etc.) apply to this Part
75AC. Meaning of goods having defect
75AD. Liability for defective goods causing injuries--loss by injured individual
75AE. Liability for defective goods causing injuries--loss by person other than injured individual
75AF. Liability for defective goods--loss relating to other goods
75AG. Liability for defective goods--loss relating to buildings etc.
75AH. Survival of liability actions
75AI. No liability action where workers' compensation or law giving effect to an international agreement applies
75AJ. Unidentified manufacturer
75AK. Defences
75AL. Commonwealth liability for goods that are defective only because of compliance with Commonwealth mandatory standard
75AM. Liability joint and several
75AN. Contributory acts or omissions to reduce compensation
75AO. Time for commencing actions
75AP. Application of provisions not to be excluded or modified
75AQ. Representative actions by the Commission
75AR. Saving of other laws and remedies
75AS. Jurisdiction of courts

PART VC--OFFENCES

Division 1--Application of Part

75AZA. Part does not apply to financial services
75AZAA. Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws

Division 2--Offences relating to unfair practices

75AZB. Interpretation
75AZC. False or misleading representations
75AZD. False representations and other misleading or offensive conduct in relation to land
75AZE. Misleading conduct in relation to employment
75AZF. Single price to be stated in certain circumstances
75AZG. Offering gifts and prizes
75AZH. Misleading conduct to which Industrial Property Convention applies
75AZI. Certain misleading conduct in relation to services
75AZJ. Bait advertising
75AZK. Referral selling
75AZL. Accepting payment without intending or being able to supply as ordered
75AZM. Misleading representations about certain business activities
75AZN. Harassment and coercion
75AZO. Pyramid selling
75AZP. Unsolicited credit and debit cards
75AZQ. Assertion of right to payment for unsolicited goods or services or for making an entry in a directory
75AZR. Application of provisions of Division to prescribed information providers

Division 3--Offences relating to product safety and product information

75AZS. Product safety standards and unsafe goods
75AZT. Product information standards
75AZU. Compliance with product recall notice

PART VI--ENFORCEMENT AND REMEDIES

75B. Interpretation
76. Pecuniary penalties
76A. Defence to proceedings under section 76 relating to a contravention of section 95AZN
76B. What happens if substantially the same conduct is a contravention of Part IV or section 95AZN and an offence?
76C. Defence to proceedings relating to exclusionary provisions
77. Civil action for recovery of pecuniary penalties
77A. Indemnification of officers
77B. Certain indemnities not authorised and certain documents void
77C. Application of section 77A to a person other than a body corporate
78. Criminal proceedings not to be brought for contraventions of Part IV or V
79. Offences against section 44ZZRF or 44ZZRG or Part VC etc.
79A. Enforcement and recovery of certain fines
79B. Preference must be given to compensation for victims
80. Injunctions
80AB. Stay of injunctions
80AC. Injunctions to prevent mergers if clearance or authorisation granted on the basis of false or misleading information
81. Divestiture where merger contravenes section 50 or 50A
81A. Divestiture where merger done under clearance or authorisation granted on false etc. information
82. Actions for damages
83. Finding in proceedings to be evidence
84. Conduct by directors, employees or agents
85. Defences
86. Jurisdiction of courts
86AA. Limit on jurisdiction of Federal Magistrates Court
86A. Transfer of matters
86B. Transfer of certain proceedings to Family Court
86C. Non-punitive orders
86D. Punitive orders--adverse publicity
86E. Order disqualifying a person from managing corporations
86F. Privilege against exposure to penalty--disqualification from managing corporations
87. Other orders
87A. Power of Court to prohibit payment or transfer of moneys or other property
87AA. Special provision relating to Court's exercise of powers under this Part in relation to boycott conduct
87AB. Limit on liability for misleading or deceptive conduct
87B. Enforcement of undertakings
87C. Enforcement of undertakings--Secretary to the Department
87CA. Intervention by Commission
87CAA. The effect of Part VIB on this Part

PART VIA--PROPORTIONATE LIABILITY FOR MISLEADING AND DECEPTIVE CONDUCT

87CB. Application of Part
87CC. Certain concurrent wrongdoers not to have benefit of apportionment
87CD. Proportionate liability for apportionable claims
87CE. Defendant to notify plaintiff of concurrent wrongdoer of whom defendant aware
87CF. Contribution not recoverable from defendant
87CG. Subsequent actions
87CH. Joining non-party concurrent wrongdoer in the action
87CI. Application of Part

PART VIB--CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OR COMPENSATION FOR DEATH OR PERSONAL INJURY

Division 1--Introduction

87D. Definitions
87E. Proceedings to which this Part applies

Division 2--Limitation periods

87F. Basic rule
87G. Date of discoverability
87H. Long-stop period
87J. The effect of minority or incapacity
87K. The effect of close relationships

Division 3--Limits on personal injury damages for non-economic loss

87L. Limits on damages for non-economic loss
87M. Maximum amount of damages for non-economic loss
87N. Index numbers
87P. Most extreme cases
87Q. Cases of 33% or more (but not 100%) of a most extreme case
87R. Cases of 15% or more (but less than 33%) of a most extreme case
87S. Cases of less than 15% of a most extreme case
87T. Referring to earlier decisions on non-economic loss

Division 4--Limits on personal injury damages for loss of earning capacity

87U. Personal injury damages for loss of earning capacity
87V. Average weekly earnings

Division 5--Limits on personal injury damages for gratuitous attendant care services

87W. Personal injury damages for gratuitous attendant care services for plaintiff
87X. Personal injury damages for loss of plaintiff's capacity to provide gratuitous attendant care services

Division 6--Other limits on personal injury damages

87Y. Damages for future economic loss--discount rate
87Z. Damages for loss of superannuation entitlements
87ZA. Interest on damages
87ZB. Exemplary and aggravated damages

Division 7--Structured settlements

87ZC. Court may make orders under section 87 for structured settlements

PART VII--AUTHORISATIONS, NOTIFICATIONS AND CLEARANCES IN RESPECT OF RESTRICTIVE TRADE PRACTICES

Division 1--Authorisations

87ZD. Definitions
88. Power of Commission to grant authorisations
89. Procedure for applications and the keeping of a register
90. Determination of applications for authorisations
90A. Commission to afford opportunity for conference before determining application for authorisation
90B. Commission may rely on consultations undertaken by the AEMC
91. Grant and variation of authorisations
91A. Minor variations of authorizations
91B. Revocation of an authorization
91C. Revocation of an authorization and substitution of a replacement

Division 2--Notifications

Subdivision A--Exclusive dealing

93. Notification of exclusive dealing

Subdivision B--Collective bargaining

93AA. Definitions
93AB. Notification of collective bargaining
93AC. Commission's objection notice
93AD. When collective bargaining notice comes into force and ceases to be in force
93AE. Withdrawal of collective bargaining notice
93AEA. Only 1 collective bargaining notice under subsection 93AB(1A) may be given
93AF. Only 1 collective bargaining notice under subsection 93AB(1) may be given

Subdivision C--Conferences

93A. Commission to afford opportunity for conference before giving notice

Subdivision D--Register of notifications

95. Register of notifications

Division 3--Merger clearances and authorisations

Subdivision A--Preliminary

95AA. Simplified outline of this Division
95AB. Definitions

Subdivision B--Merger clearances

95AC. Commission may grant clearance for a merger
95AD. Application for clearance
95AE. Requirements for valid clearance application
95AF. Commission to notify if clearance application is invalid
95AG. Application to be published on the Internet
95AH. Merger clearance register
95AI. Confidentiality claims etc.
95AJ. Commission may seek additional information from applicant
95AK. Commission may seek further information and consult others
95AL. Applicant may withdraw application
95AM. Commission to make determination on application
95AN. When clearance must not be granted
95AO. Time limits for determining application
95AP. Clearance subject to conditions
95AQ. When clearance is in force
95AR. Minor variations of clearances
95AS. Revocation of clearance or revocation of clearance and substitution of a new clearance

Subdivision C--Merger authorisations

95AT. Tribunal may grant authorisation for a merger
95AU. Application for authorisation
95AV. Requirements for valid authorisation application
95AW. Tribunal to notify if authorisation application is invalid
95AX. Tribunal to notify Commission of authorisation application
95AY. Application to be published on the Internet
95AZ. Merger authorisation register
95AZA. Confidentiality claims etc.
95AZC. Tribunal may seek additional information from applicant
95AZD. Tribunal may seek further information and consult others etc.
95AZE. Applicant may withdraw application
95AZEA. Tribunal must require Commission to give report
95AZF. Commission to assist Tribunal
95AZFA. Commission may make enquiries
95AZG. Tribunal to make determination on application
95AZH. When authorisation must not be granted
95AZI. Time limits for determining application
95AZJ. Authorisation subject to conditions
95AZK. When authorisation is in force
95AZL. Minor variations of authorisations
95AZM. Revocation of authorisation or revocation of authorisation and substitution of a new authorisation

Subdivision D--Miscellaneous

95AZN. Providing false or misleading information

PART VIIA--PRICES SURVEILLANCE

Division 1--Preliminary

95A. Interpretation
95B. Exempt supplies
95C. Application of Part
95D. Crown to be bound
95E. Object of this Part
95F. Simplified overview of this Part

Division 2--Commission's functions under this Part

95G. Commission's functions under this Part

Division 3--Price inquiries

Subdivision A--Holding of inquiries

95H. Price inquiries
95J. Content of inquiry notices
95K. Period for completing inquiry
95L. Notice of holding of inquiry
95M. Notice of extension of period for completing inquiry
95N. Price restrictions

Subdivision B--Reports on inquiries

95P. Copies of report to be made available
95Q. Notification of proposed prices after receipt of report

Subdivision C--Procedure at inquiries

95R. Public inquiries etc.
95S. Taking of evidence on oath or affirmation
95T. Failure of witness to attend
95U. Refusal to be sworn or to answer question
95V. Protection of witnesses
95W. Allowances to witnesses

Division 4--Price notifications

95X. Declarations by Minister or Commission
95Y. Declarations in relation to State or Territory authorities
95Z. Price restrictions
95ZA. Later notices modifying a locality notice
95ZB. Applicable period in relation to a locality notice
95ZC. Register of price notifications
95ZD. Delegation by Commission

Division 5--Price monitoring

95ZE. Directions to monitor prices, costs and profits of an industry
95ZF. Directions to monitor prices, costs and profits of a business
95ZG. Exceptions to price monitoring

Division 6--Other provisions

95ZH. Ministerial directions
95ZI. Inquiries by an unincorporated body or a group of 2 or more individuals
95ZJ. Withdrawal of notices
95ZK. Power to obtain information or documents
95ZL. Inspection of documents etc.
95ZM. Retention of documents
95ZN. Confidential information
95ZO. Immunity
95ZP. Secrecy: members or staff members of the Commission etc.
95ZQ. Secrecy: persons involved in inquiries by bodies other than the Commission

PART VIII--RESALE PRICE MAINTENANCE

96. Acts constituting engaging in resale price maintenance
96A. Resale price maintenance in relation to services
97. Recommended prices
98. Withholding the supply of goods
99. Statements as to the minimum price of goods
100. Evidentiary provisions

PART IX--REVIEW BY TRIBUNAL OF DETERMINATIONS OF COMMISSION

Division 1--Applications for review

101. Applications for review
101A. Application for review of notice under subsection 93(3) or (3A) or 93AC(1) or (2)
102. Functions and powers of Tribunal

Division 2--Procedure and Evidence

102A. Definition
103. Procedure generally
104. Regulations as to certain matters
105. Power to take evidence on oath
106. Hearings to be in public except in special circumstances
107. Evidence in form of written statement
108. Taking of evidence by single member
109. Participants in proceedings before Tribunal
110. Representation

Division 3--Review of Commission's determinations on merger clearances

111. Applications for review
112. Tribunal to notify Commission
113. Commission to give material to Tribunal
114. Tribunal may consult etc. to clarify information
115. Commission to assist Tribunal
116. Tribunal only to consider material before the Commission
117. Tribunal to make decision on review
118. Time limits for making review decision
119. Tribunal's decision taken to be Commission's

PART X--INTERNATIONAL LINER CARGO SHIPPING

Division 1--Preliminary
10.01 Objects of Part
10.01A Simplified outline
10.02 Interpretation
10.02A Inland terminals
10.03 Designated shipper bodies

Division 2--Additional restrictive trade practice provisions applying to ocean carriers
10.04 Application of section 46 in relation to conference agreements

Division 3--Minimum standards for conference agreements
10.06 Application of Australian law to outwards conference agreements and withdrawal from agreements
10.07 Minimum levels of shipping services to be specified in conference agreements
10.08 Conference agreements may include only certain restrictive trade practice provisions
10.09 Where may consequences of conference agreements not complying with minimum standards be found?

Division 4--Registers and files and public inspection of them
10.10 Registers and conference agreement files open to public inspection
10.11 What registers are to be kept by the Registrar?
10.12 What conference agreement files are to be kept by the Registrar?
10.13 What register is to be kept by the Commission?

Division 5--Exemptions from certain restrictive trade practice prohibitions

Subdivision A--Exemptions relating to conference agreements
10.14 Exemptions apply only to certain activities
10.15 When do exemptions commence to apply in relation to registered conference agreements?
10.16 Exemptions do not apply to variations of conference agreement unless varying agreement registered
10.17 Exemptions from sections 44ZZRF, 44ZZRG, 44ZZRJ, 44ZZRK and 45
10.17A Exemptions from sections 44ZZRF, 44ZZRG, 44ZZRJ, 44ZZRK and 45 for freight rate agreements
10.18 Exemption from section 47
10.18A Exemptions from section 47 for freight rate agreements

Subdivision B--Exemptions relating to loyalty agreements
10.19 Exemptions from sections 44ZZRF, 44ZZRG, 44ZZRJ, 44ZZRK and 45
10.20 Exemption from section 47
10.21 Exemptions cease to apply in relation to a shipper at the shipper's option

Subdivision D--Other exemptions
10.24 Exemptions from sections 44ZZRF, 44ZZRG, 44ZZRJ, 44ZZRK, 45 and 47 in relation to certain negotiations
10.24A Exemptions from sections 44ZZRF, 44ZZRG, 44ZZRJ, 44ZZRK, 45 and 47 in relation to stevedoring contracts

Division 6--Registration of conference agreements

Subdivision A--Provisional registration
10.25 Application for provisional registration of conference agreement
10.26 How application is to be made and verified
10.27 Copy of agreement to be filed with application etc.
10.27A Copy of conference agreement to be given to designated peak shipper body
10.28 Decision on application for provisional registration
10.29 Parties to conference agreement to negotiate minimum level of shipping services after provisional registration of agreement

Subdivision B--Final registration
10.30 Application for final registration of conference agreement
10.31 How application is to be made and verified
10.32 Copy of agreement to be filed with application etc.
10.33 Decision on application for final registration

Subdivision C--Confidentiality requests
10.34 Request for confidentiality
10.35 Abstract to accompany request for confidentiality
10.36 Examination of abstract
10.37 Decision on request for confidentiality
10.38 Application for registration to be returned where request for confidentiality refused etc.

Subdivision D--Miscellaneous
10.39 Application also to be made for registration of varying conference agreements
10.40 Notification of happening of affecting events prior to final registration etc.

Division 7--Obligations of ocean carriers in relation to registered conference agreements
10.41 Parties to registered conference agreement to negotiate with certain designated shipper bodies etc.
10.42 Application to be made for registration of varying conference agreements
10.43 Parties to registered conference agreement to notify happening of affecting events etc.

Division 8--Powers of Minister in relation to registered conference agreements
10.44 Powers exercisable by Minister in relation to registered conference agreements etc.
10.45 Circumstances in which Minister may exercise powers in relation to registered conference agreements
10.46 Action to be taken where powers exercised by Minister without first obtaining Commission report
10.47 Investigation and report by Commission on reference by Minister
10.48 Investigation and report by Commission on own initiative or on application by affected person
10.49 Undertakings by parties to registered conference agreement
10.49A Enforcement of undertakings

Division 9--Obligations of non-conference ocean carriers with substantial market power
10.50 Investigations by Commission into market power of ocean carriers
10.51 Determination by Minister of market power of ocean carriers
10.52 Non-conference ocean carrier with substantial market power to negotiate with certain designated shipper bodies etc.
10.53 Non-conference ocean carrier with substantial market power not to hinder Australian flag shipping operators etc.

Division 10--Powers of Minister in relation to non-conference ocean carriers with substantial market power
10.54 Powers exercisable by Minister in relation to obligations of non-conference ocean carriers with substantial market power
10.55 Circumstances in which Minister may exercise powers
10.56 Action to be taken where powers exercised by Minister without first obtaining Commission report
10.57 Investigation and report by Commission on reference by Minister
10.58 Investigation and report by Commission on application by affected person
10.59 Undertakings by ocean carrier
10.60 Enforcement of orders and undertakings

Division 11--Unfair pricing practices
10.61 Powers exercisable by Minister in relation to pricing practices etc.
10.62 Circumstances in which Minister may exercise powers
10.63 Investigation and report by Commission
10.64 Undertakings not to engage in pricing practices
10.65 Enforcement of orders and undertakings
10.66 Determination of normal freight rates for shipping services
10.67 Determination of whether practice contrary to national interest

Division 12--Registration of ocean carrier agents
10.68 Ocean carrier who provides international liner cargo shipping services to have registered agent
10.69 Representation of ocean carrier by registered agent
10.70 Application by ocean carrier for registration of agent
10.71 Registration of agent
10.72 Change of agent etc.

Division 12A--Exemption orders for inwards conference agreements etc
10.72A Exemption orders for inwards conference agreements etc.
10.72B Criteria for making exemption order
10.72C Duration of exemption order may be limited
10.72D Conditions of exemption order

Division 13--General provisions relating to registers and conference agreement files
10.73 Form of registers and conference agreement files
10.74 Deletion of entries wrongly existing in certain registers
10.75 Deletion of obsolete entries in certain registers
10.76 Correction of clerical errors and other mistakes in certain registers etc.

Division 14--Administration
10.77 Registrar of Liner Shipping
10.78 Appointment of Registrar etc.
10.79 Acting Registrar
10.80 Registrar and staff to be public servants
10.81 Delegation by Minister
10.82 Delegation by Registrar

Division 14A--Review of decisions of Commission
10.82A Review by Tribunal
10.82B Functions and powers of Tribunal
10.82C Provisions that do not apply in relation to a Tribunal review

Division 14B--Review of decisions of Minister
10.82D Review by Tribunal
10.82E Functions and powers of Tribunal
10.82F Modifying register after Tribunal review

Subdivision A--of Division 5 applies in relation to the conference agreement concerned to the extent to which that Subdivision would have applied but for the entry of the particulars of the direction.
10.82G Provisions that do not apply in relation to a Tribunal review

Division 15--Miscellaneous
10.83 Act not to affect rights under Freedom of Information Act
10.84 Review of decisions of Registrar
10.85 Statement to accompany notices of Registrar
10.86 Evidence
10.87 Notification by Commission of references etc.
10.88 Exclusion of documents etc. from register of Commission investigations
10.89 Disclosure of confidential information
10.90 Fees
10.91 Application of Part XID and section 155 to investigations under Part

PART XIA--THE COMPETITION CODE

150A. Definitions
150B. Objects of this Part
150C. The Competition Code
150D. Federal Court may exercise jurisdiction under application laws of Territories
150E. Exercise of jurisdiction under cross-vesting provisions
150F. Commonwealth consent to conferral of functions etc. on Commonwealth entities
150FA. How duty is imposed
150FB. When an application law imposes a duty
150G. Application laws may operate concurrently with this Act
150H. No doubling-up of liabilities
150I. References in instruments to the Competition Code
150J. Authorisations etc. under this Act may relate also to Competition Code
150K. Gazettal of jurisdictions that excessively modify the Code

PART XIB--THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY

Division 1--Introduction

151AA. Simplified outline
151AB. Definitions
151AC. Extension to external Territories
151AD. Continuity of partnerships
151AE. Additional operation of Part
151AF. Telecommunications market
151AG. When a body corporate is related to a partnership
151AH. Degree of power in a telecommunications market
151AI. Interpretation of Part IV or VII not affected by this Part

Division 2--Anti-competitive conduct

151AJ. Anti-competitive conduct
151AK. The competition rule

Division 3--Competition notices and exemption orders

Subdivision A--Competition notices

151AKA. Part A competition notices
151AL. Part B competition notices
151AM. Competition notice to be given to carrier or carriage service provider
151AN. Evidentiary effect of competition notice
151AO. Duration of Part A competition notice
151AOA. Variation of competition notice
151AOB. Revocation of competition notice
151AP. Guidelines
151AQ. Commission to act expeditiously
151AQA. Stay of proceedings relating to competition notices
151AQB. Advisory notices
151AR. Register of competition notices

Subdivision B--Exemption orders

151AS. Exemption orders
151AT. Form of application
151AU. Further information
151AV. Withdrawal of application
151AW. Commission must publicise receipt of applications
151AX. Commission may refuse to consider application if it relates to the same conduct as an authorisation application
151AY. Commission may refuse to consider application if it relates to the same conduct as a Part VII notification
151AZ. Commission may convene conference to discuss application
151BA. Commission must grant or reject application
151BB. Commission to give opportunity for submissions
151BC. Criteria for making exemption order
151BD. Notification of decision
151BE. Duration of exemption order may be limited
151BF. Conditions of exemption order
151BG. Revocation of exemption order
151BH. Register of exemption orders

Subdivision C--Miscellaneous

151BJ. Conduct includes proposed conduct

Division 4--Tariff filing

151BK. Tariff filing directions
151BL. Specification of goods and services
151BM. Notification of reasons
151BN. Duration of direction may be limited
151BO. Revocation of direction
151BP. Variation of direction
151BQ. Public access to tariff information
151BR. Register of tariff filing directions
151BT. Meaning of terms and conditions

Division 5--Tariff filing by Telstra

151BTA. Tariff filing by Telstra

Division 6--Record-keeping rules and disclosure directions

151BU. Commission may make record-keeping rules
151BUAA.Minister may give directions to Commission
151BUAAA.Minister to give direction to Commission about Telstra's wholesale operations and retail operations
151BUAB.Request for disclosure
151BUA. Commission gives access to reports
151BUB. Carrier or carriage service provider gives access to reports
151BUC. Carrier or carriage service provider gives access to periodic reports
151BUD. Exemption of reports from access requirements
151BUDA.Commission gives access to Ministerially-directed reports
151BUDB.Carrier or carriage service provider gives access to Ministerially-directed reports
151BUDC.Carrier or carriage service provider gives access to Ministerially-directed periodic reports
151BUE. Access via the Internet
151BUF. Self-incrimination
151BV. Incorrect records

Division 7--Enforcement of the competition rule, tariff filing directions, record-keeping rules and disclosure directions

151BW. Person involved in a contravention of the competition rule, a tariff filing direction, a record-keeping rule or a disclosure direction
151BX. Pecuniary penalties for breach of the competition rule, a tariff filing direction, a record-keeping rule or a disclosure direction
151BY. Civil action for recovery of pecuniary penalties
151BZ. Criminal proceedings not to be brought for contraventions of the competition rule, tariff filing directions , record-keeping rules or disclosure directions
151CA. Injunctions
151CB. Orders to disclose information or publish an advertisement--breach of the competition rule
151CC. Actions for damages--breach of the competition rule
151CD. Finding of fact in proceedings to be evidence
151CE. Other orders--compensation for breach of the competition rule
151CF. Conduct by directors, employees or agents

Division 8--Disclosure of documents by Commission

151CG. Disclosure of documents by Commission

Division 9--Treatment of partnerships

151CH. Treatment of partnerships

Division 10--Review of decisions

151CI. Review by Tribunal
151CJ. Functions and powers of Tribunal
151CK. Provisions that do not apply in relation to a Tribunal review

Division 11--Reviews of competitive safeguards within the telecommunications industry

151CL. Reviews of competitive safeguards within the telecommunications industry

Division 12--Monitoring of telecommunications charges paid by consumers

151CM. Monitoring of telecommunications charges paid by consumers

Division 12A--Reports about competition in the telecommunications industry

151CMA. Public reports about competition in the telecommunications industry
151CMB. Confidential reports about competition in the telecommunications industry
151CMC. Examples of matters that may be specified in a determination under section 151CMA or 151CMB

Division 13--Review of operation of this Part

151CN. Review of operation of this Part

Division 14--Operational separation for Telstra

151CP. Operational separation for Telstra

PART XIC--TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACCESS REGIME

Division 1--Introduction

152AA. Simplified outline
152AB. Object of this Part
152AC. Definitions
152AD. This Part binds the Crown
152AE. Extension to external Territories
152AF. Access
152AG. Access seeker
152AH. Reasonableness--terms and conditions
152AJ. Interpretation of Part IIIA not affected by this Part
152AK. Operation of Parts IV and VII not affected by this Part

Division 2--Declared services

152AL. Declared services
152ALA. Duration of declaration
152AM. Inquiries about proposals to declare services
152AN. Combined inquiries about proposals to declare services
152AO. Variation or revocation of declaration
152AQ. Register of declared services
152AQA. Pricing principles
152AQB. Model terms and conditions relating to access to core services
152AQC. Compensation for acquisition of property

Division 3--Standard access obligations

152AR. Standard access obligations
152AS. Ordinary class exemptions from standard access obligations
152ASA. Anticipatory class exemptions from standard access obligations
152AT. Ordinary individual exemptions from standard access obligations
152ATA. Anticipatory individual exemptions from standard access obligations
152AU. Individual exemptions--request for further information
152AV. Review by Tribunal of exemption order decision
152AW. Functions and powers of Tribunal
152AX. Provisions that do not apply in relation to a Tribunal review
152AXA. Statement of reasons for reviewable decision--specification of documents
152AY. Compliance with standard access obligations
152AYA. Ancillary obligations--confidential information
152AZ. Carrier licence condition
152BA. Service provider rule
152BB. Judicial enforcement of standard access obligations
152BBAA.Judicial enforcement of conditions and limitations of exemption determinations and orders
152BBA. Commission may give directions in relation to negotiations
152BBB. Enforcement of directions
152BBC. Commission's role in negotiations
152BBD. Reaching agreement on terms and conditions of access

Division 4--Telecommunications access code

152BJ. Telecommunications access code
152BK. Content of telecommunications access code
152BL. Commission must invite public submissions on telecommunications access code
152BM. Commission must consult the ACMA about code
152BN. Copy of code to be given to the ACMA
152BR. Register of telecommunications access codes

Division 5--Access undertakings

Subdivision A--Ordinary access undertakings

152BS. What is an ordinary access undertaking?
152BT. Further information about undertaking
152BU. Commission to accept or reject access undertaking
152BV. Acceptance of access undertaking--model terms and conditions in access code not adopted
152BW. Acceptance of access undertaking--model terms and conditions in access code adopted
152BX. Duration of access undertaking
152BY. Variation of access undertakings
152BZ. Further information about variation of access undertaking
152CA. Voluntary withdrawal of undertaking
152CB. Replacement of access undertaking

Subdivision B--Special access undertakings

152CBA. What is a special access undertaking?
152CBB. Further information about undertaking
152CBC. Commission to accept or reject access undertaking
152CBD. Criteria for accepting access undertaking
152CBE. Extension of access undertaking
152CBF. Duration of access undertaking
152CBG. Variation of access undertakings
152CBH. Further information about variation of access undertaking
152CBI. Voluntary withdrawal of undertaking
152CBJ. Proposed service

Subdivision C--General provisions

152CC. Register of access undertakings
152CD. Enforcement of access undertakings
152CDA. Deferral of consideration of an access undertaking etc.
152CE. Review by Tribunal
152CF. Functions and powers of Tribunal
152CG. Provisions that do not apply in relation to a Tribunal review
152CGA. Statement of reasons for reviewable decision--specification of documents
152CGB. Access undertakings prevail over inconsistent arbitral determinations

Division 6--Ministerial pricing determinations

152CH. Ministerial pricing determinations
152CI. Undertakings and codes that are inconsistent with Ministerial pricing determinations
152CJ. Register of Ministerial pricing determinations

Division 7--Relationship between this Part and Part IIIA

152CK. Relationship between this Part and Part IIIA

Division 8--Resolution of disputes about access

Subdivision A--Introduction

152CL. Definitions
152CLA. Resolution of access disputes

Subdivision B--Notification of access disputes

152CM. Notification of access disputes
152CN. Withdrawal of notifications

Subdivision C--Arbitration of access disputes

152CO. Parties to the arbitration
152CP. Determination by Commission
152CPA. Interim determination by Commission
152CQ. Restrictions on access determinations
152CR. Matters that the Commission must take into account
152CRA. Publication of determinations
152CS. Commission may terminate arbitration in certain cases
152CT. Commission may give directions in relation to negotiations
152CU. Enforcement of directions

Subdivision D--Procedure in arbitrations

152CV. Constitution of Commission for conduct of arbitration
152CW. Member of the Commission presiding at an arbitration
152CWA. Exercise of procedural powers by Commission members
152CX. Reconstitution of Commission
152CY. Determination of questions
152CZ. Hearing to be in private
152DA. Right to representation
152DB. Procedure of Commission
152DBA. Using information from one arbitration in another arbitration
152DC. Particular powers of Commission
152DD. Power to take evidence on oath or affirmation
152DE. Failing to attend as a witness
152DF. Failing to answer questions etc.
152DG. Giving false or misleading evidence
152DH. Provision of false or misleading document
152DI. Intimidation etc.
152DJ. Disturbing an arbitration hearing etc.
152DK. Party may request Commission to treat material as confidential
152DL. Sections 18 and 19 do not apply to the Commission in an arbitration
152DM. Parties to pay costs of an arbitration
152DMA. Joint arbitration hearings

Subdivision E--Effect of determinations

152DN. Operation of determinations
152DNA. Backdating of final determinations
152DNB. Stay of determinations
152DNC. Continuity of final determination not affected by expiry of declaration relating to declared service

Subdivision G--Variation of determinations

152DT. Variation of determinations

Subdivision H--Enforcement of determinations

152DU. Enforcement of determinations
152DV. Consent injunctions
152DW. Interim injunctions
152DX. Factors relevant to granting a restraining injunction
152DY. Factors relevant to granting a mandatory injunction
152DZ. Discharge or variation of injunction or other order

Subdivision I--Miscellaneous

152EA. Register of determinations
152EAA. Commission's powers under Division 6 of Part XIB not limited
152EB. Compensation for acquisition of property

Division 9--Registered agreements for access to declared services

152EC. Agreements to which this Division applies
152ED. Registration of agreement
152EE. Effect of registration of agreement

Division 10--Hindering the fulfilment of a standard access obligation etc

152EF. Prohibition on hindering the fulfilment of a standard access obligation etc.
152EG. Enforcement of prohibition on hindering the fulfilment of a standard access obligation etc.
152EH. Consent injunctions
152EI. Interim injunctions
152EJ. Factors relevant to granting a restraining injunction
152EK. Factors relevant to granting a mandatory injunction
152EL. Discharge or variation of injunction or other order

Division 10A--Procedural Rules

152ELA. Procedural Rules
152ELB. Public consultation
152ELC. Plan for the development of Procedural Rules

Division 11--Miscellaneous

152EM. Continuity of partnerships
152EN. Treatment of partnerships
152EO. Conduct by directors, servants or agents
152EP. Regulations about fees for inspection etc. of registers
152EQ. Operational separation for Telstra

PART XID--SEARCH AND SEIZURE

Division 1--Preliminary

154. Simplified outline
154A. Definitions

Division 2--Appointment of inspectors and identity cards

154B. Appointment of inspectors
154C. Identity cards

Division 3--Entry to premises with consent

154D. Entry with consent
154E. Powers in relation to premises
154F. Operation of electronic equipment at premises

Division 4--Entry to premises under a search warrant

Subdivision A--Powers available under a search warrant

154G. The things that are authorised by a search warrant
154GA. Removing things for examination or processing
154H. Operation of electronic equipment at premises
154J. Securing electronic equipment for use by experts

Subdivision B--Availability of assistance and use of force in executing a search warrant

154K. Authorisation of officers assisting
154L. Availability of assistance and use of force in executing a search warrant

Subdivision C--Obligations of executing officer and officers assisting

154M. Announcement before entry
154N. Details of warrant to be given to occupier

Subdivision D--Occupier's rights and responsibilities

154P. Occupier entitled to observe search being conducted
154Q. Occupier to provide reasonable facilities and assistance
154R. Answering of questions or producing evidential material
154RA. Person with computer knowledge to assist access etc.

Subdivision E--General provisions relating to seizure

154S. Copies of seized things to be provided
154T. Receipts for things seized or moved under warrant
154U. Return of seized things
154V. Magistrate may permit a thing to be retained
154W. Disposal of things if there is no owner or owner cannot be located

Subdivision F--Search warrants

154X. Issue of search warrants
154Y. Search warrants by telephone, fax etc.
154Z. Offences relating to warrants

Subdivision G--Powers of magistrates

154ZA. Powers conferred on magistrates

Division 5--General provisions relating to electronic equipment

154ZB. Operation of electronic equipment at premises
154ZC. Compensation for damage to electronic equipment

PART XII--MISCELLANEOUS

155. Power to obtain information, documents and evidence
155AAA. Protection of certain information
155AA. Protection of Part VB information
155A. Power to obtain information and documents in New Zealand relating to trans-Tasman markets
155B. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission may receive information and documents on behalf of New Zealand Commerce Commission
156. Inspection of documents by Commission
157. Disclosure of documents by Commission
157AA. Disclosure of documents by Tribunal in relation to merger authorisations
157A. Disclosure of information by Commission
157B. Disclosure of protected cartel information to a court or tribunal
157C. Disclosure of protected cartel information to a party to court proceedings etc.
157D. General powers of a court
158. Protection of members of Tribunal, counsel and witnesses
159. Incriminating answers
160. Failure of witness to attend
161. Refusal to be sworn or to answer questions
162. Contempt
162A. Intimidation etc.
163. Prosecutions
163A. Declarations and orders
165. Inspection of, furnishing of copies of, and evidence of, documents
166. Certificates as to furnishing of particulars to Commission
167. Judicial notice
170. Legal and financial assistance
171. Annual report by Commission
171A. Charges by the Commission
171B. Division 3 of Part IIIA and Division 8 of Part XIC do not confer judicial power on the Commission
172. Regulations
173. Authorisation for the purposes of subsection 51(1)

PART XIII--APPLICATION AND TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE COMPETITION PROVISIONS

Division 1--Cartel conduct

174. Definitions
175. Giving effect after the commencement time to a cartel provision in existence before that time
176. Proceedings relating to price-fixing contraventions taking place before the commencement time
177. Authorisations in force before the commencement time
178. Notifications in force before the commencement time
SCHEDULE The Schedule version of Part IV

________________________________________

[Index] [Table] [Search] [Search this Act] [Notes] [Noteup] [Download] [Help]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi Arthur,

Try challenging the department's ability to make judicial judgments. I recall reading somewhere (sorry, can't remember where) that an action to suspend a licence is the prerogative of the courts, and government departments can not usurp the power of the courts. (of course, they do, regularly, probably because the uninformed don't know any better).

Also I recall reading an article about the I.R.S.who go into court as the sovereign and by that action, own the court, and therefore make the law, to wit, "the defendant failed to submit a tax return as required". At that point that IS the law, however, my comprehension is that if the (then) defendant challenges (counter sues) the I.R.S. on the basis of jurisdiction, the I.R.S. becomes the counter defendant and loses it's sovereignty because a corporation cannot be a sovereign it subsequently cannot make law, as such "the defendant failed to lodge a tax return" ceases to be the law..........no case to answer.

Quite obviously you would need to do some research to verify that, but my comprehension is that it has been used quite successfully on more that one occasion.

Best I can offer,

Have faith, and believe.

Rob.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Family First

I too have had dealings with our so-called legal system over the past months, there is simply nothing we can do, they ignore us and the courts as well as the pollies and all else are corrupt. I tried getting info from solicitors...blank, I tried the Institute of Solicitors ???ISC I think. They said it was legal for a solicitor to quote you a price in writing then double it without a sale even proceeding, amazing. I had another case where the accuser took us to court ( we stupidly did not defend on BAD advise) then learning that he was double dipping, (took the real perpetrator to court first then when only received some payment (???don;t know how much) took us and got a double payment. I took it all to the Ombudsman and he said ok nothing they could do...It is amazing and now I have experienced it first hand. Nothing left to take these wrongs to. So, I realised that we have to have someone we can trust in the parliament no other way, so sent out the below letter to many and ????? are they too asleep to spend $25.00 to join. God knows but to me this is a chance. Anyway, you and others may as well forget any justice until we have a representative in the parliament with a VOICE and that voice becomes louder with SUPPORT FROM US. Look at the ETS and in impact that thousands of emails did.

Pauline

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Try using Magna Carta, taking away a mans tools for making a living.

Bob

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi,

Maybe Mark might be able to give you some advice on your dilemma Fiona.

Regards,

Leonce Kealy
6 Eskdale Street
Edens Landing, Queensland
AUSTRALIA 4207
Email: eireuklk @ bigpond.com
Ph: 61 7 38073827
Fx: 61 7 38073815
Cell: 0419643489

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DEAR ARTHUR,

I propose that we develop an electronic Newsletter, on a number of issues, displaying clearly how our Governments behave - i.e. act as reverse Robin Hoods!

pinky

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi Arthur, in relation to the SDRO I have just received a letter from them which I have attached but it sent to you on NOT FOR PUBLICATION basis and it is only to show you that they not always win. I have another fine in relation to a red light camara which is being review as I have elected to go to Court but they say it will take weeks and uplifted the suspension on my license. So as you can see the corrupt forces do not and cannot control everything and when they know they will get a real fight they can only prevent you from going to court. As the song said you must have faith and I mean in the great creator and yourself .

Say hello to the kids and Fiona .

Regards
Palfaro

-------------

This was over an electoral issue....

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi Arthur,

Well, yesterday I approached 3 Policy Enforcers at a local shopping center that were handing out paper police cars to the kids..

When asked if my sonI said, sorry we don't support Policy Enforcers, which by the way you all are, the ones that force the policy of a private corporation upon people like myself.

We went into a long conversation about licencing and registration, and they admitted to only be acting in criminal law, not statute or common law, which I thought was strange..

So I asked them what the big deal was, and it came down to their argument being about, you guessed it..liability.

They claim that when (speculative fantasy scenario) I crash my car and end up in hospital in a coma that taxpayers dollars will be paying for it.

I lectured them on self responsibility, and then dropped this on them..

"So, Officer, by your standards and definitions of how you operate, which is basically turning my unalienable rights into a criminal activity, if I were to follow your reasoning, I could harass, threaten, physically assault, detain and charge you, if you were walking through a shopping centre, because there is the chance that you might steal something..."

That is pure speculation and fantasy, and what you are doing is acting unlawfully by making a crime out of something that has not happened...without any injured party..

I went on to state very clearly and plainly to them that there is no-one on this planet that could ever force me to wear a bike helmet at age 42, when I grew up without one, and they were shocked...

They didn't want to talk any more, but I brought up the Statute of Monopolies and the fact that the Registrations office was operating a monopoly, and therefore is invalid.

It was suggested I speak to a local MP...so I did..

After an hour of debate, her best claim was that there were only a very few people like myself who desire to be free, and the rest (apparently) want to be governed, and she claimed that everyday she has people calling up, asking for new laws to be made, even for the most minute trivial things...

So you see, it's the damn sheep that are to blame for demanding to be ruled over, because they can't think for themselves..which of course is a product of the manipulation we all have faced.

She really didn't like it when I asked her how it was possible for either the STATE or the COMMONWEALTH, both legal entities, not physical places or locations, to tell me what to do, and that it is not at all possible to be born in or on a paper fiction/entity, nor is it possible to physically do anything in, on or to a paper fiction, so therefore all licences, registrations, birth certificates and citizenships are null and void and invalid by way of misrepresentation and fraud.

She actually had to admit that yes, they were legal entities...

But we all know that, it's just that we need someone to stand up and ask these questions to the right people and make them answer and get it on record.

Cancel the contracts that create the liability, and we separate ourselves from the fiction matrix.

Best
Thomas

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi Arthur,

If you really want any minister to talk with you, reply, or answer any questions...then you should send no more than one page, without all the MAN references and lectures, but merely ask the important questions.

It should come from Arthur Cristian and be addressed to Pru Goward dba PRU GOWARD MP.

Otherwise it will be a waste of time and paper.

For example;

Dear Ms Goward,

It has come to my attention that my natural unalienable right to travel has been criminalised and monopolised, and I would like to know when this happened and who did it, so that they can be held accountable and my freedoms returned.

I have some very important questions for you and would appreciate an explanation.

1. To the best of your knowledge, is the Statute of Monopolies still valid, and if so, then are not the State Licencing Authorities and transport registration departments acting as monopolies and therefore invalid?

2. It has been explained to me by several policy enforcers (Police Officers) that they are not acting in common or civil law, only criminal law, so does this mean that my unalienable rights have been transformed into a criminal activities?

3. It appears that the basis of several "laws" such as bike helmets, seat belts and vehicle registration is liability, and that fines are issued to people for things that "might" or "could" happen in the future...basically speculation. By this same logic, I could arrest you for walking through a shopping centre, simply because there is the possibility you might steal something. There is no difference between the two in terms of probability. There is also no injured party, and no real plaintiff.

4. If liability is the main concern behind licencing and registration, why is it not possible to sign a waiver or indemnity so that those who consider themselves free men or women, can take full responsibility for themselves and not be wards of the state.

5. I would like to know if I am considered a slave or employee of your State or the Commonwealth?

6. If I am considered a slave or employee, then could you please tell me where I can find the signed document or contract that evidences this.

7. If I am not a slave or employee, or otherwise considered chattel property of someone, then by what other Authority do you or any of your policy enforcers claim over me without my consent?

8. Is the COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA and the STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES a physical place, location or landmass, or is it as described on the US SEC website search of companies, and confirmed by it's legal representative Adrian Dietz, a man made fictional entity, essentially a paper corporation?

9. If they are indeed man made legal entities, where is the full and public disclosure of that, and does this not make all licences, registrations (including births, marriages and mortgages) invalid by way of misrepresentation and fraud?

10. Finally, is the fact that there is no lawful money in circulation, backed by anything of value the real reason the people are used as collateral by the government, and therefore is not the government bankrupt and operating in insolvency?

best
Thomas

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi Arthur, I have a reading of your letter to Pru Goward and I just been wondering what it is that you seek to archive with the letter.

I believe that you have written to her in the past and there has been nothing done.

If you seek the suspension of your license to lifted you should taken the matter to Court and present the evidence that you are unable to pay due to hardship and also submitted that by suspending your license, the SDRO has now prevented you from looking for work and provide your family with a better chance of living.

I have not contributed to your letter because I believe much of it cannot be supported with evidence that would provide you support in case the matter is taking to court. You know that Politicians are not going to tell the SDRO to give you back your license as the actions of the SDRO are administrative and not judicial and for which you should have taken the matters to the Supreme Court, but it will be hard for you to argue the matter as you were given the opportunity to pay or take the matters to court but you decided to do the alleged procedures under admiralty law for which there are No evidence that in Court you are on admiralty law.

I am sorry to tell this but, I still do not believe that even Mark can produce a case to support the claims made. Just know that I am Not attacking Mark personally, just his claims for which there are no evidence and I do not intend to waste money on his papers which so far do not show even a remote chance that you or anyone else will win with those claims.

I am against corruption in the Court, Judges, Lawyers specially when the Law Soc has made claims that a person like me is not of good fame and cannot be admitted to practice and it seems that when there are good lawyers with a hearth they make life hell to prevent them from been admitted to practice and there many, like Karen Wenthworth which even to went to the High Court with her matters but corrupt Justice Gummow like always is there to stop you in your tracks.

So you can see that I am not attacking Mark, just the claims which do Not help anyone and can only lead you into more trouble and that is way I do not believe that you will archive anything unless you can take the matters to Court and produce evidence to support your claims that the SDRO has been responsible for your hardship and that is the reasons for you to be unable to pay.

Also you must understand that there is No law not even in common law that gives you the right to drive without insurance and license and I know as I have been reading common law cases since the 17 century onwards to see what basis there was for the claims made by Mark and many others like him and I have found no evidence that admiralty law was being used in the courts at the time No even in Australia after the colonies were granted civil jurisdictions.

Now if you seek to get your license back you should make a claim under the laws even if you do not agree with them. After all there many other Government bodies like Centrelink, which We all use and I am not putting you or your nice family down or being a cheap shot here. It is the truth that there are Governments bodies out there set up under International law to help Australians.

It is only that there are people working or in charge of those bodies that are you can say Satan worshipers and they like to make other people suffer. I know as there are people like that relatives of mine. I have Lawyers in the family and also working in other places of Government. But I cannot say that Everyone or All people are the same. There are shadows controlling the puppets as you know and once light is shined on the shadows we would be in a better place or life if you like.

But for now you can only fight fire with fire and for which I mean the laws even if you do not like it or not agreed with .

Say hello to Fiona and the kids

Sincerely
Palfaro

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Best to keep it simple on 1 page otherwise its unlikely to be read

Read suggested changes only without prejudice

MM

-----------------------------

Arthur: of the family Cristian,

Principal Creditor for ARTHUR CRISTIAN,

Care Of – Post Office Box 1320,

Bowral, New South Wales [2576]

Monday 14th December 2009AD

:Pru: of the family Goward, trading as

PRU GOWARD MEMBER OF NEW SOUTH WALES PARLIAMENT,

288 Bong Bong Street,

Bowral,

New South Wales [2576]

Reference: Correspondence from :Arthur: of the family Cristian dated 16th October 2009

Greetings,

I have not received an answer to the above mentioned correspondence so I am unaware whether you have made any representations on my behalf. The suspension on the person ARTHUR CRISTIAN driver’s licence 8913AF that I wrote to you about was lifted, but the men and women at the State Debt Recovery Office (SDRO) are still demanding money that I do not have. Despite my completing paperwork as requested within the timeframe provided, I have received another notice of Suspension of Drivers Licence, beginning 12 midnight this coming Wednesday, 16th December 2009.

I only got news of this last Friday late afternoon 11th December 2009 when I checked the PO Box. Prior that day, I last checked the PO Box late afternoon Monday 7th December 2009.

I have real reasons to believe I am being both prosecuted and persecuted by ignorant men and women servants

for my differences in promoting real freedom real peace real justice real truth and real independence from a fiction system that is at real war with these natural rights and values ... all this by the very same servant men and women who claim to promote our freedoms peace justice truth in the fiction system with fictitious codes, acts, statutes, policies and other lies on paper.

As you are aware of my real injuries and real complaints from real actions of prosecution and persecution I ask you to really champion my requests hereunder;

My requests are these;

1. that you immediately inform others who need to be informed of my predicament so that they know who they are dealing with should our paths cross. Please immediately inform and send a copy of this letter to all the Heads and all their subordinates of all the Government corporations involved in this monopoly: the State Debt Recovery Office, the Roads and Transport Authority, the Police Service of New South Wales, the Attorney Generals Department, the Premiers Department, the Treasury Department, the Department Of Community Services, the State Governor and the Governor General, the Local, Family, District, Supreme, Federal and High Courts and all others not listed and anyone else you feel relevant.

2. that you make representations on my behalf to have the licence suspension lifted and the fines annulled on the grounds of poverty.

3. please explain

a) how it was possible for either the STATE or the COMMONWEALTH, both legal entities, not physical places or locations, to tell me what to do and;

b) how it is possible to be born in or on a paper fiction/entity and;

c) how it is possible to physically do anything in, on or to a paper fiction??? and therefore;

d) is it true that all licences, registrations, birth certificates and citizenships are null and void and invalid by way of misrepresentation and fraud????

I request your immediate attention to this matter and look forward to your prompt reply.

With my very best regards

For and on behalf of ARTHUR CRISTIAN©TM

By,

Arthur: Cristian Principal.

All rights reserved.

Only in the correct capacity as beneficiary to the original jurisdiction.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------