Fiona Cristian Reply To State Debt Recovery Office Part Five - The Sick Puppy

LATEST UPDATE: 24th February 2009 9.08pm - Uploaded Documents Served On David Brown trading as Senior Constable DAVID BROWN c/o Bowral Police Station 24th Feb 2009 1.50pm - Arthur Cristian - Love For Life

Fiona Cristian Kidnapped By Highway Patrol Plant
Brought In To Do A Job Of Intimidating Fiona And Arthur Cristian

A REMINDER OF WHY WE HAVE PUT OURSELVES IN THESE SITUATIONS
AND WHY WE ARE DOCUMENTING OUR EXPERIENCES

The following events are a continuation of the documentation of the harm done on a daily basis to men and women who are not causing any harm. What emerges very clearly is the complete lack of any man or woman willing to take responsibility for either their own actions or the actions of anyone else in the legal/judicial/political/commercial/economic system. No crimes have been committed and no one has been injured or harmed in any way. There is no equal exchange in value between the Powers that Be and the men and women who have to deal with them.

POWERLESSNESS HOPELESSNESS CONFUSION AND PASSING THE BUCK

The system is designed to be impossible for us to use. With most of us being too busy to spend hours learning laws, statutes and even little things like how to file documents in court so that the magistrate or judge actually sees them, we are forced to rely on lawyers who have been initiated into the bar to do everything for us. Their position places them under strict guidelines which place the interest of corporations and the establishment over the well being of men and women. They are trained to reap the fruits of our labour for a system that gives us nothing of substance in return.

Just having to engage with the system that supposedly supports justice for all of us is so daunting that most of us prefer to do whatever it takes to avoid having to deal with it, even if we can afford to give all our savings to the lawyers. This leads us to accept the harm that is being done on a daily basis, rationalizing it and numbing ourselves to it to the extent that we think it is normal.

AUTHORITY AND POLICY ENFORCERS

Police Officers are trained to place more importance on statutes and their authority than on the lives of men and women to the extent that they are able to do harm to their fellow men and women in the name of the statutes without taking any responsibility for their actions. From the police officers to their superiors, right up the chain of command to the state and federal political ministers, to the state and federal governor generals and to those at the highest levels who represent "The Crown", i.e. Elizabeth Windsor acting in costume with title "The Queen", no one will take full responsibility for putting their energy into the creation of these harmful actions. They might make public appearances, go to church and be involved in good community works but, in their official capacity, they put their energy into and sanction acts of harm to men and women who are doing no harm.

Q: When is it ok to threaten someone who has done no harm, drag them from their car, use physical force against them, kidnap them and hold them against their will for a few hours without any recriminations or comeback?

A: When you are wearing a Police uniform.

We do not mean any harm to Policemen/women and recognise that, while many men and women refuse to take responsibility for the harm they are causing, Policemen/women do a tough, necessary job to prevent murder, violence, abuse, theft and all other crimes of harm from running rampant. However, we have got to the stage where Policemen/women spend the majority of their time acting as police officers (policy enforcers) enforcing statutes, raising revenue from men and women who are injuring no one and creating no disturbance of the peace.

As you will see, the amount of man power, time and energy that has been spent hounding Fiona over what started as a dog fine and a failure to vote fine is considerable and surely could have been better spent chasing someone who was doing harm to other men, women or children. The number of statutes in existence is such that lawyers can't keep up with them, let alone you and me and we suspect that most men and women are breaking some statute or other, daily or even hourly, without realising it.

COPYRIGHT

We are living in a true state of chaos under an insane system that promises protection and freedom for all but actually only offers protection for corporations and the Establishment while the rest of us survive a dog-eat-dog system where the weakest ones are hunted down by the predators of the Establishment and picked off one by one and those orchestrating and carrying out the harm are allowed to pass the buck. We are commercial chattel (slaves) bound by statutes to put our energy into the dead corpses of Government, Law, corporations, etc, that take us away from our families, friends, gardens and communities and everything that is living.

The artificial "persons" that are the corporations of the Government, law, private corporations, Police services, State and Federal departments, etc have been given legal rights as "persons" placing them above real living men, women and children and we are taught through our brainwashing education system to act out roles in the fairytale that is the dead corpse Western World Civilisation of Commerce to support and maintain the system that is destroying both us and the natural world that sustains us. These artificial "persons" are the props that form the infrastructure of the fairytale. To stay in the fairytale, we have to pay our dues to the copyright holder of the fairytale in the form of royalties, interest, taxes, registrations, fees, licences, certificates, passports, tolls, permits, titles, etc, in order to be able to use the intellectual proprietary knowledge and props of the copyright holder.

It is all about commerce with money being the life blood of the deathstyle system and we are renters of the copyright knowledge because we have been taught to believe that this knowledge is real and necessary for us to live. We have to abide by the rules, regulations, rituals, procedures and conditions of the copyright holder just as we would have to abide by the rules, regulations and rituals of the copyright holder of Harry Potter if we wanted to use/market/distribute/advertise anything of that copyright knowledge. If you break the conditions, there are penalties enforced by agents of the copyright holder. Everything to do with the Western World Civilisation Of Commerce is about paying for the use of the copyright, making us slaves in the guise of renters/serfs/commoners/goi/goy to the copyright holder and its "official" authorised representatives and agents.

It is all about the harm we are doing on a daily basis just by the way we live and how we can stop that harm. If the systems we live under, the houses we live in, the way we get around and the way we behave towards one another cause harm, they are not worth the (any) benefits they appear to provide. We put so much effort, so much time, into supporting and protecting a system that that does not protect or support us but lets us lose our homes, our livelihoods and tears apart our families and communities. Our Western World systems of commerce, law, banking, corporations, media, religions etc, are all about harm. How sick are we to keep propping up that which destroys us?

FEAR AND SCAREMONGERING

Some people accuse us of scaremongering or making them fearful but where do we tell people to be scared? How are we a threat? Where have we stated that we want to do harm and hurt people? Do we not state over and over that we are for NO HARM, for creating ways of life that nurture rather than destroying, for creating tribes and villages where we are all looked after and where we have the numbers to say no to the pirates of the Establishment?

We are not responsible for the fear people feel. Some men and women are scared to be associated with us for fear of what it may do to their positions in the system or because of what others may think of them, and others because they do not take the time to comprehend what we are talking about so they think we are nutcases. In the end, they are all passing the buck, waiting for someone else to come up with the solution to the constant harm doing of the system. We all have the responsibility to stop the destruction so please make sure you comprehend the remedy we offer before you reject it. What could be wrong with a remedy that offers a life of true freedom, joy and abundance FOR ALL?

WARNING

Be warned: the powers that be, the Freemasonic shadow government that has a finger in every pie, have caused all the chaos we are experiencing, supported by all of us who have been conned into believing their lies and deceptions. They will offer a remedy that they will claim to be the answer to all our problems but their so-called remedy will still be based on copyright and commerce, even if there is no cash, and will still be based on sacred geometry, mathematics and read and write alphabet languages. It (Their New World Order) will just be another version of the Western World Civilisation of Commerce (A Feel Good One) that is based on lies, deception and collusion, offers no full-disclosure and is a continuation of the same harm. Their civilisation of commerce only works while we do not remember who we really are and what we are really part of which is LIFE.

REMEDY

The remedy of Kindom we offer is one in which everything of life is about creating gifts for everything else of life with no need to survive our fictional selves, so that everyone is taken care of. The focus is on all of us co-creating gifts of life that benefit our communities/villages/tribes/nature/earth/families/children etc, instead of focusing on what's in it for us. In the end, it's all about taking full responsibility or response-ability. Let's respond to the harm we see all around us and use our ability to stop it. We were all once innocent, trusting, loving children who were gripped by the tentacles of the beast and taught to fight life rather than co-create with life. No one wins when they take on life and do harm. No matter how much money you have or what costumes and titles you hide behind, you cannot defeat life. Better to join it.

If were not surviving the fictitious wants/needs of our fictitious selves, the Western World Civilisation of Commerce would not exist. For more on this and the other esoteric and occultic subjects mentioned like the abominations of sacred geometry, mathematics and ALL read and write alphabet languages, refer to the 2 hour, informal, unedited, teaser video of an interview with Arthur and Fiona and a series of podcasts of Arthur appearing on a New York internet radio show here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6608 (scroll down to find them). These also cover the remedy to our problems in great depth and we are working on a documentary that encapsulates all the information in a form easily comprehensible for all, to be finished before the end of 2009.

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life

The Uninvited Attention Of A Gestapo Dressed Sick Puppy On A Mission

20th February 2009

IN COMES THE SICK PUPPY



This morning, at around 10.45am, I was stopped while journeying peacefully along the road near home in East Bowral. One officer, Senior Constable David Brown, a Mittagong Highway Police Officer (Policy Enforcer), pulled me over. He was alone but recorded everything on a video camera in the front of his car and on a voice recorder attached to his shirt. He was the most aggressive man I have ever come across. He refused to listen to anything I had to say and was obviously primed up as to what to say to me.

I asked him if he wanted me to enter a contract with him and I handed him the Notice of Written Communication. He took it but refused to read it, instead folding it up and putting it in his pocket. Let's hope he reads it at leisure and realises how much I charge for people using my name against my will. He asked me to produce my drivers licence three times and then said that as he had asked three times and I hadn't answered him, he was arresting (kidnapping is the appropriate word) me and that if I resisted he would throw me to the ground. This threat was repeated more than once.

Notice Of Written Communication See: http://www.loveforlife.com.au/node/5976 Or Open This PDF File: http://loveforlife.com.au/files/NOTICE%20OF%20WRITTEN%20COMMUNICATION.do...

He handcuffed me roughly and made me stand in front of his car for a while.The only "compassionate" thing he did all day was to "allow me" to go round to Xanthe (just turned two), who was obviously distressed, and he opened the door so I could talk to her before un-cuffing me and letting me take her out. He was full of intimidating comments, and said that he was going to get DOCS to come and get her. After I protested that her father was just around the corner, he did "allow" me to phone Arthur to come and get her.

In the meantime 3 other police vehicles had turned up, meaning that there were 4 police officers and four police cars all there for one woman and one child! When I made a comment about this (loud enough to get on his recorder), he said that he had called the other cars in to look after Xanthe while he took me away. I think this was just intimidation tactics and, as the other cars were all there within 10 minutes, they certainly hadn't been far away. Unlike when the sheriffs were here and we had to wait around 30 minutes for the police to arrive, they were there like a rocket. The other policemen all kept themselves to themselves as much as possible, managing to stammer a greeting when I said "Good morning" to them. They all looked embarrassed at the intimidation tactics going on and the tactics did work to the extent that I didn't ask for their names and badge numbers etc. I did notice that one of them was called "Dole".

THE FAILED NET



When I called Arthur, one of the cars went down the road and waited in a side street, closer to where he would be coming from. Whether they were hoping for aggression on his part so that they could kidnap him too, or that he might come in another privately registered car so they could get him that way, or whether they thought there might be more people coming, I don't know. He came back up when Arthur arrived on foot.

After Arthur had taken Xanthe (he also took a few photos but, after being threatened with arrest/kidnap if he took any more, he wisely decided that Xanthe's well-being was more important than his right to take photos), I was bundled into the police wagon by Mr Aggressive, but not before he had bent my left wrist double and squeezed it so that it was very painful, because I delayed a second in walking with him because I was saying something/ listening to Arthur. I swore at this point, though not at him and he instantly said something about foul language, blah, blah! I made sure I apologised for swearing in front of him when I got to the police station - just to really piss him off by remaining in honour and cleaning up anything I felt I should not have done!

Upon arrival at the Bowral police station, I was put into what I presume would be called a holding pen in the back room of the police station where all the "processing" goes on. They asked various questions, some of which I answered, some of which I didn't, depending on what I felt were their relevance to the situation. After toings and froings and Mr Aggressive getting so upset that I wanted to add something to some paperwork I had signed (saying that I had signed it under protest, duress and intimidation) that he cancelled it and, decided to "charge" me instead of giving this paper that was something about me "understanding" that my licence was suspended and probably saying I wouldn't drive or something.

The result of my arrest (kidnap) depended purely upon his whim according to his temper. And this man is supposed to be an Officer of the peace! I also noticed that he had written supposed "comments" of mine that were not correct, and I heard him saying to Snr Constable Gavin Halloway (the man in charge of the station) that he wasn't going to interview me because I wouldn't talk to him. I pointed out to Snr Constable Gavin Halloway that I had tried to talk to Mr Aggressive but that he wouldn't let me say anything. Snr Constable Gavin Halloway said that under traffic arrests (or whatever it was), he did not have to and I replied that the point was that he had lied because it was not true that I wouldn't talk to him.

After being left there for a while, the Senior Constable in charge of the station, Snr Constable Halloway, who at all times treated me respectfully and courteously, said I could sign bail papers and go. I asked what would happen if I didn't and he said I would be kept in custody until Monday morning when I could go before the court. With four young children at home, I elected to sign! Under every signature I wrote today "all rights reserved", and on every document, bar the one recording the possessions that were taken from me, I wrote "signed under protest, duress and intimidation". I also had my mug shots taken and my hand and finger prints done on a machine that didn't like my hands and kept saying it didn't recognise finger prints when it had just taken my hand print with the same fingers. An ink-pad would have been easier. And all this for someone who was journeying the land, doing harm to no one.

THE GROWL OF THE SICK PUPPY

I finally got out around 3 hours later to find Arthur and a friend who had arrived to help take care of Xanthe while Arthur got some pointers on how to help me. Arthur had got Snr Constable Gavin Halloway to read and sign a very rushed document regarding my arrest/kidnap (see below/on website).

As we left, walking down the road, we saw Mr Aggressive eyeing Arthur constantly, totally focused on him. Arthur said that he had been doing this on and off for the last twenty to thirty minutes while Arthur and friend had been waiting for me (in between walking up and down because Xanthe was asleep in the stroller and talking to a lovely elderly farming man wondering past).

Arthur also eyed him off for lengthy periods realising that this sick puppy was trying to intimidate him. Arthur said that this violent attack was pre-meditated and the sick puppy was brought in to do an intimidating hatchet job on the Cristian family. From beginning to end this sick puppy was pumped up for this pre-meditated meeting with us. Its obvious his instructions were to intimidate us, cause dissent between us, break down our resistance and dispirit us from the work we do.

On and off for 20 minutes or so Arthur had asked him (from a distance) many questions like who was the injured party and what harm have we done to you and are you not a peace officer. Arthur even explained to Mr Aggressive that Fiona is a free woman, not the property (public chattel) of the state etc. After Fiona came out, Arthur decided to go and talk to him in the police station car park. He wanted the sick puppy to know that we are not in fear of his intimidations.

Arthur walked right up to him. He aggressively told Arthur to leave and Arthur said he had come to talk to him, had no weapons and was no threat. He tried to hand him a copy of the piece of paper Snr Constable Gavin Halloway had signed but he refused it. Arthur asked him if he was a mason and who had sent him to do the job and whether he had a contract to intimidate us. He kept threatening to brutally bash Arthur backed by the intent of his facial, hand and other body gestures and even used Arthur's name. He said he knew who Arthur was and that he knew the Loveforlife Website (Ahhh There And Then He Gave It All Away - This Is A Set Up Job). Arthur kept telling him that he was not scared of him and "come on then.... bash me".

THE SICK PUPPY HAS RABIES


When Mr Aggressive said "see you in court," and Arthur told him there would be no court he completely lost it. He started performing a demonic Hakka. With manic eyes full of rage he got out his baton and said he would break Arthur's body into pieces, He called him a poof, that he would bend Arthur over and said Arthur would like it hard up the rear end. He pushed his body up to Arthur on many occasions without touching Arthur. He threatened Arthur with physical abuse more than 10 times. Arthur said the look of this mans eyes would not be out of place in the movie "Exorcist".

Arthur remained totally non-aggressive at all times and told him regularly that he sincerely loved him! Throughout the drama he repeatedly told Arthur not to touch him. He blew many a fuse when Arthur told him that he loved him and that he was our brother! Arthur told him he was not scared of him and that he could take his body and do what he wanted with it, kill him if you want. "Come on.... take it, take it"....... and kept saying "I love you".

The event ended with Arthur coming out onto the street followed by the sick puppy, with Arthur's arms folded inviting him to hit him where we could see. Mr Aggressive backed off. Arthur then went into the police station and reported the incident to Snr Constable Gavin Halloway who took down the details and said he would report this matter to the relevant inspectors.

The police kept the privately registered number plates for exhibits - our property!

Of note: The sick puppy looked under the boot of the car but could not find the engine and vin number plates because we removed them last year. Is this why they didn't take the car?

WHO IS IN CONTROL OF THE POLICE FORCE AND GOVERNMENT
ALLOWING SICK PUPPIES TO ROAM THE HIGHWAYS OF LIFE
TERRORISING THE COMMUNITY?

HOW CAN SICK PUPPIES BE ALLOWED TO BECOME POLICEMEN (PEACE OFFICERS) UNLESS ITS FOR A SPECIFIC TASK!

Mr Aggressive's short temper is obviously fuelled when he doesn't intimidate people as much as he would like. I also continued to ask him questions about what was going on and repeatedly asked him why he was so aggressive towards me when I wasn't being aggressive to him. On one of those occasions, at the scene of the arrest/kidnap, he said that he wasn't being aggressive, to which I replied that if I had been speaking to him in the same manner, he would have been telling me to stop! He didn't quite know what to say to that.

It is interesting to note that, without the protection of uniform and title, any man behaving towards me the way David Brown did (a local who lives close by to me), would be the one being arrested! We have been so brainwashed into accepting "authority" that we don't question brutality when it is acted out by someone in a uniform. Imagine if Mr Aggressive behaved this way around his family and friends; condemnation and incarceration would surely follow.

After I had signed my bail docs, I asked Snr Constable Gavin Halloway about the cancellation of the document mentioned above. He said it was probably no longer applicable. At this point Mr Aggressive walked in so Snr Constable Gavin Halloway suggested I ask him. I did so and he said that it had been no longer applicable. I asked a few more questions (trying to figure out if my hunch that it was because I wanted to add something to the document was correct) and he was as aggressive as usual, but did agree that he was able to make a change like that (i.e. in the severity of the outcome) just because he felt like it.

He then told me to get out a few times and, when I asked if Arthur was in the public waiting area (we walked passed it) he said, "I don't care." Snr Constable Gavin Halloway had the courtesy to tell me that he had seen Arthur walking up and down the footpath outside (putting Xanthe to sleep).

The whole incident had the smell of a set-up from start to finish, so the question to be asked is, who is behind it, who sent The Intimidator in, who stands to benefit and why are they so worried about us that they wasted hours of police time and spent many thousands of dollars over a one free woman travelling the land as is her right. They are supposed to maintain the peace but who disturbed the peace here? Me or them? Can anyone show us the law that says a free woman cannot travel the land in a car of her choosing?

We now have some documents to prepare to get the matter sorted out well before my court date - April 6th (I have no intention of going to court because the paperwork I will file will settle the matter without my living-breathing-walking-talking presence) - and some affidavits to serve on Police, Governor General, Pru Goward (The Champion Of Women's Rights), Police Minister, Attorney General etc, etc,.

We will post them on the website as we do it.

WELL PRU GOWARD CHAMPION OF WOMAN'S RIGHTS

MINISTER OF PARLIAMENT NSW STATE GOVERNMENT PRIVATE CORPORATION
WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT ALL THIS?

WELL TONY KELLY

MINISTER OF POLICE NSW STATE GOVERNMENT PRIVATE CORPORATION
WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT ALL THIS?

And Tony, What Happened To Your Customer Service?: http://loveforlife.com.au/files/Tony%20Kelly%20NSW%20MP%20Police%20Custo...






HEY ANDREW SCIPIONE

POLICE COMMISSIONER NSW POLICE
NSW STATE GOVERNMENT PRIVATE CORPORATION
WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT ALL THIS
PARTICULARLY YOUR CUSTOMER SERVICE?

WELL NATHAN REES

PREMIER NSW STATE GOVERNMENT PRIVATE CORPORATION
WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT ALL THIS?

WELL JOHN HATZISTERGOS

ATTORNEY GENERAL NSW STATE GOVERNMENT PRIVATE CORPORATION
WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT ALL THIS?

WELL MARIE BASHIR

GOVERNOR NSW STATE GOVERNMENT PRIVATE CORPORATION
WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT ALL THIS?

WELL QUENTIN BRYCE GOVERNOR GENERAL OF THE PRIVATE CORPORATION "COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA"

THE MOST POWERFUL POSITION IN THE CORPORATION OF AUSTRALIA
HIGHER THAN THE PRIME MINISTER - DIRECT LINK TO THE PRIVATE
CORPORATION "THE CROWN"
WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT ALL THIS?

WELL PRIVATE CORPORATION DUKE OF EDINBURGH AND
PRIVATE CORPORATION QUEEN ELIZABETH 11 HEAD OF
PRIVATE CORPORATION "COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA"

WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT ALL THIS?

The Sick Puppy Documents

Court Attendance Notice: http://loveforlife.com.au/files/Court%20Attendance%20Notice.pdf
Custody Management Report: http://loveforlife.com.au/files/Custody%20Management%20Report.pdf
Bail Undertaking: http://loveforlife.com.au/files/Bail%20Undertaking.pdf
Reason For Bail Decision: http://loveforlife.com.au/files/Reason%20For%20Bail%20Decision.pdf
Property Docket: http://loveforlife.com.au/files/Property%20Docket.pdf

Quickly From Arthur.....

IS THE SICK PUPPY ONE OF THEM?

I have been saying for a very long time now that within the Police Force (and possibly other forces/agencies/squads) exists a specialised secret little group of lackeys operating as hit-men, strike weapons of intimidation, terror, murder/assassination. On the surface they work as Policemen and Detectives but when required are relocated or contracted to do secret specific jobs at the beck and call of the Establishment, the True Freemasons working for "The Crowns" New World order Agenda. The two men in balaclavas who terrorised Joe Bryant and Wife: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6321 and another two men in balaclavas who terrorised the wife of Redfern Policeman Whistle-Blower Michael Cottier: http://www.loveforlife.com.au/node/5417 are in keeping with the standards/tactics of the relocated highway patrol sick puppy unleashed on Fiona and I today.

We know of many other instances but the victims are either too frightened or have distanced themselves from the memories though they are still damaged goods. These sick puppies are also used to terrorise members of the bar, police/defense/law forces/squads/agencies/enforcements, politicians and their families and for that matter anyone from both within and without True Freemasonry considered a problem that needs fixing (toeing the line). Any policeman/woman, member of the bar, big business representative, members of the media, those in other fields of endeavour and politicians who reads this posting, need to immediately work together to rout out this rogue element otherwise they could be visiting you or your family one day ---- IF ---- you are seen to be doing the right thing by the community at large and the wrong thing by the establishment of true freemasonry at the same time.

Is there any connection between the administrative work we are doing with the SDRO matter ("The Crown") posted in the love For Life website and the Sick Puppy?

Fiona Cristian Reply To State Debt Recovery Office
Part One: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/5742 - From 17th October 2008
Part Two: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6135 - From 18th December 2008
Part Three: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6295 - From 9th January 2009
Part Four: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6296 - From 14th January 2009
Part Five: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6375 - The Sick Puppy - From 20th February 2009
Part Six: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6390 - Police Officers, Sheriff’s Officers, Tow Truck Driver and State Debt Recovery Office Blatantly Ignore the Law To Rape, Pillage and Plunder The Private Property Of Fiona Cristian - From 11th March 2009
Part Seven: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6445 - From 3rd April 2009
Part Eight: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6652 - The Pirates Auction - From 4th April 2009
Part Nine: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/7073 - Arthur Cristian's Letter To Pru Goward MP - From 15th December 2009
Part Ten: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/7500 - Should We Be In Fear Of Those Who Claim To Protect Us? "Roman Cult" Canon Law - Ecclesiastical Deed Poll - The Work Of Frank O'Collins - From 13th October 2010

You Betcha 110%

And any connection between "The Crown" and our dream for the creation of Kindom?

KINDOM IN GREENWICH PARK
3000 Acres In-Between Sydney & Canberra
Not Too Far From Goulburn or Bowral
Part 1: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6305
Part 2: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6306
Part 3: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6320
Part 4: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6322
Part 5: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6321

[Note: Part 3 to Part 5 are being updated creating Part 6,7, 8, 9. Please keep checking back over the next week or so. It is so very important to comprehend the distinction between the dead god of fiction and the conscious-living God of creation because everything that comes from the dead God of Fiction is the basis of all our problems and the remedies to all our problems lie with creation. In the meantime, please refer to this link: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/5086#comment-1145 where this and other postings, above and below, provide a lot of information about this most important topic.]

You Betcha 110%

And any connection between "The Crown" and The Kindom workshop we organised 7th/8th March 2009: Workshop: Using The Fiction To Step Out Of The Fiction Towards Kindom 2 Day Workshop For Those In The Private Inspector UN Ravel: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6294

You Betcha 110%

And finally, in this photo it shows very clearly the gleeful look of a sick puppy showing off his bounty to intimidate me. He is clearly revealing his intent for intimidation and the intent for intimidation by those who sent him in to do this brutal ugly job. We do not live in a world of true freedom and we must rout out everyone involved in the agenda to keep it this way. A good place to start is "The Crown" QE11, Duke Of Edinburgh, Prince Phillip, The Governor General of Australia and work our way down from there. There are sick puppies everywhere. Their time has come to an end. Enough is Enough. Refer back to part 1, 2, 3 & 4 for the evidence of those responsible.


THE BAD MANS INVISIBLE PRISON

Also: When our three elder daughters Jasmin, Emma & Frances saw this above photo (we had not told them what transpired earlier today) they asked us why this policeman's eyes looked mean and why mummy and Xanthe looked troubled and upset. We told them that this man and others he works with and for, does not want mummy to be happy or to be free. We asked them how would any creature living free in the forest feel if they were captured, injured, treated badly and forced to live in a bad-mans prison never allowed to leave and be free again. They all said they would break down the doors to the prison and set free all the trapped creatures of the forest. And we said that that is exactly what mummy and daddy are doing to be sure you all grow up free and not trapped in any bad-man prison. We explained that this man in the photo wants us to live in an invisible bad-man prison and that he hurt mummy and tried to scare mummy into this bad-man invisible prison where she would be trapped forevermore. The children all said they felt very sorry for this sick bad-man-policeman and asked us to help him get better so that the invisible prison will go away and mummy and daddy will be happy and free.

KINDOM

Our work is to awaken the people en-masse to Kindom. We can't do this (achieve this) while being bogged down doing our own individualised administrative paper work. Though it assists in temporarily keeping the wolves at bay it actually makes us self-centered individuals (notice the word divid = divide in the middle of the word individual) divided from each other, therefore powerless to stop the evil ones growing sublime arrogance.

Without community immunity we have no resistance against sublime arrogance.

For years we have been sounding the alarm bells of the coming onslaught of sublime arrogance as in Lenin, Stalin, Pol Pot, Idi Amin etc etc. No administrative paperwork repels this sickness. Around 60 million ex soviets were murdered by the sublime arrogance of Lenin, Stalin & Khrushchev.

What we encountered yesterday was sublime, demonic arrogance of the worst kind, an unconscious-dead hu-man sheeple with no listening and almost zilch communication skills with the living, meaning he had no empathy, compassion, fairness etc all attributes of consciousness. He is a dead drone/zombie, a very sick puppy.

If we do not awaken many of us ASAP to come together and serve each other (the conscious-living forming community immunity) instead of our me, me, me, i, i, i, which makes us unconscious of each others true-living existence and needs, we are left powerless and defenceless against the brutality and tyranny of those putting their energy (imagination) into dead fictionalised characters, becoming lost acting out roles in this sick dead-non-living fairytale called "The Western World Civilisation Of Commerce" controlled by "The Establishment Of Fallen Man's True Freemasonry", its head being "The Crown". We don't need states, societies and citizens, instead we need to remember who we really are and why we are here. Surely life isn't about the fleeting, superficial satisfaction gleaned from possessions and self-gratification. Once we remember that we are co-creators of creation and willingly shoulder the responsibility of doing our part to clean up the mess we have made, the satisfaction we will feel as the earth begins to blossom again and as we wean ourselves from our fiction addictions to become healthy, conscious men and women, will far surpass anything we experience now.

What are we waiting for? How many more examples of the sickness of The Western World do we need before we decide to do things differently?

EMAIL

Sunday 22nd February 2009

Thanks Thomas
You said: "Remember we all create and attract everything that comes into our lives".... That is why we must co-create community immunity (Kindom way of life) "The Remedy" because we have to inspire a larger portion of the population to focus on Kindom rather than on what they presently and individually are focusing/imagining on collectively in the dead world fairytale (Remember we all create and attract everything that comes into our lives.).

The sheeple unconsciously and collectively are creating a mushroom of evil, of destruction, a cloud of New World Order (sublime arrogance in power) no different to the Chemtrails http://loveforlife.com.au/chemtrails presently effecting all of us, whether we are residing in small or large community/urban areas anywhere on Oz.. You and I are not involved in the Chemtrail spraying and we want it stopped but we have millions of unconscious sheeple (individuals) guaranteeing the spraying continues. Yes we, not of the sheeple flocks, can counteract the effects of Chemtrails but the sheeple can't, yet we have to still live amongst its evil daily spray.

If we do not create community immunity then this evil disease of sublime arrogance continues to spread amongst us (like the chemtrails) and gain strength until it harms us/destroys us, left, right and center

Do you comprehend?

No book or paper or website can repel destroyed men and women acting out their sublime arrogant character rolls in this evil-sick fairytale. Yes, books, paper and websites etc can help any awakening sheeple to become aware of what is going on but we must offer them the other missing steps (of conscious-living co-creation creating substance) that inspire them to co-create Kindom/Creation with others. We must provide them with a new program (new information) "on offer" without invalidating uniqueness, to attract their attention/interests on conscious-living substance while distracting them from continuing to focus on (imagining - believing in) the dead fiction fairytale.

We are not worried in any way whatsoever, we are just determined/focused on remedy. Nothing fazes us and we willingly use our lives as guinea pigs so that sheeple can learn to dot the i's and cross the t's (awaken them, - inspire them by example) and once sheeple start asking questions ----------- "bingo" they start joining with others, start holding hands to re-form the shield of community immunity and the larger the Kindom (real - normal) way of life shield becomes the more powerful the force to repel and destroy both the dead characters and the fairytale they act within, meaning causing the white collars to flee from their 3rd party titles and posts.

We are planning to create monthly/fortnightly Kindom workshops after the first one 7th/8th March ---- Investigate how we can live with each other without money, insurance, doing harm to earth and man etc, how to live with each other taking full responsibility for our actions, how to resolve issues, how to heal all diseases (physical, emotional, brain-psycho-logical etc), how to grow food to feed each other, how to live with each other in peace, in harmony etc where everyone wins and there are no losers, how to guide/teach our children, how to create eco-sustainable communities, tribes, villages without doing harm to earth and man. By bringing in those experienced to share their information on herbs, healing, growing food, permaculture, community schools etc etc, we will all learn as we go along. The benefits that arise from Kindom w/shops are immense and that is why Kindom is the remedy. Will explain all the benefits at another time.

Conscious Love Always
Fiona and Arthur Cristian
Love For Life
action @ loveforlife.com.au
www.loveforlife.com.au
0418 203204 (Int: 0011 61 418 203204)
PO Box 1320 Bowral 2576 NSW Australia

FIONA CRISTIAN RUSHED 1ST SET OF DOCUMENTS SERVED ON DAVID BROWN C/O BOWRAL POLICE STATION 24TH FEBRUARY 2009 WITHIN 72 HOURS OF FIONA BEING RELEASED - AFTER ERRORS HAVE BEEN RECTIFIED AND DOCUMENTS UPDATED WITH FURTHER INFORMATION AN AMENDED SET OF DOCUMENTS WILL BE SERVED ON DAVID BROWN C/O BOWRAL POLICE STATION AND FILED WITH REGISTRAR OF MOSS VALE COURT

Fiona-Caroline: Cristian,
Principal,
UCC xxxx xxx xxxx x
Xxx xxxxxxxxx xxxxx,
Bowral, without New South Wales [2576]
Tuesday 24th February 2009

NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF PRESENTMENTS
AND
REQUEST FOR FULL AND BETTER PARTICULARS

David Brown trading as Senior Constable DAVID BROWN
In care of Bowral Police Station,
53 Wingecarribee Street,
Bowral, NSW 2576

Notice to agent is notice to principal and notice to principal is notice to agent

Time sensitive document, estoppel conditions will apply upon default. All addressed parties Joint and Severally and applicable to all Successors Nominees and/or assigns.

Greetings,

I, the free woman commonly known as Fiona-Caroline: Cristian, am writing to inform you of my full acceptance and return of the presentments given to me by you on 20th February AD2009.

Enclosed also are copies of a letter to the Magistrate or Registrar at the Moss Vale Court, requesting the immediate withdrawal of COURT ATTENDANCE NOTICE number 745649980.

Should, however the aforesaid ‘Court Attendance Notice’ not be withdrawn and the matter litigated then I may be forced to take the matter further and perhaps subpoena you to a formal hearing as my witness as to a matter of your delinquency and gross negligence bordering a fraud in attempting to commercially rape, plunder assault and kidnap me.
This I would prefer to avoid.

Finally, in order to attain your true intent as well as to identify all real issues in this matter should the matter not be settled and closed in timely manner privately, I request certain and better particulars from you. Please provide your timely response by way of sworn affidavit bearing your name and valuable autograph before two witnesses of good standing, as to being true, correct, complete, certain and not misleading and with first hand personal knowledge and show;

1. I am NOT a diverse party to FIONA CAROLINE CRISTIAN,

2. I am a resident, citizen, rate payer, tax payer and NOT a living breathing life force spirit within a body of a man nor a child of the Creator commonly called ‘God’ or ‘Yhwh’,

3. I have NOT noticed the relevant parties in this matter of my intent to not harm any party and that I wish to conduct my private affairs in peace, harmony and goodwill and for the benefit of mankind, though I cannot prevent any party that cause or intends to cause me harm, from harming themselves, and that I shall notice them prior to any action I may take against them, out of my sense of a duty of care, and that I shall hold any aggressor personally liable for the harm they cause me if they wish to pursue their action against me.

4. I have NOT provided a duty of care by noticing those parties in authority at Issuing party that I shall hold any delinquent party liable for their delinquency and gross negligence should they fail to inform and notice their underlings in relation to the performance of their duties, that if any party injures or harms me in any many, that I reserve the right to and will hold the offender/perpetrator accountable and liable under their own commercial liability for their actions.

5. I have NOT now humbly instructed the relevant parties to withdraw ‘Court Attendance Notice’ number 745649980 in order to settle and close this matter.

6. It is NOT my intent to go to my neighbour in order to resolve this matter
Privately, and settle promptly and honourably and that by my actions thus far, has NOT been my clear demonstration to verify my intent.

7. I am NOT a foreigner and living foreign to and without the State of
New South Wales.

8. That you, David Brown trading as Senior Constable DAVID BROWN, have NOT failed to reply to my written communication and therefore by your silence have NOT accepted and agreed that your actions were delinquent and negligent and made under your own authority for which you bear unlimited commercial liability.

9. Any order made by the Moss Vale Magistrates Court in this matter applies to me and does NOT apply only to the alleged offender whose name appears on the paper ‘NOTICE TO APPEAR’.

10. If my body is detained, assaulted, kidnapped or raped and any of my property seized, taken or with held from me in lieu of a mistake in identity with alleged offender and aforesaid party written on the paper ‘COURT ATTENDANCE NOTICE’, FIONA CRISTIAN, FIONA C. CRISTIAN, FIONA CAROLINE CRISTIAN that I can NOT and do NOT reserve the right to hold liable, press charges and make counterclaim for injuries against ALL the perpetrators in this matter, including but not limited to, the presiding Magistrate or Registrar in this matter should they issue a warrant or order to detain or otherwise apprehend the alleged offender but fail in their duty of care to their underlings, to educate or inform them to leave me alone and in peace.

11. I, as a free woman and living life force spirit within the body of a woman, have any jurisdiction, energy or standing to be present at a hearing within any State of New South Wales court and that you can show you can NOT and are NOT able to settle and close the matter yourselves, as employees of the parties that created and hold title to the Cestui Que Trust, particularly if I consent, authorize and encourage you to do so, as the sponsor of the energy and credit to the public.

Should you fail to furnish said particulars by way of sworn affidavit on a point for point basis rebutting each point raised by me, within the next seven days of the date of this NOTICE OF REQUEST FOR FURTHER AND BETTER PARTICULARS, it shall be deemed by all parties to this matter as to their acceptance and agreement the matter is settled and closed with prejudice. If any party pursues me without verification of claim for injury to them, that aforesaid party accepts all liability personally and consents to pay FIONA CAROLINE CRISTIAN the following sums in lieu of injury to me.

1. Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00) for each communication made to FIONA CAROLINE CRISTIAN or me, whether telephonically or in writing, which is not in affidavit form autographed under claimant’s own unlimited commercial liability, regarding their unsubstantiated claim, that requires my energy in replying in order for me to retain my honour and creditor status.

2. Three times the value of any property, the enjoyment and use of which by FIONA CAROLINE CRISTIAN or I is impaired as a result of claimant/s party and Issuing party’s actions without having first provided documentation verifying their claim;

3. The equivalent of Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00) for each transaction initiated by FIONA CAROLINE CRISTIAN where FIONA CAROLINE CRISTIAN’S commercial ability is impeded due to claimant/s adverse credit reporting,

4. Claimant parties owe FIONA CAROLINE CRISTIAN the amount equivalent to the amount attained in any court order in Australian dollars of your unsubstantiated claim and triple damages,

5. The equivalent of Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each court appearance FIONA CAROLINE CRISTIAN or I make in response to claimant’s unsubstantiated claims; and claimant/s also voluntarily agree to:

6. Authorize Principal and FIONA CAROLINE CRISTIAN to record a UCC – 1 on them as debtors to secure the debt owed FIONA CAROLINE CRISTIAN; and

7. Prove their claim against the estate of FIONA CAROLINE CRISTIAN if they force the alleged debtor into involuntary bankruptcy.

8. The terms and conditions to the enclosed Notice of Written Communication

The matter is finally and totally settled.

This is a private communication to you in your individual capacity and is intended to effect a private settlement of this matter.

Please conduct yourself accordingly.

Any mail addressed in any way other than at the head of this Notice in the proper English language format will be returned to you without dishonour as undeliverable as addressed, as will any mail not properly autographed identifying the issuer and bearing their own unlimited commercial liability, and should verification of your claim not be submitted before proceeding with any action against me, will immediately incur an invoice issued to you for injuries pursuant to the above stipulations.

I trust this completes the matter and that an amicable and timely resolution is now attained privately.

With sincere appreciation of your honourable services.

With my very best regards
By,

Fiona-Caroline: Cristian Principal. All rights reserved. Only in the correct capacity as beneficiary to the original jurisdiction.

Exhibit
a. COURT ATTENDANCE NOTICE – not accepted, duly stamped and timely returned without dishonour to maker
b. PROPERTY DOCKET – not accepted, duly stamped and timely returned without dishonour to maker
c. BAIL UNDERTAKING – not accepted, duly stamped and timely returned without dishonour to maker
d. CUSTODY MANAGEMENT RECORD – not accepted, duly stamped and timely returned without dishonour to maker
e. REASON FOR BAIL DECISION BY AUTHORISING OFFICER – not accepted, duly stamped and timely returned without dishonour to maker

Attachment

1. Private Notice – Non Commercial – Non Residential
2. Affidavit in Support Notice of Request for Certain and Better Particulars
3. Notice of Written Communication
4. Acknowledgment of Initial Financing Statement and addendum
5. Affidavit of Truth
6. Copy of Notice of Request for Full and Better Particulars addressed to the Registrar and the Magistrate at Moss Vale Cout
7. Copy of article entitled “POLICE FOCUS ON CUSTOMER SERVICE” by the Hon Tony Kelly MLC, Minister For Police
8. Copy of Private Registration and Property Status of car

Stamped Accepted For Value And Returned For Value All Presentments From David Brown trading as Senior Constable DAVID BROWN to FIONA CAROLINE CRISTIAN dated 20th February 2009: PDF FILE - 3.41mb 17 x A4 Pages: http://loveforlife.com.au/files/Presentments%20Of%20David%20Brown%20%20A...

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL
NOT FOR PUBLIC FILING
TIME SENSITIVE, ESTOPPEL BY CONDUCT APPLIES

Fiona-Caroline: Cristian,
Principal,
UCC xxxx xxx xxxx x
Xxx xxxxxxx xxxxxxx,
Bowral, without New South Wales [2576]
Tuesday 24th February 2009

NOTICE OF REQUEST FOR FURTHER AND BETTER PARTICULARS

The man trading as Magistrate and

The man trading as Registrar
Moss Vale Court
Argyle Street
Moss Vale, New South Wales [2577]

Notice to agent is notice to principal and notice to principal is notice to agent
Time sensitive document, estoppel conditions will apply upon default. All addressed parties Joint and Severally and applicable to all Successors Nominees and/or assigns.

Greetings.

I, the free woman commonly called Fiona-Caroline: Cristian, bid you a pleasant day and one filled with many personally satisfying achievements.

I write to you out of my concern for not only my personal welfare and safety, but potentially other parties also, in regard to recently, on the 20th February, AD2009 being hailed to pull to the side of the road in Alice Street, East Bowral by a man driving dangerously close behind me and flashing both the head lights of the car and some coloured lights on the dashboard at me. Once I had stopped, a man dressed in a blue costume got out of the car in question and came over to my car so I opened my car door to see what he wanted. He proceeded to threaten me before assaulting, raping and kidnapping my body all without my permission. My two-year-old daughter was in the car at the time and she was very distressed to see her mother being treated in such a manner. More men in blue costumes, calling themselves “Police Officers”, arrived in more cars and they stood and watched while the first man continued to speak to me in a threatening and highly aggressive manner and physically abused me. I was then taken to Bowral Police Station and kept there against my will, my possessions taken from me and unable to contact anyone, for approximately 3 hours, only being released after I signed some papers (I was told I would have to remain there for the weekend if I did not do so) and had some photographs taken and my hand, thumb and finger prints recorded on a machine. One of the pieces of paper I had to sign is an “order” to appear before a building called a court.

I have since, within 72 hours of accepting the presentments, returned same to the maker of the instrument for him to settle and close and to meet the obligation it imposes on the one retaining it.

I do not comprehend why I was so treated and wish to ask of you if all those in the employ of the service called New South Wales Police Service are trained in the manner I was dealt with, that of causing controversies, treating people with disrespect, causing others harm and generally searching for avenues to cause trouble and malicious injury to others, and if so, for what purpose?

Enclosed, please find copies of my written communication to the offenders requesting they either cure their dishonour or face the consequences of their actions.

I wish to notice you also as my duty of care that I wish no-one harm but will hold any party accountable and liable for harm they cause me.

At this point I cannot instruct you what you ought do as I believe, as a free woman, that I have no jurisdiction to force my will on others. Neither am I permitted to harm anyone nor do I wish to as I sincerely believe in the commandment to ‘love thy neighbor’, and therefore I find it profitable to uplift my fellow man rather then rape, pillage and plunder as some do.

The reason for my concern is that the front window of the car of which I was steering clearly displays a sign, a copy of which is enclosed with this NOTICE OF REQUEST FOR FURTHER AND BETTER PARTICULARS (attachment 1), indicating the car is for non-commercial and only for private use that there is not to be any trespass over this car. There is no consent provided to trespass and there is also clear indication as to my status of reserving all my rights and remedies.

The aggressor has clearly breached/transgressed his duties in his public capacity by attempting to contract with a private woman in a non commercial environment.

The implications are potentially grave and could involve the issuing and enforcement of severe penalties against a number of parties in the public for breach of numerous laws, including but not limited to, a breach of the peace that aforesaid man posing as ‘Police Officer’ is foresworn to, breaching my contract to remain private by attempting to coerce me into your public domain where I am vulnerable to the personally harmful effects of commerce, of which I fully experienced in the form of assault, kidnap and rape, breaching my contract to not tamper or trespass over private property, breach of his fiduciary duty and oath of office to protect people and more.

As I have a duty of care to my ‘neighbour’, I chose to first notice the delinquent party of my terms and conditions for entering into a contract with me (see attachment 2) so as to first provide him a remedy and opportunity to correct or cure his dishonour, in the event of their action being one attributable to oversight, honest mistake, fatigue, ignorance or other, rather then taking a more serious initial approach and seek to attain a penalty against the offender/transgressor.

I humbly wish to request of you to please instruct the relevant people in authority within your court system or other department that addresses “Court Attendance Notices”, to please withdraw ‘Court Attendance Notice’ number 745649980 henceforth in timely manner and to provide confirmation of same to me by way of written communication as I do not accept the ‘Court Attendance Notice’.

I am of the belief, and have not seen or been presented with any material facts or evidence that shows otherwise, that the issued ‘Court Attendance Notice’ is an offer to contract, and a contract is consummated by an offer and an acceptance, and that by me not accepting the issued ‘Court Attendance Notice’ without dishonour to the issuer, does not constitute a contract or acceptance of a contract, and believes sincerely that none exists.

Further, I humbly request of you that you please notice all your men and women acting as Police Officers, to in future to take notice of any cars that have signage indicating the car as being private and not for commercial purposes, that is, ‘non commercial use’, to not place any ‘Infringement Notice’ on such cars that have private notices displayed, so that you not only take responsibility, accountability and liability for your underlings actions but provide them with a duty of care to notice and educate them in order to prevent them harming themselves by any delinquent or erroneous actions and prevent any potential future litigation as a result of their ignorant, delinquent or otherwise, action.

I entrust the intent of my notice is clear to you as to preferring to settle this matter privately, timely and honourably so that no party is harmed and all parties maintain their honour and integrity.

I thank you in advance for your honourable and timely attention to this matter.

Should, however the aforesaid ‘Court Attendance Notice’ not be withdrawn by the issuing party and the matter litigated then I may be forced to take the matter further and perhaps subpoena you to a formal hearing as my witness as to a matter of your delinquency and gross negligence bordering a fraud in attempting to commercially rape, plunder assault and kidnap me.
This I would prefer to avoid.

Finally, in order to attain your true intent as well as to identify all real issues in this matter should the matter not be settled and closed in timely manner privately, I request certain and better particulars from you. Please provide your timely response by way of sworn affidavit bearing your name and valuable autograph before two witnesses of good standing, as to being true, correct, complete, certain and not misleading and with first hand personal knowledge and show;

1. I am NOT a diverse party to FIONA CAROLINE CRISTIAN,

2. I am a resident, citizen, rate payer, tax payer and NOT a living breathing life force spirit within a body of a man nor a child of the Creator commonly called ‘God’ or ‘Yhwh’,

3. I have NOT noticed the relevant parties in this matter of my intent to not harm any party and that I wish to conduct my private affairs in peace, harmony and goodwill and for the benefit of mankind, though I cannot prevent any party that cause or intends to cause me harm, from harming themselves, and that I shall notice them prior to any action I may take against them, out of my sense of a duty of care, and that I shall hold any aggressor personally liable for the harm they cause me if they wish to pursue their action against me.

4. I have NOT provided a duty of care by noticing those parties in authority at Issuing party that I shall hold any delinquent party liable for their delinquency and gross negligence should they fail to inform and notice their underlings in relation to the performance of their duties, that if any party injures or harms me in any many, that I reserve the right to and will hold the offender/perpetrator accountable and liable under their own commercial liability for their actions.

5. I have NOT now humbly instructed the relevant parties to withdraw ‘Court Attendance Notice’ number 745649980 in order to settle and close this matter.

6. It is NOT my intent to go to my neighbour in order to resolve this matter
Privately, and settle promptly and honourably and that by my actions thus far, has NOT been my clear demonstration to verify my intent.

7. I am NOT a foreigner and living foreign to and without the State of
New South Wales.

8. The offending aggressor, a man dressed in a blue costume, has NOT failed to reply to my written communication and therefore by his silence has NOT accepted and agreed that his actions were delinquent and negligent and made under his own authority for which he bears unlimited commercial liability.

9. Any order made by the Moss Vale Magistrates Court in this matter applies to me and does NOT apply only to the alleged offender whose name appears on the paper ‘NOTICE TO APPEAR’.

10. If my body is detained, assaulted, kidnapped or raped and any of my property seized, taken or with held from me in lieu of a mistake in identity with alleged offender and aforesaid party written on the paper ‘COURT ATTENDANCE NOTICE’, FIONA CRISTIAN, FIONA C. CRISTIAN, FIONA CAROLINE CRISTIAN that I can NOT and do NOT reserve the right to hold liable, press charges and make counterclaim for injuries against ALL the perpetrators in this matter, including but not limited to, the presiding Magistrate or Registrar in this matter should they issue a warrant or order to detain or otherwise apprehend the alleged offender but fail in their duty of care to their underlings, to educate or inform them to leave me alone and in peace.

11. I, as a free woman and living life force spirit within the body of a woman, have any jurisdiction, energy or standing to be present at a hearing within any State of New South Wales court and that you can show you can NOT and are NOT able to settle and close the matter yourselves, as employees of the parties that created and hold title to the Cestui Que Trust, particularly if I consent, authorize and encourage you to do so, as the sponsor of the energy and credit to the public.

Should you fail to furnish said particulars by way of sworn affidavit on a point for point basis rebutting each point raised by me, within the next seven days of the date of this NOTICE OF REQUEST FOR FURTHER AND BETTER PARTICULARS, it shall be deemed by all parties to this matter as to their acceptance and agreement the matter is settled and closed with prejudice. If any party pursues me without verification of claim for injury to them, that aforesaid party accepts all liability personally and consents to pay FIONA CAROLINE CRISTIAN the following sums in lieu of injury to me.

1. Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00) for each communication made to FIONA CAROLINE CRISTIAN or me, whether telephonically or in writing, which is not in affidavit form autographed under claimant’s own unlimited commercial liability, regarding their unsubstantiated claim, that requires my energy in replying in order for me to retain my honour and creditor status.

2. Three times the value of any property, the enjoyment and use of which by FIONA CAROLINE CRISTIAN or I is impaired as a result of claimant/s party and Issuing party’s actions without having first provided documentation verifying their claim;

3. The equivalent of Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00) for each transaction initiated by FIONA CAROLINE CRISTIAN where FIONA CAROLINE CRISTIAN’S commercial ability is impeded due to claimant/s adverse credit reporting,

4. Claimant parties owe FIONA CAROLINE CRISTIAN the amount equivalent to the amount attained in any court order in Australian dollars of your unsubstantiated claim and triple damages,

5. The equivalent of Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each court appearance FIONA CAROLINE CRISTIAN or I make in response to claimant’s unsubstantiated claims; and claimant/s also voluntarily agree to:

6. Authorize Principal and FIONA CAROLINE CRISTIAN to record a UCC – 1 on them
as debtors to secure the debt owed FIONA CAROLINE CRISTIAN; and

7. Prove their claim against the estate of FIONA CAROLINE CRISTIAN if they force the alleged debtor into involuntary bankruptcy.

8. The terms and conditions to the enclosed Notice of Written Communication

The matter is finally and totally settled.

This is a private communication to you in your individual capacity and is intended to effect a private settlement of this matter. Please conduct yourself accordingly.

Any mail addressed in any way other than at the head of this Notice in the proper English language format will be returned to you without dishonour as undeliverable as addressed, as will any mail not properly autographed identifying the issuer and bearing their own unlimited commercial liability, and should verification of your claim not be submitted before proceeding with any action against me, will immediately incur an invoice issued to you for injuries pursuant to the above stipulations.

I trust this completes the matter and that an amicable and timely resolution is now attained privately.

With sincere appreciation of your honourable services.

With my very best regards
By,

Fiona-Caroline: Cristian Principal. All rights reserved. Only in the correct capacity as beneficiary to the original jurisdiction.

Exhibit
a. COURT ATTENDANCE NOTICE – not accepted and timely returned without dishonour to maker

Attachment

1. Private Notice – Non Commercial – Non Residential
2. Affidavit in Support Notice of Request for Certain and Better Particulars
3. Notice of Written Communication
4. Acknowledgment of Initial Financing Statement and addendum
5. Affidavit of Truth
6. Copy of Notice of Acceptance of Presentments and Request for Full and Better Particulars addressed to David Brown trading as Senior Constable DAVID BROWN
7. Copy of article entitled “POLICE FOCUS ON CUSTOMER SERVICE” by the Hon Tony Kelly MLC, Minister For Police
8. Copy of Private Registration and Property Status of car

Acknowledgment Of Initial Financing Statement And Addendum (UCC1 Financing Statement) - Private Document Not For Public View

Fiona-Caroline of the family known as Cristian,
Principal,
UCC1 xxxx-xxx-xxxx-x
Post Office Box 1320
Bowral, New South Wales [2576]

Monday 23rd February AD2009

Bowral district/county ) Asseveration
Australia )
) L.S. ______________________________________________
) only in the capacity as beneficiary of the original jurisdiction

FIAT JUSTITIA, RUAT COELUM

Let Right Be Done, Though The Heavens Should Fall

I, commonly called Fiona-Caroline of the family known as Cristian, in my correct and proper public capacity as a beneficiary to the original jurisdiction, being of majority in age, competent to testify, a self realised free woman upon the land, my yes be yes, my no be no, do state that the truths and facts herein are of first hand first-hand-personal-knowledge, as true, correct, complete, certain, not misleading, so help me Yhwh.

AFFIDAVIT of TRUTH

1. I am of legal age and competent to testify where required.

2. I have first hand knowledge of the facts stated herein.

3. I have not seen or been presented with any material fact or evidence that show that:
I am not a diverse party to the alleged Offender/person CRISTIAN, FIONA CAROLINE named in the presentment ‘COURT ATTENDANCE NOTICE’ number ‘745649980’ dated 20.02. 2009 and believe sincerely that none exists.

4. I have not seen or been presented with any material fact or evidence that show that:
I am not a living life force free woman commonly called Fiona-Caroline: Cristian for the sake of communication, and believe sincerely that none exists.

5. On the morning of 20th February 2009, at around 10.45am, I was journeying towards home with my two- year-old daughter when I noticed a blue car driving too close behind me. As I turned into Alice Street, East Bowral, I was further distracted by the car continuing to drive dangerously close behind me. Looking in my rear view mirror, I noticed the driver of the car flashing his/her lights and also some small coloured lights flashing along his/her dashboard. Thinking that the driver perhaps needed some help with something, I pulled over to the side of the road, luckily a quiet street where I was able to do so without causing a disturbance to any traffic or passers-by.

6. I have not seen or been presented with any material fact or evidence that show that:
Driving a car too close behind another, as well as flashing lights at me was not a danger and distraction to me journeying safely along the King’s Highways and Byways, and believe that none exists.

7. One man dressed in a blue costume walked from the car behind me and up to my car door whereupon I opened my car door to see what he wanted from me.

8. The man identified himself as Senior Constable Brown of the Mittagong Highway Patrol. I later discovered that this man is commonly known as David Brown. The man commonly known as David Brown asked me to show him my driver’s licence. I was immediately shocked by the extremely aggressive manner in which he addressed me.

9. I asked if the man commonly called David Brown if he wished to enter into a contract with me and handed him my Notice of Written Communication which sets down my terms for entering into any contract. The man commonly called David Brown took it but refused to look at it, folding it up and putting it in his pocket. He again asked to see my drivers licence.

10. I attempted to inform the man commonly known as David Brown that I was a free woman and not a “person” as defined in Black’s law dictionary regarding statutes and that therefore I was not bound by statute law. The man commonly called David Brown refused to listen to me and rudely interrupted me, all the while speaking very aggressively.

11. I have not seen or been presented with any material fact or evidence that show that:
By me providing the aforesaid Notice of Written Communication setting out my terms for entering into a contract with me, and by trying to explain my status as a free woman free to the man commonly called David Brown, it did not reveal my intent to be transparent and looking out for the interest of my ‘neighbor’, and believe sincerely that none exists.

12. The man commonly called David Brown chose to ignore my statement and Notice of Written Communication and asked me for my drivers licence for the third time. When I did not produce one, he pulled out his handcuffs and told me I was under arrest (meaning he is kidnapping my body) and that, if I resisted, he would throw me to the ground. This threat was repeated a few times.

13. In trepidation of being assaulted and beaten and for the safety of my daughter, I exited the car by my open door and was roughly handcuffed and directed to stand behind my car but before the car behind me.

14. I have not seen or been presented with any material fact or evidence that show that:
David Brown trading as Senior Constable D Brown, an employee New South Wales Police Service, has first hand personal knowledge that I was not journeying along the King’s Highways and byways in peace and harmony, in a private capacity and minding my own affairs, and believe sincerely that none exists

15. I have not seen or been presented with any material fact or evidence that show that: David Brown trading as Senior Constable D BROWN, an employee of New South Wales Police Service, has first hand personal knowledge that I did not already possess the right to journey along the King’s Highways and byways in peace and harmony, in a private capacity and minding my own affairs, and believes sincerely that none exists.

16. The necessitous aggressive manner of David Brown trading as Senior Constable D BROWN and his obvious eagerness to arrest/kidnap me over an alleged driving offence without taking the time to listen to what I had to say caused me to realise that his sole motivation for stopping me was to cause a controversy as an excuse to intimidate, frighten and arrest/kidnap me.

17. I have not seen or been presented with any material fact or evidence that show that:
the man commonly called David Brown trading as Senior Constable D. Brown can show it was not his intent to create a controversy and to harm the occupants of the car he contrived to pull off the road and that by doing so, he did not do so under false pretences of looking after the welfare of the very people he has sworn an oath to protect and that it was not his intent to rape, pillage, plunder, assault, kidnap or otherwise injure me or anyone else travelling with me under the pretext of colour of law, and believe sincerely that none exists.

18. While standing where I had been ordered to do so, I requested that I might be allowed to stand by my 2 year old daughter who would be distressed at my sudden disappearance. After a couple of minutes and threats by the man commonly called David Brown trading as Senior Constable D. BROWN that he would be calling DOCS to take my daughter away. He then accompanied me to her door and opened it where we found her in a very distressed state. The handcuffs were removed and I was allowed to take her out of her car seat to comfort her.

19. In the meantime a Police truck and two more police cars had arrived in a very short space of time, meaning there were four police vehicles and four Police officers either arresting/kidnapping or supporting the arrest/kidnap of one woman who showed no signs of aggression or acted in anything other than a peaceful way at any time.

20. The man commonly called David Brown trading as Senior Constable D. BROWN then proceeded to violate my private property by removing my private registration plates and opening the bonnet of my car without my permission. The other Police Officers, one of whom was a man commonly known as Allan Clapham trading as Senior Constable A CLAPHAM and another of whom had the surname “Dole”, did nothing to prevent him doing so.

21. I requested permission to call my husband, Arthur, who was nearby, to come and get my daughter. This request was granted and I contacted my husband and explained that I had been arrested/kidnapped and that I needed him to take care of our daughter, who was still distressed at seeing her mother bullied and spoken to aggressively. She was also upset to notice the man commonly called David Brown trading as Senior Constable D. BROWN remove my keys from my car and place them on the bonnet of his car..

22. Arthur arrived at the scene, his courteous greeting to the man commonly called David Brown trading as Senior Constable D. BROWN being rudely ignored. He had taken some photographs as he walked up to us and the man commonly called David Brown trading as Senior Constable D. BROWN threatened him with arrest/kidnap if he took any more. Out of concern for the well-being of our daughter, Arthur desisted in taking any more. He was also treated very aggressively by the man commonly called David Brown trading as Senior Constable D. BROWN.

23. The man commonly called David Brown trading as Senior Constable D. BROWN then instructed Arthur to take our daughter and, I believe, instructed me to walk to the Police truck. I did not hear and, therefore, did not immediately do so because I was distracted by something Arthur was saying to me, whereupon the man commonly called David Brown trading as Senior Constable D. BROWN bent my wrist over it and squeezed it, causing me great pain and to use an expletive due to the pain I was experiencing. Even more aggressively he ordered me to the Police truck, still squeezing my wrist and pulling me roughly along. While there are no signs of injury to my wrist, it still pains me two days later.

24. My daughter was very distressed to see me handled in such a way and I could hear her crying for me as I got into the Police truck and was locked in. Arthur tried to speak to me through the window slits but it was too difficult and I was driven away, leaving my distressed daughter behind me.

25. I was taken into custody at Bowral Police Station and locked in a small cell. I was asked many questions, some of which I answered and some of which I didn’t, depending on what I felt to be their relevance to the situation. I requested that it be noted that the man commonly called David Brown trading as Senior Constable D. BROWN had deliberately used physical force to injure my wrist.

26. My private property, my handbag and its contents was seized and rifled through.

27. The man commonly called David Brown trading as Senior Constable D. BROWN continued to speak to me very aggressively whenever he addressed me. I apologised for swearing in front of him but did not receive any apology for his physical assault on my body.

28. At one point I heard the Police Officer in charge, a man commonly known as Gavin Halloway trading as Senior Constable G HALLOWAY ask the man commonly called David Brown trading as Senior Constable D. BROWN whether he wanted to interview me. The man commonly called David Brown trading as Senior Constable D. BROWN replied that as I had refused to speak to me, he was not going to interview me. This was a lie as, in fact, the man commonly called David Brown trading as Senior Constable D. BROWN had not given me any opportunity to speak and had spoken over me every time I had tried to explain my situation to him. At no time did I refuse to speak to him, which leads me to the conclusion that the man commonly called David Brown trading as Senior Constable D. BROWN is a liar and not to be trusted. I explained to the man commonly known as Gavin Halloway trading as Senior Constable G, Halloway that I had never refused to speak to the man commonly called David Brown trading as Senior Constable D. BROWN.

29. I was asked to sign a piece of paper saying that I understood that my driver’s licence was suspended. I asked if I could write on the form and was told by the man commonly called David Brown trading as Senior Constable D. BROWN that I could write anything I liked on it. I added a sentence to the effect that I comprehended what the document said and signed it.

30. Later, after speaking to my husband on the phone, I requested the document back so I could add “All rights reserved” under my signature and that the document had been “signed under protest, duress and intimidation”. The man commonly known as Gavin Halloway trading as Senior Constable GAVIN HALLOWAY, allowed me to do so on my copy and said that he would request the original from the man commonly called David Brown trading as Senior Constable D. BROWN when he next came in.

31. Sometime later, the man commonly called David Brown trading as Senior Constable D. BROWN came into the room and made a great show of putting big crosses through some paperwork before turning to me and informing me that he had cancelled the document because he had changed his mind and was now “charging me”.

32. I have not seen or been presented with any material fact or evidence that show that:
the man commonly called David Brown trading as Senior Constable D. BROWN was not applying what he believes to be the law on the dictates of his whim according to his temper, and believe sincerely that none exists.

33. After approximately two and a half hours, I was informed that I could leave on the condition that I signed Bail papers. When I asked what would happen if I didn’t sign, I was told that I would be kept there for the weekend and taken to court on Monday morning. With four children to care for, one still being breast fed, I felt I had no choice but to sign the papers, again under protest, duress and intimidation.

34. After I had been photographed and had my hand, thumb and fingerprints taken, I was on the point of being released when I asked about the procedure where what was probably a caution was changed to a charge, the man commonly known as Gavin Halloway trading as Senior Constable G.HALLOWAY said that it was probably no longer applicable. As the man commonly called David Brown trading as Senior Constable D. BROWN then entered the room, it was suggested I ask him, which I did. He confirmed that the paperwork had been no longer applicable due to the fact that he had decided to charge me instead. I asked whether that change due solely to a change of mind on his part and he confirmed that this was the case. As he was still speaking very aggressively to me so I asked him, as I had done on other occasions, why he was speaking to me that way as I was not being aggressive towards him and only wanted to comprehend the process. He told me to, “Get out!” twice and then led the way to the public entrance. “When I asked him whether my husband was waiting inside he replied, “I don’t care!”

35. After leaving the Police Station, I found my husband, a friend and my sleeping daughter waiting for me. As we talked, we noticed that the man commonly called David Brown trading as Senior Constable D. BROWN was around the side of the Police Station watching us. Arthur said that he had been coming in and out and staring at them during the time they had been waiting for me.

36. Arthur decided to go and talk to him and our friend and I saw him approach the man commonly called David Brown trading as Senior Constable D. BROWN. We could not hear the words spoken but we saw the man commonly called David Brown trading as Senior Constable D. BROWN move extremely aggressively towards Arthur and take his baton out. They continued to talk for a few moments until Arthur moved back out into the street, with the man commonly called David Brown trading as Senior Constable D. BROWN following him closely. Arthur called to me to take the stroller so the man commonly called David Brown trading as Senior Constable D. BROWN could hit him. The man commonly called David Brown trading as Senior Constable D. BROWN backed off and Arthur came over to us and said that he been verbally abused and threatened, even though he had remained non- threatening and non- aggressive at all times.

37. After starting to walk home, we decided we should report the incident. We returned to the Police Station and Arthur went inside and reported it to the man commonly known as Gavin Halloway trading as Senior Constable G.HALLOWAY. We then walked home in time to meet our other three children as they returned from school.

38. Upon reading the “Full Facts” section of the Court Appearance Notice I was forced to sign, I found several mistakes and lies. Besides the spelling mistakes and reference to myself, a woman, as “he”, it says that I was handcuffed because “there is intelligence to suggest (sic) that the accused may become violent”. I have not seen or been presented with any material fact or evidence that show that I am a violent woman, and believe that none exists.

39. On lines 15, 16, 17 and 18 of page 3, an extremely badly written sentence seems to suggest that I tried to resist giving my daughter to my husband, whereas I maintained my grip on her because my husband had not noticed that I was being pulled towards the Police truck and had not yet got a secure hold on her. Therefore, I maintained my hold to prevent her falling to the ground. The man commonly known as David Brown trading as Senior Constable D. BROWN appeared to have no such concerns for her safety as he continued to pull me as I was calling to my husband to take our child. Needless to say, her distress was amplified by this experience.

40. On lines 30 and 31, there are references to my supposed resistance to being arrested/kidnapped. I did not resist arrest/kidnap and have not seen or been presented with any material fact or evidence that shows otherwise and I believe sincerely that none exists.

41. In the ANTECEDENT on page 2 of the COURT ATTENDANCE NOTICE, I am referred to as “part of some clan”. Clan means “blood relations” and “family”. I am indeed part of the Cristian family and dislike the inference that, by using this word, I am not the same, or nor to be treated the same as, any other man or woman in Australia.

42. Throughout page 2 of the FACTS SHEET I am referred to as “the accused”, again suggesting a slur on my good name and forming an opinion before the facts are known.

43. As a result of this manufactured controversy on the part of New South Wales Police Service and their deliberate disturbance of the peace, my entire family has been deeply affected, with my children being deeply distressed. I have not seen or been presented with any material fact or evidence that show that: the treatment I received at the hands of the New South Wales Police Service was not that usually reserved for criminal offences rather than for an alleged non-violent, non-criminal traffic offence.

44. I have not seen or been presented with any material fact or evidence that show that: the man commonly known as David Brown trading as Senior Constable D. BROWN is not in violation of any fundamental human rights, his Australian government has foresworn to uphold international covenants on civil and political rights, principles and protocols afforded to all people and innocent parties, by participating in and/or being the primary liability as the drawer of commercial written instruments by generating any complaint(s) against me, and believe sincerely that none exists

45. I have not seen or been presented with any material fact or evidence that show that: the man commonly known as David Brown trading as Senior Constable D. BROWN is not in violation of any fundamental human rights, the Australian and/or New South Wales government has foresworn to, in international covenants on civil and political rights, principles and protocols afforded to all people and innocent parties, by generating a complaint against Fiona Caroline Cristian if all witnesses, presented to date are unable or unwilling to sign a detailed complaint affidavit under their full commercial liability, as being matters of which the respective testifiers have first-hand-personal-knowledge thereof, and believes sincerely that none exists

46. I have not seen or been presented with any material fact or evidence that show that: the man commonly known as David Brown trading as Senior Constable D, Brown, an employee of New South Wales Police Service is not in violation of his fiduciary duty/ies, and oath of office/warrant of office as agent or employee, and believe sincerely that none exists

47. I have not seen or been presented with any material fact or evidence that show that: the man commonly known as David Brown trading as Senior Constable D. BROWN, an employee of New South Wales Police Service is not in breach of his fiduciary duty, and oath/warrant of office, if he fails to verify the complaint(s) against me before commencement of any lawful or legal proceedings, and believes sincerely that none exists.

48. I have not seen or been presented with any material fact or evidence that show that: the man commonly known as David Brown trading as Senior Constable D. BROWN might NOT bear the liability under the primary liability that befalls ‘makers’ of instruments, especially those who rely upon the honoured party presented with the maker’s instrument, going into a dishonour, when the honouree does a full acceptance (ergo, honours) their draft, and believe sincerely that none exists.

49. I have not seen or been presented with any material fact or evidence that show that:
I did not accept the presentment offered me by the maker and that I have not now surrendered it to the maker in timely manner for settlement and closure, and believe sincerely that none exists.

50. I have not seen or been presented with any material fact or evidence that show that:
a Bill Of Exchange instrument surrendered timely to the maker does not discharge any and all liability of any third party and does not shift the liability back to the maker, and believe sincerely that none exists.

51. I have not seen or been presented with any material fact or evidence that show that:
should the maker of the Bill Of Exchange instrument/presentment not accept the presentment from the third party that it does not automatically waive the obligation or liability on the third party, and believe sincerely that none exists.

52. I have not seen or been presented with any material fact or evidence that show that:
the presentment ‘NOTICE TO APPEAR’ is not an offer to the addressee to attend a court hearing and that the presentment is not a negotiable instrument, and believe sincerely that none exists

53. I have not seen or been presented with any material fact or evidence that show that: the man commonly known as David Brown trading as Senior Constable D. BROWN, an employee of New South Wales Police Service has first-hand-personal-knowledge that the Principal is ‘commercially operating’ anything and not assisting people to maintain "clean hands” in equity, and believe sincerely that none exists

54. I have not seen or been presented with any material fact or evidence that show that: the man commonly known as David Brown trading as Senior Constable D. BROWN has first-hand-personal-knowledge that I am not neutral to the "phenomena" and doctrines of religion, politics and philosophy in which the commercial, economic and monetary system of justice has been established and developed and furthermore that I am esoterically or in any other manner contracted or desires to be contracted therein, in any way, shape or form, and believe sincerely that none exists

55. I have not seen or been presented with any material fact or evidence that show that: the man commonly known as David Brown trading as Senior Constable D. BROWN, an employee of New South Wales Police Service has first-hand-personal-knowledge that I do not live by need and necessity and instead by reward and privilege, in order to honourably maintain my “clean hands” in equity, and believe sincerely that none exists

56. I have not seen or been presented with any material fact or evidence that show that: the man commonly known as David Brown trading as Senior Constable D. BROWN, an employee of New South Wales Police Service has first-hand-personal-knowledge that I, in my affairs, practices and social relationships am not helping all people achieve their full potential in having a peaceful and happy life by improving the lives of living-breathing-free men and women in the private venue, and believe sincerely that none exists.

57. I have not seen or been presented with any material fact or evidence that show that: the man commonly known as David Brown trading as Senior Constable D. BROWN, an employee of New South Wales Police Service has first-hand-personal-knowledge that I was not within my rights to conduct my personal affairs in a private capacity without interference from the public, and believe sincerely that none exists

58. I have not seen or been presented with any material fact or evidence that show that:
The man commonly known as David Brown trading as Senior Constable D. BROWN, an employee of New South Wales Police Service have first-hand-personal-knowledge that I am ‘operating in the public venue’ and not operating on the presumption that I, do NOT see myself as a private living-breathing-life-force free woman, and not as artificial construct or entity in privity and with full knowledge and disclosure with any corporate government, and believe sincerely that none exists

59. I have not seen or been presented with any material fact or evidence that show that: the man commonly known as David Brown trading as Senior Constable D. BROWN, an employee of New South Wales Police Service, has first-hand-personal-knowledge that I am NOT correct in acting on the presumption that I do NOT see myself as anything other than a private living-breathing-life-force free woman, and NOT as dead-at-law corporate fiction created by government for the purpose of interacting with them in commerce, and believe sincerely that none exists.

60. I have not seen or been presented with any material fact or evidence that show that: the man commonly known as David Brown trading as Senior Constable D. BROWN, an employee of New South Wales Police Service and/or any other party(s) to this matter, did not collude to cause untold stress as a result of intimidation and bullying of Principal, and for which they should not be personally liable, and believe sincerely that none exists

61. I have not seen or been presented with any material fact or evidence that show that: Liability for any damages or injuries caused me by the seditious acts and actions of purported ‘complainants’ does not shift to the man commonly known as David Brown trading as Senior Constable D. BROWN, for failure to correct his delinquency of office by refusal to withdraw his unsubstantiated claim and for disrupting my life, and believe sincerely that none exists

62. I have not seen or been presented with any material fact or evidence that show that: the man commonly known as David Brown trading as Senior Constable D. BROWN an employee of New South Wales Police Service has first-hand-personal-knowledge that if I elect to ‘operate in the public venue’ under a licence, that said ‘licence’ would not be for the sole purpose of permitting me to ‘access’ those commercial government-created entities, not under the protection of their creator justified in origin, and believe sincerely that none exists

63. I have not seen or been presented with any material fact or evidence that show that:
the man commonly known as David Brown trading as Senior Constable D. BROWN can show that by failing to show evidence that I possessed a New South Wales Licence, that they can lawfully, legally and successfully prove their attempt to exert alleged authority and the use of brute force against me is not a false and fraudulent claim, and believes sincerely that none exists.

64. I have not seen or been presented with any material fact or evidence that show that: if New South Wales Police Service and the man commonly known as David Brown trading as Senior Constable D. BROWN has a lawful pre-existing contract with me and that I subsequently willingly entered into contract and voluntarily surrendered my free Woman and free will status and sub-ordinated myself to that of a serf, and believe sincerely that none exists.

65. I have not seen or been presented with any material fact or evidence that show that:
any alleged agreement or contract consummated at the point of a gun or by any form of duress and without the free will consent of all the parties to it does not render the agreement or contract void, and believes sincerely that none exists.

66. I have not seen or been presented with any material fact or evidence that show that:
The presentments ‘offered’ to me were not created when I was under extreme duress and accepted under duress and now surrendered to the maker for value for settlement and closure,

67. I have not seen or been presented with any material fact or evidence that show that:
the man commonly known as David Brown trading as Senior Constable D. BROWN can show there is any contract between him and myself or FIONA CAROLINE CRISTIAN that was entered by voluntary agreement or by consent, and believe sincerely that none exists.

68. I have not seen or been presented with any material fact or evidence that show that: the man commonly known as David Brown trading as Senior Constable D. BROWN can show I refused any presentments and offers from him and did not conditionally and honourably accept all offers and presentments, and believe sincerely that none exists

69. I have not seen or been presented with any material fact or evidence that show that: I was not placed in the untenable position of involuntary servitude and a temporary slave/chattel of the man commonly known as David Brown trading as Senior Constable D. BROWN and believe sincerely that none exists

70. I have not seen or been presented with any material fact or evidence that show that: the man commonly known as David Brown trading as Senior Constable D. BROWN produced a warrant to enter/invade my private property, and believe sincerely that none exists

71. I have not seen or been presented with any material fact or evidence that show that: the man commonly known as David Brown trading as Senior Constable D. BROWN attained consent, tacit or otherwise, from me, to enter/invade my private property, and believe sincerely that none exists

72. I have not seen or been presented with any material fact or evidence that show that: the man commonly known as David Brown trading as Senior Constable D. BROWN did not unduly interrupt, interfere with, obstruct, prevent or stop me from going about my private affairs, and believe sincerely that none exists

73. I have not seen or been presented with any material fact or evidence that show that:
the man commonly known as David Brown trading as Senior Constable D. BROWN can show it was not my intent to settle the matter privately, promptly and honourable without harm to any living being, and believe sincerely that none exists.

74. I have not seen or been presented with any material fact or evidence that show that: he man commonly known as David Brown trading as Senior Constable D. BROWN did not have any understanding of his dishonourable personal conduct, and believe sincerely that none exists

75. I have not seen or been presented with any material fact or evidence that show that: The man commonly known as David Brown trading as Senior Constable D. BROWN an employee of New South Wales Police Service can sustain an inaccurate record by way of sworn affidavit true, complete, correct, certain and not misleading under his own personal unlimited commercial liability, and believe sincerely that none exists.

76. I have not seen or been presented with any material fact or evidence that show that:
The man commonly known as David Brown trading as Senior Constable D. BROWN can show me in timely manner (within seven days of the date on this Affidavit) any law that evidences that, should they fail to withdraw their presentment ‘NOTICE TO APPEAR’ Number 745649980 I can not lawfully pursue and do not have the standing or capacity to pursue injury claims against them via counterclaim for the harm and injury they caused me and for their gross negligence and breach of oath of office to protect people among many other serious charges, and believe sincerely that none exists.

77. I have not seen or been presented with any material fact or evidence that show that:
The man commonly known as David Brown trading as Senior Constable D. BROWN can show by his conduct on the evening of 9th January 2009 in this matter, that he did not:
A) Breach their oath of office by failing to protect me or my rights
B) Breach their oath of office by failing to protect the peace, as peace officers, and by declaring war on me
C) Breach the peace themselves
D) Discredit New South Police Service by their aggressive and delinquent action
E) Ignore and fail to follow the laws of the State of New South Wales or Commonwealth Laws by raising controversies and interfering in the private affairs and lives of several people
F) Cause harm and injury to me and possibly others
G) Physically and verbally Assault, kidnap, rape and imprison me

78. I have not seen or been presented with any material fact or evidence that show that:
the man commonly known as David Brown trading as Senior Constable D. BROWN can show they have not sworn an oath of public office to protect people and to maintain and keep the peace as well as to uphold the law and that their actions do not evidence their breach of their public office and a series of breaches of the law, and believe sincerely that none exists.

79. I have not seen or been presented with any material fact or evidence that show that:
the man commonly known as David Brown trading as Senior Constable D. BROWN can show any law that evidences that he can not be held liable and accountable under his own commercial liability for his many breaches of the law, that they are above the law and not subject to the law, and believe sincerely that none exists.

80. Unless the presentment ‘NOTICE TO APPEAR’ number 745649980 is withdrawn by the author with prejudice, in timely manner (within seven days of the date of this Affidavit), this matter will be taken to higher authorities including New South Wales Police Service Superiors and the Federal Fraud Squad for investigation with the intent to prosecute criminal charges against the perpetrators.

81. This matter, if not withdrawn, may further implicate certain parties, who have breached their fiduciary duty and oath of office, because of their delinquency and gross negligence in not entering into the public record to leave the free woman commonly called Fiona-Caroline: Cristian alone and at peace.

82. This Affidavit will be produced in any court of law should the matter not be resolved privately beforehand.

83. Should the presentment ‘NOTICE TO APPEAR’ number 745649980 be withdrawn by the author in timely manner I shall require an undertaking by their superiors that the two men involved in causing harm in this matter be reprimanded and ordered to attend and participate in a re-education program that teaches how to address the free woman.

84. Unless I receive written communication from the maker of the presentment, within the next seven days of the date of this Affidavit, stating otherwise, it shall be taken by all parties in this matter as their agreement that ‘NOTICE TO ATTEND’ number 745649980 is herewith withdrawn and the matter is settled and closed.

85. I have enclosed an invoice for injuries sustained by me pursuant to the agreement achieved and evidenced by the enclosed ‘Affidavit of Notice of Understanding and Intent and Claim of Right’ and attached documents should the matter proceed to court (Attachments A. B, C. D, E and F).

With my humblest appreciation for your honourable services and assistance.

Further I saith naught

JURAT:

ss: Sworn to and subscribed before me, by the above-named party, as true, correct, complete, of personal knowledge and not misleading, on this Twenty Third Day of the Second Month in the Year of Our Lord, Two Thousand and Nine AD 2009.

Autographed :____________________________
Fiona-Caroline: Cristian©TM
Authorised Agent and Principal,
UCC1 xxxx-xxx-xxxx-x
All rights reserved.

Affirmed before me at _________________________New South Wales
on the 23rd February, AD2009.

____________________________________________Justice of the Peace

Fiona-Caroline of the family known as Cristian,
Principal,
UCC1 xxxx-xxx-xxxx-x
Post Office Box 1320
Bowral, New South Wales [2576]

Monday 23rd February AD2009

Bowral district/county ) Asseveration
Australia )
) L.S. ______________________________________________
) only in the capacity as beneficiary of the original jurisdiction

FIAT JUSTITIA, RUAT COELUM

Let Right Be Done, Though The Heavens Should Fall

I, commonly called Fiona-Caroline of the family known as Cristian, in my correct and proper public capacity as a beneficiary to the original jurisdiction, being of majority in age, competent to testify, a self realised free woman upon the land, my yes be yes, my no be no, do state that the truths and facts herein are of first hand first-hand-personal-knowledge, as true, correct, complete, certain, not misleading, so help me Yhwh.

AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF NOTICE OF REQUEST FOR FURTHER AND BETTER PARTICULARS

1. I am of legal age and competent to testify where required.

2. I have first hand knowledge of the facts stated herein.

3. I have not seen or been presented with any material fact or evidence that show that:
I am NOT a diverse party to FIONA CAROLINE CRISTIAN, and believe sincerely that none exists.

4. I have not seen or been presented with any material fact or evidence that show that: I am a resident, citizen, rate payer, tax payer and NOT a living breathing life force spirit within a body of a woman nor a child of the Creator commonly called ‘God’ or ‘Yhwh’, and believe sincerely that none exists.

5. I have not seen or been presented with any material fact or evidence that show that: I have NOT noticed the relevant parties in this matter of my intent to not harm any party and that I wish to conduct my private affairs in peace, harmony and goodwill and for the benefit of mankind, though I cannot prevent any party that cause or intends to cause me harm, from harming themselves, and that I shall notice them prior to any action I may take against them, out of my sense of a duty of care, and that I shall hold any aggressor personally liable for the harm they cause me if they wish to pursue their action against me, and believe sincerely that none exists.

6. I have not seen or been presented with any material fact or evidence that show that: I have NOT provided a duty of care by noticing those parties in authority at Issuing party that I shall hold any delinquent party liable for their delinquency and gross negligence should they fail to inform and notice their underlings in relation to the performance of their duties, that if any party injures or harms me in any many, that I reserve the right to and will hold the offender/perpetrator accountable and liable under their own commercial liability for their actions, and believe sincerely that none exists.

7. I have not seen or been presented with any material fact or evidence that show that: I have NOT now humbly instructed the relevant parties to withdraw ‘COURT ATTENDANCE NOTICE’ number 745649980 in order to settle and close this matter, and believe sincerely that none exists.

8. I have not seen or been presented with any material fact or evidence that show that: it is NOT my intent to go to my neighbour in order to resolve this matter
Privately, and settle promptly and honourably and that by my actions thus far, has NOT been my clear demonstration to verify my intent, and believe sincerely that none exists.

9. I have not seen or been presented with any material fact or evidence that show that: I am NOT a foreigner and living foreign to and without the State of New South Wales, and believe sincerely that none exists.

10. I have not seen or been presented with any material fact or evidence that show that: The offending aggressor, a man dressed in a blue costume, has NOT failed to reply to my written communication and therefore by his silence has NOT accepted and agreed that his actions were delinquent and negligent and made under his own authority for which he bears unlimited commercial liability, and believe sincerely that none exists.

11. I have not seen or been presented with any material fact or evidence that show that: Any order made by the Moss Vale Magistrates Court in this matter applies to me and does NOT apply only to the alleged offender whose name appears on the paper ‘COURT ATTENDANCE NOTICE’, and believe sincerely that none exists.

12. I have not seen or been presented with any material fact or evidence that show that: if my body is detained, assaulted, kidnapped or raped and any of my property seized, taken or with held from me in lieu of a mistake in identity with alleged offender and aforesaid party written on the paper ‘COURT ATTENDANCE NOTICE’, FIONA CRISTIAN, FIONA C. CRISTIAN or FIONA CAROLINE CRISTIAN that I can NOT and do NOT reserve the right to hold liable, press charges and make counterclaim for injuries against ALL the perpetrators in this matter, including but not limited to, the presiding Magistrate or Registrar in this matter should they issue a warrant or order to detain or otherwise apprehend the alleged offender but fail in their duty of care to their underlings, to educate or inform them to leave me alone and in peace, and believe sincerely that none exists.

13. I have not seen or been presented with any material fact or evidence that show that: I, as a free man and living life force spirit within the body of a man, I have any jurisdiction, energy or standing to be present at a hearing within any State of New South Wales court and that you can show you can NOT and are NOT able to settle and close the matter yourselves, as employees of the parties that created and hold title to the Cestui Que Trust, particularly if I consent, authorize and encourage you to do so, as the sponsor of the energy and credit to the public, and believes sincerely that none exists.

With my humblest appreciation for your honourable services and assistance.

Further I saith naught

JURAT:

ss: Sworn to and subscribed before me, by the above-named party, as true, correct, complete, of personal knowledge and not misleading, on this Twenty Third Day of the Second Month in the Year of Our Lord, Two Thousand and Nine AD 2009.

Autographed :____________________________
Fiona-Caroline: Cristian©TM
Authorised Agent and Principal,
UCC1 xxxx-xxx-xxxx-x
All rights reserved.

Affirmed before me at _________________________New South Wales
on the 23rd February, AD2009.

____________________________________________Justice of the Peace






Fiona Cristian Reply To State Debt Recovery Office
Part One: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/5742 - From 17th October 2008
Part Two: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6135 - From 18th December 2008
Part Three: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6295 - From 9th January 2009
Part Four: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6296 - From 14th January 2009
Part Five: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6375 - The Sick Puppy - From 20th February 2009
Part Six: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6390 - Police Officers, Sheriff’s Officers, Tow Truck Driver and State Debt Recovery Office Blatantly Ignore the Law To Rape, Pillage and Plunder The Private Property Of Fiona Cristian - From 11th March 2009
Part Seven: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6445 - Affidavit Of Truth - Letter To The Queen + Australia: Fascism is Corporatism - From 30th March 2009
Part Eight: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6652 - The Pirates Auction - From 4th April 2009
Part Nine: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/7073 - Arthur Cristian's Letter To Pru Goward MP - From 15th December 2009

The Cristian Family November 2006

Let's Build Our Community Immunity Community

The Establishments system of divide and rule competition and trauma is a cancer in our lives, to the extent that there is barely a corner left on earth that has not been affected and our bodies, brains and hearts have all been severely damaged. Our bodies are becoming weaker and sicker, our brains bombarded with more and more garbage and our hearts left to fade into the background so that we allow ourselves to be numb to the suffering all around us. While we like to kid ourselves about how nice and considerate we are, if we are truthful with ourselves, we have to admit that we are psychotic destroyers, determined to keep destroying even though our destruction is killing the earth that we need to survive!

Like abused children who don't want to be parted from their abusing mother, we continue to cling to the system that destroys us and the earth. Our terror of the unknown coupled with our fear of retaliation from the Establishment has us maintain the corrupt, diseased system we live under. Worried about the parking fines, scared of our neighbour's reaction if we do something different, stressed by the daily struggle to keep our loved ones fed and sheltered, we kowtow to the endless rules and regulations that are imposed upon us without our conscious permission. In other words, we continue to suck on the establishment nipple because we are too scared to stand up together and say, "We can do it without you".

The only way we are going to wean ourselves away from the private corporations that run our lives is by living without them. When we come together as a group, when we visibly demonstrate that we CAN get along together without their legislation, that we CAN grow our own food rather than kill ourselves with the junk in the shops, that we CAN take care of our own health without Big Pharma and take care of each other, and that we can do it all without money, insurance, government, courts, man-made laws/statutes, bureaucracies, corporations, institutions and dogma, then we will have broken the presumption that we can't.

BREAKING THE PRESUMPTION

Once we have visibly broken that presumption, how many of the brainwashed are going to be inspired to take off their shackles and take responsibility for their lives rather than submitting to endless third parties that tell us what to do and keep us divided?

As divided "individuals", we have no hope. As conscious co-creators of creation, we each uniquely become part of the Community Immunity that protects us all.

Most of us are held back by our belief in one aspect of fiction or another that has us put that belief on a higher standing than ourselves and those around us. We allow the dead, that which cannot walk, talk or do anything for itself, to have power over us and to traumatise us. Most of us are traumatised by our belief systems. The policeman who has been told to arrest/kidnap an innocent man or woman is in fear that he will lose his job, credibility, status, privileges and benefits if he does not do as he is told, the Christian is frightened of going to hell if he does not do as the Priest and Bible tell him or her. Parents cannot bring up their children as they like without interference from others, and our fear of the repercussions of not following our belief systems has us bend at the knees and say, "Yes. yes, yes," to yet more impositions, more rules, more regulations, more stress, more trauma and less and less and less freedom.

How can we find true peace and freedom when we put ourselves under the standing of dead fictions that traumatise us? How can we ever create community while we put all our energy into the fiction? All the energy we put into the fiction is sustaining it and adding to our trauma.

Remedy for the living can only be found in the living and can only be put in place by the living. Anything you believe in is only worthwhile if it creates freedom for you and everyone else, otherwise, what's the point?

Creating communities that still contract with the fiction will not make the fiction go away. Creating communities far away from the problem will not make the problem go away, just as your immune system setting off for your arm will not fight the cancer in your stomach! We expect our immune system to confront disease in our bodies, to tell it to go away. Conscious men and women confront the disease in our world and tell it to go away. They do not ignore it, or hope it will go away by itself, or leave someone else to do the job or think that it will resolve itself given time. They do not put on their rose-coloured glasses and think it will go away if we just look the other way. Creating communities far away leaves others to clean up the mess YOU helped create.

THE RESPONSIBILITY OF FREEDOM

With freedom comes responsibility and it is a bit much to think that we can all spend years and years contributing to the destruction of the earth and then go somewhere else without even picking up a sweet wrapper! With freedom comes the HUGE responsibility of cleaning up the mess but, if we want to return the world to its former glory, if we want our children and grandchildren to have something worth inheriting and if we want to say "Sorry" to creation (the earth, nature, ourselves and other), we have to put down our tools of fiction, roll up our sleeves, pick up our tools of creation and get to work with willing hearts and common purpose. Then, as we clean up with our children alongside us, planting trees, clearing waterways, nurturing gardens, building with love, so our children will learn how to love the earth instead of harming earth, how to love each other instead of harming each other and how to be willing co-creators of creation. If we achieve that, the future of the earth is assured as our children will not dream of harming it when they have been shown how to love it.

The question we have to ask ourselves is, " What does ANY of the fiction do for creation?" If we can't come up with anything that the dead can do for creation, then it needs to be on our clean-up list. The only problem is that those who enjoy great wealth and power gained by convincing men and women that they do need the fiction, will not be too willing to let their fiction go. This is where we need to stand up and be counted, united by our dream of peace, freedom and abundance, and protected by our community immunity, to say, "No! We do not want any more destruction and we do not want any more trauma. We have grown up and we do not need you and your divide-and-rule laws, regulations, money, head-u-cation, disease, fear, distrust, lies, secrets, governments, corporations, institutions and dogma. We are taking FULL responsibility for ourselves and the earth. Go away." It's not about putting all our energy into fighting them; there are already many doing that and getting nowhere. It is about being able to protect ourselves when they come knocking at the door looking for some revenue, a piece of the pie. We need to know how to get rid of them effectively so we can continue creating our dream of Community.

If you want things to stay as they are, perhaps you've got it good. Is your life too cushy for you to want to give it up for the sake of creation? Are you too scared to stand up and be counted? If your nervous about causing ripples because you have children, think about the future you would like your children to have. If we don't stand up for creation, who will? If we don't stand up for each other, who will? If we don't put aside our differences, who will? If we don't make a better world, who will?

Whether you are black, white or pink, Arab, Jew or Lithuanian, rich, poor or in between, let's forget about what we each think we need and start thinking about what creation needs. Let's come together and show that we can put our fellow men, women and children on a higher standing than our empty beliefs. Let's show that we put truth before lies, health before disease and love before hatred. Let's create a healthy body with NO disease.

Come to a Kindom workshop and let's work out together how to grow up, take responsibility and become our own community immunity.


Consciousness acts as the immune system, it confronts and neutralises any threat so that no threat exists.
Consciousness does not depart from the scene allowing the threat to continue.
Consciousness does not leave others to do the job of confronting and neutralising any threat.
Consciousness is creation and is who we really are.
When we are not acting consciously we have forgotten who we really are and we are no longer of consciousness.
Consciousness is community immunity.

There is no individualism in consciousness. Just as all our cells make up our body together so all of us and all of the earth make up consciousness together. While there is disease in our body, our bodies are diseased and are not safe. While there is death in consciousness, we cannot be truly consciousness. We have abandoned our stations in creation and let the disease in. We all need to band together to rid ourselves of this disease so the earth and ourselves can be healed once more. Individuals have no place in consciousness because they think themselves apart from everybody else. Our beliefs, be they Christianity, Judaism, New Age, Muslim or The Ringing Cedars, form our individualism, separating us from one another and ensuring we stay divided. Our beliefs (our individualism) cause us to be arrogant, ignorant, fearful, greedy, selfish, righteous, irresponsible and self-centered.

Individuals are unable to form community immunity. Individuals have fallen from consciousness, they are no longer of creation, instead they represent rebellion against consciousness. Individualism is unconsciousness which are the rules (the beliefs) of the divide separating the substance of MAN from the substance of MAN and EARTH. The conscious live for creation, they serve creation because creation is their life, is their body of life while the unconscious serve only themselves.

While those of us who see the remedy of Kindom remain isolated in different parts of the world, we will never achieve community immunity. Let's come together in great force in an area where we have caused lots of destruction and where lots of people can see us. With many many hundreds of us coming together to serve each other, demonstrating the Creator's way of life, out in the open, here in the Southern Highlands, in between Sydney & Canberra, we cannot be ignored. When we visibly demonstrate that we can care for one another, visibly provide all sorts of community services for free without a fee, visibly demonstrate the healing of many diseases and demonstrate that it is possible for everyone to be a winner and no one a loser and that true freedom, joy and abundance for all is easy to do, we will create a mushroom effect that will spread so fast and so far and wide that this spreading COMMUNITY IMMUNITY will cause the collapse of the Freemasonic World and with it the final death of the Western World Civilisation Of Commerce. The remedy is very very very very simple, it requires just us to serve each other, care for each other and love each other without needing any fiction to do so.

KINDOM WORKSHOPS - COME AND JOIN US IN OUR FIRST WORKSHOP
7th/8th March 2009
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6294

This workshop is a step towards Kindom (Do No Harm Community),
learning how to live with each other without money, insurance, government,
bureaucracies, corporations, institutions and dogma.
Learning how to serve one another and how to care for one another, providing community immunity.
Learning to tread lightly on the earth and do no harm in feeling thought, word and deed.

SERIES OF KINDOM WORKSHOPS

This 1st workshop, based around Inspector U.N Ravels work, is being created to bring friends of Kindom together so we can begin to create our community immunity together at the same time as we are learning how we can protect ourselves while we are still operating within the fiction and as we begin to step out. From this workshop will blossom a series of Kindom Workshops where questions like these will be explored and brought into practicality through the sharing of information and ideas................

How do we live with each other without the need for money, insurance, banking, commerce etc etc?

How do we grow food and care for each other?

How do we learn to serve each other?

How do we let go of our me, me, me, I, I, I brainwashing?

How do we become no ones sheep or shepherd, free from the constructs of religion, faith, belief and free from the need for third parties to tell us how to live our lives?

What does taking responsibility for our lives really mean and how do we do that?

How do we live with each other in peace and harmony, resolving issues and learning how to stop negative destructive issues from even arising?

How do we wean ourselves from the fiction that is so enmeshed in our lives?

How do we create our communities without interference from the establishment?

How do we heal all diseases (physical, emotional, brain-psycho-logical etc)?

How do we teach our children to be free without brainwashing?

How do we do no harm to ourselves, each other and the earth?

How do we tread lightly on the earth and live sustainably?

By bringing in those experienced to share their information on herbs, healing, growing food, permaculture, eco-friendly/sustainable buildings, community schools etc, we will all learn as we go along.

The benefits that arise from Kindom workshops are immense and will show us the steps we need to take. See you there!


Consciousness acts as the immune system, it confronts and neutralises any LIES so that no LIES exist.
Consciousness does not depart from the scene of LIES allowing the threat of LIES to continue.
Consciousness does not leave others to do the job of confronting and neutralising any LIES.
Consciousness is creation IS TRUTH and TRUTH is who we really are.
When we are not acting consciously we have forgotten who we really are and we are no longer of consciousness.
Consciousness is Community Immunity.

THE TEN STEPS OF KINDOM

Please read: The Ten Steps (Not Commandments) Of Kindom by Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life 23rd October 2008: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/5788

KINDOM DOCUMENTARY

We are shooting a documentary around the first workshop. We will be asking participants and possibly members of the public some of the questions above as well as the following...

Where do you see your place in this world in 5 years time?

What kind of world do you think we will be living in in 5 years time?

What are your concerns/worries?

What concerns/worries do you have for your children/grandchildren's future?

Do you have any ideas/remedies to fix these problems (please share your thoughts etc)

We will then edit all the filming and interject the remedy of Kindom here, there and everywhere to help Kindom stand out as the remedy which resolves all mans woes.

Welcome To KINDOM
A Do No Harm Community Of Conscious Creators
Truly Free - No Beliefs - No Ownership
No Ones Sheep Nor Shepherd

Please read:
Welcome To KINDOM - A Do No Harm Community Of Conscious Creators - Truly Free - No Beliefs - No Ownership, No Ones Sheep Nor Shepherd, Located in the Southern Highlands of NSW Australia, around 80 to 90 minutes drive South/West from Sydney: http://www.loveforlife.com.au/node/5204

For more on how we allow our beliefs to have higher standing than our fellow men, women and children, please read this unedited email correspondence: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/5086#comment-1145

The REMEDY that heals all MANS woes
Can only ever be found where MAN was before MAN fell from Creation
No Remedy will ever be found during the time of MANS falling from Creation

The time has come for many hundreds of us to come together and create a force of determined men, women and children that will break the stranglehold of "The Crown" and the secretive Freemasonic organisation at its beck and call. Its time to tell "The Crown" to get out of our lives forevermore. We don't need you anymore. While they are behind the scenes, none of us are safe, all of us are vulnerable to their bully boy tactics. They represent a threat to any of us who want to start a true Kindom because a true Kindom is for the living and has no place for the dead. "The Crown" is the head of establishment blood-line families including all European Royal Families, Aristocrats, Land Lords and High Priest-Hoods like the Jesuits, Roman Catholic Church and its Pope.

Remember, they are the ones behind the genocide of hundreds of millions of native cultures that have been decimated over the centuries because they represented a threat to "The Crowns" Civilisation Of Commerce being introduced into their part of the world. What makes anyone think that they will sit back while we form the communities that mean the death of their dead dream? The Crown's New World Order is being forced upon us whether we like it or not and, unless we do something about it, the opportunity to break away and create our community immunity will be taken away, with bullies like the one who arrested/kidnapped Fiona being sent round to those of us who protest. While there is still disease, there is not a healthy body and no one is safe.

KINDOM IN GREENWICH PARK
3000 Acres In-Between Sydney & Canberra
Not Too Far From Goulburn or Bowral

Part 1: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6305
Part 2: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6306
Part 3: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6320
Part 4: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6322
Part 5: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6321


[Note: Part 3 to Part 5 are being updated creating Part 6, 7, 8, 9. Please keep checking back over the next week or so. It is so very important to comprehend the distinction between the dead god of fiction and the conscious-living God of creation because everything that comes from the dead God of Fiction is the basis of all our problems and the remedies to all our problems lie with creation. In the meantime, please refer to this link: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/5086#comment-1145 where this and other postings, above and below, provide a lot of information about this most important topic.]

Fiona Cristian Reply To State Debt Recovery Office
Part One: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/5742 - From 17th October 2008
Part Two: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6135 - From 18th December 2008
Part Three: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6295 - From 9th January 2009
Part Four: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6296 - From 14th January 2009
Part Five: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6375 - The Sick Puppy - From 20th February 2009
Part Six: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6390 - Police Officers, Sheriff’s Officers, Tow Truck Driver and State Debt Recovery Office Blatantly Ignore the Law To Rape, Pillage and Plunder The Private Property Of Fiona Cristian - From 11th March 2009
Part Seven: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6445 - From 3rd April 2009
Part Eight: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6652 - The Pirates Auction - From 4th April 2009
Part Nine: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/7073 - Arthur Cristian's Letter To Pru Goward MP - From 15th December 2009
Part Ten: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/7500 - Should We Be In Fear Of Those Who Claim To Protect Us? "Roman Cult" Canon Law - Ecclesiastical Deed Poll - The Work Of Frank O'Collins - From 13th October 2010

Kindom Workshop information is located here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6294

See you at the workshop.

Conscious Love Always
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
action @ loveforlife.com.au
www.loveforlife.com.au
PO Box 1320 Bowral 2576 NSW Australia
0418 203204 (int: 0011 61 418 203204)

AttachmentSize
Signed Doc Gavin Halloway _0001.pdf169.5 KB
Court Attendance Notice.pdf1.01 MB
Custody Management Report.pdf571.17 KB
Bail Undertaking.pdf422.32 KB
Reason For Bail Decision.pdf255.98 KB
Property Docket.pdf207.01 KB
Tony Kelly NSW MP Police Customer Service.pdf178.02 KB
Presentments Of David Brown Accepted For Value.pdf3.41 MB

Comments

The driving debacle & a serious question...

Wow, I was genuinely laughing at this until I realised this isn't meant to be funny and then I started to worry. I am completely blown away by the way you both handled this situation, talk about creating enormous and divisive drama over something which, deep down, you know full well is wrong, all in front of a child. I have concerns for when your child really needs to reach out to the Police but have an inbuilt distrust and fear based on your actions and teachings.
Aside from that, the big question I have is this: Hypothetically speaking, had Fiona accidentally run over 1 of my children or an income earner of my family, where would I stand in regards to ensuring financial viability for the potentially long term rehabilitation requirements, or in the case of an income earner being taken out of the income pool, not losing our house because of YOUR actions due to knowingly driving whilst you were uninsured ?! Do you have a vast fortune which you would dig into to ensure we are returned to our full health (or best part of), cover our financial responsibilities to ensure we keep the roof over our head that we worked extremely hard for ?
I know this all happened a while ago but I'd really like to know if you are still driving around unregistered, uninsured & unlicensed??? Regardless of your, near cult-like dreams of a "big family" bearing no social responsibility, you are (like it or not) already within a society that holds responsibility not only to themselves but to others through appropriate insurance.

Re: The driving debacle & a serious question...

"The System" with all its actors/re-presentatives operate under limited liability, not full liability.
Suggest you watch the videos embedded below like:
Ben Lowrey Interviews Arthur Cristian - 8th February 2012
and
The "Name" Is The Mark Of The Beast The Strawman Identifying Your Slave Status In "The System"
and
The Dream Of Life Part 6 - Under The Spell Of Intellectual Property
A few more videos will be posted in the near future.
All the best
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life

LINKS

Link To Find A List Of All
Articles, Debates, Discussions, Videos & Podcasts
By Arthur & Fiona Cristian

http://loveforlife.com.au/node/3385

SONGS

Song - Save Our Lives - Rough Demo - With Lyrics
Written By Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life
August 2007 - 5 Minutes 38 Seconds

Song - Celebrate Death To The Living - Rough Demo - With Lyrics
Written By Hannah Wood & Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life
July 2012 - 6 Minutes 30 Seconds

RECENT ARTICLES / DEBATES / DISCUSSIONS

Control The Land
And You Control MAN On The Land
Displace MAN From Land
And You Turn MAN Into Slaves

Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life
April 2011 (Updated 14th September 2011)
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8237

Difference Between Limited Liability/Responsibility
And Full Liability/Responsibility

Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Facebook - 13th July 2012
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8295

Alloidal Rights/Natural Rights Is "Intellectual Property"
The Basis Of "Ownership"

Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Facebook - 19th July 2012
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8297

The Deception Of Alphabet Languages
Causing MANS Spiritual Suicide
The True Purpose Behind The Invention
Of Phonetics & Etymology

Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life - 20th July 2012
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8299

The Dual In Duality
Trapped In The Reflection Of 'i" Projection

Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life - 3rd August 2012
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8301

We Are Saying That "Going Within" Or "Going Without"
Is Non-Sense, Is "Intellectual Property",
Is Part Of The "System Science" "Spells"

A Facebook Discussion & Debate
By Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life - 8th to 11th August 2012
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8302

Yellow Never Told Us It Was Yellow
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
12th September 2012
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8319

The Non-Sense Obstacles
Of The "Sustainability Movement"
How The "Haves" (Rulers)
Still Want The "Have Nots" (Slaves)

Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Facebook - 5th May to 2nd June 2011
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8178

Vortex Of Deactivation And Inactivity
Possible Facebook Espionage
Or Almost Undetectable Hacking

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
24th August 2012
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8316

REMEDY

Links to "The Steps Of Kindom"
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8304
or
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8256
or
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/5788

Link to "The Steps Of Kindom Background"
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8305

VIDEOS

Love For Life Kindom Garden Bowral
Created By 18 Year Old Aidan

5th December 2012
4 Minutes 27 Seconds
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8344

Ben Lowrey Interviews Arthur Cristian
Love For Life - 8th February 2012

95 Minutes 28 Seconds

The "Name" Is The Mark Of The Beast The Strawman
Identifying Your Slave Status In "The System"

By Arthur Cristian - Love For Life - www.loveforlife.com.au
5th February 2012 - 56 Minutes 25 Seconds

The Dream Of Life Part 6 - Under The Spell Of Intellectual Property
Arthur Cristian - 51 Minutes 52 Seconds

The Dream Of Life - Part 5A - System Science Is Fraud And The Timeline Of Chaos
Arthur & Fiona Cristian - 57 Minutes 35 Seconds

The Dream Of Life - Part 5B - System Science Is Fraud And The Timeline Of Chaos
Arthur & Fiona Cristian - 67 Minutes 26 Seconds

The Dream Of Life - Part 5C - System Science Is Fraud And The Timeline Of Chaos
Arthur & Fiona Cristian - 67 Minutes 25 Seconds

The Dream Of Life - Part 5D - Images Of Deception
The Intelligence Agents Amongst Us
"We Will Lead Every Revolution Against Us"

Arthur & Fiona Cristian - 44 Minutes 53 Seconds

The Dream Of Life - Part One
Arthur Cristian - Love For Life
62 Minutes 47 Seconds

The Dream Of Life - Part Two
Arthur Cristian - Love For Life
83 Minutes 47 Seconds

The Dream Of Life - Part Three
Arthur Cristian - Love For Life
91 Minutes 10 Seconds

The Dream Of Life - Part Four
Fiona Cristian - Love For Life
57 Minutes 30 Seconds

Key To Kindom - Co-Creation Of Do No Harm Communities
Causing A Mass Exodus From "The System"

Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life - February 2011
24 Minutes 48 Seconds

Dream Of Life - Kindom Garden Update
4th February 2012 - Love For Life
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
17 Minutes 16 Seconds

Once Upon A Time by Fiona Cristian - Love For Life
Short Stories Recorded Mid 2009
8 Minutes 38 Seconds

Website: http://loveforlife.com.au
Email : action@loveforlife.com.au
Mobile : 0011 61 418 203204 - (0418 203204)
Facebook Arthur Cristian : http://www.facebook.com/arthurcristian
YouTube Arthur Cristian : http://www.youtube.com/ArthurLoveForLife
SoundCloud : http://soundcloud.com/loveforlife
Nimbit Music : http://www.nimbitmusic.com/loveforlife
Twitter : https://twitter.com/loveforlifemusi
Facebook Music : http://www.facebook.com/loveforlifemusic
Facebook Why Aren't We Free Discussion : http://www.facebook.com/164918753537287
Facebook Do No Harm Community : http://www.facebook.com/151811728195925
YouTube Love For Life Music : http://www.myspace.com/loveforlifemusic
MySpace : http://www.myspace.com/loveforlifemusic
Google + Fiona Cristian : https://plus.google.com/100490175160871610090
Register To The Love For Life Mailing List: http://loveforlife.com.au/content/09/05/14/mailing-list

Wow

I stumbled across this on the interweb and f..k me you are out there pussycat!

What The Hell Is Wrong With You?

I feel sorry for you and whatever your parents taught you or whoever decided to misguide you. You have been charged with serious offences relating to not following the rules of the road. You need to be licenced to drive a vehicle, love will not overcome some drivers who drive with no regard for road rules, hence they do not get a licence or do not pass testing.

You need to register your car, some people have no regard to maintaing their car for safety purposes and as such, unchecked the vehicles are rolling death traps. No amount of love will protect the occupants or pedestrians or other road users.

I hope your group never turn into some cults like in Waco Texas where main figure there raped underage girls. I hope theres no mass suicide planned either.

Spread the love. Follow the rules or stay off the road.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

15th June 2009 10.53am

While men and women refuse to take full responsibility for their feelings, thoughts, words and deeds, there will always be chaos. The Admiralty Law system we are under allows limited liability insurance, i.e. passing the buck and making something/someone else (INVISIBLE) responsible for our feelings, thoughts, words and deeds. "If I (a person/strawman/agent-in-commerce - a fiction) don't maintain my car, I will be stopped by the police officers", i.e. it's up to them to make sure I comply, whereas, of course, we should be saying to ourselves, "I need to maintain my car so I don't cause harm to anyone or thing", or "I won't drive a car until I have been taught how to do so safely."

Love for Life is all about taking FULL responsibility for our feelings, thoughts, words and deeds. It is about living together in communities where we care for one another so that no one is left without. Love for Life is not about under age sex or mass suicides or following the one in front as stupid-dumbed-down sheeple. Have you read the Ringing Cedars Books? http://loveforlife.com.au/node/1125 They have now sold over 12 million copies and will give you a good idea of where we are heading. There is lots of information you can explore here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/3385 about the body of the Love For Life work we have been creating since early/mid 2005.

A "license", "registration", "police officer", "statute", "man-made laws", "government", "state", "court", "magistrate", "barrister", "lawyer", "politician", "vehicle", "road", etc etc are 3rd party dead-corpse fictions, incapable of taking full-responsibility, hence the "limited liability".... meaning, lets perpetuate the present state of chaos because no conscious-living MAN (man, woman, child) will take full responsibility.

Will the MAN with consciousness/spirit/soul embodied hiding behind costume and title POLICE OFFICER DAVID BROWN take "full responsibility" for kidnapping Fiona and terrorising and traumatizing both Fiona and Xanthe? No he won't, because he relies on the dead-corpse fictions (see above) which he worships and places on a higher-standing than MAN, fictions that can't walk, talk, reason, contract, create, maintain them-selves of their own-free-will, offer no substance to benefit MAN or NATURE or EARTH and are incapable of taking full responsibility.

All men are equal - but the establishment believes that all men are equal but some are more equal than others, so through education/training (brainwashing) David Brown now believes that fictions have a higher standing than MAN! hence the limited liability = living in a make believe world of utter chaos.

DAVID BROWN will not take full responsibility for his actions and neither will his superiors, state govt ministers, fed govt ministers/politicians/public-servants/bureaucrats, the prime minister, the judges, magistrates, barristers, lawyers, NSW State Governor, Commonwealth Of Australia's Governor General, "The Crown" or Elizabeth Windsor take full responsibility for David Brown kidnapping Fiona. And so we live in a fairytale called The Western World Civilisation Of Commerce where no one takes full responsibility because they are too busy being actors in costume and title in a fairytale, therefore this civilisation (the fairytale) is based on a PLAY called CHAOS. So to protect the scam which benefits ONLY the establishment and its lackeys we have limited liability insurance as a cover-up while the establishment sucks up all the cream created by MANS fruits of labour (gifts) of creation.

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life

Coward

"Anonymous" you are a coward, and transparent - you obviously work for the police or something like it. Grow some balls, man. Peace.

WTF??

Are you calling yourself a coward or referring to one of the other "anonymous" people?

Nice threatening message, but at least you ended with Peace so I guess that makes it alright?

Watch Your Back - I'm Coming For You...

I'm coming for you...

THANKS FIONA for this lesson!

We should all do so!
Enough of slave regulations!
I see on the photo there is a milk mark on your T-shirt - you still nurse the child! How they can be so cruel, so inhuman! Shame on the law-shame on police - shame on all of them!
I wanted to donate but it seems that they have blocked the donation access - I can not choose the kind of the credit card!!!
LOVE&BLESSINGS&LIGHT from Switzerland
Jasmina

Shame on the law?? Shame on Fiona!!

Fiona failed to abide by laws. She might have got a ticket or a simple fine or similar had she just played the game.

She chose to refuse to play the game. The officer can not identify her to enforce the first law she broke. So he arrested her.

She has her crazy agenda and beliefs, but they do not fit with society. She put herself in that position and pushed it to the point where she got arrested. SHE did that while her child was in the car. Police don't pick and choose when people break the law. They enforce it. SHE broke it and got herself arrested when it was not necessary.

SHE caused her child trauma by putting herself in that position. SHAME ON HER!!! How dare she!!!

Police pull over thousands of people every day. They don't all get arrested because of their own stupidity, and often those that do, realise their mistakes and own up to it, but Fiona is delusional and is blaming someone else for something she did.

You might be able to get away with breaking the law in Switzerland, but here in Australia,we (the majority of us anyway) live happy lives while living within the contraints of society. It just seems to be fringe dwelling morons like these (and presumably you if you are willing to donate money to their screwed up cause) who seem to have problems with it. And for some reason you will no doubt think that I am living a crazy existence, puttin gup with society's rules and should live a free existence. Well how is that working for you? Seems to be causing Fiona and her family nothing but grief, and yet I am happily making a living and raising my family.

Re: Fiona's Arrest

-----Original Message-----

From: Thomas
Sent: Sunday, 22 February 2009 5:45 PM
To:

Subject: Fiona's arrest

If you haven't already seen this:

http://www.loveforlife.com.au/node/6375

Fiona's forced arrest for journeying in peace and the accompanying Policy Enforcement documents such as bail form, are all downloadable as PDF's for your interest, research and learning.

Perhaps the collective consciousness can work out the answer to this travelling in peace business, because Mark has had issues, and I have as
well in the past, with bully police officers. There must be a way to compel whoever is in charge to provide proof that we do not have the right to
travel.

I noticed one of the charges was "Use unregistered registerable Class A Motor Vehicle." and they had searched for the car's VIN's but only found one in the firewall apparently.

Best
Thomas

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi Thomas,

This is a very sad story and one that highlights what the rest of us may be invariably subject to at times.

It has been my belief for the last 2 or 3 years that we will have to 'burn' a few of these government officials in the courts by taking the shirts off their backs, in order for a precedence to be set and for the others to sit up and take notice of us.

The difficult part, I believe, is in getting the right procedures to fulfil this and getting a judge or magistrate to actually make a ruling in our favour that absolutely (financially) annihilates a few of our transgressors who cause us pain and suffering.

Once it's been done, I'm certain that the word will spread like wildfire and we will be subject to less and less harassment and intimidation.

I think we must start focusing on demanding our right of way and pursuing pecuniary damages against these offending parties.

Regards,

Garth.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dearest All,
Robert always says that we should summons e.g. the Commissioner of Police and the Police Minister for example (the ones in charge of journeying in peace without a licence) to court for their questioning as a party for example.

In Germany you can summons a party when you wish them to act, not act/stop doing what they are doing (not do something that they have been doing in the past, which was harmful to you) or e.g. for damages.

If they do not show up you can then request the orders of the court.

Cheers with lots of love and light
b

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi Britta Dear.
That is exactly what I am teaching at workshops and also put into my hard hitting docs addressed to the CEO or top dog of an organisation. Unless they instruct their underlings to perform, we will hold them personally liable for gross negligence, delinquency of office and breach of their oath of public office and we will subpoena them to court as material witnesses as to answer to their delinquency and gross negligence.

We ALWAYS get a result

That is how we will close em out.

Hope yuz well

Catch up soon
Bestest

Mark

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

23rd February 2009

Dear, Thomas, Mark, Karen, Phil, Ant, Peter, Robert, Adam, etc.......

In the fiction there is no such thing as a right procedure as in a remedy, a benefit of relief for the conscious-living!

How can there be? It is impossible.

How can what's dead

provide a right procedure for the living?

The fiction represents DESTROYED CREATION, meaning destroyed consciousness.

How the f... can destroyed consciousness








provide remedy for the conscious-living? It is impossible.

All that exists is creation. We are not heading to creation or heading from creation nor can we hide from creation because even hiding is an act of creation, a mad/insane one at that. We either are co-creating creation and expanding the consciousness of creation (of the living) or we are destroying creation (destroying consciousness - doing-harm to/destroying the living). It can only be one or the other. To destroy creation we must first destroy our consciousness before we are capable of destroying the consciousness of others including all other life-forms of creation (of consciousness) inanimate or not.

Once we (MAN) are DESTROYED (fallen from creation) we DESTROY creation

THE DESTROYED ARE DESTROYING

Once a conscious-living MAN falls into a fictitious character role acting in the fairytale (like all those above) they believe in they are no longer conscious of consciousness (of the real world where the living reside), they are now totally unconscious of real-life. Everything they believe in (man-made knowledge invented out of thin air - con-structs) forming the fictitious fairytale must be protected at all cost otherwise the fairytale collapses and is destroyed. Therefore the lost like those above survive their beliefs, placing the lies on to a higher standing than themselves (their real lives of substance), others (their real lives of substance) and everything else of conscious-living creation (of substance). When we place a fiction on to a higher standing than the living (of substance) we are dead. We are destroying substance (consciousness).

Again..... how can the dead (the above) provide remedy for the living????? They can't, it is impossible unless they return to the living.

The only remedy is to co-create consciousness (substance) with the living (of substance) meaning we must co-create Kindoms. A Kindom is the only remedy out of the fairytale. It's time we put all our waking time into co-creating substance (Kindom) all together with each other and f... off everything of the dead (both the character rolls in the fairytale and the fairytale) and this includes paper work and administrative procedures.

Why are we using what is dead (paper - paper work - read and write alphabet languages - mathematics - sacred geometry - commerce, con-structs invented out of thin air like administrative procedures, laws, rulings, statutes, private corporations, money-fiat etc etc) which does not create substance for us (of the living), destroys our substance because we are not creating any substance while our brain's imagination is focused on fiction, and even worse, we are fading away further and further into a state of unconsciousness while we are engaged with fictions because fiction is not capable of co-creating substance and bouncing back substance to us (of substance).

Let's all come together to create KINDOM here and now and this act of creation (of substance) expands and expands and expands and expands and expands until MAN and EARTH is substance without fiction again. This act of love (creation of substance/consciousness) invites the dead (the above) to return back to the living. This is how the dead (the above) return to the living. This is how we bring a final ever lasting peace for all.

SO, LETS ALL RETURN TO THE LIVING FIRST SO THE DEAD CAN RETURN TO THE LIVING AS WELL.

WITHOUT US CO-CREATING A LIVING WORLD THERE AIN'T NOTHING FOR THE DEAD TO RETURN TO!

LETS NOT WASTE OUR TIME ON THE DEAD AND WHAT'S DEAD!

I have written much about all this as found in these postings and the comments attached. Please study, learn and start expanding consciousness with each other EN-MASSE, hundreds of us all together at the same time caring for each other/serving each other. This is how we step out of the fiction back to creation. Its the ONLY way. There is no other way. This is the only remedy Thomas, Mark, Karen, Phil, Ant, Peter, Robert, Adam, etc. The remedy is staring us all in the face but we are still attached to the fictitious characters in the fairytale to use the remedy, and we can't use it until we step out.

ONE

KINDOM IN GREENWICH PARK
3000 Acres In-Between Sydney & Canberra
Not Too Far From Goulburn or Bowral
Part 1: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6305
Part 2: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6306
Part 3: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6320
Part 4: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6322
Part 5: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6321
Note; part 3 to part 5 are being updated
causing part 6, 7, 8, 9 to be created over
the next week or so.
Please keep checking back next week

TWO

http://loveforlife.com.au/node/5086#comment-1145

THREE

Fiona Cristian Reply To State Debt Recovery Office
Part One: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/5742 - From 17th October 2008
Part Two: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6135 - From 18th December 2008
Part Three: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6295 - From 9th January 2009
Part Four: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6296 - From 14th January 2009
Part Five: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6375 - The Sick Puppy - From 20th February 2009

FOUR

Many of our other postings here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/3385 particularly..................

THE WAY by Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life - 9th August 2008: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/5231

The Ten Steps (Not Commandments) Of Kindom by Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life 23rd October 2008: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/5788

Welcome To KINDOM - A Do No Harm Community Of Conscious Creators - Truly Free - No Beliefs - No Ownership, No Ones Sheep Nor Shepherd, Located in the Southern Highlands of NSW Australia, around 80 to 90 minutes drive South/West from Sydney: http://www.loveforlife.com.au/node/5204

The REMEDY that heals all MANS woes
Can only ever be found where MAN was before MAN fell from Creation
No Remedy will ever be found during the time of MANS falling from creation

In admiration with immense respect and brotherly/sisterly love for all of you
Arthur Cristian
Love For Life

Laws broken??

What laws were broken by the Police, may I ask?

I am sure the only laws in NSW that apply to the citizens of NSW are those implemented by the government of NSW, not by some fringe group of hippie wannabes that have no idea of the world they really live in.

God's highway??? Since when did God make highways? I thought it was made by man, from teh money given to the government paid for by taxes etc.

The fact that you do not wish to conform to society's rules does not negate those rules, only that you do not wish to abide by them.

The fact that you don't pay rego, whish IS against the law, then refuse to acknowldege that by refusing to hand over your licence, which is also aginst the laws of NSW, then promptly get arrested, shows that you are not only an idiot, but a bad mother for doing all that in front of your child and it was YOU that put her through that distress.

You expect to be treated right and go on about a Police Officer calling him a sick puppy (over and over again) for doing his job by stopping some deranged idiot like you from repeatedly breaking the law.

I admire the fact that you wish to live in some little fantasy world where everyone is free to do what they want bu that is not reality. Go and buy a huge piece of land, and do what you want on it, but you come into society and use it's facilities, then you do what society expects of you.

Alternatively you could check yourself in to mentla health facility and get some help. Good luck with that.

Re: Laws Broken??

Hello Anonymous this is Arthur here. Fiona will get to read your two comments hopefully this evening after the children are asleep.

Let me ask you this...........

Who is taking full responsibility for the kidnap of Fiona's body??????

Now keep in brain that........................

FICTION = not real, a fantasy, an illusion, a delusion, a fairytale, a man-made construct (idea/thought/image) imagined out of thin air, a dead corpse that can't walk, talk, eat, breathe, drink, shit, sleep, think, contemplate, observe, reason, negotiate, contract or create/co-create substance (consciousness embodied) of its own unique freewill and therefore requires MAN (men, women children with spirit/soul/consciousness embodied, with senses of creation sight-sound-touch-taste-feel-smell/scent) to activate, engage and interact with that fiction. MAN, Nature, Earth, All Life-forms of Creation, inanimate or not, can create/co-create the substance that is consciousness, that is LIFE, that is CREATION, which is provided as an equal-exchange-in-value (of life giving substance), to create consciousness. All fiction needs MAN to do the walking, talking, eating, sleeping, breathing, drinking, shitting, thinking, reasoning, negotiating, contracting, etc for it.

Now keep in brain that...............

The Law (of a private corporation) is a fiction
The High Court (of a private corporation) is a fiction
The Federal Magistrates Court (of a private corporation) is a fiction
The Supreme Court (of a private corporation) is a fiction
The District Court (of a private corporation) is a fiction
The Local Court (of a private corporation) is a fiction
The Judge, Magistrate, Registrar, Barrister, Lawyer, Prosecutor, Attorney, Notary, JP, etc (of a private corporation/s) are fictions
Statutes (of a private corporation) are fiction
License (of a private corporation) is a fiction
Registration (of a private corporation) is a fiction
Certificate (of a private corporation) is a fiction
Society (of a private corporation) is a fiction
Citizen (of a private corporation) is a fiction
Police Officer (a private corporation) is a fiction
Bowral Police Station (of a private corporation) is a fiction
NSW Police Force (of a private corporation) is a fiction
NSW State Govt (a private corporation) is a fiction
NSW Minister of Police is a fiction
Commonwealth Of Australia/Federal Government (a private corporation) is as fiction
Australia is a fiction
New South Wales is a fiction
The Governor General of Australia (of a private corporation) is a fiction
The NSW State Governor (of a private corporation) is a fiction
"The Crown" (of a private corporation) is a fiction
A Motor Vehicle (of a private corporation) is a fiction
Driving is a fiction (the car drives - MAN just steers and pushes peddles and pulls handles and presses switches etc)
State/Government Roads are fiction
RTA = Road Transport Authority (of a private corporation) is a fiction
The NSW Attorney Generals Office (of a private corporation) is a fiction
The Sheriff (of a private corporation) is a fiction
The English Language is a fiction
Sacred Geometry/Geometry is a fiction
Mathematics is a fiction
Commerce is a fiction
Money is a fiction
Credit is a fiction
Legal Tender is a fiction
Promissory Note is a fiction
Debt is a fiction
Bills of Exchange is a fiction
Currency is a fiction
Taxation is a fiction
Interest is a fiction
Mortgage is a fiction
Fine is a fiction
Penalty is a fiction
Bill is a fiction
Contract with a third party is a fiction
Insurance is a fiction

None of the above fictions (including many others not listed) will take FULL-RESPONSIBILITY for Fiona's Kidnapping..... they can't because they are dead corpses. THEY ARE ALL THIRD PARTIES AND IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR THEM TO BE FIRST PARTIES TO ANY AGREEMENTS WITH MAN BECAUSE THEY ARE DEAD CORPSES. Only MAN (with consciousness embodied - men, women and children conscious of consciousness) can be a FIRST PARTY.

Do you agree that ALL MEN (of MAN) ARE EQUAL?

or

Do you believe that ALL MEN ARE EQUAL BUT SOME ARE MORE EQUAL THAN OTHERS?

If all the above third parties are dead corpse fictions, who of the living (MAN), the FIRST PARTY, is going to come forward and take the responsibility for giving them/others higher standing than other men and women (of MAN)?

If anyone believes they are a FIRST PARTY with an inherent right or a god given right to a higher standing than others of MAN (FIRST PARTIES) please bring forward the incontrovertible evidence from the source (THE FIRST PARTY) who provided this right. We want the full name, full contact details including the address where this FIRST PARTY eats/shits/sleeps etc, phone/fax/mobile/cell numbers, email and internet address (if available) so that we can meet face-to-face with this FIRST PARTY and talk with this FIRST PARTY life-form, and if this source is God, A FIRST PARTY, we want to meet face-to-face with this God, to hear it (witness) from this FIRST PARTY God's own tongue that indeed God (THE FIRST PARTY) has provided the exclusive and privileged FIRST PARTY authority to represent God (THE FIRST PARTY) in the matters (administration) of God's affairs. If the authority is in a written form, we want to meet face-to-face with the FIRST PARTY author of this written authority who will back the claim that they have the God given right to declare that one or more men or women (of MAN - FIRST PARTIES) have higher standing than other men, women and children (of MAN - FIRST PARTIES) and can enforce this higher standing. We do not accept third parties because they are dead corpses.

Anonymous...................

Third Parties become the props, the infrastructure of a fairytale, of a dead corpse fictionalised world that has no standing over MAN, (FIRST PARTIES), they can't because they have no consciousness embodied and they are incapable of taking FULL RESPONSIBILITY either.

Also, any man, woman or child who believes they have a higher standing than other men, women and children and believe they have the law to back them or an inherent God given right to Govern or Rule or Use Force over other men, women and children are liars, deceivers, CON-artists and manipulators and are either terribly CON-fused (fused by the con) about reality or are driven by greed, selfishness, power and control and enjoy doing harm to other men, women and children by abusing them, ridiculing them, terrorising them etc, and are determined to cause fear and trauma and uncertainty so that they can maintain a brutal higher standing.

Anonymous.......... Who of the FIRST PARTIES is going to come forward to take FULL RESPONSIBILITY for the kidnapping of Fiona's body (the living MAN with consciousness embodied)? David Brown, the MAN acting as Police Officer DAVID BROWN? What about any of David Brown's superiors going right up the chain of command to the woman Elizabeth Windsor, Quentin Bryce, Marie Bashir, John Hatzistergos, Nathan Rees, Andrew Scipione, Tony Kelly, Pru Goward, Gavin Holloway, Peter Gillam or Hamish East, are any of them going to take Full responsibility for kidnapping Fiona's body?

Doesn't any of them have a conscience?

Or is it Casper The Ghost taking responsibility?

A MAN has to take full responsibility because he/she is not a third party dead corpse fiction. A First Party MAN needs to come forward taking full-responsibility for putting their energy/power of creation into this "ORGANISED ACT" of kidnapping Fiona's body!

Remember: it is impossible for third parties to organise a kidnapping, only a fallen-MAN (no longer conscious of consciousness) can organise a kidnapping and it is clear and plain for all to see, hear and comprehend that an organisation ACTING as a crime syndicate/terrorist organisation (of fallen-MAN) was behind Fiona's kidnapping as well as protecting, condoning and benefiting from this ACT of brutal terrorism as well as hiding this F-ACT.

First Parties are MAN (conscious-living men, women and children conscious of consciousness) co-creating LIFE with MAN in the real world called CREATION and MAN will not claim a higher standing than others of MAN because MAN does not support harm doing in any form whatsoever, is committed to provide an equal exchange in value (of life-giving substance) and sees all of MAN equal without distortions applied.

Which world are you living in Anonymous,

a) The organised dead world (a fairytale)?
or
b) the living world (reality)?

Which world do you represent, argue for, live for and defend?

In the fairytale that is the Western World Civilisation Of Commerce, did you know that in Black's Law Dictionary, 8th edition, it defines a statute as being "given force of law by the CONSENT of the governed"? This means that, if you do not give your consent the statute has no power over you, no force of law.

We, along with many others, would love to get a large piece of land and live Do No Harm lives with others, ignoring the deluded Western World Civilisation of Commerce which is a fairytale. Unfortunately the Western World Civilisation of Commerce does not allow anyone to do so (to leave the fairytale) without doing harm to them. Try it and you will find that you are constantly hassled for fictional money, hassled over how you use the water on your land, hassled over how you raise your children and whether you vaccinate them, hassled over how many people live on the land, hassled over the houses you build (even if they are totally environmentally friendly and sensitive to the environment)......

As we state in this posting: David Wynn Miller's Dead "Claim Of Life": http://loveforlife.com.au/node/3012#comment-1575 - "THE WESTERN WORLD CIVILISATION OF COMMERCE IS APOCALYPTIC BY DESIGN" and "The Western World Civilisation Of Commerce is an ACT of total destruction to MAN and Earth" and "The creation of SELF is the spiritual putrefaction process of MAN (conscious-living MAN)".

If you want to explore more deeply into the truth please study this 2 hour informal teaser video: http://www.greengardenearth.com/media/video/loveforlifeinterview.mp4 and the series of podcasts and document here: Let's Choose Real Freedom - The Only Remedy To The Incarceration of Free Men & Women by Arthur & Fiona Cristian 28th April 2009: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6511 and explore other postings (particularly the comments in some of them) here:

A Representative Of The NSW Jewish Board Of Deputies Has Threatened To Shut Down The Love For Life Website:
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6616

"Self" Destruction by Arthur Cristian - Love For Life 22nd June 2009:
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6639

David Wynn Miller's Dead "Claim Of Life" 22nd June 2009:
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/3012#comment-1575

The Rules Of The Divide Constructs Individualism by Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life - 7th May 2009:
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6558

Re: We Are Under Serious Attack Right Now....... Email Discussion with Arthur & Fiona Cristian:
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6616#comment-1521

THE WAY by Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life - 9th August 2008: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/5231

and others are found here: A List Of The Latest Arthur And Fiona Cristian Videos, Audios And Articles Posted To The Love For Life Website: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/3385

All the best
Arthur Cristian
Love For Life

ps: There is no such thing as taxation, tax is a 3rd party dead corpse, therefore is incapable of providing/creating any energy/power of creation to build roads, highways etc. Only MAN or fallen-MAN can create a highway through his/her fruits of labour. The Establishment and all its props acting as third parties are incapable of providing an equal exchange in value (of life giving substance) with MAN, instead they provide NOTHING of substance. All they provide is their copyrighted (right of copy) intellectual proprietary knowledge, ALL FICTION.

Anonymous.......... Who of

Anonymous.......... Who of the FIRST PARTIES is going to come forward to take FULL RESPONSIBILITY for the kidnapping of Fiona's body (the living MAN with consciousness embodied)? David Brown, the MAN acting as Police Officer DAVID BROWN? What about any of David Brown's superiors going right up the chain of command to the woman Elizabeth Windsor, Quentin Bryce, Marie Bashir, John Hatzistergos, Nathan Rees, Andrew Scipione, Tony Kelly, Pru Goward, Gavin Holloway, Peter Gillam or Hamish East, are any of them going to take Full responsibility for kidnapping Fiona's body?

Here's an idea. Maybe Fiona could tkae responsibility for it. SHE broke the law. SHE got herself in that position. SHE refused to hand over her licence. They are her responsibilities by law. If SHE doesn't like that, then too bad. That is society. It is not fiction (outside your warped brain). It is FACT. The Police are not a corporation. The government is not a corporation. The Police Officer is not "trading as" anyone. He is a Police Officer.

You are very warped in your thinking and the only similar ramblings I have read that compare to this are those of mentally ill people. Get help.

George

Okay, I kind of lost

Okay, I kind of lost interest in your rubbish when you wrote that the NSW Police was a corporation, but I soldiered on and got to the part where you rambled on about 3rd party this and that.

You sound like you have a mental illness and should seek help.

George

Everyone's a Winner

George,
I am suffering the same mental illness, can you please show where I can get help too mate?

By the way, check this link at Dunn & Bradstreet (International)

https://smallbusiness.dnb.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/IballValidationC...

Then tell us why the NSW Police, a government organisation is registered as a private corporation.

Cheers,
Bruno

At some point in Fiona's

At some point in Fiona's ramblings she asks this question -

Can anyone show us the law that says a free woman cannot travel the land in a car of her choosing?

Well without having to type endless amounts of dribble like you have (to prove nothing) I can provide you this:

Driving unregistered vehicles
Driving an unregistered vehicle is illegal and could have enormous financial implications for both the driver and the owner of the vehicle.
If your vehicle is unregistered, go to the 'Get a new rego' page (above left) to find out how to register your vehicle.
When your vehicle is unregistered your Compulsory Third Party (CTP) insurance is not valid. This means the driver will be held personally liable for any property damage resulting from an accident in which they are at fault.
The vehicle’s driver is also open to be sued by CTP insurers for any personal injuries coming from such an accident.
Driving an unregistered and uninsured vehicle is also an offence attracting on the spot infringement notice fines of at least $972 ($486 for being unregistered and $486 for being uninsured). If the matter goes to court, the maximum fine is $2200 for driving unregistered and $5500 for driving uninsured.
Some drivers believe that they can get away with driving an unregistered vehicle if they stick to the local streets around their home. This is not true – many accidents occur within a short distance of a driver’s home.
Unregistered vehicles can be driven for the purpose of obtaining registration by the most direct or convenient route:
to the nearest convenient motor registry, or
to the nearest convenient vehicle inspection station or authorised inspection station to determine whether the vehicle complies with the applicable vehicle standards, or
in the course of inspecting or testing the vehicle to determine if it complies with the applicable vehicle standards, or
to the nearest practicable weighbridge to determine the weight of the vehicle, or
from a motor registry or inspection station where the registration of the vehicle has been refused, to the nearest convenient place where necessary repairs can be made or where the vehicle can be garaged, unless a direction has been issued that the vehicle must not be driven before the necessary repairs have been made, or
from an authorised inspection station to the nearest convenient place where necessary repairs or adjustments can be made or where the vehicle can be garaged, or
to the nearest convenient office of a licensed insurer for the purpose of obtaining Compulsory Third Party (CTP) insurance, or
to the nearest convenient location for any other purpose directly associated with the registration process.
If you are caught driving an unregistered vehicle on any other route, you will be fined and police may remove the vehicle's number plates on the spot or they may seize the vehicle.
You can renew your registration in person at a motor registry, by phone, by mail or online myRTA

and seeing as you like just posting links to support your rubbish, I can even do that too

http://www.rta.nsw.gov.au/registration/otherinformation/drivingunregiste...

ANyone want to paypal me for the work too?

Poor Old Sheeple

Its sheep like yourself who are lead down the path to destruction and brainwashing by government deception that has you eating their crap like an addict, before motorized cars and what not people could travel freely, its all about control man, your lost in the system of b/s.........

Conditianal Acceptance With Little Dribble

Hiya Anonymous, good work.

I'll Paypal you $500 Trillion Dollars, as long as you can answer the question "Can anyone show us the law that says a free woman cannot travel the land in a car of her choosing?"

Could you post more links as you only posted one.

Best wishes to you,
Bruno the Raving Lunatic ;-)

Here's Another Link To The Traffic Act

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/nsw/consol_act/rtra1997387/s18.html

ROAD TRANSPORT (VEHICLE REGISTRATION) ACT 1997 - SECT 18
Prohibition on using unregistered registrable vehicles
18 Prohibition on using unregistered registrable vehicles
(cf Cth Act s 20, Traffic Act s 6A)

(1) A person must not use an unregistered registrable vehicle on a road or on a road related area.
Maximum penalty: 20 penalty units.
(2) Subsection (1) does not apply to the use of a registrable vehicle on a road or road related area if:
(a) the vehicle belongs to a class of vehicle prescribed by a regulation referred to in section 16 as a vehicle to which this Act does not apply, or
(b) the use is otherwise permitted by this Act or under the regulations.
(3) Subsection (1) does not apply to a registrable vehicle that was left standing on a road or road related area:
(a) within the period of 15 days after the date on which that vehicle ceased to be registered or to be exempted from being registered, or
(b) with the consent of the responsible person for the road or area.
(4) In this section:
"registrable vehicle" includes:
(a) an incomplete or partially constructed vehicle, and
(b) the remains of a vehicle.
"responsible person", in relation to a road or road related area on which a vehicle was left standing, means:
(a) if the care, control and management of the road or area was then vested in a person other than the owner of the road or area-the person in whom the care, control and management of the road or area was vested, or
(b) in any other case-the owner of the road or area.

Pretty simple really Bruno, isn't it.

Road + Car = MUST BE REGISTERED.

She can freely walk wherever she wants on her journey of peace, provided it is not on private land, or contravenes oteher laws or regualtions. She can even drive on the roads, provided she abides by the laws of the land. If she doesn't like that then too bad.

A Car Drives - A MAN Journeys or Travels

Dear Anonymous

A car drives
A MAN journeys or travels
It is impossible for a MAN to drive!
Only a car can drive!

------------

Dear Anonymous

MAN is the creator of all highways and byways

No fiction is capable of creating highways and byways

MAN is free to journey or travel on the creators highways and byways

------------

Dear Anonymous

You have avoided proving what I have already stated as wrong, in fact you have just completely avoided challenging almost everything I stated.

Why Is that?

As Bruno has already challenged you..... "Please show us the law that says a free woman cannot travel the land in a car of her choosing?"

You have found nothing yet!

By the way.... The Traffic Act applies only to Persons! Are you a Person Anonymous? Traffic is a build up of fictitious Person's driving motor vehicles. Yes, the traffic act applies ONLY to motor vehicles, it does not apply to cars or automobiles or to MAN/WOMAN! Did you know that?

Traffic is a fiction
Person is a fiction
Driving is a fiction
Traffic Act is a fiction
RTA is a fiction
NSW is a fiction
Motor Vehicle is a fiction
ROAD TRANSPORT (VEHICLE REGISTRATION) ACT 1997 - SECT 18 is a fiction
ROAD TRANSPORT is a fiction
VEHICLE REGISTRATION is a fiction
unregistered is a fiction
registrable is a fiction
Registration is a fiction
the list goes on and on and on and on and on.....

Not only are they in a prison of their own making but it is so sad to see the lost sheeple arguing and fighting as hard as they can to maintain their captivity.

They don't want freedom!

All the best
Arthur Cristian
Love For Life

Firstly, Did You Follow The Link To The NSW RTA Site?

Firstly, did you follow the link? It is to the NSW RTA site. All the info is there

ROAD TRANSPORT (VEHICLE REGISTRATION) ACT 1997 - SECT 18
Prohibition on using unregistered registrable vehicles
18 Prohibition on using unregistered registrable vehicles
(cf Cth Act s 20, Traffic Act s 6A)

(1) A person must not use an unregistered registrable vehicle on a road or on a road related area.
Maximum penalty: 20 penalty units.
(2) Subsection (1) does not apply to the use of a registrable vehicle on a road or road related area if:
(a) the vehicle belongs to a class of vehicle prescribed by a regulation referred to in section 16 as a vehicle to which this Act does not apply, or
(b) the use is otherwise permitted by this Act or under the regulations.
(3) Subsection (1) does not apply to a registrable vehicle that was left standing on a road or road related area:
(a) within the period of 15 days after the date on which that vehicle ceased to be registered or to be exempted from being registered, or
(b) with the consent of the responsible person for the road or area.
(4) In this section:
"registrable vehicle" includes:
(a) an incomplete or partially constructed vehicle, and
(b) the remains of a vehicle.
"responsible person", in relation to a road or road related area on which a vehicle was left standing, means:
(a) if the care, control and management of the road or area was then vested in a person other than the owner of the road or area-the person in whom the care, control and management of the road or area was vested, or
(b) in any other case-the owner of the road or area.

From what she posted, the "car of her choosing" is registerable vehicle under the Act. Pretty simple stuff really. You want to use the roads of society, you abide by the laws of society. I know that might be hard to understand to you, but it really is quite simple.

Don't worry about the paypal though, I wouldn't giv eout my details to some nut job like you anyway. And seeing as you now require an email address to reply on here, where you didn't yesterday, I assume you want some way of tracking me so I had to come up with a stupid yahoo address.

Oh great now I am sounding like some kind of paranoid delusional whack job too!!!

The Act Relates To A Person And Not To A MAN/WOMAN

Dear Anonymous
The act relates to a "Person"

Are you a Person Anonymous?

Have you ever looked up what a Person is?

Are you a private corporation?

Note: All Acts/Statutes (Of Law) Apply To A Person or Persons And Not To a Freeman/Freewoman (conscious-living flesh and blood MAN with spirit/consciousness/substance embodied). Please Look Up The Interpretation Of A Person:

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From Here: http://www.loveforlife.com.au/node/5967

Word Definitions From Blacks Legal Dictionary

Note: See Also Original Word Document Attached Below

Person:

In general usage, a human being (ie natural person – itself an oxymoron), though by statute term may include a firm, labour organisations, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers. National Labour Relations Act, S 2(1), Black’s 5th Ed P595

-------------------------

Award:

v. To grant, concede or adjudge to. To give or assign by sentence or judicial determination or after careful weighing up of evidence. Thus, a jury awards damages,; the court awards an injunction; one awards a contract to a bidder. To confer as being deserved or merited.

n. The decision or determination rendered by arbitrators or commissioners, or other private or extrajudicial deciders, upon a controversy submitted to them, also the writing or document embodying such decision. See also final awards.
Black’s 5th Ed P71

Consent: Implied Consent via inaction or silence

Registrar may say: ‘consent is not agreement’ so You may respond with: ‘That’s fine, let’s see what Black’s law dictionary says about ‘Consent’.’

If Registrar says ‘that’s not the preferred law dictionary we go with’

say: ‘That’s ok, but why then are there more Black’s Law dictionaries in universities then any other unless you are trying to mislead your future lawyers…….. so Black’s is obviously sufficient to use….’ Black’s 5th Ed P160

Mediation:

Intervention; Interposition. The act of a third person in intermediating between two contending parties with a view to persuading them to adjust or settle their dispute. Settlement of dispute by action of intermediary (neutral Party).

Also the friendly interference of a neutral nation in the controversies of others, for the purpose, by its influence and by adjusting their difficulties, of keeping the peace in the family of nations Black’s 5th Ed P508

Stipulations: A material condition, requirement, or article in an agreement.

The name given to any agreement made by the attorneys engaged on the opposite sides of a cause (especially if in writing), regulating any matter incidental to the proceedings or trial, which falls within their jurisdiction. Voluntary agreement between opposing counsel concerning disposition of some relevant point so as to obviate need for proof or to narrow range of litigable issues. An agreement, admission or confession made in a judicial proceeding by the parties thereto or their attorneys.

Stipulations made during the course of trial may involve jury of less than 12 (Fed.R.Civil P. 48), Masters findings (Rule 53(e)(4)), dismissal of action (Rule 41(a)), or discovery
Black’s 5th Ed P735

By simply asking the question

are you kind sir offering me a transaction in a crown security interest or not ?????????

either way he is screwed

yes ......... thank you kind sir therefore commercial arb act applies

no .......... well what am i doin’ here then ???? if dis aint a commercial transaction coz u would be able 2 do all this in my proper name instead of in an artificial capacity then wouldn’t you charlie horse?????????

says: so show me the corrected paperwork cookie boy

Is it NOT so that there are no more Common Law Crimes in Australia, they are all commercial

We are in foreign jurisdiction are we NOT?

Foreign to Australia, and therefore FOREIGN to the statute laws.

Therefore
1. no more C.L. crimes
2. Commonwealth Arbitration Act doesn’t apply to us, NOT subject to it

UCP 442, 444-446, 448, 449
UCP Part 8 Ch 131 P103 Letter of Request

I THEN LOOKED UP THE BUTTERWORTHS - This would be why the learned solicitor makes her statement - but it does not wash with Bankers Acceptance Law, now does it - otherwise they could not act just because of silence. Such a mind field of lies and innuendo.

"SILENCE:

Failure to communicate. A contract is not made simply by an offeree's silence after an offeror informs an offeree that silence in reply to the offer will be taken as acceptance, even if the offeree forms, but does not attempt to communicate, an intention to accept: Felthouse v Bindley (1861) 11 CB (NS)869; 142 ER 1037. See also Bilateral contract; Offer; Unilateral Contract."
What does Blacks say

‘Silence can be equated with fraud
Where there is a legal or moral duty to
Speak or where an enquiry left
Unanswered would be intentionally
Misleading ‘

Did a Southport magistrate during a court hearing in December 2006 NOT wave my Certificate of Dishonour In the air and call out, ‘what about This Certificate of Dishonour?’ in reply to a prosecutors rejection to the 3rd party intervenor’s tender of written Mutual agreement between the parties?

Silence:

The state of a person who does not speak, or of one who refrains from speaking. In the law of estoppel. ‘silence’ implies knowledge and an opportunity to act upon it.

Silence, estoppel by. Such estoppel arises where person is under duty to another to speak or failure to speak is inconsistent with honest dealings. Silence, to work ‘estopped’, must amount to bad faith, and elements of essentials of such estoppel include: change of position to prejudice of person claiming estoppel, damages if the estoppel is denied, duty and opportunity to speak, inducing person claiming estoppel to alter his position, reliance upon silence of party sought to be estopped.
Black’s 5th Ed P719

Affiant:

The person who makes and subscribes an affidavit.

The word is used, in this sense, interchangeably with ‘deponent.’ But the latter term should be reserved as the designation of one who makes a deposition.
Black’s 5th Ed P28

Agent:

A person authorized by another to act for him, one instructed with another’s business. One who represents and acts for another under the contract or relation of agency. Etc etc
Black’s 5th Ed P 32

Principal. Adj. Chief; leading; most important or considerable;

Primary; original. Highest in rank, authority, character, importance, or degree.
Black’s 5th Ed P 621

Principal. n. The source of authority or right. A superintendent, as of a school.
Black’s 5th Ed P622

Person:

In general usage, a human being (ie natural person – itself an oxymoron), though by statute term may include a firm, labour organisations, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers. National Labour Relations Act, S 2(1), Black’s 5th Ed P595

Undersigned: The:

The person whose name is signed or the persons whose names are signed at the end of a document; the subscriber or subscriber.
Black’s 5th Ed P 793

Summary Judgment:

Rule of civil procedure 56 permits any party to a civil action to move for a summary judgment on a claim, counter claim or cross claim when he believes that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that he is entitled to prevail as a matter of law. The motion may be directed toward all or part of a claim or defence and it may be made on the basis of the pleadings or other portions of the record in the case or it may be supported by affidavits and a variety of outside material. See also Genuine Issue, Material fact.
Black’s 5th Ed P 748

Fiduciary:

(as a noun ) ‘A person that holding the character as a trustee, or a character analogous to that of a trustee, in respect to the trust and confidence involved in it and the scrupulous good faith and candor which it requires. A person having duty, created by his undertaking, to act primarily for another’s benefit in matters connected with such undertaking.

(as an adjective) Of the nature of a trust, having the characteristics of a trust, analogous to a trust, relating to or founded upon a trust or confidence. A person or institution who manages money or property for another and who must exercise a standard of care in such management activity imposed by law or contract. Eg. Executor of the estate; receiver in bankruptcy….. ‘etc
Black’s 5th Ed P320

Foreign Fiduciary:

‘A trustee, executor, administrator, guardian or conservator appointed by a jurisdiction other than the one in which hi is acting.’
Black’s 5th Ed P321

Sophistry:

'A deliberately invalid argument displaying ingenuity in reasoning in the hope of deceiving someone'

Also have a look at "sophisticate".............(verb) =
1. Make less natural or innocent.
2. Change the meaning of.
3. Alter with the intention to deceive.
4. Make more complex or refined

A.T.O.’S TAX PAYERS’ CHARTER; ‘The federal tax system operates for the benefit of the community and both the Tax Office and taxpayers have an important role to play (what role?). The system is based on taxpayers co-operating with the Tax Office and voluntarily complying with their legal obligations.

Benefit; Advantage; profit; fruit; privilege; gain; interest. The receiving as the exchange for promise some performance or forbearance which promisor was not previously entitled to receive.
Black’s 5th Ed P82

What benefit do tax payers get? Nix!

Community:

Neighbourhood; vicinity; synonymous with Locality. People who reside in a locality in more or less proximity. A society or body of people living in the same place, under the same laws and regulations, who have common rights, privileges, or interests . It connotes a congeries of common interests arising from associations- social, business, religious, governmental, scholastic, recreational
Blacks Law Dictionary 5th ED P146

Taxpayer:

One who pays taxes; person whose income is subject to taxation
Blacks Law Dictionary 5th ED P762

Co-operating:

Cooperation- Action of co-operating. Association of persons for common belief. In patent law, unity of action to a common end or common result, not merely joint or simultaneous action.
Blacks Law Dictionary 5th ED P177

Voluntary:

Unconstrained by interference, unimpelled by another’s influence; spontaneous; acting of oneself. Done by design or intention. Proceeding from the Free and unrestrained will of the person. Produced in or by an act of choice. Resulting from free choice. The word especially in statutes, often implies knowledge of essential faxts. Without valuable consideration; gratuitous, as a voluntary conveyance. Also having a merely nominal consideration; as a voluntary deed.

As to voluntary Answer;

Assignment; bankrupt; confession; conveyance; deposit; escape; indebtedness; manslaughter; Nonsuit; Oath; Payment; Redemption; Sale; Settlement; Trust
Blacks Law Dictionary 5th ED P813

Comply;

To yield; to accommodate, or to adapt oneself to; to act in accordance with; to accept.
Blacks Law Dictionary 5ED P150

Voluntary Complying:

Combine above

Legal:

Conforming to the law;

according to law; required or permitted by law; not forbidden or discounted by law; good and effectual in law.
Blacks Law Dictionary 5th ED P463

Obligation:

A generic word, derived from the latin substantive “obligatio”, having many wide, and varied meanings, according to the context in which it is used. That which a person is bound to do or forebear; any duty imposed by law, promise, contract, relations of society, courtesy, kindness etc. Law or duty binding parties to perform their agreement. An undertaking to perform. That which constitutes a legal or moral duty and which renders a person liable to coercion and punishment for neglecting it; a word of broad meaning, and the particular meaning intended is to be gained by consideration of its context. An obligation or debt may exist by reason of a judgement as well as an express contract, in either case there being a legal duty on the part of the one bound to comply with the promise. The binding power of a Vow, Promise, Oath, or contract, or of law, civil, political, or moral, independent of a promise; that which constitutes legal or moral duty.
Blacks Law Dictionary 5th ED P556

Act:

Denotes external manifestation of actors will. Restatement, Second torts S2. Expression of will or purpose, carries idea of performance; primarily that which is done or doing; exercise of power, or effect of which power exerted is cause; a performance; a deed. In a technical sense, it means something done voluntarily by a person, and of such nature that certain legal consequences attach to it. Thus a grantor acknowledges the conveyance to be his “act or deed”, the terms being synonymous. It may denote something done by an individual, as a private citizen, or as an officer, or by a body of men, as a legislature, a council, or a court of justice; including not merely physical acts, but also decrees, edicts, laws, judgements, resolves, awards, and determinations.
BLACKS LAW DICTIONARY 5TH ED P12

Application:

A putting to, placing before, preferring a request or petition to or before a person. The act of making a request for something. A petition. The use or disposition made of a thing. A bringing together, in order to ascertain some relation or establish some connection; as the application of a rule or principal to a case or fact.
BLACKS LAW DICTIONARY 5TH ED P51

Citizen:

One who, under the constitution and laws of the United States, or of a particular state , is a member of a the political community, owing allegiance and being entitled to the enjoyment of full civil rights. All persons born or Naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof , are citizens of the United States and of the state wherin they reside. U.S.Const., 14th amend.

Members of a political community who, in their associated capacity, have established or submitted themselves to the dominion of a government for the promotion of their general welfare and the protection of their individual as well as collective rights.
BLACKS LAW DICTIONARY 5TH ED P126

Law:

That which is laid down, ordained, or established. A rule or method according to which phenomena or actions co-exist or follow each other. Law, in its generic sense, is a body of rules of action or conduct prescribed by controlling authority, and having binding legal force. That which must be obeyed and followed by citizens subject to sanctions or legal consequences is a law. Law is a solemn expression of the will of the supreme power of the state.
BLACKS LAW DICTIONARY 5TH ED P457

Resident:

Any person who occupies a dwelling within the state, has a present intent to remain within the state for a period of time, and manifests the genuineness of that intent by establishing an ongoing physical presence within the state together with indicia that his presence within the State is something other than merely transitory in nature. The word when used as a noun, means a dweller, habitant or occupant; one who resides or dwells in a place for a period of more, or less, duration; it signifies one having a residence, or one who resides or abides.
BLACKS LAW DICTIONARY 5TH ED P680

Submission:

A yielding to authority; eg a citizen is bound to submit to the laws;
a child to his parents.
A contract between 2 or more parties whereby they agree to refer the subject in Dispute to others and to be bound by their award.
BLACKS LAW DICTIONARY 5TH ED P743

Submit:

To commit to the discretion of another. To yield to the will of another. To propound ; to present for determination; as an advocate submits a proposition for the approval of the Court.
BLACKS LAW DICTIONARY 5TH ED P743

Preamble:

The Clause at the beginning of a constitution or statute explanatory of the reasons for its enactment and the objects sought to be accomplished. Generally, a preamble is a declaration by the legislature of the reasons for the passage of a statute and is helpful in the interpretation in any ambiguities within the statutes to which it is prefixed.
Blacks Law Dictionary 5th Ed P611

Remittance:

Remit: To send or transmit; as to remit money. To send back, as to remit a cheque or refer a case back to a lower court for further consideration. To give up; to pardon or forgive; to annul; to relinquish; as to remit a fine; sentence or punishment.
Blacks 5th Ed P673

Bill:

As a legal term, this word has many meanings and applications, eg. Commercial law. A written statement of the terms of a contract, or specification of the items of a transaction or of a demand. Also, a general name of any item of indebtedness, whether receivable or payable; accounts for goods sold, services rendered, or work done.

As a verb, as generally and customarily used in commercial transactions, ‘bill’ is synonymous with ‘charge’ or ‘invoice’.
Blacks 5th Ed P86

Bill of Sale:

In contracts

Bill of Exchange:

A three party instrument in which first party draws an order for the payment of a sum certain on a second party for payment to a third party at a definite future time. Same as ‘draft’ under U.C.C. A cheque is a demand Bill of Exchange.
Black’s 5th Ed P86

Foreign Bill of Exchange:

A Bill of Exchange drawn in one country upon another country not governed by the same homogenous laws, or not governed throughout by the same municipal laws. A Bill of Exchange drawn in one of the United States upon a person residing in another state is a foreign bill.
Black’s 5th Ed P86

Banker’s Acceptance:

A bill of exchange draft payable at maturity that is drawn by a creditor against his or her debtor. Banker’s acceptances are short term credit instruments most commonly used by persons or firms engaged in international trade.

They are comparable to short term government securities (for example, Treasury Bills) and may be sold on the open market at a discount.

Black’s 5th Ed P76

http://loveforlife.com.au/files/Word%20definitions.doc

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From Here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/5891

PERSON: The Word Person - US Code - The Meanings Of The Word Person:

From the UNITED STATES CODE

The words ‘‘person’’ and ‘‘whoever’’ include corporations, companies, associations, firms, partnerships, societies, and joint stock companies, as well as individuals;

‘‘officer’’ includes any person authorized by law to perform the duties of the office;

‘‘signature’’ or ‘‘subscription’’ includes a mark when the person making the same intended it as such;

---------

(11) The term ‘‘person’’ includes an individual, partnership, committee, association, corporation, labor organization, or any other organization or group of persons, but such term does not include the Federal Government or any authority of the Federal Government.

(13) Organization - The term ‘‘organization’’ means a person or entity other than an individual.

(14) Person or entity - The term ‘‘person or entity’’ means any individual, corporation, company, foundation, association, labor organization, firm, partnership, society, joint stock company, group of
organizations, or State or local government.

If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive or retain any title of nobility or honor, or shall, without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From Here: http://www.loveforlife.com.au/node/5511

Video: Security Of The Person by Robert-Arthur Menard - August 2008 - 1 Hour 36 Minutes
- 1 Hour 36 Minutes

The new work from Freeman-on-the-Land Robert-Arthur Menard.

Robert-Arthur Menard examines the meaning of the term security of the person and how it relates to your relationship with the government. Did you know you owned stock and could hold that stock and collect dividends?

Video: Security Of The Person by Robert-Arthur Menard 96 Minutes

Video: Security Of The Person by Robert-Arthur Menard 96 Minutes

The new work from Freeman-on-the-Land Robert-Arthur Menard.

Robert-Arthur Menard examines the meaning of the term security of the person and how it relates to your relationship with the government. Did you know you owned stock and could hold that stock and collect dividends?

Or Try You-Tube Videos

Part One 10 Minutes 55 Seconds
Part Two 10 Minutes 56 Seconds
Part Three 10 Minutes 7 Seconds
Part Four 10 Minutes 45 Seconds
Part Five 10 Minutes 44 Seconds
Part Six 10 Minutes 45 Seconds
Part Seven 10 Minutes 56 Seconds
Part Eight 6 Minutes 6 Seconds
Part Nine 6 Minutes 1 Second

See Other Robert-Arthur Menard Videos....

Video: Think Free: Bursting Bubbles of Government Deception - Robert-Arthur Menard: http://www.loveforlife.com.au/node/977 -

Video: The Magnificent Deception - Robert-Arthur Menard: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/978

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From Here: http://www.loveforlife.com.au/node/5841

Audio/Video: Red Ice Creations - Natural Man vs. Artificial Person, Law, Money & Banking - Mary Croft Interview

Videos: Natural Man vs. Artificial Person, Law, Money & Banking Part 1 10 Minutes 54 Seconds
Natural Man vs. Artificial Person, Law, Money & Banking Part 2 10 Minutes 52 Seconds
Natural Man vs. Artificial Person, Law, Money & Banking Part 3 10 Minutes 50 Seconds
Natural Man vs. Artificial Person, Law, Money & Banking Part 4 10 Minutes 38 Seconds
Natural Man vs. Artificial Person, Law, Money & Banking Part 5 10 Minutes 38 Seconds
Natural Man vs. Artificial Person, Law, Money & Banking Part 6 3 Minutes 22 Seconds

Red Ice Creations Join up great programs.

Mary Croft's book and links

http://www.freedomfiles.org/mary-book.pdf

http://spiritualeconomicsnow.net

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From Here: http://www.loveforlife.com.au/node/641

Natural Person - The Differences Between Human-Beings, Natural-Persons And Artificial-Persons

Introduction:

You were born a living soul with flesh and blood, with the responsibility to respect other life and treat your fellow man with love and kindness, and with a life-spirit provided by the Creator. Your unalienable rights are for life, liberty and property, and to respect those rights of other human beings on this planet, our home.

In an attempt to create a safe society, men elected Governments to protect and uphold your unalienable rights and your responsibilities to the Creator and your fellow man. After a while, Governments became corrupt and now we have to ask: How could Governments and other "regulatory bodies" possibly make you follow their rules and be subservient to them since your true allegiance is to your Creator? How can you serve two masters - your creator and your Government? The answer is that you cannot server two masters, therefore the Government had to create a system that tricks you into thinking you must serve them, where in fact, Governments must serve us, the people.

One of the ways Governments and other regulators have tricked you into thinking you must follow their rules, is to create for themselves an "artificial-person / corporation" who is not you, but whom the Government has fooled you into thinking is you (See Natural vs. Artificial and Trick #4). But, so as not to violate your fundamental rights, they also have provide recognition in law for another legal entity called a "natural-person" (simply meaning a human-being in the law) with which most of your fundamental rights are still intact. So when you interact with the law, you may be represented as an artificial or natural person - you choose.

This concept of an "artificial-person", a legally obligated entity, that appears to be you, but in fact is not you, is a little difficult to grasp at first, but if you follow through this site, you will understand.

Once the Government creates an "artificial-person" that simulates you (i.e. appears to be the same as you from your point of view), but is actually a contrivance of government laws and regulations -- then they've got you, so to speak. And if you fill out paperwork and sign documents as if you were this artificial-person (create contracts), then they can make you totally subservient to all their rules and regulations:

Make you believe you are obligated to pay taxes,
Make you believe that you have to obtain a driver's licence,
Make you believe that you have to work as an Employee.

This site will explain to you the difference between your human self, man's current representation of the living-soul as you were born to be, your natural-person (the human-being in law), and the legal entity that appears to be you (the corporation / artificial-person). Although all issues discussed here are fully applicable to the laws of Canada, and many of them are also applicable to British Laws and U.S. laws, it is not suggested that all information in this site pertains verbatim to British or U.S. laws.

Another excellent summary of how the "illusion" works, and how to deal with it, is covered in Mary Croft's free book. Her book is recommended reading.

Armed with the information freely available in this site, all British and American visitors are challenged to search their own laws and see how much of the data provided here applies to them in their country -- as well as all other western nations. Only by searching out the truth of the laws and your original rights and freedoms for yourselves, will you be empowered to protect your natural-person.

For the USA, here is an excellent web-site that explains the cover-up of the true tax liability in the USA. Also, here is another web site that discusses Slavery in the USA. Just released is the Google Video of Ed Brown's standoff against the IRS.

The US Federal Income Tax Officially Died on Tuesday March 27, 2007 at 13:53:58 Pacific Daylight Time.

Thought for Canadians: Wouldn't it be a lot easier, for everyone, if the Canadian Government just followed the law instead of trying circumvent the law an an apparent attempt to hide the truth, about certain issues (such as native genocide, war support for weapons of mass destruction, true tax liability, North American Union, worthlessness of paper currency), from the Canadian people? The fastest way to lose the respect of your followers is to lie to them. The same applies with your spouse.

Food for Thought:

"For those with their eyes shut, no explanation will suffice;
For those with their eyes open, no explanation is necessary."
"Whereas it is essential, if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression, that human rights should be protected by the rule of law,"
(Preamble - Universal Declaration of Human Rights)

For more information, go to this website: http://www.natural-person.ca/index.html

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From Here: http://www.loveforlife.com.au/node/1867

Capitis Diminutio Maxima (Name in ALL CAPITALS) - IMPORTANT INFORMATION

The Title or Appellation of a Person.

The sovereign was the natural person with the two names written in upper and lowercase letters, they had to give you the same benefit, or the same privilege or right on the other side in equity. And that person was called a non-resident alien, someone who is not subject to the jurisdiction.

The Second Person

The second person I want to deal with is the person in all capital letters, and that person is called a vessel of the United States. You find that in the United States Government Printing Office Style Manual. You can find that in most law libraries. In section 11.7 it says, "Names of vessels are quoted in matters printed in other than lowercase roman." And it shows a vessel written in all capital letters.

A Vessel

A vessel of the United States has been defined in Title 18, section 9, "Vessels of the United States defined. The term vessel of the United States as used in this title means a vessel belonging in whole or in part to the United States or any citizen thereof or any corporation created by or under the laws of the United States or any State or Territory or district or possession."

It is typically a vessel which is registered, enrolled or licensed. So anyone who is licensed, registered — you have to register your car and register your property — these are all vessels belonging in whole or in part to the United States. And that’s where that comes out of, when they extrapolate it for the admiralty.

So when a person goes down and signs up for social security, they are creating a vessel in all capital letters. When you walk into the social security office, you have to have a birth certificate. Many people are saying the birth certificate is our enemy. In reality, it is our friend.

Foreign Situs Trust

Natural personality, the legal personality of the individual human being, begins upon birth and survival of birth.

When you get your birth certificate that is when the person with the three names comes into existence and that is your remedy in equity. If a person were to put all of his property under the name on the birth certificate, that is written in upper and lowercase letters, that person’s property would be protected — and if he doesn’t use a social security number — will be protected from the government, because that is considered in law as a Foreign Situs Trust.

Under trust there is a place that says "Foreign Situs Trust," and it says "A trust which owes its existence to foreign law. It is treated for tax purposes as a non-resident alien individual. Many of us in this movement have heard of that _expression, but what we didn’t know is that it is a trust, because all of equity is a trust.

You don’t put periods, comas, colons, semi-colons or anything else, because every time you do something like that, it is not the way it is written on the original birth certificate; you change the meaning of it. That’s what they mean by title or appellation

The Next Name

The next name is the name written in upper and lowercase letters with an initial. That person comes into being on the W-4 form. The W-4 form says, "Write your first name, middle initial and last name." trustee that is the who turns over the res to the federal government, because a trust is created whenever property or money or title is transferred, and that’s automatic.

The Corporate Name

There is another name, which is a Corporate Name, but we’re not dealing with corporations. You can have a corporation named after yourself, and that’s a separate entity, too. That is in all Capital Letters. Most corporations are vessels of the United States, and that’s why whenever you see "In Personam," In Personam is Contractual, and the contract that got you into this was the SS-5 SSA application.
An Equitable Estoppel

Unless you change the record, re-vest title it is called because you divested yourself of it, and revoke the fiduciary relationship and the power of attorney, you cannot get remedy, because it is called an

Equitable Estoppel.

An Estoppel is when one is precluded from telling the truth by his prior actions.

Two Types of Birth Certificates

There are two types of birth certificates that are issued. A friend gave me the two birth certificates one is called a Certificate of Live Birth, which has the names written in upper and lowercase letters. There is another one called a Certification of Vital Records, State of Colorado, and that is written in all uppercase letters. So when a baby is born now and it gets a social security number, they very seldom get a Certificate of Live Birth now. They get a Certification of Vital Records, and the person written on it is in all capital letters, and that is considered a vessel of the United States owned in whole or in part by the United States.

That’s the important thing; all these relationships in equity are voluntary.

A Contractual Relationship

The following explains the agency relationship that we have with all these government agencies. It says they are all contractual.

American Jurisprudence 2d, under agency, section one.

The term agency means a fiduciary relationship by which a party confides to another the management of some business to be transacted in the former’s name or on his account, and by which such other assumes to do the business and render an account of it. It has also been defined as a fiduciary relationship which results from the manifestation of consent by one person to another that the other shall act on his behalf and subject to his control and consent by the other so to act. Thus the term agency in its legal sense always imports commercial or contractual dealings between two parties by and through a medium of another.

The "Res"

When you look at the 14th amendment, it talks about a person being born subject to the jurisdiction. When you look up the word "born" you’ll find it talks about delivery. When you look up "delivery," it is when the res is transferred constructively over to another party.

Okay, the "Res" meaning the thing?

The thing itself, or the person, the property, or future rights to property.

When they pass a law, they always must pass a remedy to that law, because this is still a free country.

You have a right to do it or not to do it.

"AmJur"

There used to be patriot mythology which said if you crossed the bar you grant jurisdiction. You granted jurisdiction when you signed up for social security. That’s when you changed your name. Trust law states that whenever title is transferred, a trust is created by operation of law, or whenever money is transferred, it is the operation of law, a trust is automatically created. You find that in AmJur when you look under trusts.

AmJur it explains that it is not a constructive trust. It is an express trust.

A constructive trust is created behind your back. However, you expressly transferred title.
You didn’t know that you were doing that, but under their law, you are presumed to know the law. Under trusts in AmJur you’ll see how that works. When one person delivers money to another for a specific purpose, the transaction becomes a trust. So it is automatic. It also says whenever title is transferred, a trust is automatically created. It’s by operation of law, and it is an express trust because you went in there and asked to have it done.

You walked in with your birth certificate, the one in upper and lowercase letters, and you transferred title, and from then on you were known, not as the three-named person on the birth certificate, you are now known as the person in all capital letters.

This express trust is created through the SS-5 social security application. So now you have asked the government to step in and play a fiduciary responsibility over the property of the trust, the Property of the Trust is You

A Fiduciary Relationship

26 CFR, section 301.7701-6, Definitions, Persons, Fiduciary. Fiduciary distinguished from an agent. There may be a fiduciary relationship between an agent and a principal . . .

The principal is the person who walks in and signs up with the government. The agent or the representative is the IRS, so forth.

But the word agent does not denote a fiduciary. An agent having an entire charge of property with authority to effect and execute leases and tenant. .

The Power Of Attorney!

People need to realize the power of attorney is the 1040 form
. . . entirely on his own responsibility and without consulting the principal, merely turning over the net proceeds from the property periodically to the principal by virtue of the authority conferred upon him by a power of attorney

26 CFR 601.503 "Requirements of a Power of Attorney, Signatures, Fiduciary’s and Commissioner’s authority to substitute other requirements." This describes what a power of attorney has in it. The 1040 fits the description. It has everything the power of attorney must have in it. That’s where we gave them the power of attorney.

"United States" District Courts

Many people go into the United States District Court, and that court is a territorial court. It is not the court of law court.

It is created by virtue of the sovereign congressional faculty granted under Article IV, section 3, of that instrument. Balzac v. Porto Rico, 258 US (Supreme Court).

The proper court to go into is the "district court of the United States," small "d," small "c," and that’s the law side of the court. However, to get into that court your status must be correct.

In "Equity"

When you are in equity, you have to do it according to their rules, because in equity they create the rules. A lot of things we are doing are under law and not under equity, so we have to know how to do them under equity, based on their rules. Because we "Volunteered" in, we have to go by their rules.
The Power to Re-Vest Title

26 CFR 1.676A-1, Power to re-vest title to portions of the trust property in grantor; general rule. If a power to re-vest in the grantor title to any portion of a trust is exercisable by the grantor or non-adverse party or both, without the approval or consent of an adverse party . . .

That’s the government. So you have the power to revoke the power of attorney and re-vest and to terminate. You must do this on a government form, and you must know how to do it.

The Grantor Type Trusts

Because the birth certificate is an irrevocable trust that is set up, and that is one of the secrets. It is an irrevocable trust and you cannot change the name on that unless you go to court. You cannot change it any way, shape or form because you did not create that trust. The grantor type trusts that are created under Social Security, you can change at any time, and you can revoke at any time because you created that trust, but your property is brought down through generations, in equity, because that’s what a trust is, and equity has existed for hundreds of years under the law of use from England. So this is what happens, you have an irre the person who is neither a citizen nor resident of the United States, sui juris, is the Christian appellation or the legal name. Legal as opposed to equity.

A Vocable Trust

Vocable trust that is on the birth certificate which you cannot change.

Legal name. Under common law, consists of one Christian name and one surname, and the insertion, omission, or mistake in middle name or initial is immaterial. The legal name of an individual consists of a given or baptismal name usually assumed at birth and a surname deriving from the common name of the parents

Christian name is necessary in any process reverting one back to one’s natural self.

"Sui Juris"

. He is sui juris, and we all agree on that. The common law person is sui juris, outside of equity, so he is the only one that can do this procedure. Another thing is the Address must be written in a Foreign Address because it is the law of Domicile which determines what laws are going to be applicable
When you look up "born," it gives you the word "deliver." When you look up "delivery," it is when the res of your trust, the birth certificate (written in upper and lowercase letters, not the one that is now in capital letters on the bank paper), is transferred constructively to the Federal government. Under Am Jur, under "trust," it says that whenever title is transferred, or property is transferred, a trust is automatically created by operation of law, regardless of the intent of the parties. So, when you walked in with your birth certificate in upper and lowercase letters and you transferred title, you created this new entity in all capital letters

The Straw-Man

Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Ed., on page 1142, definitions of persons. To understand this even further, Black’s Law Dictionary uses the word "entity." When you look up "entity," it is defined on page 532 as "a real being, existence, an organization or being that possesses separate existence for tax purposes." So they got you to create this separate being, this so-called straw man, person, entity, corporation, trust, partnership, whatever, so they could tax that. That’s the entity they are taxing because they have no legal authority to tax the individual. The 16th Amendment gave them no new authority to tax anybody.

So the law says you have the power to change this situation and to revoke that situation at any time.

The Different Kinds of Law

Volume IV, Business Law, by Nathan Isaac. It talks about the different kinds of law that must be dealt with: Contract, agency, corporation, trusteeship, and one they don’t mention here is admiralty, which is insurance. That’s where the Social Security comes in that puts us I but it says you can cancel the admiralty contract. There is an agency relationship. can If you look up "agency" in Black’s you’ll find that you hired the IRS to handle this account for you, and it is a power of attorney. If you don’t revoke the power of attorney, then the attorney come around your back and undo everything you’ve done.
An attorney said. This is out of the Rocky Mountain News, November 13, 1995, in Colorado. He says, "The power of attorney should not be given to another person lightly. It depends on the scope of the document. ... If it is financial [the power of attorney], it can give the agent [the person who gets the power of attorney] the ability to rob you blind." And that’s what these guys are doing to us, they are robbing us blind.

It also says here that you have to revoke that power of attorney. Am.Jur. under agency says you have to revoke the instrument. Many patriots seem to be under the impression that you revoke the signature, but that is not correct. You revoke the instrument.

Look in Am. Jur. Encyclopedia of the Law under "agency" and it will tell you how that agency relation works and how that agent can undo everything you have done, if you do not revoke it.

Give you an example, under UCC you will not find murder. The UCC only covers two things, orders to pay and promises to pay. Murder doesn’t come under that. It has been said that commerce is defined in Title 27, and all crimes are commercial. That may be, but they are commercial because they are admiralty. What puts you in admiralty is the insurance program of social security. Insurance is under admiralty law. That’s what gets us into commercial activity with the government, across state lines. You’ll find all those crimes listed in Title 27 U.S.C. section 72.11 in Benedict on Admiralty 7th Edition Revised, Jurisdiction and Principles, 1988 Supplement. It lists all the crimes in Title 27 as under admiralty law because there are no common law crimes in the federal jurisdiction, so they all must be commercial

The Vessel

That’s why they 20 CFR 404.1004, part 3, American vessel means a vessel documented or numbered under the laws of the United States.

So that’s what vessels is, and remember, the vessel is the straw man. You’ll see that in the Government Style Manual are commercial crimes, and what puts you in that jurisdiction is the contract

Title 26 is the Trust Fund, and it is the Puerto Rican Trust. Trust 62

Statutes at Large, Volume 48, 73rd Congress, Session 2, Chapter 756, June 26, 1934. Under that section you’ll find that the trust is called #62 Puerto Rico Special Fund Internal Revenue. So Title 26 contains the laws of the trust. In fact, all the titles are the laws of the trust. And it says in here:

The funds appearing on the books of the government and listed in subsection (b) and (c) of this section, shall be classified on the books of the Treasury as trust funds. All monies accruing to these funds are hereby appropriated and shall be disbursed in compliance with the terms of the trust. Hereafter, monies received by the government as trustee analogous to these funds named in section

(b) and (c) of this section and not otherwise herein provided for . . .

The Puerto Rican Trust

It gives the names of quite a few of the trusts, and #62 is the Puerto Rican Trust.

Another section people want to look at is Title 31 Money and Finance, sub-chapter 2, Administrative, section 321, General Authority of the Secretary, and #2 under that says:

For the purposes of the federal income, estate, and gift taxes, property accepted under paragraph 1 shall be considered as a gift or bequest to or for the use of the United States.

So all the monies that are given to the United States are from the trust and they are gifts, because the trust that is created on the social security is a charitable trust, and the government is not taxing the individual, they are taxing the trust, because the flesh and blood person they cannot tax without apportionment. So they are obeying the law, the thing is, we don’t know what the law says.

The 14th amendment doesn’t really talk about two citizenships. It creates a new one, which is a federal citizen. Those citizens are from Guam, Puerto Rico, American Samoa and the Virgin Islands. Supra.

Was set up in Puerto Rico, so when you state you are a United States citizen, you are a citizen of Puerto Rico. That’s where you immigrated. An American National doesn’t have to be naturalized. The 14th amendment talks about being naturalized, well what you missed is, "all persons born." When were you born? Look up the word "born" in a law dictionary. It mentions the word "delivery." "Delivery" is when the property or the res was transferred, and that’s when you transferred your name or title from the person on the birth certificate, written in upper and lowercase letters.

The Alien Individual Trust

When they transferred over to equity, they had to give you something equivalent to a sovereign individual, and that equivalent is called the non-resident alien individual, which is a trust.

. You find that in Black’s when you look under "trusts," it says foreign situs trust and it says it is a trust which owes its existence to foreign law. It is treated for tax purposes as a non-resident alien individual

. But a nonresident alien working for a corporation can be taxed. However, that is because he is within their jurisdiction, and he is working for a corporation. However, you can get an exemption, and there is a form for that. There is a form for a person who works for a corporation, and there is one for the independent contractor. That’s the term for the freeman in equity, but he must have an exemption.

A Violation of Fiduciary Duty

They now call a freeman a nonresident alien individual?

There are no debtors in prison — the law says there are no debtor’s prisons in America. However, there are prisons for violation of fiduciary duty

So that is what people are being thrown in jail for, a violation of fiduciary duty, because they created this trust, made the government partial beneficiary of the trust, and they hired the IRS to handle that account and to effectuate their conduct and the conduct of third parties, the employer or whoever else you do business with. And that’s why you don’t get any remedy. And that’s why people end up in jail -- violation of fiduciary duty. They do not tolerate that, at all.

Trust Fund Taxes or Employment Taxes

What people need to know, the tax in question that is being collected is not an income tax, it is called trust fund taxes or employment taxes. That is the tax that is being collected, trust fund taxes, and they are called employment taxes.

You’ll find the thing on employment taxes in Title 26 Internal Revenue section 3401 and it says "Employment taxes. The term employment tax means any tax imposed by Subtitle C of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986." You’ll find that codified in 26 CFR 801.401 Employment Taxes, and it says, "Federal employment taxes are imposed by Subtitle C of the Internal Revenue Code." When you look under Subtitle C, you’ll find that the tax is voluntary, and that’s called a voluntary withholding agreement. That’s in 26 CFR 31.3402P-1, voluntary withholding agreement

Taxing the Fictitious Entity

The trustee is the one who pays the taxes. What is being taxed is the trust. The tax is attributed to the trust that you set up. That’s what is being taxed because they have no lawful authority to tax the individual, the natural person. When you look under "persons" in Black’s Law Dictionary, it talks about entity. When you look up "entity" in Black’s, it says, "A real being, existence, an organization or being that possess separate existence for tax purposes." So they created another entity, called a trust, in order to tax, because they knew they couldn’t tax the natural, common law individual. The live individual they cannot tax. They are taxing the fictitious entity.

So they got you to create this separate being, this so-called straw man, person, entity, corporation, trust, partnership, whatever, so they could tax that. That’s the entity they are taxing because they have no legal authority to tax the individual

Status of vessels of the United States. Vessels documented under the laws of the United States are entitled to privileges and subject to the obligations described by the laws of the Untied States for merchant vessels.

So here it says it is the documentation that gets you in trouble.

Section 81.4 under Regulations, Appendix B-13, Status of American undocumented vessels. American undocumented vessels are not under the jurisdiction of the United States and consequently are not subject to the obligations nor entitled to protections.

Admiralty Law Extrapolated On Land

Here it is saying it is the documentation that gets you in trouble. Then if you want to find out what the number does you go to section 783.41, which talks about the number of the vessels, and it says you are required to have a number if you are going to operate in admiralty waters, which is on their highways and their business and contracts — that it’s not the number which gets you in trouble, it is the documentation.

The government has a form to cancel the documentation or the SS-5 application. So I’ve proved my point right there. They think it is very important to cancel the application. It says nothing about the number. When you apply for Social Security, it doe So unless you get rid of the documentation, and there is a form to do that, however, it must be done in the correct way, then you are subject to the obligations, if you don’t get rid of that documentation. And if anyone wants to see what the documentation is, they even define what documentation is, and here it is. You’ll find it in the same thing, Benedict on Admiralty, section 783.41, "Numbered vessels." And in it, it says it is not the number that does you in; you need a number to operate in admiralty. They say it right there. And remember, they took the admiralty law extrapolated on land.sn’t say on the SS-5 that you are applying for a number, it says you are applying for a card, or the documentation.

So the straw man, I want to make this clear, is a person, corporation, trust, and all those things which are considered vessels or entities, real beings possessing separate existence for tax purposes. And you create that entity when you sign up for Social Security. That’s when you created the straw man. You created it, they didn’t, and the law says you created this when you walked in and you transferred title.

Another thing about the document of title, I believe there are two birth certificates. There is the one they give now, which is on the bank note paper. I believe that one you actually transfer title. The previous ones written in upper and lowercase letters, and certificates of live are birth, versus those new ones you get now, which are documents of title that you still hold, but what it says is you transferred it constructively. When you look up "delivery," it says it is not actual transfer; it is constructive delivery of the trust. It is constructive, not actual, so you still have title. I already read that the law says you are treated as the owner, even though you are not treated as the owner underneath their law. And at all times you have the power to revoke. Oddly enough, there is a law that says you can revoke this fiduciary relationship of principle and agent that you got yourself into.

Code of Federal Regulations 26 CFR 301.6903-1 Notice of Fiduciary Relationship. When the fiduciary capacity has terminated, the fiduciary, in order to be relieved of any further duty or liability as such, must file with the District Director...

The District Director is the District Director of the IRS in your region or area, and it is not the Secretary of State

Eric Wesley Lynch P.O. Box 1405 Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80034-1405 (303) 432-8037
George Paffenbarger, III

Link to this article: http://pacificguardian.info/files/Appellation%20of%20a%20person.pdf

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From here: http://www.loveforlife.com.au/node/6419

PERSON
By The Informer

This article is being presented, by The Informer, to all people who call themselves "persons" when in a legal setting. The word "person" is not, in legal terms or political terms, what one wants to be. Also, as you will see the term "people" in political terminology is very bad for one who loves freedom. Such as in the phrase "We the People." This will quell and settle, once and for all, all the arguments that are flying around about the term citizen and person, that never is settled. This will also upset people that use the term Pro Se or Propria Persona. I have rung the bell many times since 1990 and still people persist, to their own detriment, to use these terms and tacitly admit they are a "person." This will undoubtedly set some guru’s back a piece that preach citizenship of a state is what you want to be. It will also set back some guru’s who preach 14thamendment, and that blacks were not persons until the 14th Amendment was conceived. The History here will show why their arguments are flawed. Of course this will inflame those guru’s to know end. But this is not directed to them but to all you "MEN" and "WOMAN" out there that don’t know what to call your selves when addressing any government in a political and legal position. I just gave you the terms to use as you are a physical man or woman reading this, are you not? The artificial you, with a name spelled in all Capital letters, cannot read but has to have a representative. That representative is you, the real live natural MAN or WOMAN and not a "PERSON," is that not correct? Don’t know how to answer this, do you? Well don’t be dismayed for you will after reading this. The truth is here for all to see. I suspect that Men and Women are so brainwashed by the spin doctors, and guru’s that have never studied this, will have a hard time believing this. This comes from a Law book used to teach in Law Schools across the Country. But you will not find it being taught in this modern era, because to do so would put a very bad crimp in government's control over the masses of people calling themselves "persons."

Do not think that after reading this you can go into any court and they will say, my gosh you are right we have no control over you. Just the opposite will be true and they can ask at least three questions that will stop you cold in your tracks and they will walk all over you like flies on a cow patty, because you will stammer and not be able to answer them. At that point they will know that you don't know the correct argument and you lose and BAD CASE LAW will be set. The next MAN that come in with a correct understanding will lose right off the bat because of the bad case law that you have set. I have seen this hundreds of times in the patriot community when someone with a little knowledge is very dangerous to other freedom loving MEN when jumping into water they think is two feet deep only to find it 1000 feet deep and no way to get out.
The material below comes from a 13 volume set of Law books.

This is from Vol. XIII AMERICAN LAW AND PROCEDURE. JURISPRUDENCE AND LEGAL INSTITUTIONS. By James De Witt Andrews LL.B. (Albany Law School), LL.D. (Ruskin University) from La Salle University. I have bolded the footnotes as they may be mixed within some paragraphs, to separate them from the main text so it is not confusing. Starting at the end of section 63;

"Jeremy Bentham, in his remarks in reference to the inexact use of language by Blackstone in pages 47 and 49 of the Commentaries, says: "When leading terms are made to chop and change their several significations, sometimes meaning one thing, sometimes another, at the upshot perhaps nothing, and this in the compass of a paragraph, one may judge what will be the complexion of the whole context" (31).

64. The legal conception of leading words. Inasmuch as the word person, man, thing, property, rights, wrongs and actions are leading terms constituting the designation of departments of the corpus juris, it will be impossible to obtain clear conceptions of subjects connected with these words until an understanding is agreed upon as to the sense in which these terms are used. If we arrive at the meaning of these words intended by Blackstone and make the same clear, we will have a better idea of his method and perhaps a better opinion of it, and at the same time will be able to show the distinction between the same words in the Roman, the English and in American law.

Blackstone apparently uses the Roman word persona as synonymous with the English word "person," and the latter word interchangeably with "individual" and "man," whereas he might have avoided all confusion by a closer adherence to that which he professed to follow.

65. The word "person" defined. Gaius says "De Juris divisione" [the divisions of the law] immediately preceding his division of the law; then follows, "De conditione hominm" [meaning the condition or status of men]. In the Institutes "De jura personarum" precedes the expression "all our law relates either to persons, or to things, or to actions,... The words persona and personae did not have the meaning in the Roman which attaches to homo, the individual, or a man in the English; it had peculiar reference to artificial beings and the condition or status of individuals.(33)

33. Professor John Austin’s view.—"Many of the modern civilians have narrowed the Import of the term ‘person’ as meaning a physical or natural person. They define a person thus: ‘homo, cure statu sue censlderatus;, a qauman being, invested with the condition of status., And, In this definition, they use the term status in a restricted sense, as including only those conditions which comprise rights and as excluding conditions which are purely onerous and burthensome, or which consist of duties merely. According to this definition, human beings who have no rights are not persons, but things, being classed with other things which have no rights residing in themselves, but are merely the subjects of rights residing in others. Such, in the Roman law, down to the age of the Antonlnes, was the position of the slave." Austin’s Jur., vol 1, 358.

The signification in Our Jurisprudence .... The word ‘Person,’ in its primitive and natural sense, signifies the mask with which actors, who played dramatic pieces in Rome and Greece, covered their heads. These pieces were played in public places. and afterwards in Such vast amphitheaters that it was impossible for a man to make himself heard by all the spectators. Recourse was had to art; the head of each actor was enveloped with a mask, the figure of which represented the Part he was to play, and it was so contrived that the opening for the emission of his voice made the sounds clearer and more resounding, vox personabat, when the name persona was given to the instrument or mask which facilitated the resounding of his voice. The name persona was afterwards applied to the part itself which the actor had undertaken to play, because the face of the mask was adapted to the age and character of him who was considered as speaking, and sometimes it was his own portrait. It is in this last sense of personage, or of the part which an individual plays, that the word persona is employed in jurisprudence, in opposition to the word man, homo. When we speak of a person, we only consider the state of the man, the part he plays in society, abstractly, without considering the individual".

1 Bouvier’s Institutes, note 1.

Austin’s Jur., 362.
See 4 Harv. Law Rev., 101,
Austin’s Jur., 363.

The word "homo" corresponds to the English word "man," and, as the Romans expressed it, "unus homo sustinet plures personas;" i.e., one man has many persons, or sustains many status, or many different conditions (34) AUSTINS JUR., 362)

Austin says: "The term ‘person’ has two meanings, which must be carefully distinguished. It denotes a man or human being; or it signifies some condition borne by a man (35 See Harvard Law Revues 101). A person (as meaning a man) is one or individual, but a single or individual person (meaning a man) may sustain a number of persons (meaning condition or status)" (36 Austins Jur., 363).

Notice that this meaning is not so broad as that given by Ortolan. It does not include artificial persons. Again, he says: "As throwing light on the celebrated distinction between jus rerum and jus personarum, phrases which have been translated so absurdly by Blackstone and others,--rights of persons and rights of things, jus personarum did not mean law of persons, or rights of persons, but law of status, or condition. A person is here not a physical or individual person, but the status or condition with which he is invested. It is a remarkable confirmation of this that Gauis, in the margin purporting to give the title or heading of this part of the law, has entitled it thus: De conditione hominum; and Theophilus, in translating the Institutes of Justinian from Latin into Greek, has translated jus personarum . . . diviso personarum; understanding evidently by persona . . . not an individual or physical person, but the status, condition or character borne by physical persons. This distinctly shows the meaning of the phrase jus per sonarurn, which has been involved in impenetrable obscurity by Blackstone and Hale. The law of persons is the law of status or condition; the law of things is the law of rights and obligations considered in a general manner, or as distinguished from these peculiar collections of rights and obligations which are styled conditions and considered apart.

A moment’s reflection enables one to see that man and person cannot be synonymous, for there cannot be an artificial man, though there are artificial persons. Thus the conclusion is easily reached that the law itself often creates an entity or a being which is called a person; the law cannot create an artificial man, but it can and frequently does invest him with artificial attributes; this is personality, which we see and by which we are affected.

The law does not distinguish between men except by their personality, as king or magistrate, or as parent or husband or wife, etc. While the idea may be difficult for the tyro to grasp, the personality, i.e., this condition or status of a many is entirely the creation of the law. By nature all men are created free and equal, i.e., of equal rank, equal rights; but the law does not look upon all men as equal, though in the law of the United States all men have equal civil rights (39).

The question is asked, Who is that man? The reply would be, that is the king or lord so and so, or the chief justice or the president or governor. But what is the name of this personage? The name indicates the man, the title, rank or legal standing of the person.

The word "persons" denoted certain conditions of rank or status with which a man was clothed by law. To adopt the language of the same author, "the term ‘person,’ as denoting a condition or status, is therefore equivalent to character (40). It signified, originally, a mask worn by a player, and distinguished the character which he represented from the other characters in the play. From the mask which expressed the character, it was extended to the character itself. From characters represented by players, or from dramatic characters, it Was further extended by a metaphor to conditions or as status. For men, as subjects of law, are distinguished conditions, just as players, perform by their respective conditions, just as players, performing a play are distinguished by the several persons which they respectively enact or sustain" (41). As we shall see, the word had a still broader meaning.

"A slave," says Holland, "having, as such, neither rights or liabilities, had in Roman law, strictly speaking, no ‘status,’ ‘caput,’ or ‘persona.’ On the day of his manumission, says Modesfinus, ‘incipit stature habere.’ Before manumission, as we read in the Institutes, ‘nullurn caput habuit’" (42).

The following is the explanation given by Mr. Sandars in Ms translation of the Institutes: "The word persona had, in the usage of the Roman law, a different meaning from that which we ordinarily attach to the word ‘person.’ Whoever or whatever was capable of having, and being subject to, rights, was a persona. All men possessing a reasonable will would naturally be personae; but not all those who were, physically speaking, men, were personae. Slaves, for instance, were not in a position to exercise their reason and will, and the law, therefore refused to treat them as personae."

"On the other hand, many personae had no physical existence. The law clothed certain abstract conceptions with an existence, and attached to them the capability of having and being subject to rights. The law, for instance, spoke of the state as a persona· It was treated as being capable of having the rights and of being

[39 See Ex parte Virginia, 100 U.S. 368. 40 Hale nowhere speaks of status, but uses the term "character" or "capacity." See note 60. below.]

subject to them. These rights really belonged to the men who composed the state, and they flowed from the constitution and position of associated individuals. But, in the theory and language of law, the rights of the whole community were referred to the state, to an abstract conception interposed between these rights and the individual members of society. So, a corporation, or an ecclesiastical institution, was a persona, quite apart from the individual personae who formed the one and administered the other. Even the riscus, or the imperial treasury, as being the symbol of the abstract conception of the emperor's claims, was spoken of as a persona. The technical term for the position of an individual regarded as a legal person was status" (44).

Ortolan’s explanation of personality.(45) The substance of the above was undoubtedly taken from Ortolan’s treatment of the subject as given in his History of the Roman Law, which is submitted because it is clear and concise:

"The word ‘person’ (persona) does not in the language of the law, as in ordinary language, designate the physical man. This word in law has two acceptations: In the first, it is every being considered as capable of having or owing rights, of being the active or passive subjects of rights.

"We say every being, for men are not alone comprised therein. In fact, law by its power of abstraction creates persons, as we shall see that it creates things, which do not exist in nature.

Thus, it erects into persons the state, cities, communities, charitable or other institutions, even purely material objects, such as the fiscus, or inheritance in abeyance, because it makes of them beings capable of having or owing rights. In the inverse sense, every man in Roman law is not a person. For example, slaves were considered as the property of the master, especially under the rigorous system of primitive legislation, because they are the object and not the subject of law. This, however, did not prevent the Romans from including them in another sense in the class of persons.

"We shall therefore have to discriminate between and to study two classes of person: physical or natural persons, for which we find no distinctive denomination in Roman jurisprudence except the expressions taken from Ulpian, singularis persona; that is to say, (46) the man-person; and abstract persons, which are fictitious and which have no existence except in law; that is to say, those which are purely legal conceptions or creations.

"In another sense, very frequently employed, the word ‘person’ designates each character man is called upon to play on the judicial stage; that is to say, each quality which gives him certain rights or certain obligations-for instance, the person of 43 Slaves were not persons in the United States until after the abolition of slavery

1 Hammond’s B]k. 334, note.
44 Sandars’ Justinian, Introduction, P. 26.
45 Ortolan’s History of the Roman Law is among the best. It is, unfortunately, not easily obtained.

father; of son as subject to his father; of husband or guardian. In this sense the same man can have several personae at the same time. The last two paragraphs embrace all that Austin gives us in the quotation given above.

From what we have seen, the following conclusion may be drawn: The words persona and status were not synonymous, though very nearly so. The word "person" had two meanings:

First. Every being, artificial or natural, capable of having or owing rights.

Second. The characters, capacities, qualities or positions which the law ascribed to certain men as individuals—that is, rank, condition, capacity-status.

The technical term for the second meaning, namely, the position, quality, character which a man bears, is status.

Status is not so broad as person, but always related to physical men.

A slave had no rights, no rank, no standing, no capacity, and consequently no status. This applies, of course, only to the earlier days of Roman law, for subsequently slaves were given a standing as men.

" In the earlier days of Roman law," says Sandara "no one would have conceived this to be unnatural" (48).

In the days of Gaius, it seems, slaves are treated as persons, for he says: "Persons are freemen or slaves" (49).

In England all men were persons, and were divided into certain classes or ranks by virtue of which they had especial characters, capacities, rights, privileges and immunities; for instance, the right of magistracy’ as king, as lord, etc. These were artificial. In human societies men have certain standing, position, capacity, according as they are sovereign or subjects, parents and children, husband and wife, or citizens.

We have seen something of the etymology of the word, also its meaning and application as used in the :Roman law. We know that the word "person" is a familiar one in English literature, both in England and America. We are endeavoring to ascertain whether in the English language we have a right to oppose persons to things for the Purpose of classification of rules of law, and if thereby we convey intelligent ideas.

We know that all laws emanate from persons and also that they operate against or upon persons(50); that is, all law certainly from laws, and that the principle of classification adopted is the difference in the objects to which the rules relate.

There can be found in the Commentaries of Blackstone no definition of the word person, nor any explanation of the meaning

[46 Does not this equal "individuals?" See 10 Harvard Law Rev., 101.
47 Ortholan’s History of Roman Law, 567-68.
48 Sandals’ Justinian, Int., 27; Austin’s Jur., lect. 12, P.358 49 Galus, 1-9; Austin’s Jur., 358.]

addresses persons. So of rights. We know that rights belong to persons, and that in that sense there cannot be the rights of things. It should be borne in mind that we are endeavoring to classify the body of laws, and not the rights which are resultant intended to be ascribed to the word "person,"and the word is there used indiscriminately in the popular and legal sense, interchangeably with "man" and "individual," and also to designate artificial beings capable of having rights; and there is not the slightest hint that in using the Roman expressions there is any change intended from the Roman idea of the word "person," though he does treat under the rights of persons what he styles absolute rights, which would be called "things" in Roman law.

§ 66. Scope of the word "thing." Of things (51), which is the subject of the second book, Blackstone says: "The objects of your inquiry in this second book will be the jura rerum, or those rights which a man may acquire in and to such external things as are unconnected with his person." Why not say unconnected with him, himself? These are what the writers in natural law style the "rights of dominion or property." This is the only definition given of the words "property" ‘or "thing;" that is, the jura rernm equals those rights which a man may acquire in and to external thlngs. Otherwise put, the rights of things are rights which a man may acquire in and to things unconnected with his person; and these are what writers in natural law style property; yet in the treatment of this subject the learned commentator treats the subject of contracts, the main feature of which is its obligation, or, in other words, the power which the law affords one person of enforcing it by . . . ..

WE now go further into the book and this is what it has to say about you people who want so much to be a part of the body politic and want the Constitution as your God and then claim that you are free from the tether of government. IT AIN"T GONNA HAPPEN AND YOU HAVE BEEN SUCKERED IN HOOK, LINE AND SINKER WHEN CLAIMING SO AND ARE COMPLETELY DOMINATED BY THEM.

50. Virginia v. Rives, 100 U.S. 332; 92’ ld. 554; United States v. Harris, 106 id. 629; Civil Rights Cases, 109 id. 3. A state may in a sense fall under the designation, and laws be directed against states; but as the state acts by individuals, in the same manner it is operated upon through individuals.

51. Observe the word "chose," which will be explained hereafter. Its meaning has an important bearing on the modified meaning of both "person" and "things." Vol. XII 12

CHAPTER VIII

THE PEOPLE.

§ 104. The people: Identity. In the United States the people are brought on the stage as an acting political entity, acting, it is true, always through representatives. As expressed by Wilson, one of the signers of the Declaration of Independence: "In free states the people form an artificial person or body politic, the highest and noblest that can be known" (1 Wilson’s Works).

By "the people" of a state is meant all of the (members) which compose that state and are integral parts of it, together making a body politic (2 Penhollowv Doane, 3 Dall. 55, 93).

[PEOPLE, THIS IS A STRAIGHT OUT ADMIRALTY CASE IN CASE YOU DIDN'T KNOW AS IT DEALT WITH LAW MERCHANTS, YOU KNOW THEM AS CORPORATE ENTITIES]

The people as a corporate unit form an artificial person or body politic; thus constituted they form a moral person". "It is this person we call a state. (4 1 Wilson’s Works 321-325: 2 Wilson’s Works 321)" "There is no distinction between the people and the state" (5 Penhollow v Doane, 3 Dall 93).

It must not be forgotten that, in using the expression "the people," there is a distinction between the population of the nation, as individuals, and the same population organized under a constitution. By "the people," in this connection, we intend a body politic, a corporate unity. Because of the quality of singleness we may properly use the pronoun "it," though, this is not usual. It is hard for the citizen to lose sight of the individuals in the body; but correctly viewed, as drops of water lose their forms as drops when they mingle with the whole and become not drops, but one body, even so the citizen in his political capacity loses the civil capacity of an individual when viewed as a part of that great unit "the people."

It is the whole mass, and not a majority of the individuals composing it, which constitutes the people, and the people are to be regarded, not as an unorganized mob, but as a corporate unity composing a society (6). There are dicta to the effect that the people, when spoken of in the political sense, means only those persons having the right to vote, that is, the electors; and it is at the same time said that in the electors is vested the sovereignty (7). Thus stated, the idea does not, as we shall see, properly obtain, and is contrary to the principles of American institutions (8). Voters are but parts of the machinery of government (9). In the constitution "the people, is sometimes used to indicate persons or individuals. So in all provisions in reference to unreasonable seizures and searches. In such provision it is identical with the use in Blackstone.

6. Jameson, Const. Con. (4th ed.), pp. q8, 19, notes: Von Holst’s Con.
Law, 48, 49; Penhallow v. Doane, 3 Dall. 92.

"A distinction was taken at the bar between a state and the people of the state. It is a distinction I am not capable of comprehending. By a state forming a republic (speaking of it as a moral person), I do not mean the legislature of the state, the executive of the state, or the judiciary, but all the citizens who compose the state, and are, if I may so express myself, integral parts of it; all together forming a body politic. The great distinction between monarchies and republics (at least our republic) in general is, that in the former the monarch is considered as the sovereign, and each individual of his nation as a subject to him, though in some countries with many important special limitations. This, I say, is generally the ease, for it has not been so universally. But in a republic, all the citizens as such, are equal, and no citizen can rightfully exercise any authority over another but in virtue of a power constitutionally given by the whole community, and such authority, when exercised, is In effect an act of the whole community, which forms such body politic. In such governments, therefore, the sovereignty resides in the great body of the people, but it resides in them not as so many distinct individuals, but in their political capacity only. Thus A., B., C., and D. are citizens of Pennsylvania, and as such, together with all the citizens of Pennsylvania, share in the sovereignty of the state. Suppose a state to consist exactly of the number of 100,000 citizens, and it were practicable for them all to assemble at one time and in one place, and that 99,999 did actually assemble. The state would not be in fact assembled. Why? Because the state in fact is composed of all the citizens, not of a part only, however large the part may be, and one is wanting." Penhallow v. Doane, 3 Dall. 93.

7. Cooley’s Const. Lira. 40, citing Blair v. Rldgely, 41 Mo. 63; 97 Am:Dec. 248
.8. Wilson’s Works, App’x A, IX 566; McOrary on Elections (4th ed.), sec 13.
9. State v. Cunningham, 81 Wis. 498.

§105. Capacity. Power. Sovereignty. We may now examine the powers of the people, and in the course of this examination but little time need be spent upon theory or metaphysical discussion of what ought to be the law governing the matter, but will, as far as possible, be conferred to the practical, visible facts.

The discussion of the capacities of that person we term "the people" necessarily involves the discussion of What is termed sovereignty. Let no one suppose that this question is an impracticable one and that it has no further.

I END THIS SECTION HERE --GO TO THE NEXT SECTION 132 AND-- STARTING AT THE END OF THE PAGE WHICH CONTAINS WHAT I WANT YOU TO SEE.

"To fully appreciate the idea of sovereignty and the federal court has appellate jurisdiction of a suit by a state against an individual (13). The palpable injustice of the rule has led to several ingenious devices to avoid its application (14), such for example as the assignment of the cause of action to a person competent to sue, (e.g. a state), which, however, must be a real assignment (15).

The sufficient reason for the rule is found in the expression, "it is the written law"; the motive for it throws no light on its application (16).

§ 133. An individual contracts with a state at his peril.

It is now well settled that there is no judicial remedy in favor of an individual against a state to compel the performance of a contract (17), though it is settled that a state can pass no law impairing the obligation of a contract once made (18). The only security for state loans rests on the plighted faith of the state as a political community; that is, upon the same basis as contracts with independent governments (19). States are not, like nations, independent of each other, and are not permitted to allow the use of state names for the purpose of enforcing claims really owned by individuals.

As to torts and injuries: It is no answer to a tort or an active infringement of a right or a threatened injury that the action was taken or is proceeding under supposed official duty or by virtue of official power: such cases are not damnum absque injuria.

There you have it people. I did not highlight anything in the main text that was not already there or italicized. This is devastating against the Government of State and Federal. Do you want to find out how corrupt "your" government is? Well after this hits the net the Government will pull from the shelves of all the libraries and law schools where some of these volumes might be, just as Hitler did to the German people so they would not learn the truth. What makes you think this country’s slime balls, called government officials and the lawyers that run this country,--count the number of executive and legislative persons there are that are lawyers,-- are any different? They are not. In those countries it was brutality, here it is legality with words, but the results are the same, -- complete control of the Men and Women. But of late it has become apparent that brutality is showing its ugly head starting with IRS, ATF and DEA abuse of the people under the directives of upper level "persons" that legally can’t throw enough men and women in jail fast enough.

I’ll tell you that the law professors know this and they taught it. They can’t teach it now , by government dictate. Lawyers are only taught what the establishment wants taught. The legal profession has so much moral turpitude oozing from their pores that compared to a chicken house that hasn't been cleaned in a month, on a 100 degree day, make it smell like a bed of roses.

As Shakespeare said very eloquently, "The first thing we do is hang all the lawyers." Yes, and Virginia Colony was correct back in the 1700’s that the practice of lawyering was an offense punishable by death. They sure dropped the ball on that one.

So the problem at hand is that every statute is written with the term "person" in mind. Why, you ask? Well as I quoted in my book "The New History of America," the case of Cruden v Neale, where the court states a principle of natural law so clear that it cannot be twisted by any lawyer, that man is only bound by the laws of nature. Here is what the court stated;

" When a change of government takes place, from a monarchial to a republican government, the old form is dissolved. Those who lived under it, and did not choose to become members of the new, had a right to refuse their allegiance to it, and to retire elsewhere. By being a part of the society subject to the old government, they had not entered into any engagement to become subject to any new form the majority might think proper to adopt. That the majority shall prevail is a rule posterior to the formation of government, and results from it. It is not a rule binding upon mankind in their natural state. There, every man is independent of all laws, except those prescribed by nature. He is not bound by any institutions formed by his fellowmen without his consent." CRUDEN v. NEALE, 2 N.C. 338 (1796) 2 S.E. 70. Emphasis added.

By this very principle espoused by the court you cannot be made to "retire elsewhere" because, if anything, you retire from the corporate STATE and live upon the land of the Lord in the geographical place called North Carolina rather than the State of North Carolina. Go back and look at the Hamilton case where they said that you "* * * shall take an oath of abjuration and allegiance, or depart out of the State." Let them keep their corporate State; depart out of it. Isn't that what the Bible tells you "Come out of her?" What do you need it for? To continually be robbed by legal plunder? Not that they are going to stop if you do, because maybe, just maybe, the masses will wake up and want out also, thereby destroying the State’s power over you.

You see, the whole game is to control you by making you, the man, into a artificial entity called a "person." In ordinary street language you can use the term person. But the minute you step into ANY legal arena you CANNOT use the term "person." For to do so the other artificial person, the State, can come after another artificial character. As the court stated above "man" is not bound by other men’s laws unless he consents. You consent when you answer to any statute containing any reference to person. The clever trick is that the statute 26 USC 7701(a) of the IRC is the definition part and it says "person" means; an individual, partnership, corporation, association. Notice that all terms defining the word "person are corporate fictions. BUT, you say, individual is not a corporate fiction because am I not an individual? Yes you are in average common street terms, but in the legal arena "individual is corporate or artificial by legal definition, because "individual," in and of itself is defining an artificial thing as a "person." So how can it be a natural man? It goes against all reason and logic. The IRC Code Statute only pertains to man, who as stated above by the Professor, takes on the artificial character and becomes a "person" by legal definition. Therefore he is subject to all the legal disabilities that come with the term person and that means being subject to all the laws of the parent corporation. The parent corporation is the United States, the State is the artificial child and you are the artificial grand child. That is the best way to describe it so you can start to equate terms and meanings.

In Anderson’s Business law on the Uniform Commercial Code, I think around the sixth edition, it states that when a statute refers to artificial beings, natural people are not to be included. So, 26 USC 7701 (a) (1) uses all artificial characters to describe the artificial "person" and individual. By all reason and logic it has to be an artificial term. Just like a third grade reader shows 5 pictures and asks which one does not belong. The pictures are, a baseball, a bat, a base, a glove and a football uniform. You circle the football uniform as not fitting the idea, but the football clothes is a uniform, the same as baseball clothes is a uniform. Only one uniform fits the scheme while the other is left out, but both are uniforms. The same as individual. It is a "leading word" as the professor stated and has to be further defined the same as individual or person has to be defined. Did not the professor state the term individual and person are one in the same? Did he not also state that it is well settled in law that "person" is always an artificial person? Refresh your memory by finding that part of his statement.

The Informer

Link to this webpage: http://www.atgpress.com/inform/tx021.htm
Against The Grain Press Website: http://www.atgpress.com/atgpress/indexag.htm
The Informer Website: http://www.atgpress.com/inform/indexinf.htm

See other The Informer postings/articles here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6420 and here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6419 and here: http://www.loveforlife.com.au/node/5149

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From Here: http://www.loveforlife.com.au/node/4893

Office Of The Person - The Official State Office Known As "Person" - Forced Office Of Person - Provided By Freedom School

[Note: Updated 20th June 2008]

1

Exhibit A

OFFICE OF THE PERSON

The official state office known as "person".

The word "person" in legal terminology is perceived as a general word, which normally includes in its scope a variety of entities other than human beings. See e.g., 1 U.S.C. sec.

1. Church of Scientology v U.S. Dept. of Justice (1979) 612 F. 2d 417, 425.

One of the very first of state statutes will have a section listed entitled "Definitions". Carefully study this section of the statutes and you will find a portion that reads similar to this excerpt: In construing these statutes and each and every word, phrase, or part hereof, where the context will permit;

(1) The singular includes the plural and vice versa.

(2) Gender-specific language includes the other gender and neuter.

(3) The word "person" includes individuals, children, firms, association, joint adventures, partnerships, estates, trusts, business trusts, syndicates, fiduciaries, corporations, and all other groups or combinations.

Note: However, the definitions do not list man or woman - therefore, they are excluded from all the statutes!

Under the rule of construction "expression unius est exclusion alterius," where a statute or constitution enumerates the things on which it is to operate or forbids certain things, it is ordinarily to be construed as excluding from its operation all those not expressly mentioned.

Generally words in a statute should be given their plain and ordinary meaning. When a statute does not specifically define words, such words should be construed in their common or ordinary sense to the effect that the rules used in construing statutes are also applicable in the construction of the Constitution. It is a fundamental rule of statutory construction that words of common usage when used in a statute should be constructed in their plain and ordinary sense.

If you carefully read the statute laws enacted by your state legislature you will find that they are all written with phrases similar to these examples:

 A person commits the offense of failure to carry a license if the person…

 A person commits the offense of failure to register a vehicle if the person…

 A person commits the offense of driving uninsured if the person…

 A person commits the offense of fishing if the person…

 5. A person commits the offense of breathing if the person…

Notice that only "persons" can commit these state legislature-created crimes. A crime is by definition an offense committed against the "state". If you commit an offense against a human, it is called a tort.

Examples of torts would be any personal injury, slander, or defamation of character.

2

So how does someone become a "person" and subject to regulation by state statutes and laws? There is only one way. You must ask the state for permission to volunteer to become a state person. You must volunteer because the U.S. Constitution forbids the state from compelling you into slavery. This is found in the 13th and 14th Amendments.

13th Amendment: Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for a crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the UNITED States or any place subject to their jurisdiction, found in section one.

14th Amendment, Section 1: All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the UNITED STATES and of the state wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law, which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the UNITED STATES; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law, nor deny any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

You become a state-created statutory "person" by taking up residency with the state and stepping into the office of "person". You must hold an "office" within the state government in order for that state government to regulate and control you. First comes the legislativelycreated office, then comes their control. If you do not have an office in state government, the legislature's control over you would also be prohibited by the Declaration of Rights section, usually found to be either Section I or II of the State Constitution.

The most common office held in a state is therefore the office known as "person". Your state legislature created this office as a way to control people. It is an office most people occupy without even knowing that they are doing so.

The legislature cannot lawfully control you because you are a flesh and blood human being.

God alone created you and by "Right of Creation", He alone can control you. It is the nature of law that what one creates, one controls. This natural law is the force that binds a creature to its creator. The way the state gets around God's law and thereby controls the people is by creating only an office, and not a real human. This office is titled as "person" and then the legislature claims that you are filling that office. Legislators erroneously now think that they can make laws that also control men. They create entire bodies of laws, motor vehicle code, building code, compulsory education laws, and so on ad nauseum. They still cannot control men or women, but they can now control the office they created.

And look who is sitting in that office…Person(s).

Then they create government departments to administer regulations to these offices. Within these administrative departments of state government are hundreds of other state-created offices. There is everything from the office of janitor to the office of governor. But these administrative departments cannot function properly unless they have subjects to regulate.

The legislature obtains these subjects by creating an office that nobody even realizes to be an official state office.

They have created the office of "person".

The state creates many other offices such as police officer, prosecutor, judge, etc., and everyone understands this concept. However, what most people fail to recognize and

3

understand is the most common state office of all, the office of "person". Anyone filling one of these state offices is subject to regulation by their creator, the state legislature. Through the state-created office of "person", the state gains its authority to regulate, control and judge you, the real human.

What they have done is apply the natural law principle, "What one creates, one controls."

A look in Webster's dictionary reveals the origin of the word "person." It literally means, "the mask an actor wears."

The legislature creates the office of "person" which is a mask. They cannot create real people; only God can do that. But they can create the "office" of "person", which is merely a mask, and then they persuade a flesh and blood human being to put on that mask by offering a fictitious privilege, such as a driver license. Now the legislature has gained complete control over both the mask and the actor behind the mask.

A resident is another state office holder. All state residents hold an office in the state government. But not everyone who is a resident also holds the office of "person".

 Some residents hold the office of judge and they are not person(s).

 Some residents hold the office of prosecutor and they are not person(s).

 Some residents hold the office of police officer and they are not person(s).

 Some residents hold the office of legislator and they are not person(s).

 Some residents are administrators and bureaucrats and they are not person(s).

 Some residents are attorney(s) and they are not person(s).

An attorney is a state officer of the court and is firmly part of the judicial branch. The attorney will tell you that they are "licensed" to practice law by the state Supreme Court.

Therefore, it is unlawful for any attorney to hold any position or office outside of the judicial branch.

There can be no attorney legislators, no attorney mayors, no attorneys as police, and no attorneys as governor. Yes, I know it happens all the time; however, this practice of multiple office-holding by attorneys is prohibited by the Constitution and is a felony in most states. If you read farther into your state constitution you will find a clause stating this - the "Separation of Powers" - which will essentially read as follows:

Branches of government - The powers of the state government shall be divided into legislative executive and judicial branches. No person belonging to one branch shall exercise any powers appertaining to either of the other branches unless expressly provided herein.

Therefore, a police officer cannot arrest a prosecutor, a prosecutor cannot prosecute a sitting judge, a judge cannot order the legislature to perform, and so on.

Because these "offices" are not "persons", the state will not, and cannot prosecute them; therefore, they enjoy almost complete protection by the state in the performance of their duties. This is why it is impossible to sue or file charges against most government employees. If their crimes should rise to the level where they "shock the community" and cause alarm in the people, then they will be terminated from their office or state employment and then they are arrested, now as a common "person", and charged for their crimes. Simply put, the state will not eat its own.

4

The reason all state residents hold an office is so the state can control everything. It wants to create every single office so that all areas of your life are under the complete control of the state. Each office has prescribed duties and responsibilities and all these offices are regulated and governed by the state. If you read the fine print when you apply for a state license or privilege, you will see that you must sign a declaration that you are in fact a "resident" of that state. "Persons" is a subset of "resident", judge is a subset of "resident", and legislators and police officers are subsets of "resident".

If you hold any office in the state, you are a "resident" and subject to all legislative decrees in the form of statutes.

They will say, "All men are free", because that is a true statement. They will always say that we are "free men". But they will never tell you that legislator-created "offices" that you are occupying are not free. What they do not say is that holding any state office binds free men into slavery for the state.

They are ever ready to trick you into accepting the state office of "person," and once you are filling that office, you cease to be a free man. You become regulated creatures, called "persons," totally created by the legislature. You will hear "free men" mentioned all the time, but you will never hear about "free persons."

If you build your life in an office created by the legislature, it will be built on shifting sands.

The office can be changed and manipulated at any time to conform to the whims of the legislature.

When you hold the office of "person" created by the legislature, your office isn't fixed. Your duties and responsibilities are ever changing. Each legislative session binds a "person" to ever more burdens and requirements in the form of more rules and statutes.

Most state constitutions have a section that declares the fundamental power of the people: Political power - All political power is inherent in the people. The enunciation herein of certain Rights shall not be construed to deny or impair others retained by the people.

Notice that this says "people"…it does not say "persons." This statement declares beyond any doubt that the people are Sovereign over their created government. This is natural law and the natural flow of delegated power.

A Sovereign is a private, non-resident, non-domestic, non-person, non-individual person, NOT SUBJECT to any real or imaginary statutory regulations of quasi-laws enacted by any state legislature which was created by the people.

When a Sovereign is pulled over by the police, roll down your window and say, "You are speaking to a Sovereign political power holder. I do not consent to you detaining me. Why are you detaining me against my will?"

Now the state office of "policeman" knows that "He", policeman, is talking to a flesh and blood Sovereign. The police officer cannot cite a Sovereign because the state legislature can only regulate what they create. And the state does not create Sovereign political power holders. It is very important to lay the proper foundation right from the beginning. Let the police officers know that you are a Sovereign. Remain in your proper office of Sovereign political power-holder. Do not leave it. Do not be persuaded by police officer pressure or tricks to put on the mask of a state "person."

Why aren't Sovereigns subject to the state's charges? Because of the concept of office. The state is attempting to prosecute only a particular office known as "person." If you are not in that state-created office of "person," the state statutes simply do not apply to you. This is

5

common sense. For example, if you are not in the state of Wisconsin, then Wisconsin rules do not apply to you. For the state to control someone, they have to first create the office.

Then they must coerce a warm-blooded creature to come fill that office. They want you to fill that office.

Here is the often-expressed understanding from the United States Supreme Court that in common usage, the term "person" does not include the Sovereign. Statutes employing the "person are ordinarily construed to exclude the Sovereign." Wilson v. Omaha Tribe, 442 U.S. 600, 604 (1941). See also, United States v. Mine Workers, 330 U.S. 258, 275 (1947).

The idea that the word "person" ordinarily excludes the Sovereign can also be traced to the "familiar principles that the King is not bound by any act of Parliament unless he be named therein by special and particular words." Dollar Savings Bank v. United States, 19 Wall 227, 239 (1874). As this passage suggests, however, this interpretive principle applies only to the enacting Sovereign, United States v. California, 297 U.S. 175, 186 (1936). See also Jefferson County Pharmaceutical Assn., Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories, 460 U.S. 150, 161, n 21 (1983). Furthermore, as explained in United States v. Herron, 20 Wall, 251, 255 (1874), even the principle as applied to the enacting Sovereign is not without limitations.

"Where an act of Parliament is made for the public good, as for the advancement of religion and justice or to prevent injury and wrong, the king is bound by such act, though not particularly named therein, but where a statute is general and thereby any prerogative, right, title, or interest is divested or taken from the king in such case the king is not bound, unless the statute is made to extend to him by express words."

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Holmes explained: "A Sovereign is exempt from suit, not because of any formal conception or obsolete theory, but on the logical and practical ground that there can be no legal Right as against the authority that makes the law on which the Right depends." - Kawananakoa v. Polyblank, 205 U.S. 349, 353, 27 S. Ct. 526, 527, 51 L. Ed. 834 (1907).

The majority of American states fully embrace the Sovereign immunity theory as well as the federal government. See Restatement (Second) of torts 895B, comment at 400 (1979). The following U.S. Supreme Court case makes clear all these principals. I shall have occasion incidentally to evince how true it is that states and governments were made for man, and at the same time, how true it is that his creatures and servants have first deceived, next vilified, and at last oppressed their master and maker.

A state, useful and valuable as the contrivance is, is the inferior contrivance of man, and from his native dignity derives all its acquired importance. Let a state be considered as subordinate to the people. But let everything else be subordinate to the state. The latter part of his position is equally necessary with the former. For in the practice and, even at length in the science of politics, there has very frequently been a strong current against the natural order of things, and an inconsiderate or an interested disposition to sacrifice the end to the means. As the government has claimed precedence over the people, so, in the same inverted course of things, the government has often claimed precedence over the state; and to this perversion in the second degree, many of the volumes of confusion concerning Sovereignty owe their existence. The ministers, dignified very properly by the appellation of the magistrates, have wished, and have succeeded in their wish, to be considered as the

6

Sovereigns of the state. This second degree of perversion is confined to the old world and begins to diminish even there, but the first degree is still to prevalent even in the Several states of which our union is composed. By a state, I mean a complete body of free persons united together for their common benefit, to enjoy peaceably what is their own, and to do justice to others. It is an artificial person. It has its affairs and the interests; it has its rules; it has its Rights; and it has its obligations. It may acquire property distinct from that of its members. It may incur debts to be discharged out of the public stock, not out of the private fortunes of individuals. It may be bound by contracts and for damages arising from the breach of those contracts. In all our contemplations, however, concerning this feigned and artificial person, we should never forget that in truth and nature, those who think and speak and act are "men." Is the foregoing description of a state a true description? It will not be questioned, but it is.

It will be sufficient to observe briefly that the Sovereignties in Europe, and particularly in England, exist on feudal principles. That system considers the prince as the Sovereign, and the people as his subjects; it regards his person as the object of allegiance and excludes the idea of his being on an equal footing with a subject, either in a court of justice or elsewhere. That system contemplates him as being the fountain of honor and authority; and from his grace and grant derives all franchise, immunities and privileges. It is easy to perceive that such a Sovereign could not be amenable to a court of justice or subjected to judicial control and actual constraint. It was of necessity, therefore, that suability became incompatible with such Sovereignty. Besides, the prince having all the executive powers, the judgment of the courts would in fact be only monitory, not mandatory to him, and a capacity to be advised is a distinct thing from a capacity to be sued. The same feudal ideas run through all their jurisprudence and constantly remind us of the distinction between the prince and the subject.

No such ideas exist here (speaking of America). At the Revolution, the Sovereignty devolved on the people and they are truly the Sovereigns of the country. But they are Sovereigns without subjects (unless the African slaves among us may be so called) and have none to govern but themselves. The citizens of America are equal as fellow citizens and as joint tenants in the Sovereignty. Chisholm v. Georgia (February Term, 1793) 2 U.S. 419 2D all. 419, 1 L Ed 440.

There are many ways you can give up your Sovereign power and accept the role of "person." One is by receiving state benefits. Another is by asking permission in the form of a license or permit from the state.

One of the subtlest ways of accepting the role of "person" is to answer the questions as a bureaucrat knocks on your door and wants to know why your children aren't registered in school, or a police officer pulls you over and starts asking questions. You immediately fill the office of "person" if you start answering questions. It is for this reason that you should ignore or refuse to "answer" their questions and instead act like a true Sovereign, a King or Queen, and ask only your own questions of them.

You are not a "person" subject to their laws. If they persist and haul you into their court unlawfully, your response to the judge is simple and direct. You the Sovereign must tell him:

 I have no need to answer you in this matter.

7

 It is none of your business whether I understand my Rights or whether I understand your fictitious charges.

 It is none of your business whether I want counsel.

 The reason it is none of your business is because I am not a "person" regulated by the state. I do not hold any position of office where I am subjected to the legislature.

 The state legislature does not dictate what I do.

 I am a free Sovereign "Man" (or "Woman") and I am a political power holder as lawfully decreed in the State Constitution at Article I (or II) and that constitution is controlling over you.

You must NEVER retain or hire an attorney, a state officer of the court, to speak or file written documents for you. Use an attorney (if you must) only for counsel and advice about their "legal" system. If you retain an attorney to represent you and speak in your place, you become "Non Compos Mentis" (not mentally competent) and you are then considered a ward of the court. You LOSE all your Rights, and you will not be permitted to do anything herein. The judge knows that as long as he remains in his office, he is backed by the awesome power of the state, its lawyers, armed police and prisons. The judge will try to force you to abandon your Sovereignty sanctuary by threatening you with jail. No matter what happens, if you remain faithful to your Sovereignty, the judge and the state may not lawfully move against you. The state did not create the office of Sovereign political power holder; therefore, they do not regulate and control those in the office of Sovereign. They cannot ascribe penalties for breach of that particular office. The reason they have no authority over the office of the Sovereign is because they did not create it and the Sovereign people did not delegate to them any such power. When challenged, simply remind them that they do not regulate any office of the Sovereign and that their statutes only apply to those state employees in legislator-created offices.

This Sovereign individual paradigm is explained by the following U.S. Supreme Court case: "The individual may stand upon his constitutional Rights as a citizen. He is entitled to carry on his private business in his own way. His power to contract is unlimited. He owes no such duty (to submit his books and papers for an examination) to the State since he receives nothing therefrom beyond the protection of his life and property. His Rights are such as existed by the law of the land [Common Law] long antecedent to the organization of the State, and can only be taken from him by due process of law and in accordance with the Constitution. Among his Rights are a refusal to incriminate himself and the immunity of himself and his property from arrest or seizure except under a warrant of the law. He owes nothing to the public so long as he does not trespass upon their Rights." Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43 at 47 (1905).

Let us analyze this case. It says, "The individual may stand upon his constitutional Rights." It does not say, "Sit on his Rights." There is a principle here. "If you don't use 'em, you lose 'em." You have to assert your Rights, demand them, "stand upon" them.

Next it says, "He is entitled to carry on his private business in his own way." It says "private business"
- you have a Right to operate a private business. Then it says "in his own way." It doesn't say "in the government's way."

8

Then it says, "His power to contract is unlimited." As a Sovereign individual, your power to contract is unlimited. In common law there are certain criteria that determine the validity of contracts. They are not important here except that any contract that would harm others or violate their Rights would be invalid.

For example, a "contract" to kill someone is not a valid contract. Apart from this obvious qualification, your power to contract is unlimited.

Next it says, "He owes no such duty (to submit his books and papers for an examination) to the State since he receives nothing therefrom beyond the protection of his life and property." The court case contrasted the duty of the corporation (an entity created by government permission - feudal paradigm) to the duty of the Sovereign individual. The Sovereign individual doesn't need and didn't receive permission from the government, hence has no duty to the government.

Then it says, "His Rights are such as existed by the law of the land (Common Law) long antecedent to the organization of the State." This is very important. The Supreme Court recognized that humans have inherent Rights. The Constitution for The United States of America (including the Bill of Rights) does not grant us Rights. We have fundamental Rights, irrespective of what the Constitution says. The Constitution acknowledges some of our Rights and Amendment IX states, "The enumeration in the Constitution of certain Rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people." The important point is that our Rights antecede [come before, are senior to] the organization of the state.

Next the Supreme Court says, "And [his rights] can only be taken from him by due process of law and in accordance with the Constitution." Does it say the government can take away your Rights? No! Your Rights can only be taken away "by due process of law, and in accordance with the Constitution." Due process of law involves procedures and safeguards such as trial by jury. "Trial by jury" means inter alia…the jury judges both the law and fact.

Then the case says, "Among his Rights are a refusal to incriminate himself and the immunity of himself and his property from arrest or seizure except under a warrant of the law." These are some of the Rights of a Sovereign individual. Sovereign individuals need not report anything about themselves or their business to anyone.

Finally, the Supreme Court says, "He owes nothing to the public so long as he does not trespass upon their Rights." The Sovereign individual does not have to pay taxes. If you should discuss Hale v. Henkel with a run-of-the-mill attorney, he or she will tell you that the case is "old" and that it has been "overturned." If you ask that attorney for a citation of the case or cases that overturned it, there will not be a meaningful response. Upon researching Hale v. Henkel, it was found: "We know that Hale v. Henkel was decided in 1905 in the U.S. Supreme Court. Since it was the Supreme Court, the case is binding on all courts of the land, until another Supreme Court case says it isn't. Has another Supreme Court case overturned Hale v. Henkel? The answer is NO. As a matter of fact, since 1905, the Supreme Court has cited Hale v. Henkel a total of 144 times. A fact more astounding is that since 1905, Hale v. Henkel has been cited by all the federal and state appellate court systems a total of over 1,600 times. None of the various issues of this case has ever been overturned.

So if the state through the "office" of the judge continues to threaten or does imprison you, they are trying to force you into the state-created office of "person." As long as you continue

9

to claim your Rightful office of Sovereign, the State lacks all jurisdiction over you. The state needs someone filling the office of "person" in order to continue prosecuting a case in their courts. Do not sign their papers or cooperate with them because most things about your life are private and are not the state's business to evaluate. Here is the Sovereign Peoples' command in the constitution that the state respect their privacy: Right of Privacy - Every man or woman has the Right to be let alone and free from government intrusion into their private life except as otherwise provided herein. This section shall not be construed to limit the public's Right of access to public records and meetings as provided by law.

--------------------------------------------

20th June 2008

From Eldon Warman - www.detaxcanada.org

This statement is not correct in that document:

"You become a state-created statutory "person" by taking up residency with the state and stepping into the office of "person". You must hold an "office" within the state government in order for that state government to regulate and control you. First comes the legislatively created office, then comes their control. If you do not have an office in state government, the legislature's control over you would also be prohibited by the Declaration of Rights section, usually found to be either Section I or II of the State Constitution."

You become a "person" - a "natural person" by 'attachment'. By using the legal identity name (which you must do under private necessity to sustain and maintain your life), you are considered an accessory attached to the Crown's property - the legal identity name that shows the family name as the primary name [surname, or first name in the 'nom de guerre' format (Warman, Eldon Gerald)] This applies to an adult free will man, as how the name becomes the property of the Crown in the first place is by the parents (under slave names) offering up the newborn child to the king (slave owner) called 'registration of live birth'.

(Regis = the King). The people who are 'officers' of the make-believe ship at sea, called the corporate Crown (of the City of London) then take the names recorded and change the family name to a surname (sur = primary, first, on top). It becomes the 'intellectual property of the Crown.

So, when the child, having been a ward of the Crown since birth, becomes an adult, and having been taught by the Jesuit controlled education, church and media educational system that he, and the Crown owned legal identity name are 'one and the same as his own name, uses that legal identity name, that man is assumed to be 'property of the Crown. An 'owned as property' man is a slave to the claimant of the property.

This is accomplished by the legal maxim, accessio cedit principali - an accessory attached to a principal becomes the property of the owner of the principal. In this case, the principal property is the legal identity name, and the accessory is the free will man who uses it 'voluntarily' (so it is assumed) and the owner is the corporate Crown of the City of London - itself being owned by the Pontiff of Rome. The City Crown is a 6 pointed crown representing the Star of David, an ancient Chaldean symbol of control over people.

Now, by using the above info, you will see that much of the content of the document you sent is bad info, and useless to free will man in his quest to regain his free will status.

At this time, a claim of right and a claim of 'non-voluntary' private necessity seems to be the only peaceful solution available.

Eldon Warman
www.detaxcanada.org

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Government Manipulation of Language - A Natural Person

Government Manipulation of Language
Source: http://www.natural-person.ca/govtricks.html

Government Tricks:

This is perhaps the most important page on this web-site.

First Trick:

The first "trick" of the Government is the re-definition of certain critical words in each Statute (Act). They (the Government) want you to assume the ordinary meaning of the word so as to trick you into reading and interpreting the Statute in their favour. Here is a summary of some of the Trick Words (http://1215.org/lawnotes/lawnotes/ccra_trick_words.pdf). Two key words that are re-defined in almost every Statute are the words "person" and "individual". There are at least two "person" in law:

A natural-person is a legal entity for the human-being.

An artificial-person is a legal entity that is not a human being.

Here are the exact definitions from Barron's Canadian Law Dictionary, fourth edition (ISBN 0-7641-0616-3):

* natural person. A natural person is a human being that has the capacity for rights and duties.
* artificial person. A legal entity, not a human being, recognized as a person in law to whom certain legal rights and duties may attached - e.g. a body corporate.

You will observe that the natural-person has the "capacity" (i.e. ability) for rights and duties, but not necessarily the obligation. The artificial-person has rights and duties that may be attached (i.e. assigned) by laws.

Second Trick:

The second "trick" of the Government is to use the Interpretation Act to define words that apply to all Statutes, unless re-defined within a particular Statute. Without this knowledge, you could assume the ordinary meaning for the words you are reading, not realizing that they may have been defined by the Interpretation Act. Unless these words have been re-defined in another Statute, the underlying definitions for the two most important words still apply, either from the Interpretation Act, or the Canadian Law Dictionary. Basically, they are defined as follows:

from the Canadian Law Dictionary we find that:
individual means a natural person,
from the Income Tax Act we find the re-definition:
individual means an artificial person.

from the Canadian Law Dictionary we find that:
person means an individual (natural person) or incorporated group (artificial person),
from the Interpretation Act we find the re-definition:
person means a corporation (an artificial- person),
from the Income Tax Act we find the re-definition again:
person means an artificial person (amongst other things).

In the Canadian Human Rights Act (http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/H-6/text.html) you will see how individual and person are used and how they apply to natural and artificial persons.

Third Trick:

The third "trick" of the Government is to use the word "includes" in definitions instead of using the word "means". They do this in some critical definitions that they want you to misinterpret. If they used "means" instead of "includes" then their deception would be exposed, but by using "includes" they rely upon the reader to assume that "includes" expands the definition, whereas in reality it restricts the definition in the same manner that "means" restricts the definition.

Here is a means definition of the word "person" from the Bank Act:

person means a natural person, an entity or a personal representative;

Here is an includes definition of the word "person" from the Interpretation Act:

person, or any word or expression descriptive of a person, includes a corporation

To expose their deception, substitute the word means and you have

person , or any word or expression descriptive of a person, means a corporation (viz. - artificial-person)

Both "means" and "includes" are restrictive in scope because they only encompass part of the whole. Typically they are used in the following form:

person means A or B or C (and nothing else).
person includes A and B and C (and nothing else).

From the above example, you will see the logical difference. The list that follows means is constructed using "or", whereas the list that follows includes is constructed using "and".

There is a Legal Maxim that supports the restriction of "includes":

Inclusio unius est exclusio alterius.
The inclusion of one is the exclusion of another.

The definition of the word include is key to understanding your potential loss of natural-person. This is the major trick used by the Government in an attempt to take away your natural-person rights. Unless you know this, you will voluntarily forfeit your rights.

Forth Trick:

The fourth "trick" of the Government is to modify how the word "includes" is used in order to make an expansion in the definition when such expansion is required. This "trick" helps add confusion to the use of "includes" convincing most readers that "includes" should always be expansive rather than limiting. Here are some legitimate ways in which "includes" is modified to become expansive rather than restrictive:

also includes
and includes
includes, without limitation,
including
including but not limited to

The expansive definitions usually take the following form:

person means A or B or C and includes D. (A,B, C and D)

However, there is also a possibility that "and includes" is restrictive in some constructions. There are some people investigating this possibility right now. Their logic is demonstrated by the following example of a definition that states:

province means a province of Canada and includes Ontario and Quebec.

So, if we presume that "and includes" does provide expansion then we must ask why Ontario and Quebec had to be specifically mentioned when they are already part of a so-called province.

The above construction clearly defines the scope of what is meant by province, that is a province of Canada (it does not say which one), and includes only Ontario and Quebec (compiled from a list of two from the original scope of all provinces). In this construction means provides the scope of the definition and includes provides the list of what is actually included in the definition.

The foregoing analysis is one interpretation, but is not the only interpretation. The use of "includes" in statutory definitions can be argued both ways and is the backbone of understanding interpretations.

With the presumption that "and includes" is restrictive, then we must take a very close look at the following definition, taken from the Interpretation Act:

province means a province of Canada and includes the Yukon Territory, the Northwest Territories and Nunavut .

With this presumption what is stated is: unless another statute re-defines province, the default definition of province only includes the Yukon Territory, the Northwest Territories and Nunavut.

So in order to not become absurd, we must allow for "and includes" to be expansive, however more work needs to be done on this subject before placing the last nail in the coffin, so to speak.

Definitions:

Barron's Canadian Law Dictionary does not provide definitions for "include" or "means" therefore we have to look in the next source (http://www.natural-person.ca/definitions.html) for the definitions.

From Black's Law Dictionary, fourth edition, here is the definition for the word "include":

* include. To confine within, hold as in an inclosure, take in , attain, shut up, contain, inclose, comprise, comprehend, embrace, involve. Including may, according to context, express an enlargement and have the meaning of and or in addition to, or merely specify a particular thing already included within general words theretofore used.
* inclose. To surround; to encompass; to bound; fence, or hem in, on all sides.

It is stated in the above definition that the verb include is clearly restrictive and only has limited scope. On the other hand the participle, including (but not limited to) enlarges the scope.

Therefore the conclusion is that when used in a definition, include does not expand the existing definition of the word it is attempting to define. It is easy to be confused because we naturally assume the existing definition of the word, then assume include means to add this new interpretation to the existing assumed definition of the word. Our assumptions fail us in this case.

From now on, when you see the word includes, mentally substitute the word means and you will not be "tricked" by this definition any more.

For the Doubting Thomas:

If you look into any statute, you will be able to find a definition that uses the word includes and when you attempt to broaden the scope of that word to include the ordinary meaning, you will find that the statute will break down because it will not be able to support the inclusion of the ordinary meaning of the word. The breakdown usually occurs when slavery is invoked.

"Whereas it is essential, if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression, that human rights should be protected by the rule of law,"
(Preamble - Universal Declaration of Human Rights): http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html

Link: http://1215.org/lawnotes/lawnotes/language.htm

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LANGUAGE AND DICTIONARIES

"How's the dictionary getting on?" Winston asked his comrade Syme, who worked with him in the Research Department.

"We're getting the language into its final shape," Syme answered. "By the year 2050 at the very latest not a single human being will be alive who could understand the conversation we are having now."
1984, George Orwell.

In America we speak three languages: Slang, Formal English, and Legal English, Though simular, if one tries to communicate using one language while the listener is listening using another language, there is great opportunity for miscommunication. This article is written in Legal English.

Slang

It's the language of the street. It is a dynamic, loosely defined language, and it can vary considerably from one geographical area to the next. It abounds with special and paradoxical interpretations. Once must "grow up" with the language to fully appreciate its peculiarities.

Foreigners always have great difficulty dealing with the various idioms. For example, if you think something is genuinely wonderful, you could say either, "That's really cool!" or "That's really hot!" Another way to express great approval is to exclaim, "That's B-A-D!" or "That's G-O-O-D!"

Formal English

Precise communications require a more formal structure. Formal English is taught in the schools, and it is the language of choice when strangers meet to execute common transactions. It is a stable language that typically requires multi-decades or centuries to evolve its meanings.

Unless otherwise specified, English dictionaries cast all words in Formal English, with the more common usage placed at the beginning of the definition. Dictionaries often will show slang or legal meanings as well. They are placed after the more popular usages.

This author favors Webster's 1828 Dictionary (which is also online: http://www.christiantech.com [but as of this writing, temporarily offline]) because it is useful in understanding words used in the U.S. Constitution. G. & C. Merriam Webster's unabridged dictionary published in 1953 and earlier is great for modern meanings.

Legal English

When you want accuracy in communication, Legal English is the preferred language. Also known as King's English, or the Language of the Court Room, Legal English is extremely stable, requiring thousands of years for changes in meaning.

Because accuracy is required for good legal communication, legal definitions tend to be rather verbose. The extended explanations are necessary to achieve that accuracy. Legal dictionaries are not all called dictionaries. The more thorough dictionaries are entitled "Corpus Juris" and "Words and Phrases." A given word could require fifty or more pages to arrive at its exact meaning. Other dictionaries (in descending order of this author's preference) include Bouvier's Law Dictionary (1872 Edition), Ballentine's Law Dictionary, and Black's Law Dictionary (4th edition or earlier).

Later editions of Bouvier's Law Dictionary are more like legal encyclopedias

Black's Law Dictionary, 5th through 7th Editions are not as accurate because references to common law are progressively removed, and Roman Civil Law concepts are augmented in order to conform to the law enforcement needs of political power centers such as the Federal Government and the United Nations.

The rule of thumb is that older dictionaries are useful for understanding natural rights, common law, personal sovereignty, and the people's point of view. Newer dictionaries are useful for understanding civil rights, Roman civil law, centralized authority, and the government's point of view. All attorneys are trained in the latter. Judges may go to special seminars to learn the former.

For an excellent research paper on the use of dictionaries in the Supreme Court of the United States, see Kevin Werbach's LOOKING IT UP: The Supreme Court's Use of Dictionaries in Statutory and Constitutional Interpretation http://werbach.com/stuff/hlr_note.html (1994).

Link: http://1215.org/lawnotes/lawnotes/language.htm

Re: Government Manipulation of Language - A Natural Person

Thanks Arthur - very useful and helpful post.

What A Load Of Crap

You do not live in a utopia where you have the right to do what you want. You live in a society. That road was paid for by tax payers. People like me who have a job paid for that road. Do you have a job? Money raised from registration of vehicles goes to that road. Your vehicle was apparently unregistered, wasn't it? You had no right to use that road. It is not a basic right of humanity to do so, so unless you want to abide by the rules of society, expect society to treat you like the morons you are.

Don't break the law - you don't get stopped by Police.

Don't refuse to abide by further laws, you get arrested. It is that simple.

You are the reason that there should be a mental aptitude test when logging on to the net. There would be a lot less morons on here if that were the case.

How's that for free speech?

P.S. If oyu are going to write what you believe are incredibly smart and logical legal documents such as the tripe you tried to serve on this officer, then at least run a spell check on it. Big difference between peruse and pursue.

Re: What A Load Of Crap

Dear Anonymous
I have already provided enough information in my last reply to you here: Re: Laws Broken?: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6375#comment-1586

Under your full commercial liability please sign a notarised affidavit stating that money or tax or society or tax payer or registration or license or laws or registration or mind (mental aptitude test) or rules or vehicle or humanity (hu-man-it-y) EXIST as part of CREATION bearing the consciousness of creation, are able to co-create creation, are not dead corpses (fiction), are part of reality, are FIRST PARTIES, are able to take full responsibility, are capable of creating substance which is provided as an equal exchange in value (of life giving substance) to benefit MAN (of substance) and are not acting props of a fairytale.

Did you know that the fictional corporation that is the ATO is a fictional subsidiary of the fictional corporation INLAND REVENUE SERVICE, USA, meaning that so called fictional taxes goes overseas to the IRS!

I look forward to receiving your signed and witnessed affidavit under your full commercial liability.

All the best
Arthur Cristian
Love For Life

You will be waiting a while

You will be waiting a while for anything from me.

Interesting to note though, I have had a little browse through all the crap you post on this site of yours. Funny how most of what i found was just links to other peoples words and very little of your own, except when your stupid wife gets herself arrested by acting like an idiot in the name of your bent cause...then you go on and on and on and on and on and on...and with complete and utter bullshit at that.

You should have your children taken from you before you turn them into mindless cretins too!

Looks To Me Like You Should Be Arrested

for ugliness of the titties, indecent exposure of said boobs, and surliness of your actions. I cannot think of any country far and wide on this plain of existence that allows such wanton flagrancy of the law that you seem to purport as your "rights."

Plus, naming your child that ridiculous name, if it doesn't scar her in new south wales (and it probably won't, among the hate-filled penguins you mope around with) it will in every other corner of the civilized world. I would advocate to her she change her name to something not resembling a prophecy comet - sooner rather than later.

I implore you to take a giant dose of dicks in a bowl in the morning, chew them up into little digestible pieces, and wash them down with gallons of bullshit before surfacing your ineffably disgusting self to the interwebs.

likewise,

font9a

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

15th June 2009 10.33am

Our apologies to anyone offended by the filthy language and images of the above and below posting. We have left them up there because, after all, we support freedom of speech. By the way, Xanthe is a Greek name. Her Grandmother (Greek Cypriot) is very happy that we have given one of her grandchildren a name from her culture.

Fiona & Arthur Cristian
Love For Life

FREE SPEECH!! HA

I see your opinions of free speech have changed dramatically now that someone is actually calling your bullshit what it is...BULLSHIT.

Yesterday I had no problems adding comments and replies to your "free speech" website.

Today I not only need to repeatedly go through that CAPTCHA crap, but i needed an email address to add to it (which I had to make one on Yahoo as I don't want you nutjubs contacting me), and on top of that now it is being moderated before posting.

Free speech my ass!! You are not only crazy, but you are hypocritical liars. I bet you don't even believe half this garbage but are making a heap of money preying on the gullible and insane by getting their paypal dollars.

Re: Free Speech!! HA

Dear Anonymous
You lack sincerity and purity of intent behind all your postings thus far.

Your IP address was already tracked yesterday and you were found posting many comments around the website just to be abusive, a smart arse and basically nasty. You are going out of your way to make things personal, blatantly attacking the MAN and WOMAN that we are instead of just focusing on arguing over any particular subject. This reveals that you are presently very immature and emotionally undeveloped.

If you are unable to take full-responsibility for your behaviour and attitude and show respect with those whose points of view you do not agree with tells us that you are a trouble maker, a shit stirrer, an antagonist determined to cause a controversy where there isn't one and will most definitely step over the mark to do harm. You lack sincerity and purity of intent because you have no conscience, no empathy and no compassion and without these virtues of love you can easily fall into a state of EVIL PSYCHOSIS, something like a mild or strong version of a Hannibal Lecter.

Do you have any incontrovertible evidence (substance) where we have had any personal dealings with you, where we have physically hurt you or ripped you off or have harmed you??? As far as we are concerned we have never met you, never had any personal dealings with you, never lived with you or worked with you and most definitely have never caused you or your family any harm!!!

In most cases where you posted a comment on a main-page where many articles/videos were listed as sub-headings, you never even bothered to study any of them or watch the videos etc to know what is actually being discussed. You were quickly in and out of one category to another posting crass comments here and there just to be abusive and nothing else.

No mater the subject matter you were offering no rational logical debate. You were and still are acting like a spoilt brat graffiti kid spraying ugly graffiti on any wall you could find (in this case over any man or woman you felt like doing it to) without showing any respect. We have no problem if you want to argue/debate a point of view constructively but that is almost impossible with you because you are presently showing up as an arrogant pigheaded smart arse who has only one thing on his brain and that is to be abusive, nasty and hateful.

You offer almost nothing as an equal exchange in value.

If you are a parent acting before your children the way you are presently acting in this website as revealed through your writing you would be setting an example to your children to have no respect for anyone. You are teaching and promoting RULES OF THE DIVIDE.

There are some who post comments in the Love For Life website who do not agree with something stated by another/others and they will argue and debate, argue and debate and argue and debate but they always show respect with those whose points of view they do not agree with.

You show no respect Anonymous.

It is impossible to be part of a website that offers freedom of speech if you do not respect the freedom of speech of those involved in the website just as you will find no love coming back from a woman whose been constantly bashed, tormented, manipulated, abused, ridiculed, laughed at, undermined etc etc by you. What you create comes bouncing back at you in the image of your projections.

If you do not show respect for the forest and you completely destroy it, the forest will have nothing left to offer you.

Love For Life

Arthur Cristian
Love For Life

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Support The Love For Life Campaign, Kindom & The Cristian Family

Supporting The Love For Life Website, The Cristian Family and The Living Dream Of Kindom (Creation Of Do No Harm Communities) - The Love for Life website is produced for free without a fee (no contract or conditions attached) as a gift of love for the benefit of others. If you feel you have gained something from visiting it, feel inspired, and would like to reciprocate as an equal exchange in substance and support (value), you are most welcome to make a gift of love to keep it and the dream of Kindom going. As always, we thank you for your gifts of love.

Additional Options

Bank:
Account name:
BSB:
Account number:
SWIFT BIC Code:
Australia New Zealand Banking Group (ANZ)
Fiona Caroline Cristian
012 547
5576 81376
ANZBAU3M

PAY PAL

Go To Your Pay Pal Account To Send Gifts To action @ loveforlife.com.au
Additional Options

 

The Cristian Family November 2006

We Stand For NO SYSTEM

Kindom (Do No Harm Communities) is the dream for freedom, but it is the dream for the freedom of those around us who also live the dream of freedom, because it is in living for the freedom of others that we get our freedom. When we live for the dreams of Kindom of those around us, we live life as a gift because we live for (dedicate our lives to) their dream of freedom, truth, peace, joy, abundance, etc, just as they live for our Kindom dreams too. This is true co-creation (cooperation) with no attack on the uniqueness of each of us. When we live this way, we have no need for any man-made system - everything/everyone has already been taken care of by our love for life.

Just as we do not have to jump 10 feet across the room to grab our next breath, neither do we have to worry about food, water and shelter because it has all been taken care of as we each co-create Kindoms/Kin-Domains for everyone. Now everybody and everything of the dream of life that is Kindom/Paradise is free (has been set free once again). The issue is greed and selfishness, power and control trips, arrogance, ignorance, being fed many many lies and being traumatised. The issue is not overpopulation - there is more than enough land available for every family to have a hectare (2.5 acres Kin-Domain) to care for. The land of Australia can provide a Kin-Domain for every family across Earth, each with a food forest, clean fresh drinking water and plenty of space for building natural do no harm habitats and with plenty of land left over.

Everyone must have the freedom to take full-responsibility for their lives, for the water they drink, the food they eat and for their shelter. Currently, "The System" forces everyone to give up taking full-responsibility so that we become grown up children accustomed to sucking on the nipples of "The System" corporations for everything, having to use money to get by and to follow the rules of money because we are not co-creating freedom, peace, truth, joy and abundance for each other. Money only leads to haves and have nots and all the abuse, manipulation and distractions that we are subjected to as slaves to money.

When we give up living for other's Kindom dreams, we start creating hell ("The System") all around us because we become self-centred - now it's all about "my freedom","my money", "my land", "my belief", "my saviour", "mine", "mine","mine", "i","i", "i", "own", "own", "own", etc. To protect what we claim we own requires a man-made system with FORCE to protect those self-centred claims. This is ALL trauma based and all story-telling (brainwashing/braindirtying).

NO SYSTEM = KINDOM/DO NO HARM COMMUNITIES
NO SYSTEM = KINDOM/DO NO HARM COMMUNITIES photo Kindom_zpsa6d24e8a.jpg

Our true freedom comes when we set our thoughts of freedom into motion so that we live freedom rather than just talking and thinking about it while we still slave for "The System". Kindom will not happen while we meditate for hours in the bush or do yoga retreats or wait for Jesus or follow the processes of the OPPT (One People's Public Trust now called One People). This is not freedom because we are not living freedom because we are living the story-telling of Jesus or Zeitgeist or The Secret or Thrive or One Earth/Consciousness/People.

Living Kindom is very, very hard work as we set about repairing the damage to MAN/Earth/Nature that we are ALL responsible for but the burden becomes lighter the more of us put our life-energy into the dream of returning Earth to Paradise. Day-after-day, we all have to work our arses off until Kindom is all around us (MAN) once again. This is the price we pay to set each other free on a piece of land (Kin-Domain), so that no one is under the image-power (education/brainwashing/story-telling) of another MAN anymore and so that everyone can have their space of love to create and live their unique, do no harm dreams. This only happens once we have the Kindoms set up so that everyone is provided for.

Once we re-create the food forests, whether on land or in the suburbs, we can re-claim our freedom, breaking the strangle-hold of "The System" because we are no longer reliant on its services and benefits and no longer turning each other into slaves of "The System", cogs in the wheels of "The System" machine. If we don't put the effort in to set everyone and everything free all around us then we still live in HELL ("The System"). The key is to live for everyone else's freedom so that we can have it too.

From Bare Dirt To Abundance
A Year In The Life Of The
Love For Life Food Forest

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
8th February 2013
51 Minutes 46 Seconds
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1sJCcCvZ97A

We live for NO SYSTEM. We do not lose anything by not having a man-made system and, in fact, we gain. We gain our freedom and we gain abundance. Let go of the fear.

The Cristian Family November 2006

A Collection Of Various Love For Life Posts
Providing The Big Picture We See

Sequential Order

We ask you to NOT believe anything we say/share and instead use scrutiny like an intense blow torch and go where the logic of truth/sense takes you. This is very, very important. Put everything you believe up to the test of scrutiny to see how it stacks up. If you are true to your heart/senses and go where the logic of truth/sense takes you will find that NO belief, etc, will stand up to the test of scrutiny. They just do not stack up because they are lies/fraud.

After you have watched and read all the material and any questions are left unanswered, send us your landline number and we will use the internet phone as a free unlimited call. We are on Sydney NSW Australia time. Best times for us to chat are between 11.00am and 6.00pm.

It is critical that you fully comprehend Image Power, "Spelling", Trauma, Reaction To Trauma, Curses, Processing Curses, Full-Responsibility/Liability, Limited Liability/Responsibility (passing-the-back), Slavery, Senses/Sense vs Non-Sense/Senses, Re-Presenting Intellectual Property such as but not limited to "Name", Storytelling/Storytellers, Duality, Black-Magic, Belief, Lies, "i", All Seeing "i" (eye), etc..... These themes and others are covered over and over and over again.

If you do not comprehend these insights and are unable to use your senses to sense your way through all the non-sense/non-sensory-images that enslave MAN under their image power (darkness = "The System" = Hell), men and women will remain deeply trapped under a terrible state of trauma. Our intention is to inspire you to remedy by showing you how to move away from reacting to trauma in all its nefarious and devious forms.

His-Story/Her-Story (History)
Arthur Cristian - Love For Life
2005-2007 - Re-posted July 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8529

The Dream Of Life Part 6
Under The Spell Of Intellectual Property

Arthur Cristian - 51 Minutes 52 Seconds
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IMK7CkU1ih8

The "Name" Is The Mark Of The Beast
The Strawman Identifying
Your Slave Status In "The System"

By Arthur Cristian - Love For Life
5th February 2012 - 56 Minutes 25 Seconds
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DdOag66v7uo

IMAGE POWER
The Nefarious Tactics Used
To Disguise Truth And Distract Us
From Remedy

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
24th January 2014
This post contains many recent Facebook comments
and email replies which collectively provides a big picture
into exposing the deception behind IMAGE POWER.
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8496

The Pull Of E-Motion
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
8th February 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8499

IMAGE POWER
Superb Diamond Range Interviewing
Arthur & Fiona Cristian 4th February 2014
http://youtu.be/qFnuuw3kLog
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8501

Trauma Induced Fantasy
July 2013 Interview With
Jeanice Barcelo And Arthur & Fiona Cristian
http://youtu.be/CZVj-ddUoZw
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8500

Processing Curses
A Lie Is A Curse
Liars Process Curses

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
26th February 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8503

How The System Is Really Constructed
Bouncing Back Curses Upon Curse Makers
To Stop Harm Forevermore

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
27th February 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8504

Slave To A Name
Parts One, Two, Three, Four,
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
3rd to 6th March 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8505

Educated Slaves
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
20th March 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8506

The Only Path To Freedom
Beware The False Steps

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 2nd April 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8508

Free-Dumb For All
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 5th April 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8510

Revoking The Ego
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 8th April 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8511

How MAN Commits Spiritual Suicide
Arthur Cristian
Love For Life - 3rd April 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8509

How To Detect Intel Operatives Working
For The New World Order Agenda
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 10th April 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8512

How The Psyop Program & Intel Networks
Are Messing With Your Head +
His-Story/Her-Story

Arthur & Fiona Cristian - April 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8513

Godzilla Through The Looking Glass
Destroyed By Name"

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 20th April 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8514

What It's Going To Take
To Co-Create Freedom Forevermore

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 22nd April 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8514

Falling For Fairy Stories
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 24th April 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8514

A Disassociation From The Work
Of Kate of Gaia

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 17th May 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8517

Separating The Wheat From The Chaff
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 22nd May 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8516

Revolution Or Revolution
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 25th May 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8520

Routing Out Psyop Programs
Routs Out Intel Operatives
Exposing Max Igan's Psyop Program

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 31st May 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8524

The Psyop Program Scam
Behind Religion Belief Faith
& Associated Opinion

Arthur Cristian
Love For Life
11th June 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8525

Another Delusion
Arthur Cristian
Love For Life
11th June 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8526

A World Of Words Is A World Of Lies
Arthur Cristian
Love For Life
13th June 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8527

E-MAN
The Name Of The Beast Is MAN

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 9th May 2014
Includes Mountain MAN Arrested
Facebook Discussion About "Name"
Uploaded 25th June 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8528

E-Motion
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 13th August 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8537

Discussion With Brother Gregory
Clearly Demonstrating Christianity
Is Part Of The Problem
And Not The Solution

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
Between the 12th May 2014 and 30th August 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8542

The Psyop Program Behind Free Food
And Permaculture

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
29th October 2014
Facebook Discussion With Unconditional Love Moon
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8544

Crop Circles Are A Massive Hoax
Facebook Discussion On Simon Kawai's Wall
Involving Arthur & Fiona Cristian
31st August 2013
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8470

OPPT & Slavery Through Intellectual Conscription By Deceit
Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life
27th February 2013 onwards...
Part One: http://youtu.be/Qjp_9nlrBao
Part Two: http://youtu.be/tbybeOWZ-Bc
Part Three: http://youtu.be/yOWoxH-HbVw

Water Is The Life Of MANS Consciousness (Breath)
Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life - 8th February 2013
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8350
Part One: http://youtu.be/4ze66_33wxM - 70 Minutes 5 Seconds
Part Two: http://youtu.be/43gIi-sjxJc - 81 Minutes 13 Seconds
Part Three: http://youtu.be/oooY6W63K-M - 70 Minutes 18 Seconds

What Do You Believe On Origins?
Who Said There Was A Beginning?
Who's Truth Do You Accept?
Belief Is A Strange Idea.

Discussion Lyndell, Scott and Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Between March and April 2013
Posted 29th October 2013
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8487

So You Want The Good Bits Of "The System"
But Not The Bad Bits?

By Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 12th August 2013
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8468

Turning Away From The Reflection
Of MANS Looking Glass

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
30th April 2013
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8404

REMEDY

From Bare Dirt To Abundance
A Year In The Life Of The
Love For Life Food Forest

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
8th February 2013
51 Minutes 46 Seconds
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1sJCcCvZ97A

Control The Land
And You Control MAN On The Land
Displace MAN From Land
And You Turn MAN Into Slaves

Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life
April 2011 (Updated 14th September 2011)
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8237

The Divine Spark
Facebook Discussion With Raymond Karczewski
Arthur & Fiona Cristian & Others
2nd October 2013
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8483

Capturing Another MANS Uniqueness
A Facebook Debate With
Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life
And Raymond Karczewski
Starting 13th May 2013
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8414

The Spell Is Broken
Taking The Land To Create Kindom

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
3rd March 2013
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8365

The Steps Of Kindom
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life 2006/2007
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8304

To explore these themes in greater detail go here where you can find links to all our Love For Life comments, articles, debates, discussions, videos, podcasts, etc: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/3385

All the best
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life

Website: http://loveforlife.com.au
Email : action@loveforlife.com.au
Mobile : 0011 61 418 203204 - (0418 203204)
Snail Mail: PO Box 1320 Bowral 2576 NSW Australia
Facebook Arthur Cristian : http://www.facebook.com/arthurcristian
YouTube Arthur Cristian : http://www.youtube.com/ArthurLoveForLife

Register To The Love For Life Mailing List: http://loveforlife.com.au/content/09/05/14/mailing-list

Facebook Group Why Aren't We Free Discussion : http://www.facebook.com/164918753537287
Facebook Group Kindom/Do No Harm Community Discussion : http://www.facebook.com/151811728195925

Links below will kick in when the professionally recorded Love For Life music is released.

SoundCloud : http://soundcloud.com/loveforlife
Nimbit Music : http://www.nimbitmusic.com/loveforlife
Twitter : https://twitter.com/loveforlifemusi
Facebook Music : http://www.facebook.com/loveforlifemusic
YouTube Love For Life Music : http://www.myspace.com/loveforlifemusic
MySpace : http://www.myspace.com/loveforlifemusic
Google + Fiona Cristian : https://plus.google.com/100490175160871610090

Peaceful Transition Through Sacrifice And Service

We feel there is an essential peaceful do no harm transition required to get all of MAN back to standing on MANS feet without reliance upon another MAN for water, food, shelter. As it stands everyone in "The System" are highly dependent and reliant on the "group mind-set" that forms "The System" of slaves providing services and benefits for the emotionally addicted slaves to "The System" (and you can put us in the same basket too). The transition is to get MAN back to relying ONLY on nature without 3rd party interlopers, intermeddlers, interceders getting in the way. The transition is a team effort with the foresight for setting all of MAN free down-the-line so that MAN is no longer dependent on slaves and masters providing services, benefits, privileges and exclusivity while being bound to contracts, rituals, procedures, conditions, rules & regulations which compromises MAN severely.

This transition is all about shifting from limited liability/responsibility to full liability/responsibility. This full responsibility is all about caring for our health, nature all around us, clean uncorrupted (pure) water and food, partner/co-creator, children, shelter, animal-friends in partnership, etc. In "The System", we are already together destroying each other - we have to come together to create peace together so that we can all have peace. We cannot live peacefully when we are islands, not taking full responsibility for the lives of those around us until EVERYONE can take full responsibility for their life, which means that EVERYONE is healed of system trauma. In "The System", we all come together to make slaves of each other - now is the moment to come together to set each other free, to live for each other's freedom, peace, joy and abundance. Once we have set each other free, we are free.

Control The Land
And You Control MAN On The Land
Displace MAN From Land
And You Turn MAN Into Slaves

Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life
April 2011 (Updated 14th September 2011)
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8237

The Spell Is Broken
Taking The Land To Create Kindom

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
3rd March 2013
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8365

"The Steps Of Kindom"
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8304

---------

Once we fix these issues, we or our children or our descendants to come, can start focusing on the even bigger picture of getting back to where our ancestors were, as breatharyan's, before they fell into non-sense images to be enslaved by them.

All the best to you and your family
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life

The Cristian Family November 2006

The Cristian Family Declaration

The Cristian family and The Love for Life Campaign are apolitical, non-religious, non-violent, anti weapons, anti drugs (both pharmaceutical and recreational) and anti any ideology that denies the existence of Do No Harm Communities (Kindoms) and suppresses the uniqueness and freedom of all men, women and children.

The Cristian family and our Love For Life work is unaligned to any big business corporation, intelligence agency, government body, "system" law, "system" think tanks, "system" green or environmental movements, religion, cult, sect, society (fraternity, brotherhood, sisterhood, order, club, etc,) secret or not, hidden agenda, law or sovereignty group, occult, esoteric, New Age or Old Age.

The Cristian family supports and promotes the remedy that brings an everlasting peace, freedom, truth, joy, abundance and do no harm for all of life without causing loss of uniqueness or the need for having slaves and rulers. We are not into following the one in front or being shepherds for sheeple. Most importantly, we take full-responsibility for everything we think, feel and do.

The Cristian family are not Christians.

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life

December 2006

The Cristian Family November 2006

THE CRISTIAN FAMILY PLEDGE

Being of clear brain, heart and intention, we each declare the following to be true:

• We have no intention of ending our own lives.

• We will not tolerate suppression of truth, ideas, freedom, or our work. We stand for freedom of speech.

• We stand together to support others in the expression of truths and freedom to speak out no matter how radical those ideas may seem.

• Standing for freedom takes courage; together we shall be strong in the face of all odds.

• If it is ever claimed that we have committed suicide, encountered an unfortunate accident, died of sickness/disease, disappeared, been institutionalized, or sold out financially or in any other way to self-interested factions, we declare those claims false and fabricated.

• We testify, assert and affirm without reservation, on behalf of all those who have dedicated their lives to the ending of secrecy and the promotion of freedom of thought, ideas and expression that we shall prevail.

• We Do Not Have Multiple Personality Disorders

Arthur Cristian
Fiona Cristian
Jasmin Lily Cristian
Emma Rose Cristian
Frances Hannah Cristian
Xanthe Jane Cristian

15th December 2006 (Edited/Updated 18th September 2011)

The Cristian Family November 2006

Update Regarding The Love For Life
Home Page And Quick User Guide

We are turning the Love for Life Quick User Guide http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6608 into a blog of all the main insights of our work since March 2005, whether through articles, videos, podcasts or discussions/debates.

As we do not have the time to compile everything we have written into a book, as many have suggested we do, compiling all our most important work into one area of the website is a way of providing easy access to this work so those interested are able to fully comprehend the big picture.

Instead of having to find our different articles, videos, etc, in various parts of the website, it will all be accessible here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6608 and here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/3385.

Love For Life Videos

As amateurs and posted in the Quick User Guide below the Facebook links, we're currently creating and posting a series of videos called "The Dream Of Life" which covers the ground of all the Love For Life insights. We plan to have the videos completed by December 31st 2012. Once this is behind us, our intention is to create a 2 hour or so video covering the body of this work. All videos are embedded in the quick user guide http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6608 and uploaded in Arthur's YouTube channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/ArthurLoveForLife.

Love For Life Music

We have started recording songs, with others, that express the themes of Love For Life. They are now being posted on Arthur's YouTube channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/ArthurLoveForLife and are embedded in the quick user guide http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6608. We have over 100 songs to record. A few rough demos have already been used as the soundtrack on the first "Dream of Life" video.

About Us - Love For Life & The Cristian Family

Also, everything we, the Cristian family, have gone through, from bank fraud and the theft of the family home to death threats and attempts on Arthur's life, is documented in the Quick User Guide too. If you, the reader, are prepared to put the effort in, you will comprehend the extent to which we have all been tricked into becoming slaves, giving up our uniqueness and our full-responsibility for life and destroying everything of life to the point where life is in danger of dying out completely. You will also comprehend the remedy to all this chaos; a remedy that requires only love for life and the determination to do what needs to be done. Though our focus is very strongly on the remedy that creates a world of freedom, truth, peace, joy, abundance and Do No Harm for all of life without loss of uniqueness or the need for slaves and rulers, we realise that it is vital to comprehend how to get there and what stops us from getting there. This is why there is so much information on the hows and whys of everything going wrong in the world today. We are not into peddling conspiracy theories, we are into routing out all forms of organised crime.

Saturday 26th November 2011

Arthur and Fiona Cristian
Love For Life

Website: http://loveforlife.com.au
Email: action@loveforlife.com.au
Mobile: 0011 61 418 203204 - (0418 203204)
Facebook Arthur Cristian: http://www.facebook.com/arthurcristian
YouTube Arthur Cristian: http://www.youtube.com/ArthurLoveForLife
SoundCloud: http://soundcloud.com/loveforlife
Nimbit Music: http://www.nimbitmusic.com/loveforlife
Twitter: https://twitter.com/loveforlifemusi
Facebook Music: http://www.facebook.com/loveforlifemusic
Facebook Why Aren't We Free Discussion: http://www.facebook.com/164918753537287
Facebook Do No Harm Community: http://www.facebook.com/151811728195925
YouTube Love For Life Music: http://www.myspace.com/loveforlifemusic
MySpace: http://www.myspace.com/loveforlifemusic
Google + Fiona Cristian: https://plus.google.com/100490175160871610090
Register To The Love For Life Mailing List: http://loveforlife.com.au/content/09/05/14/mailing-list

1. For The Body Of The Love For Life Work by Arthur and Fiona Cristian

Which Unravels The Reasons For The Chaos, Mayhem and Confusion Being Experienced In The World Today, Explains The Need For "Community Immunity" and Responsibility, and Focuses On The Creation Of Kindoms - Do No Harm, Life-Sustainable Communities (As The Remedy That Heals All Mans Woes) - And How We Can Co-Create Them. For Comments, Articles And Discussions, Go Here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/3385 - Also Go Here To See Podcasts And Videos Posted by Arthur & Fiona Cristian: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/7309 - The Information Shared Comes From Inspiration, Intuition, Heartfelt-Logic And Information Gathered From Nature And Many Amazing Men And Women Along The Way. It Is Not Found In Any Books Or Channellings, Or Talked About By "Experts". Go Here To Read A Brief Synopsis Of Why We Started Love For Life: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8182

2. For Information About The Ringing Cedars of Russia Series

go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/1125 and for more on Eco Homes, Villages, Organic and Permaculture Gardening and Life-Sustainability, etc, go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/3641 and here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/1985 and Mikhail Petrovich Shchetinin - Kin's School - Lycee School at Tekos: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/5173

3. For How To Eat A Raw, Living Food Diet,

go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/5068 - LIFE is information. When we distort LIFE and then eat, drink, absorb, think, feel, hear, see, touch, taste, smell and perform these distortions, the information of LIFE, your LIFE, our LIFE, our children's lives, everyone's LIFE, is distorted.

4. To Find A Menu For The Extensive Research Library (over 8,000 items posted embodying over 11,000 documents, pdf's, videos, podcasts, etc)

Which Covers Topics From Health to Chemtrails/Haarp to Brain Control to Archaeology to Astronomy Geocentricity Heliocentricity to Pandemics Bird Flu Swine Flu to Fluoride to Cancer to Free Energy to Global Warming, 9/11, Bali Bombings, Aspartame, MSG, Vaccinations, Aids/HIV, Mercury, New World Order, Satanism, Religions, Cults, Sects, Symbolism, etc, etc, go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/82

5. If You Would Like To Read About The Cristian Family NSW Supreme Court Case

(Macquarie Bank/Perpetual Limited Bank Fraud Condoned By Judges, Registrars, Barristers, Lawyers, Politicians, Public Servants, Bureaucrats, Big Business and Media Representatives - A Crime Syndicate/Terrorist Organisation) Which Prompted The Creation Of This Love For Life Website December 2006, And The Shooting And Torture Of Supporters Who Assisted Us In Reclaiming The Family Home, Joe Bryant And His Wife, Both In Their Late 70's, go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/5 And Read Some Of Our Email Correspondence With Lawyer Paul Kean - Macedone Christie Willis Solari Partners - Miranda Sydney May 17th-June 27th 2006: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/7300

6. For The Stories Of Other Victims Of The System,

go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/australian_stories (If you have a story you would like us to put up, we would love to here from you:
action @ loveforlife.com.au)

7. For Documentation Of Harm Done By The Powers-That-Be And Their Representatives,

Evidence Revealing How Victims Did Not Break The Peace, Caused No Crime or Harm, There Were No Injured Parties. Documenting Incontrovertible Evidence Demonstrating How The Powers That Be (PTB) And Their Lackeys Will Break All The Laws They Are Supposed To Uphold. They Will Kidnap, Intimidate, Terrorise, Rape, Pillage, Plunder And Lie And Take Responsibility For None Of It. All Part Of Their Tactics Of Using Fear And Trauma To Keep Us In Our Place. Relatives Of Those Under Their Radar Are Also Not Safe From Attack And Intimidation. All Starting From A $25 Fine For Not Voting And A $65 Fine For Not Changing A Dog Registration. We Do Not Have Freedom And Can Only Appear To Have Freedom If We Comply. Regardless How Small The Matter The PTB Throw Hundreds Of Thousands Of Dollars Away To Enforce Their Will.... Go Here:
Fiona Cristian Reply To State Debt Recovery Office - Part One to Part Ten - From 17th October 2008 And Still Continuing:
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6319 or
Fiona Cristian Reply To State Debt Recovery Office
Part One: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/5742 - From 17th October 2008
Part Two: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6135 - From 18th December 2008
Part Three: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6295 - From 9th January 2009
Part Four: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6296 - From 14th January 2009
Part Five: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6375 - The Sick Puppy - From 20th February 2009
Part Six: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6390 - Police Officers, Sheriff’s Officers, Tow Truck Driver and State Debt Recovery Office Blatantly Ignore the Law To Rape, Pillage and Plunder The Private Property Of Fiona Cristian - From 11th March 2009
Part Seven: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6445 - Affidavit Of Truth - Letter To The Queen + Australia: Fascism is Corporatism - From 30th March 2009
Part Eight: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6652 - The Pirates Auction And The Ghost Of VSL386 - From 4th April 2009
Part Nine: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/7073 - Arthur Cristian's Letter To Pru Goward MP - From 15th December 2009
Part Ten: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/7500 - Should We Be In Fear Of Those Who Claim To Protect Us? "Roman Cult" Canon Law - Ecclesiastical Deed Poll - The Work Of Frank O'Collins - From 13th October 2010

8. If You Are Interested In Information On Freedom From Statutes, Rule-Of-Law, Free Man/Free Woman, Strawman, "Person" and Admiralty Law (The Law Of Commerce),

go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/895 - For Common Law, Democracy, Constitution, Trial By Jury, Fee Simple, etc, go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/category/main/law-articles-documents

9. If You Are Interested In Banking and Money Created (Fiat/Credit/Debt/Mortgage/Loan/Overdraft etc) Out-Of-Thin-Air, How Banks Counterfeit Money,

go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/banks

10. For A List Of All The Latest Posts In The Love For Life Website,

go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/tracker

11. For Links To Many Hundreds Of Videos, DVDs And Podcasts

go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/video_dvd

12. To See The Cristian Family Pledge, Legal and other Disclaimers

go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/content/06/12/05/love-life-legal-disclaimer

13. To Read About How A Representative Of The NSW Jewish Board Of Deputies Had Threatened To Shut Down The Love For Life Website

go here: Part One: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6616 Part Two: THE STEVE JOHNSON REPORT AND VIDEO: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6665 and Part Three: Latest Update On James Von Brunn: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6673

Conscious Love Always
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
action @ loveforlife.com.au
www.loveforlife.com.au
0418 203204 (int: 0011 61 418 203204)
PO Box 1320 Bowral 2576 NSW Australia

Arthur Cristian

Create Your Badge

Love For Life Discussions - Why Aren't We Free? How Can We Be Free?

Promote your Page too

The Cristian Family November 2006

Love For Life Legal Disclaimer

The information contained on this world wide web site (the web site and all information herein shall be collectively referred to as "Web Site Information"), under the registered url name, loveforlife.com.au, resides on a host server environment in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15203, United States of America.

The Web Site Information has been prepared to provide general information only and is not intended to constitute or be construed as providing substantive professional advice or opinion on any facts or circumstances. Transmission of the information is not intended to create, nor does its receipt give rise to, a professional-client relationship between 'Love for Life' and the receiver.

While every care has been taken to ensure the accuracy and timeliness of the information prepared and/or reported on this site, 'Love for Life' is not responsible for any errors or omissions or for the Web Site Information not being up to date. The Web Site Information may not reflect the most current developments.

The impact of the law, policy and/or procedure for any particular situation depends on a variety of factors; therefore, readers should not act upon any Web Site Information without seeking professional advice. 'Love for Life' is not responsible for any action taken in reliance on any Web Site Information herein.

'Love for Life' is not responsible for any action you or others take which relies on information in this website and/or responses thereto. 'Love for Life' disclaim all responsibility and liability for loss or damage suffered by any person relying, directly or indirectly, on the Web Site Information, including in relation to negligence or any other default.

'Love for Life' does not warrant, represent or hold out that any Web Site Information will not cause damage, or is free from any computer virus, defect(s) or error(s). 'Love for Life' is not liable to users for any loss or damage however caused resulting from the use of material found on its web site.

'Love for Life' does not necessarily endorse or approve of any Web Site Information linked to and contained on other web sites linked herein and makes no warranties or representations regarding the merchantability or fitness for purpose, accuracy and quality, of any such information.

The sending of information by you, and the receipt of it by 'Love for Life', is not intended to, and does not, create a professional-client relationship.

All Web Site Information is considered correct at the time of the web site's most recent revision.

The Cristian Family November 2006

ADDITIONAL DISCLAIMER

THE CRISTIAN FAMILY SUPPORTS
FREEDOM OF SPEECH - FREEDOM OF THOUGHT

Note: Updated Wednesday 17th June 2009 8.00pm Sydney Time.

Love For Life does not support harm doing in any shape or form. However, we are supporters of free speech so we post articles, documentaries, etc, that represent a wide cross section of ideas. See the Love For Life extensive research library where there are over 11,000 individual documents, articles, videos, podcasts and debates/discussions are posted: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/82. We clearly see the evidence of the destruction to MAN and Earth that has been caused by ALL religions over the centuries and are therefore not supporters of religions, cults, sects or any group that demands conformity of thought, speech or action, or has rules, regulations or rituals that must be followed. Religions, nationalities and cultural "identities" are formed as a result of the brainwashing we receive from childhood. They are part of the tactics the Establishment uses to keep us all divided from one another and fighting one another.

All religions promote discrimination and division, leading to hatred and even violence and murder. None of them have yet to produce a remedy to all the suffering, poverty, unhappiness and discrimination in the world. If any religion truly had the remedy to all the suffering on earth, there would no longer be any suffering. What have Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, Judaism, atheism and the New Age done to end the suffering in the world?

Freedom Of Speech - Freedom Of Thought

Since December 2006, there have been many attempts to take down the Love For Life website. Any attempts have been thwarted by Love For Life supporters inundating the harm-doers with emails, etc, objecting to them taking down the website for a variety of reasons. The trouble makers usually back off when they realise that they can post all their views, arguments, beliefs, etc, in the Love For Life website without censorship or restriction imposed. They get to see that even the Queen, Pope, Prime Minister, President of America, etc, can post all their views without hindrance or sabotage and that we support freedom of speech/thought which means we support the right of all sides to express their views.

Of note, there is a vast amount of information posted in the Love For Life website which we do not agree with but we leave it all up because we refuse to be biased, opinionated or self-centered/self-serving. Of the many thousands of comments posted over the years we have only removed posts containing secret links to commercial advertisements, terrible foul language, threats of violence and death, etc, and attacks on other people's characters that avoid the subject/debate at hand. Besides links to advertisements, we have taken down less than six comments due to the above. We usually leave everything up, all warts and all, even those posts threatening to do terrible things to Fiona, our children, our dogs, our friends, family & supporters, etc.

The Love For Life website has information from all sides on many subjects, whether about Islam, Judaism, Christianity, Law, health, psychology, mind control, vaccination, aspartame, MSG, Chemtrails etc. There are over 11,000 individual articles, documentaries, podcasts, etc on the website and they are so diverse that we are sure that everyone would be able to find something they loved and something they hated, if they took the time to search. If we removed all the articles hated by everyone, there would probably be nothing left! We are not anti anyone but freedom of speech is freedom of speech and no one should condemn the work of another without taking the time to research the subject themselves. Yes, there are articles by those who have a less-than-rosy-viewpoint of Judaism, but there are also articles on the dark side of Tibetan Buddhism (and it is very dark) for those who are interested in the truth: Tibet - Buddhism - Dalai Lama: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6271 Should the authors of these articles be abused and imprisoned for daring to challenge the widely conceived reputation of Buddhism as being the religion of peace and love and that of the Dalai Lama as a saint, or should those interested be allowed to study the work and come to their own conclusions? The same applies to all the articles, documentaries, etc, about Christianity, Islam, Freemasonry, New World Order, etc.

The Love for Life website also shows how the Rule of Law, the Bar, the Government, the Monarchy, the system of commerce, the local, national and multi/trans-national private corporations, all the courses and careers on offer from our universities, all the educators, scientists, academics and experts, the aristocrats and the Establishment bloodlines have also done NOTHING to end the suffering in the world. The website maps the insanity of a world where there is no help for those in need, just as there was no help available for us when we were victims of terrible bank fraud: http://loveforlife.com.au/court_case orchestrated, condoned and protected by an international crime syndicate/terrorist organisation of judges, barristers, registrars, lawyers, politicians, banksters, big business representatives, media moguls and other lackeys who, all together, put up a wall of silence despite our trying many, many avenues. After the family home was stolen and business destroyed we were left close to poverty and destitution caring for 4 young daughters. Three years later not much has changed regardless of all our efforts. Where were all the followers of all the religions to help us? Or do we have to be members of those religions to receive help from others involved in them?

We have been accused of being anti - Jewish because we had posted an excerpt from James von Brun's book: Kill the Best Gentiles! http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6054 in which he blames Jews for the problems of the world. Obviously this is not our view because of what we have stated above. We do not hate anyone, whatever religion they follow. We are always open to talk to any religious leader or politician and meet with any judge, member of the Bar, experts, academics, educators etc to share the remedy we offer that heals all the divisions between MAN and MAN, and MAN and EARTH.

Today, a representative of the New South Wales Jewish Board of Deputies is threatening to close the website down, because they have decided it is anti - Jewish and that we promote racism. What has the New South Wales Jewish Board of Deputies done to end the suffering in the world? Can they show that they are concerned with the suffering of ALL men, women and children AND ARE SEEN TO BE DOING SOMETHING ABOUT IT or are they only concerned with Jewish affairs? If so, they, along with all the other religions that only care for their own, are part of the problem, not part of the solution. The man who rang Arthur today was only concerned with Jewish affairs; he was not interested in our intentions or in anybody else, just as most Christians, Muslims, Sikhs, Catholics, etc, are only interested in their own. While we separate our lives into groups, dividing our lives from others with rules, regulations, rituals, procedures, conditions and contracts, we will never solve our problems.

No matter what we in the Western World Civilisation of Commerce have been promised by our politicians, religious leaders, scientists, educators, philosophers, etc, for the past two hundred years, all we have seen is ever-increasing destruction of men, women and children and Earth. None of the so-called experts and leaders we have been taught to rely on are coming up with a solution and none of them are taking full-responsibility for the fact that they can't handle the problem. All religious books talk about end times full of destruction and suffering but why do we have to follow this program when there is an alternative to hatred, mayhem and death? Why are our leaders following the program of destruction and death rather than exploring the do no harm alternatives? It seems that any mainstream politician, priest or academic are only interested in supporting the RULES OF THE DIVIDE, that maintain the haves and the have nots. For 200+ years, 99% of the world population have been so trained to pass on their responsibility for their lives, others and Earth, that the 1% of the population that make up the leaders of the rest of us are making all the decisions leading to the destruction of all of us and Earth. Let's not forget the education system that brainwashes the 99% of the population that we are free and have equal rights while, in fact, we are feathering the nests of those at the top.

At the root of all our problems is self-centredness, an unwillingness nurtured by the Establishment that keeps us concerned only with our own needs rather than the needs of others around us and Earth. Instead of creating and releasing acts of love for those around us as gifts to benefit them and Earth, we take, take and take, until there is nothing left. The whole point of the Love for Life website is to show people the root of all our problems and to share the remedy. The extensive research library is there to attract browsers and to provide access to information not available through mainstream channels. If the New South Wales Jewish Board of Deputies can, after careful examination of our work, prove that anything we are saying is wrong, we will be happy to accept their proof. If they cannot, and they are still insistent on closing the website down, they will be showing themselves to be traitors to MAN because they are not interested in pursuing any avenue that can end the suffering in the world.

All religions, corporations and organisations that support and maintain the Western World Civilisation of Commerce are part of the problem because our civilisation is a world of haves and have nots, exclusivity, privilege, racism, violence, hatred, poverty, sickness, discrimination, abuse, starvation, homelessness, corruption, collusion, vindictiveness, social unrest, arrogance, ignorance, fear, war and chaos. While we support civilisation, we support death and destruction.

If we truly want peace and freedom for all, we have to let go of all that which keeps us divided, and come together as MAN, conscious living co-creators of creation/life. The Love For Life website offers a remedy to the problems we all face in the form of DO NO HARM COMMUNITIES (KINDOMS): http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6608 - http://loveforlife.com.au/node/3641 For more details see here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6511 and here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/3385 - We also highly recommend that everyone read the brilliant Russian books called The Ringing Cedars: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/1125 - The Love For Life homepage/front-page also provides lots of inspiring remedy based information: http://loveforlife.com.au - If you want to be kept up to date with our work please register to the Love For Life mailing list here: http://loveforlife.com.au/campaign_list We usually send two postings per month. Presently (September 2011) there are over 7000 registrations reaching over 500,000 readers across Earth. The website now (September 2011) receives up to 12 million hits per month. Since December 2006, over 100 million people have visited the Love For Life website.

Conscious Love Always
Arthur and Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
17th June 2009

The Cristian Family November 2006

Clarification Regarding Our Intentions
Behind The Use Of Donations

The Love For Life website is offered for free without a fee and without any conditions attached. If people are inspired to donate money, then we accept their gift and have provided an avenue for them to support the work we do through Fiona's Paypal or ANZ bank account http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8515. There is no obligation whatsoever to donate and all are equally welcome to our work and to our "time", whether they donate or not. Over the last 9 years, all the Love For Life work has been put out for free and it has often been donations from supporters that have enabled us to renew the domain name, etc, to keep the website going. While some complain that we have an avenue for donations, others complained when we didn't! Either use it or don't - the choice is yours.

Since Love For Life started March 2005 and website December 2006, Arthur has worked 16 hours a day, 7 days a week unpaid for much of this period, putting together the website and sharing insights to wake people up to what has been done to them, whether through the 11,500+ individual articles, videos, podcasts, debates, discussions, pdf's, research documents, etc, found amongst the 8,500+ posts, as well as helping many, many men and women over the phone, and through email, website correspondence, Facebook and YouTube, and creating the Love For Life food forest vege garden and Love For Life music recording studio. This is our life is a gift commitment to serve MAN/Nature/Earth but we are still severely compromised by "The System" and still have to give to Caesar what is claimed to belong to Caesar, which is where the donations help us.

Fiona & Arthur Cristian
Love For Life
21st July 2014