Love for Life

The Size And Structure Of The Universe According To The Bible And Non-Theoretical Science - Part I To Part III: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6540
The Size And Structure Of The Universe According To The Bible And Non-Theoretical Science - Part IV To Part VII: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6536

The Size and Structure of the Universe - According to the Bible and Non-Theoretical Science - Part IV - Star Trails
A Picture Is Worth A Thousand Words

"Star Trails in Northern Skies" http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/image/9809/northpole_malin.jpg

These two time exposures show the paths traced by the stars as they swarm around the Pole over a period of about eight hours. As the nearest bright star to the Pole, Polaris appears as the small bright crescent in the center of the images.

http://www.glyphweb.com/esky/stars/polaris.html - The famous Pole Star lies less than one degree from the Northern Celestial Pole, and so always lies north from an Earth-bound observer's point of view. Its name comes from Latin, Stella Polaris, meaning simply 'Pole Star'. Its alternative and much rarer name, Cynosura, comes from the Greek for 'tail of the dog'.

Lest anyone wonder how these stars can be going around the earth viewer every 24 hour day as the time exposures plainly show, there is the usual heliocentric explanation under this picture: "As the Earth turns on its axis, the stars in the sky seem to turn around the North Celestial Pole."

The familiar saying about a picture being worth a thousand words was never better illustrated than in the cosmological phenomena depicted above. Hundreds of photographs showing this phenomena with varying lengths of time exposure are available on the Net. Here is another one with what looks like an exposure of an hour or more:

"Palau" http://www.danheller.com/images/Palau/Scenics’star-trails_01.big.jpg

If you can do so for a few minutes, just lay aside the Copernican indoctrination that accompanies such pictures and take a good hard look at these photographs of something that really, really happens every single night.

Do you see what I see? I see all the visible stars in the northern skies going around the North Star in perfect circles. In other words, I see all the stars which these time exposures have recorded actually going around that navigational star that is there for we Earthlings in the Northern Hemisphere. Remember: the first two pictures are eight hour exposures. Again, look closely and you can see the third of a circle in the center and in the next star trail or so. This means that each star circles in one 24 hour day (i.e., 23 hours and 56 minutes).

The same thing is captured in circumpolar photos taken in the Southern Hemisphere....

You see that too, you say, but you "know" that this is really an illusion caused by the Earth rotating West to East ccw every 24 hours. Right? The stars are really not going around the Earth, you want to tell me (as if talking to a seven year old child). It just looks like they are moving because the Earth is rotating around its polar axis, and that rotation gives us the illusion that the stars are actually going around... as any fourth grader will explain to you. If you doubt that is what is really happening, just read under the pictures, for Pete’s sake! Most will tell you the same thing, and the others don’t bother because practically every literate person in the world knows that this is what is happening! mumble, mumble....

Well (...that failed attempt at levity aside), this universally accepted explanation for this phenomena that we can watch with our own eyes and record on our own film is always the same. That is to say, we are assured that what we see and record with our cameras is an illusion caused by the Earth rotating on an axis in an East to West direction at an equatorial speed of c. 1040 MPH.

This universally accepted "explanation" is pure assumption! It is an "explanation" without the first piece of indisputable evidence to support it...and it is in denial of the plentiful evidence that rejects it!

The untouched photos themselves plainly and precisely "explain" what happens to the stars every 23 hours and 56 minutes, namely: They go around a stationary Earth! What we’ve all been taught is an "explanation" is--in fact--just one of seven interdependent assumptions which all interact to uphold the moving Earth mythology: http://www.fixedearth.com/Assumptions.htm

It is immensely important for those who don’t like being deceived to step back and decide for themselves which is an illusion and which is the truth about this observable and photographable phenomena!One of the chief reasons why it is immensely important is that this whole business about the stars having to go around the Earth every night is what makes or breaks either the Biblical Model or the Kabbalic Big Bang Model of the Universe. Both models are totally dependent on the truth or falsity of the "explanation" for what we can see and what the photographs show.

So, which is the illusion?! Is what you can watch and see with your own eyes--and record photographically with your camera--an illusion?

A trick of your eyesight? A delusion? Something imagined...not real?

Or, is what you are told by the Theoretical Science Establishment upholding the Kabbalist Model of the universe... by a single thread, i.e., this very issue of a daily rotating Earth!...the unsubstantiated illusion- delusion -deception??

What will it be? Will you trust your eyes (and your camera!) to record the truth of the matter? Or will you trust the anti-Bible Kabbalist religion’s model of the universe? That Model stands or falls on its ability to keep the world believing that those star trails are caused by something all observational and experimental and pictorial evidence denies, i.e., a daily rotating Earth. Take another look:

http://rocketroberts.com/astro/circum.htm

This is a two hour exposure taken in bright moonlight.

Here is one more example which also appears to be about a two hour exposure. To forestall any questions, it is entitled: "Star Trails as Earth Rotates!" (This is indoctrination, not science, not education!)

http://hou.lbl.gov/~vhoette/Explorations/StarTrails/index.html

An important part of the message below this picture tells us to:

"Notice the difference in the colors of the stars!" O.K. That’s good advice. Now apply that thinking to the optical facts involved with the whole spectrum of colors being reflected off of the crystalline dome specified in the Biblical Model of the Universe!

1: http://www.fixedearth.com/Size%20and%20Structure%20Part%20I.htm
2: http://www.fixedearth.com/Ssize%20and%20Structure%20Part%20II.htm
3: http://www.fixedearth.com/size_and_structure%20Part%20III.htm

Is that Biblical Model of the Universe not perfectly designed to produce these observable colors in this star trail photograph?! And, doesn’t this phenomena provide us with yet another reason to reject the phony redshift claims http://www.fixedearth.com/Redshift%20Fraud.htm which never deviate from pre-programmed computer models which are locked into all the calculations upholding the Big Bang Expanding Universe Paradigm??

Trust your eyes and your cameras! They have no reason to deceive you about whether the stars are going around nightly! Then get it in your mind: This single fact surrounding star trails that has been photographed thousands of times and cannot be denied must be explained away by the Theoretical Science Establishment. All of the factless allegations--a rotating and orbiting Earth; billions of light year distances to the stars; a 15 billion year old universe; the whole Big Bang Paradigm; all of the alleged evolution of the universe, earth, and mankind; ...that is to say: all of modern evolution-based cosmology controlling "knowledge" today...all of it... is completely undone if the stars are doing what cameras show they are doing, namely, going around the Earth nightly...

See below or goGo HERE: http://www.fixedearth.com/Size%20&%20Structure%20Part%20V.htm for Part V of "The Size and Structure of the Universe According to the Bible and Non- Theoretical Science". The title: "The Mother of All Space Science Fraud Is At Work In the Measurement Of Star Distances In Space". Part VI - "Pages of Additional Evidence of Across-the Board Deceptions in the Measurement of Star Distances in Space"-- will be linked 11/1/03. Part VII: "A Clear and Unavoidable Choice Between the Biblical and Kabbalist Creation Models Looms for One and All". This final discourse in the Series on the Size and Structure of the Universe will be linked 12/1/03.

Link to this webpage: http://www.fixedearth.com/Size_and_Structure%20Part%20IV.htm

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Size and Structure of the Universe - According to the Bible and Non-Theoretical Science
Part V - The Mother of All Space Science Fraud Is At Work

In The Measurement of Star Distances

Considering that it must be clear by now that the whole matter of the structure and size of the universe is a contest between two religious teachings about the Origin of the universe and all that is in it, we must try to sort out which religious teaching we are going to accept when all the evidence is factored in.

Uppermost in one’s mind in this decision should be these seven points which have been shown to be demonstrable facts in previous discourses in this series and in the seven essays on "The Kabbala" particularly:

1) The indispensable foundation of all modern cosmology is the Copernican Model of a rotating, orbiting Earth and a stationary sun.

2) This foundational heliocentric model is built solely on seven interdependent assumptions which defy observational and experimental evidence.

3) The observationally verifiable transit of the stars around the Earth nightly is said by modern cosmology to be forever disproved because some of the stars are 15 billion light years distant and the speed they would have to go to get around nightly is so great as to be incomprehensible and foolish to consider; ergo, the Earth is rotating, causing it to appear that the stars are revolving nightly.

4) The determination of which model of the universe is the true one comes to rest on the matter of the "thickness" or radius of the universe, i.e., the distance from Earth to the furthermost known entity in the universe. Though theoretically the Machian Geocentricity Model claims any speed is possible, the Model is not taken seriously by very many people. The reason is isn’t taken seriously is because it also accepts billions of light year distances to the most distant stars and therefore must accept the speeds required to get them around nightly. When it is realized that those speeds are forced to be millions of times faster than the speed of light, the credulity of even those who want to believe what they see and want to believe the Bible’s plain stationary earth teachings

1: http://www.fixedearth.com/sixty-seven%20references.htm
2: http://www.fixedearth.com/links/gram_semant.htm

is stretched beyond the breaking point. This conclusion about distances and speeds is, of course, the conclusion that has been made by the world...and even Christian churches committed to Biblical Creationism. This conclusion speaks volumes as to not only the steady decline of Bible credibility and Christian influence since Copernicanism took hold but, beyond that, a solid explanation for the dramatic acceleration of that decline since the evolutionary mind-set which fuels Big Bangism began its conquest of academia and the media more than a generation ago.

5) This situation forces all of us to stop and remind ourselves that triumphant modern cosmology has presented itself to the world as being a secular scientific enterprise while in reality--though the fact has been long hidden from the world!--the 15 billion year old and 15 billion light year thick universe concept is derived directly from one of the holy books of Pharisaic Judaism called the Kabbala

1: http://www.fixedearth.com/nasas_hanky-panky.htm
2: http://www.fixedearth.com/kabbala%20II.htm ,p.7
3: http://www.fixedearth.com/kabbala%20VI.htm

6) Because of the centuries long secrecy surrounding the fact that all the essential elements of modern cosmology--15 billion years, Copernicanism, Relativism, Big Bangism, an Expanding Universe--are derived from the metaphysical Kabbala, the success and magnitude of the deception that has been palmed off on the world as "science" has created an entirely false picture about the size and structure of the universe. This "knowledge of the universe and its origin" has been portrayed as a contest between "science" and the Bible, and--via a ceaseless evolutionary drumbeat throughout the media and academia--the loud and clear message is that "science" has won that contest. However, since the cat is out of the bag about this incredibly deceptive covert religious operation--with all of its knowledge and culture-shaking ramifications--the exposure of what has really happened draws closer with each passing day. As the word gets around and the fact sinks in that the spiritual motivation of anti-Christ Kabbalism/Talmudism has always been to destroy the credibility of the Biblical Universe and the Biblical God behind it all, such an awakening to the truth of the matter will open even the most jaundiced eyes and establish a motive that can not be ignored. Whether that Truth is welcomed or hated will depend on the individual receiving it.

7) When those factual parameters are understood, even the most earnest skeptics should be open to discovering: a) What the Biblical Universe really entails; b) What true scientific support relates to it; and: c) What further evidence is required to determine which is authentic and which is fraudulent. Parts I, II, III, and IV have provided a basic understanding of what the Bible teaches and what facts confirm about the size and structure of the universe. It is clear from that understanding that there is one problem that causes people to be afraid to reject all of modern cosmology from Copernicanism through Big Bangism, and that problem is a conviction that "science" has proven that the stars are too far away to go around the Earth nightly as they are observed to go. That problem should dissipate as one begins to realize that: a) The Biblical model--and the historical and scientific facts that support it--shrinks the size of the universe to no more than a one light day, a size which allows the stars to go around nightly as observed quite nicely, thank you; and: b) All the "science falsely so called"--with which we have all been thoroughly indoctrinated--is a big, fat, hairy Virtual Reality deception from start to finish....: http://www.fixedearth.com/Virtual%20Reality%20Fraud.htm

When all this and more begins to really percolate in one’s mind, a veritable tornado of choices immediately threatens to overwhelm any thinking person. "It’s just unthinkable!" will top the list. Nevertheless, when one does come to grips with the inescapable reality that every facet of modern man’s "knowledge" (HERE) is dependent upon a "creation scenario" embodied in anti-Christ Kabbalism disguised as "science", the die will have been cast, the dice will have been rolled, the Rubicon will have been crossed.

Verily, once it sinks in what has happened to produce the evolutionary mind set that controls all but a fraction of everything modern man believes, there can be no turning back for the lover of truth. Whatever the personal cost in pride and all the rest, a choice will have to be made by every one regarding deception. That choice will be: a) Whether to prefer the lies about the evolution of the universe, the earth, and mankind, and all that is handcuffed to those lies...including death without hope; or: b) To be amazed but pleased to be freed from such deception and to know there is a Creator God with an eternal plan, and that this plan has been and is being offered to all who "can receive a love of the truth" (II Thess. 2:10), and; c) To seek His direction in what looms ahead under a Satan-empowered, Satan- worshipping , God-blaspheming, global government under which every last detail of genuine Biblical eschatology will be fulfilled [Rev.13:2b-7; http://www.fixedearth.com/the_bible/endtimedrama.html & http://www.fixedearth.com/the_bible/endtimedramasales.html

OK. Enough of that. It’s time to expand our understanding of how state-of- the-art technology has been and is being used to establish and uphold the Kabbalic Big Bang Model of an evolved and evolving universe of a size and structure that destroys the Biblical account of Creation and the Christianity that rests upon total Bible credibility. Previous essays on the use of high-tech fraud in this battle between the Creation Scenarios of two antithetical religions should be kept in mind as we go forward with this expansion of that theme

1: http://www.fixedearth.com/nasas_hanky-panky.htm
2: http://www.fixedearth.com/Virtual%20Reality%20Fraud.htm
3: http://www.fixedearth.com/Redshift%20Fraud.htm
4: http://www.fixedearth.com/Size%20and%20Structure%20Part%20VI.htm

Fraud In The Measurement Of Distances In Space

The size of the universe is, after all, the bottom line between the Biblical Model and the Kabbalic Model, isn’t it?

The Kabbalic Big Bang Model is joined at the hip with the Expanding Universe Model. One has no meaning without the other. And the age of the Big Bang Expanding Universe Model is determined by the alleged distances from the alleged explosion that the stars and other objects have allegedly traveled to date, i.e., an incomprehensible 15 billion light years. Using the Einsteinian speed limit, this has taken 15 billion years at light speed. So, the universe is 15 billion years old and 15 billion light years thick according to today’s "science" supported by today’s technology. (Don’t forget: Each part of this "scientific" Model is derived from the writings of Kabbalist Rabbis from the 1st century to today: http://www.fixedearth.com/kabbala%20II.htm pp.2-4 http://www.fixedearth.com/kabbala%20VI.htm

Something that must be completely clear in our minds before going on to the distance measuring fraud upholding Big Bangism (mostly by people who doubtless have no idea what they are really doing) is that Big Bangism is first and foremost the intended final triumph of the concept of Evolutionism over Biblical (and Koranic) Creationism. Either an explosion 15 billion years ago created the universe, and the earth, and mankind by accident without any need for God...or maybe some kind of impersonal clockwinder g-d http://www.fixedearth.com/intelligent_design_pitfalls.htm Or...a Designer God with an eternal Plan for mankind had the resources to do it and created all of it in six 24 hour days about 6000 years ago.

As it turns out, both of these Models require faith in separate "creation scenarios" from different books belonging to different religions. The world doesn’t know this, and believes its faith in an evolved universe and earth and mankind is a secular scientific concept upheld by solid proofs which have nothing to do with any religion. That fact, and the means by which faith in this "science falsely so called" has virtually triumphed (despite its being based 100% on assumptions which contradict all observational and known scientific evidence), makes the deceptive Kabbalic Model highly vulnerable despite its seemingly impregnable position in the world today.

Again, here’s why that is so: Every single aspect of Kabbalic Big Bang Kosmology is dependent on one’s continued belief that the Earth is rotating daily and orbiting the sun annually. If it is the Sun and not the Earth that is moving--as the Bible teaches repeatedly http://www.fixedearth.com/sixty-seven%20references.htm & http://www.fixedearth.com/links/gram_semant.htm and as all observational and experimental evidence confirms--then its Humpty Dumpty City for evolutionary cosmology and biology and all the rest of modern man’s "knowledge" http://www.fixedearth.com/knowledge%20impact.htm that is built on those incredible myths masquerading as "science".

So, is it possible that the entire construct of Kabbalist Big Bangism--which establishes an evolutionary mind-set about the origin of the universe, the Earth, and mankind--is a concept that rests wholly on continued faithful acceptance of a rotating, orbiting Earth? Is that faith in a rotating, orbiting Earth all that is holding up the Kabbalic religion’s "origins scenario" of a 15 billion year old explosion-generated universe that is 15 billion light years thick?? Can it be that the fate of this faith in this "creation scenario" of the religion of anti-Christ Kabbalism-- which is far advanced toward destroying faith in the "creation scenario" of the religion of anti-Kabbalist Christianity--hangs in the balance wholly over the matter of whether the Earth is moving or not??

THAT IS PRECISELY THE SITUATION! Let’s establish first that it is an undeniable fact that the Copernican Heliocentricity Model of a rotating and orbiting Earth is the premise...i.e., the tightly muted but indispensable foundation of the Kabbalic Universe. Notice in the quotations which follow that this very premise is inseparable from the whole "science" of measuring DISTANCES in space:

The Copernican Premise Upholding The Big-Bang Paradigm

"Astrometric measurements not only determine the position of objects on the celestial sphere (sky), but also can be used to measure the distances to the stars. By measuring the change in a star’s position as the earth revolves around the sun, you can determine the distance to that star. This change in [a star’s] position [based on a sun-orbiting earth] is known as a star’s parallax....Astrometry is the foundation on which almost all of astronomy is based...the bedrock of methods for determining DISTANCES to astronomical objects...."1

So, plainly admitted, the whole concept we have of distances to the stars is founded on the premise that the heliocentric model of a sun-orbiting Earth is a fact. Just as plainly, if that premise is wrong then all the alleged distances to the stars are baseless. This understanding is vital to the truth of the whole matter when it is realized that those fantasized distances are the only thing holding the Copernican concept together in the first place! Another quote about this all-important parallax concept as a measure of distances to the stars confirms the dependency on a moving Earth:

"Trigonometric parallax is the apparent displacement of a nearby star

against the background of more distant stars

resulting from the motion of the earth in its orbit around the sun....

If a star’s parallax can be measured,

it then determines the distance to the star...."2

Hmmm. Though still dependent "on the motion of the earth in its orbit around the sun", we notice that the "trigonometric parallax" is only good for "nearby stars" which, this encyclopedic report notes, is only "useful for stars within 100 parsecs". One parsec is defined as "the distance...equivalent to 206,265 times the distance from the earth to the sun, or about 3.3 light-years." That would put "100 parsecs" some 330 light-years distant from an orbiting earth, virtually at our elbows in current cosmologyese. (Work it out arithmetically and see what you get in either miles or kilometers. Then try it with the Kabbalic 15 billion light-year distance and you will begin to get a real sense of the kind of funny-farm pretext of "scientific" exactitude that is involved here. One is reminded of Darwin’s annoyance with Sir Wm. Thompson’s calculation that evolution took 98 million years. Southall noted that: "Mr. Darwin represents that it must have taken three hundred and six millions six hundred and sixty two thousand four hundred years.") 3

Now notice how the orbiting earth premise continues to be the foundation of all other techniques for measuring distances to stars that are claimed to be millions and billions of light-years away even though it is admitted that the trigonometric parallax method is limited to "nearby" stars:

"The first stellar parallax (the trigonometric one) was measured in 1838 by Friedrich Bessel for the star 61 Cygni. Its parallax of 0.3 places it at a distance of 3.3 parsecs or about 11 light-years...." 4

I had to read this two or three times before it sank in...and the same message is standard in all reports on the subject. What message? This blue ribbon pseudo-scientific hornswoggle that ranks up there with the best the world has to offer, that’s what! Herr Bessel’s "finding" (in 1838!) for the distance to 61 Cygni based on his trigonometric parallax hypothesis of parsecs has become the standard cosmological reference for distances to all the "nearby" stars! This is in spite of the fact that the method was calculated upon and was therefore deduced from the conviction in virtually all cosmological circles by that time that the earth orbited the sun and was on opposite sides of the sun every six months.. as has now become a "fact", of course. Since any accurate application of parallax to the calculation of distances is wholly dependent upon the position of the observer relevant to that which is being observed, Bessel’s deduction was based on faith in the heliocentric assumption that the position of the earthbound observer changed every six months by some 186,000,000 miles (the diameter of the alleged earth orbit).

By contrast, Geocentric parallax is a technique which uses the diameter of the earth as a baseline. Because of this small baseline (8000 miles) this parallax is useful only for close objects such as the Moon and perhaps a few planets. Thus, if the earth and its observers are not orbiting the sun, the standard for distance measurements that is arbitrarily set at 206,265 x 93,000,000 miles based on an 0.3 parallax taken from an observation point 186,000,000 miles away from the previous observation point...those measurements would produce a distance that is 23,250 times larger than a distance calculated from a stationary earth! (8000 x 23250=186,000,000)

The importance of what has happened here relevant to true measurement of distances in space can not be overstated! The only reason any parallax at all showed up for Bessel’s star 61 Cygni (0.3) was because the baseline for the observer was assumed to be One-Hundred and Eighty Six Million Miles further away than the baseline of the observer six months earlier...thus giving a baseline on a triangle of 186,000,000 miles instead of 8000 miles!

The proof that calculations of "nearby" star distances are dependent upon the heliocentric assumption of a rotating, orbiting Earth couldn’t be more clear. What we have here is mathematical tautology, pure and simple, viz.,: The earth orbits the sun and provides a parallax figure which pushes even the close stars out 23,250 times further than they would be if a non-moving earth parallax were used. Then the light-year distances derived from this slight of hand are used to "prove" that the earth cannot be stationary because the stars are too far away to get around nightly!

Some epithets come to mind...but I forbear. Using stationary earth parallax, how far away is Bessel’s star 61 Cygni really? Based on an orbiting earth, he put it at 3.3 parsecs (about 11 light) years distant from earth. That’s about 64 trillion, 660 billion miles. If the earth is not moving, his figure is 23,250 times too big and the parallax distance would be c. 2 billion, 800 million miles (the alleged Earth to Neptune distance). That’s more like it, but stationary earth parallax calculations are too small to triangulate even at that distance.

An article from Sky and Telescope tells us that Bessel’s orbiting earth distance definition of a parsec is applied to alleged distance benchmarks of 1,000 parsecs and 1,000,000 parsecs, both still rooted in the assumption of a heliocentric parallax diameter 23,250 times as great as a geocentric parallax diameter yields....

"Professional astronomers often use another unit [than the a.u. 93 mil. miles]

for big distances: the parsec. One parsec equals 3.26 light years.

(In case you’re really wondering, a parsec is the distance where a star shows

a parallax of one arcsecond against the background sky

when the earth moves 1 a.u. around the sun.)

A kiloparsec is 1,000 parsecs, and a megaparsec is a million parsecs."5

Another source admits:

"It is almost impossible to tell the distances of objects we see in the sky...but not quite, and astronomers have developed a large variety of techniques. [Have they ever!] Here I will

describe 26 [!] of them. I will ignore the work that went into determining the

astronomical unit [a.u.]: the scale factor for the Solar System,

and just consider distances outside of the Solar System.

A. TRIGONOMETRIC PARALLAX

This method rates an A because it is the gold standard for astronomical distances.

It is based on measuring two angles and the included side of a triangle

formed by 1) the star, 2) the Earth on one side of its orbit, and

3) the Earth six months later on the other side of its orbit.6

Again we see the complete dependency on the unproved assumption of an orbiting Earth in calculating star distances. If that assumption is wrong, all alleged star distances upholding the pseudo-scientific Kabbalic Universe are 23,250 times too large right off the bat. That would be big time wrong, would you agree?!

But that’s not the worst of this built-in deception booster! No, no! All it does is to invite theory-happy cosmologists trained never to question the evolutionary mind-set to roll up their sleeves and see what they can come up with to "simulate" more stars and galaxies and nebula and planets and then to ascertain their distances with a great show of exactitude.

The article above notes that there are at lease 26 different techniques for stretching star distances to fit the Kabbalic Big Bang Paradigm! Think of it! Twenty-six different theoretical models just to stretch star distances! Then think of all the mind-blowing software sophistication all of which is premised on previous assumptions that are handcuffed to the rotating-orbiting Earth assumptions.... All of this pre-digested "science" has been programmed into computerized technology for one purpose, namely, to push those distances out to the 15 + billion light year boundary set by Kabbalist Rabbis centuries ago http://www.fixedearth.com/kabbala%20II.htm and currently articulated by Kabbalist physicist Schroeder http://www.fixedearth.com/nasas_hanky-panky.htm & http://www.fixedearth.com/kabbala%20VI.htm et al.

Note to all these theorists: You can stop inventing those extra distances.... The Kabbalist "Origins Scenario" is settled on those figures and they are triumphant in the "science" world. That’s all that religion requires, so stop already. The age and size of the universe is agreed upon by one and all from the 4th grade through the Ph.D to be 15 billion years old and 15 billion light years thick. So, let’s just see you Bible Freaks who say the Earth isn’t rotating and orbiting the sun try to get those stars around a 45-47 billion light year track every night! Heh, heh, heh....

Comparisons and comments need to be amplified on the multitude of theoretical techniques that are pure and simple distance measuring deceptions being applied to bodies in space, not only stars, but even for planets beyond Saturn. Other means of coming up with those thousands and millions and billions of light year distances claimed by the Kabbalist Big Bang Paradigm must be believed...or that dog won’t hunt.

We are going to look at a bunch of those far out claims in Part VI titled:

"Pages of Additional Evidence of Across-the Board Deceptions

In the Measurements of Star Distances in Space"

http://www.fixedearth.com/Size%20and%20Structure%20Part%20VI.htm after 11-1-03

Bibliography

1 - FAME Frequently Asked Questions, http://www.usno.navy.mil/FAME/faq, p.1, 6-1-01

2 - Infoplease.com, Parallax, http://www.infoplease.com/ce6/sci/A0837583, html, p.1, 5-15-03

3 - James C. Southall, The Recent Origin of Man, (Philadelphia: J.P. Lippincott & Co., 1875),p 56

4 - Op. cit., Infoplease.com

5 - Sky & Telescope, "Words Ya Gotta Know", Alan M. MacRobert, http://www.

skyandtelescope. com

6 - Trigonometric Parallax, http://www.astro.ucla.edu’~wright/distance.htm, p. 1

Link to this webpage: http://www.fixedearth.com/Size%20&%20Structure%20Part%20V.htm

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Size and Structure of the Universe - According to the Bible and Non-Theoretical Science
Part VI - More Unyielding Evidence of Flagrant Deceptions

In The Measurement Of Star Distances

...Keeping in mind what we’ve already seen in Part V about the Besselian parallax quicksand upon which the "science" of measuring distances in space is built, let’s focus now on several pages of further hard evidence which shows that those fantastic distances are phony baloney from start to finish.

Anyone seriously looking at today’s textbook cosmological science which has tricked the world into believing that the universe is 15 billion years old and 15 billion light years thick must keep these twelve facts in mind as they continue to weigh what has gone before and what is to follow:

Fact One: The incomprehensibly old and vast universe that has been taught as scientific truth for generations is first and foremost an evolutionary concept from start to finish.

Fact Two: This evolutionary concept includes the acceptance of a belief that the Earth itself evolved billions of years ago.

Fact Three: The Copernican Revolution (officially launched in 1543) gradually established the belief that our Earth was just a lucky accident that happened to be the right distance from an ordinary star we call the sun. This belief begat the "logical" conviction amongst the "intelligentsia" that there would be other "earths" with other life on them amongst the ever increasing myriad of stars that astronomers were allegedly finding and the ever increasing ages and distances they were assigned.

Fact Four: All of the points of light that were called stars that could be seen were too small and too far away for their distances to be determined by normal trigonometric and geometric methods. Undaunted, other pseudo mathematical means were formulated by Bessel in 1838. His formula immediately pushed the closest stars out to distances that had to be accounted for in multiple light years.

Fact Five: As pointed out http://www.fixedearth.com/Size%20&%20Structure%20Part%20V.htm (pp. 4-7), Bessel’s "breakthrough" in establishing mind-boggling distances to the stars--which is still the standard cosmological foundation for measuring distances to the stars today--was based on the unproved premise that the Earth orbits the sun. This premise allowed the base of a triangle to a star to be 186,000,000 miles, the diameter of the alleged orbit of the Earth around the Sun. If, however, the Earth is stationary with the sun orbiting it--as all observational evidence insists--then the base of that triangle is only 8,000 miles. That means that Besselian "math" puts the stars 23,250 times too far out.

Fact Six: Time is the hero of the evolution plot, both for the universe and for Earth. Without the billions of years that the space "sciences" have assigned to the alleged evolution of the universe, the evolutionary explanation for all that exists takes its proper place at the top of the list of deceptions that has led mankind away from the truth about the universe, the Earth, and humanity itself.

Fact Seven: Though traceable to Pythagoras http://www.fixedearth.com/pythagoras.htm Aristarchus, et al, it wasn’t until The Copernican Revolution provided a mathematical model for a moving Earth that the physical sciences--powered by ever more arcane/occult mathematics--gradually got on the heliocentricity bandwagon. The effect of this Revolution was to remove the Earth and Mankind--along with the sun, moon, and stars--from being the entire focus of God’s Plan as stated in the "creation scenario" of the Bible (and similarly in the Koran)...to a "creation scenario" where there was no focus, no plan, and no need for God...or, certainly, no Biblical God offering a plan for eternal life to mankind. The Copernican Revolution not only declared the Bible wrong (and also the Koran: http://www.fixedearth.com/koran.html), and not only made the Earth and Mankind insignificant accidents in a universe full of star/suns with fantasized planets and evolving life forms, it also provided an open door for theoretical science to steadily expand the age and size of the universe to fit the present Big Bang Kabbala Model of the Pharisee Religion.

Fact Eight: The Copernican Revolution from its beginning to this very hour has been based on seven assumptions http://www.fixedearth.com/Assumptions.htm each one of which defies all observational and experimental evidence, and is upheld solely by: a) A clever mathematical model; and: b) A growing conviction now believed to be unshakable that the distances to the stars are so great that it is simply unimaginable that they could go around the Earth nightly as the Bible demands and as observation and photos confirm http://www.fixedearth.com/Size_and_Structure%20Part%20IV.htm

Fact Nine: By its conquest of the Physical Sciences, the Copernican Revolution has gradually and almost completely destroyed the Bible’s claim to be the Absolute and Inerrant Truth from God. This success paved the way for the recent triumph of another "origins scenario" wherein the Earth and Mankind and the sun, moon, and stars were not unique and central to a great Plan by God, but rather were merely the by-products of the interaction of cosmic forces over eons of time.

Fact Ten: With a "science"-endorsed evolving universe accepted virtually everywhere--including Christian Churches--the stage was set for the conquest of the Biological Sciences by those promoting the evolutionary mind-set. Though percolating for over a century before Darwin, he gave the movement a "natural selection" mechanism in 1859. Then the evolutionary premise for all that exists spread rapidly to the "Social Sciences" (K. Marx et al), the "Behavioral Sciences" (S. Freud et al), Philosophy and Education (F. Nietzsche, J. Dewey, A. Einstein et al), the Arts (Bartok, Picasso, Joyce et al), along with a century of physicists and astronomers http://www.fixedearth.com/theoretical%20sci.Part%20I.htm ...culminating in NASA’s "Origins Program" of Kabbalists Sagan and Goldin http://www.fixedearth.com/nasas_agenda.htm and on to the present hour where Kabbalist Physicist Schroeder et al treat Big Bangism as if it is factual, and equate the Biblical six days with 15 billion years http://www.fixedearth.com/kabbala%20VI.htm

Fact Eleven: The long-hidden fact that all of the essential components of today’s "science"-backed evolutionary explanation for all that exists, i.e., Billion of years; Copernicanism; Relativity; Big Bangism; an Expanding Universe... is really a religious "creation scenario", is now out in the open. As documented repeatedly on this webpage and confirmed by Kabbalist Physicist Schroeder http://www.fixedearth.com/kabbala%20VI.htm et al, Rabbinical writings in the Kabbala centuries ago described the Big Bang evolutionary "origins scenario" that is the basis of all of man’s "knowledge" today http://www.fixedearth.com/knowledge%20impact.htm In short, Big Bangism and all that goes with it is the fulfillment of an anti-Christ, anti-Bible religion of Pharisaic Judaism masquerading as "theoretical science".

Fact Twelve: There is an alternative model of the size and structure, age and purpose of the universe, the Earth, and mankind which is 100% Biblical, 100% scientifically viable, and 100% logical. This alternative model rests on the premise of a stationary Earth that is supported by all observational and experimental evidence. This solid premise reduces the size of the universe to less than one ten trillioneth of what is cited in textbooks today.

With that said, it’s time to add to the list

1: http://www.fixedearth.com/nasas_agenda.htm
2: http://www.fixedearth.com/nasas_hanky-panky.htm
3: http://www.fixedearth.com/Redshift%20Fraud.htm

of ways that the space "sciences" have been and now are deceiving the world about the size and age of the universe and thereby maintaining the evolutionary mythology. Though there are enough quotations in the files beside me to make a good-sized book; I will try to present the meat of what is going on in the next 16 pages. Consider these quotations which tell of facts about space science and the comments that apply to those facts:

Telescopes

Quotation: "If one could look through the 200 inch telescope on Mt. Palomar, one would see stars as nothing more than the same points of light you would see by simply walking outside and looking up. Why are stars the sole hold out in the resolution revolution up to now? Simply put, stars are very small and very far away...." 1 (Note: Emph. added to many of the citations throughout.)

Comment: Even when we look through telescopes almost 17 feet wide the stars look the same as when we go outside and look up. What we see through a monster telescope costing many millions of $ is not altered, enhanced, resolved. Strange isn’t it? Why? Q:"...they are very small and very far away". (Yeah, and you have 26 different measurement "techniques" to get them "very far away", don’t you? http://www.fixedearth.com/Size%20&%20Structure%20Part%20V.htm (p. 7).

***

Quotation: "...But the atmosphere...blurs the ability to see detail.... This is why telescopes in space like HST [Hubble Space Telescope], are so important..." 2

Comment: Amongst some very pertinent background info on Edwin Hubble there is a statement made by Hubble himself about the so-called "Hubble Expansion" being attributed to him concerning the alleged recession of the stars from a Big Bang. This is a statement that is basically ignored by one and all: Hubble himself said: "There is no evidence of expansion and no restriction of the time scale, no trace of spatial curvature...." http://www.fixedearth.com/theoretical_science_establishmen.htm (pp. 4,5) Wow! As for any other critics of turning to the Hubble Telescope for final answers, this astronomer aptly notes: Q: "...anything which decouples the link between redshift and expansion is viewed with horror, as both of these factors link to the age of the universe through the Hubble Constant." 3

***

Quotation: "...the Hubble Deep Field only surveyed 1/36 millionth of the sky!" 4

Comment: One 36th millionth! That’s a pretty small potato patch to be extrapolating about potatoes all over a universe that is 36,000,000 times bigger than your sample, isn’t it?

***

Quotation: "Concept designs for the ESO telescope, dubbed the ‘OverWhelmingly Large Telescope’ (OWL), call for an instrument with a 109 yard (100 meter) aperture [!] made up of segmented mirrors to peer deep into the universe.... At its heart is a system known as adaptive optics, which allows astronomers to correct for the blurring effect of the atmosphere.... OWL scientists hope their telescope could find...other potentially life sustaining biospheres.... OWL is expected to cost over $1,000,000,000...." 5

Comment: If blurring is a problem and space telescopes solve the problem, why are ten countries (ESO) planning an earth-bound "OverWhelmingly Large Telescope (OWL)" with an opening bigger than a football field that costs a Billion Bucks? Well, of course, to Q: "find other potentially life sustaining biospheres", what else?? Everything comes back to establishing the evolutionary mind-set for the universe, Earth, and Mankind. This is a religious "creation scenario", not science! The religion is Pharisaic Judaism; the holy book describing this "creation scenario" is the Kabbala http://www.fixedearth.com/kabbala%20I.htm & http://www.fixedearth.com/nasas_spiritual_roots.htm (p.5)

***

Quotation: "How did the universe begin and evolve? How did we get here? Are we alone?.... Our missions and research generate most of the coolest news coming out of NASA.... Our science stretches...to the beginning of the universe, billions of light years away." 6

Comment: NASA spokespeople regularly ask these deep, deep questions about the Origins of Everything. Then, as usual, Evolutionary Big Bang Expanding Universe answers are supplied in the next paragraph as if they were strictly secular conclusions with no religious bias. If, however, those "answers" have an indisputable religious origin that is many centuries old and that religion has always been the overt adversary of the Bible’s creation account, what does that mean to you?

***

Quotation: "Galaxy Evolution Explorer Mission Status, May 6, 2003 News Release, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology: ...engineers...have powered up both the digital processing unit, which houses the main computer, and the detector front-end electronics box, which contains the photon discrimination and processing logic....High voltage is essential for the telescope to gather the ultraviolet photons that will help scientists piece together the story of how and when stars form inside galaxies.... The Galaxy Evolution Explorer mission will image millions of galaxies across 10 billion years of cosmic history, which is 80-percent of the way back to the Big Bang...." 7

Comment: Obviously the Big Bang evolutionary mind-set with its 15 billion light year age for the universe is the mother of all that is programmed into the "main computer" and all it controls in this "gee whiz" operation. Is there anyone alive who thinks that anything that doesn’t fit that mind-set is going to be programmed into that computer?? The GEE mission "will image" [not "see"] millions of galaxies and they will be Q: "80 percent of the way back to the Big Bang". This "Explorer" knew precisely what it was to "discover" and report before it was launched.

***

Quotation: "Ground-based Optical/Near-Infrared large Telescopes are crucial tools...but their image quality is severely limited...leading to more and more sophisticated techniques....Until recently, the astronomical telescope has remained a "passive instrument".... Without any in-built corrective devices to improve the quality of star images during observations.... Because of the high bandwidth and the small field to which correction can be applied, adaptive optics uses a small deformable mirror.... In some current projects, the possibility of using a large deformable secondary mirror is being developed.... 8

Comment: There are plenty of $ going into "more and more sophisticated techniques" to build into telescopes "corrective devices to improve star images", including "deformable mirrors".... My Thesaurus equates "deformable" with "distorted, abnormal, misshapen, disfigured..." Does this sound like an all-out effort to accurately report what can really be seen where stars are concerned?? The images demanded by the evolution paradigm are created by this kind of fraudulent use of technology, pure and simple. Lot’s more on this http://www.fixedearth.com/Redshift%20Fraud.htm where, along with other tech fraud in space "science", we learn that: Q: "The New Generation Space Telescope is designed to produce "a pretty ratty image that looks like an interference pattern [so that] a series of interference patterns can be combined to form a perfect synthesized image.." http://www.fixedearth.com/nasas_hanky-panky.htm (p.3) NASA’s H P (Note: The name of the NGST has been changed to: the James Webb Space Telescope.)

***

Quotation: "No matter where astronomers point their telescopes, they see a distant sheet of light surrounding us. Beyond that shell of radiation, astronomers can see nothing...." 9

Comment: This author goes on to give the standard explanation, namely that this "radiation" is Q: "the faint afterglow of the big bang".... But wouldn’t the Biblical Model with its massively reflective crystalline "shell"--described throughout this series--also present astronomers with a "distant sheet of light surrounding us"??

Of course it would! Another key point here is that Q: "astronomers can see nothing" beyond that "shell of radiation". What they claim to see is fabricated and computer programmed, as this Creationist scientist who is beginning to smell a very big rat notes: Q: "It is well to remember that a great deal of modern cosmology, especially when its practitioners are trying to predict its destiny and rotrodict its origin, is sheer mathematical manipulation and evolutionary philosophical imagination. ‘It ain’t necessarily so!" 10 A hearty "Amen" to that!

***

Quotation: "Where do the laws of physics come from?" (an MIT astrophysicist was asked. He replied:) "We are a long way from being able to answer that one." 11

Comment: The Creationist scientist writing the article sums up his review of the Big Bang literature: Q: "...They simply do not know how our galaxy began. Even less could be known about other galaxies....It is well to remember that they do not know how the cosmos evolved--or stars, or galaxies, or anything else..." Wow! 12

***

Quotation: "A small spherical universe after all"? This is a sub-heading in a piece by a professional astronomer and a leading geocentrist who goes on to say: Q: "...researchers have particularly studied small universe models, which explain the billions of visible galaxies as repeating images of a smaller number of actual galaxies"[!]. (He continues): "...spherical spaceforms (geometries in which the universe is viewed as a sphere) have come back to the forefront of cosmology"[!]....13

Comment: You say you haven’t heard any such thing on your evening news?? Maybe its because that news is programmed by people with the same evolutionary fixation as those who are running NASA’s "Origins Program". They are spending Billions of your tax $ to promote the Kabbalist "creation scenario" whilst they simultaneously destroy Biblical Christianity. It’s the old "killing two birds with one stone" game. Problem is: Truth in science and in the Bible are the birds being killed!

***

Quotation: "The Doppler Redshift results from the relative motion of the light emitting object and the observer. If the source of light is moving away from you then the wavelength of the light is stretched out, i.e., the light is shifted toward the red...."14

Comment: The redshift voodooism is the life-blood of Kabbalic Big Bangism. Notice this from another source which addresses the "redshift controversy":

***

Quotation: "It is known that many astronomical observations cannot be explained by means of the ordinary Doppler shift interpretation. The mere examination of a recent catalog of objects having very large redshifts shows that among 109 quasi-stellar objects, in which both absorption and emissions lines could be measured, the value of the absorption redshift in a given object, is always different from the one measured in emission for the same object. It is clear that such results cannot be explained as being due solely to a Doppler redshift. A New mechanism must be looked for, in order to explain those inconsistent redshifts and many other observations related to the ‘redshift controversy’".... 15

Comment: The props that are holding up the Kabbalic Kosmos are threatening to give way on all sides. There is really no true scientific strength in those props. They are going to break and set off a veritable firestorm of God’s Truth that will begin with a non-moving Earth and lead to the unmasking of all of Satan’s deceptions upholding his Babylonish empire (Rev. 17:14). Notice these other props and how they are always fabricated out of the Kabbalic alloys of billions of years, heliocentricity, relativism, big bangism, and an expanding universe:

***

Quotation: "The Cosmological Redshift is a redshift caused by the expansion of space. The wavelength of light increases as it traverses the expanding universe.... The Gravitational Redshift is a shift in the frequency of a photon to lower energy as it climbs out of a gravitational field...." 16

Comment: This account brings up an interesting question about both of these weak hypotheses: Q: "Astrophysical observations show that the electromagnetic radiation originating from cosmological objects is often redshifted. Except for some hypothesis such as assuming that it is a gravitational redshift, this has always been interpreted as a Doppler shift. To date, the interaction of light with interstellar gas has not been seriously considered as a possible mechanism responsible for the observed redshift because no known forward scattering process could be demonstrated to lead to an effect compatible with common astronomical observations." 17 Comment: Is it not time to consider retro-reflected starlight from the Biblical crystalline "shell" illuminating non-luminous bodies on the "far side" which are themselves reflected off of that shell http://www.fixedearth.com/Size%20and%20Structure%20VII.htm (Figures 7-10)? Why can’t all this be the "mechanism responsible for the observed redshift and scattering process" that "is compatible with common astronomical observations"?!

***

Quotation: "Another interesting scientific problem for today’s astronomer is the direct observation of surface features on stars. Now, we only have high resolution photographs of the Sun in which we may see spots, prominences, flares.... We do not have comparable photographs of any other stars than our Sun....[!!]18 Comment: All of the fantastic claims of modern cosmology about billions of galaxies and trillions of stars that are millions and billions of light years away from Earth are pure hypothetical hogwash. They can not even resolve the most elemental details of the closest star (which they claim is 24 trillion miles away [1.3 parsecs; 4.1 light years], which claim--you will remember--is based on using the assumed Earth orbit diameter of 186,000,000 miles to make a trigonometric triangle). "Listen" to this:

***

Quotation: "If we tried to observe alpha Centauri, our nearest solar-like star at a distance of 1.3 parsecs, its disk would have a size of 7 milliseconds of arc, almost 270,000 times smaller than the apparent size of the Sun! ...a very big telescope is necessary to resolve the star’s disk, let alone observe star spots on its surface. In fact, to see the surface of alpha Centauri in visible light we would need a telescope with a mirror diameter of 14 meters [c.45 feet], larger than the Keck telescopes in Hawaii. To resolve spots would require a telescope at least 100 times larger than that [c.4500 foot aperture!!]. Such a large telescope is well beyond our present day technology, if we try to construct one using a single mirror...." 19

Comment: Here is a plain admission that there are no ground based telescopes in existence that can see any characteristics whatsoever of even the closest star (which is 23,250 times closer than they say anyway!), and that the technology doesn’t exist to build one 15 football fields wide at the end. Hence, other means to keep the Kabbalist mythology afloat have to be invented...and cost be damned! Here is how this latest multi-billion dollar video game technology for astrophysicists is being played out:

***

Quotation: "...However, it is within our present capability [to see something on the closest star] if we use interferometric techniques. Invented by Albert Michelson in the 19th century [and used repeatedly with results showing no earth orbit!: Ed.], the interferometer makes use of separate telescopes that are widely spaced rather than on a single large mirror.... Most visitors to an optical interferometer will not recognize the array of optical elements as a normal telescope...." 20

Comment: If the "array of optical elements" don’t add up to a "normal telescope" then they must add up to an "abnormal telescope". What is an "abnormal telescope"? What does it tell us? Well...

***

Quotation: "The U.S. Navy [Huh? Why?] has a "prototype Optical Interferometer... outside Flagstaff, Arizona...which combines several small optical telescopes [which are] connected to each other [by vacuum tubes...an unmentioned "abnormality"]....their resolving capability is increased to that of a single 125 foot optical telescope.... But because the telescope lacks a large mirror, it can only see very bright objects, in fact, the human eye can pick out stars that the [interferometer] telescope cannot. [!!].... With conventional telescopes, the stars still really look like points of light. With optical interferometers, of which the Navy type is one, you can begin to see a thickness and a size to these objects....21

Comment: The human eye can pick out stars that this supposed telescopic marvel can not even pick out !! ...but with it you can begin to see a thickness "of these objects".... You figure it out! And these interferometer array abnormal telescopes are the cosmologist’s rage today...with big bucks laid out for construction in several countries around the world and with numerous University Grants.

***

With a reminder to go http://www.fixedearth.com/nasas_hanky-panky.htm for some more very interesting insights into the "abnormalities" involved in the construction and use of computer programmed telescopes (and cameras), and http://www.fixedearth.com/Redshift%20Fraud.htm for more on Redshift and Infrared, let’s shift to another key area of the deception game in the Big Bang drumbeat about the universe being 15 billion years old and 15 billion light years thick:

The Celestial Sphere

Quotation: "The celestial sphere is an imaginary sphere of gigantic radius with the earth located at its center...." 22

Comment: Plain enough....

***

Quotation: "The Celestial Sphere was (and remains) a useful way in which to represent the Universe and, in fact, it is still the way astronomers choose to model the observable sky...." 23

Comment: As these or any other descriptions of the Celestial Sphere plainly show, a model of the universe that has a stationary earth at its center works just fine for all purposes, "and, in fact, is still the way astronomers choose to model the observable sky...." That’s interesting, isn’t it? But on the heels of all such plain admissions comes the cautionary note to any reader who might be so thickheaded as to ask why the model that works and is used is not the true model! For example, on the same page with the first quotation, we read: Q: "Because of the Earth’s yearly orbital motion, the Sun appears to circle the ecliptic." 24 The warning following the second quotation is equally stern: Q: "Hmmm, but wait a minute. Physically the model does not make sense as we know that the Earth is not stationary...." 25 The fact is that both warnings are lies; there is no proof of the Earth yearly orbiting the sun, and there is no proof that the Earth is rotating.

Positional Astronomy Library

Quotation: "SLALIB is a library used by writers of positional-astronomy applications. Most of the 185 routines [helio-based, big bang paradigm] are concerned with astronomical position and time, but a number have wider trigonometrical [i.e., "distance"] ...applications." 26

Comment: Basically, it seems that the bulk of all computer software for modern cosmology utilizes this service or a similar one. Except for a few geocentric coordinates where they can’t be avoided, all routines are based on a rotating, orbiting earth...as are the spurious Besselian trigonometric distance benchmarks.

***

Quotation: SLALIB has "...no routines for calculating physical ephemerides [positions] of Solar-System bodies." 27

Comment: I take this to mean that all the "routines" including "astrometry" (distance measuring) that are provided for computer programmers are designed solely for deep, deep space cosmology, and that all such routines assume an orbiting earth and a universe that is billions of light years thick. Many Q: "individual experts have written their own software already" we are informed. 28 Whoever does it, the point is that all of today’s cosmological applications routinely promote a universe--with billions of galaxies and trillions upon trillions of stars--that is already 15 billion light years thick and growing. This whole foundation is built on sand, i.e., the sand of a mythological moving earth and the sand of the false religious "creation scenario" of Kabbalism.

Infrared Astronomy

Quotation: "Infrared astronomy is the study of celestial objects by means of the infrared radiation they emit, in the wavelength range from about 1 micrometer to about 1 millimeter. All objects, from trees and buildings on the earth to distant galaxies, emit infrared (IR) radiation.... Most of the energy radiated by objects ranging from interstellar matter to planets lies in the IR wavelengths; IR observations are therefore significant in studying asteroids, comets, planetary satellites, and interstellar dust clouds where stars are forming. Finally, because the expansion of the universe shifts energy to longer wavelengths, most of the visible radiation emitted by stars and galaxies during the early stages of the formation of the universe is now shifted to the IR range; studies of the most distant objects in the IR spectrum are necessary if astronomers are to understand how the universe was formed.... COBE [Cosmic Background Explorer] detected small temperature variations in the cosmic microwave background radiation that provided vital clues to the nature of the early universe and its evolution since the ‘big bang’...." 29

Comment: Here is a prime example of a technology with a proven utility on earth being used to further the big bang paradigm where it is incapable of proving anything without claiming easily falsified and programmed "small temperature variations" http://www.fixedearth.com/Redshift%20Fraud.htm (pp. 11,12), etc. Does anyone think that only greedy corporate CEO’s from Enron, etc., "cook their books"? The Space "Science" Establishment has more to loose than any 50 giant corporations in the world, and they will do anything to keep the Kabbalic Universe Mythology alive. Speaking of "cooking the books"--an Accountants jargon for crooked bookkeeping"--connect these dots....

***

Quotation: "The Cookbook Camera is a CCD camera which I built [and used with] a 16-inch, f/4.5 Newtonian Reflector telescope.... Color images on this page [spiral galaxy and halo nebulae] have been produced by using one of two methods. Most of the color images were obtained using cyan, magenta, and yellow filters.... This method...combines a series of exposures through each of the colored filters... The second method...combines a white (no-filter) luminance image with a series of exposures through red, green, and blue filters to provide chrominance.... 30

Comment: And you thought all those pretty color pictures of planets and galaxies and nebulae, on your Telly and in books and magazines, etc., were the real thing??

***

Quotation: "Astroart 3.0 is a complete software for image processing, photometric astrometry, CCD control and image stacking for CCD and film imaging. Advanced filters: Maximum entropy deconvolution [i.e., the freedom to apply any number to explain complicated things they can’t understand]; Image stacking: Automatic on sets of images, pixel precision....Alignment and rotation...automatic processing...color maximum entropy performs more iteration time; up to 4x faster than other software [i.e., "more iteration time" refers to the measure of the frequency of an occurring event within a system (universe) and the assignment of any probability of distribution in the universe.]31

Comment: All functions are premised on a heliocentric "solar" system and an expanding universe paradigm, of course. "Gee whiz" gimmicks will help you play the game more efficiently and make it more fun.... just don’t ever wonder where the facts are that make this a "science" exercise and not just a computer game with a hidden indoctrination facilitator that is far more clever than any of the announced features. You might want to learn Q: "How to enhance dust halos in high resolution CCD Images of Comet C/1995 01" by going to this webpage: 32 Or, you might want to learn about Q: "The KISS Principle in CCD Imaging", or, "how many interesting images can you make with ridiculously simple equipment?".(where you can also learn to "deconvolute", i.e., remove or separate any complications that arise). 33 Or, you might want to Q: "create a sort of unsharp mask...: this will softly blur the image".34 Hey, I’m not knocking all this and a ton of other "imaging" techniques for real and imagined objects in space. It’s called "Astroart" after all, and these are artists adding a little zip and dash and color to the sport. Just remember, it is artwork that enhances a certain religion’s concept of the universe, nothing more and nothing less.

Mass - Luminosity - Magnitude - Distance

Quotation: "Physically, Polaris is a very massive star of the ‘F’ (bright yellow) classification. It is particularly notable as being one of the nearest Cepheid variables to Earth.... This is important because Polaris’ four-day cycle of swelling and contraction is directly related to its mass, which is in turn related to its luminosity. This means that we can calculate the star’s absolute magnitude with some certainty, and comparing this with its observed apparent magnitude, we can compute its distance...which is just over 431 light years. 35a

Comment: Let’s see.... "431 light years".... That is roughly 2,500,000,000,000,000 miles [two quadrillion, five hundred trillion miles...or about twenty eight trillion times as far away as the Sun...(and this is one of the "nearby stars" in the current cosmological video game!)]. Now, we’ve seen it admitted that telescopes simply have not been able to resolve [i.e., show any detail] about any star. They are just "points of light" no matter what they try, and that is the bottom line. But note the alleged known detail involving "variables" and how this allegedly determines mass...which is then connected to its luminosity which, in turn, allows a calculation of the star’s absolute magnitude which can then be compared with its apparent magnitude and viola!...we get a distance of "just over" two quadrillion, five-hundred trillion miles! Along with TIME, "DISTANCE" is the name of the game, folks. It’s the heartbeat of the Big Bang Kabbalic Kosmos. But this stuff is a joke! "Cepheid variables", my foot! "...four day cycle of swelling and contraction"...give us a break! They can’t even get an honest angular measurement, but they can theorize all the mass, luminosity, absolute and apparent magnitude, and swelling and contraction and arrive at a distance that is "just over" 431 light years...not "about 400 or 425 or even 430, but "just over" 431! [This kind of aura of "scientific exactitude" is always a dead giveaway of a cover-up for deception. The same false science arrogance has always been evident in age claims by evolutionists. One example of hundreds: "For 167 million years dinosaurs dominated the world of the beast and then mysteriously vanished from the earth. 35b The Earth--along with the sun and planets--is said to be going around the Milky Way Galaxy at about 500,000 MPH. How long does it take to go around once? This source says 200-230 million years. 36 This source says 225 million years. 37 This one says 250, million years. 38 That’s a range of 50,000,000 years! And there is zero hard evidence that we are moving at all! Liar, liar; you’re pants are on fire!]

***

Apparent Magnitude & Absolute Magnitude

Quotation: "To a great extent, the brightness of objects in the sky depends on their position [distance from Earth] in space. Sirius is the brightest star in the sky, but it is a dwarf star, and not particularly luminous in stellar terms [in dictionary terms brightness and luminous are the same] - it appears brilliant because it is less than nine light years [c.50 trillion miles] away. By comparison, the star Deneb in Cygnus appears much fainter than Sirius in the sky, but is actually a supergiant thousands of times more luminous than Sirius - it appears fainter because it is more than three thousand light years [c.18 quadrillion miles] away. For this reason, the brightness of objects as they appear in the sky is properly referred to as their apparent magnitude [i.e., what you can actually see and measure]. A separate scale exists [oh boy!] - absolute magnitude - to describe the intrinsic brightness [the one made up from jerking spectrum technology around to get it on the Kabbalic distance scale] of an object, irrespective of the location of its observer...." [a meaningless statement...how many options does an observer really have??]. 39

Comment: We have just witnessed a massive hornswoggle that is a major part of this Orwellian doublespeak concerning a given star’s magnitude...and ultimately its distance. Let’s see how that "separate scale" for "Absolute Magnitude" is derived:

***

Quotation: "A means of describing the intrinsic brightness of a star or other object: the effect of distance on the object’s magnitude is eliminated by calculating its brightness as if it lay a fixed distance of ten parsecs (about 33 light years) from the Sun. 40

Comment: Whoa! Can’t we all see how this calculation of the brightness based on a fixed distance for all stars gives a carte blanche license to assign any size and distance to every point of light seen or imagined beyond that fixed distance??! THIS IS A MAJOR KEY TO UNDERSTANDING HOW A 15 BILLION LIGHT YEAR THICK UNIVERSE WITH BILLIONS OF GALAXIES FULL OF ALL SIZES OF STARS HAS BEEN CREATED BY A FALSE SCIENCE ESTABLISHMENT. After all, 99.99% of all the stars claimed in the Big Bang Kabbalic universe are said to exist at distances of hundreds and thousands and millions and billions of light years beyond this fixed distance marker--33 light years--for the calculation of brightness. Absolute Magnitude is an Absolute Joke, and the joke is on all of us! [Furthermore, when we recall that the Besselian parsecs are derived from an unproved earth orbit model providing a mythical 186,000,000 mile baseline for an angle to a "nearby star", we realize that even the 33 light year distance marker is part of the joke, and that the foundation for all "this joke is on you" levity goes back to the one---now if you’ve heard this one, stop me--about how the Earth rotates on an axis and orbits the sun.... ] Actually, every bit of the high sounding pseudo-science that has been stuffed into the Kabbalic Paradigm by their ad hoc formulas, mathematical fumididdles, and technology manipulation, can be explained simply and adequately in the light of all that is known. That is to say that it all can be explained by the Biblical Geocentrism Model of a universe that is less than one light day thick with the stars stars circling the Earth nightly http://www.fixedearth.com/Size_and_Structure%20Part%20IV.htm and being reflected off of a crystalline dome encasing this temporary universe http://www.fixedearth.com/Ssize%20and%20Structure%20Part%20II.htm (p.6) - http://www.fixedearth.com/Size%20and%20Structure%20Part%20I.htm (pp.6.7).

***

Radiation of Light

Quotation: "Commonly, radiation refers to the electromagnetic spectrum, which, in order of decreasing wavelength, includes radio, microwave, infrared, visible-light, ultraviolet, X-ray, and gamma-ray emissions. All of these travel through space at the speed of light (186,000 mi per sec) but differ in wavelength and frequency.... All types of electromagnetic radiation can be reflected and absorbed in the same manner as is visible light...." 41

Comment: The only certain point here is that "All types of electromagnetic radiation can be reflected and absorbed in the same manner as is visible light." This fact can be applied directly to the earth-centered Biblical Model of the Universe wherein starlight is reflected countless times off of a crystalline dome in patterns that are erroneously being attributed to more stars, galaxies, nebulae, etc.

***

Quotation: "...We don’t know exactly what Light is, or what the nature of Light is.... The question of whether Light is a wave or a particle is still being debated." 42

Comment: Obviously this dilemma is reason enough by itself to put all stellar distance dogma over in the science-fiction section part of the library. In spite of all the cocksure news releases to the contrary, Space "science" still doesn’t know what the nature of Light really is nor how their spectral analyses are affected by it.

***

Quotation: "Wave theory, like Darwin’s theory, is a natural theory.... Wave theory is only the beginning of another way to understand the universe.... Wave theory, which like Darwin’s theory is based primarily on the natural sciences shows that everything is subject to change...." 43

Comment: This bias toward the wave theory of light propagation seems to be based on the belief that it supports the evolutionary mind-set behind a Big Bang Kabbalist universe better than the particle theory. The idea that "everything is subject to change" is diametrically opposed to all that is actually known about the universe, and to the Biblical teaching that stability and predictability describe the course of life--everything "after its kind"--the changelessness of the heavens-- attested to by all observational evidence--and the nature of God Himself, for example, Who Is "the same, yesterday, and today, and forever" (Heb.13:8).

***

Quotation: "According to the relativity theory: It is impossible for a particle to have a velocity faster than the velocity of Light in a void.... Einstein considered the last point to be fundamental to the theory of relativity. Recently, a discovery was made that could change the entire theory of relativity. This discovery was that electromagnetic waves can obtain a velocity greater than that of Light.... What is the effect of this? Does this destroy the theory of relativity? There haven’t been very many studies on this yet, and there isn’t much information available, so we still don’t know...." 44

Comment: Again, the fat is in the fire on this one. The only interest here in this ongoing controversy is whether there is a promotion of the wave theory over the particle theory as part of the distance and age figures concocted to advance the Big Bang Kabbalic Agenda. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck....

***

Quotation: "Standard Candles are objects of a given class (e.g., certain types of stars, supernovas, etc.) whose distance is computed by comparing the observed brightness to an assumed absolute luminosity." 45

Comment: Here again is a major distance computation based on a totally assumed Absolute Luminosity which--as we saw earlier--is pre-set for any stars beyond an already phony 33 light years. As noted, at least 99.99% of all the alleged trillions times trillions of stars in the Big Bang Universe are claimed to be hundreds, thousands, millions, and billions of light years distant from Earth. That means that essentially all "standard candle" distance figures have no basis in reality.

***

The Drake Equation

Quotation: "The famous Drake Equation gives the number of intelligent civilizations able to communicate within our own galaxy> N=R*fs*fp*ne*f1*f1*fc*L<". 46

Comment: Drake partnered with Sagan in concocting this perfect example of a pseudo-scientific equation for arriving at "the number of intelligent civilizations able to communicate within our own galaxy".

***

Quotation: "In this equation, the number of advanced technical civilizations N is assumed by multiplying the following variables: N = 250 billion (number of stars in the Milky Way Galaxy)***fp = 1/4 (fraction of stars that have planetary systems)***ne = 2 (number of planets in a given system that are ecologically suitable for life)***f1 = 1/2 (fraction of otherwise suitable planets on which life actually arises)***f1 = 1/10 (fraction of inhabited planets on which an intelligent form of life evolves)***fc = 1/10 (fraction of planets inhabited by intelligent beings on which a communicative technical civilization develops)***fL = 1/100 (fraction of a planetary lifetime graced by a technical civilization)***N = 6 million (approximately)." 47 Comment: SETI (Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence) is something you hear about quite a little bit. One example: Lieutenant "Bud" on the popular "JAG" TV series is an avid promoter of SETI on the program, as was made plain in a segment I saw a couple of night’s ago. Operating under [Quote]: "The Planetary Society" (of which Dr. Carl Sagan was the first president)... " is a non-profit, tax-exempt membership organization (100,000 dues paying members) dedicated to the exploration of the solar system and the search for extraterrestrial life". The Drake Equation.. "was developed by Carl Sagan and Frank Drake at Cornell University."48 At the formative meeting at Green Bank in 1961... Q: "conference members concluded that the number of communicating planets could range from fewer than 1000 to more than a billion. Most of them thought the higher number a more likely estimate. ."...they called for a vigorous radio search for extraterrestrial intelligence, using very large computers, and patience to search for at least 30 years" 49 [That was well over 40 years ago and the Search has found absolutely nothing, nada, goose egg. Sagan--who is often quoted from the first line in his book Cosmos which was based on the blockbuster TV series by the same name (‘The Cosmos is all that is or ever was or ever will be’)--also himself admitted before he died in ’96 that of his NASA supported [and taxpayer funded] missions: Q: "None of these [spacecraft] encounters has yielded compelling, or even strongly suggestive, indications of extraterrestrial life." 50

***

Quotation: "SCIENTISTS WIDEN THE HUNT FOR ALIEN LIFE...Dumb or brainy, fair or hideous, extraterrestrial life forms are often pictured by scientists and writers of science fiction [the perfect oxymoron!] as inhabiting worlds just the right distance from stars--neither too hot nor too cold.... But a quiet revolution is now challenging this view and shaking the foundations of exobiology, the study of the possibility of life elsewhere in the cosmos [i.e., a "science" with no data whatsoever!]. Alien life, the new thinking goes, might not actually need the warming rays of a nearby star. It might thrive inside dim moons and planets.... Now scientists wonder whether similar environments [to the Earth’s] elsewhere in the universe are home to alien microbial hordes and, in some cases, to large beasts and beings higher up the extraterrestrial food chain. This change in thinking drives the excitement over Mars and Europa, a large moon of Jupiter.... Scientists also speculate that the interiors of up to ten bodies in the solar system may harbor extraterrestrial forms of life.... ‘We’re in a paradigm shift’, Dr. Frank D. Drake, a pioneer in the scientific hunt for extraterrestrials, said in an interview." 51

Comment: You will recognize "Dr. Drake" from the "famous Drake Equation", who, along with Dr. Sagan and other excited Planetary Society members settled on "scientifically" finding within 30 years about six million planets within the Milky Way alone where we could expect to discover highly evolved "extraterrestrials" playing a comparable version of Rachmananov’s Second Piano Concerto and going about in at least 1932 model Stutz Bearcats...and quite possibly some in "flying saucers". Alas, the Search has produced nothing--except a lot of hot air hype and pleas for more billions for funny telescopes, etc.--and the deadline is long past. Thankfully, no new "Drake Equation" seems to be in evidence for the latest excitement and expectations of finding microbes and large beasts and...who knows, maybe some chimpanzees riding scooters in Q: "subsurface environments" on "Mars, Europa and extrasolar planets". 52 Drake is not without support in this new "paradigm shift" that was launched--interestingly--just months after Dr. Sagan died without the first piece of evidence for his Milky Way paradigm. Indeed:

***

Quotation: "The tumult [over the paradigm shift] is changing not only mind-sets but also exploratory plans. [Whoa!] The National Science Foundation, the government’s main source of financing for basic science [basic what?] recently started a program called Life in Extreme Environments...and NASA is revamping its whole approach to alien hunts...[Did you get that?!] even though experts still debate the likely size of light-based "environments... and Circumstellar Habitable Zones"..... Dr. Gold of Cornell proposed in 1992 that bacteria might be ubiquitous throughout the upper few miles of Earth’s crust...and that ‘Such life may be widely disseminated in the universe...suggesting that the solar system alone might harbor as many as 10 alien biospheres’.... ‘Planets that go through a volcanic phase may routinely spawn life’, says U. of Wash. oceanographer Dr. Delaney... ‘It’s the evolution to the higher forms,’ he added, ‘that may be the unusual event’." 53

Comment: There is still more than enough zeal and money to keep up the search for those elusive highly evolved Star Trekian apparitions that former U. S. Pres. Carter (MA physics) and Pope John Paul II et al have sent messages to in the past. After over forty years of abject failure to get any responses or demonstrate one indisputable piece of evidence for extraterrestrial life of any sort, NASA, the NSF and different scientists decided in ‘97 that they had better spread their bets out a bit. Hence, the big excitement over finding ways to get some "bunker buster" probes under the surface of the Moon, Mars, large asteroids, Jupiter, Saturn, a moon of Neptune, and other targets in the "solar" system. In 1992, as we saw, Dr. Gold of Cornell [where Sagan was at that time] stressed Q: "...that bacteria might be ubiquitous throughout the upper few miles of Earth’s crust....and that ‘Such life may be widely disseminated in the universe...." Curiously, Dr. Chandra Wickramasinghe and Sir Fred Hoyle were articulating the bacteria theory widely at least four years before Gold wrote about it! Wickramasinghe in particular had already launched his and Hoyle’s "Panspermia" concept of how evolution began on Earth (and all over the universe) with bacteria being pooped out from passing comets during those always assumed billions of years. He said flatly that the Darwinian Model was incapable of explaining how evolution began on Earth or could crank it up anywhere else, and that comets nurturing bacteria in their wombs have been whooshing around the universe for billions of years seeding the earth and millions of other alleged planets...and this is the way all life really began, by golly. Don’t laugh! Comets pukeing out bacteria is the new savior of biological evolutionary mythology; "Panspermia" is now the unholy grail http://www.fixedearth.com/theoretical%20sci.Part%20I.htm It looks to me like Dr. Gold--realizing that Darwinism is incapable of explaining life’s beginnings--tuned in on Wickramasinghe’s frequency as the wave of the future for biological evolutionism, and he and all the other excited folks have got The National Science Foundation putting up the big (taxpayer) bucks and NASA supplying the exobiologists (scientists with no data) and the launch pads. "Bunker buster" designs for plowing through the surface of those planets and moons and coming up with at least some bacteria are already built and headed for a Martian moon. And, of course, these probes wouldn’t take with them the bacteria they are going to find. Nah...how could you even suggest....Perish the thought!

***

Further Comment: NASA’s pre-programmed software for its computerized telescopes and cameras http://www.fixedearth.com/nasas_hanky-panky.htm -- both land based and on space vehicles -- is a ready-made setup for fraud in pursuit of its goal to present the world with "confirmation" of evolving life in outer space. That stated goal: "to find our cosmic roots" is the heart of NASA’s "Origins Program" and no lie is too big to bring it to pass. Does anyone have the remotest doubt that the pre-programmed software in those telescopes and cameras is 100% locked into the "math" based on an orbiting earth and all of the fanciful fabrications of distances that we’ve seen up to now?? Don’t we all know that whoever controls the programming of computer software controls the results the computer gives?? Star distance garbage in, star distance garbage out!! Pure and simple.... Nobody talks about this with NASA officials...nor the whole evolutionary mind-set controlling the Kabbalist Space Agenda, but the possibilities for establishing a lie with computer software and totally fooling people with the result is a well known capability. All that is required is motive and the means to pull it off. The whole Kabbalist Kosmology Agenda has both! Here is a quick, clear, current, and important illustration of how computer software can establish a lie as the truth and fool people into thinking they are witnessing a wonderful marvel of technology at work:

Quotation: "Bob Urosevich heads Ohio-based Diebold Election Systems Inc. (DESI). His brother Todd is a vice-president at a competing company, Omaha-based Elections Systems & Software. These two companies count nearly 80 percent of the votes cast in the United States.... Aviel D. Rubin, an associate professor of computer science at Johns Hopkins and technical advisor of ISI, [issued] a 24-page report, "Analysis of an Electronic Voting System...released on July 23.... ‘The most fundamental problem with such a voting system is that the entire election hinges on the correctness, robustness, and security of the software within the voting terminal....’"54

Comment: The same concept applies precisely to the software in the computer programmed telescopes and cameras which have all but established the Copernican-based Big Bang Kabbalic Universe as "scientific virtual reality" http://www.fixedearth.com/Virtual%20Reality%20Fraud.htm Writing in their book (VoteScam) on the power of fraudulent use of pre-programmed computer software in voting machines, James and Kenneth Collier concluded: "The concept is clear, simple, and it works. Computerized voting gives the power of selection, without fear of discovery, to whomever controls the computer."55 Apply that fact to the Virtual Reality Universe created by the Kabbalist controlled Space Program and you will begin to see how far God has allowed high-tech fraud to go before He exposes it and the world-controlling evolutionary mind-set which undergirds all of modern man’s "knowledge" (HERE).

***

Quotation: "Based at the University of California, Berkeley, SETI [Search For Extraterrestrial Intelligence] has recruited more that 4 million volunteers around the world...to scan the galaxies for space aliens. The volunteers download a screensaver that lets SETI access their computers when they’re not using them to help process the massive amount of data collected by the world’s largest radio telescope in Arecibo, Puerto Rico. Harnessing all that computer power and getting those processors to crunch data on a single project is what’s called distributed computing, or data harvesting.... Using special software that activates when the computer processor has been idle for a while, a PC set up for distributed use can wake up and do something positive--like looking for signals from outer space for SETI...." 56

Comment: Excuse me! Something productive?! After more than 40 years and who knows how many billions of dollars and endless movie, TV, and written media hype, there has not been the first burp from space on the screen. Nothing. Zero. Nichts. The only payoff--and it’s a big one!--is the steady boost in the religious stock of Kabbalic Evolutionism, Inc., which is listed as "Space Science" on the Big Board. And now they’ve got four million extra computers tithing their time and electricity to serve that religion’s "Origins Program" propaganda machine and bring in more converts! What a deal already! Try doing something comparable for the Biblical Model of the Universe with taxpayer money and see how far you get! But for the Kabbalic Model the vault is open and all media is at your disposal.... Verily:

Quotation: "...modern cosmology has become nothing but a morass of conflicting mathematical models.... Why should we pay any attention to these cosmological speculations? No one outside this professional clique of specialists in higher mathematics and theoretical physics can really understand them--especially when they disagree with each other and repeatedly revise their theories anyway....57

***

This is probably as good a place as any to shut down on these quotes which basically usher modern cosmology and all that is built on it over to the fiction stacks in the library. It is tempting to go on for another 15 or 20 pages with Big Bang Bashing quotes, but this should be enough to do the job.

Maybe later...if more is called for....

***

From Part I in this Series on "The Size and Structure of the Universe According to the Bible and Non-Theoretical Science" to this point at the end of Part VI, the evidence reveals that modern cosmology’s 15 billion year old and 15 billion light year thick universe takes the prize as the Blue Ribbon deception in all of recorded history. From its Copernican foundation to the latest "paradigm shift" there is not one single fact to be found in the entire knowledge-controlling concept. Not one.

By way of contrast, the Biblical Model of the size and structure of the universe based on a non-moving Earth at its center accommodates every aspect of what is actually known.

Go to Part VII http://www.fixedearth.com/Size%20and%20Structure%20VII.htm to see: a) What the unmasking of this crowning deception masquerading as "science" means for everyone on Earth; b) Several illustrations promised in Part I which show the simplicity, clarity, beauty, and observed reality of our Biblically described temporary universe of less than one day’s thickness....

***

BIBLIOGRAPHY

1 - "The Optical Interferometer: Completing the Work of Galileo", by Tyler Nordgren; http://www.nofs.navy.mil/projects/npoi/science/diam.htm, accessed: 5-14-03, p.2 of 5

2 - Ibid.

3 - "Redshift": Setterfield, http://www.setterfield.org/redshift.htm, 5-3-03, p. 2 of 21

4 - "Ask the Astronomer", Dr. Sten Odenwald; http://itss.raytheon.com/cafe/quadir/oops.html;

accessed: 2 -9-03, p. 1 of 2

5 - "Goliath Telescope..." , Tariq Malik, http://www.space.com/businesstechnology/technology/

owl_telescope-0207204. html, 7-24-02, pp. 1-3

6 - NASA - Space Science, http://spacescience.nasa.gov/, accessed: 5-8-03, p. 1 of 1

7 - "JPL News Release - Galaxy Evolution Explorer Mission Status", http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/releases/2003/69.cfm, 5-6-03, p. 1 of 2

8 - "ESO - An Introduction to Active and Adaptive Optics", http://eso.org/projects/aot/introduction.html, accessed: 6-11-03, pp. 1 & 2

9 - Back to Genesis, "The Outer Darkness", Henry M. Morris, Oct., ‘01, p. a, Quoting: Ron Cowen, "A Dark Force In The Universe", Science News, vol, 159, Apr. 7, 01, p. 218

10 -Ibid., p. b

11 -Back to Genesis, "What Astronomers Don’t Know", Henry M. Morris, July, 02, p. b, Quoting: Brad Lemley, "Guth’s Grand Guess", Discover (vol. 23, Apr. ‘02), p. 38

12 -Op. cit., Back to Genesis, "What Astronomers Don’t Know", HMM, July ‘02, p. c

13 -The Biblical Astronomer, vol. 12, #99, Winter 2002, Ed. Gerardus D. Bouw. Ph.D., "A Small Spherical Universe After All?", pp. 38,39

14 -"Redshift", http://www.astro.virginia.edu/~jh8h/glossary/redshift.htm, accessed: 6-12-03, p. 1

15 - "A New Non-Doppler Redshift", Paul Marmet, update of Physics Essays, 1988, Herzberg Institute of Astrophysics, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A OR6, http://www.newtonphysics.on.ca/ HUBBLE/Hubblehtml, accessed: 6-12-03, p. 1 of 20

16 -Op. cit., "Redshift", astro.virginia.edu

17 -Op. cit., "A New Non-Doppler..."

18 -"Why Use An Interferometer?", cartoons by: Tyler Nordgren, http://www.nofs.navy.mil/

projects/npoi/whynpoi.htm, accessed; 5-14-03, p. 3 of 5

19 -Ibid.

20 -Ibid., p. 4

21 -"Massive North Star Polaris Surprises Scientists", http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/ astronomy/polaris_size_000614html, accessed: 5-14-03, p. 2 of 3

22 -"The Celestial Sphere", http://astrosun.tn.cornell.edu/courses/astro201/cel_sphere.htm, accessed: 3-10-03, p. 1 of 2

23 -"Celestial Sphere", http://zobu.uoregon.edu/~imamura/121/sep29/motions.html, accessed: 3-10-03, p. 1 of 2

24 -Ibid.

25 -Ibid.

26 -SLALIB--Positional Astronomy Library, P.T. Wallace, http://star-www.rl.ac.uk/star/docs/ sun67.htx/nodel.html, 9-6-01, p. 1 of 1

27 -Op. cit., SLALIB, "Objectives", p. 1 of 2

28 -Op. cit., SLALIB, "New Functions", p. 1 of 1

29 -"Infrared Astronomy", Infoplease.com, accessed: 5-15-03, pp. 1 of 2

30 -Jeff MacQuarrie’s "Astronomy CCD Images", http://members.aol.com/_ht_alccdastronomy/ ccdimage.htm?mtbrand=AOL_us, accessed: 5-17-03, p. 1 of 7

31 -Astroart - Image Processing Software, http://www.msb-astroart.com, 4-9-03, p. 1 of 1

32 -Astroart in LAB home page, M. Nicolini, http://chilioiolist/mnico//abindex.htm, accessed: 5-17-03, p. 1 of 1

33 -"The KISS Principle in CCD Imaging", http://wvi.com/~rberry/imaging/kissprinciple.htm, accessed: 5-17-03, p. 1 of 11

34 -Astroart in LAB #1, "How To Enhance Dust Halos...", M. Nicolini, http://chili.iol.it/lab/ tut_en1.htm, accessed: 5-17-03, p. 1 of 3

35a-eSky-Polaris, http://www.glyphweb.com/esky/stars/polaris.html, accessed: 10-13-03, p. 1 of 1

35b-"The World Too Fast For Dino?", The Miami Herald, 9-14-72, p. 18L

36 -"Milky Way", Infoplease.com, accessed: 5-15-03, p. 1 of 1

37 -"Your Sky Help: Proper Motion", http://www.fourmilab;.ch/yoursky/help/proper.html, accessed: 3-10-03, p. 1 of 3

38 -"Milky Way Galaxy", Eric Weisstein, http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/astronomy/ MilkyWayGalaxy.html, accessed: 1-10-03, p. 1 of 1

39 -eSky: "Magnitude", www.glyphweb.com/esky/concepts/magnitude.html, accessed: 6-12-03, p. 1 of 1

40 -eSky: "Absolute Magnitude", www.glyphwebcom/esky/concepts/absolutemagnitude. html, accessed: 6-12-03, p. 1 of 1

41 -"Radiation", Infoplease.com, http://www.infoplease.com/ce6/sci/A0840916.html, accessed: 5-15-03, p. 1 of 2

42 -The Optics - Quantum Optics - "LIght: Wave or Particle", http://library.thinkquest.org/ C003776/chino/course/wave_or_particle.htm, accessed:7-6-03, p. 1 of 1

43 -"Grand Unified Wave Theory: Wave Theory - The Speed of Light", (con’t. p.7), Dr. Chaim H. Tejman, http://www.grandunifiedtheory.org.il/speed7.htm, accessed: 4-27-03, p. 1 of 2

44 -The Optics - Quantum Optics - "Particles Faster Than Light?", http://thinkquest.org/C003776/ chino/course/faster_particles.htm, p. 1 of 2

45 -"Standard Candle", Eric Weisstein, http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/astronomy/

StandardCandle.html, accessed: 1-10-03, p. 1 of 1

46 -Drake Equation Page - "The Drake Equation", http://www.seds.org/~rme/drake, html, accessed: 6-7-03, p. 1 of 4

47 -Stargazer Online// Carl Sagan; "Carl Sagan: The People’s Astronomer", by Richard Bell, accessed: 6-7-03, pp. 3, 4

48 -Ibid., pp. 1, 2

49 -The Planetary Society: SETI Page, "The Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence: A Short History", by Amir Alexander, http://planetary.org/html/UPDATES/seti/history/History07, htm, accessed: 6-7-03, p. 3 of 4

50 -"The Search for Extraterrestrial Life", Carl Sagan, Scientific American (‘94)....

51 -"Scientists Widen the Hunt for Alien Life", by William J. Broad, http://www.samsloan.com/ aliens.htm, 5-6-97, p. 1 of 4

52 -Ibid., pp. 1, 2

53 -Ibid., pp. 3 4

54 -"Analysis of an Electronic Voting System", Aviel D. Rubins, [DESI/ISI squabble has apparently removed this message from the internet...]

55 -Ibid.

56 -"NASA’s Hight Tech Trick Helps Auto Researchers", by Mike Wendland, http://www.freep.com, 4-21-03, pp. 1,2

57 -"The Uncertain Speed of Light", Henry M. Morris, Back to Genesis, June, 2003, p. c

Link to this webpage: http://www.fixedearth.com/Size%20and%20Structure%20Part%20VI.htm

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Size and Structure of the Universe - According To the Bible and Non-Theoretical Science
Part VII - A Clear and Unavoidable Choice

Between the Biblical and the Kabbalist Creationist Models

Looms for One and All

Laughing at one’s self for being taken in by some con artist can be a little hard to do at first. First one just feels kind of dumb or angry, and hopes not too many people noticed. Then maybe a "I’ll show you, you s/zx(*^!>"... reaction kicks in for a while. Finally, depending on the magnitude of the rip-off and the inability or unwillingness to seek restitution or vengeance, one may begin to chortle just a little at what a sap they’ve been. If other friends and acquaintances have been just as big suckers as you about the same scam, the climate for some knee-slapping, bent-over-double guffawing amongst said suckers may take over...and may be the best therapy possible.

For example, when something as big as the Y2K scam comes down the pike, the potential for acres of people laughing at themselves is very high indeed. Convincing books were written, General Motors allocated $600,000,000 to try to avoid the alleged looming disaster to the world’s computers; Ford spent $400,000,000. The British Government printed an extra Fifty Billion Pounds against a possible run on the banks. The U. S. Government likewise printed an extra Two Hundred Billion Dollars for the same reason. Many millions and thousands and hundreds were spent by other corporations and small businesses and average individuals, including yours truly and spouse who joined in the fun.

Have you ever seen or heard one line of explanation of what happened to that Two Hundred Billion Dollars--and all the rest--that the U. S. Government and the others printed and didn’t use? I haven’t. Would you believe the explanation if you heard one? I wouldn’t. One might just as well laugh--ha, ha--and forget it. It’s gone; and you and I can’t do anything about it. hee, hee, heeeeee....

The Y2K boondoggle was huge, nearly global in its scope. It put a pretty good hurt’n on GM and Ford and the like, and they had no recourse...except to raise prices on their vehicles. Millions of folks who spent hundreds and thousands of dollars, pounds, marks, yen, whatever, to do something to protect their families against the expert prognostications of technological Doomsday due at 12:01 AM 2000 AD had no recourse but to grin and bear it. ha, ha, ha....

But that global bugaboo--combined with all the other scams you can think of... and multiplied by a big number--can not hold a candle to a certain deception so incredible in its scope that it has literally usurped the basis of all Truth in every area of today’s "knowledge" http://www.fixedearth.com/knowledge%20impact.htm And--to make the grapes even more sour--this deception has replaced the key to all Truth with a lie that is so patently absurd on its face that all of us who have fallen for it ought to be so ashamed that we must cry some before we can laugh at our own foolishness. sniff, sniff, ha, ha...

This unspeakably beguiling lie--coming "as an angel of light" with its arcane/occult "science" credentials--has wreaked infinitely greater devastation on humanity than all the plagues and wars and thievery throughout history. With ever-increasing success since the Copernican Revolution laid down the necessary foundation for turning the Earth and Mankind into insignificant cosmic accidents and paved the way for an evolutionary mind-set, this incredible deception is now marching triumphantly over a largely effete and moribund Christianity. Now Christianity--with its only reason for existence, i.e., a Bible of Absolute Truth from a God Who cannot lie--seemingly rendered untrue and obsolete by a "scientific origins scenario" which mocks the Bible’s "creation scenario", the world stands poised to be plunged into a Biblically prophesied high-tech, total surveillance, Satan-worshipping, drug-driven, violent, slaveocracy (Rev. 9:21; 13: 2b-7, 15-18). ha, ha, ha

Where does one begin when trying to show the utter insanity of the evolutionary mind-set?? It is as if the whole world is blinded and herding itself lemming-like into a sea of hopelessness...because there is no hope for mankind in that evolutionary mind-set. Yet the Orwellian nightmare ("1984") has now had more than twenty years to percolate and is just a couple of baby steps away from being able to do just what the Bible says in those verses listed just above. ha, ha, ha

The reaction of individuals caught up in some big deception--especially if they make their living based on its continuance--can create a real dilemma. The Biblical record of the tumult caused by the silversmith craftsmen who made silver shrines for the goddess Diana is a case in point. When the Apostle Paul and some disciples went around Ephesus (which was the seat of the goddess Diana worship) preaching "that they be no gods, which are made with hands", the silversmith Demetrius "called together the workmen of like occupation" and told them "...that not only this our craft is in danger to be set at nought; but also that the temple of the great goddess Diana should be despised and her magnificence should be destroyed, whom all Asia and the world worships. And when they heard these sayings they were full of wrath, and cried out, saying, Great is Diana of the Ephesians. And the whole city was filled with confusion...and all with one voice about the space of two hours [!] cried out, Great is Diana of the Ephesians...." (Acts 19:23 41).

With that clear and understandable example in mind of an ancient localized near riot being set off by a preaching that caused an income related threat, just imagine the reaction if there were to come a preaching which threatened not only millions of incomes globally, but also forcefully impacted every single religious establishment there is as well as the lives of every literate person in the world philosophically and spiritually as well as economically!

What could such a preaching be?! Indeed, is there any one Truth amongst many that God has allowed to be repressed (Acts 15:18) which--if exposed as a lie-- would be capable of causing the exposure of every important religious and secular deception--ALL of them!--in the world today??

YES, THERE IS ONE SUCH TRUTH! Anyone can understand the accuracy of this conclusion by reading these six pages, http://www.fixedearth.com/knowledge%20impact.htm and then reading of the global ramifications throughout this web page. This lie about a rotating and orbiting Earth--innocuous as it may appear to some at first glance--is the necessary foundation for the success of a belief in a "creation scenario" that persuades the world that an evolutionary explanation for the origin of the universe, the Earth, and mankind is "a scientific fact".

That belief, endorsed and relentlessly promoted by a Theoretical Science Establishment through all visual, audio, and print media, has set Bible Credibility--and hence, Bible Christianity--up for an already planned knockout punch. That punch is computer-programmed Virtual Reality-authenticated claims that extraterrestrial evolution has been proven and is now nearly ready to be shown on your telly http://www.fixedearth.com/Virtual%20Reality%20Fraud.htm & http://www.fixedearth.com/nasas_hanky-panky.htm

The message is that this is the final blow to all claims of Biblical Creationism involving a literal six day "creation scenario". It will be compared to a time when people used to believe in the Biblical teaching that the Earth is stationary at the center of a universe small enough for the stars to go around it nightly http://www.fixedearth.com/Size_and_Structure%20Part%20IV.htm The whole world gave up that self-serving belief, we will be reminded, and now "science" is declaring that it is time for all "intelligent" people to give up not only on the Biblical Creation Account, but to realize that the whole Bible--and the Jesus part especially--is all just an ancient fairy tale that has been used to exploit people for centuries and that all such superstitious nonsense is now far removed from our enlightened philosophy of "scientific humanism"....

You get the picture.... (Of course, until the fact began to leak out on the web and in certain books, there was no awareness--in the Gentile world, at least--that this entire Big Bang Origins Paradigm is nothing more and nothing less than the fulfillment of the anti-Bible "creation scenario" of Pharisaic Judaism as set forth by Rabbis in the anti-Christ Kabbala. See the "Kabbala" Series starting http://www.fixedearth.com/kabbala%20I.htm .......

Falsifying and exposing the moving-earth keystone of all this diabolic deception will force a confrontation between all of God’s Truths and all of Satan’s Deceptions, the likes of which only God could have planned and bring to pass (Rev. 17:14-18; Acts 15:18; etc.). Babylon--i. e., "confusion" about the truth on the most elemental knowledge there is, namely, the truth about the Origin of the universe, Earth, and mankind--will collapse completely once the hidden source and utter falsity of the entire evolutionary mind-set from Copernicanism through Darwinism and Saganism and Wickramasingheism http://www.fixedearth.com/theoretical%20sci.Part%20I.htm is in the open for all to see.

Coming on the heels of the establishment of a Biblically promised One World Government (Rev. 17: 12-18; 13: 7,16,17), Babylon’s Fall will leave millions of people face to face with the economic dilemma that the silversmiths in Ephesus encountered. Those men had their very livelihoods threatened by an exposure of the goddess Diana as a false deity, and that is what they resisted with almost comic gusto.

The chief difference between the Truth that threatened the silversmiths in Ephesus and the Truth Blitzkrieg that is to come is that the effect of Babylon’s Fall will not be limited to a corner of Asia Minor, but will be global in its extent (Rev. 18:10-19).

This understanding--and this understanding alone--lines up with 1900 year old plain and clear prophecy in the Bible...as anyone reading this can prove to themselves if they are determined to let the Bible have the last word on any subject that is involved in this entire pivotal question about origins....

Those prophesies tell of a short-lived (Rev. 17:12), Satan empowered (Rev. 17:13; 13:2b,4) World Government (Rev. 13:7) that is forcibly exposed (Rev. 17:14), that comes out of the closet (Rev. 18:2), that draws with it what must be a substantial majority of the world’s populations (Rev. 13:7, 8) who willfully become overt Satan-worshippers (Rev. 13:4) and who--after a couple of years of enduring God’s plagues (Rev. 18:4; Rev. 8:7-13;9:1-12,13-21)--join in a concerted pogrom to convert or wipe out Bible-based Christians (Rev. 13:4,15; 14:9-12)...who obviously have not been raptured! Scripturally, the Rapture cannot occur until the last day of the temporary earth’s history

1: http://www.fixedearth.com/the_bible/rapture.html
2: http://www.fixedearth.com/the_bible/rapturesales.html
3: http://www.fixedearth.com/dandmotf.html
4: http://www.fixedearth.com/retearth.htm

All of the developments related to these events--along with the Scriptural confirmation that is required--is codified in these two short books http://www.fixedearth.com/the_bible/rapturesales.html & http://www.fixedearth.com/the_bible/endtimedramasales.html and fortified in several links on this web page. Whatever one’s current beliefs may be--it is not difficult to see and understand the breath and depth of this one seminal doctrinal deception that has got not only the world but also the churches by the throat... Every bit of this deception will come to light when the Lamb of God (Rev. 17:14) leads His "called, chosen, and faithful" to spotlight the vulnerable Copernican keystone that is upholding Satan’s entire edifice of deceptions...which edifice has become the bedrock--the very cornerstone--of man’s evolution-based "knowledge" today http://www.fixedearth.com/knowledge%20impact.htm

The identification of that keystone as the Copernican moving Earth deception is neither an hypothesis nor a theory that anyone can accept or deny. Like it or not, the proof is there; it is a demonstrated fact. More, it is demonstrable that this fact is a singularly unique and pivotal Truth in God’s arsenal that will not go away but which will accomplish that which He sent it accomplish (Isaiah 55:11), namely four things: 1) The exposure and humiliation of the evolutionary mind-set and all of the Satan-inspired "knowledge" that is dependent upon that incredible myth; 2) The global establishment of the demonstrated fact that the Bible is precisely what it claims to be, i.e., the Word of Absolute Truth on all subjects inspired by the Sovereign God of the Universe who offers and obviously can deliver eternal life on a paradisiacal New Earth to "whosoever will"...; 3) The division of the world’s populations into: a) those who reject and hate the Truths forced on them and align themselves with the overt Satan worshipping faction which is endorsed by a global government (Rev.13:4); b) those who get on God’s side (Rev. 18:4; 13:7); 4) The Fall of Babylon plus the events that follow and are written which cover: a) the Seven time frames of the Seven Trumpet events; b) the "little season"; and: c) the last day of this old earth’s history http://www.fixedearth.com/7th_trumpet.htm

There are multitudes of people who have been indoctrinated with the Darwinian evolutionary lies who do things they wouldn’t do if they knew they had been deceived about the fact of their divine origin and their option for eternal life on a New Earth through Jesus Christ. Another--and apparently two or three times larger multitude--has welcomed the evolutionary indoctrination and will hate its exposure because deception fits their nature, false pride, whatever (John. 8:44-47; II Thess. 2:12).

As for religions--Christianity in particular--the fact is that evolutionary indoctrination and dissemination has placed ALL churches in the anti-Bible camp relevant specifically to the plain non-moving Earth teachings http://www.fixedearth.com/sixty-seven%20references.htm Moreover, most--not all!--of these churches are even more deeply trapped in an anti-Bible mode by their acceptance not only of a Bible-denying rotating and orbiting Earth, but also by their acceptance of the evolution of the Universe, the Earth, and all plant and animal life...including the evolution of humankind itself. The amount of crow that is going to have to be eaten over these two issues alone in the churches is going to going to cause a sharp rise in: a) Sackcloth and ash stock; b) The need for padlocks for doors on willfully Bible-denying churches; c) Major Christian opportunities for those honestly duped--both in the churches and in the world--who "can receive a love of the truth" (II Thess. 2:10) when they find out what it is.

Indeed, as other false doctrines are forced into the glare of resurgent and unyielding Biblical Absolutism caused by the falsification of heliocentricity and evolutionism, the single option that will remain for both clerical and lay Christians will be to drop their present labels and declare total allegiance to proven "precept upon precept, line upon line" Bible doctrines. This is the Final Church, the one without spot or wrinkle... where everyone is of one mind about what is true and what is a lie.

One common label amongst Christians today--i.e., "Theistic Evolutionist"-- will be inadmissible for any who would claim to be followers of God after Babylon has fallen. This diabolic virus--saying God used evolution to create--is basic Kabbalism; it is not Bible. It refutes the Bible on its first page and destroys its credibility as the source of Absolute Truth all the way to its last page. Scores of millions--including the Papacy--have been snared in this web of deceit. Their choices will narrow to three when Babylon Falls, viz., 1) Repent and get on God’s side; 2) Join the Satan worshippers; 3) Get on God’s side for convenience sake (a temporary and doomed 3rd choice [Rev. 14:9-13 or I Thess. 4:16,17]).

Another such label which will be increasingly in evidence as God’s Truth Blitzkrieg brings Babylon down is one that is scarcely if ever uttered, but nevertheless is one that is solidly entrenched in ALL churches; namely, the "Theistic Heliocentrist". Like "Theistic Evolutionist" this diabolic virus refutes the Bible on its first page and continues to do so throughout the Scriptures http://www.fixedearth.com/links/gram_semant.htm & http://www.fixedearth.com/sixty-seven%20references.htm Without this virus the whole Kabbalic Universe could not have been brought to its present stage and the evolutionary mind-set could never have matured and succeeded in its masquerade as "science". Consequently, it could never have gotten this far in its replacement of Bible Creationism and the God and the Plan behind that Creation.

Aside from the secular impact of isolating and eradicating this Copernican godfather of all truth-destroying false science viruses, it is Biblically promised that it is in the Christian Churches where God will begin His Judgment and cleansing by removing all the false science generated doctrinal spots and wrinkles that are dependent upon the Copernican lie of a rotating and orbiting Earth...and the Darwinian and Saganian evolutionism made possible by that lie (I.Pet. 4:17,18;) http://www.fixedearth.com/house%20of%20god.htm

So, face it: There is not the first piece of verifiable proof for a moving earth nor any of the Video Game Cosmology that is built on it. The world has been deceived into adopting the Kabbalist religion’s concept of the origin of all that exists. With his standard "Angel of Light" modus operandi, Satan entered the academic scene all dressed up as "secular science". "Science", we’ve all learned, has no religious ax to grind (like those old superstitious Christians and that remnant of Jews who still look at least to the Old Testament for God’s Truth...and the anti-evolutionist Moslems). No, no.... "Science" sets mankind free from all of that primitive nonsense. ha, ha...

Well, as it turns out, this "science falsely so called" (I Tim. 5:20,21) is the glue that is holding Satan’s Empire together!

That glue is dissolved by the Biblical Model of the Size and Structure of the Universe seen in Parts I through VI and numerous other relevant links on this web page, and by the efforts of other geocentrists now demanding to be heard. Though a billion voices will rise like the Ephesian silversmiths of old to clamor "Great is the Cosmos of the Evolutionary Scientists", that lie and all that rests upon it will be exposed and the entire world will be divided into two camps...God’s and Satan’s... just as the Bible foretold over nineteen centuries ago (Rev. 17:14; 13:4-7).

But now--as promised in Part I--it’s time to look at several annotated schematics which help explain "The Size and Structure of the Universe According to the Bible and Non-Theoretical Science as described in Parts I through VII. Consider:

Figure I

The Size and Structure of the Universe

According to the Bible and Non-Theoretical Science

Explanation - Figure I

Figure I shows a schematic of the size of our Biblically mandated universe.

This size easily accommodates all that non-theoretical science actually knows.

The sizes allotted to the Biblical divisions from the Earth to the Dome illustrate the fact that the

diameter of the universe needs to be no more than one light day.

Figure II

Figure III

Figure IV

Figure V

Explanation - Figure II

As described in Essays I, II, and III, the light from each star

seen on the earth also travels to the reflective Crystalline

underside of the Biblically mandated Dome encasing the Universe.

Explanation - Figure III

Light from the Biblically Numbered and Named Stars is reflectively dispersed

off of the precisely configured crystals embedded in the universal canopy. These

numberless reflections go back into the Stellatum where they are seen and counted

as billions of galaxies and endless numbers of stars...and where redshift and other technology

is used fraudulently to fit the phenomena into the requirements of the fifteen billion light year thick

Kabbalic Big Bang Origins Scenario.

Explanation - Figure IV

Reflected starlight from the Crystalline Shell illuminates non-luminous bodies in space on their reverse faces (from Earth). Thus illuminated, their luminescence is retro-reflected back off of the Crystalline Dome into the Stellatum. These weaker retro-reflections readily account for more hypothesized billions of galaxies and billions of light year distances now "explained" by: a) The Besselian Assumption which immediately puts stars 23,250 times further away than is known (Part V, HERE, pp. 5-7); b) The Redshift and Infrared voodooism (HERE); and, c) The distance calculations based on the "Absolute Magnitude" chicanery which raises chutzpah in astronomy to new heights (Part VI, pp. 11-13 -HERE).

Explanation - Figure V

The same principle as in Figure IV causes other non-luminous matter (e.g., dust clouds) to be illuminated on the far side (from Earth) by reflected starlight which in turn is retro-reflected back to the Crystalline Dome...where it is again reflected into the Stellatum. This light-scattering mechanism provides a ready explanation for the imaginative simulations of nebulae which show an indirect lighting affect on the far side. This reflective and retro-reflective mechanism--precisely guiding starlight refraction off of a Crystalline Dome--effectively reduces the thickness of the universe from its presently claimed fifteen billion light years...to less than one ten trillionth of that mythological distance (and quite possibly smaller than that...when time permits scrutiny of the highly suspicious distance claims even within the "solar" system....).

***

Readers of this series may remember these two Explanations of "The Celestial Sphere" from Part VI:

1) "The Celestial Sphere is an imaginary sphere of gigantic radius with the earth located at its center." 1 (http://astrosun.tn.cornell.edu/courses/astro201/cel_sphere.htm)

2) "The Celestial Sphere was (and remains) a useful way to represent the universe and, in fact, is still the way astronomers choose to model the observable sky." 2 (http://zebu.uoregon.edu/~imamura/121/sep29/motions.html)

Figure VI (below) is a standard representation of "The Celestial Sphere",

Figure VI

The Celestial Sphere

Figure VII

The Biblical Universe Superimposed Onto

the Astronomer’s Standard Celestial Sphere

Explanation - Figure VII

By Superimposing The Biblical Universe Onto

the Astronomer’s Standard Earth-centered Celestial Sphere

one can immediately see how simple and scientifically

friendly our "small" Universe really is...

and how totally confusing, assumption based, and unnecessary

the Kabbalic Big Bang Paradigm

of the Universe really is....

***

So...with a scientifically sustainable and Biblically certified "Small Universe Model"--now demonstrated and accessible throughout this Series--the necessity of choosing between the controlling Kabbalist Model of the Universe and the Biblical Model of the Universe begs for a decision from those who understand the mega- importance of this issue because Truth about the Origin of everything is at stake.

The understanding that should be clear by now to readers of this web page is that there is a spiritual line drawn in the sand over this whole issue and everybody in the world is directly affected by their belief in how they themselves and everything that exists came to be. All knowledge that shapes a person’s life begins and remains with what they believe about the Origin of life and everything else (e.g., HERE). The Biblical Model of a young, small Universe with a stationary Earth at the center that was once on the other side of that spiritual line in the sand has long been abandoned...even by churches with Bibles on their podiums which confirm that Model repeatedly (HERE - HERE).

Thus, even the scores of millions of people who totally reject the evolutionary explanation of Origins--but continue to believe in a rotating, orbiting Earth--have been tricked and are stuck with a belief in the Kabbalic Universe which is the mother of all modern day evolutionism...the very concept they totally reject!! (Even those God has chosen for Himself [the "elect] can be deceived: Mark 13:22!)

Try looking at it this way: Without a universe billions of years old there would be no TIME for evolution to occur. Right?? I mean, TIME IS THE HERO OF THE EVOLUTION PLOT, and, guess what?- The Kabbalic Model of the Universe has given evolutionists those billions of years that are absolutely necessary to carrying out and completing the plot because Copernicanism makes that Model possible!

In short: The Kabbalist Model demands: a) Acceptance of a universe that has been evolving for 15 billions of years (after a Big Bang) and is about 15 billion light years thick; b) Acceptance of a rotating and sun-orbiting Earth which evolved 4.6 billion years ago; c) Acceptance of a figure of 3.8 billion years ago as the starting point for the evolution of life; d) Acceptance of the evolution of all plants and animals over those 3.8 billion years; e) Acceptance of a belief that the evolution of mankind from simian ancestors was achieved about a million years ago.

We’ve all been taught that these evolutionary answers for the origin of all that exists are facts of "secular science" so--unless we know better--we believe that this is the truth, and we factor that belief into the way we think and live our lives. If "science" says it, it must be true...look at all those billions of years for it to happen! All hail "science"!

But wait! The secret is out! (HERE, pp.5,6; HERE, pp.2-4; HERE - HERE). The real Origin of the Big Bang Paradigm of the Universe which is providing those billions of years for evolutionism to occur is found in a holy book of an avowedly anti-Christ religion, not in any fact of true science! False science--under the misleading title of Theoretical Science--has been the instrument used to establish the Kabbalic Universe with its evolutionary billions of years and thereby, not only fool the world, but slowly destroy the Bible’s Credibility from Creation through Jesus to Heaven.

Well, be assured that the omniscient Biblical God has anticipated every move of this diabolical strategy (Acts 15:18; I Pet. 1:20; etc.). Indeed, He has already begun to reveal not only the secrecy and fraud surrounding the Kabbalic Kosmos, but He also has already begun a measured release of the hard evidence which shows the world that Copernicanism is both the Keystone and the Achilles Heel of Satan’s entire edifice of deceptions about the universe, the Earth, and mankind.

The evidence of this centuries-old secret plan for establishing an evolved universe, Earth, and mankind has only recently been brought into the open (again: HERE, pp.5,6; HERE, pp. 2-4 - HERE - HERE). The deception involved in the global success of the Kabbalist Model has been documented and that documentation is overwhelming (HERE - HERE, pp. 5-7 - HERE ,p.9- HERE). The facts do not lie....

The cat is out of the bag!

***

Blessed be the name of the God of All Creation forever!

*******

Link to this webpage: http://www.fixedearth.com/Size%20and%20Structure%20VII.htm

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Size And Structure Of The Universe According To The Bible And Non-Theoretical Science - Part I To Part III: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6540
The Size And Structure Of The Universe According To The Bible And Non-Theoretical Science - Part IV To Part VII: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6536