Love for Life

Moving-Earth DECEPTION!! - The Earth is NOT Moving!!

[Note: Please use above link to site numerous links embedded in this document including photos, diagrams and graphics. A reduced/edited version has been provided below and the larger original document is located further down on this page but is messy.]

-------------------------------

Moving-Earth DECEPTION!!
By Bernard Brauer

Question: Why is it ( the stationary Earth truth ) important?

Answer: A stationary Earth = automatically means that stars orbit Earth once each Sidereal Day ( 23hrs 56min 4sec )

= no 14 billion light year radius of universe

= no 14 billion year age of universe

= destroys time needed for EVOLUTION MYTH

= entire world's "knowledge" based on "science falsely so called" is exposed as a colossal DECEPTION

= restores Bible credibility

= widespread efforts to follow Bible's rules including belief in afterlife with system of magnified rewards and punishments

= existing "crime" ( sin ) rate collapses. WAKE-UP ICR ( Institute for Creation Research ) and AiG ( Answers in Genesis )!!! More HERE.

If the Earth were going around the Sun, then the speed of the satellite would have to adjust due to the different gravitational pull of the Earth. When the satellite is behind the Earth it would have to "chase" the Earth. When in front of Earth, the Earth would chase the satellite. Since the Earth is supposedly going around the Sun with the speed of 107,534 km/hr, the speed of the satellite would have to DRASTICALLY change to account for the change of the gravity pull.

If the universe revolves around the Earth, Earth's gravitational pull on the satellite would be the same regardless of its position on the orbit. Furthermore, the Sun and Moon's gravities acting on Earth would balance. The Sun is bigger but farther. The Moon is smaller but closer.

1. The Earth doesn't have centrifugal force. Gravity is the same all over the Earth because the Earth doesn't move. If it did, the centrifugal force would make objects weigh TWICE less on Equator than for example in Vancouver, Canada.

2. Doing the same experiment with a SOUND WAVE fortunately can check this. Doppler's effect would apply.

3. Michelson-Morley experiment doesn't indicate that the light travels with the same speed independent of Earth's motion. It indicates that the Earth is stationary.

4. Microwave radiation is 2.7 all over the Earth because the Earth doesn't move.

5. Weight of objects would be affected depending on which side of the Earth they would be. The "density distribution" theory wouldn't help, because it would have to change non-stop as the Earth rotates. If the weight of objects is not changing with the location on Earth, then the centrifugal force couldn't possibly make the Earth bulge at the equator. That proves Newton wrong.

6. The Earth doesn't have its "density" distributed so exactly as to ideally match the centrifugal force. Such argument is self-serving, arbitrary and logically invalid because there is no evidence to measure it and therefore to support it.
( Note Earth's "density" for which there is no evidence other than that it "has to be this way" ).

7. The shapes of "constellations" don't change over thousands of years.

8. Earth is the only planet with millions of life forms. The Bible mentions only life on Earth.

9. Only humans are capable of having a "point of view", therefore it's OUR point of view that matters as CENTRAL.

10. Copernicus didn't provide evidence to support his theory.

11. Contrary to Copernicus, it's not mathematically possible to "calculate" if the Earth is revolving around the Sun.

12. Newton's thought experiment with a bucket of water, indicates that the Earth is not revolving. ( The water should sway if the Earth was revolving ). That's a classic example of lack of centrifugal force of supposedly rotating Earth.
Now we know that the Earth is not flattened on the top and bottom. If that was true, objects would weigh differently.

13. On time-delayed pictures of stars, the Polaris star almost doesn't move. The only way it can work is if both the Earth and Polaris don't move. The Earth is therefore the centre of the universe and Polaris is its end.

14. The circular movement of stars on time-delayed pictures cannot be created by Earth's rotation. If the Earth revolved the paths of stars would be horizontal not circular.

15. Satellites go around the Earth because the space around revolves, thus acting on satellites. You can even put a can of Coca Cola and make it a satellite.

16. The constellations don't change, year after year.

17. Heavenly bodies don't collapse together, because their attraction is perfectly balanced by equal centrifugal force resulting from revolving around the Earth.

18. The universe is found to expand AWAY from the Earth with EQUAL speed, that means that the Universe STARTED from the Earth.

19. God started to create the Universe from the Earth, why would a Perfect Being put it later somewhere else? Wouldn't he put it where it was supposed to be right away? He is perfect so why would He NOT start from the CENTER, as the center is perfectly balanced and therefore requires less effort to start there. By the way, did I mention that the Bible says that God created the sphere of the Earth and hang it on nothing? That was when no human could imagine the Earth hanging on nothing.

The Bible also says that the Earth is MOTIONLESS. Since rotation is "motion" and there is no motion, hence the Earth doesn't rotate.

The Earth's horizontal rotation would create horizontal paths of stars. ( Pic.4 )
However, what we see is this. ( Pic.5 )

Polaris Effect: On several time-delayed pictures there are shown circulating stars. Supposedly, because of the Earth's movement around its own axis. However, their circulation is in the wrong direction…

If the Earth is moving around, then the stars should "move" horizontally, with slight bent upwards on northern hemisphere and a slight bent downwards on southern hemisphere. That's because the Earth is a sphere. The stars should appear to move in the opposite direction to Earth's movement.

In fact, the stars are moving in a circle, around the star Polaris. Hence, "Polaris Effect". The stars on the outside of Polaris move faster. It is because the distance they travelled is bigger. They also move in unison, which proves that they are somehow connected.

To make it even more puzzling, the time interval of the film exposure does not match the part of the circle that the star would travel in that part of day. I mean if the time exposure is 4 hours, then if 24 hours is full circle then 4 hours should be one sixth of the full circle. However, it's only about 1/12. The direction of stars' rotation seems to be the same as Earth's… If Earth is turning from left to right, then the stars should appear to turn from right to left! If the stars move from left to right, then Earth may be stationary. The Polaris star is always stationary. The only way a point can remain stationary, is when both the observer and the point are stationary, or both move in unison. Since the other stars move in unison relative to the Earth, then both Polaris and Earth must be motionless!

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Moving-Earth DECEPTION!!
By Bernard Brauer

FAKE "Virtual Reality" UNIVERSE, fabricated by Satanic-zionists* EXPOSED!!

* Evil, Anti-Christitic Club/Crime-Scheme/Secret-Society that has a Diabolical Plan for World Ownership, Control and Domination ).

There is Something about Space that THEY Don't Want You to KNOW . . .

The Earth is NOT Moving!!

It is a Cosmic Fight to the Death between two RELIGIOUS Creation Scenarios:

Lie of Creation by Satan's Evolution vs. Truth of Creation by God's Word.

Also a battle for Zionism ( World Rule )...

Satan's-zionism ( centralized State slavery/poverty ) vs. God's-zionism ( decentralized Family liberty/wealth ).

Scroll Down...... ***** Last updated: November 16, AD 2008 ****** Translate HERE

True, NON-HYPOTHETICAL Science ( observational data, our senses, physical experiments, and logic )

CONTRADICTS the assertions of Mainstream Science's existing DECEITFUL, FRAUD-RIDDEN, Unscientific,

State-funded Model of the Universe derived from the Mystical Zohar/Kabbala of the Pharisee RELIGION.

Moreover, the Intelligible Christian Bible's Voluntarily-funded Geocentric/Geostatic Model of the Universe

Proclaims: The Sun's Path Orbits the Earth Daily and The Earth is NOT Moving.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mainstream Science Lies:

- Current Threat Level is High ( Orange ).

- The Threat Level in the Space "Exploration" Sector is High ( Orange ).

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Question: Why is it ( the stationary Earth truth ) important? Answer: A stationary Earth = automatically means that stars orbit Earth once each Sidereal Day ( 23hrs 56min 4sec ) = no 14 billion light year radius of universe = no 14 billion year age of universe = destroys time needed for EVOLUTION MYTH = entire world's "knowledge" based on "science falsely so called" is exposed as a colossal DECEPTION = restores Bible credibility = widespread efforts to follow Bible's rules including belief in afterlife with system of magnified rewards and punishments = existing "crime" ( sin ) rate collapses. WAKE-UP ICR ( Institute for Creation Research ) and AiG ( Answers in Genesis )!!! More HERE.

"The Rotating/Orbiting Earth Model is very widely accepted but that is no real proof that it is true ( 'argumentum ad populum' in Latin or 'the bandwagon effect' in Modern English )."

"Science information and news used to be spoon-fed to you over the TV, radio, and newspapers, but now the internet exposes those channels as deceptive. The window of truthful Science News, which helps form the American psyche, set ideas in motion and advance industry, is TEMPORARILY open."

"Everyone interested in distinguishing Truth from Deception--scientific or otherwise--needs to understand the kind of programming that has gone into computerized telescopes and cameras to get them to send back Virtual Reality Images ( not 'real' by definition ) which are being used to indoctrinate the world with spurious information about the makeup, size and age of the universe."

"The Universe is not impersonal. It was not created by a random, meaningless evolutionary process. It reflects the loving personality of God, because every molecule was created by God, has a place in the plan of God, and is upheld by God."

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

*Left image (below): Earth is stationary due to perfectly balanced Interactive Electromagnetic Forces ( "EM is 10 to the 39th power stronger than gravity. How can a weak force like gravity dominate in a universe that crackles and hums with electricity?" ).

*Right image (below): The sun's path, fixed within the rotating firmament, spiral-orbits the Earth north-south and clockwise from the Tropic of Cancer to the Tropic of Capricorn in six months and then alters course laterally to spiral-orbit south-north but continues clockwise for the next six months. Seasons result from the yearly helical oscillation of the sun's path around the untilted stationary Earth.

Geocentrism ( also called Geostatic = stationary Earth, moving sun ) is the Most Exciting, the Fastest Growing and Most Significant Truth Movement on the Internet!

The Geocentric Cosmogony will Thrive Because it is True. It's Adherents are Multiplying, and are the Most Intelligent of Men and Women!

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sun's Path Diagram ( simple ) - Created by Allen Daves:

NEP = North Ecliptic Pole, SEP = South Ecliptic Pole, NCP = North Celestial Pole, SCP = South Celestial Pole

HC = Heliocentrism, GC = Geocentrism/Geostatic, AC = Acentric

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Moon's Path Diagram ( simple ) - Created by Allen Daves:

"More complex" diagrams are below, scroll down.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Start of preface:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

One's Belief about the Origin and Structure of the Universe is

the Foundation for All of One's Knowledge!

"Since a stationary Earth is THE foundational creation fact in the Bible, it is also the taproot of Bible credibility! Along with the creation of all biological life and mankind which followed, God's creation of an immovable, stationary Earth constitutes the basis - the taproot - for His "tree of knowledge" with its trunk ( the creation of mankind ) and all its limbs and branches. Satan knows that if he can kill this taproot - this foundational knowledge - with pseudo-science this would cause the whole "tree of knowledge" to wither and die in time. That's why he started there first!" Marshall Hall

The factless theory of heliocentricity ( stationary sun, moving Earth ) is the Foundation, the Kingpin and the most Satanically Venerated of all False-Science Government Funding Scams!

"Discarding Newton's seemingly innocuous inverse-square formula for gravity would have enormous consequences for the entire Earth, because with it goes the 'Big Bang' absurdity and the whole of secular cosmology ( which the idea of organic evolution requires in order to sanctify the notion that anything is possible given enough time ). With no publicly-perceived scientific credibility to bolster it anymore, the prevailing Western religion of naturalistic atheistic humanism must then likewise collapse."

Neville T. Jones, PhD

"If you write outside the reigning paradigm you will not get published, you will have to do it yourself. That requires a large degree of effort and dedication. You will also have to brace yourself for derision and ridicule. People will attempt to 'teach' you what you yourself are qualified to teach their teachers."

Neville T. Jones, PhD

Question: "Do you think Government funding for the Astronomical Sciences should be increased?"
Answer: "I am an amateur cosmologist but I think it would be wrong for The State
( "The Government" ) to confiscate your property and give it to me. Nothing in the Constitution gives the Federal Government authority to take MONEY from Farmer Jones and give it to Space Scientist Smith."

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Index *** Moving-Earth DECEPTION! *** Click on topic:
LATEST, Allen Daves, Marshall Hall, Q&A, Quotes, Two, Three, Foucault Pendulum, Gravity, Satellite, Relativity,

Rotation, Sun's Orbit, State Scientism, Translation Movement, Critics, WBTG, Books-etc. ]

( Negative Parallax, Airy's Experiment, Restoring Forces, Schroter's Effect } by Neville Jones HERE.

( Amazing and unique to Geocentrism is Flower Pattern of Mars, Jupiter and Saturn } by Steven Jones HERE.
Electric Universe, Geobounded Universe, No Flat Earth, Mars Lie, Moon Lie, Money Lie.
AntiChurch/ProGod/ProBible page HERE.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Proof of Geocentric Correctness and Heliocentric Incorrectness:

Meaning of words used in this webpage compilation/portal:

In Classical Greek language, Geo means Earth and Helio means sun.

Geocentrism ( GC, also called Geostatic ) = nonrotating Earth, Spherical Earth, nonorbiting Earth, no "axial tilt" of Earth, sun spiral-orbits Earth; stars orbit Earth nightly. Universe has Earth as center, is small ( as low as 500,000 mile radius ), young and created by God. Derived from Bible Christianity. Studies and experiments mostly voluntarily financed by Family paycheck
( "human creationism" ), creating good "karma" or Spiritual Blessings, resulting in Research and Education Truths.

Heliocentrism ( HC ) =rotating Earth, Spherical Earth, orbiting Earth, Earth has "axial tilt", Earth orbits sun yearly; stars stationary to Earth. Universe is acentric ( AC = no center ), large, old and was created by itself ( LOL!!! ). Derived from Kabbala Pharisaism. Studies and experiments mostly coercively financed by State taxpayer ( "human destructionism" or "theftism" because all State taxation is theft ), creating bad "karma" or Spiritual Curses, resulting in Research and Education Lies.

Geocentrism is scientific, logical and true. Heliocentrism is unscientific, illogical and false.

Planet means "wanderer" . . . The Earth is NOT a planet.

See also these other excellent, original and scholarly websites about Geocentrism ( but each not related and completely independent from the others, and not in total agreement in all aspects or interpretations of Geocentrism or Bible doctrines and themes ):

1. Marshall Hall's www.fixedearth.com ( book order HERE )

2. Neville Jones, PhD and son Steven's www.realityreviewed.com ( DIGITAL DOWNLOAD /cd-rom order HERE )

3. Robert Sungenis and Robert Bennett's "Galileo Was Wrong" ( book/cd-rom order HERE )

4. Gerardus D. Bouw's www.geocentricity.com ( Free PDF book HERE )

5. Niall Kilkenny's reformation website HERE

6. Malcolm Bowden at stationaryearth.org [ click "add-on" at top of page to run video ]; ( book order HERE )

7. Philip Stott's Geocentrism website HERE

8. Pawel Kolasa's Wiser TV, Video: Earth is Motionless - Part one HERE, Part two HERE

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
End of preface.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Earth is NOT Moving!!

Facts: ( by Marshall Hall ):

- There is NO proof that the Earth rotates on an "axis" daily and orbits the sun annually. None.

- All calculations for eclipses, the space program, navigation, satellite movements - anything that demands precision and accuracy - are based on a non-moving Earth. Boiled down, heliocentric math is the same as Geocentric [ also called Geostatic ] math.

- NO EXPERIMENT HAS SHOWN THE EARTH TO BE MOVING ( much less at 30 times rifle bullet speed in solar orbit and at 250 times RBS around a galaxy. One would think such speeds would flap one's collar a little even if the "science" establishment says no! )

- Multiple experiments have shown the Earth to be stationary.

- Revisionist history reveals the roles that Copernicus, Kepler, Galileo, Newton, Einstein, Sagan et al have played in foisting this LIE on mankind.

- The logic against a moving Earth is overpowering.

- WORLD-CLASS astronomer Sir Fred Hoyle said take your pick between the two models.

- Copernicanism paved the way for Darwinism ( which then spawned Marxism, Freudism, Einsteinism and Saganism. )

- Star speeds are not a problem when the thickness of the universe is seen to be what it really is, that is, LESS than half a light day thick ( 8 billion mile radius ).

- NASA's space program is labelled "Origins Research" and costs taxpayers mega-bucks. Computerized telescopes are programmed to send back "synthesized images". The "image warper" permits "geometric transformations" while "origins technology... configures the multiple small mirrors..." in these telescopes. Talk about a con job!

- The Bible says [ 67 Scriptural references HERE ] The Earth is NOT Moving and cannot be moved. What'll it be folks? False science as the source of absolute truth... or God's Word?

Book Order HERE

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IT SUNBELIEVABLE !

"The Geocentric ( Geostatic ) model has challenged and defeated the heliocentric model as being the best description of the cosmological environment in which we live."

Sunrise and Sunset Calendars: HERE.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Question:
"Does it really matter to us whether or not we rotate and orbit or just stand still?

Answer:
Yes, it matters a great deal because proving a non-moving, non-rotating Earth
to the satisfaction of the masses, would give the Bible a great degree
of credibility. People would think: "Against all odds they were right, the Bible
must be the Truth, the inspired, infallible Word of God." Then they would investigate the Bible
and discover other truths . . . like a Judgment Day to account for their behavior during
their time on Earth. After physical death souls are judged by their thoughts, words and deeds
and the intentions and motivations behind their thoughts words and deeds. Great rewards and severe
punishments are given ( a hundred, sixty or thirty times what was sown ). If people believed this there would be little crime or war in the world. No financial fraud or reneging on business agreements, no 55% State taxation, no fractional-reserve fake money, no fake Apollo moon landing, no fake Phoenix Mars Mission, no fake Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter Mission, no self-inflicted 911 False Flag ops, no dead six million plus German Christians, no dead 500,000+ Iraqi kids, no Ali Abbas with his arms blown off.

Secondly, in order for the Earth to be stationary the stars have to be able to
go around nightly, so that eliminates Mainstream Science's 78 billion light-year radius*
of the universe and then that destroys the 14 billion years age of the universe built upon that radius,
which knocks out the time prop needed for the evolution of the universe, Earth, and mankind.
Belief in human evolutionism indirectly causes "immoral" ( unLawful and Criminal ) behavior.
When people realize their fellow man must have been created and has not evolved
from bacteria or animals then, again, they would have greater respect and awe
for other created humans and not bomb them or do evil to them. In fact if there are
great rewards they might be more inclined to help and to do good to others.

*"It [ 78 billion light-year radius ] is just wise guy scientists extrapolating all over the place using pure assumptions to make a name for themselves. The Kabbalist Universe is the settled paradigm of 15/15 +or- for radius and light years. Skimming through this piece, it looks like the premise is wrong anyway, namely, that the mythical identifying of galaxies 14 billion light years distant and then using that to multiply by the speed of light. This says that the so called expansion factor has been at light year speed ( c. 6 trillion miles in a year ) constantly for 15 billion normal years. There is something wrong with this. ( There was a Russian some years ago who settled on a 56 billion mile radius. But I think the Pharisees are happy with the 15/15 formula which dates at least from the 1st century Kabbalist HaKanna. A lifetime or two here doesn't affect that formula )." Marshall Hall

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Romans Chapter 1 verses 18-22

"For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteoousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness; Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them. For the invisible things of him from the creation of the World are clearly seen, being understood by THE THINGS THAT ARE MADE
[ Earth, moon, sun, stars ], even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse: Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened. Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools . . . "
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"There can be no evolution theory of the universe, Earth, and mankind without acceptance of BILLIONS OF YEARS." Marshall Hall

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Psalm 19

"Psalm 19 gives us an awesome look at the transforming power of God and his word. Verses 1-6 declare the glory of God’s creation and the fact the heavens and skies are enduring evidence of God’s existence and creative power."

1 The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handywork.

2 Day unto day uttereth speech, and night unto night sheweth knowledge.

3 There is no speech nor language, where their voice is not heard.

4 Their line is gone out through all the earth, and their words to the end of the world. In them hath he set a tabernacle for the sun,

5 Which is as a bridegroom coming out of his chamber, and rejoiceth as a strong man to run a race.

6 His going forth is from the end of the heaven, and his circuit unto the ends of it: and there is nothing hid from the heat thereof."

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Introduction to Geocentrism - by Neville T. Jones, PhD

Geocentric means World-centred. In particular, a geocentric universe is one in which the centres of the World and of the ( finite ) universe coincide. Observational data, together with our instincts or senses, indicate to us that the universe is in reality geocentric. In addition, all physical experiments designed to demonstrate some alleged motion of the World have consistently produced a null result. Only theoretical ideas support a different interpretation of our surroundings than this. Cosmology is the area of physics which deals with the workings and structure of the universe as a whole. Ancient cosmologies were invariably geocentric, the main four of which being those due to Apollonius of Perga ( c.262 - c.190 BC ), Hipparchus of Nicaea ( c.190 - c.125 BC ), Claudius Ptolemy ( Latinized form of Klaudios Ptolemaios, c.90 - c.168 ) and Tyge ( Latinized as Tycho ) Brahe ( 1546-1601 ). These are often dismissed as unsound or clumsy, and certainly the deferents, epicycles and equant constructions of the Ptolemaic model, for example, cannot be defended from physical foundations. The situation with modern ideas, however, is no better in either respect, meaning that the fundamental workings of the heavens are just as relevant to us as ever they were in the past.
We feel no motion of the World on which we all live. Furthermore, no experiment in all physics has ever demonstrated that the World moves around the Sun, or that it rotates on an axis. From the standpoint of our senses, therefore, it seems simply common sense to attribute the motion of the Sun, Moon, planets and stars to those objects themselves, rather than to some multi-component, contorted movement of the World. Certainly, to a good approximation, the stars appear to go around us as if they are each attached to the inner surface of a huge celestial sphere, which is itself rotating above our heads from east to west on a celestial north-south polar axis.

Figure 1: The celestial sphere.

In some geocentric models of the universe, the Sun goes around the World
every day, following a path in the sky called the ecliptic. The seasons are simply explained by the Sun traversing the ecliptic over a period of twelve months, such that the declination of the Sun ( effectively a measure of its height above the celestial equator ) will vary slightly from one day to the next. Contemplation of Fig. 1 will illustrate the mechanism by which the Sun reaches its highest position in the sky on the summer solstice, its lowest position on the winter
solstice and that it crosses the equator at the points referred to as the vernal and autumnal equinoxes.
We are currently taught the notion that everything around us sprang into existence, of its own accord, between twelve and twenty billion years ago via an explosion of everything out of nothing. However, the considered opinion of the primary authors of this website is that such a proposal is an untenable fairy-tale ( Digital Download/CD-ROM order HERE ).

Complete paper here: http://www.realityreviewed.com/Geocentrism.htm
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Why are so many scientists LYING to us? They LIE about 911, they LIE about the Earth's supposed rotation, they LIE about Global Warming and they LIE about the Apollo Moon landing. A list of what they're HONEST about would be shorter! Is every scientist nothing more than an educated ape?"

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"One does not stand a chance in a Western scientific institute unless one tows the party line. Even really great scientists and engineers have been thrown out when they start thinking for themselves ( e.g. the late Professor Eric Laithwaite, the greatest electrical engineer of the 20th century, in my opinion, thrown out of Imperial College, London, when he performed 'badly' at a Royal Society lecture - see HERE. Funding just dries up and one becomes 'an embarrassment' to the institute. Thus is the Western educational establishment well stitched up . . ." Neville Jones
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

New - July 15, AD 2008

Heliocentric Problem Number Five - Schroter's Effect HERE
Excerpt:
"The heliocentric idea was known of in at least the third century B.C., but was rightly dismissed as being insane. The publication of a multi-volume book, in 1543, by a Sun-worshipping astrologer who knew nothing about physics, then sowed the seed of the present-day misconception that we are taught as being 'fact'. One after another, physicists placed meat on Kopernik's bare bones, with many contorted and ad hoc components
of motion." Neville Jones
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mars-Landing DECEPTION!! - They are really in Australia HERE.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"The Copernican [ heliocentricity ] heresy so thoroughly reversed man's view of the cosmos, the social order and hierarchy of moral values, that it was as if a new species of being had arisen; no doctrine has had a more pernicious influence on the human spirit. The English, French and American revolutions stemmed from it, and it paved the way for Darwinism, Marxism, Nietzsche, atheistic existentialism and Einstein. But worse, it has led to the modern doctrine of MORAL relativism, that there are no moral absolutes, which results in anarchism, hedonism and despair; also meaningless, mechanistic impersonal materialism. 'Surely our fathers have inherited nothing but lies' ( Jeremiah 7 )". Amnon Goldberg
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Conspiracy Theory?

* Do NOT believe in or follow crackpot/wacko Conspiracy Theories ( like for example heliocentricity, viz, a rotating and sun-orbiting Earth ).
A conspiracy theory alleges that a coordinated group such as tax-funded "scientists" are and/or were secretly working together to commit illegal or wrongful actions including hiding the existence of the group itself and its activities. In notable cases their hypothesis, like for example a self-rotating and sun-orbiting Earth, contradicts what was or is represented as the mainstream explanation for historical or current events. For most of history Geocentrism ( stationary Earth ) was the prevailing mainstream cosmological worldview, and ALWAYS WAS AND STILL IS the correct worldview. The phrase "conspiracy theory" is also used dismissively to label claims or hypothetical speculations, like a self-rotating and sun-orbiting Earth -- that are alleged by experts in Geocentrism to be untrue, misconceived, paranoid, unfounded, outlandish, irrational or otherwise -- as unworthy to be considered as real science or credible based on logic, observation and experiment.

* "Data evaluation must be based on LOE ( logic, observation and experiment ) . . . not mere assertions, assumptions and blind faith in Einstein's "beautiful equations" . . . just because it may be "beautiful" does not mean it exists external of someone's imagination... ( any more than the "universe" of a Pixar or Disney animated film does, they conform to the mathematics of their universe too! )" Allen Daves

* Ignorant folk think that such minority opinions as Geocentrism are the "conspiracy theories" . . . There is a real conspiracy for sure but the sad thing is it is mostly a "conspiracy of willful and apathetic ignorance" ( for numerous reasons). The very people who would call Geocentrists "quack conspiracy theorists" are either themselves completely ignorant of even modern cosmological axioms and principles of gravitation and mechanics or they are just "playing stupid", hoping that no one will notice or call their bluff.
Most of those who pretend to be intelligent and/or knowlegeable about physics are just plain stupid, and a few are just ignorant but once you show them, if they are honest and will continue the dialogue, they say something to the effect of, "Wow! I even got a PhD in physics X number of years ago and even taught it for X number of years... I did not think about it that way... but you can't ignore those facts". You can go to any mental hospital and the population of wackos and inmates will outnumber the doctors and the sane folk, and moreover call them crazies. What’s even more hilarious is the fact that even folk like Steven Hawking and a few intellectually honest physicists and cosmologists who would read what we are saying and are capable of understanding it, know that what we have been saying is absolutely true ( it is a philosophical not a logic and observational choice ). Not only do they admit that but even "snicker" about it to each other...LOL... but they won't dare to address that too openly with the dumb, ignorant masses... best not to confuse the common folk with unnecessary information and facts. Even more sad are all the others out there who don’t have a clue what I’m saying here and shake their heads thinking they know something about physics that tells them that the Earth moves. If only they studied the text books and peer reviewed papers a little closer, they would realize just how absolutely ignorant with a capital "I" that argument really is. Allen Daves

* Most of the scientists who resist Geocentrism certainly could be ( and are, I believe ) simply duped by unceasing and increasingly sophisticated indoctrination to the point that they are basically "programmed" to believe the heliocentricity world view. This doesn't mean that 80% of them won't resist like hell when God forces the truth on them and the world, but that is another story. It's the 20% or whatever that God can use and we can possibly help turn around. Marshall Hall
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"I firmly believe that the American and Russian space program secrets are twofold, one is that the Earth is definitely stationary and the other is

… space travel is bogus and is impossible beyond the Van Allen radiation belts … nothing of human origin has passed that gate, so the prince of all lies is forced to create an entire imaginary universe and solar system based solely on images from land-based astronomical observatories! After all, we must accept that the "prince of the power of the air" has dominion here for a small time? Therefore I bow to every image coming from NASA as being "suspect" in its truthfulness." ...... "Lots of people think Area 51 was created for the development of the U-2 [military spy plane] and stuff like the SR-71 [sometimes called the "Blackbird"], but it was really created to produce a fake universe and world for the USGS [United States Geological Survey] and mapping facilities all over the world." ...... "Every image it's ( the Hubble Space Telescope ) sent back has been nothing but rubbish, faked and spouting the futile doctrine of a universe in chaos ... which we know not to be the case!"

"To make interstellar travel believable NASA was created. The Apollo Space Program foisted the idea that man could travel to, and walk upon, the moon. Every Apollo mission was carefully rehearsed and then filmed in large sound stages at the Atomic Energy Commissions Top Secret test site in the Nevada Desert and in a secured and guarded sound stage at the Walt Disney Studios within which was a huge scale mock-up of the moon.
No man has ever ascended higher than 300 miles, if that high, above the Earth's surface. No man has ever orbited, landed on, or walked upon the moon ...
The tremendous radiation encountered in the Van Allen Belt, solar radiation, cosmic radiation, temperature control, and many other problems connected with space travel prevent living organisms leaving our atmosphere with our known level of technology. Any intelligent high school student with a basic physics book can prove NASA faked the Apollo moon landings. If you doubt this please explain how the astronauts walked upon the moons surface enclosed in a space suit in full sunlight absorbing a minimum of 265 degrees of heat surrounded by a vacuum. NASA tells us the moon has no atmosphere and that the astronauts were surrounded by the vacuum of space." more HERE

The groundwork is being laid . . . by NASA/Barry Goldstein et al and by Hollywood/Steven Spielberg et al and by Zionist PSY-OP agencies of "crop circle" builders and UFO Shysters like Steven Greer . . . for a future Orson Welles 1938-type "War of the Worlds" FAKED/STAGED alien attack and/or FAKED/STAGED messiah advent-coming......to rule the world ( special note: space aliens or ETs are fictional characters only and do NOT exist except in some people's imaginations ).

Quote: "...... do everything you can to bring Mossiach ( The Jewish Messiah )!" Rebbe Manachem Mendel
Schneerson - the seventh and last spiritual leader of the Chabad-Lubavitch movement ... some Chabad
Hasidim believe that he will return as the Messiah.

"The first and most primary problem for a Christian in the 'alien messages', is that the 'Extraterrestrials' have carefully but certainly usurped the role of God. They appear as transcendent beings that are superior to man. They know what we don't know, see what we don't see, and can solve what we can't solve. Second, they usurp
the role of God as Creator. God is not our Father, the 'Extraterrestrials' are. Third, if they are our creators, then we must owe something to them. How about our souls, our hearts, and our allegiance? Fourth, when the 'alien messages' are all put together, we find that their combined effect is the creation of a new religion. Themes of transcendence, supernatural entities, spiritual evolution, and our 'seeded' origins all combine to form a new, religious outlook on life." Patty Tunnicliffe

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Four Minute Music Break: HERE
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Statement: "It's just a bunch of Christian Propaganda"; "I'm not religious, I'm an atheist, I just believe in science".
Answer: EVERYONE has a God/god/g'd ;
• themselves ( humanism ),
• impersonal evolutionary forces ( scientism ),
• The State,
• Satan,
• Oprah ( occultism )
or
• The Creator God of the Christian Holy Bible.

EVERYONE is religious - a religion is a set of beliefs about
• morals
• the origin of the universe.

The RELIGIONS of Naturalistic Atheistic Humanism, Organic Evolutionism, Satanism, Guruism, and ESPECIALLY Statism ( "Governmentism" ) have caused more deaths than anything else. True unhijacked-by-the-state Bible Christianity has not caused a single war
death - EVER!

Christian Truths counteract PROPAGANDA ( like heliocentricity ) from those latter six RELIGIONS, among others, that many people ( who incorrectly say they are not religious ) now follow. Anti-church, pro-God, pro-Bible page HERE.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Theoretical Science EXPOSED as RELIGIOUS and NOT Secular!!

The g'd of theoretical science is the Pharisee Religion's g'd. Anyone can read of each and every concept that makes up an evolution-based "creation scenario" that has become today's textbook cosmology and find them in ancient Rabbinic writings in the Zohar/Kabbala. It's a religion; it has a g'd. There is nothing "secular" about the "theoretical science" the world believes is really secular with no religious affiliation. HERE - scroll down to section 4 )
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Revolt Against Heliocentricity Now Brewing!

The Heliocentricity Model is one of the five essentials of
The Big Bang Evolutionary Paradigm
1. Big bangism
2. Expanding universe
3. Fifteen billion year old universe
4. Heliocentricity
5. Relativity

All of those essentials form an "alternate creation scenario" promoted by anti-Christ, anti-Bible Pharisaic Kabbalists. If one concludes that Geocentrism is 'unique' science based "solely on a supernatural/theological position" then what can one conclude about the 'unique' science based "solely on a supernatural/theological position" of another religion which contradicts the Bible on every major doctrine ( and, of course, hates Jesus and has Him boiling in crap in hell )? Instead of starting with the Geo/helio controversy--the truth of which is indispensable to both theological positions,
perhaps we should start with the Religions and their Holy Books and the God/g'd which is behind these theological positions?
When that is done - using only facts and excluding assumptions based upon other assumptions...along with the willfully deceptive "secular" science claim...and certifiably fraudulent use of virtual reality technology - one is faced squarely with deciding which religion and which God/g'd one trusts. And, oh yes, it is useful to note the admitted theological position of the Pharisee Kabbalists is that Satan is their g'd. The heliocentricity keystone of the Kabbalist Kosmos is pure illusion in defiance of all observational evidence. Marshall Hall

"I believe the following question--in one form or another--goes to the heart of all that is called cosmology: 'Whether it is true or false that without the heliocentricity model there would be no Big Bang Model?' Moreover, I believe anyone can understand that undeviatingly factual answers to that question will identify and flush out all of the error and leave five centuries of baseless theoretical science naked and recognized for what it is, viz., a monumental deception pulled off by the Pharisee Religion working out of their anti-Bible, anti-Christ Zohar/Kabbala playbook...and, oh yes, Satan-empowered." Marshall Hall
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Fake Jap Moon Photo:

It's the curvature relative to the feature sizes in the Japanese photo and
then compared with the larger curvature and lesser detail in the NASA photo. Regarding the high definition of the Japanese photo, the NASA photo was supposed to have been taken on film - a very much higher resolution because of the emulsion grain size. The two moons shown cannot possibly be the same moon with or without stars... The craters appear to be too big compared to the horizon curvature. Jack Lewis
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.answersingenesis.org/CreationWise/CW_Pages/CW_TOC.asp

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Question/Statement:

"To beg the question: to pass over or ignore a question by assuming it to be established or settled; to assume as proven the very thing one is trying to prove. Example - to pass over or ignore the question of 'Is the Earth moving?' by assuming it to be established or settled; to assume that the Earth is moving when trying to disprove that the Earth is NOT moving."

Answers by Allen Daves: start here:

1: "Excellent. Since there is no observation or experience that the Earth is moving without assuming that the Earth is indeed moving ( begging the question ) therefore the only logical course to begin from is a model of the Earth absent of any movement and then attempt to prove or demonstrate movement, if any. Of course all the experiments, without begging the question, would lead one to the conclusion that the Earth is in fact not in motion. It is only via the assumption of its movement, which was never demonstrated to begin with, that one can even begin to explain away the observations and experience that are consistent with the only logical positions to start from, namely that the Earth is without any demonstrable motion. Therefore to assume that the Earth does in fact move is to build upon a foundation of sand and to suggest that it is or must be moving because it could be in some theoretical or imaginary framework, and then to call it science, is not only a circular fallacy but is, well.... quite silly!"

2: The whole concept of larger objects going around smaller objects begs the question without knowledge of what and where the center of mass for all the objects in question ( the universe ) is in the first place. You must start with what you have not with what you imagine. To start with a model with no motion of the Earth is not a proof for or against Earth motion nor does it assume anything. It is the only logical position from which to begin the experimental and theoretical process necessary to ascertain any proof for or against. The model itself is not proof, it is only a premise or foundation for the discovery process. As stated many times one must logically begin with what you have not with what you do not have, and since proof for motion is the question, any model that assumes motion or interprets the data in terms of motion that is used to support or build upon a case for motion is a circular fallacy. Whereas taking observations and conducting experiments with no assumptions of motion is simply beginning with what you have. What you have does not include any argument or justification for incorporating that idea into ones interpretations of observations. To look out and see other objects in the heavens move does not tell you what is absolute motion, or what or whether or not you would and could feel/detect those motions if you were there ... and since you are not there ... think about that for a while.

3a: We woke up in a world where things appear to move around us. We had and have no sensation of movement itself. That is where this whole question of the Earth's movement must and did begin ... "everything moving around me." From that point a process of observation and experiment then proceeds to ascertain what is and what is not moving. Well, those experiments which were conducted to make that distinction did show that the Earth is indeed NOT moving. The observations of mass centered on the Earth also promote the Earth's centrality of that position as well. You cannot interpret those observations and experiments in light of a heliocentric framework because that is what those experiments and observations are all about. This is your circular fallacy... those who developed and conducted those experiments and observations were not assuming an Earth-centered universe ... ( they were invoking a circular fallacy when they developed and performed them ).

An Earth not in motion is exactly what those experiments showed, and the only thing that those observations demonstrate, without invoking circular fallacies about the Earth's movement first. It amazes me that you cannot see just how ridiculous your argument is and the fact that the only way to even begin to interpret data as consistent with the heliocentric theory is to assume that heliocentricity is preferred. There has been no experiment conducted on Earth with regard to gravity or any other theory that demonstrates anything other than what the initial observations and experiments show. They do not show things moving around you without invoking the heliocentric circular fallacy first.

3b: Heliocentricity is not logically plausible based on what is available without assuming that what you do not have is real. Your position makes no sense without assuming that heliocentricity is preferred first ... which is what everything that led up to and including today's model of heliocentricity was developed to prove in the first place.

The problem is that nothing ever did prove heliocentricity without assuming that heliocentricity was the preferred conclusion to begin with, which is what it is trying to prove! Why is it so hard for you guys to grasp your arguments utter ridiculousness? Until you have observations and experience for Earth's movement your position is as plausible as aliens and abductions... thus we should build our lives around the "fact" that they are the most reasonable and plausible explanation for all unknown phenomena!? Your arguments and examples are in fact examples, not of heliocentricity's plausibility, but rather foolishness of the highest order. Demonstrate or concede but don't use Geocentrism's evidence for heliocentricity by begging the question that heliocentricity is preferred ... because until you have that evidence for heliocentricity all the evidence supports Geocentrism without assuming anything. Starting with the very first observation ever made namely the sky is moving around you but you have no sensation of movement. All subsequent observations and experiments have been consistent with no movement of the Earth and not one has shown itself to be for heliocentricity without assuming heliocentricity is preferred first, which is the question you beg and the circular fallacy you without fail, must invoke!

4a: If you are going to appeal to observation and experiment as the solid foundation of "reasoning the issue out" then you can't appeal to theory when observation and experiment do not support that position. Theories about the aether are irrelevant. What is observed and experimentally verified, as so far as it has been conducted in every case attempted, is that relative motion can be easily distinguished from absolute motion via the effects that motion has on light in every case ever observed or performed. There is no other logical conclusion based on observation and experiment that can be logically concluded without imagining and/or assuming some other construct first, without having observational or experimental support for such a thing. You keep invoking circular fallacies and attempting to justify them via your theories and "it could" but when someone points out that it could just as well mean something else you appeal to "observations". Which is it? If you bother to think about it for any length of time you will see that in either case, theory or observation, Geocentrism is the only position that has all the possible and logically sound arguments based on what is available/observed in the past and present. Whereas heliocentricity is built on what is not observed or experienced. As for illusions, that position only makes any sense whatsoever if you have a justification for "it's an illusion" otherwise this conversation itself could just be an illusion! To say that, "it could", therefore that is the most reasonable explanation is ridiculous as well as circular. The universe does not behave disorderly unless you assume that first - that is a fundamental difference between heliocentricity and Geocentrism. When we look out we can see some smaller objects orbiting larger objects but we do not see all smaller objects orbiting some larger objects. All assertions to that fact do assume that to be the case. But the sun circles me, I do not see me circling the sun without assuming that is what is really going on first. As for experiments and observations here on Earth we can distinguish between motion and non-motion regardless of how many "frames" we attempt to create via optical gyroscopes. There is no experiment that demonstrates that there is such a thing as a local reference frame that can be isolated from any other reference frame. So what experiments you are attempting to put forward and what laws of gravity and motion you keep trying to appeal to, do not exist to prove your conclusion without assuming your conclusion is true first. The whole heliocentric position is built on a house of cards and what's worse - none of them rate any higher than a Joker.

4b: The disagreements that do exist between the various Geocentric scientists have absolutely no bearing on the fact that the only experience available to man - observational or experimental - are only consistent with Geocentrism and are not consistent with heliocentricity without assuming

( begging the question ) that the universe is heliocentric first ... that the universe is something other than what can be demonstrated from observation and experiment, if that's the case then they should have no problem with us Jesus folks, otherwise there is no observation or experiment demonstrating heliocentricity without assuming it is true first ( begging the question ). The heliocentrists position is not only logically untenable but has, by its own refusal to accept observation and experiment when it conflicts with its predetermined conclusion about the Earth's motion, has in effect created a "science" that can never prove anything - "ever learning and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth" of anything. If imagination is the justification for heliocentricity then it is not "science". If observation and experiment are to be the benchmarks then there is no room for the heliocentric theory except in one's imagination!

5: I have and am pointing out that GC/GS ( Geocentric/Geostationary ) is the only logically deduced conclusion that one can make that can be demonstrated, because you cannot reach any other conclusion without imagining what cannot or has not been observed or experienced.

Yes "theoretically" the sun or the Earth could be moving but only one of those theories/reasons

( why things look they way they do ) can be demonstrated as a logically deduced conclusion whereas the other cannot without invoking pure imagination first. If you go outside, look up and see something traverse from your left to your right ( could be a bird or could be a plane ) your first impulse is not, "Hey I am moving", without observation and experiment ( O&E ) that tells you that...that would be foolish. Now, what tells you the sun is not doing the moving without imagining it first? Yes it could be. But you cannot show a logically deductive path for such a conclusion even if it were true. Therefore you cannot claim that the theory that you are moving is the most plausible explanation for what you observe any more so than with a bird or a plane.

What you seem to miss is that a theory and a logical deduction do not follow each other automatically. Feel free to theorize whatever you like but true science claims logical theories as the best ones - and rightly so. They just don't always employ the logical ones. As with you they sometimes prefer imagination over logical deduction. Fine, but don't call it reasonable or the most plausible; there is no logic in that reason nor can you even show it any more plausible without begging the questions, or else you can suppose there are aliens that live in my attic as the theory and reason for all my troubles...

End of Answers by Allen Daves:

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sun's Path Diagram ( more complex ) - Created by Allen Daves:

NEP = North Ecliptic Pole, SEP = South Ecliptic Pole, NCP = North Celestial Pole, SCP = South Celestial Pole

HC = Heliocentrism, GC = Geocentrism/Geostatic, AC = Acentric

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Moon's Path Diagram ( more complex ) - Created by Allen Daves:

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analemma:

Explanation: If you took a picture of the Sun at the same time each day, would it remain in the same position? The answer is no, and the shape traced out by theSun over the course of a year is called an analemma. The Sun will appear at its highest point of the analemma during summer and at its lowest during winter. Analemmas created from different Earth latitudes would appear at least slightly different, as well as analemmas created at a different time each day. The analemma pictured above was built up by Sun photographs taken from 1998 August through 1999 August from Ukraine. The foreground picture from the same location was taken during the early evening in 1999 July.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CreationWise Cartoon
http://www.answersingenesis.org/CreationWise/CW_Pages/CW_TOC.asp

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Three minute Music break HERE ( not an endorsement of The State )

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"A parable is commonly defined as "an earthly story with a heavenly meaning." It rests on the basis that man is made in the image of God, hence the natural types the Spiritual because the law of reproduction requires that everything bring forth after its kind so there is a continuity of the human with the Divine ( Genesis 1:11 "And God said, Let the Earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, and the fruit tree yielding fruit after his kind, whose seed is in itself, upon the Earth: and it was so." Genesis 1:26 "And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the Earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the Earth." Luke 3:38 "Which was the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God." In the parables of Jesus, the natural world becomes a visible witness reflecting the invisible spiritual realm. Jesus' purpose in employing parables was the judicial veiling of truth as well as dialectic, to discriminate between the believer, the make-believer, and the un-believer. The parable, which was to the carnal a veiling, is to the receptive a progressive revealing of the truth. It was a penalty or a blessing according to the state of the hearer: a darkening to those who loved darkness, enshrining the truth ( concerning Messiah's Spiritual Kingdom—so different from Jewish expectations ) from the jeers of the scoffer, and leaving something for the careless non-elect afterwards to think over, while enlightening the diligent seeker of truth. His purpose remains unchanged to this day . . . The veil was sufficiently transparent to allow the spiritual easily to see the truth [ like Geocentrism ] underneath, while those who were unspiritual saw only the sacred drapery of the parable in which He had wrapped the pearl so as not to cast it before swine." Anthony Grigor-Scott

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cosmology for $1,000.00

Clue: It is a false-science, religious, anti-Biblical deception held together by unproven assumptions to explain phenomena that are readily explainable without the assumptions.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sixty-seven ( 67 ) Scriptural References Which Tell Us That It

Is The Sun And Not The Earth That Moves:

http://www.fixedearth.com/sixty-seven%20references.htm

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eight Minute Music Break: HERE.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Einstein - Was He a Thief, a Liar and a Plagiarist?

Einstein: Relativity Hoax HERE. Plagiarist of the Century: HERE, HERE

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bible Warning to non-Geocentrism Churches. Also Bible Warning to non-Geocentrism Mainstream "Creationist" Organizations. HERE

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Koran - Like The Bible - Refutes Heliocentricity

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Geocentrism two-pager to distribute in your city: HERE

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Prayer

"Heavenly Father, thank-you for creating the Universe, the Earth, and Mankind. I believe your Word is the Truth. I repent for all the times that I have rejected Truth and embraced the Lies of sin, especially Satan's Moving-Earth Deception. Thank-you for the forgiveness that I have through the blood of Jesus and his finished work on the cross! As I set out to learn your Teachings and apply them, please help me re-establish Truth in my innermost parts, especially in the area of Cosmology and Astronomy. With your light, please expose the Lie of Copernican Heliocentricity that I have believed and tolerated. Please sharpen my discernment of Truth and strengthen me to reject the Lies of Mainstream Science every time I am confronted by them. Thank-you, Father! In Jesus' name I pray, Amen."

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Declaration and Disclaimer

At all times and places, I, commonly known as Bernard of the Brauer family, have been, am and will be as our Creator God made me: An actual man, made in God's image and endowed by my Creator with certain unalienable Rights. Unless otherwise expressly and without duress and voluntarily agreed upon by me in writing over my actual hand-written signature: I exercise my actual rights of religious, political and scientific freedom of choice to declare that the venue of all of my conduct, speech, writings, agreements, residence and domicile is: without The State and actually on the soil and surface of the entire Earth; that all of my acts take place in a Year of our Lord; that I act at arm's length and without prejudice to my capacity as a sovereign by the grace of God; that I do not consent to act as, or as part of, any "double personality," "double capacity," and/or "double character"; that my duty of obedience is only to that human being(s) authority that exists under the Commands stated by Creator God as per Romans 13:1-8 and is consistent with all 66 Books of the Christian Holy Bible KJV; that I have not knowingly and voluntarily consented to be subject by virtue of mere statute, rule, regulation, emergency, or alleged moral obligation to the authority of any "corporation" or implied "charitable trust" that is in violation of Creator God's Law; that my purposes are at all times "righteous, Christian and opposing Satan" first and dedicated to restoring understanding and respect for the spiritual, political and scientific principles which provide the foundation for the form of government under Creator God.

Webpage Compilation by:

I, commonly known as Bernard of the Brauer family
Living soul, man, created by God, free will status
Proficiency in the English language and Christian Bible
Academic degree - Se. M. (Hons)
[ that means .....Self-educated Man, Honors : ~ ) ]

Link to this Posting: http://sites.google.com/site/earthdeception

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Other Deceptions HERE: http://sites.google.com/site/educatesouls