Love for Life

Never Believe Anything Historical Written By Zionists Or Jesuits
They Both Have Been Spreading Lies About Monotheism
By Alex James
30th September 2008

Guys and Gals,

Rule #1: Never believe anything historical written by Zionists or Jesuits. They both have been spreading lies about Monotheism and they have been fabricating false versions of Monotheism (among other fabrications of news and history, and these lies is what Kannan and Lalgehi keep repeating like a parrot). Thus, everything you know about Monotheistic prophets is wrong if you take it from Zionist sources. Another fabrication of Zionists is that Jews are Israelites. Another fabrication of the Zionists is the Scofield interpretation of the Bible which says that Zionists ought to be worshipped as gods (this is what Kannan and Lalgehi do, their holy cow is actually Zionism). Here’s an article explaining that Jews are impostering as Israelites. Next, a few quotes about the True version of Islam.

“Judahites” or “Judeans are NOT JEWS: European Khazar Jews are Japhites/Yaphites mixed races who converted to Babylonian Talmudism in 8th Century AC

“The story of the Jewish people is how they came to IMPERSONATE Israel and Judah….So, the question, which is so often asked, “Who are the REAL Jews,” is a false question. The real Jews are the modern antichrists that we know today. The question that should be asked is: “Who are the REAL Judeans?” Or even better, “Who are the REAL Judahites?” The real Judahites are the blood descendants of the Tribe of Judah. No one else qualifies. And since the Jews are NOT blood descendants of the Tribe of Judah, the real Jews have always been deceiving the world with their lies for the last two thousand years”

“All instances of the word ‘Jew’ in the Old Testament are translated from the Hebrew Yehudi (Judah). Now, it is a fact that these Judahites NEVER referred to themselves as “Jews.” They simply referred to themselves as Judah and they called their territory “the land of Judah.” Whenever you see the word Jew substituted for the word Judah in Scripture, it means some editor has made this substitution, because the Jewish people have never been in any way related to the Tribe of Judah.”

Judahites ----------------------------------------- Jews

Never called “Jews” ------------------------ Always called “Jews”

Racially exclusive --------------------------- Thoroughly mongrelized

Law of Moses -------------------------------- Tradition of the Elders (Talmud)

Patrilineal Descent ------------------------- Matrilineal Descent (Edomite tradition)

Accepted the Messiah --------------------- Plotted to have Romans Murder the Messiah

#1. Never refer to a Judahite as a Jew. Never refer to JESUS as a Jew!!! A Jew is one who pretends to be a Judahite. The pretender can never be the real thing.

#2. Never refer to Judaism as the religion of the Old Testament.

#3. Never accept as Jew as an Israelite. They are not the same.

#4. Never accept a Jew as a Shemite. Khazars and Sephardics are not Shemites.

#5. Never accept a Jew as a Hebrew. They are not the same.

#6. Never accept a Jew as an Adamite/Aryan.

#7. Never accept Judaism as the “predecessor” of Christianity. Judaism is, in thousands of ways, and in every possible way, the distortion, denial, and the debauchery of the Law of Moses, the very opposite of the Law of Moses. Read the Talmud for yourself, if you don’t believe me.

#8. Never, never, never, confuse an Israeli with an Israelite. They are NOT the same!!!!

Therefore, we must NEVER apply the word Jew to a Judahite. To do so is an insult to a Judahite or an Israelite. Since the Judahites were ALWAYS racially segregated, Mosaic Law practicing, patrilineal descendants of the Tribe of Judah, how can the Judahites possibly be equated with a thoroughly mongrelized, matrilineal, Talmud practicing bunch of Khazars?

An Informed Consensus, Revisited

Or, the Scriptural and Historical Distinctions Between Jews and Judahites

Or, Jewish Word Games Exposed

By Pastor Eli James

“And the heathen shall know that I Yahweh do sanctify Israel, when my sanctuary shall be in the midst of them for evermore.”- Ezek. 38:28.

“And thou shalt know that I am Yahweh, and that I have heard all thy blasphemies which thou hast spoken against the mountains of Israel, saying, ‘They are laid desolate, they are given us to consume.’ Thus with your mouth you boasted against me, and have multiplied your words against me: I have heard them. Thus saith Yahweh Elohim: When the whole earth rejoiceth, I will make thee desolate. As thou didst rejoice at the inheritance of the house of Israel, because it was desolate, so will I do unto thee: thou shalt be desolate, O Mount Seir, and all Idumea, even all of it: and they shall know that I am Yahweh.” - Ezek. 35:12:15.

“For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall show great signs and wonders; insomuch that, IF IT WERE POSSIBLE, THEY SHALL DECEIVE THE VERY ELECT.” - Matt. 24:24.

Introduction

It’s almost a given that anyone you meet will tell you that the Jews are “God’s Chosen people, Israel.” But this is the oldest, biggest lie of history. The fact is that, by their own admission, 90 – 95% of modern Jews are completely unrelated to ancient Israel. I’m speaking of the Ashkenazi Jews, who are the descendants of the Khazar nation of Eastern Europe. Not one of these Khazars has a single ancestor that was an Israelite, or a Hebrew or a Shemite. The fact is that these Ashkenazi Khazars are a mixed race breed, comprised of two main stocks: Japhethites and Mongols, plus many other races and ethnicities. But, by virtue of the fact that these mongrelized Khazars converted to Judaism in the 8th Century AD, we are expected to identify them with the racially exclusive Israelites, Shemites and Hebrews. How converting to Judaism can change your DNA from Khazar to Shemite is beyond my comprehension, yet this is how we are expected to treat these Khazars, as if they were, in fact, Israelites, when we know very well that they never were, are not now, nor can they ever be Israelites. Ironically, if you point this fact out publicly, you are accused of being an “anti-Semite.”

This is just one example of the Jewish word games that the rabbis of Judaism have invented to confuse Christians. We are expected to ignore this ethnic reality and simply treat all Jews as if they are Israelites, even though NONE of them are – and that includes the Sephardic Jews, who originated in the Middle East!!!!

Since not a single Jew in the world today is a direct descendant of the biblical Shem, the word, anti-Semitism, is a clever deception, which promotes the idea that the Jews are Shemites, which they are not. In popular usage, anti-Semitism means anti-Jewish; but since 90-95% of Jews have no blood relationship to the Shemites of the Bible, how can anti-Semitism be equated with anti-Judaism? The concepts are not equal. Jews and Shemites are, in fact, two racially distinct and unrelated groups; but since we are playing Jewish word games, we just go along and pretend that these words mean what the Jews claim they mean.

The other major component of Jewry is the Sephardic Jews. The Sephardic Jews actually originated in the area of Palestine, but these Sephardic Jews are descendants of the Canaanites, who dwelt in Palestine for a thousand years before the Israelites were commanded by Yahweh to go in and take possession of the land of Canaan and exterminate every last Canaanite. Unfortunately, our warriors let too many of them get away, and now they are pricks in our sides.

The surviving Canaanites eventually became known as Edomites, after Esau married into their ranks. After the Israelites took away the majority of the land of Canaan, the Edomites were left with only the southernmost portions of Canaanland. The Tribe of Judah was given the territory bordering this Edomite land, which became the northernmost province of Canaanland; and this territory eventually became known as Idumea.

So, Esau race-mixed. In the words of Abraham:

Genesis 24:3. And I will make thee swear by my LORD, the God of heaven, and the God of earth, that thou shalt not take a wife unto my son of the daughters of the Canaanites, among whom I dwell: 4) But thou shalt go unto my country, and unto my kindred, and take a wife unto my son Isaac.

So, of the two main branches of Jewry, only one branch, the Sephardic branch, has ever had any historic presence in Palestine; and that presence was as the enemies of Israel, not as Israel or Judah. The question before us is this: “How did these non-Judahite, non-Israelite, non-Shemitic, non-Hebrew people come to be identified with Israel and Judah?” Or, “How did our worst enemies steal our Identity?” And the answer to this question is 2,000 years of repeating the same lies over and over.

The story of the Jewish people is how they came to IMPERSONATE Israel and Judah. And by impersonating Israel and Judah, they have become identified with the people they actually hate most: True Israel. Along the way, the Jews received an unbelievable stroke of good luck: True Israel developed a case of amnesia. We Israelites, through centuries of war and false religion, have forgotten our Israelite roots. Thus, Jewish claims to the names of Israel and Judah have remained unchallenged until the emergence of the Christian Identity Movement. As long as True Israel remains in the dark about these Jewish pretensions, our people will continue to wallow in religious, economic, and political confusion. From this perspective, then, it is absolutely crucial that we finally solve this Identity crisis; and the only way to do that is to differentiate between Jews and Judahites. I will now deal with the subject of the Sephardic Jews and how they have been impersonating Judah, since about 125 BC.

Old Testament

All instances of the word ‘Jew’ in the Old Testament are translated from the Hebrew Yehudi (Judah).

Now, it is a fact that these Judahites NEVER referred to themselves as “Jews.” They simply referred to themselves as Judah and they called their territory “the land of Judah.”

Whenever you see the word Jew substituted for the word Judah in Scripture, it means some editor has made this substitution, because the Jewish people have never been in any way related to the Tribe of Judah.

In a similar manner, no American Indians have ever referred to themselves as “Indians.” Rather, they call themselves by their tribal names, i.e., Iroquois, Apache, Commanche, Cherokee, Illini, etc.

Now, since the modern Jews of this world refer to themselves as Jews, we have no reason to reject that word with regard to that breed. I say breed because the Jewish people, by their own admission, are NOT a distinct race. They are the most race-mixed breed of people on the face of this earth. And this is what accounts for their numerous genetic diseases.

In contrast, the Judahites of Scripture were a racially exclusive people, who shunned the company, culture and religion of the surrounding peoples. They especially shunned the Canaanites, who were historically the bitter enemies of all Israel, even up to the time of Christ, when the Canaanites had become known as Idumeans.

Now, if it is true, as the Jews would have us believe, that this mongrelized people emerged out of the racially exclusive people of Judah, then the question must be asked: “At what point in history did the segregationist Judahites reverse their religious and racial exclusivity and become mongrelized Jews?” But no one ever asks this question. The reason why this question is never asked is because the answer sheds a ton of light upon the historical Jewish impersonation of both Judah and Israel, an impersonation which has been going on for the last 2,000 years.

Later, I will explain exactly why this change never happened, although the Jews insist that it did, for the legitimacy of both their religion and culture depend upon us believing their false version of history.

There is even a more important question: “At what point did Yahweh change His mind about forbidding miscegenation?” This is another question that no Jew or Judeo-Christian will ever broach, for the answers to these questions are destructive of the two worldviews that dominate Western thinking today: Judaism and Judeo-Christianity. The fact is that Yahweh NEVER changed His mind about the exclusivity of His People, Israel. He created our DNA. He didn’t create it so that it should be destroyed by race-mixing. He created us to take dominion of this planet away from the Nachash/Serpent people of Genesis. That’s what Adam and Eve were supposed to do, but they fell for Satan’s deceptions, and lost their Shekinah Glory, by being tricked into giving it away.

So, when Yahweh tells us, “I am Yahweh, I change not” (Mal. 3:6), whom are we going to believe, Yahweh, or the Jews?

The Theological Source of this Confusion

In his Study In Revelation, Howard B. Rand, as a commentary to Rev. 2:9 and 3:9, says the following:

"There are those who declare they are Jews, but in reality are the synagogue of Satan. When Jewry crucified Christ they ceased to be Jews in a spiritual sense. Until then, God had been with them but now their place of worship, the synagogue, had become the abode of the adversary." [p. 12]

Mr. Rand is clearly confused. He thinks that the Jews were, at one time or another, Judahites. Like so many other deceived people, he thought that the Jewish people originated in the Judahites of the land of Judah. I can assure you that this is not possible.

Just because the rabbis have very cleverly and deceitfully used the word 'Jew' to apply to both themselves AND to the House of Judah does not mean that they ever were the latter! If an actor impersonates your brother, does that mean that he IS your brother? Just like Eve, the true Israelites have allowed themselves to be fooled by some very clever, diabolical deceptions.

E. Raymond Capt suffers under the same illusion. In his book, Missing Links Discovered in Assyrian Tablets, he says,

"After the Babylonian Empire was overthrown by Cyrus, king of the Persians, the exiled Judeans were allowed to return to their homeland. Of the hundreds of thousands originally taken captive, less than 50,000 accepted the invitation to return to Palestine. It is this 'remnant' that became known as the 'Jews,' a name meaning 'remnant of Judah,' and never having been applied to any branch of the Semitic peoples prior to the Babylonian Captivity ." -- p. 93.

Unfortunately, Mr. Capt has got this completely wrong. I have nowhere else found a definition of 'Jew' meaning "remnant of Judah." It is simply a matter of historical fact that this remnant of Judah fully retained the name, 'Judah,' and they were not known, ever, as Jews, because the Jews, unlike True Judah, have always practiced race-mixing and have always practiced a different religion. The people of Judah called their nation "Judah" until the day that Judah and Idumea, a nation of Edomites at the southern border of Judah, were merged by King John Hyrcanus of Judah around 125 B.C. Until that date, there was no such thing as a Jew. There were only Judahites and Idumeans.

A Jew is one who pretends to be a Judahite, or, perhaps, better, a Jew is a counterfeit Judahite. Rev. 2:9 says, "I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich), and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews [Ioudaios, meaning true Judeans, or Judahites], and are not, but are of the synagog of Satan." Rev. 3:9 tells us, "Behold, I will make them of the synagog of Satan, which say they are Jews [Judahites] , and are not, but do lie; Behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee."

Is it conceivable that Jesus, when He says, “I will make them to come and worship before thy feet and to know that I have loved thee,” is talking here to the Jewish people, after he has identified them as the "children of the devil" (John 8:44)? NO! He is talking to the House of Judah about the impersonating Jews! Who are those who say they are of Judah but are not? Who is it that is impersonating Judah? Judah cannot impersonate Judah. Judah IS Judah. It is the Jews who are impersonating Judah and Israel. These two verses make no sense otherwise. And, most certainly, the house of Judah is NOT the synagogue of Satan. If you do not understand that Jewry with their priesthood, the rabbinate, is the synagogue of Satan, then you do not understand the New Testament! Why do you think the Jews hate the New Testament so much? Because it is so anti-Jewish!

Who on earth would want to impersonate a Jew anyway? Obviously, the above translation is terribly defective, and it obscures the historical, cultural and ethnic distinctions that must obtain between two mutually exclusive and antagonist groups: Jews and Judahites! Don't confuse the two! Jesus is talking to Judah and Israel and is warning us about this great impersonation by those Edomites (of the nation of Idumea) who have usurped the name of Judah, by slyly substituting the word Jew for Judah.

The Greek Ioudaios is always best translated as “Judean.” From the context, it is usually not difficult to tell if the Judeans being talked about are Edomite Jews, Judahites, or a mixture of both.

By inventing this term, "spiritual Jew," Mr. Rand and Mr. Capt have bought into the Jewish charade and are thus unaware of the nature and extent of this impersonation. They seem to think that the Judahites who returned from the Babylonian Captivity underwent some sort of spiritual transformation and became Christ-hating Jews as a result. Obviously, a Judahite can become a Jew by conversion to their religion. But can a race-mixed mamzer (Jew) ever become a Judahite? Hardly. Yahweh was never with the Jews because the Jews have always been the children of a lesser god, the god that encourages race-mixing in direct opposition to Yahweh! The Jews have never worshipped Yahweh. They only pretend to. The proof of this is the fact that the rabbis teach that the Name of Yahweh is “too holy to be pronounced.” The problem with this teaching is that it is not contained in Scripture. This is just one of thousands of rabbinical opinions which have been grafted onto the Bible by the synagogue of Satan. The rabbis have always been deceivers and they will remain deceivers because that is their nature. It is in their blood.

The source of this confusion concerning the origin of Judaism can be traced directly to a rabbinical statement which many of our people have latched on to as if it were solid history. Here is the statement:

"The return from Babylon, and the adoption of the Babylonian Talmud marks the end of Hebrewism, and the beginning of Judaism." -- Rabbi Stephen F. Wise, Chief Rabbi of the United States. (21 words.)

Rabbi Wise's statement is pure rabbinical deception of the most clever kind. The "good" rabbi knows that most of us don't know the history of our own people, so he gets away with several historical inaccuracies in this one, short statement. Most Christian Identity adherents know that there must have been a historical time when there was a shift in religious teaching, from the Law of Moses to Talmudism. The statement above appears to pinpoint this transition to the time of the return of Judah from the Babylonian Captivity. The genius of this deception becomes evident when it is realized that most people will assume that, because our people were held captive so long in Babylon, THEY MUST HAVE PICKED UP BABYLONIAN TEACHING THEN AND THERE. This is a most reasonable assumption. But the fact is that they did not. The Books of Ezra and Nehemiah prove conclusively that the remnant that returned from Babylon completely rejected Babylonian teaching and returned, under the guidance of those two priests, to God's Law.

In fact, Yahweh Himself declared that the House of Judah was to be taken captive to Babylon "for their good"! (Jer. 24:5) If Rabbi Wise's statement were true, it would have been a total catastrophe for Judah! The return from the captivity, contrary to Rabbi Wise's statement, which is believed by so many, instead inaugurated a Golden Age of Mosaic Law, NOT a change to Judaism. Indeed, if this were not the case, the Messiah could have never come to a people so completely adulterated as the Jews! The racial descent laws had to apply or Jesus could not have been born ! So, whom are you going to believe, the Bible or a rabbi?

Here is the whole prophecy from Jeremiah, Chapter 24, giving us the distinction between the good figs and the evil figs:

"Thus sayeth Yahweh, the God of Israel; Like these good figs, so will I acknowledge them that are carried away captive of Judah, whom I have sent out of this place into the land of Chaldea [Babylon], for their good. For I will set mine eyes upon them for good, and I will bring them again to this land: and I will build them, and not pull them down; and I will plant them, and not pluck them up. And I will give them an heart to know me, that I am Yahweh: and they shall be my people, and I will be their God: for they shall return to me with their whole heart." (Vs. 5-7)

In complete fulfillment of this prophecy, Ezra and Nehemiah reestablished the racial laws forbidding intermarriage. They found the old Jerusalem books of genealogy (Neh. Chapter 7) and threw out of the congregation all of those who could not verify their 100% Judahite lineage! Does this square with what Capt and Rand teach? No, it does not.

Capt and Rand have been deceived by the rabbis; and they have not done the historical research which proves that this statement is a lie. Rabbi Wise's statement is calculated to deceive in five ways.

So, let’s explore the five lies that are contained in these 21 words.

Lie #1. It presumes an identity between Judahites and Jews. We have already touched upon the presumed identity between Judahites and Jews. The fact is that there was never any such identity. Abraham was not a Jew. Isaac was not a Jew. Jacob was not a Jew. Not even Judah was a Jew. Judah was the founder of the tribe of Judahites; and only his descendants, and nobody else, can qualify as a Judahite.

Also the Judahites who returned from Babylon endeavored to preserve their racial purity all the way down to the time when Jesus walked the earth. There is simply no doubt about this; but this is an area of history that no Jew or Judeo-Christian is willing to discuss.

Ezra and Nehemiah went so far as to look up the genealogies of all the priests; and any priest whose name was not found in the books was disqualified. Also, any priest who had taken a non-Israelite or non-Adamite wife was ordered to put her away, along with his mongrel children, or he would be disqualified also. In addition, the returning Judahites shunned the help of the Samaritans who had offered to help rebuild the Temple. But Ezra and Nehemiah preached the exclusivity of Israel and Judah, so they had no use for the unholy seed working on a project, which only the Holy Seed could be allowed to undertake.

Read the books of Ezra and Nehemiah for yourself; and you will see that the racial exclusivity of these Judahites was their primary motivating force. They understood that they were the Holy Seed, and the Holy Seed shall NOT mingle itself with any other seed.

Since we know that the Jews have always been a mongrelized people, we know that this change in ethnic status could not have happened when Rabbi Wise claims it did.

Lie #2. It suggests a plausible yet false scenario for the change from Hebrewism (the Law of Moses) to Judaism (Talmudism). Virtually all Bible scholars have taken the Jews at their word and simply accept their claim that Judaism somehow evolved out of the Mosaic Law. This is what Rabbi Wise also claims in his most clever statement. He says that “Hebrewism became Judaism.”

Now, we know from all of Scripture that the Hebrews and Israelites were a racially exclusive people. There are literally hundreds of statements in the Old Testament forbidding the Israelites to take non-Adamite wives. And the books of Ezra and Nehemiah prove that the Tribe of Judah had no intention of changing this policy, so we know that this aspect of Hebrewism did not change among the Returnees. Quite the opposite.

Here is a sample from Nehemiah:

Nehemiah 13:23. In those days I saw Jews (sic, Judahites, those of the kingdom of Judah) that had married wives of Ashdod, of Ammon, and of Moab: 25 And I contended (argued) with them, and cursed them, and smote certain of them, and plucked off their hair, and made them swear by God, [saying], Ye shall not give your daughters unto their sons, nor take their daughters unto your sons, or for yourselves. 26 Did not Solomon king of Israel sin by these things? Yet among many nations was there no king like him, who was beloved of his God, and God made him king over all Israel; nevertheless even him did outlandish women cause him to sin.

The fact is that, as the prophecy of Jeremiah states, the Return from Babylon instituted a Golden Age of the Law among the House of Judah. Not one iota of rabbinical or Talmudic teaching was introduced during this time. So, Rabbi Wise is wrong about any change in doctrine as well as about any change in ethnicity.

Lie #3. Contrary to what he says, the Talmud was NOT adopted by those who returned. The Bible teaches otherwise. Judaism was started by the scribes and Pharisees. The sect of the Pharisees did not appear in history until the merger of Judah and Idumea in 125 B.C. This merger was accomplished by virtue of the anti-Mosaic decree of King John Hyrcanus of Judah. The resulting nation of mixed multitude came to be known as "Judea."

By stating that the Judahite priesthood started systematically changing doctrine, Rabbi Wise is trying to establish a false antiquity for Judaism. The Jews want us to believe that Judaism is as old as the Bible itself. But this is perhaps the most gigantic lie of all. The fact is that Judaism is not in any way related to the teachings of Moses; and Judaism itself is no older than 125 BC. I will prove this point later.

Furthermore, The Judahites NEVER referred to their doctrine as “Judaism.” Actually, they simply referred to it as “the Law of Moses.” And, anyone who has studied the Jewish Talmud knows that the Talmud and the Law of Moses are worlds apart, diametrically apart, and have no relationship whatsoever, except that there is a pretended, non-existent relationship that the rabbis want us to believe in. But Jesus Himself told us that their tradition is NOT to be equated with the Law of Moses.

“Why do ye also transgress the commandment of God by your tradition?…Thus have ye made the commandment of Go of NONE EFFECT by your tradition. Ye hypocrites, well did Isaiah prophesy of you, saying, THIS PEOPLE DRAWETH NIGH UNTO ME WITH THEIR MOUTH, AND HONORETH ME WITH THEIR LIPS; BUT THEIR HEART IS FAR FROM ME. BUT IN VAIN DO THEY WORSHIP ME, TEACHING FOR DOCTRINES THE COMMANDMENTS OF MEN.” - Matt. 15:3-9.

These words are also recorded by Mark, Chapter 7, verses 6-10.

Because Rabbi Wise is such a convincing liar, and because so few people have actually read the books of Ezra and Nehemiah, Rabbi Wise gets away with this incredible porksnot. Such lies are plausible only because of our ignorance of our own history. I hope to set the record straight today, so that no one will ever be confused about who the first Jew was and when the Jewish religion actually began. These two things will be firmly established today, both historically and Scripturally.

Lie #4. The Talmud, the written version of the oral traditions and teachings of the Pharisees, was not even completed until 500 A.D. The Talmud is the true source of the Jewish religion, not the Old Testament or the Law of Moses. The Jews admit this in their own writings, which are full of high praise for the Talmud, often stating that the Talmud is “holier” than the Law of Moses. From this factual history, we can see that Judaism is actually a very recent religion. All of its Scriptural content is, in fact, BORROWED from the writings of the Israelite and Judahite prophets, none of whom were Jews.

According to the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, Volume VIII (1942), p. 474:

“The Jewish religion as it is today traces its descent, without a break, through all the centuries, from the Pharisees. Their leading ideas and methods found expression in a literature of enormous extent, of which a very great deal is still in existence. The Talmud is the largest and most important single member of that literature.”

"... decisions regarding the Jewish religion must be based on the Talmud, as the final resume of those authorities when they existed." The Jews- Their History, Culture, and Religion, by Rabbi Louis Finklestein, Vol. 4, p. 132.

Rabbi Johanan said: A heathen who studies Torah deserves death. For it is written, “Moses commanded us a law for an inheritance; it is our inheritance, not theirs.” (Sanhedrin 59a)

Where does it state in the Bible that non-Israelites who study the Bible are deserving of death? Unless, of course, the “good Rabbi” means Talmud when he says Torah, for there is no such teaching in the Law of Moses.

"The Talmud consists of 63 books of legal, ethical, and historical writings of the ancient rabbis. It was edited centuries after the birth of Jesus. It is a compendium of law and lore. It is the legal code which forms the basis of Jewish religious law and it is the textbook used in the training of rabbis." Rabbi Kertzer, "What is a Jew?" -- article in Look Magazine, June 17, 1952.

If the Jewish religion morphed out of the Law of Moses, we absolutely MUST ask the question, “At what point in history did the Law of Moses, as practiced by the Levitical priesthood, become perverted by the rabbis, who practiced THEIR OWN TRADITION, which was never the same as the Law of Moses?”

Since we know that the Talmud was not formally completed until the Second Millennium, AD, there is simply no question as to Judaism’s rather late appearance in history. It certainly wasn’t during the time of the Return from Babylon.

Lie #5: Hebrewism never died. It was restored and energized by Ezra and Nehemiah. It was subsequently defended by the Maccabees and Hasmoneans, the True Judahite dynasties; and it was kept alive by the early Christians, and it is today known as Christian Identity.

Mosaism never died. It flourished in the days of Jesus and it became known, eventually, as Christianity. Since the Old Testament is the cause of the events that transpired in the New Testament, Christianity is the TRUE AND ONLY HEIR OF THE LAW OF MOSES, NOT JUDAISM. And the Judahites, Benjamites and other Israelites, not the Jews, are the true heirs of the Covenants and the birthright and the scepter of leadership.

The Jews would have us believe that Jesus was a Jew and that the Christianity owes its origins to Judaism. But these are just two more gigantic Jewish lies, two among many thousands of lies that Judaism still teaches today. Neither of these lies has any validity, either historically or Scripturally.

The Historical Record

“You can’t tell the players without a program.”

Given the fact that this historical era is of such great importance in understanding how the Idumeans came to impersonate Judah, one would assume that this Idumean usurpation would be foretold in Scripture. Indeed, it was:

“Therefore, thus saith Yahweh Elohim, Surely in the fire of my jealousy have I spoken against the residue of the heathen, and against all Idumea, which have appointed my land into their possession with the joy of all their heart, with despiteful minds, to cast it out for a prey.” -- Ezek. 36:5.

The major players: Antipater, Julius Caesar, Pompey, Mark Antony, the Parthians, John Hyrcanus, Herod the Great, the Pharisees

Scene: War Between Judah and Idumea.

Let’s see how these Idumeans went about appointing Yahweh’s land into their own possession:

In the year 125 BC, King John Hyrcanus made war against the neighboring Canaanite/Edomite nation of Idumea. In this war, the Judahites were completely victorious, thus subduing the last Canaanite stronghold of military resistance. But John Hyrcanus made a ghastly mistake in his dealings with the losers of this war. He offered them citizenship in the new nation along with the existing Judahite citizens of Judah. Then, he gave the Idumeans an ultimatum: be circumcised or die! Your foreskin or your life!

This ultimatum was given in the year 121 BC. Now, picture the long line of Idumean males queued up for circumcision. Picture this line in you mind. Picture the first guy in that line. That guy was the world’s first Jew. By forcibly merging the two countries, John Hyrcanus not only violated the exclusivity of Israel, he created the possibility for the Idumeans to pretend to be Judahites.

In effect John Hyrcanus committed the same sin that caused the nation of Judah to be exiled in the first place:

“The adversary has spread out his hand upon all her pleasant things: for she has seen that the heathen entered into her sanctuary, whom You did command that they should not enter into Your congregation.” - Lamentations. 1:10.

The best definition of a Jew is one who pretends to be a Judahite (Rev. 2:9 and 3:9.)

The first Idumean male to be circumcised could now pretend to be a Judahite, because he was given full citizenship in a nation which had, until this time, forbidden citizenship to all non-Israelites. In addition, these Idumeans were the descendants of those very Canaanites that Joshua was ordered to exterminate! John Hyrcanus had thus mixed the Holy Seed with the unholiest seed of all!

This being the historical fact of the matter, it is NOT true that these Idumeans “converted to Judaism,” for Judaism did not yet exist. Judaism only began to take shape as a result of this forced merger of two completely unrelated people – enemies, in fact.

The correct description of what happened is this:

By submitting to circumcision, the Edomite Jew came into being. This circumstance gave these Jews the opportunity to publicly pretend to obey the Law of Moses, while secretly substituting their own traditions. Thus, Judaism was born. The Idumeans NEVER converted to the Law of Moses. Their very inclusion into the nation of Judah was itself a violation of the Law of Moses, so how can this be described as a “conversion to Judaism.” The implication of the Jewish version of these events would suggest that these Idumeans accepted the Law of Moses. No. They never did. On the contrary, this is where and when the Edomites began to impersonate Judah and to pretend to follow Hebrewism. Thus, Judaism was BORN in 121 BC, as this illegal act of circumcision was the first Talmudic violation of the Mosaic Law, even though it was instituted by a True Judahite, John Hyrcanus. By letting the parasites into the fold, John Hyrcanus made possible the first violation in a long line of many thousands of violations, which Talmudic Judaism still practices today.

From this history, it is clearly evident that Judaism is a Johnny-come-lately religion. It has absolutely no rightful claim to a Biblical origin. So, before this date, 121 BC, there was no such thing as a Jew, and there was no such religion as Judaism. Both came into being as a result of this illegal merger of two enemy nations. Contrary to the fables of Judaism, the Kings of Judah allowed no circumcision of non-Judahites until this date; and this date is the beginning of the downfall of Judah into the hands of the Idumeans.

The Flowline of the Replacement of Hebrewism by Judaism

I will briefly summarize the referenced time period here:

As the Greek world was being conquered by the Roman world (280-133 BC), chaos reigned in the land of Judah. The Maccabees fought valiantly to retain their Judahite heritage and laws. Josephus tells us that Judas Maccabeus was very learned in and faithful to the Law. This is not true of any Jew who ever lived. The Jews are faithful, not to the Bible, but to their own, semi-secret interpretations. These traditions have always been known by various names, such as Mischnah, Zohar and Talmuds. The Caballah is also part of this anti-Mosaic tradition.

As the Greek Empire was being overthrown by the Roman Empire, the Royal House of Judah, also known as the House of David, was caught between a rock and hard place. The Maccabees gained independence from the Greeks in 147 BC, but they knew it was only a matter of time before the Roman Empire would expand to the south and attack Judah. This eventually happened in 63 BC, when Pompey took control of Judah. During this chaotic time, the Idumeans saw an opportunity to work with the Romans against the Royal House of Judah. Antipater, a conniving Idumean Edomite (a proto-typical “Jewish advisor”), often traveled to Rome, and by playing the Royal House of Judah against the Romans, was installed as vizier to King John Hyrcanus by Pompey under the authority of Julius Caesar. Later, after the assassination of Julius Caesar, Antipater connived with Mark Antony to overthrow the hereditary dynasty of Judah and put it into the hands of his sons, who were racial Idumeans, not Judahites.

John Hyrcanus, one of the last true Judahites to occupy the throne of Judah but also a very weak leader, fell into the Idumean trap when, after having defeated them militarily, merged these two disparate nations into one conglomerate, a “union” which actually set the stage for the downfall of the Maccabean/Hasmonean dynasty. He entered into a bargain with the Idumeans. By accepting them as citizens of Judah, the two nations of Idumea and Judah would be merged. Hyrcanus did not realize that he would be creating an instant Fifth Column of saboteurs and traitors when he annexed Idumea to Judah. This mixed nation became known as “Judea.” Of course, this violated the Mosaic Law which prohibits race-mixing and it also violated the principle, “Do not be unequally yoked with unbelievers.” (II Cor. 6:14) This merger of two disparate nations occurred in 125 BC and the circumcision of Idumean males began in 121 BC.

Antipater’s Revenge

“Antipater was one of history’s most unsavory characters. It was Antipater who had advised Hyrcanus to seek the help of the Nabateans in his struggle with his brother Aristobulus. The successful outcome of that struggle gained Antipater great influence in Judea. He was also a sycophant, servile to any Roman he thought would win. By playing up to Pompey, he was appointed governor of Idumea. After the defeat of Pompey at the battle of Pharsalus (48 BC) in Greece, Caesar took over the rule of Judea in the name of Rome. When Caesar was assassinated, Antipater fawned on Cassius, one of the conspirators in Caesar’s murder. After Antipater died in 43 BC, poisoned by loving family members at a feast with his concubines, he was succeeded by his son, Herod.”

- Max Dimont, The Jews, God, and History.

So, we can see from this history, which is readily available for all of us to read, that Judaism came into being as the result of the USURPATION of the throne of Judah by a bunch of evil, Edomite Jews. The idea that the racially exclusive Judahites would voluntarily and mysteriously transform themselves into race-mixed Jews is simply absurd. Nothing of the kind ever happened. Yet, this is what everybody believes, because this is what the Jews teach. Just as the Jews usurped the throne of the Czar of Russia 2,000 years later and just as the Neo-Kahns have usurped the government of the United States of America today. Once the Jews take over a nation, they proceed to rewrite its history so as to make themselves look good.

Max Dimont, himself a Jew, is absolutely correct about the devious nature of his ancestor and co-religionist, Antipater. Of course, Dimont does not whisper a word about the fact he carries the same blood as Antipater. Nor does he explain that it was these Idumeans who changed Mosaism into Talmudism. Somehow, the rabbis of deception say, Yahweh permitted His Law to be PERVERTED by the rabbis; and the rabbis are the teachers of this perversion. INCREDIBLE! Dimont, like his fellow purveyors of leaven, claims that this unbelievable transition had taken place under Ezra and Nehemiah. As a deceiving Jew himself, the Great Impersonation of Judah by Idumea must never be revealed. The Jews must always pretend that there is no ethnic or religious confusion here. They accomplish this by ignoring the Canaanite ancestry of their own people. They must always pretend to be Israel and Judah. Otherwise, their religious charade would be over and Christians would finally perceive them for the perfidious parasites they really are.

For the Jewish version of this history to be true, a very important question must be answered, namely: “How did the racially exclusive Levitical priesthood morph into the racially inclusive Pharisaical priesthood?”

Well, this never happened either, although everybody assumes it must have happened; otherwise, where would the Pharisees get their Mosaic authority from? The fact is that the Levitical priesthood was effectively outlawed during the Greek and Roman occupations of Judah; and because of this vacuum, the Judahite kings were forced to appoint non-Levitical men as High Priest. Three main factions vied for the priesthood during this time: the Essenes, the Sadducees and the Pharisees. Of these three, only the Essenes were totally loyal to the Law of Moses. The position of High Priest became a political football, being kicked from one faction to another, until finally, Herod appointed his Idumean subjects to the position. In a major act of insult to the Judahites, Herod even went so far as to import a Canaanite priest from Babylon, Anenalus, and gave him the High Priesthood. This is exactly the type of intrigue that the Jews don’t want you to know about, because these facts demonstrate very clearly that the Pharisees were a TOTALLY ILLEGITIMATE PRIESTHOOD. They were USURPERS, not heirs of the Levitical priesthood.

Herod establishes the Pharisees as the official, state priesthood.

As a result of the merging of Judah and Idumea, the sect known as the Pharisees became very powerful. They became the official State priesthood because they were supported by Herod, a non-Judahite Idumean who had effectively usurped the throne of Judah, having been installed by Rome. Just as Herod had usurped the throne of Judah, the Pharisees had usurped the priesthood of Judah. This is the historical reality that all Jews and Judeo-Christians do not want you to know.

Herod was the son of Antipater. It was Antipater’s plan all along to eventually place Herod on the throne of Judah. Josephus, in Book XIV, Chapter IX, Para. 4, tells us that the women of Judah were constantly agitating publicly against Herod while he shared power with Hyrcanus, demanding that Herod be put on trial for murdering the true Judahites of the land. Here is what Josephus tells us: “for when Herod had received the kingdom, he slew all the members of this [Judahite] Sandhedrin, and Hyrcanus himself also, excepting Sameas, for he had a great honor for him on account of his [presumed] righteousness [sic, the people trusted Sameas but it turned out that he was working in service to Herod], and because, when the city was afterwards besieged by Herod and Sosius, he persuaded the people to admit Herod into it.” (Sounds like Woodrow Wilson and Colonel House, Franklin Delano Rosenfeldt and Bernard Baruch, Nixon and Kissinger, George Bush and the Neo-Kahns, doesn’t it?) So, we can see that Herod had murdered the Judahite stock of the Sanhedrin, and the Judahite King John Hyrcanus participated in this treachery. One can see from this history that Hyrcanus was an extremely weak individual who did not perceive Idumean treachery for what it was! (Books XIII through XVII of Antiquities give us all the details of intrigue, assassinations, bribery, poisonings, etc., that plagued Judea at that time. All of these intrigues bear the unique, Jewish stamp of behind-the-scenes conniving, skullduggery and treachery, that True Israel blissfully ignores! As with the Bible, care has to be taken to read either “Judahites” or “Judeans” where the Josephus text renders “Jews,” because the translator, in this case William Whiston, makes no distinctions among them! At all costs, Christians are supposed to believe that these events are merely and INTERNAL STRUGGLE between and among Judahites. I as am demonstrating, the reality is that the Kingdom of Judah was being subjected to a very cleverly panned COUP by its worst enemy! This was SUBVERSION by an outside foe, not an internal dispute!)

Continuing with Josephus:

“Accordingly, when Hyrcanus came, full of assurance, by the permission of the King of Parthia, and at the expense of the Jews, who supplied him with money, Herod received him with all possible respect, and gave him the upper place at public meetings, and set him above all the rest at feasts, and thereby deceived him. [The Jews still employ these devious devices today in their dealings with Christian nations! The history of Zionism is absolute proof of this fact!] He called him his father, and endeavored, by all the ways possible, that he might have no suspicion of any treacherous design against him. He also did other things, in order to secure his government, which yet occasioned a sedition in his own family; for being cautious how he made any illustrious person [meaning a True Judahite] the high priest of God, he sent for an obscure priest out of Babylon, whose name was Ananelus, and bestowed the high priesthood upon him.” Antiquities of the Judahites, Book XV, Chapter II, Paragraph 4.

Here is where the Babylonian Connection comes in! The Babylonian Talmud is Babylonian precisely because it was a pagan importation from Babylon into the traditions of the Mosaic Law. It was in Babylon that this pagan priesthood had its main yeshiva (teaching center); and it was in Babylon, among other places, such as Pergamos, that the Babylonian Talmud was compiled.

Here is wisdom: The Babylonian Connection to Judaism came about during the days of Antipater and Herod, NOT during the days of Ezra and Nehemiah. Let that myth finally be laid to rest!

Unlike the Judeo-Christian churches of today, the early Church fathers understood that Herod was an Idumean and not a Judahite:

But as there had been kept in the archives up to that time the genealogies of the Hebrews as well as of those who traced their lineage back to proselytes, such as Achior the Ammonite and Ruth the Moabitess, and to those who were mingled with the Israelites and came out of Egypt with them, Herod, [Note this statement very carefully:] inasmuch as the lineage of the Israelites contributed nothing to his advantage, and since he was goaded with the consciousness of his own ignoble extraction [He was an Edomite Jew -- Eli], burned all the genealogical records, thinking that he might appear of noble origin if no one else were able, from the public registers, to trace back his lineage to the patriarchs or proselytes and to those mingled with them, who were called Georae. – from Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Ser. II, Vol. I, Eusebius: Church History; Life of Constantine, Oration in Praise of Constantine.

Now, the fact is that all Biblical scholars know very well that Herod was an Idumean, but none of them will point out the significance of this fact, because this is a very uncomfortable fact for the Jews to face or admit. How is it possible that an Idumean had become “King” of Judah? The fact is that Herod’s ascension to the throne was a coup staged by an enemy nation. It was not, in any way, a smooth transition from one Judahite king to another. By glossing over these historical details, all of these same historians fail to convey the fact that the nation of Judah had sustained a major political defeat. It was, in fact, an overthrow, not a continuation of the dynasty. The rabbis of Judaism do not want you to know that their priesthood was sponsored by a usurper. They want you to believe that Judaism is the legitimate heir of the teachings of Moses. They also want you to believe that race-mixing had become an accepted practice among the Judahites before the Pharisees arrived on the scene. If you know these historical facts, it is easy to see that the Herodian Pharisees were impostors from another country, pretending to be the legitimate priesthood of Judah. All four Gospels confirm this as a fact; but Christians don’t read their Bibles, so they don’t know these things. Lacking Scriptural truth, they believe Jewish fables.

“My people are destroyed, for lack of knowledge.” – Hosea 4:6.

So, the question, which is so often asked, “Who are the REAL Jews,” is a false question. The real Jews are the modern antichrists that we know today. The question that should be asked is: “Who are the REAL Judeans?” Or even better, “Who are the REAL Judahites?” The real Judahites are the blood descendants of the Tribe of Judah. No one else qualifies. And since the Jews are NOT blood descendants of the Tribe of Judah, the real Jews have always been that tribe of parasites, who have been deceiving the world with their lies for the last two thousand years. But since it is not possible to deceive the ELECT, we are not deceived; and we challenge the Jews to prove their Israelite heritage. WE can prove it and they cannot. That is the bottom line. We know it and they know it. And we also know that Yahweh is our side.

To us, Yahweh promises us eternal life; but to the Idumean deceivers, Yahweh promises desolation, even utter destruction, for their crimes against True Israel. We know who they are; and this is why they fear our Scriptural report, like a criminal who is about to be found out. It is about time that the rest of the Christian world wakes up to their charade.

Herod Assassinates John Hyrcanus

It was these Pharisees, a primarily Idumean sect with Babylonian/Canaanite traditions, who, during these pivotal times, displaced the depleted Levitical priesthood, which was an exclusively Judahite, not Jewish, priesthood. By adopting some Mosaic traditions but rejecting most, the Pharisees created the hybrid Babylonian/Mosaic religion known as Judaism, a religion which has, contrary to the Law of Moses, always preached race-mixing. They would proselytize anyone for a price. Yahshua puts it this way:

“Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees. Hypocrites! For ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves.” - Matt. 23:15.

The people of Judea, by the time of Christ, were a mixed people who had mixed feelings about the Pharisees, but the government of Herod promoted their sect as the State Religion, so few sects had more religious power than the Pharisees. If you will read the Gospels and the Epistles very carefully, you will see that the Pharisees are considered by Jesus and the Apostles to be the most evil people of Judea. If you are a Christian and you do not know this, it is because your Judeo-Christian pulpitmaster has kept this information from you. Essentially, modern Christianity has become nothing more than an infomercial for Judaism and Zionism.

Even though Hyrcanus had defeated the Idumeans militarily, he had actually fallen into the trap that was arranged by Herod’s father, Antipater, who had gained Julius Caesar’s consent to have Herod and Hyrcanus be co-regents. Thus, the Hyrcanus violation of the Law of Moses led to the usurpation of his own throne. Josephus puts it this way:

“The principal men of the Jews [sic, Judeans – Eli] came thither, to accuse Phasaelus [Herod’s Edomite brother] and Herod, and they said that Hyrcanus had indeed the appearance of reigning, but that these men [Phasaelus and Herod] had all the power.” (Antiquities, 14.12.2.) [Look at how the Zionists have taken control of America and you will see that we are in exactly the same position today. Our Presidents have the illusion of power, but the International Jew reigns behind the scenes.]

At 14.16.3, Josephus informs us that Herod brought his own people (Idumeans) into Jerusalem to run the government: “And now Herod having overcome his enemies, his care was to govern those FOREIGNERS WHO HAD BEEN HIS ASSISTANTS, FOR THE CROWD OF STRANGERS RUSHED TO SEE THE TEMPLE, AND THE SACRED THINGS IN THE TEMPLE…” (Recall Lam. 1:10.) These “foreigners,” being his assistants and acquaintances from Idumea, were to become the new government of Judah. Evidently, these Idumeans had for many centuries wanted to enter the Holy of Holies, which had always been forbidden to them because they were not Israelites. Thus, under Herod, the Pharisaic priesthood, comprised mainly of his Idumean friends, became the official priesthood of Judea.

After Herod had usurped the throne, he proceeded to attack the Judahite priesthood. First, he murdered Aristobulus (15.3.3). He then vowed to murder Hyrcanus (15.6.2).

Having been deposed by Herod, John Hyrcanus had sought the help of the Parthians, who were then at war with the Romans. Since Herod was Rome’s agent, word of this alliance caused Herod to determine to kill Hyrcanus.

Josephus tells us:

“As for Herod himself, he saw that there was no one of royal dignity left but Hyrcanus, and therefore he thought it would be for his advantage not to suffer him to be an obstacle in his way any longer…” (15.6.1)

John Hyrcanus made one last attempt to regain the throne from Herod. In this attempt, he was hoping to receive reinforcements of cavalrymen from Arabia; and he sent a courier named Dositheus with a letter to the governor of Arabia. However, Dositheus betrayed Hyrcanus and delivered the letter to Herod instead.

“Now, as soon as Herod had received this letter, he immediately sent for Hyrcanus, and questioned him about the league he had made with Malchus; and when he denied it, he showed the letter to the Sanhedrim, and put the man to death immediately.” (15.6.2)

Thus Hyrcanus died trying to regain the throne for Judah.

It is worthwhile to read Josephus’s brief account of Hyrcanus’s life, in which Hyrcanus’s mild character is contrasted with that of Herod:

“And this was the fate of Hyrcanus; and thus did he end his life, after he had endured various and manifold turns of fortune in his lifetime; for he was made high priest of the Jewish [sic: Judahite] nation in the beginning of his mother Alexandra’s reign, who held the government nine years; and when, after his mother’s death, he took the kingdom himself, and held it three months, he lost it, by means of his brother Aristobulus. He was then restored by Pompey, and received all sorts of honor from him, and enjoyed them forty years; but when he was again deprived by Antigonus, and was maimed in his body, he was made a captive by the Parthians, and thence returned home again after some time, on account of the hopes that Herod had given him; none of which came to pass according to his expectation [because Herod was setting a trap for him in order to kill him!]; but he still conflicted with many misfortunes through the whole course of his life: and, what was the heaviest calamity of all, as we have already related, he came to an end which was undeserved by him. His character appeared to be that of a man of mild and moderate disposition, who suffered the administration of affairs to be generally done by others under him. He was averse to much meddling with the public, nor had shrewdness enough to govern a kingdom: and both Antipater and Herod came to their greatness by reason of his mildness; and at last he met with such an end from them as was not agreeable either to justice or piety.” (15.6.4)

In other words, another mild-mannered Israelite was manipulated and destroyed by Edomite Jews!!!! How many times has this happened to our Israelite people? Czar Nicholas II was of the same mild character. He was no match for the Rothschilds and the butchers of Bolshevism.

After Herod slew Hyrcanus, he then murdered his own Judahite wife, Mariamne, because she had discovered what a monster Herod really was; and she was making her own plans to depose him (15.7.3). Then he made Costobarus, an Idumean, governor of Idumea and Gaza (15.7.9), eventually putting all of the dynasty of Hyrcanus to death and undermining the Mosaic Law (15.7.10), instituting, via the Pharisees, Babylonian and Roman customs (15.8.3; 15.9.5).

While Antigonus, the Judahite, was for a time co-regent with Herod, Herod had connived to have him put in prison by Mark Antony. But Herod was afraid that Mark Antony would release the true, Judahite heir to the throne of Judah. Having worked so hard to overthrow the true Judahite dynasty, Herod had no option but to murder Antigonus. Here is what Josephus records:

“Out of Herod’s fear of this it was that he, by giving Antony a great deal of money, endeavored to persuade him to have Antigonus slain, which, if it were once done, he should be free from that fear. And thus did the government of the Asmoneans [the Judahite dynasty] cease, a hundred and twenty-six years after it was first set up.” (14.16.4)

Josephus then praises this dynasty for the nobility of their racial stock and then proceeds to lament the fact that the dynasty was undone by the machinations of Herod and Antipater. These two he describes as being of “no more than a vulgar family and of no eminent extraction [meaning non-Judahites], but one that was subject to other kings.” (14.16.4.) What other kings? The Dukes of Edom! That’s who! Herod, once fully established as Governor of Judea by Rome, proceeded to place his Edomite kinsmen in positions of political and religious authority. This was how the Pharisees came to displace the Levites of Judah. (And this is exactly how the Jews have taken over America. By infiltrating all positions of power, they see to it that only Jews or their Shabbez goy hirelings are in authority. The average Christian is utterly clueless about this usurpation. They actually believe that the Jews are our “friends.”)

Thus consolidating the usurpation of Judah by the Idumeans, Herod turned the tables on the House of Judah, just a few years after Hyrcanus gloried in his military victory over the Idumeans. By absorbing the Idumeans into their land, the Judahites unwittingly absorbed the parasitic cancer that would eventually destroy the Kingdom of Judah. Like the Russians who would later absorb the Khazar Jews into Russia with a military victory, the Khazar Jews never ceased to connive and sabotage Christian Russia until they eventually defeated Russia from within. This was the Bolshevik coup.

It can be said without fear of contradiction, that whenever Israelites allow Jews into their nations, the Jews never fail to subvert and destroy those nations. Lacking the subtlety and animus that the Jews possess against us, our people never grasp the fact that the Jews have always been and will always be our worst enemies. They are not our brothers. They are the children of the devil, as Jesus Christ Himself explained to us on many occasions. Now, it is up to us to stop associating with these devils, for everything they touch turns into disease and disaster for us. They feed off of us as they are now feeding off the Christian Zionists, who are going to experience the same betrayal that Hyrcanus and Czar Nicholas II experienced at the hands of the antichrist Jews.

Conclusion

The perceptive reader will understand that Judaism is actually the Replacement Theology, for it replaces Judahites and Israelites with Edomite Jews and it replaces the Mosaic Law with the Talmud, the “tradition of the elders,” as Yahshua Messiah called it.

The key to understanding the Jewish impersonation of Judah is to understand that the Jews, as led by the scribes and Pharisees, originated in Edom, not in Judah. Both racially and culturally, the Edomite Jew is the impersonator of Judah and Israel. Until our people understand this, there will forever be confusion between these two entirely disparate groups of people. (Contrary to the popular Jewish myth, Christianity does not owe its origins to Judaism. On the contrary, Christianity is the religion of the New Covenant of Israel, the legitimate heir of the Mosaic tradition. Judaism is an impostor and a usurper. In fact, Judaism represents all things antagonistic to Mosaism and Christianity.)

It is here worthwhile to recall the prophecy of Ezekiel:

“Therefore, thus saith Yahweh Elohim; Surely in the fire of my jealousy have I spoken against the residue of the heathen, AND AGAINST ALL IDUMEA, WHICH HAVE APPOINTED MY LAND INTO THEIR POSSESSION WITH THE JOY OF ALL THEIR HEART, WITH DESPITEFUL MINDS, TO CAST IT OUT FOR A PREY.” - Ezek. 36:5.

Who controls Palestine today? Those spiteful Edomite and Khazar Jews, who say they are Judah, and are not, but do lie!

It is very important to understand that the vast majority of the translations of our original literature, from both the Hebrew and Greek, fail to differentiate between the Judahites and the Idumeans. This is also true of the William Whiston translation of Josephus. But once you understand that the Idumeans are in fact the enemies of the Judahites, then it is easy to keep them distinct, in spite of the fact that virtually all current literature obscures these ethnic differences by referring to both groups as “Jews.” As the song says, “You’ve got to keep them separated.”

I hope I have provided you with a sound basis for always discriminating between Jews and Judahites. There is never a valid reason to suppose that the two groups can be considered to be the same people. Without this understanding, it is impossible to comprehend the fact that True Judah is being impersonated by a bunch of Christ-hating Jews, who are NOT the relatives of our Messiah. On the contrary, they are the descendants of Cain, the murderer of Abel. Once the true identity of the impersonator is revealed, only then can the Bible be understood. Without an awareness of this Great Impersonation, reading the Bible is very confusing, as many, many witnesses have attested.

The Informed Consensus

Judahites ------------------------------------------------------- Jews

Never called “Jews” -------------------------------- Always called “Jews”

Racially exclusive ------------------------------------ Thoroughly mongrelized

Law of Moses ---------------------------------------- Tradition of the Elders (Talmud)

Patrilineal Descent ---------------------------------- Matrilineal Descent (Edomite tradition)

Accepted the Messiah ------------------------------ Murdered the Messiah

Given these diametrically opposite cultural traits, how can we use the same word, ‘Jew,’ to designate both groups? It’s like using the word “Black” to mean both “White” and Black.” And, given the fact that the Judahites and the Edomites/Canaanites had always been enemies, how can we equate them by using a single word, which totally obscures their racial, cultural, and religious enmity? This dual usage of the word ‘Jew’ is completely absurd. Obviously, the Jews come from a completely different racial stock and from a completely different religious tradition, namely, Canaanite paganism.

But, of course, the rabbis don’t want you to pay attention to these vary real distinctions. They just want you to keep using the word ‘Jew’ as if it actually applies to BOTH of these unrelated groups: Hook-nosed Kikes and Shemitic Aryans, i.e, Anglo-Saxon Israel.

Confusing? It’s supposed to be confusing. Did you ever see the movie, “Twins,” with Arnold Schwarzenegger and Danny DiVito playing the “twins”? If these guys are twins, I’m a monkey’s uncle!!! The Jews are hoping you will never figure this out, because these are the very historical and religious facts that are obscured by the incorrect usage of the word ‘Jew.”

Rules of The Consensus:

#1. Never refer to a Judahite as a Jew. Never refer to JESUS as a Jew!!! A Jew is one who pretends to be a Judahite. The pretender can never be the real thing.

#2. Never refer to Judaism as the religion of the Old Testament.

#3. Never accept as Jew as an Israelite. They are not the same.

#4. Never accept a Jew as a Shemite. Khazars and Sephardics are not Shemites.

#5. Never accept a Jew as a Hebrew. They are not the same.

#6. Never accept a Jew as an Adamite/Aryan.

#7. Never accept Judaism as the “predecessor” of Christianity. Judaism is, in thousands of ways, and in every possible way, the distortion, denial, and the debauchery of the Law of Moses, the very opposite of the Law of Moses. Read the Talmud for yourself, if you don’t believe me.

#8. Never, never, never, confuse an Israeli with an Israelite. They are NOT the same!!!!

Therefore, we must NEVER apply the word Jew to a Judahite. To do so is an insult to a Judahite or an Israelite.

Since the Judahites were ALWAYS racially segregated, Mosaic Law practicing, patrilineal descendants of the Tribe of Judah, how can the Judahites possibly be equated with a thoroughly mongrelized, matrilineal, Talmud practicing bunch of Khazars?

It doesn’t make any sense to use one word to denote two opposites. These opposites must always be understood as separate categories of human being: Judahites and Jews. Let today mark the end of the historical confusion the rabbis have wrought. Down with Judaism! Down with Judeo-Christianity!

The True Islamic Monotheism

" By various obvious
criteria-universalism,scripturalism,spiritual
egalitarianism , the extension of full participation
in the sacred community not to one, or some ,but to
all , and the rational systematisation of social life
- Islam is, of the three great Western monotheisms,
the one closest to modernity."

( Ernest Gellner : Muslim Society - Cambridge
university Press,1981.p.7)

" From a human point of view the Qur'an looks like a
miraculous achievement of sublime artistry. In any
event, being written down so rapidly during the
lifetime of Muhammad, and pretty much consistent in
its teachings and prescriptions , it has not created
the problems encountered in looking at the New
Testament , which came into being through different
hands over a much longer period , and has undergone
great editing."

( Ninian Smart : The World's Religions - Old
Traditions and Modern Transformations - Cambridge
University Press,1992.p.281)

" The religious influence it(Qur'an) exercises as
the basis of Islam and the final authority in matters
spiritual and ethical is only one side of the story.
Theology, jurisprudence and science being considered
by Moslems as different aspects of one and the same
thing, the Koran becomes the scientific manual , the
textbook, for acquiring a liberal education."

( Philip K. Hitti : History of the Arabs- Macmillan
Education Ltd.,London, tenth edition,1970.p.127)

" Christianity ,in short, is not a law-centred
religion. Islam, for all its liberalisation,
unmistakably remains one, and in this it is supported
by the legal content of the Koran."

(Michael Cook : Muhammad - Oxford University
Press.1983.p.331)

" A Muslim Europe would have saved Hegel from the
need to indulge in most painfully tortuous arguments
in order to explain how an earlier faith,Christianity
, nevertheless is more final and absolute than a
chronologically later one,namely Islam. ( In fact he
did it by invoking the fact that Europe was only
Christianised at the time of Charlemagne, who is at
least suitably posterior to Muhammad). Had Islam,
the later and by some plausible criteria purer faith,
prevailed, no such problem would have arisen for a
Muslim Hegel."

( Charles Taylor, Hegel , Cambridge ,1975.p.492)

*** exposing the hidden truth for further educational research only *** CAVEAT LECTOR ***

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. NOTE: Some links may require cut and paste into your Internet Browser.

Please check http://tinyurl.com/33c9yr http://groups.google.com/group/total_truth_sciences/topics?gvc=2 for more real news posts and support the truth! (sorry but don't have time to email all posts)

free book download: http://www.lulu.com/content/165077 or http://www.lulu.com/items/volume_63/165000/165077/21/print/165077.pdf

http://blogs.albawaba.com/alexanderjames http://blogs.albawaba.com/Alexanderjames/page/links http://bb.domaindlx.com/alexjames999

*** Revealing the hidden Truth For Educational & Further Research Purposes only. *** Welcome to Real News Edited excerpts, non-partisan, pro-truth-honesty-peace, and anti-war-lies-crime. The purpose is to expose corruptions, frauds, deceptions, lies, criminal plans, cover-ups and free-speech silencing by powerful people in governments, foundations, corporations and media, which are done using the name of democracy, human rights, false interpretations of religions, cults, occults, patriotism, economy, business, media, elections, justice, charity, etc., and are used to trick the public into hatred & wars and out of their lives, money and freedoms, while the propaganda we are subjected to makes us believe that we have evolved to where such things cannot happen [remember slavery, apartheid…]. Please share what you learn with others who do not have access to the internet. This is only a tip of the iceberg. Stop the hatred that is used to promote the dehumanization of the victims of predatory aggressions;spread the truth;free your mind from being a Zioncon occupied territory of the neo-feudal lords by rejecting the mainstream news propaganda. Caution: real news may induce a kind of schizophrenia because it provides a true vision of reality which is so different from the one we are presented by the mass media spins. Latest real infonews available at alternate news. ***** Check whatreallyhappened.com, inforwars.com, whtt.org, savethemales.ca & other alternative news sites for latest news flashes. In Truth We Trust! The opinions expressed herein contain positions and viewpoints that are not necessarily those of the recipient, disseminator or others mentioned in the information. These are offered as a means to stimulate dialogue and discussion.

NOTICE: Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the National Security Agency (NSA) may have read emails without warning, warrant, or notice. They may do this without any judicial or legislative oversight. You have no recourse, nor protection.......... IF anyone other than the addressee of this e-mail is reading it, you are in violation of the 1st & 4th Amendments to the Constitution of the United States. Patriot Act 5 & H.R. 1955 Disclaimer Notice: This post & all my past & future posts represent parody & satire & are all intended for entertainment and amusement only.