DR JOHN WILSON IS IN JAIL 9th September 2008 - NOTICE TO VACATE. It's D-DAY, Down Under Sausage Sizzle With John Wilson

Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly versionSend to friendSend to friend

Video Of John Wilson Being Arrested - A Current Affairs Channel 9 Sydney 11th September 2008 - Look For The one That Says Home Eviction - The scary story of how one mans house was repossessed by his own bank 5 Minutes

Click Here For The Latest John Wilson Updates & Comments From The Take Back Your Home Website - (sanitised)

John Wilsons Website RightsAndWrong.com.au

Latest Posting From John Wilson 18th September 2008

The Office of the Sheriff,
Burwood Court House,
7-9 Belmore Street,
Burwood,
NSW 2134,
Australia.
Email to: burwoodsheriff@agd.nsw.gov.au

Dear Fellow Australians,

Next Tuesday, 23rd September 2008, your honour, your loyalty to your country, and your love for your neighbour as yourself, will be put to the test....because I will be at the Burwood Local Court for a C.A.N. H34747114 (Court Attendance Notice) that has 6 "Arrest Warrants" against me....all of which are false because they have been issued by the "Magistrates" of various "Courts" which can only be described as "Kangaroo Courts" because they were conducted by "Magistrates" who disregarded my legal right to Trial by Jury and disregarded the legal procedure of my Challenging the Jurisdiction of the Court. The awards, doings and proceedings of such "Courts" are not to be drawn into consequence or example, ie: they are illegal and void.....however, in order for the Banks and the Judges to continue to steal and destroy the laws and liberties of the People, they rely upon the Sheriffs to enforce their tyranny.

The "Judges" and Magistrates" are the ones concealing the Truth. They are the ones protecting the criminal practices of the Banks. They are the ones perverting the Course of Justice. They are the enemies of Liberty....and they can't do it without your help...without your "just following orders".

On Tuesday, I will, of course, Challenge the Jurisdiction of the Court because I have been denied my inalienable Right to Trial by Jury. Will you carry out the expected orders from the "Magistrate" to arrest me and deliver me to the Corrective Services to be imprisoned...or will you honour your sworn duty to ensure that People can exercise their Rights in Court in safety? The "Magistrate" will clearly commit the heinous offence of denying me Trial by Jury which is, in fact, Treason because Trial by Jury is Democracy.

From your own website, your "Mission" is "to protect the New South Wales justice system" ...Justice being "the protection of rights and the punishment of wrongs".

From your own website, your "Vision" is that "all participants in the judicial system can access their rights in safety; the public trusts the integrity of the jury system; the community is confident that the orders of the course deliver justice; and our people are well trained and highly motivated to achieve our Mission".

From your own website, your "Values" are "Leadership: we are responsible for our actions & allow our people to excel. Integrity: we act in the interests of justice and our Code of Conduct, without fear or favour. Accountability: we keep true records, give reasons for our actions and communicate clearly. Innovation: continually review & improve the way we work, understanding our strengths and weaknesses. Safety: we understand and actively manage the risks we face".

The Sheriff is "the chief officer of the Crown". The Crown is Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland who has sworn to govern and protect the People of Australia in her Coronation Oath.

A plaque at the Magna Carta Monument in Canberra's Parliamentary Triangle says, "Magna carta is now seen as a traditional mandate for trial by jury, justice for all, accountable government and no arbitrary imprisonment".Trial by Jury is described as "the glory of English law"; "the Palladium of Liberty"; "the Bulwark of Freedom", and "the only defence against Tyranny". Your own website has booklets extolling the importance of Trial by Jury.

How will you act on Tuesday when a "Magistrate" in the Burwood Local Court does what all "Magistrates" and "Judges" in Australia now do, ie: deny that the People have the Right to Trial by Jury?

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
http://www.rightsandwrong.com.au
PS: Contact details for Sheriffs throughout NSW can be found on http://www.sheriff.nsw.gov.au/lawlink/local_courts/ll_localcourts.nsf/pa...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posting From John Wilson 14th September 2008

MORE EVIL THAN TREASON:

Dear Friends in Liberty,
“And this occurred because of false brethren secretly brought in (who came in by stealth to spy out our liberty which we have in Christ Jesus, that they might bring us into bondage),” (Galatians 2:4)

If we are to be free, we must apply the Rule of Law which is “1. The supremacy of law. 2. A feature attributed to the UK constitution by Professor Dicey (Law of the Constitution, 1885). It embodied three concepts: the absolute predominance of regular law, so that the government has no arbitrary authority over the citizen; the equal subjection of all (including officials) to the ordinary law administered by the ordinary courts; and the fact that the citizen’s personal freedoms are formulated and protected by the ordinary law rather than by abstract constitutional declarations.”

All law, in fact, hangs on loving God and loving your neighbour as yourself (Matthew 22: 35 – 40).

God has sovereignty over all People and God has given We the People a second level sovereignty that demands we protect ourselves, our families, our friends, our neighbours, our country, and our world. Sovereignty is “the ultimate authority to make and impose laws”. People exercise this sovereignty through the unanimous judgments of Juries, who are gatherings of 12 Freemen who ask, "So help me God", in order for them to administer Justice… and Justice is "the protection of rights and the punishment of wrongs". Trial by Jury is Democracy.

Treason, itself, is the violation of allegiance to one's country. But infinitely more evil than simple Treason, is the deprivation of our connection to God that is established when Freemen call upon God to help make and impose Common Law.

Thomas Jefferson said he "I believe trial by jury is the only anchor yet imagined by man that can hold a government to the principles of its constitution". And, I believe that applies to every country in the world. I truly believe that Tyranny can only be defeated by People exercising their Right to Trial by Jury...their Right to ask "So help me God".

I believe that it is a just cause to fight for the domestic and international categorical imperative of Trial by Jury. My working as a dentist has until now, funded this campaign. Now the Banks and the Judges have destroyed that livelihood. They have unlawfully dispossessed me of my dental practice and unlawfully declaring me bankrupt. By the Judges denying me the Right to Trial by Jury, my claims for damages against the Crown that would fund the fight have been struck out.

I have no choice but to ask for financial support to continue this fight. In the past, I have asked several prominent Australian businessmen for donations...but without success. I have no access to my bank accounts....and ask that contributions be sent to my wife's bank account, the details for which are:

Account holder: Laraine Wilson.

BSB - 032282

CAN - 126213

The American Fully Informed Jury Association (www.FIJA.org) was set up by Mr Larry Dodge to foster support for Trial by Jury to protect their Constitutional Rights in that country. He did it by raising funds from patriotic American businessmen. My efforts in Australia have now been crushed by the "evil counsellors, judges and ministers who subvert and extirpate the laws and liberties of the people" (Bill of Rights 1688).

This is War between the Banks and the People. I want the People to win.

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
14th September 2008.
http://www.rightsandwrong.com.au
19 Elm Place, North Rocks, NSW 2151, Australia.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

John Wilson Update Provided By John Wilson (includes a link to video of what happened) 12th September 2008

Dear Fellow Australians,

Tuesday 9 September 2008, North Rocks, Australia.

Channel 9 broadcast this story on their "A Current Affair" program... http://video.msn.com/?mkt=en-au&brand=ninemsn&tab=m164 It's the one called "Home Eviction".

The "Notice to Vacate" was acted upon by the Sheriff's Officers. Sheriff Inspector Shane Flexman formally handed the property to a representative of Australia's biggest firm of real estate agent, L/J.Hooker, and the little person instructed the NSW Police Force to arrest me for "trespassing". I was taken to the "Dock" at the Castle Hill Police Station, held for 10 hours and then transferred to Parramatta Police Station cells....handcuffs, etc. At 4:45 AM woken for a bowl of rice bubbles and milk. Transferred to the cells of the Parramatta Court at 10:00 AM. 11:45 AM taken into Court and given bail. Released 1 hour 30 minutes later.

On Thursday 11 September 2008, I went to the NSW Supreme Court where I had, the previous week, filed a Challenge to the Jurisdiction of the Court. Justice Rothman disregarded the legal procedure and had me imprisoned in the cells "until the Court rises" and I was escorted out of the building at 1:15 PM.

Today, Friday 12 September 2008, I accompanied Ray Lovett to the NSW Supreme Court where he had filed a Summons against the Sheriff of NSW for the assault on him on 22 February that hospitalising him. In June, Justice Kirby had denied Ray his Right to Trial by Jury. Today Justice Rothman disregarded Ray's statements of "I have not consented to be without a Jury." , "This Court has no Jurisdiction to proceed summarily." and "I Challenge the Jurisdiction of the Court." Justice Rothman then dismissed Ray's Summons and awarded costs against Ray.

This coming Monday 15 September 2008, I will be in the NSW Supreme Court for the Summons I have filed against the State of New South Wales for "Unlawful Imprisonment" because the Arrest warrant for when I was arrested and imprisoned on 20 August 2008 read that "Reasons for Arrest" that I had "Failed to appear at Burwood local Court on July 30 2008" when, in fact, I did attend and have the transcript of me arguing with Magistrate Dakin and him having me removed by the Sheriffs.

This coming Monday, I expect the usual Kangaroo Court routine of a Judge disregarding the legal right of Trial by Jury, disregarding the legal procedure of a Challenge to the Jurisdiction of the Court, and then the dismissal of the Indictment.

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.

---------------------

John Wilson Update Provided By (sanitised) 11th September 2008

Hi Everyone,

Just a quick update on John Wilson, following his arrest on Tuesday, September 9th, 2008.

John was held in by the Castle Hill Police until being transported the following day to Parramatta Court. We don’t have the entire details yet, but we understand the matter is not yet closed.

We are told that a representative from LJ Hooker told the Police to arrest John Wilson for Trespass. What a joke! The Sheriff had only just arrived on John Wilsons property and the locksmiths had only just started changing the locks. Normally people are given 20 mins or so to collect their personal belongings etc.

If this is true about LJ Hooker ordering John’s arrest, then they are just as bad as Homeway First National Real Estate, possibly worse!

LJ Hooker you’re the best. NOT!!!!!

Real Estate agents and Police are working against the public in these matters. The Police should have nothing to do with possession orders, unless there is a reported disturbance of the peace. Clearly, this never happened, so why did 14 Castle Hill Police offices arrive at the scene?

Today, in the Hills Shire Times, the entire front page is dedicated to Castle Hill Police station being dreadfully low on Staff numbers, yet they send out 14 officers to assist the Sheriff to take possession of a home! They can’t be this short staffed to allow this many officers to these matters, considering it has nothing to do with the Police (Cival Matter).

We know they really are short staffed, and Sgt Andrew Ryabovitch told me personally (concerning our own matter), when Gaden’s Lawyers tried to get them involved in our repossession, “this has nothing to do with the Police, it is a Cival Matter”. This just goes to show what power the banks have over our law enforcement agencies.

We believe John is waiting on a new internet connection, so stay tuned for an update from the man himself.

Sincerely,
(sanitised)

------------------------------------

John Wilson Update 9th September 2008

This evening we received this email regarding John Wilson being in Jail again. Including what is generously being offered by (sanitised) see below you can also post your comments to the Love For Life Website here: http://www.loveforlife.com.au/node/5367

We will do everything we can to spread this news all over the globe and support an action to help free John and bring to account everyone involved and responsible for this terrorist attack.

Conscious Love Always
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
action @ loveforlife.com.au
www.loveforlife.com.au

-------------------

9th September 2008

John Wilson Arrested

Taken from (sanitised) Website Take Back Your Home

Dear Readers
Today, we attended a morning tea BBQ at John Wilson’s dental surgery North Rocks. It was a great time getting to meet other people (probably 30 - 40 in total), who have had wrongs done to them by the Australian Banking system, the Courts and the law enforcement agencies.

Local television reporters came along to see what was going on, and interview most of the people present. Everyone had a story to tell. There was even one guy, who had been put in prison for 14 days, for wearing a tee shirt that has the words “Trial By Jury is Democracy”. I don’t know about you, but what is the crime in wearing a tee shirt that states the obvious? Perhaps there was more to it, but it sounds like this message is not appreciated by the Judges in our Courts.

At around 10.30am, we needed to get going, so we got on with out day. We did see a large Police van drive past just before leaving, and put it down to being a coincidence.

At or around midday, we are told that approximately 14 Police officers (3-4 being TAG Officers), 2 Sheriffs and 4 “helpers” arrived at the 331 North Rocks Rd, North Rocks address. The television film crew had already left the premises, but luckily, three other people had video camera’s handy and caught the whole event on film!

So our question and everyone else who attended this peaceful meeting today, is why was all of those Police and Sheriffs required to take possession of a home? There was no disturbance of the peace taking place. Why was John arrested?

The same thing happened to us on Thursday, August 14th, 2008 at 7.30am (three Police officers arrived), but we had a Stay of Writ in place. The Bank and Sheriff forgot to tell the Castle Hill Police about this. It seems that the Banks feel they can get the Police in Civil matters, and basically waste their time. We already have a shortage of good Police Officers, don’t we?

We are not sure what John has been charged with as yet. Tonight, we called Castle Hill Police to find out if he could be released. The person who answered the phone, Jill, informed us that he been refused bail, and would be attending Parramatta Court at 9.30am tomorrow (Wednesday, September 10th, 2008).

As we find out more, we will let you all know.

Sincerely,
(sanitised)

--------------------------------

9th September 2008

Original email received from (sanitised)

Dear People,
Its (sanitised) here, touching base about the events that have transpired today.

Today, we attended a morning tea put on by John Wilson, to celebrate democracy. It was a peaceful meeting with like minded people, who basically share a common point of view, to stop the banks doing wrong by the people.

I had to leave at about 10.30am. At or around midday today, I am told that approximately 14 Police officers (3-4 TAG Officers), 2 Sheriff’s and 4 helpers arrived at 331 North Rocks Rd, North Rocks, with the intention of taking possession of this property. We are still a little sketchy on the details, but have put a post up on the website http://takebackyourhome.com.au and we know that some of you receiving this email would have been on the property once all this took place.

Please make sure you put your own comments on the web site under the post by clicking on the comments link – under the post at http://takebackyourhome.com.au/latestposts/john-wilson-arrested

The question we have is why was it necessary for the Police to be there anyway? There was no disturbance of the peace, so why involve the Police?

Tonight, I have called Castle Hill Police (our local station) to see if we could get John out. The person I spoke to, Jill, said that Bail has been refused and that John will be appearing in Parramatta Court at 9.30am tomorrow morning (Wednesday, September 10th, 2008).

Regrettably, it is not possible for me to be there, but if anyone else can make it to show your support, I know John would appreciate it.

For those who can, please pray for John’s family that they will be safe and well looked after.

Now that First Mac http://www.firstmac.com.au have John’s property, there will be no place for John to run his business (for the time being). I have left a message to let her know we will support her and the family in any way possible.

While I don’t want to predict the worst, it sounded like the law enforces intend to keep John locked up for as long as possible. Regardless of your religious beliefs, we need to be reminded that most of the New Testament Bible was written by Paul, during his frequent stays in prison, and it was from this place, where many of his letters of encouragement went out to the people and helped to strengthen the believers!

That’s something for the law enforcement agencies to consider! When you lock up a good man, he will have time to think and get this message out to the masses.

For anyone who is prepared to do some practical acts of kindness for John’s family, please write back. It could even be just to include some additional items in your shopping so we can help John’s wife with stocking up on grocery items and non perishable foods etc. We all know that John has been fighting hard for this cause for many years, so let’s show our appreciation by helping his family.

We need to remember that John’s wife will be feeling all alone right now. Based on previous conversations with John’s wife, I know she would appreciate NOT being called by everyone, so please respect her wishes. (sanitised) and I will happily coordinate delivery of these items to John’s family.

Sincerely,
(sanitised)
www.TakeBackYourHome.com.au

-------------------------------------------------------------

8th September 2008

From John Wilson

Dear Fellow Australians,

Tomorrow morning.....starting at 08:00 hrs....331 North Rocks Road, North Rocks, Sydney, NSW 2151, Australia.

A "Sausage Sizzle" to celebrate Truth, Justice, Freedom and Democracy.

A celebration of the Spirit of the Eureka Stockade....the Beacon of Democracy.

We the People are sovereign human beings and have the inalienable Right to Trial by Jury...the lawful judgment of our equals.

We cannot be taken or imprisoned, nor suffer trespass, nor be dispossessed, nor punished unless by the lawful judgment of our equals.

Bank loans with variable interest rates are fraud.

Foreclosures and Writs of Possession are illegal unless by the lawful judgment of our equals.

Bankers and Judges MUST be brought under the Rule of Law.

Tomorrow morning....starting at 08:00 hrs....331 North Rocks road, North Rocks, Sydney, NSW 2151, Australia.

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
http://www.rightsandwrong.com.au

----------------------------------------------------------

6th September 2008

Dear Fellow Australians,

An emailers suggestion that Tuesday's Sausage Sizzle should be called "E-DAY" is a good one. I described the EUREKA STOCKADE as the BEACON OF DEMOCRACY because that's exactly what it is....when ordinary men made a stand for the Rights and 6 separate Juries of their equals judged them to have NOT DONE WRONG and NOT GUILTY of the charge of HIGH TREASON for which the British Governor of Victoria wanted the Men hung by their neck until dead. This chapter in our history is of crucial importance and must be learnt by all Australians. It is commemorated and incorporated into the MAGNA CARTA MONUMENT in Canberra's Parliamentary gardens..and is a MUST VISIT.

I've brought the barbeque up to 331 North Rocks Road, North Rocks, NSW 2151 with some tables and chairs, etc. There is be sausages, onions, sauces, bread, coffee, tea, cordial, etc. Starting at 8:00AM

Ordinary decent Australians...men and women...will be there helping - not only with the cooking, but, more importantly talking to each other and learning from each other.

The Sheriffs have "served" me with a "NOTICE TO VACATE" for 9:30 AM on Tuesday 9 September 2008...a "NOTICE" will ridiculous because it is flawed in every possible way. I have filed a NOTICE OF MOTION plus a CHALLENGE TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE COURT in the NSW Supreme Court which is listed before the Court on 11th September 2008 at 9:00AM...also the TITLE SEARCH on 4 September 2008 shows my name only in the "FIRST SCHEDULE". This information I have handed into the Parramatta Sheriff's Office, yesterday. And so, the Sheriff may or may not show up ... they keep on saying "I am just doing my job.", ie: I am just following orders."

Indeed, they are most welcome....because they have to realize that their primary and paramount duty is "to ensure that people can exercise their rights in court in safety" (as it is written in their own website).

We must recruit them on OUR SIDE...the SIDE OF RIGHT.

I will have a new banner saying "TRUTH JUSTICE FREEDOM DEMOCRACY" to go with the "COMMON LAW RIGHTS GROUP" one. There will be green and gold balloons ...and we will TOAST THE MAGNA CARTA with tea and coffee.

Oh, if only I had some money to fund a travelling unit to visit Australian cities and towns....and repeat this format...if only.

Yours sincerely
John Wilson
http://www.rightsandwrong.com.au

----------------------------------------------------------

5th September 2008

Dear Fellow Australians,
Here is the rough footage of the video taken last Monday of the local Sheriffs delivering the unlawful "NOTICE TO VACATE".

Video: Local Sheriffs Delivering The Unlawful "NOTICE TO VACATE" 3 Minutes 40 Seconds

Yesterday I filed a NOTICE OF MOTION and CHALLENGE TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE COURT. Immediately there is the legal procedure of a Challenge to the Jurisdiction, there is a peremptory, mandatory and absolute Stay of Proceedings until the jurisdiction has been determined by a Special Jury.

However, in Australia, the Rule of Law has been thrown out the window by the Banks and the Judges. The definition of a kangaroo court is "a court which acts unfairly or dishonestly or disregards legal procedures". Our inalienable right to trial by jury is disregarded everytime we go to court....and everytime I challenge the jurisdiction of the court, that is disregarded.

Why? Because, when the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth is told to a fully infromed Jury, the Banksters and Judges will be imprisoned for many, many years.

Also yesterday, a TITLE SEARCH of my property at the Department of Lands shows only my name in the FIRST SCHEDULE.

The counsellors, judges and ministers are not simply evil, they are quite stupid.

They have lost...but, what do really bad and stupid buggers do when they know they have been beaten?

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
http://www.rightsandwrong.com.au
PS: I am just about to go into Parramatta to deliver a letter, with copied documents of the above material, to the Sheriff.
PPS: The Good Book says the truth will make us free.
PPPS: Next Tuesday's Sausage Sizzle is still very much ON.

-------------------------------------------------------------

5th September 2008

Inspector Shane Flexman,
Parramatta Sheriff's Office,
Marsden Road,
Parramatta,
NSW 2150.
Email to: parramattasheriff @ agd.nsw.gov.au

Dear Shane,

Here is a copy-n-paste of an email I have just received:

If you folk think you have it bad take a bearing on the poor Aussies who are having their homes stolen through the collusion of the banksters, judges, and sheriffs.

Dr Wilson has the answer that the thieves are ignoring and that is the common law and the fact that a variable rate of interest loan is a fraud because as Dr Wilson states, the interest rate has to be certain to avoid fraudulent conveyance. These unfortunate Caucasian relatives of ours are having their properties stolen and then they are charged for the full amount of the unpaid balance which is fraudulently held very high through more fraud in low price sale of the property by the sheriff in collusion with the banksters. These folk need prayer! and lots of it. And powder and shot, too.

As I keep reminding you and your fellow officers, your primary and paramount duty is "to ensure that people can exercise their rights in court in safety" (from Sheriff of NSW website). Therefore, you are to blame for the banks stealing of our properties and the judges getting away with treasonously denying us our right to trial by jury. The banks and judges are using you to inflict their evil upon this country. Because of your "just following orders", people's lives have been and continue to be destroyed wrongly and illegally.

Instead of our courts having "the purpose in a civilized society of the vindication of men's rights and enforcement of just causes" (Lord Thomas Denning), you have allowed wickedness to prevail and have participated in the annihilation of English Common Law, Due Process and the Rule of Law. You are the instrument and the weapon of Tyranny.

On last Monday, you and a fellow officer trespassed in order to place a "Notice to Vacate" on my front screen door. My assistant (a lady who has now earned great praise from around the world for her loyalty) videoed a verbal exchange between us ...which, hopefully, will be on YouTube when a friend overcomes his technical difficulties. You said you didn't want to come here at 09:30 am on Tuesday 9 September 2008 but you were "just doing your job". I told you it is not your job to carry out unlawful orders from kangaroo courts and that your job is "to ensure that people can exercise their rights in court in safety". You went away, seemingly unconvinced.

On Tuesday 9 September I am putting on a "Sausage Sizzle" to celebrate Truth, Justice, Freedom and Democracy and have issued an open invitation to friends and patriots. Many people have sent apologies for not being able to be there and said they would be there in spirit.

I invite you and your fellow officers to come, as friends and patriots...but not as bad guys to "follow orders" and betray your families, friends, neighbours and country.

Another emailer suggested Tuesday 9 September be called "E-DAY" to revive the spirit of the Australian Freedom Fighters of the Eureka Stockade in 1853 who stood up for their rights against oppression. In 1854 there were six separate trials of the "rebels" when the British Governor wanted them hung for "High Treason"...but six separate Juries judged they had done no wrong, ie: that they were "NOT GUILTY". The Eureka Stockade is a beacon of Democracy.

Look into your conscience and do right...do your duty.....and know that all law hangs on loving God and loving your neighbour as yourself.

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
331 North Rocks Road,
North Rocks,
NSW 2151,
Australia.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

331 North Rocks Road,
North Rocks, NSW 2151.

3rd September, 2008.

The Presiding Magistrate,
Burwood Local Court,
7 Belmore Road,
Burwood, NSW 2134.

Dear Sir or Madam,

Re: “ARREST WARRANT” CASE/COURT REFERENCE NO 00106657/08/46

I was arrested by two Police officers from Castle Hill Police Station on the morning of 20th August 2008. I was transported (without a seatbelt inside a plastic box on the back of a Police vehicle) to castle Hill Police Station where I was fingerprinted, photographed, locked in a glass cell, etc. I was then transported the same way to Hornsby Local Court and imprisoned in the cells, there, brought before a Magistrate who directed I be transported to Burwood Local Court. Before going the Burwood Local Court I was imprisoned in Silverwater Gaol overnight and locked in a cell in the hospital, there. On Thursday, 21st August 2008, I was handcuffed, etc., and transported to Burwood Local Court and into the cells, there. At 1:00PM, I was taken into the Courtroom, there, and told I had to return to that Court on Tuesday 9th September 2008.

Today, I went to the Burwood Local Court to get a copy of the “ARREST WARRANT”. It says, “REASON FOR ARREST……DEFENDANT FAILED TO APPEAR AT THE Local Court BURWOOD on the 30/07/2008 TO ANSWER THE ABOVER OFFENCE(S) FOUND GUILTY/CONVICTED”.

This is NOT TRUE. Therefore , the ARREST was UNLAWFUL.

(1) I did make an appearance….a special appearance….at the Burwood Local Court on 30/07/2008. I have a copy of the transcript of that occasion when I demanded my inalienable Right to Trial by Jury and Challenged the Jurisdiction of the Court, when that legal Right was disregarded. Magistrate Dakin then disregarded this legal procedure and had me removed from the courtroom. In spite of having NO JURISDICTION to proceed summarily, he did just that IN MY ABSENCE AT HIS DIRECTION.

(2) I have not been “FOUND GUILTY/CONVICTED” because there was NOT A COURT OF PROPER JURISDICTION as there was NO JURY and I had never, at any stage, consented to be without a Jury. A “KANGAROO COURT” is defined as “a court which acts unfairly or dishonestly or disregards legal rights or disregards legal procedures”. The awards, doings and proceedings of such courts are not to be drawn into consequence or example. That court is NOT A COURT OF RECORD.

I truly want the matter of “Commissioner of Taxation v John WILSON” to go to trial in an ordinary and a proper court where Justice is administered….Justice being “the protection of rights and the punishment of wrongs”. Being a Freeman, with “liberty in Christ Jesus”, I can only be taken indeed imprisoned, dispossessed, or outlawed, or exiled, or in any manner destroyed, nor passed over, nor sent over, except by the legal judgment of my own equals indeed the law of the land.

No Act of Parliament can subvert or extirpate the laws and liberties of the People. Any Act of Parliament against Common Right is void.

R v the Magistrates of Sydney (1824) made it abundantly clear that there must be Trial by Jury even in a Magistrate’s Court.

The “BAIL CONDITIONS” which I signed, under the duress of being imprisoned, on 21st August 2008, are void.

By some “coincidence”, I have been served an UNLAWFUL “NOTICE TO VACATE” my property at 331 North Rocks Road, North Rocks for exactly the same time, 9:30 AM, on exactly the same day, 9th September 2008. Therefore, although I said that I wanted very much to be at Burwood Local Court because “Court is where we fight for our Rights”, I will be at 331 North Rocks Road, North Rocks on the morning of 9th September 2008.

Please contact me in order to arrange another time. My phone number at 331 North Rocks Road, North Rocks is (02) 9872 1661…or you can write to me asking me to phone the Registry of the Burwood Local Court, for the same purpose.

Be in no doubt, fighting for Truth, Justice, Freedom and Democracy is my passion … and I will definitely come to Burwood Local Court, to do just that

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2nd September 2008

D-DAY DOWN UNDER - SAUSAGE SIZZLE

9th September, 2008. 7:00 AM

331 North Rocks Road, North Rocks.

BANK LOANS ARE FRAUD
FORECLOSURES ARE ILLEGAL

Variable interest rates render a contract void for uncertainty, ie: they are illegal under Common Law - which is the Law of the People, by the People and for the People.

A Freeman can only be dispossessed by the lawful judgment of a Jury (Magna Carta). This is our inalienable Right. Trial by Jury is Democracy because, in a Democracy, Sovereignty lies with the People – and Sovereignty is “the ultimate authority to make and impose laws”.

Common Law is made by the unanimous judgments of 12 Freemen gathered together as Jurors who ask, “So help me God”, in order that they can administer Justice – and Justice is “the protection of rights and the punishment of wrongs”.

No Parliament can make laws which take away the Rights of the People.

Kangaroo Courts are “courts which act unfairly or dishonestly or disregard legal rights or disregard legal procedures”. No Court has jurisdiction to proceed summarily (without a Jury) unless both parties consent to be without a Jury.

Writs of Possession awarded by the Kangaroo Courts of Australia are not to be drawn into consequence or example – they are illegal and void.

It is the primary and paramount duty of the Sheriff “to ensure that People can exercise their Rights in Court in safety”.

BUT, at 7:00 AM Tuesday 9 September 2008, the Sheriff will attempt to enforce an illegal Writ of Possession by using an equally illegal Notice to Vacate.

THIS OUTRAGE and ACT OF SHEER TREACHERY is being inflicted on hundreds of thousands of AUSTRALIAN FAMILIES.

The BANKS are CRIMINALS. The JUDGES are CORRUPT and the SHERIFFS are “just following orders”.

SO, COME TO THE CELEBRATION OF TRUTH, JUSTICE, FREEDOM & DEMOCRACY.

- John Wilson, www.rightsandwrong.com.au

----------------------------------------------------------------

2nd September 2008

Dear Fellow Australians,

WHY IS D-DAY DOWN UNDER , Tuesday 9 September, IMPORTANT?

Because it brings to the fore the abomination of AUSTRALIA FAMILIES being DESTROYED by the RAPACIOUS BANKS.

Bank LOAN CONTRACTS are simply and blatantly CRIMINAL.

Under COMMON LAW, VARIABLE INTEREST RATES render a contract void for UNCERTAINTY.

The contracts are ILLEGAL... and obtaining money by FRAUD is STEALING.

Signing a fraudulent document does not make it legal.

The "blanket" propaganda, through the media, that these fraudulent contracts are acceptable, is greatest lie intended to cause the greatest deprivation and suffering.

Some 300,000 AUSTRALIAN FAMILIES will be evicted UNLAWFULLY and MALICIOUSLY, this year.

Under COMMON LAW, (Magna Carta 1215, Petition of Right 1627, etc.), a FREEMAN can not be dispossessed unless by the lawful judgment of a JURY.

But AUSTRALIAN JUDGES have conspired with the Banks to deny TRIAL BY JURY, which is an inalienable RIGHT.

Writs of Possession are RUBBER STAMPED by AUSTRALIAN JUDGES in Australia's KANGAROO COURTS.

The SHERIFFS' sworn duty is "to ensure people can exercise their rights in court in safety"....but they have no idea what that means.

Consequently, the SHERIFFS uncaringly and brutally carry out the orders of the Banks and the Judges.

However, the SHERIFFS are the ACHILLES' HEEL.

Teach the SHERIFFS the TRUTH. Teach them to be HUMAN BEINGS.

Then the EVIL EMPIRE will FALL.

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
http://www.rightsandwrong.com.au

----------------------------------------------------------------

1st September 2008

Dear Fellow Australians,

I have just had the expected visit from the Sheriffs from Parramatta. A video was taken and it will, hopefully, be on Youtube, a.s.a.p.

The "NOTICE TO VACATE" is dated for 09:30;00 AM Tuesday 9 September 2008.

Of course, there is NO CHANCE I'm going to surrender to these criminals and traitors, ie: to the "First Mortgage Company Home Loans Pty Ltd" (with their fraudulent loan contracts .... where variable interest rates render a contract void for uncertainty, etc. ) and the "Judges" (with their Kangaroo Courts...disregarding the Right to Trial by Jury and disregarding the legal procedure of Challenging the Jurisdiction of the Court).

The Sheriffs are disregarding their primary and paramount duty of "ensuring that people can exercise their Rights in Court in safety". They are nothing but mindless thugs "just following orders"...which is the "Defence" rejected at the Nuremberg Trials.

The Sheriff's Inspector Wayne Flexman says he doesn't want to be at my property on the 9th of September... but that, of course, is a lie. He and his partners-in-crime will be there ...and, I'm sure, they will have the NSW POLICE FORCE as re-enforcements. They will do to me what they have done, are doing, and will continue to do to hundreds of thousands of ordinary Australian families, who are victims of the Banks and the Judges.

Wayne Flexman (parramattasheriff@agd.gov.nsw.au ) has asked that I get a "STAY OF PROCEEDINGS" from the Courts so he "won't have to be here on September 9"....which he knows will never be granted by Australian "Judges", who are "frauds, liars, criminals, traitors and fools".

Therefore, 09:00:00 AM Tuesday 9 September 2008 is "D-Day".

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
http://www.rightsandwrong.com.au

------------------------------------------------------------------

The Sheriff of NSW,
Hornsby.
Fax: (02) 9847 9920.

Dear Sirs,

Re: Your primary and paramount duty.

It is on your own website that it is your primary and paramount duty to ensure that people can exercise their rights in court in safety.

I will be in the Hornsby Local Court on Monday 1st September 2008 and demanding to exercise my right to trial by jury.

Experience has taught me that Judges and Magistrates deny me that right. They do so unlawfully and maliciously. They order you, the Sheriff, to violate your sworn duty and assault me. They proceed summarily without my consent to be without a jury...which is, again, unlawful and malicious.

Attached is a leaflet, entitled "ATTENTION POLICE AND SHERIFFS", which I would like you to read.

I have a website, www.rightsandwrong.com.au , devoted to fighting for our rights and defeating the evils and injustices which have overtaken this country and We the People.

I call upon you to do right....which, if the Magistrate so offends, to arrest hi or her.

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

ATTENTION: POLICE AND SHERIFFS.

DO YOU REALLY WANT TO BE USED TO DESTROY TRUTH, JUSTICE, FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY?

THAT’S WHAT THE BANKS AND JUDGES HAVE YOU DOING.

**********************

AUSTRALIANS ARE FREEMEN WITH AN INALIENABLE RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY - BECAUSE JURIES NULLIFY BAD LAWS THAT DESTROY OUR LAWS AND OUR LIBERTIES.

BANKS AND JUDGES HAVE SCHEMED FOR MANY YEARS TO STEAL OUR HERITAGE, OUR COUNTRY AND DESTROY OUR CHRISTIAN VALUES OF FAMILY AND COMMUNITY.

POLICE AND SHERIIFS ARE HOW THEY ENFORCE THEIR WILL ON US. THEY RELY ON POLICE AND SHERIFFS BEING BRAINWASHED AND INDOCTRINATED……NOT TO QUESTION WHAT THEY DO…..AND NOT TO OBEY THEIR CONSCIENCE WHEN ORDERED TO DO WRONG.

“WHAT DOES IT PROFIT A MAN TO GAIN THE WHOLE WORLD AND LOSE HIS OWN SOUL?”

WITHOUT YOU, THE EVIL BANKS AND JUDGES ARE POWERLESS.

WITHOUT YOU, THEIR EVIL LAWS ARE NOTHING.

STAY IN YOUR JOB AND DO RIGHT.

-Written by John Wilson, http://www.rightsandwrong.com.au

----------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Lionel & Toni,

Bill Hayden was a staunch "Republican" when put in to be "G.-G.". He soon found out the total fraud of the position (ie: no such Order from the Privy Council for the appointment, etc..) and was very quickly told to toe the "Establishment Line" and go along with the charade ..... which the Bankers exploit, in order to rape the country and subjugate the People ......with the elimination of our Rights being rubber-stamped by "Royal Assent".

"The lust for money is the root of all evil"....and the Bankers have that, in spades.

Now, a female Republican (a Quentin Bryce, or some such name) is to be the next Australian "Governor-General".

Only Bankers' stooges go into those "executive" positions. The same goes for "Judges"....all fraud....and State "Governors"....fraud, fraud, fraud.

It's one big scam....and as the Bill of Rights 1688 said, "evil counsellors, judges and ministers endeavouring to subvert and extirpate the laws and liberties of the people"

Anyway you look at it, it's straight-out Treason.

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.

PS: In Hornsby Local Court, today, I accused a "Magistrate" (Leslie John Brennan) of denying me the Right to Trial by Jury...and he said, "Yes.". He also disregarded the legal procedure of my Challenging the Jurisdiction of the Court by saying he did have jurisdiction...to which I responded, "You can't judge in your own cause. That's against the Rules of Natural Justice". He treated the whole thing as a joke. Three female Sheriff's Officers sat in the courtroom, like zombies, refusing to do their duty, "to ensure that People can exercise their Rights in Court in safety", when I called upon them to arrest the so-called "Magistrate". JW.

PPS: When I was ordering the transcript in the Registry, I saw the "Magistrate" at the back wall talking to a clerk. I called out, "Leslie!" and he turned an looked at me. I then asked him, "How much money did you collect, this morning?". He did not answer, put his head down and walked quickly out through a rear exit JW.

--------------------------------------------------------

13th August 2008.

Dear Fellow Australians,

(sanitised) said to "The Honourable Justice" Anthony Johnson, "No Act of Parliament can take away my Rights." and was totally totally disregarded.

Yesterday in the Supreme Court of New South Wales, (sanitised) tried to present their case against Perpetual Limited (former known as Perpetual Trustees Australia Limited) ACN 000 431 827 and the Writ of Possession awarded to Perpetual Limited earlier.

Johnson J ignored all of the Affidavit (sanitised) and (sanitised) had filed last week (a copy is attached to this email). Johnson J staunching would not allow the DVD annexed to the Affidavit to be shown in court (a good copy can be obtained from me or it can be viewed in bits on http://www.youtube.com:80/user/TakeBackYourHome ).

Johnson J, after persistent argument by (sanitised), showed (sanitised) court documents relating to the Writ of Dispossession. (sanitised) asked that they be photocopied and an adjournment to give time to read them and get legal advice. Johnson J said "No".

Johnson J would not order Perpetual Limited to produce the original Loan Contract document and would not allow an adjournment for (sanitised) to file a Subpoena for it.

Johnson J put his head down and read out his "Judgment", quoting the Statute Laws which abolish the Right to Trial by Jury and quoting "Judgments" from other "Honourable Judges" endorsing the subverting and extirpation of our laws and liberties.

Before "proceedings " started, (sanitised) said she wanted me as their Mackenzie's Friend. I then drew up a chair and sat at the "Bar Table" and Johnson J said I would not be allowed to speak. I wrote messages to (sanitised) on a foolscap pad and whispered occasionally.

When Johnson J had concluded his hatchet job, (sanitised) showed Johnson J a "Notice of Intention to Appeal - Form 103 (version 1) UCPR 51.6" and said he would go straight to the 5th floor Registry to file it. Johnson J said he could do that.

They filed the "Notice of Intention to Appeal", paid the filing fee, and walked to the extraordinarily plush offices of Gadens Lawyers to serve a copy.

(sanitised) phoned the Parramatta Office of the Sheriff of NSW and left a message of what had transpired that afternoon.

Now, (sanitised) have experienced the sheer arrogance and treachery of the Australian Judiciary.

Before going into court a television crew took some footage and did a very brief interview - but made no commitment as to putting it it air...however, they did say they were interested in a Public Meeting (sanitised) are about to organize for People in the Bankstown area very soon.

(sanitised) said to the television journalist, "No price is too high to pay for Justice.".

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.

--------------------------------------------------------------

The Hon. Anna Bligh, MP,
Premier of Queensland.

Dear Madam,

Be aware that the changes proposed to the Jury system are nothing less than Treason.

Trial by Jury is Democracy.

In a Democracy, Sovereignty is with the People and they exercise that Sovereignty, ie: the ultimate authority to make and impose laws, by way of Trials by Juries when congregations of 12 Freemen make and impose Common Law. Common Law, ie: the law of the People, by the People and for the People, overrules Acts of Parliament which are against Common Right.

Trial by Jury is the Palladium of Liberty; the Bulwark of Freedom; the only Defence against Tyranny.

Sir William Blackstone said, " UPON these accounts the trial by jury even has been, and I trust ever will be, looked upon as the glory of the English law. And, if it has so great an advantage over others in regulating civil property, how much must that advantage be heightened, when it is applied to criminal cases! But this we must refer to the ensuing book of these commentaries: only observing for the present, that it is the most transcendent privilege which any subject can enjoy, or with for, that he cannot be affected either in his property, his liberty, or his person, but by the unanimous consent of twelve of his neighbours and equals. A constitution, that I may venture to affirm has, under providence, secured the just liberties of this nation for a long succession of ages. And therefore a celebrated French writer q, who concludes, that because Rome, Sparta, and Carthage have loft their liberties, therefore those of England in time must perish, should have recollected that Rome, Sparta, and Carthage, were strangers to the trial by jury."

Trial by Jury is an inalienable Right. No Judge can exercise any discretion over that Right. It is long established law that " In any action by consent of both parties the whole or any of the issues of fact may be tried, or any amount of any damages or compensation may be assessed by a Judge without a Jury". Which is to say that if a Memorandum of Consent to be without a Jury is signed by both parties to an action, only then does the Court have Jurisdiction to proceed summarily.

A "majority verdict" is not the verdict of a Jury. A Judgment must of the whole of the Jury, ie; unanimous, or there is no Judgment of any consequence or example.

Sir William Pitt once said, "Necessity is the excuse for every violation of liberty. It is the policy of tyrants and the creed of slaves." Any Judgment must be "beyond a reasonable doubt" or there is no Judgment. Judgments are given by Juries who judge the law and the facts of the matter brought before them (see: Sovereignty) so that they can administer Justice which is "the protection of rights and the punishment of wrongs". Juries pronounce sentences and awards damages...this is not lawfully done by Judges, unless by the consent of both parties.

Judges can not be Jurors because Jurors are the equals of Freemen. Judges are servants who swear to serve. Freemen do not serve anyone. Freemen are sui juris. Juries are "the law of the land".

Treason is a violation of allegiance. Parliamentarians and Judges have and swear allegiance to the People. When 'evil counsellors, judges and ministers.....endeavour to subvert and extirpate the laws and liberties of the People', that is Treason.

Treason is rife in the Parliaments and the Judiciary throughout Australia. Thomas Jefferson said "“The germ of destruction of our nation is in the power of the judiciary, an irresponsible body - working like gravity by night and by day, gaining a little today and a little tomorrow, and advancing its noiseless step like a thief over the field of jurisdiction, until all shall render powerless the checks of one branch over the other and will become as venal and oppressive as the government from which we separated.”.

TAKE NOTICE that We the People of Australia will not tolerate Treason.

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
331 North Rocks Road,
North Rocks, NSW 2151.
PS: The denial of the Right to Trial by Jury in any Court, eg: the Family Court, High Court, Supreme Court, Local Court, etc., is Treason.

----- Original Message -----
From: statements@qld.gov.au
To: colcandy@dodo.com.au
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2008 4:05 PM
Subject: PREMIER ANNOUNCES SIGNIFICANT NEW LAW REFORMS

Joint Statement:

Premier
The Honourable Anna Bligh

Attorney-General and Minister for Justice and Minister Assisting the Premier in Western Queensland
The Honourable Kerry Shine
18/08/2008

PREMIER ANNOUNCES SIGNIFICANT NEW LAW REFORMS

The State Government will introduce 'judge only' trials and majority verdicts for juries under proposed changes to Queensland's criminal justice system, Premier Anna Bligh announced today.

Ms Bligh said the reforms would help create a more robust and equitable justice system.

"One of the cornerstones of our legal system is that all persons brought before the courts should be able to receive a fair trial," Ms Bligh said.

"If at all possible, this should be a trial by a jury of one's peers.

"However, in a small number of cases, it may be useful to have a matter heard by a judge sitting alone. There may be cases that are of such complexity or such notoriety that a judge may be better placed to hear the matter.

Attorney-General and Minister for Justice Kerry Shine said a number of other states made provision for 'judge only' trials and that such a move was not out of step with national and international practice.

"The criminal justice system in Queensland must remain dynamic. Ensuring that we have mechanisms at hand to respond to a range of situations for both prosecution and defence is important," Mr Shine said.

"The system we are considering is similar to the model used in Western Australia where a 'judge only' trial can only take place after an application by either the prosecution or defence. Such an application will then be determined by a judge on the merits of the case.

"In trials where the prosecution applies for a 'judge only' trial, it will only proceed if the accused consents.

"We believe this initiative will ensure our system of justice can strike a greater balance between the rights of the accused, the right of victims of crime and the courts' capacity to ensure trials proceed in a timely and appropriate manner."

Ms Bligh and Mr Shine also announced that legislation would be amended to allow majority verdicts in some jury trials.

"The introduction of majority jury verdicts brings Queensland into line with the majority of other Australian jurisdictions and may also help reduce the number of hung juries in Queensland," she said.

"It would only be considered if a jury cannot reach a unanimous decision after a long deliberation - where one juror dissents after a deliberation of more than eight hours," she said.

"If at that time, after the judge considers the deliberations of the jury to be genuinely locked a majority verdict can be accepted by the court as long no more than one juror is in dissent.

"In the case of trials for the most serious criminal offences - which carry a mandatory life sentence - unanimous verdicts would be retained.

Mr Shine said the amendments to the Jury Act 2005 and the Criminal Code would be introduced into State Parliament next week.

18 August, 2008

Contact: Premier's office 3224 4500

==============================================================

Dear Allan,

Judges can not be Jurors because they are not the equals of Freemen.

They are servants ....servants of the Crown... and the Crown is the servant of the People...ie: "I swear to well and truly serve........".

Magna Carta says very very clearly that there must be "pares (the equal)" of a "Freeman".

What the Parliament can only do is pass Statute Laws which Common Law overrules.

Therefore, we must form People's Grand Juries and indict the traitors who would subvert and extirpate the laws and liberties of the People.

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.

----- Original Message -----
From: Gopher
To: John Wilson
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 4:40 AM
Subject: Jury

John,

Last night on the state news Captain Bligh (Blight) the premier announced that they are going to grant Judges the right to be jurors and this will come into affect in a few months time. Dr. Patel wont get a fair trial is they don't do this. We are all sheep waiting to be slaughtered.

Allan

----------------------------------------------

18th August 2008

Tibor Karolyi,
Insolvency and Trustee Service Australia,
ABN 63 384 330 717,
Level 4, 201 Elizabeth Street,
Sydney, NSW 2000.

Dear Tibor,

YOU EVIL CREATURE.

You know perfectly well that the FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA (ABN: 60 265 617 271) is a KANGAROO COURT (ie: disregarding legal rights and disregarding legal procedures) and that any awards, doings and proceedings thereof are not to be drawn into consequence or example, ie: they are illegal and void. And yet, today, I have learnt that, on 25/07/2008, you contacted the WESTPAC BANKING CORPORATION (ABN: 33 007 457 141) and they have cancelled my MASTERCARD (ABN: 95 108 603 345).

I have never been convicted...never been found guilty...of anything...NOTHING....never had TRIAL BY JURY.

You, and creatures like you, must have some sort of mental disorder for you to act without conscience... to simply (or perhaps with fiendish delight) do wrong.

You know what you are doing to your neighbour....do you know what you are doing to yourself?

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.

----------------------------------------------------

Dear Ray,

That's some knockout video.

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
P.S. Got the Right to Trial by Jury back in Tassie, yet?

J.A.I.L.

(Juries Against Illegal Laws)

As you are aware, 5 men are committing suicide each day in Australia due to the results of State and Federal legislation dealing with Family Law. In Tasmania, the people are currently subject to the most draconian family law that has ever been legislated in the history of the world. The destruction of the family unit continues to be legendary.

Did you know, that last year in Victoria alone, that there were approximately 600 suicides by children. Most of these suicides are directly related to family break-ups. (source ABS) If you were to add up the total suicides in all the states of Australia you would soon realise that we have an epidemic of cruelty on our hands perpetuated by those who will stop at nothing to push down our throats illegal legislation with the purpose of meeting some sick and tormented view of a grand sociological experiment.

The Tasmanian Family Violence Act of 2004 is unlawful, it is (ultra vires) and is in direct contravention of the superior law of Australia, called the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution.

The long term psychological effects on our children is vile mental cruelty to the extreme.

I hope you have a brief moment to watch this video presentation. How far would you go to protect and love your children? Will you continue to accept a law which is evil and destroys families?

If you know someone who has suffered from a result of the Family Law Court or the draconian Tasmanian Family Violence Act of 2004, please tell them about us. Please also ask people to join J.A.I.I.L who are supporters of the Aussie family.

A son asked his Dad, "Will you take part in a marathon with me?" The father, despite the fact that he has a heart condition, said yes. They went on to complete the marathon together. Father and son went on to join other marathons, the father always saying yes to his son's request of going through the race together. One day, the son said, "Dad, let's do the Ironman together." To which his father said once again, yes.

For those who didn't know, the "Ironman" is the toughest triathlon of them all. The race encompasses three endurance events: a 2.4 mile (3.86 kilometre) ocean swim, followed by a 112 mile (180.2 kilometre) bicycle ride, and ending with a 26.2 mile (42.195 kilometre) marathon along the coast of the Big Island in Hawaii.

Father and son went on to complete the race together. View this:

Click Here to view the video of the duo: http://www.godtube.com/view_video.php?viewkey=8cf08faca5dd9ea45513

Father, when I received this e-mail, I thought...

I don't have time for this... And, this is really inappropriate during working days.

Then, I realized that this kind of thinking is exactly, what has caused lot of the problems in our world today.

We try to keep Messiah in church on Sabbath...

Maybe, Sunday ... and, the unlikely event of a midweek service.

We do like to have Him around during sickness....

And, of course, at funerals.

However, we don't have time, or room, for Him during work or play...

Because... that's the part of our lives we think... We can, and should, handle on our own.

May God forgive me for ever thinking...
that there is a time or place where HE is not to be FIRST in my life.

We should always have time to remember all HE has done for us.

Jesus said, "If you are ashamed of me, I will be ashamed of you before my Father."

Yes, I do Love God.

HE is our source of existence and our Saviour.

He keeps us functioning each and every day. Without Him, we are nothing. But, with Christ, HE strengthens us. (Phil 4:13)

Kindest Regards,

Ray Escobar
“Lest We Forget”
J.A.I.L

Phone: 0488 345963
Email: rjescobar1 @ bigpond.com

Secretary
14 Thelma Street
Launceston 7250

Comments

I want to help you in any way I can John

Dear Joanne,

The more Aussie P.M. Kevin Rudd keeps begging to give the banksters money, the more he shows where he's coming from, ie: the camp of the banksters.

As long as we retain Trial by Jury in both its forms (Grand & Petit), we can straigthen the ship (possibly an ironic turn of phrase).

What ought to happen is the complete cancellation of the mortgages and not pay the banksters anything...ie: no more debt and no increase in debt....and establish a truly National Bank along the lines of the original Commonwealth Bank of Australia set up by King O'Malley at the beginning of the 20th century (ie: extinguishable debt).

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.

----- Original Message -----
From:
To: jhwilson @ rightsandwrong.com.au
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 11:46 AM
Subject: I want to help you in any way I can John

Hi John,

I love your site and information - I want to support and help your cause in any way I can.

Right now I am sooo ANGRY about the bloody American Government trying to bail out the money hungry companies .. and I am actually relieved the bid failed... am I the only person happy about this?????

WHY should they try and bail these money hungry companies out???? .

....................................................
Doesn't anybody realise that the banks and lending institutions caused this whole problem in the first place by allowing high risk loans to high risk customers.

Everyone in the world today is living on "chits" or credit no one has any cash money it's all gonna crash big time. America will lead the way they always do.

I wish us Aussies would stop sticking our heads in the sand and realise that the truth is being hidden from us all by the Banks and Judges and Governments of this country.

I am telling EVERYONE I KNOW to Check out the truth below:

http://www.rightsandwrong.com.au/

Honestly - pack your bags everyone because we all might have to leave suddenly and owning nothing but OWING everything

John let me know if there is anything I can do to support your cause in the Port Stephens / Newcastle area.

Sincerely

Joanne xxxxxx

Insolvency Trustees, Government Solicitors and Uncle Tom Cobbly

John Kennedy,
Client Relations Co-ordinator (Acting)

Insolvency and Trustee Service Australia
National Office
Canberra
Telephone : (02) 6270 3430
Facsimile: (02) 6270 3423
mail to :john.kennedy @ itsa.gov.au ,

Dear John Kennedy,
You are "just following orders" .......the Nuremberg Defence which didn't hold water.

Yours sincerely,

John Wilson.
----- Original Message -----
From: Kennedy, John
To: jhwilson @ rightsandwrong.com.au
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2008 2:47 PM
Subject: Internet complaint dated 02 October 2008

03 October 2008

Mr John Wilson
jhwilson @ rightsandwrong.com.au

Dear Mr Wilson

I acknowledge receipt of your internet complaint dated 02 October 2008.

This office is not in a position to assist you in this matter.

Yours sincerely

John Kennedy
Client Relations Co-ordinator (Acting)

Insolvency and Trustee Service Australia
National Office
Canberra
Telephone : (02) 6270 3430
Facsimile: (02) 6270 3423
mail to :john.kennedy @ itsa.gov.au

Kelvin Boateng,
Lawyer,
Australian "Government" Solicitor,
Level 42,
MLC Centre,
19 Martin Place,
Sydney, NSW 2000.

Dear Kelvin,

Re: Your Ref's 07036789 & 08121087 letters dated 26 September 2008.

Both these letters are further testamony to the TREASON that has overtaken the Administration of Australia. Ever Public Servant participating is GUILTY.

Australia is a DEMOCRACY and TRIAL BY JURY IS DEMOCRACY.

Australian Parliaments and the Judiciary are endeavouring to subvert and extirpate the laws and liberties of the People by the attempted extirpation of the People's RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY -which is inalienable. The People of Australia have the RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY ACTION - and to deny it is TREASON.

I have been denied this RIGHT in Australians Court for over 12 years in every action when I have been either the Plaintiff or the Defendant. The proceedings you refer to are examples of this fact. Awards, doings and proceedings when the RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY have been disregarded are not to be drawn into consequence or example, ie: they are illegal, null and void. Trying to enforce Judgments from such KANGAROO COURTS is a heinous offence and those committing the atrocity must be brought to JUSTICE.

"Trial by Jury is the Palladium of Liberty." "Trial by Jury is the only anchor yet imagined by man that can hold a government to the principles of its constitution." "Trial by Jury is the Bulwark of Freedom." "Trial by Jury is the only defence against Tyranny."...and so go famous quotes from our ancestors who were honourable men.

The injustices and wrongful suffering caused by "evil counsellors, judges and ministers" with the denial of the RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY, are intolerable. Only by keeping People in the dark and feeding them lieing propaganda, does the TREACHERY continue. "The only way that evil can triumph is for good men to do nothing."

So, what you can do with your menaces is put a match to them...because TRUTH, JUSTICE, FREEDOM and DEMOCRACY will be restored to our country,,,and the TRAITORS will be imprisoned.

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.

Copies to Federal Court of Australia & Insolvency and Trustee Service of Australia.

Re: John Wilson Is In Jail - "The Rules" by John Wilson

21st September 2008

THE RULES

LEVELS OF JURISDICTION:

(i) THEOCRACY – God Rules;

(ii) DEMOCRACY – People Rule and make Common Law.

(iii) BUREACRACY – Officials Rule and make Statute Law.

Judges, Parliamentarians, Sheriffs, Police, etc., are inferior to and servants of the People. No Parliament can make legislation to take away the Rights of the People. “Common law doth control Acts of Parliament and adjudges them when against common right to be void” (Coke).

People exercise their Sovereignty, ie: their ultimate authority to make and impose laws, by way of the unanimous judgments of Juries, who are congregations of 12 Freemen asking “So help me God” in order for them to administer Justice.

Trial by Jury is an inalienable Right. No court has jurisdiction to proceed summarily without the consent of both parties to be without a Jury. Courts are places where Justice administered, ie: where rights are protected and wrongs punished. “The purpose of a court in a civilized society is the vindication of men’s rights and the enforcement of just causes” (Denning).

The denial of the Right to Trial by Jury is Treason - and punishable by imprisonment for life.

It is the sworn primary and paramount duty of the Sheriffs “to ensure that People can exercise their rights in court in safety”.

“No free man shall be seized indeed imprisoned, or stripped of his rights or possessions, or outlawed or exiled, or deprived of his standing in any other way, nor will we proceed with force against him, or send others to do so, except by the lawful judgement of his equals indeed by the law of the land. To no one will we sell, to no one deny or delay right or justice.” (Magna Carta – an entrenched Australian Constitutional Enactment).

“The Truth will make us Free” (Holy Bible).

- Written by John Wilson, http://www,rightsandwrong.com.au

Re: John Wilson Is In Jail - YOU ARE DEAD WRONG ABOUT ONE THING

YOU ARE DEAD WRONG ABOUT ONE MAJOR THING, JOHN
and you are either too proud or too stupid to admit it.

You are living in a DEMOCRACY that changes the rules as it sees fit.

Otherwise you would NOT BE IN THE INVIDIOUS POSITION YOU ARE IN NOW.

FIND: REPUBLIC vs. DEMOCRACY
Read and Learn, fool!: http://www.1215.org/lawnotes/lawnotes/repvsdem.htm and http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1143.htm

Exposé

"Government is not reason; it is not eloquence; it is force!
Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master."
--George Washington

There are three kinds of people in the world:
* Those who do what they're told without question,
* Those who control them, and-
* Those who refuse to play that game - ENVIED AND HATED BY THE OTHER TWO.
Copula eame se non posit acceptara jocularem.

-----------------------------------------------------------

4th June 2008

Attorney RETAINER is and is only a GIFT and a Donation

Did any ATTORNEY ever ask you for a $________.00 for a RETAINER????

Did that ATTORNEY tell you that a RETAINER was and is only a GIFT and a DONATION????

Did that ATTORNEY tell you that he or she is NOT obligated to do any work for you on your case for the $5,000.00 to $10,000.00 RETAINER that you just gave them thinking that you just gave them a DOWN PAYMENT to WORK ON YOUR CASE????

A "retainer" is a sum of money paid by a client to secure an attorney's availability to work for a client.

The fee paid is considered earned at the time of payment because the attorney is entitled to the money regardless of whether he actually performs any services for the client, and the funds shall not be placed into the attorneys trust account. Baranowski v. State Bar, 154 Cal.Rptr. 752, 593 P.2d 613 (1979); and the Washington State Bar News, Committee Reports, Formal Opinion No. 173.

The California Court in Baranowski v. State Bar, supra, clearly stated that: A "RETAINER IS A SUM OF MONEY PAID BY A CLIENT TO SECURE AN ATTORNEYS AVAILABILITY TO WORK FOR A CLIENT."

A RETAINER only pays for the AVAILABILITY of the attorney.

The FACT is that when you make an appointment to talk to an attorney for a DUI, traffic ticket, domestic violence, driving without a license, driving while intoxicated, negligent driving or any other kind of case, they meet with you, they let you TALK for about 5 to 10 to 15 minutes and then they ask you for a $3,000.00 to $5,000.00 to a $10,000.00 or more as a RETAINER so that you can secure their availability only!

The California Court in Baranowski v. State Bar, supra, clearly stated that . . .

"THE FEE PAID IS CONSIDERED EARNED AT THE TIME OF PAYMENT BECAUSE THE ATTORNEY IS ENTITLED TO THE MONEY REGARDLESS OF WHETHER HE ACTUALLY PERFORMS ANY SERVICES FOR THE CLIENT, . . . and the funds shall NOT be placed into the attorneys trust account."

Wow, the attorneys are so stuck up and think that they are so above us "peons" or "goi dogs"that you have to pay them for merely "gracing you with their presence" and that they consider the RETAINER earned at the time you are dumb enough to give it to them REGARDLESS OF WHETHER HE OR SHE ACTUALLY PERFORMS ANY SERVICES FOR THE CLIENT!!!!

WANT TO KNOW MORE ABOUT THE TRAFFIC SCAM????

ARE YOU TIRED OF BEING RIPPED OFF BY ATTORNEYS WHO ARE ALL MEMBERS IN GOOD STANDING OF THE VERY SAME BAR ASSOCIATION THAT ALL THE PROSECUTORS AND JUDGES ARE MEMBERS OF????

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

4th June 2008

PROOF THAT AN ATTORNEYS RETAINER IS A 100% RIP OFF!

The following case PROVES that an ATTORNEYS RETAINER is merely a GIFT or a DONATION: A “retainer” is a sum of money paid by a client to secure an attorney’s availability to work for a client.

The fee paid is considered earned at the time of payment because the attorney is entitled to the money regardless of whether he actually performs any services for the client, and the funds shall not be placed into the attorneys trust account.

Baranowski v. State Bar, 154 Cal.Rptr. 752, 593 P.2d 613 (1979); and the Washington State Bar News, Committee Reports, Formal Opinion No. 173.

The California Court in Baranowski v. State Bar, supra, clearly stated that: A “RETAINER IS A SUM OF MONEY PAID BY A CLIENT TO SECURE AN ATTORNEYS AVAILABILITY TO WORK FOR A CLIENT.”

A RETAINER only pays for the availability of the attorney.

The FACT is that when you make an appointment to talk to an attorney for a DUI, traffic ticket, domestic violence, driving without a license, driving while intoxicated, negligent driving or any other kind of case, they meet with you, they let you TALK for about 5 to 10 to 15 minutes and then they ask you for a $3,000.00 to $5,000.00 to a $10,000.00 or more as a RETAINER so that you can secure their availability only!

The California Court in Baranowski v. State Bar, supra, clearly stated that . . . THE FEE PAID IS CONSIDERED EARNED AT THE TIME OF PAYMENT BECAUSE THE ATTORNEY IS ENTITLED TO THE MONEY REGARDLESS OF WHETHER HE ACTUALLY PERFORMS ANY SERVICES FOR THE CLIENT, . . . and the funds shall NOT be placed into the attorneys trust account.”

Did you know that most attorneys and law firms keep TWO (2) SETS OF BOOKS?

1.) The first RECEIPT BOOK that they DESTROY is the RECEIPT BOOK for RETAINERS and they are NOT reporting RETAINERS as INCOME????).

2.) The second RECEIPT BOOK is the ONE (1) book and record that they are REQUIRED to keep for accepting A FEE which is the ONLY INCOME that attorneys or law firms are reporting to THE IRS!!!!

THIS ALSO COULD BE PROOF THAT ATTORNEYS ARE NOT PAYING THEIR FAIR SHARE OF INCOME TAXES BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT KEEPING ALL THE REQUIRED BOOKS AND RECORDS OR PROOF OF 100% OF ALL THEIR INCOME!!!!

A RETAINER is NOT the same thing as a FEE to do some work on your case!

An ATTORNEYS RETAINER is ONLY a GIFT or DONATION.

When you have given any ATTORNEY or LAW FIRM any MONEY towards any RETAINER, you have NOT hired them to do any WORK on your case!!!!

The ATTORNEYS or LAW FIRMS got your first RETAINER as a GIFT or DONATION, but you have NOT hired them to do any work on your case yet!

Now if you want an ATTORNEY or LAW FIRM to do some WORK on your case, you will have to PAY A FEE and sign a contract stating what services he will provide for you and state how much more he or she will charge you to REPRESENT you at trial and then AFTER you have PAID his or her FEE, then they will file a NOTICE OF APPEARANCE in your case.

HIRE LUIS EWING TO WORK ON YOUR CASE INSTEAD OF GIVING DONATIONS & GIFTS TO ATTORNEYS & LAW FIRMS TO DO ABSOLUTELY NOTHING ON YOUR CASE!

Luis Ewing at (253) 226-3741 or rcwcodebuster @ comcast.net or rcwcodebuster @ yahoo.com or rcwcodebuster @ gmail.com or rcwcodebuster @ hotmail.com

Re: John Wilson In Jail - Sheriffs Can Be Charged With Treason

21st September 2008

Just a copy of what I sent to the Burwood Sheriff's Office on John's behalf.

Good luck John - Debra

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Debra Bentley
Date: Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 10:05 AM
Subject: Know & understand the Law for all concened
To: burwoodsheriff @ agd.nsw.gov.au

Dear Sheriff & Officers,
In the matter of Mr John Wilson - he is absolutely right and you can be held accountable for your actions against him. Not only under Commonwealth Law but also International Law.

I understand you may not be aware of the Law so I have included a section of Mr Sharkey's trial under Sedition Law in Australia. You may also add Subversion / Treason to this if you continue to behave in this manner. I encourage you to read, learn and understand the Law so you can uphold Australia's Democracy values and you will not treat others unjustly in future.

I have included some other excerpts for your interest as well.

From Sharkey's Trial in Australia.....

The indictment was laid under Section 24D of, the Commonwealth Crimes Act 1914-1946. Section 24D makes it an indictable offence for a person to write, print, utter or publish any seditious words, the penalty for which is imprisonment for three years. Section 24B of the same act states that seditious words are "words expressive of a seditious intention."

But the explanation of what is a seditious intention appears in Section 24A of this act which makes any of the following intentions seditious:

(a) to bring the Sovereign into hatred or contempt;

(b) to excite disaffection against the Sovereign or the Government or Constitution of the United Kingdom or against either House of the Parliament of the United Kingdom;

(c) to excite disaffection against the Government or Constitution of any of the King's Dominions;

(d) to excite disaffection against the Government or Constitution of the Commonwealth or against either House of the Parliament of the Commonwealth;

(e) to excite disaffection against the connexion of King's Dominions under the Crown;

(f) to excite His Majesty's subjects to attempt to procure the alteration otherwise than by lawful means, of any matter in the Commonwealth established by law of the Commonwealth; or

"(g) to promote feelings of ill-will and hostility between different classes of His Majesty' s subjects so as to endanger the peace, order or good government of the Commonwealth,"

It is important, however, to note that this same section, 24A, goes on to say that it shall be lawful for any person:

"(a) to endeavour in good faith to show that the Sovereign has been mistaken in any of his counsels;

"(b) to point out in good faith errors or defects in the Government or Constitution of the United Kingdom or any of the King's Dominions or of the Commonwealth as by law established, or in legislation, or in the administration of justice. with a view to the reformation of such errors or defects;

"(c) to excite in good faith His Majesty's subjects to attempt to procure by lawful means the alteration of any matter in the Commonwealth as by law established; or

"(d) to point out in good faith in order to their removal any matters which are producing or have a tendency to produce feelings of ill-will and hostility between different classes of His Majesty's subjects."

Therefore if Sharkey's words were "to point out in good faith errors or defects in the Government of the Commonwealth or in the administration of justice with a view to their reformation of such errors or defects" he should not have been convicted under the Crimes Act.

NOW DO YOU UNDERSTAND? 'TO DISAFFECT A PERSON SO THAT HE IS IN A POSITION WHERE HE WILL NOT DEFEND HIS 'KING' OR COUNTRY IS ALSO AN ACT OF SUBVERSION'.......= TREASON !!!!

From the International Court..........

ENFORCEMENT OF INJUSTICE BY GOVERNMENT PERSONNEL IS AN ILLEGAL PUNISHABLE ACT (cf. The Nuremberg Precedent).

At all times, every adult person has the moral and legal responsibility to suppress injustice. Every act of injustice is a common law crime, whether committed by private citizens or by the state (government). Jurors and government employees alike are accountable. See Principles, U.N., 12-10-1946, ratified by all Western governments:

PRINCIPLE IV: "The fact that a person acted pursuant to the order of his government or a superior does not relieve him from responsibility under international law, provided a moral choice was in fact possible to him."

Whether by participation in the enforcement of arbitrary legislation, or from the following of direct orders, being party to the execution of an injustice is a criminal offence (cf. Crime Against Humanity).

De jure [under the law], under pain of penalisation, all those involved at every stage of the creation, maintenance and enforcement of law, must make the moral choice and judge the law and their own actions in relation to the law, and accordingly make the apposite decision.

TRIAL BY JURY IS INIMITABLE.

Citizen-Juries educated and instructed to judge on the justice of law and its enforcement, can be relied upon to protect people from the state, when the state breaches correct behaviour in attempting to enforce injustices. It is for this reason that those who stand to gain money and/or power from tyranny by the imposition of unjust 'laws', regard the genuine Trial by Jury as an obstacle to be undermined and destroyed. Untrustworthy at best, of outright criminal intent at worst, are those who, instead of restoring Common Law Trial by Jury to its true form, would discard it altogether.

Legislators and judges are exposed to all the temptations of money, fame and power, to induce them firstly, to overlook and deliberately disregard justice in the framing, passing, interpreting and enforcing of legislation; and secondly, to become actively biased between contesting litigants, causing politicians and judges to sell the rights and interests, and violate the liberties of the People. Jurors are exposed to none of these temptations.

Quote from Cicero -

"A nation can survive its' fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and he carries his banners openly. But the traitor moves among those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the galleys, heard in the very hall of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor--He speaks in the accents familiar to his victims, and wears their face and their garment, and he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation--he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of a city--he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to be feared.

"Cicero, 42 B.C., Roman Statesman, orator, and author.

Have a nice day.
Regards
Debra Bentley

Re: John Wilson Is In Jail - Dear Sheriff, Reply From Nick JW

Thanx JW,
In response to your posting 18th September 2008 - Dear Sheriff

These imbalanced thugs/cops/sheriffs are screened for "free-thinking" ability in their piggy schools. If they show too much intelligence, they are culled, and replaced with insecure, psychotics with a need to fill the void in their lives with a uniform, and thus power over others. These bureaucratic positions attract the fat and stoooopid in droves!!!! Nick.

Having To File A Requisition For Trial By Jury Is Totally Wrong

Dear Leslie,

Having to file a Requisition for Trial by Jury is totally wrong... it is the trickery employed by these traitors to deceive the unknowing.

Trial by Jury is an inalienable Right...it is NOT a privilege some official can condescendingly decide to allow. This Right is part-n-parcel of and essential to Democracy (see attachment on Levels of Jurisdiction, ie: 1.Theocracy (God Rules); 2. Democracy (People Rule); and 3. Bureaucracy (Officials Rule)). People do not rule God and Officials do not rule People.

Once you step into a Court, there must be Trial by Jury. If you don't want Trial by Jury, you must sign and file a Memorandum of Consent to be without a Jury...otherwise, the Court has no Jurisdiction to proceed summarily.....and is a Kangaroo Court and not a Court of Record.

Lawyers and Judges will tell you the opposite...which is why our Courts have ceased to be places where Justice is administered, ie: where rights and protected and wrongs punished.

Judges must never be given nor allowed to assume absolute power whereby they can conceal their own incompetence, corruption and treachery.

If you don't immediately get a Jury, then Challenge the jurisdiction of the Court...a legal procedure which brings about a peremptory, mandatory and absolute Stay of Proceedings until the jurisdiction is determined by a Special Jury...ie: a Jury will decided if you have the Right to Trial by Jury.

We are at this point in history when we either fight back or go down.

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.

-----------------------------

LEVELS OF JURISDICTION
OR
THE RULES OF THE GAME

It is the game of “World Control”. It is a serious game and the stakes are the highest imaginable, because we stand to lose our Rights to “Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness”. In the 18th century, when the American Colonies were suffering at the hands of a despotic King, they knew what they were entitled to under English Common Law which has, as it’s foundation, the Charters of Liberty such as Magna Carta 1215, Petition of Right 1627, Habeas Corpus 1640 and the Bill of Rights 1688, and that “the glory of English law” (as Sir William Blackstone wrote) has always been Trial by Jury. For megalomaniacs to take over the world, they must first dispose of these icons which have indelibly confirmed the Order and the Rule of Law according to the Christian perspective. If we are going to defeat the Forces of Evil, we need to understand and hold to the Levels of Jurisdiction.

THE RULE OF LAW

“The supremacy of law. A feature attributed to the UK constitution by Professor Dicey (Law of the Constitution, 1885). It embodied three concepts: the absolute predominance of regular law, so that the government has no arbitrary authority over the citizen; the equal subjection of all (including officials) to the ordinary law administered by the ordinary courts; and the fact that the citizen’s personal freedoms are formulated and protected by the ordinary law rather than by abstract constitutional declarations.”
(Oxford Reference, A Dictionary of Law, Oxford University Press)

WHO IS THE LAW?

The Latin word, “iuris”, is translated into English as meaning “law, right, justice; law court; jurisdiction, authority”. In the movie, “The Verdict”, the actor, Paul Newman, stands in front of the Jury and says to them, “You are the law.”. A Jury is made up of 12 men and women who are the equals of the men and women who are the plaintiffs and defendants in a court action, and have been brought together to judge the laws and the facts presented to them.

IT’S ALL A QUESTION OF SOVEREIGNTY

Sovereignty is the ultimate authority to make and impose laws.

WHO HAS SOVEREIGNTY OVER WHOM AND WHAT?

That is to say, WHO rules? In a THEOCRACY, GOD rules. In a DEMOCRACY, People rule. In a BUREACRACY, officials rule. And, it’s all a matter of seniority or, in other words, superiority in standing.

AT Level One: GOD over Man:-
GOD created Man. GOD is superior to Man, ie: to a natural person.

AT Level Two: Man over Parliament:-
Man created Parliament. Man is superior to Parliament, ie: to an artificial person

AT Level Three: Parliament over Corporations:-
Parliament creates Corporations. Parliament is superior to Corporations, ie: to artificial persons

AT Level Four: Corporations over nothing:-
Corporations create nothing. Corporations are superior to nothing and inferior to everything.

In brief, and using the symbol, “>”, to denote “is superior to”, we have:-

GOD > Man > Parliament > Corporations.

*******************************

Definitions:-

(i) natural = product of nature; not man-made or artificial.
(ii) artificial = made by human skill or labour; not natural.
(iii) Natural Law = law based on the natural tendency of human beings to exercise right reason in dealing with others. Natural law precedes and is regarded as the basis of common law.

*******************************

Comments:-

(i) Even Judges recognize the application of SUPERIORITY, eg: in the functioning of the Court System Superior Courts have the jurisdiction/ power to overrule Inferior Courts.

(ii) Parliaments create the Courts and Judges, which leaves:- Man > Judges.

(iii) A Man cannot sit in judgment of another Man, but GOD has made provision for a congregation, ie: a Jury, to do so.

(iv) A Man, being a natural person, cannot be a Corporation, ie: an artificial person. Therefore, Judges can never be “> Man” and to allow Judges to judge a Man, because that would be incompatible with the sequence of SUPERIORITY.

(v) “Hominum caus jus constitum est” - a legal maxim translates to “Law is established for the benefit of man”. This is the prime objective of the Law.

(vi) Another legal maxim says, “Nemo admittendis est inhabilitare seipsum” which translates to “No one is allowed to incapacitate himself”. Therefore, a Man (ie: a natural person) cannot be an artificial person, which would incapacitate him and deny him of his Right, as a Freeman, to Trial by Jury.

(vii) Still more legal maxims say such things as, “When laws imposed by the State fail, we must act by the Law of Nature”, “The Law punishes falsehood”, “The more common the evil, the worse”, “The greatest enemies to Peace are force and wrong”,.....and, of course, “Rights never die”.

(viii) Magna Carta put it correctly by saying “No Freeman shall be.... unless by the legal judgment of his own equals indeed the law of the land.”

(ix) So, when a Man goes into a court and the Magistrate or Judge tries to make out that he has jurisdiction over you, you tell him, “You are at Level Three in the ‘pecking order’. I am at Level Two. I have jurisdiction over you – not you over me. I have the inalienable Right to Trial by Jury - and, if I don’t want to avail myself of a Jury, I’ll give my consent to that effect. Until then, do not exceed your jurisdiction.”

************************************

THE LEVELS OF JURISDICTION/SOVEREIGNTY ARE:-

1. GOD or THEOCRACY where GOD rules.

2. MAN or DEMOCRACY where People rule.

3. PARLIAMENT or BUREAUCRACY where Officials rule.

4. CORPORATIONS where these entities rule nothing.

************************************

THE NEW WORLD ORDER:-

So that the World may be ruled by Officials, it is necessary to eliminate Levels 1 and 2 in the psyche of Man, with orchestrated, insidious and determined programs of propaganda and prohibition. The “evil counsellors, judges and ministers”, described in the Bill of Rights 1688, are once again systematically undermining and eliminating the laws and the liberties of the People.

The Media and the Schools are playing their parts in these programs of disinformation and mischief to mislead us and our children by devaluing morals and crushing our ability to be free and sovereign human beings.

In the USA, many have been duped into surrendering Sovereignty to their elected representatives under the illusion of having a “Republic”, ie: they have been drawn into believing that Acts of Parliament overrule their own Common Law. In Courts, “evil counsellors and judges” reinforce this deception by proclaiming categorically that, “Statute Law overrules Common Law” .... in other words that, “Level 3 Law overrules Level 2 Law”.

Our Courts are where we must fight to protect and preserve our Rights. The “evil counsellors and judges” have no intention of honouring their Oaths of Office, which is to “well and truly serve” the Queen (ordained by Coronation) and to “do right to all manner of people”, but are totally embroiling in the Drive for a New World Order. It is their role to eliminate Level 1 and Level 2 Sovereignty and have themselves, as Level 3 persons, with power over us. By relegating People to Level 4 impotence, by invoking their Level 3 Admiralty/Commercial Law in our Courts, the legal piranhas wreak their destruction.

We must never forget that GOD has given us this Level 2 Jurisdiction....this gift of Service. If we deny this gift, or say that this gift is not important, we are actually insulting and disobeying GOD.

If we are going to love GOD and love our neighbours as ourselves, we have no choice but to fight the Forces of Evil because “the only way for evil to triumph is that good men do nothing” (Edmund Burke 1729 – 1797).

- Written by John Wilson, http://www.rightsandwrong.com.au

Re: John Wilson Is In Jail - A Message From Col Candy

Dear Arthur and Fiona,
Thank you for advising me of John's unfortunate predicament, and I have taken the liberty of forwarding the message onto the media.

Arthur and Fiona, Please pass on my condolences to John's dear wife.
Best regards Col Candy

Re: John Wilson Is In Jail - Comment From Pierre Free Man

When is John going to learn that his trail by jury only applies in a non-admiralty non-martial jurisdiction?

It is not that he is wrong with what he preaches but he preaches in the wrong venue/jurisdiction!!!

He is so to speak casting pearls before swine and sooner rather than lately he has to realise there are other ways to go to the other side of the brick wall than banging your head against it.

Some times it is as simple as going around the corner and walking through the unlocked side door ie the narrow gate rather than battering at the fortified double laminated steel plated main door which was nothing more than a distraction??

Anyway. I have offered in good faith my 20 cents worth.

Pierre Free Man
Not a crown created corp-oration "dead speaking" sole .... but .... an immortal living breathing soul

ciao for now from Pierre
ze aeronaughty aeronaut

Re: John Wilson Is In Jail - Reply From John Wilson To Pierre

Dear Pierre,

These are OUR COURTS.

They are COMMON LAW COURTS.

If criminals and traitors think they can take OUR COURTS away from us, we've got to step into the arena and defeat the mongrels.

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.

Re: John Wilson Is In Jail - Reply From Wolter J to John Wilson

With respect John,
In a democracy, and you continuously talk about democracy, there is no common law. There is only civil law, civil compliance, and civil courts. Accept that you are only mind-conditioned to accept that democracy is good and allows you to participate in government. However the truth is, democracy is the rule of a controlled and manipulated mob. Man is not to rule over man for that constitutes slavery.

Democracy is your reward for allowing yourself to be labelled a "citizen" of the State and is your punishment for not standing up for your subject status and your true Sovereign. A subject is someone who is under the single authority of the Crown, which represents your Prime Creator, not to be misinterpreted to be your queen. You are only mind-conditioned that the Crown is the queen, or is the queen and parliament, or queen and government. WRONG, the queen is only representing the Crown as the Governor represents the queen. Only the queen acting in the name of the Prime Creator can govern and or sit in judgment of the Prime Creator delivering natural justice.

It is only as a subject that you enjoy natural birthrights such as common law, common law courts, common wealth, and natural justice. Natural justice is for natural (living) things. All that which is created by the Prime Creator, who some call Almighty God.

The electoral laws mandate it compulsory for all Australian citizens to vote. Hence those who vote at elections accept and consent to be citizens. A citizen is a corporate entity (not a natural living being) created by the State. Hence the State becomes your Sovereign. Goodbye natural birthrights, goodbye common law, common law courts, natural justice and common wealth. All is owned and controlled by the State and the State is your Sovereign master who must be obeyed and is your false king, described under the Bible

Fortunately the power to define an Australian citizen was explicitly denied by the Framers to the Federal Parliament at the third Convention at Melbourne, 1898. A motion by Dr John Quick LLb (co-author of the Annotated Constitution of the Australian Commonwealth (often referred to as "Quick and Garran") seeking that power was voted against and thus was explicitly denied. This is not open to interpretation, it is a recorded fact which was further upheld and dealt with under Quick & Garran.

Therefore, if you wish to claim your natural birthrights renounce your citizenship and stand up for your subject status. Make sure that you do not vote, because that is only compulsory for Australian citizens according to the electoral act. Of course the act is unconstitutional for being ultra vires and thus is void ab initio by operation of law. Anyone who seeks to impose a penalty and uphold the act is open to a charge of treason pursuant to s.24 AA of the Crimes Act 1914. Also ss. 5, 6, 7, and 15 D are equally applicable.

Instead of continuously complaining, take off your blinkers John. Re-discover de jure authority. You have been like a stuck record for years - "let's put it to a jury, let's put it to a jury, let's put it to a jury, let's put it to a jury", and have had your head in the sand without progressing your understanding. Now wake up and begin your journey, because only the truth (de jure authority) will set you free.

kind regards

Wolter

Re: John Wilson Is In Jail - Reply From John Wilson To Wolter J

Dear Wolter,

Trial by Jury is Democracy ....... nothing less.

Haven't you read the oh-so simple explanation of how Democracy works....unanimous judgments of Juries, etc., ???

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.

Re: John Wilson Is In Jail - Reply From Wolter J to John Wilson

Sadly John, you cannot comprehend that only citizens live in democracy, which is the rule of the mob [51% control 49% and 51% are again controlled or manipulated]

Subjects live in a monarchy, where only the Monarch reigns/rules in the name of the Prime Creator [Almighty God] and yes, I shall unsubscribe to this list though I do not remember subscribing.

regards

Wolter

Re: John Wilson Is In Jail - Reply From Pierre To John Wilson

And democracy is nothing more than 3 wolves and 5 sheep deciding what's for dinner.
Therein lies your failing my friend.
Pierre

Re: John Wilson Is In Jail - Reply From John Wilson To Pierre

Dear Pierre,

That old Freemason chestnut was never taken seriously from the moment their devious little minds came up with it.

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.

Re: John Wilson Is In Jail - Reply From Brian To Everyone

To all an opinion if I may.

Natural, human man (except precisely to the degree of control by intelligence), feels but does not think. He acts and reacts, automatically and instinctively, in terms of conditioning, (i.e.,of implanted suggestions or impressions), to the stimuli that arise in his physical self or environment.

That is why the great mind controllers, the great predatory interests control the avenues of publicity-TV,radio movies and all entertainment. The exploiter knows that, by bombarding our minds with suggestions, the non thinkers, can always be made to act contrary to their own interests.

Sin, hell,inflation, nationalism, patriotism, 9/11, terrorism, famine disease, fluoride, co2, energy, water, pollution, germs, bird flu; whatever, are suggestions devised to stampede the unthinking. The mass unconscious is ceaselessly deluged with fear and untruths.

Consciousness intelligently informed is man's defence against negative suggestion, or mistaken impression of any kind.

Every living person either controls or is controlled by his unconscious mind. Human, natural man cannot control himself; the Christ self is the would be controller. Intelligent, Christ- directed beings, master their unconscious; unless we do we are slaves- slaves of race; mind; of emotion; of primitive instinct and appetite; of impressions registered during this earth life; slaves of the environment; slaves of any exploiter who "cares to push us about".

Recognition of ourselves as spirit beings, one with infinite intelligence-"God"- and with the lord Jesus Christ-"the way,the truth,and the life"-confers total control.

If we recognise our inner essential spirituality, let our motto be-..............." I can; I will; I am."

Regards Brian McDoug.

Re: John Wilson Is In Jail - Reply From Pierre To John Wilson

Dear John

"Your Courts" as you put it are not for you at all ...

Their paperwork quite clearly says so ...

Well not unless you want to represent the dead.

Speaking corp-orate yes you would be correct in saying they are not operating in common law if you mean a law higher than parliamentary law but they are operating to a higher form of law than what you call common law and the sooner you realise that the sooner you will stop banging your head against the proverbial brick wall.

Oh by-the-way commonwealth common law is not what the Americano freedom movement purports it is, judge made decisions, rightly or wrongly, most often based upon legal fiction and not genuine issues etc., ...........

Your/Our courts are operating in a commercial realm and are only dealing with your security of the person or what is nothing more than your raincoat

You are entitled to the security of that person to reflect back at them.

Therein lies your remedy.

Learn it.

The sooner you do the better.

If you think security means protection think again...........

Security over here in Kiwi land means the following

-----------------------------------

SECURITY

s [2D Meaning of "security"

(1) In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires, the term security means any interest or right to participate in any capital, assets, earnings, royalties, or other property of any person; and includes—

(a) An equity security; and

(b) A debt security; and

(c) A unit in a unit trust; and

(d) An interest in a superannuation scheme; and

(e) A life insurance policy; and

(f) Any interest or right that is declared by regulations to be a security for the purposes of this Act; and

(g) Any renewal or variation of the terms or conditions of any such interest or right;—

but does not include any such interest or right (other than a security referred to in paragraph (f) of this subsection) that is declared by regulations not to be a security for the purposes of this Act.

(2) Where the terms of a security require or allow the subscriber to pay separate amounts of money at different times, each such payment shall, for the purposes of this Act, be treated as payment for the same security as each other payment.]

PUBLIC ACT 1956

Public Act 1956 No 61: Trustee Act 1956, date of assent 25 October 1956.

s2 [securities includes stock, funds, shares, and convertible notes; and securities payable to bearer includes securities transferable by delivery or by delivery and endorsement:]

[equity security means any interest in or right to a share in, or in the share capital of, a company; and includes—

(a) A preference share, and company stock; and

(b) A security that is declared by regulations to be an equity security for the purposes of this Act; and

(c) A renewal or variation of the terms or conditions of any such interest or right or a security referred to in paragraph (a) or paragraph (b) of this definition;—

but does not include any such interest or right or a security referred to in paragraph (a) or paragraph (c) of this definition that is declared by regulations not to be an equity security for the purposes of this Act:].

PUBLIC ACT 1965

Public Act 1965 No 22: Building Societies Act 1965, date of assent 17 September 1965

PROPERTY

property means property of every kind whether tangible or intangible, real or personal, corporeal or incorporeal and, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, includes—

(a) Choses in action and money:

(b) Goodwill:

(c) Rights, interests and claims of every kind in or to property, whether arising from, accruing under, created or evidenced by or the subject of, an instrument or otherwise and whether liquidated or unliquidated, actual, contingent, or prospective:

.....

RIGHTS

rights means all rights, powers, privileges, and immunities, whether actual, contingent, or prospective:

security means a mortgage, submortgage or charge (whether legal or equitable), debenture, bill of exchange, promissory note, guarantee, indemnity, defeasance, hypothecation, [ ] lien, pledge, or other security for the payment of money or for the discharge of any other obligation or liability and in any case whether upon demand or otherwise, whether present or future and whether actual or contingent, and includes an agreement or undertaking to give or execute whether upon demand or otherwise any of the foregoing:

share includes stock:

special resolution has the meaning assigned to it by section 81 of this Act: that being:

SPECIAL RESOLUTIONS

s 81 Special resolutions

(1) A resolution of a society shall be a special resolution when it has been passed by not less than three-fourths of the number of the members of the society qualified to vote on a special resolution, and voting, in person or by proxy, on a poll on the resolution, at a meeting of the society of which notice specifying the intention to move the resolution as a special resolution has been duly given.

(2) The members qualified to vote on a special resolution at a meeting of the society shall be [all the members aged 18 years or more] who were also members at the end of the last financial year before the date of the meeting, except that, if the society's rules so provide, members who at the end of that financial year did not, or at the date of the meeting do not, hold shares in the society to a value of [[$200]] or more shall not be qualified to vote.

(3) For the purposes of this section—

(a) Notice of a meeting shall be taken to be duly given if the notice is given in the manner provided by this Act and by the society's rules:

(b) A meeting of a society shall be taken to be duly held if it is held in the manner provided by the society's rules.

(4) Notwithstanding anything in a society's rules, the business that may be dealt with at the annual general meeting, or at any other meeting, shall include any resolution to be passed as a special resolution.

(5) In any rules made by a society after the commencement of this Act, the expression special resolution, unless the context otherwise requires, means a special resolution as defined in this section.
Compare: Building Societies Act 1962, s69 (U.K.)

PUBLIC ACT 1993

Public Act 1956 No 61: Trustee Act 1956 , date of assent 25 October 1956 s2 [securities includes stock, funds, shares, and convertible notes; and securities payable to bearer includes securities transferable by delivery or by delivery and endorsement:]

PUBLIC ACT 1993

Public Act 1993 No 91: Consumer Guarantees Act 1993, date of assent 20 August 1993 security includes charge and encumbrance :

PUBLIC ACT 1999

Public Act 1999 No 126: Personal Property Securities Act 1999, date of assent 14 October 1999 security interest The debtor or any person with an interest in property that falls within the collateral description included in a registered financing statement may give a written demand to the secured party if—

(a) All of the obligations under the security agreement to which the financing statement relates have been performed:

(b) The secured party has agreed to release part or all of the collateral described in the collateral description included in the financing statement:

(c) The collateral described in the collateral description included in the financing statement includes an item or kind of property that is not collateral under a security agreement between the secured party and the debtor:

(d) No security agreement exists between the parties:

(e) The security interest is extinguished in accordance with this Act.

Compare: Personal Property Security Act 1993, s50(3) (New Brunswick)

CROWN SECURITY INTEREST

Public Act 1978 No 103: Securities Act 1978, date of assent 20 October 1978

MEANING OF SECURITY

s [2D Meaning of "security"

the term security means any interest or right to participate in any capital, assets, earnings, royalties, or other property of any person; and includes—

(a) An equity security; and a debt security; and a unit in a unit trust; and an interest in a superannuation scheme; and a life insurance policy; and any interest or right that is declared by regulations to be a security for the purposes of this Act; and any renewal or variation of the terms or conditions of any such interest or right;—

PUBLIC ACT 1956

Public Act 1956 No 61: Trustee Act 1956, date of assent 25 October 1956.

s2 [securities includes stock, funds, shares, and convertible notes; and securities payable to bearer includes securities transferable by delivery or by delivery and endorsement:]

[equity security means any interest in or right to a share in, or in the share capital of, a company; and includes— a preference share, and company stock; and a security that is declared by regulations to be an equity security ; and a renewal or variation of the terms or conditions of any such interest or right or a security referred to in this definition;—

PUBLIC ACT 1965

Public Act 1965 No 22: Building Societies Act 1965, date of assent 17 September 1965

property means property of every kind whether tangible or intangible, real or personal, corporeal or incorporeal and, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, includes— Choses in action and money: Goodwill: Rights, interests and claims of every kind in or to property, whether arising from, accruing under, created or evidenced by or the subject of, an instrument or otherwise and whether liquidated or unliquidated, actual, contingent, or prospective: rights means all rights, powers, privileges, and immunities, whether actual, contingent, or prospective: security means a mortgage, submortgage or charge (whether legal or equitable), debenture, bill of exchange, promissory note, guarantee, indemnity, defeasance, hypothecation, [ ] lien, pledge, or other security for the payment of money or for the discharge of any other obligation or liability and in any case whether upon demand or otherwise, whether present or future and whether actual or contingent, and includes an agreement or undertaking to give or execute whether upon demand or otherwise any of the foregoing: share includes stock: special resolution has the meaning assigned to it by section 81 of this Act: that being: a resolution of a society shall be a special resolution when it has been passed by not less than three-fourths of the number of the members of the society qualified to vote on a special resolution, and voting, in person or by proxy, on a poll on the resolution, at a meeting of the society of which notice specifying the intention to move the resolution as a special resolution has been duly given.

PUBLIC ACT 1956

Public Act 1956 No 61: Trustee Act 1956 , date of assent 25 October 1956 s2 [securities includes stock, funds, shares, and convertible notes; and securities payable to bearer includes securities transferable by delivery or by delivery and endorsement:]

PUBLIC ACT 1993

Public Act 1993 No 91: Consumer Guarantees Act 1993, date of assent 20 August 1993 security includes charge and encumbrance :

PUBLIC ACT 1999

Public Act 1999 No 126: Personal Property Securities Act 1999, date of assent 14 October 1999 security interest The debtor or any person with an interest in property that falls within the collateral description included in a registered financing statement may give a written demand to the secured party

-------------------------------

Understand how to reflect that person back to the correct trustee using commercial principles and then person pays your debts not you.

You are a share owner - 1/20,000,000th of all of Australia [worth at least 100 billion - so you do the maths ] and you are entitled to your share of the security asset of that person as long as you don't commercially dishonour and it will pay your debts.

Imagine this in the same manner as a share holders certificate in a company!!!!

John you are a clever guy.

I am not, nor do I have to teach you how to suck eggs nor how to collect your shares from a shareholding in a company ....

Go figure and when you crack that then you will be doing your part to reduce not augment the national debt.

Now stop complaining about trial by dummies and sheeples in a jury and do the research.

A good starting pointy is Robert Menard - Security Of The Person: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/5511

Feel free to ask non-destructive questions otherwise tell me when you want to stop banging your head on the brick wall.

Please do not be insulted by this but instead see it as a sincere wake up call.

You are not the only one to have lost nearly (if not) everything now.

Here is your golden opportunity to get it back under properly constructed laws of equity in three/fourfold set off but learn The Law first and I'll give you a clue ....... it ain't trial by jury, it ain't common law ........ it is commercial law ......... law bills of exchange act and the "clean hands in equity doctrine", a beautiful narrow gauge, especially when you render unto Caesar that image and superscription that which is his ...........

His laws only apply to him

g=form

His benefit ........... not yours ........... so reflect it without dishonour argument or silence and do not apply it to/for you but against the clown as they are claiming it is theirs, so use it against them and not for you, after all, anything they say can and will be used against them too !!!!!!!!!!!!!

cxiao

Pete Paalvast

Re: John Wilson Is In Jail - Reply From John Wilson To Pierre

Dear Pierre,

Which is exactly how the enemy want us to think.... which is the best reason for maintaining that these are OUR courts where WE make and impose common law ... and that common law is nothing less than the law of the people, by the people and for the people.

Concede to the devil and suffer the consequences.

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.

Re: John Wilson Is In Jail - Reply From Pierre To Everyone

Further more to the "thou good citizen shall vote" ……..

would it not be more correct to say that "every citizen has to enrol" and the "every citizen has to vote" bit is optional? that is what it is over here on kiwi soil or the good ship lollipop also known as: NEW ZEALAND ……

and we don't even have the front of a ship stuck out in SkidKnee harbour like you guys do when you catch the ferry from down town Sydney to Manly you go right past it ‼‼‼! We do have a ships pole at Waitangi though which probably is the same artificial imaginary ship of New Zealand who knows……

Isn't the enrolment the pledge of allegiance???

Isn't the vote an effect of enrolling????????

Isn't that whole vote thing all manipulated by proxy anyways ‼‼‼‼

If it is see how easily they have distracted those of you who thought it was the vote which was compulsory ….. what hope have you got in a courtroom full of lawyers scribes and Pharisees distracting you, well in my humble opinion you had all better seek another distraction in life … unless you are prepared to do a wee bit more discovery of the truth in origin or continue to be spanked for your transgressions and misguided follies for the breaches not in common law but as Wolter said civil law or as I would like to suggest the higher than common law something that is known as commercial law which includes security and security does not get a mention in the definitions of statute to include protection but instead is defined as follows:

crown security interest Public Act 1978 No 103: Securities Act 1978, date of assent 20 October 1978

s [2D Meaning of "security"

the term security means any interest or right to participate in any capital, assets, earnings, royalties, or other property of any person; and includes—

(a) An equity security; and a debt security; and a unit in a unit trust; and an interest in a superannuation scheme; and a life insurance policy; and any interest or right that is declared by regulations to be a security for the purposes of this Act; and any renewal or variation of the terms or conditions of any such interest or right;—

Public Act 1956 No 61: Trustee Act 1956, date of assent 25 October 1956.

s2 [securities includes stock, funds, shares, and convertible notes; and securities payable to bearer includes securities transferable by delivery or by delivery and endorsement:]

[equity security means any interest in or right to a share in, or in the share capital of, a company; and includes— a preference share, and company stock; and a security that is declared by regulations to be an equity security ; and a renewal or variation of the terms or conditions of any such interest or right or a security referred to in this definition;—

Public Act 1965 No 22: Building Societies Act 1965, date of assent 17 September 1965

property means property of every kind whether tangible or intangible, real or personal, corporeal or incorporeal and, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, includes— Choses in action and money: Goodwill: Rights, interests and claims of every kind in or to property, whether arising from, accruing under, created or evidenced by or the subject of, an instrument or otherwise and whether liquidated or unliquidated, actual, contingent, or prospective: rights means all rights, powers, privileges, and immunities, whether actual, contingent, or prospective: security means a mortgage, submortgage or charge (whether legal or equitable), debenture, bill of exchange, promissory note, guarantee, indemnity, defeasance, hypothecation, [ ] lien, pledge, or other security for the payment of money or for the discharge of any other obligation or liability and in any case whether upon demand or otherwise, whether present or future and whether actual or contingent, and includes an agreement or undertaking to give or execute whether upon demand or otherwise any of the foregoing: share includes stock: special resolution has the meaning assigned to it by section 81 of this Act: that being: a resolution of a society shall be a special resolution when it has been passed by not less than three-fourths of the number of the members of the society qualified to vote on a special resolution, and voting, in person or by proxy, on a poll on the resolution, at a meeting of the society of which notice specifying the intention to move the resolution as a special resolution has been duly given.

Public Act 1956 No 61: Trustee Act 1956 , date of assent 25 October 1956 s2 [securities includes stock, funds, shares, and convertible notes; and securities payable to bearer includes securities transferable by delivery or by delivery and endorsement:]

Public Act 1993 No 91: Consumer Guarantees Act 1993, date of assent 20 August 1993 security includes charge and encumbrance :

Public Act 1999 No 126: Personal Property Securities Act 1999, date of assent 14 October 1999 security interest The debtor or any person with an interest in property that falls within the collateral description included in a registered financing statement may give a written demand to the secured party

More on this later but for now some principles that may be of assistance for civil matters ……..

Mat 23:12 And whosoever shall exalt himself shall be abased; and he that shall humble himself shall be exalted.

Mat 23:13 But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in yourselves, neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in.

Mat 23:14 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye devour widows' houses, and for a pretence make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation.

Mat 23:15 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves.

Luk 11:42 But woe unto you, Pharisees! for ye tithe mint and rue and all manner of herbs, and pass over judgment and the love of God: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone.

Luk 11:43 Woe unto you, Pharisees! for ye love the uppermost seats in the synagogues, and greetings in the markets.

Luk 11:44 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are as graves which appear not, and the men that walk over them are not aware of them.

Luk 11:45 Then answered one of the lawyers, and said unto him, Master, thus saying thou reproachest us also.

Luk 11:46 And he said, Woe unto you also, ye lawyers! for ye lade men with burdens grievous to be borne, and ye yourselves touch not the burdens with one of your fingers.

Luk 11:47 Woe unto you! for ye build the sepulchres of the prophets, and your fathers killed them.

Now how about this for a thought ……… don't you only have to enrol (it says nothing about voting apart from enrol to vote ) if you are "in New Zealand/Australia" ??? and …..

where does it say you have to enrol if you are "not in" but on the land not the watery aka admiralty definitions they provide???? See below for definitions the many different New Zealand/s they imaginarily created ….

Are you trying to tell me that the law is that different on the other side of the Tasman???? me thinks not so!!

After all were we on the two little eastern islands some 1600 km off to the south east of the coast of your fine continent were we NOT an annexure to the land known as: New South Wales for many years in the earlier parts of the 1800's when köning yes he was a German whose father never so much as set foot on good olde pommie prisoner of mother england soil, but ruled the United Kingdom's from Hanover Germany also known as: "zie vaderland" and not "pomgolia the motherland" and he was called king George 3 ? apparently mad as a hatter for more than half his reign he or his father George 2 got olde Cookie boy and successors like Matt Flinders to sail around the rocks you now call your home and weren't those könings succeeded by stiff upper lip eh wot William 4 also known as: Silly Willy yes go look up the records …….. and then by Queen Victoria by which time we kiwi's and Mãori's were set adrift to sail our on our own imaginary boat as authorised by the 1835 He Wakaputanga O Te Rangatiratanga O Nu Tireni or Declaration of Independence of New Zealand ("DoI") and Te Tiriti o Waitangi 1840 ("ToW")….. anyways I digress ……………

a lot of you guys and girls, men and women, are quoting de jure de jure de jure law and defacto (law) but how many of you guys/girls know about the principles of law i.e. the causes and their effects of such things????????

Have you discovered the following????????

Wouldn't this tell you or say to you that common law is not as high as you first thought????????

For New Zealand statutes … which encompass all bodies of law not only " common law " but also authorises the bible …. And other covenants treaties and such like greater laws… it is found as follows ……

Public Act 1908 No 89: the New Zealand Judicature Act, date of assent: 4 August 1908 s99 In cases of conflict rules of equity to prevail

Generally [publically sic], in all matters in which there is any conflict or variance between the rules of equity and the rules of the common law with reference to the same matter the rules of equity shall prevail. Compare: 1882 No 31, s11

Where is yor Aussie commonwealth equivalent do a word search stop being brain washed by common-law over-rides everything or what ever else comes out of the other side of the Atlantic or Pacific …. Now this above statute says to me that even if 98.2% of statutes are derogatory … not all statutes are …… this is a narrow gate lets go lookie further …..

Back to cause and effect ….

After all how can you have an effect without a cause??? I cant see how can someone (not somebody/dead person) please enlighten me? ……

So what is reason that you should always not go to the point of origin and work forward from then rather than look backwards at history which already has happened and we cannot undo it .. can we not only change it if we correct and reform???

Do you good people know what the things that are maxims are called???

Are they NOT the things upon which the de jure law is bound and formed ???? i.e. it is therefore not higher than de jure or defacto law ????? see what asking questions rather than making claims does to the mind???

Are these not the things where we need to focus our attention on instead of the distraction of the clown actors also known as: lawyers barristers etc.,?

After all isn't a maxim a principle of law ?? something that is so obvious or has been stated so many times it is a given? Please give me a better definition someone ‼‼!

Well one of them thar maxims is called inclusio unius est exclusio alterius: see expressio unius est exclusio alterius. expressio unius est exclusio alterius: [Law Latin] A canon of construction holding that to express or include one thing implies the exclusion of the other, or of the alternative. For example, the rule that each citizen is entitled to vote implies that non-citizens are NOT entitled to vote. - Also termed inclusio unius est exclusio alterius; expressum facit cessare tacitum. Cf. NOSCITUR A SOCIIUS ; RULE OF RANK. Black's Law Dictionary 7th/8th

Once you realise this … then go look up and read clearly concisely using proper navigational principles etc., what the state of NEW SOUTH WALES … VICTORIA … SOUTH AUSTRALIA … ACT … QUEENSLAND … or … WESTERN AUSTRALIA … is and then see if it includes the land known as: New South Wales etc., ….. and does not only include (a restrictive term unlike and contradistinct to including) a barrage of islands … or the territorial seas … or the continental shelf … or the Cocos Islands …. Or a slice of Antarctica ….. or Lord Howe Island ….. or Papua New Guinea ….. and goodness knows what else that they the de facto legal fictional political entities can dream up in legal-lah-lah-fictional-wonderland ….

Hey it is their story not mine …. I just don't understand it and therefore in order to find the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth …. I ask them questions so I can better comprehend (not "understand" also known as: stand under) and I know what to do if they go silent or argue (commercially dishonour which they always do) with me after asking a question there is a due process of equitable law for this and after all are you not entitled to understand the language of their court???? Do they not have a duty of care to ensure if we ask questions (a withdrawal not a deposit) that they provide the proof of their originating claim as long as we don't dishonour it ‼!

Some of us "not so dumb kiwis" not chasing sheep nor sitting in front of the tellie nor swigging away at a six-pack …. No we were not chasing sheep either …contrary to some popular Aussie myth ‼‼ instead we did this search and find thingie to see what New Zealand meant and how many different ways they can and did define it in several places ….. and that same "few of us kiwis" did a dissertation on it …. Then you will see that unless you are a sailor/citizen or have webbed feet …. then the statutes do not apply to you unless you have webbed feet no brain or similar incapacity … after all we are not paid up members of the states law society therefore the rules do not bind us unless of course we want them to ‼‼‼‼! Me, I would rather prefer to bind them up that is fun watching them constipated instead of you … that is what I call karma ‼‼

I shall attach below the many different New Zealand definitions .. when we thought it was the land yeah right …. Feel free to read it and then go find your own interpretation of your "so called STATE" or commonwealth ………… I reckon you will be surprised if you cant see the similarities …. most of you have at some time or another claimed you are sovereigns ….. come on accept the challenge …. come on be the de jure ….. but if you haven't already …. stop sucking on the teat of the state or the tinnie of XXXX, Tooheys or VB or whatever and dig the rot out and start reflecting it and not red-necked-olde-common-law-paper-terrorist-Mr. JACK-RABBIT-PATRIOT throwing it at the deaf, dumb, blind and stupid persons thye cant help it they are that way that they have foresworn to a foreign lord ……. Read 1Samuel8 all 20 odd verses that will explain why this happens now upon the discovery of this and proper presentment of that instead reflect it back to them then get their silence argument to the contrary or any other dishonourable act they may choose to throw at you and memorialise that through third party witness that is what they do to you with the simplest of things when you properly analyse it even the humble parking ticket or speeding ticket does this due process of law ‼‼‼‼!

If you don't believe me deconstruct some ones speeding ticket ‼‼‼! Piggy wiggy constable squiggly tails issues the infringement/ticket/bill of exchange on side of road ……

Yes it is a bill of exchange is it not? just deconstruct the meaning of a bill of exchange …………..

New Zealand Bills of Exchange Act 1908 Forms and interpretation.

s3 bill of exchange defined note the say defined and means not includes ‼‼‼ now we are moving up a gear or two same when you see a statute that says some one or everyone they include the people, and you will find that they are the real laws not the legal-lah-lah-fictional-wonderland nonsense ! I wil show you a classic example in a minute … however first you need to comprehend a bill of exchange and the difference between body and one ……...

(1) A bill of exchange is an unconditional order in writing, addressed by one person to another, signed by the person giving it, requiring the person to whom it is addressed to pay on demand, or at a fixed or determinable future time, a sum certain in money to or to the order of a specified person, or to bearer.

(2) An instrument that does not comply with these conditions, or that orders any act to be done in addition to the payment of money, is not a bill of exchange.

(3) An order to pay out of a particular fund is not unconditional within the meaning of this section; but an unqualified order to pay, coupled with (a) an indication of a particular fund out of which the drawee is to reimburse himself or a particular account to be debited with the amount, or (b) a statement of the transaction giving rise to the bill, is unconditional.

(4) A bill is not invalid by reason that—

(a) It is not dated:

(b) It does not specify the value given, or that any value has been given, therefor:

(c) It does not specify the place where it is drawn or the place where it is payable.

Compare: 1883 No 8 s 3

Aussie bill of exchange act says the same except it is section 5,6,7 or 8 you have five different extra bits of nonsense at the start of your bills of exchange act, that we 40 million sheep and 4 million sheople don't …….. … NO THIS DOES NOT MEAN I HAVE TEN WIVES ‼‼‼‼ and for the rest the bill of exchange act is almost identical ……… funny that isn't it????

After writing out your ticket bill of exchange ….. then first piggy wiggy on the side of the road (who generally doesn't have an IQ over 71 otherwise he wouldn't be accepted for the job of traffic duties, or have a conscience to do the derogatory job that he does do ‼‼) well he then gives it to another piggy wiggly to send out ……… wait for it ….. three notices ….. well two more actually …. as you already got the first one on the side of the road‼‼‼! And finally after that three notice process … guess what that piggy wiggly gives it to another registrar magic-straight-jacketed clown in a black acting costume ………. In the mean time what have we done usually a whole lot of commercially dishonourable things like argue or go silent when we were not even doing what the higher laws claims we should ‼‼‼‼ don't the road signs warn you three times of most events including where the speed cameras are located see we are blinded by the obvious if we hold a fixed opinion such as common law is the higher law…….. yes it is higher than some law but not all law… and equity sure as eggs is a higher and fairer law as things get properly considered here if properly applied especially if you do so without commercial dishonour welcome to the journey and discovery how deep the rabbit hole really goes instead of only visiting the red-necked-olde-common-law-paper-terrorist-Mr. JACK-RABBIT-PATRIOT hole

Now for the difference between "body" and "one" …..

Public Act 1961 No 43: New Zealand Crimes Act, date of assent: 1 November 1961

Undersigned further claims that all property; corporeal, incorporeal or otherwise, held by Undersigned is held under a Claim of Right as mentioned in accord and satisfaction without limiting the terms and provisions of equity per your :

Judicature Act Public Act (1908 No 89) s443 form 14, 17 within schedules thereof ; and

Summary Offences Act (1981 No 113) s2(1) ; and

Crimes Act (1961 No 43) s53.

[ claim of right, in relation to any act, means a belief that the act is lawful, although that belief may be based on ignorance or mistake of fact or of any matter of law other than the enactment against which the offence is alleged to have been committed ] ; and

anyone/body(including successors, nominees and/or assigns) interfering with Undersigned's unalienable lawful activities, having been served this Notice of Understanding & Intent and Claim of Right, failing to properly dispute or make lawful counterclaim within the customary time, will as counsel can be heard seek a judgement committing you to prison for your contempt and breach of The Law, thereby annulling any claim of good faith or colour of right furthermore such trespass/transgressions will be dealt with in a properly convened court de jure ; and

as inferior courts within NEW ZEALAND are by nature de-facto, thereby bound by the law and equity provisions as currently found within the ;

Judicature Act 1908 Part 3—Rules And Provisions of Law In Judicial Matters Generally: Generally in all matters in which there is any conflict or variance between the rules of equity and the rules of the common law with reference to the same matter the rules of equity shall prevail. Cf: 1882 No 31, s11

Illegal Contracts Act (1970 No 129) s 3 and 4

3 "Illegal contract" defined Subject to section 5 of this Act, for the purposes of this Act the term illegal contract means any contract [governed by New Zealand law] that is illegal at law or in equity, whether the illegality arises from the creation or performance of the contract; and includes a contract which contains an illegal provision, whether that provision is severable or not.

Hist. s3: Words "governed by New Zealand law" inserted on 19 December 2002 by 2002 No 82, s4.

4 Act to bind Crown This Act shall bind the Crown.

Crimes Act 1961 s53 Defence of movable property with claim of right

(1) Every one in peaceable possession of any movable thing under a claim of right, and every one acting under his authority, is protected from criminal responsibility for defending his possession by the use of reasonable force, even against a person entitled by law to possession, if he does not strike or do bodily harm to the other person.

(2) Repealed Compare: 1908 No 32, s78

Hist. s53(2): Repealed on 1 January 1981 by 1980 No 63, s2(2). The repealed s53(2) is listed below for reference. "(2) If the person entitled by law to possession thereupon attempts to take the thing from or otherwise assaults the possessor, or any one acting under his authority, the assault shall be deemed to be without justification or provocation."

Crimes Act 1961 s55 Defence of dwellinghouse

Every one in peaceable possession of a dwellinghouse, and every one lawfully assisting him or acting by his authority, is justified in using such force as is necessary to prevent the forcible breaking and entering of the dwellinghouse by any person if he believes, on reasonable and probable grounds, that there is no lawful justification for the breaking and entering Compare: 1908 No 32,s80,s81; Criminal Code(1954),s40 (Canada)

Crimes Act 1961 s116 Conspiring to defeat justice

Every one is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 7 years who conspires to obstruct, prevent, pervert, or defeat the course of justice [in New Zealand or the course of justice in an overseas jurisdiction]. Compare: 1908 No 32, s137

Crimes Act 1961 s240 Obtaining by deception or causing loss by deception

(1) Every one is guilty of obtaining by deception or causing loss by deception who, by any deception and without claim of right,—

(a) obtains ownership or possession of, or control over, any property, or any privilege, service, pecuniary advantage, benefit, or valuable consideration, directly or indirectly; or

(b) in incurring any debt or liability, obtains credit; or

(c) induces or causes any other person to deliver over, execute, make, accept, endorse, destroy, or alter any document or thing capable of being used to derive a pecuniary advantage; or

(d) causes loss to any other person.

(2) In this section, deception means—

(a) a false representation, whether oral, documentary, or by conduct, where the person making the representation intends to deceive any other person and—

(i) knows that it is false in a material particular; or

(ii) is reckless as to whether it is false in a material particular; or

(b) an omission to disclose a material particular, with intent to deceive any person, in circumstances where there is a duty to disclose it; or

(c) a fraudulent device, trick, or stratagem used with intent to deceive any person.] Compare: 1961 No 43 s246, s247, s270

such malfeasant peace officers are in fact then only trading in the profitable business of conducting, witnessing and facilitating the transactions of security interests and Undersigned further claims; those officers require the consent of both parties evidenced by the Undersigned's signed and sealed written stipulated agreement of all parties in interest in the absence of any material facts or evidence to the contrary, prior to providing any such services : and

all transactions of security interest(s), legitimately requires the consent of both parties and Undersigned hereby notifies all parties that he has never knowingly or willing consented and does henceforth, without dishonour, refused for lack or want of real cause, to partake in any further transaction(s) of any crown security interest issuing under any other Act contrary to his Lord's law as herein stated as; an ambassador, and free man-on-the-land Undersigned is NOT subject to any such contrary Act.

so food for thought ………….

Well during our discovery …….. firstly I am not a royalist, she is no different than you or me as ar as I am concerned … but the funny thing is the imaginary queen of New Zealand or Aussie she did the following things…….

Abbreviated coronation oath of Queen-Elizabeth-the-Second all relevant parts
The Form and Order of Service that is to be performed and the Ceremonies that are to be observed in The Coronation of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II in the Abbey Church of St. Peter, Westminster, on Tuesday, the second day of June, 1953.

CORONATION, n. [a crown.]

1. The act or solemnity of crowning a king or emperor; the act of investing a prince with the insignia of royalty, on his succeeding to the sovereignty.

2. The pomp or assembly attending a coronation.

Coronation-oath, the oath taken by a monarch at their coronation.

GOD SAVE QUEEN ELIZABETH. Then the trumpets shall sound.
IV. The Oath.

The Queen having returned to her Chair (her Majesty having already on Tuesday, the fourth day of November, 1952, in the presence of the two Houses of Parliament, made and signed the Declaration prescribed by Act of Parliament), the Archbishop standing before her shall administer the Coronation Oath, first asking the Queen,

Madam, is your Majesty willing to take the Oath? [coronation oath]

And the Queen answering, I am willing,

Archbishop: Will you solemnly promise and swear to govern the Peoples of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the Union of South Africa, Pakistan and Ceylon, and of your Possessions and other Territories to any of them belonging or pertaining, according to their respective laws and customs?

Queen: I solemnly promise so to do.

Archbishop: Will you to your power cause Law and Justice, in Mercy, to be executed in all your judgements?

Queen: I will.

Archbishop: Will you to the utmost of your power maintain the Laws of God and the true profession of the Gospel?

Queen: All this I promise to do.

before her, shall go to the Altar, and make her solemn Oath in the sight of [The Bible to be brought.] all the people to observe the premisses: laying her right hand upon the Holy Gospel in the great Bible (which was before carried in the procession and is now brought from the altar by the Archbishop, and tendered to her as she kneels upon the steps), and saying these words:

The things which I have here promised, I will perform, and keep. So help me God.

Our gracious Queen: to keep your Majesty ever mindful of the law and the Gospel of God as the Rule for the whole life and government of John-Henry:tian Princes, we present you with this Book, the most valuable thing that this world affords.

And the Moderator shall continue:

Here is Wisdom; This is the royal Law; These are the lively Oracles of God.

The hymn being ended, the Archbishop shall say:

LET US PRAY.

O Lord and heavenly Father, the exalter of the humble and the strength of thy chosen, who by anointing with Oil didst of old make and consecrate kings, priests, and prophets, to teach and govern thy people Israel: Bless and sanctify thy chosen servant Elizabeth, who by our office and ministry is now to be anointed with this Oil, .......

Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth-the-Second, who by the Grace of God is Queen of Great Britain, Northern Ireland, Australia, Canada, New Zealand and Her Other Realms and Territories,

including : Jamaica Antigua and Barbuda, The Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Grenada, St Christopher and Nevis, St Lucia, St Vincent and the Grenadines Trinidad and Tobago Papua New Guinea, the Solomon Islands Tuvalu also known as Ellice Islands British Indian Ocean Territory, Gibraltar, Bermuda, the Falkland Islands, Hong Kong South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands, British Antarctic Territory, St Helena and its dependencies (Ascension and Tristan da Cunha), Montserrat, the British Virgin Islands, the Cayman Islands, Turks and Caicos Islands, Anguilla, the Pitcairn Group of Islands, and the Sovereign Base Areas on Cyprus.

as well as the Head of the Commonwealth, and most importantly Defender of the Faith's coronation crown

An Act Establishing the Coronation Oath, 1689

I. Whereas by the law and ancient usage of this Realm, the Kings and Queens thereof have taken a solemn oath upon the Evangelists at their respective coronations, to maintain the statutes, laws, and customs of the said Realm, and all the people and inhabitants thereof, in their spiritual and civil rights and properties: but forasmuch as the oath itself on such occasion administered, hath heretofore been framed in doubtful words and expressions, with relation to ancient laws and constitutions at this time unknown: to the end therefore that one uniform oath may be in all times to come taken by the Kings and Queens of this Realm, and to them respectively administered at the times of their and every of their coronation: may it please your Majesties that it may be enacted:

II. And be it enacted by the King's and Queen's most excellent majesties, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and the Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, That the oath herein mentioned, and hereafter expressed, shall and may be administered to their most excellent majesties King William and Queen Mary (whom God long preserve) at the time of their coronation, in the presence of all persons that shall be then and there present at the solemnising thereof, by the Archbishop of Canterbury, or the Archbishop of York, or either of them, or any other bishop of this Realm, whom the King's majesty shall thereunto appoint, and who shall be hereby thereunto respectively authorised; which oath followeth, and shall be administered in this manner; that is to say,

III. The archbishop or bishop shall say, "Will you solemnly promise and swear to govern the people of this Kingdom of England, and the dominions thereto belonging, according to the statutes in Parliament agreed on, and the laws and customs of the same?"

The King and Queen shall say, "I solemnly promise so to do."

Archbishop or bishop, "Will you to your power cause law and justice in mercy to be executed in all your judgements?"

King and Queen, "I will."

Archbishop or bishop, "Will you to the utmost of your power maintain the laws of God, the true profession of the gospel and the Protestant reformed religion established by law, and will you preserve unto the bishops and clergy of this Realm, and to the churches committed to their charge, all such rights and privileges as by law do or shall appertain unto them, or any of them?"

After this, the King and Queen laying his and her hand upon the holy Gospels, shall say,

King and Queen, "The things which I have here before promised, I will perform and keep: So help me God."

Then the King and Queen shall kiss the book.

IV. And be it enacted, That the said oath shall be in like manner administered to every King and Queen, who shall succeed to the imperial crown of this Realm, at their respective coronations, by one of the archbishops or bishops of this Realm of England, for the time being, to be thereunto appointed by such King or Queen respectively, and in the presence of all persons that shall be attending, assisting, or otherwise present at such their respective coronations; any law, statute, or usage to the contrary notwithstanding.

Did she Elizabeth-the-Second, who only by the Grace of God is Queen of Great Britain, Northern Ireland, Australia, Canada, New Zealand and Her Other Realms and Territories, Jamaica Antigua and Barbuda, The Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Grenada, St Christopher and Nevis, St Lucia, St Vincent and the Grenadines Trinidad and Tobago Papua New Guinea, the Solomon Islands Tuvalu also known as Ellice Islands British Indian Ocean Territory, Gibraltar, Bermuda, the Falkland Islands, Hong Kong South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands, British Antarctic Territory, St Helena and its dependencies (Ascension and Tristan da Cunha), Montserrat, the British Virgin Islands, the Cayman Islands, Turks and Caicos Islands, Anguilla, the Pitcairn Group of Islands, and the Sovereign Base Areas on Cyprus. as well as the Head of the Commonwealth, and most importantly Defender of the Faith; who by royal styles and titles, for use in relation to New Zealand and all other territories for whose foreign relations Her Government in New Zealand is responsible, shall be known and called as —

Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God Queen of New Zealand and Her Other Realms and Territories, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith— instead of the style and titles at present appertaining to the Crown!!!!! NOT say the king jim bible also known as: the Holy Scriptures is the greatest document their world affords[i.e. the most expensive document to the non-believer, so cant we accept this as true for them and and use it against any clown policy enforcement agent/s?]‼‼‼‼

hey it don't confront me if it was a cookoo-book or cook book to make pavlova or a book on how to eat the green cheese on the moon all that matters is didn't their (the squiggly tails) boss their sovereign lady didn't she say it was so?????? so that must be true also then hey? If not to you at least to them then‼‼

Well reflect the laws of equity back on them as they always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, always, fail to properly consider who you are ‼‼‼‼‼‼! Go look that term up failure of consideration in a good law dictionary … Now instead of jumping straight back into goode red-necked-olde-common-law-paper-terrorist-Mr. JACK-RABBIT-PATRIOT claim making mode …. ask them a few questions after all are you not trying to settle quickly with thine adversary as King Jim I decrees Jesus said?????????

Mat 5:24 Leave there thy gift before the altar, and go thy way; first be reconciled to thy brother, and then come and offer thy gift.

Mat 5:25 Agree with thine adversary quickly, whiles thou art in the way with him; lest at any time the adversary deliver thee to the judge, and the judge deliver thee to the officer, and thou be cast into prison.

Mat 5:26 Verily I say unto thee, Thou shalt by no means come out thence, till thou hast paid the uttermost farthing.

Hey didn't king Jim 1 …. William and Mary and their heirs and successors including Lizzie2 also say it read their coro oath and supporting act that they by promissory oath must uphold… also attached

Mat 5:33 Again, ye have heard that it hath been said by them of old time, Thou shalt not forswear thyself, but shalt perform unto the Lord thine oaths:

Mat 5:34 But I say unto you, Swear not at all; neither by heaven; for it is God's throne:

Mat 5:35 Nor by the earth; for it is his footstool: neither by Jerusalem; for it is the city of the great King.

Mat 5:36 Neither shalt thou swear by thy head, because thou canst not make one hair white or black.

Mat 5:37 But let your communication be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay: for whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil. This is repeated as a second witness in James 5:12 know what the original meanings of these words means not the colloquial or vernacular common day garden variety of the terms is … you will be surprised like a publican means a tax farmer and reveue collector

didn't they said it (I'm only a third party to this) it is not my testimony don't blame me you didn't do your due diligence constable squiggly tail … ignorance of the law especially to an officer of the law is no excuse it never saved those Nazis at Nuremberg neither ‼‼‼!

Then what do or could you do????? …. Well think about it …….

Mat 18:15 Moreover if thy brother shall trespass against thee, go and tell him his fault between thee and him alone: if he shall hear thee, thou hast gained thy brother.

Mat 18:16 But if he will not hear thee, then take with thee one or two more, that in the mouth of two or three witnesses every word may be established.

Mat 18:17 And if he shall neglect to hear them, tell it unto the church: but if he neglect to hear the church, let him be unto thee as an heathen man and a publican.

Mat 18:18 Verily I say unto you, Whatsoever ye shall bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever ye shall loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.

Mat 18:19 Again I say unto you, That if two of you shall agree on earth as touching any thing that they shall ask, it shall be done for them of my Father which is in heaven.

Mat 18:20 For where two or three are gathered together in my name, there am I in the midst of them.

Mat 18:21 Then came Peter to him, and said, Lord, how oft shall my brother sin against me, and I forgive him? till seven times?

Mat 18:22 Jesus saith unto him, I say not unto thee, Until seven times: but, Until seventy times seven.

Mat 18:23 Therefore is the kingdom of heaven likened unto a certain king, which would take account of his servants.

Mat 18:24 And when he had begun to reckon, one was brought unto him, which owed him ten thousand talents.

Mat 18:25 But forasmuch as he had not to pay, his lord commanded him to be sold, and his wife, and children, and all that he had, and payment to be made.

Mat 18:26 The servant therefore fell down, and worshipped him, saying, Lord, have patience with me, and I will pay thee all.

Mat 18:27 Then the lord of that servant was moved with compassion, and loosed him, and forgave him the debt.

Mat 18:28 But the same servant went out, and found one of his fellowservants, which owed him an hundred pence: and he laid hands on him, and took him by the throat, saying, Pay me that thou owest.

Mat 18:29 And his fellowservant fell down at his feet, and besought him, saying, Have patience with me, and I will pay thee all.

Mat 18:30 And he would not: but went and cast him into prison, till he should pay the debt.

Then find the maxims that relate to these ………. Use them equitably knowing that you can be restored fourfould and in this fiat money system that equates to a three fold set off when you do it correctly

2 Samuel 12:5-7 (King James Authorised Bible )

5 And David's anger was greatly kindled against the man; and he said to Nathan, As the LORD liveth, the man that hath done this thing shall surely die :

6 And he shall restore the lamb fourfold, because he did this thing, and because he had no pity.

7 And Nathan said to David, Thou art the man. Thus saith the LORD God of Israel, I anointed thee king over Israel, and I delivered thee out of the hand of Saul ;

Luke 19:8 And Zacchaeus stood, and said unto the Lord: Behold, Lord, the half of my goods I give to the poor; and if I have taken any thing from any man by false accusation, I restore him fourfold.

Now didn't their queenie sovereign lady at her coronation oath say this was the greatest document the world affords????? So next time they get you to swear on the bible don't let go of it once you have it in your hands it is your shield against them thar deceivers ‼‼‼‼‼‼!

Therewith endeth todays lesson as I have to go out and see if we can make another QC not be a queer c\/*^ cant say that derogatory word we'll go and see if he upholds Elizabeth-the-Second, who only by the Grace of God is Queen of Great Britain, Northern Ireland, Australia, Canada, New Zealand and Her Other Realms and Territories, Jamaica Antigua and Barbuda, The Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Grenada, St Christopher and Nevis, St Lucia, St Vincent and the Grenadines Trinidad and Tobago Papua New Guinea, the Solomon Islands Tuvalu also known as Ellice Islands British Indian Ocean Territory, Gibraltar, Bermuda, the Falkland Islands, Hong Kong South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands, British Antarctic Territory, St Helena and its dependencies (Ascension and Tristan da Cunha), Montserrat, the British Virgin Islands, the Cayman Islands, Turks and Caicos Islands, Anguilla, the Pitcairn Group of Islands, and the Sovereign Base Areas on Cyprus. as well as the Head of the Commonwealth, and most importantly Defender of the Faith; who by royal styles and titles, for use in relation to New Zealand and all other territories for whose foreign relations Her Government in New Zealand is responsible, shall be known and called as —

Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God Queen of New Zealand and Her Other Realms and Territories, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith— instead of the style and titles at present appertaining to the Crown!!!!! Or her majesty the queen in right of New Zealand along with all its constitutor debts and have him thrown out as an imposter ‼‼‼‼‼‼!

You good people have more than enough to content with today

Blessing to all who come and remain in peace to the rest ………… away with you go fight somewhere else and breach the lords and kings commanded peace

Statute of Westminster the first doesn't it say ……..

(1275) 3 Edw. 1, c. 1---(Statutes of Westminster the First): so much of that Act as is stated in the words "The King willeth and commandeth. . . .

FIRST the King willeth and commandeth, That the Peace of holy Church and of the Land be well kept and maintained in all Points; and that common Right be done [to all,1] as well Poor as Rich, without respect of Persons. 1 in all translations.

. . . .that common right be done to all, as well poor as rich, without respect of persons.", [being the English translation of part of the authentic text of that Act as it appears in the edition called Statutes of the Realm].

DECONSTRUCT THIS PUPPY FOR YOUR RESPECTIVE STATE

Which "New Zealand"?

From the IMMIGRATION ACT 1987:

"New Zealand means any land territory within the territorial limits of New Zealand; and includes—

(a) The internal waters of New Zealand; and

(b) The Ross Dependency (including any ice shelf); and

(c) For the purposes of sections 16(2)(a), 24(3), 27(3), and 137(2)(a) of this Act, the territorial sea of New Zealand"

From Bouvier's 1856:

TERRITORY. A part of a country, separated from the rest, and subject to a particular jurisdiction. The word is derived from terreo, and is so called because the magistrate within his jurisdiction has the power of inspiring a salutary fear. Dictum cat ab eo quod magistratus intra fines ejus terrendi jus habet. Henrion de Pansy, Auth. Judiciare, 98. In speaking of the

ecclesiastical jurisdictions, Francis Duaren observes, that the ecclesiastics are said not to have territory, nor the power of arrest or removal, and are not unlike the Roman magistrates of whom Gellius says vocationem habebant non prehen-sionem. De Sacris Eccles. Minist. lib. 1,

cap. 4. In the sense it is used in the constitution of the United States, it signifies a portion of the country subject to and belonging to the United States, which is not within the boundary of any of them.

2. The constitution of the United States, art. 4, s. 3, provides, that "the congress shall have power to dispose of, and make all needful rules and regulations respecting the territory or other property of the United States; and nothing in this constitution shall be construed, so as to preclude the claims of the United States or of any state."

3. Congress possesses the power to erect territorial governments within the territory of the United States; the power of congress over such territory is exclusive and universal, and their legislation is subject to no control, unless in the case of ceded territory, as far as it may be affected by stipulations in the cessions, or by the ordinance of 1787, 3 Story's L. U. S. 2073, under which any part of it has been settled. Story on the Const. §1322; Rawle on the Const: 237; 1 Kent's Com. 243, 359; 1 Pet. S. C. Rep. 511, 542, 517.

From the above we see that, in the U.S., the "territories" are distinct from the "States".

Even today, Australia still has the "Northern Territory", which is not a State, and Canada has the "Northwest Territories" and "Yukon Territory", which are not Provinces.

Which begs the question of exactly where is the "territory" of New Zealand?

From the CITIZENSHIP ACT 1977:

"New Zealand includes the Cook Islands, Niue, Tokelau, and the Ross Dependency:"

Most statutory definitions of New Zealand refer to the Territorial Sea, Contiguous Zone, And Exclusive Economic Zone Act 1977, and that Act tells us:

"New Zealand (except for the purposes of Part 2 of this Act and section 29 of this Act) includes the Ross Dependency:"

The only Act where New Zealand is defined in the way everyone expects it to be:

Injury Prevention, Rehabilitation, and Compensation Act 2001 - section 16 (see below)

SUMMARY of definitions in NEW ZEALAND ACTS:

1) New Zealand = ... New Zealand (circular definition)

COOK ISLANDS CONSTITUTION ACT 1964

HEALTH AND SAFETY IN EMPLOYMENT ACT 1992

IMMIGRATION ACT 1987

MARITIME TRANSPORT ACT 1994

NIUE ACT 1966

2) New Zealand includes the Ross Dependency

ANTARCTIC MARINE LIVING RESOURCES ACT 1981

BIRTHS, DEATHS, AND MARRIAGES REGISTRATION ACT 1995

CIVIL UNION ACT 2004

CORONERS ACT 1988

*** TERRITORIAL SEA, CONTIGUOUS ZONE, AND EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE ACT 1977

3) New Zealand defined in terms of the Territorial Sea and/or Continental Shelf (see *** directly above, which puts us in the waters directly off the Ross Dependency)

ADMIRALTY ACT 1973

AVIATION CRIMES ACT 1972

BIOSECURITY ACT 1993

CRIMES ACT 1961

CRIMES (INTERNATIONALLY PROTECTED PERSONS, UN & ETC.) ACT 1980

CRIMES OF TORTURE ACT 1989

CUSTOMS AND EXCISE ACT 1996

DRIFTNET PROHIBITION ACT 1991

ENERGY RESOURCES LEVY ACT 1976

FISHERIES ACT 1983

FISHERIES ACT 1996

GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT 1985

INCOME TAX ACT 2004

MARITIME CRIMES ACT 1999

NEW ZEALAND NUCLEAR FREE ZONE, DISARMAMENT, AND ARMS CONTROL ACT 1987

NGATI RUANUI CLAIMS SETTLEMENT ACT 2003

4) Cook Islands, Niue, Tokelau

From the CITIZENSHIP ACT 1977:

"New Zealand includes the Cook Islands, Niue, Tokelau, and the Ross Dependency:"

From the CITIZENSHIP (WESTERN SAMOA) ACT 1982:

"In this Act the term New Zealand does not include the Cook Islands, Niue, or Tokelau."

From the COPYRIGHT ACT 1994:

"New Zealand includes Tokelau:"

From the DECIMAL CURRENCY ACT 1964:

"New Zealand includes the territories to which this Act extends by virtue of section 3 of this Act:

3 Application of Act to Cook Islands and Tokelau

This Act shall extend to and be in force in the following territories:

(a) The Cook Islands:

(b) [Tokelau]."

5) The one Act with a "real" land based definition (notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained within Te Ture Whenua Mãori /Mãori Land Act 1993) !

From the INJURY PREVENTION, REHABILITATION, AND COMPENSATION ACT 2001:

16 New Zealand

(1) New Zealand means—

(a) the North Island, the South Island, Stewart Island, the Chatham Islands, and all other land territories, islands, and islets lying between the 162nd degree of east longitude and the 173rd degree of west longitude and between the 33rd and 53rd parallels of south latitude; and

(b) those islands situated in the South Pacific Ocean lying between the 177th and 180th degrees of west longitude and between the 29th and 32nd parallels of south latitude, commonly known as the Kermadec Group; and

(c) those parts of the internal waters of New Zealand (as defined by section 4 of the Territorial Sea, Contiguous Zone, and Exclusive Economic Zone Act 1977) adjacent to the land territories, islands, and islets

referred to in paragraphs (a) and (b); and

(d) those parts of the territorial sea of New Zealand (as defined by section 3 of the Territorial Sea, Contiguous Zone, and Exclusive Economic Zone Act 1977) adjacent to the land territories, islands, and islets referred to in paragraphs (a) and (b); and

(e) any installation or drilling rig that—

(i) is constructed, erected, placed, or used in, on, or above those parts of the continental shelf adjacent to the land territories, islands, and islets referred to in paragraphs (a) and (b); and

(ii) has the purpose of the exploration of the continental shelf or the exploitation of the mineral or other natural non-living resources of the continental shelf.

(2) In subsection (1)(e),—

(a) continental shelf has the meaning given to it in section 2(1) of the Continental Shelf Act 1964:

(b) installation and drilling rig include—

(i) any installation or drilling rig, whether permanent or temporary:

(ii) any aircraft, floating platform, ship, or other device that is for the time being in, on, or above the continental shelf and is being used in connection with any installation or drilling rig.

(3) A person remains in New Zealand when he or she—

(a) embarks in New Zealand on an aircraft or ship or some other means of conveyance by air or sea—

(i) to travel from 1 place in New Zealand to another place in New Zealand; or

(ii) to return to his or her place of embarkation without disembarking at any other place; and

(b) does not go beyond a limit of 300 nautical miles from any point or points in New Zealand."

6) Dominion of New Zealand

From the ATOMIC ENERGY ACT 1945:

"New Zealand includes any territory subject to the protection, mandate, trusteeship, or authority of the Government of the Dominion of New Zealand, including the Cook Islands:"

From the COOK ISLANDS ACT 1915:

"New Zealand means the Dominion of New Zealand exclusive of the Cook Islands:"

From the NEW ZEALAND BOUNDARIES ACT 1863 (Imperial Legislation) :

"2 Boundaries of New Zealand

The Colony of New Zealand shall for the purposes of the said Act and for all other purposes whatever be deemed to comprise all territories, islands, and countries lying between the 162nd degree of east longitude and the 173rd degree of west longitude, and between the 33rd and 53rd parallels of south latitude."

From the ACTS INTERPRETATION ACT 1924:

"The colony, this colony, the Dominion, and New Zealand, when used as a territorial description, mean the Dominion of New Zealand, comprising all islands and territories within the limits thereof for the time being other than the Cook Islands, [and do not include [Tokelau]] [or Niue]:"

There is apparently NO legislation, Imperial or otherwise, presently in force "in New Zealand" which defines the "Dominion of New Zealand"!

From Bouvier's 1856:

DOMINION. The right of the owner of a thing to use it or dispose of it at his pleasure. See Domain;

DOMAIN. It signifies sometimes, dominion, territory governed - sometimes, possession, estate - and sometimes, land about the mansion house of a lord. By domain is also understood the right to dispose at our pleasure of what belongs to us.

2. A distinction has been made between property and domain. The former is said to be that quality which is conceived to be in the thing itself, considered as belonging to such or such person, exclusively of all others. By the latter is understood that right which the owner has of disposing of the thing. Hence domain and property are said to be correlative terms; the one is the active right to dispose, the other a passive quality which follows the thing, and places it at the disposition of the owner. 3 Toull. n. 8 3. But this distinction is too subtle for practical use.

7) "Realm" of New Zealand

From the INTERPRETATION ACT 1999:

"New Zealand or similar words referring to New Zealand, when used as a territorial description, mean the islands and territories within the Realm of New Zealand; but do not include the self-governing state of the Cook Islands, the self-governing State of Niue, Tokelau, or the Ross Dependency:"

So according to the Interpretation Act 1999, we are no longer dealing with the Dominion of New Zealand, but the Realm of New Zealand. This "Realm" only appears one other place in legislation:

From the FLAGS, EMBLEMS, AND NAMES PROTECTION ACT 1981:

"The New Zealand Flag shall be the symbol of the Realm, Government, and people of New Zealand."

It appears that the "Realm of New Zealand" is wherever the ensign/flag of the 1902 Royal Wellington Yacht Club flies!

From Bouvier's 1856

EN'SIGN, n. en'sine. [L. insigne, insignia, from signum, a mark impressed, a sign.]

1. The flag or banner of a military band; a banner of colours; a standard; a figured cloth or piece of silk, attached to a staff, and usually with figures, colours or arms thereon, borne by an officer at the head of a company, troop or other band.

2. Any signal to assemble or to give notice.

He will lift up an ensign to the nations. Is.5.

Ye shall be left as an ensign on a hill. Is.30.

3. A badge; a mark of distinction, rank or office; as ensigns of power or virtue.

4. The officer who carries the flag or colours, being the lowest commissioned officer in a company of infantry.

5. Naval ensign, is a large banner hoisted on a staff and carried over the poop or stern of a ship; used to distinguish ships of different nations, or to characterize different equadrons of the same navy.

EN'SIGN-BEARER, n. He that carries the flag; an ensign.

Take a look at this definition of land…….

From the Te Ture Whenua Mãori/Mãori Land Act section 4

…………..[kaitiaki means guardian]

[land—

(a) means—

(i) Maori land, General land, and Crown land that is on the landward side of mean high water springs; and

(ii) Maori freehold land that is on the seaward side of mean high water springs; but

(b) does not include the public foreshore and seabed]

lease includes a tenancy at will, and any other tenancy that confers a leasehold interest upon the tenant, whether at law or in equity; and the terms sublease, lessee, and sublessee have corresponding meanings:

Note that this is a new definition introduced by the Foreshore & Seabed legislation. I am intrigued by the word "springs". When I hear that word I don't think ocean or beach, I think way up in the mountains. Is the Crown claiming the mountain tops?

In section 4 we are told:

Road has the same meaning as in section 315 of the Local Government Act 1974:

and that says:

Road means the whole of any land which is within a district, and which_

(a) Immediately before the commencement of this Part of this Act was a road or street or public highway; or

(b) Immediately before the inclusion of any area in the district was a public highway within that area; or

(c) Is laid out by the council as a road or street after the commencement of this Part of this Act; or

(d) Is vested in the council for the purpose of a road as shown on a deposited survey plan; or

(e) Is vested in the council as a road or street pursuant to any other enactment;_

and includes_

(f) Except where elsewhere provided in this Part of this Act, any access way or service lane which before the commencement of this Part of this Act was under the control of any council [or is laid out or constructed by or vested in any council as an access way or service lane] or is declared [ ] by the Minister of Works and Development as an access way or service lane after the commencement of this Part of this Act [or is declared by the Minister of Lands as an access way or service lane on or after the 1st day of April 1988]:

(g) Every square or place intended for use of the public generally, and every bridge, culvert, drain, ford, gate, building, or other thing belonging thereto or lying upon the line or within the limits thereof;_

but, except as provided in the [[Transit New Zealand Act 1989]] or in any regulations under that Act, does not include a motorway within the meaning of that Act:

Points of interest:

From (a) - road, street and public highway are distinct things From (b) - A public highway did not become a road until it was included in a "district"

From (c) - District Councils create "streets" or "roads", but not "public highways/or byways"

From the last line - does not include a "motorway"

From the ADMIRALTY ACT 1973:

"New Zealand territorial waters'' means all waters within the outer limits of [the territorial sea of New Zealand (as defined in section 3 of the Territorial Sea and Exclusive Economic Zone Act 1977)]; and includes the waters of any lake, river, or stream

8.Jurisdiction of High Court in prize—

(1)The [High Court] shall be a permanent Prize Court within the meaning of the Acts of the United Kingdom known as the Prize Acts 1864 to 1939, and those Acts shall continue in force as part of the law of New Zealand

From the IMMIGRATION ACT 1987:

"New Zealand'' means any land territory within the territorial limits of New Zealand; and includes

(a)The internal waters of New Zealand; and

(b)The Ross Dependency (including any ice shelf); and

(c)For the purposes of sections 16(2)(a), 24(3), 27(3), and 137(2)(a) of this Act, the territorial sea of New Zealand[; and

[(d)For the purposes of section 137(2)(aa) of this Act, the area of sea adjacent to New Zealand and bounded by the outer limits of the contiguous zone of New Zealand

"Passport'' means a document that is issued by or on behalf of the Government of any country, being a document that purports to establish the identity and nationality of the holder and that confers on the holder the right to enter the country the Government of which has issued the document

From the ADMINISTRATION ACT 1969:

"Commonwealth'' means the Commonwealth of Nations; and includes every territory for whose international relations the Government of any country of the Commonwealth is responsible

"Commonwealth country'' means a country that is a member of the Commonwealth; and includes every territory for whose international relations the Government of that country is responsible

"Commonwealth country'' means a country that is a member of the British Commonwealth of Nations; and includes every territory for whose international relations the Government of that country is responsible; and also includes the Republic of Ireland as if that country were a member of the British Commonwealth of Nations:

From the AVIATIONS CRIMES ACT 1972:

"Country'' includes any territory for whose international relations the Government of a country is responsible and to which the extradition treaty and the Hague Convention or, as the case may be, the Montreal Convention, extends:

From the CARE OF CHILD ACT 2004:

"country'' includes any State, territory, province, or other part of a country

In New Zealand Law there is no meaning for the word "born" There is however the word "Still-Born" witch means: "Still-birth'' means the issue from its mother of a still-born child:

"Still-born child'' means a dead foetus that

(a)Weighed 400g or more when it issued from its mother or

(b)Issued from its mother after the 20th week of pregnancy

From the COMMONWEALTH COUNTRIES ACT 1977:

6.Consequential amendment and repeals

(1)Section 4 of the Acts Interpretation Act 1924 is hereby consequentially amended by inserting, after the definition of the term Committed for trial, the following definitions

"`Commonwealth citizen' means a person who is recognised by the law of a Commonwealth country as being a citizen of that country:

" 'Commonwealth country' means a country that is an independent sovereign member of the Commonwealth:

From the COPY RIGHT AMENDMENT ACT 1999:

"`Convention country' means an entity (whether a state, part of a state, a territory for whose international relations a state is responsible, a political union, an international organisation, or any other entity) that is a party to an international agreement or arrangement relating to performers' rights:''

From the CRIMES ACT 1961

"Person'', "owner'', and other words and expressions of the like kind, include the Crown and any public body or local authority, and any board, society, or company, and any other body of persons, whether incorporated or not, and the inhabitants of the district of any local authority, in relation to such acts and things as it or they are capable of doing or owning

"Territorial waters'', in relation to any country [other than New Zealand], means such part of the sea adjacent to the coast of that country as is within the territorial sovereignty of that country; and includes ports, harbours, rivers, and other places in which at the commencement of this Act the Admiralty of England has jurisdiction (whether exclusive or not) in respect of offences of any kind committed on board Commonwealth ships

["claim of right'', in relation to any act, means a belief that the act is lawful, although that belief may be based on ignorance or mistake of fact or of any matter of law other than the enactment against which the offence is alleged to have been committed

From the DOMICILE ACT 1976:

In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires

"Country'' means a territory of a type in which, immediately before the commencement of this Act, a person could have been domiciled

From the EXTRADITION ACT 1999:

"Country'' includes any State, territory, province, or other part of a country

From the GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATION ACT 1994'':

"Locality'', in relation to New Zealand, means an identifiable area within a region:

From the PROPERTY RELATIONSHIP ACT 1976:

"Commonwealth country''

(a)means a country that is an independent sovereign member of the Commonwealth; and

(b)includes every territory for whose international relations the Government of such a country is responsible; and

(c)also includes the Republic of Ireland as if it were an independent sovereign member of the Commonwealth

From the LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT 2002:

"local authority'' means a regional council or territorial authority

"territorial authority'' means a city council or a district council named in Part 2 of Schedule

BIOSECURITY ACT 1993:

"New Zealand territory'' means the [land and the waters] enclosed by the outer limits of the territorial sea (as described in section 3 of the Territorial Sea and Exclusive Economic Zone Act 1977):

"Arrive in New Zealand''

(a)In relation to an aircraft, means to land (whether or not on land) in New Zealand territory after a flight originating outside New Zealand territory

(b)In relation to any other craft, means to anchor, berth, or come ashore in New Zealand territory after a voyage originating outside New Zealand territory

(c)In relation to a person, means to reach land within New Zealand territory after a flight or voyage originating outside New Zealand territory:

"Region'', in relation to a unitary authority, means the region in respect of which it has the functions, duties, and powers of a regional council:

From the TERRITORIAL SEA[, CONTIGUOUS ZONE,] AND EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE ACT 1977:

PART 1 - THE TERRITORIAL SEA OF NEW ZEALAND

3.The territorial sea

The territorial sea of New Zealand comprises those areas of the sea having, as their inner limits, the baseline described in sections 5 and 6 [and 6A] of this Act and, as their outer limits, a line measured seaward from that baseline, every point of which line is distant 12 nautical miles from the nearest point of the baseline.

5.Baseline of territorial sea

(1)Except as otherwise provided in section 6 [or section 6A] of this Act, the baseline from which the breadth of the territorial sea of New Zealand is measured shall be the low-water mark along the coast of New Zealand, including the coast of all islands.

(2)For the purposes of this section, a low-tide elevation that lies wholly or partly within the breadth of sea that would be territorial sea if all low-tide elevations were disregarded for the purpose of the measurement of the breadth of the territorial sea shall be treated as an island

6.Baseline of territorial sea adjacent to bay

In the case of the sea adjacent to a bay, the baseline from which the breadth of the territorial sea is measured—

(a)Where the bay has only one mouth and the distance between the low-water marks of the natural entrance points of the bay does not exceed 24 nautical miles, shall be a straight line joining those low-water marks; and

(b)Where, because of the presence of islands, the bay has more than one mouth and the distances between the low-water marks of the natural entrance points of each mouth added together do not exceed 24 nautical miles, shall be a series of straight lines across each of the mouths so as to join those low-water marks; and

(c)Where neither paragraph (a) nor paragraph (b) of this section applies, shall be a straight line 24 nautical miles in length drawn from low-water mark to low-water mark within the bay in such a manner as to enclose the maximum area of water that is possible with a line of that length

6A.Straight baselines—

(1)Subject to section 6 of this Act, in the following circumstances the method of drawing straight lines joining points may be employed in drawing the baseline from which the breadth of the territorial sea is measured:

(a)Where a river flows directly into the sea

(b)Where the coast is highly unstable because of the presence of a delta or other natural conditions:

(c)Where the coast is deeply indented

(d)Where there is a fringe of islands along the coast in its immediate vicinity.

(2)For the purposes of subsection (1) of this section, the points between which straight lines may be drawn are

(a)In a case where a river flows directly into the sea, a point at each side of the river's mouth on the low-water line of the river's banks

(b)In a case where the coast is highly unstable because of the presence of a delta or other natural conditions, points along the furtherest [sic: furthest] seaward extent of the low-water line:

(c)In any other case, points that are appropriate in the circumstances

(3)Where it is necessary to determine the points between which straight lines may be drawn for the purposes of paragraph (b) or paragraph (c) of subsection (2) of this section,— (a)The following rules shall be observed

(i)Straight baselines shall not depart to any appreciable extent from the general direction of the coast:

(ii)Sea areas lying within straight baselines shall be sufficiently closely linked to the land of New Zealand to be internal waters of New Zealand

(iii)Straight baselines shall be drawn to and from low-tide elevations only where lighthouses or similar installations, which are permanently above sea level, have been built on the low-tide elevations or where the drawing of baselines to and from such elevations has received general international recognition; and

(b)Economic interests peculiar to the region concerned, the reality and the importance of which are clearly evidenced by long usage, may be taken into account.

(4)Where, in a case where the coast is highly unstable because of the presence of a delta or other natural conditions, a straight line has been drawn pursuant to this section, that line remains the baseline, notwithstanding any subsequent regression of the low-water line, until it is changed in accordance with this Act.]

Cf United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, articles 7 and

From the CITIZENSHIP ACT 1977:

"Crown service under the New Zealand Government'' means the service of the Crown under the Government of New Zealand or under the Government of a New Zealand mandated territory or New Zealand trust territory, whether that service is in any part of Her Majesty's realms and territories or elsewhere; and includes employment in any of the State Services, as that term is defined in section 2 of the [State Sector Act 1988

"Protectorate'' means a State or territory that is declared by Her Majesty by Order in Council to be a protectorate for the purposes of the British Nationality Act 1948 (UK):

"Alien'' means a person who does not have the status of a New Zealand citizen, a Commonwealth citizen (British subject), a British protected person, or an Irish citizen

From the CIVIL AVIATION ACT 1990:

(2)For the purposes of the Convention the word "territory'' means not only the metropolitan territory of a State but also all other territories for the foreign relations of which that State is responsible.

"`Australia' means the Commonwealth of Australia; and, when used in a geographical sense, includes any external territory of Australia

From the Building Act 2004

`territorial authority'' means a city council or district council named in Part 2 of Schedule 2 of the Local Government Act 2002; and

(a)in relation to land within the district of a territorial authority, or a building on or proposed to be built on any such land, means that territorial authority; and

(b)in relation to any part of a coastal marine area (within the meaning of the Resource Management Act 1991) that is not within the district of a territorial authority, or a building on or proposed to be built on any such part, means the territorial authority whose district is adjacent to that part

From the BUILDING SOCIETIES ACT 1965:

"Land'' has the same meaning as in the Property Law Act 1952; and includes a licensee's interest under any licence to occupy within the meaning of [[Part 7A of the Land Transfer Act 1952]] or under a deferred payment licence within the meaning of the Land Act 1948:

From the THE PROPERTY LAW ACT 1952:

`Land'' includes all estates and interests, whether freehold or chattel, in real property

`Land under the Land Transfer Act 1952'', or any equivalent expression, means estates or interests registered under that Act

"Property'' includes real and personal property, and any estate or interest in any property real or personal, and any debt, and any thing in action, and any other right or interest:

Land Transfer Act 1952

"Land'' includes messuages, tenements, and hereditaments, corporeal and incorporeal, of every kind and description, and every estate or interest therein, together with all paths, passages, ways, waters, watercourses, liberties, easements, and privileges thereunto appertaining, plantations, gardens, mines, minerals, and quarries, and all trees and timber thereon or thereunder lying or being, unless specially excepted:

`Private land'' means any land which is for the time being held in fee simple by any person other than [Her Majesty]:

From the Te Ture Whenua Mãori/Mãori Land Act 1993:

Part 6 Status of Land

129.All land to have particular status for purposes of Act

(1)For the purposes of this Act, all land in New Zealand shall have one of the following statuses

(a)Maori customary land

(b)Maori freehold land

(c)General land owned by Maori

(d)General land

(e)Crown land

(f)Crown land reserved for Maori

(2)For the purposes of this Act

(a)Land that is held by Maori in accordance with tikanga Maori shall have the status of Maori customary land

(b)Land, the beneficial ownership of which has been determined by the Maori Land Court by freehold order, shall have the status of Maori freehold land

(c)Land (other than Maori freehold land) that has been alienated from the Crown for a subsisting estate in fee simple shall, while that estate is beneficially owned by [a Maori or by a group of] persons of whom a majority are Maori, have the status of General land owned by Maori

(d)Land (other than Maori freehold land and General land owned by Maori) that has been alienated from the Crown for a subsisting estate in fee simple shall have the status of General land

(e)Land (other than Maori customary land and Crown land reserved for Maori) that has not been alienated from the Crown for a subsisting estate in fee simple shall have the status of Crown land:

(f)Land (other than Maori customary land) that has not been alienated from the Crown for a subsisting estate in fee simple but is set aside or reserved for the use or benefit of Maori shall have the status of Crown land reserved for Maori.

(3)Notwithstanding anything in subsection (2) of this section, where any land had, immediately before the commencement of this Act, any particular status (being a status referred to in subsection (1) of this section) by virtue of any provision of any enactment or of any order made or any thing done in accordance with any such provision, that land shall continue to have that particular status unless and until it is changed in accordance with this Act.

Cf 1953 No 94 s 2(1)

"land"

(a)means

(i)Maori land, General land, and Crown land that is on the landward side of mean high water springs; and

(ii)Maori freehold land that is on the seaward side of mean high water springs; but

(b)does not include the public foreshore and seabed

From the CADASTRAL SURVEY ACT 2002:

`land'' includes

(a)subsoil, airspace, and water and marine areas; and

(b)interests in or over land

"tenure'' means the kind of right or title by which land is held

"tenure system'' means a system that provides for the creation and transfer of interests in land

"cadastral survey'' means the determination and description of the spatial extent (including boundaries) of interests under a tenure system

Here the answer to the Fee Simple title we have on "Land" it's a "kind of right"...... but not actually "a right"

CONSERVATION ACT 1987:

"Private land'' means any land that

(a)Is Maori land within the meaning of [Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993]; or

(b)Has been alienated from the Crown

Once you work out this and I bet a pound of gold to a knob of goats turd that your relevant Aussie state ones are very, very, very, similar ‼‼‼‼! I am not going to do yor donkey work except plant the seed …….. Use your computer to word search the appropriate words out of your own de facto legislation/acts …… come on ….. make that today's challenge task what you read was the work of three guys over a few days beat us

Oh if you think that is the answer you haven't even begun the journey….

Then go find yor equivalents on this

"HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF NEW ZEALAND" for whatever reason, it is known as a publicly registered UNITED STATES SECURITY EXCHANGE COMMISSION ("US SEC") company Reg. No.0000216105 SIC: 8888 - Foreign Governments State location: Q2 | Fiscal Year End: 0630 which by due diligence was an easily obtained public record is registered as indebted to an American corporation on their Stock Exchange ... somehow I do not think that this is a Sovereign Lady who is the woman the judge, prosecutor and police, all took oath to and "We the People" we all know as Queen Elizabeth-the-Second, by the Grace of God, Queen of New Zealand and Her Realms and Territories, Head of the Commonwealth, and Defender of the Faith; ... however, is instead .........

Whose publicly listed address(es) for service are:

Business Address: 1 THE TERRACE
NATIONAL PROVIDENT BLDG
WELLINGTON NEW ZEALAND Q2 6015

Mailing Address:
C/O NEW ZEALAND DEBT MANAGEMENT OFFICE
TREASURY 1 TERRACE PO BOX 3724
WELLINGTON NEW ZEALAND Q2 6015

Anybody doubting this, could and would like I did, is easily and readily available to anyone making a reasonable effort to study it by doing their own due diligence be able to verify this by simply searching the following hyperlink :

http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&SIC=8888&owner... and then look up : the company : 0000216105 HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF NEW ZEALAND Q2 and see that this is indebted to the tune (plus interest after several years accumulating) of :

SECURITIES REGISTERED (As of the close of the last fiscal period)

Title of Issue

Amounts as to which

registration is effective

Names of exchanges

on which registered

Twenty-five Year 9 7/8%

Bonds Due January 15, 2011

US$150,000,000

New York Stock Exchange

Name and address of person authorised to receive notices and communications from the Securities and Exchange Commission:

HER EXCELLENCY MS. ROSEMARY BANKS

Permanent Representative of the New Zealand Permanent Mission to the United Nations

One United Nations Plaza 25th Floor

New York, NY 10017

Copies to:

JOHN E. ESTES

Sullivan & Cromwell

101 Collins Street

Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia

See see the UN and Melbourne still have a clown liar oops sorry lawyer controlling New Zealand ‼‼‼‼! Bet you we have one over here controlling Aussie‼‼‼! Yes while looking I saw queen in right of Queensland Victoria and others also for the Canadian provinces etc., and others wake up guys …. Stop fighting squabbling and bickering if you want to reclaim your Almighty-God give birthrights stop doing things that don't produce results ‼‼‼‼! Case law precedences are …. read highlighted part below

MAXIMS and PRINCIPLES of LAW to be RELIED UPON :

I. All men and women are without excuse to not know that The Law is written "upon their hearts and in their minds", and that the origin of all law and commerce exists participating in the doctrine of maintaining 'clean hands in equity'

II. AND the integrity of telling the whole truth;

III. AND that every living-breathing-soul shall be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God:, the powers that be, are ordained of God.

IV. MOREOVER, Whosoever therefore resisteth that power, resisteth the ordinance of the very God they invoke the help thereof to maintain their office: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation. For honourable rulers are not a terror to good works, but only to the evil.

V. AND that Truth as a valid statement of reality, is sovereign in commerce and where there is a conflict in opinions, the word of God prevails as true, over man's words.

VI. AND an un-rebutted affidavit stands as what is true in commerce between the parties.

VII. AND an un-rebutted affidavit is acted upon as the judgement in commerce.

VIII. GUARANTEED — so that all men are neither held nor placed in an untenable position of peonage or involuntary servitude, all men shall have equitably prevailing available to them, a remedy by the due course and process of law. If a remedy does not appear to exist, or if the existing remedy appears to have been subverted, then one may equitably create a remedy for themselves and endow it with credibility by expressing such in their affidavit.

a. (Ignorance of these facts might be an excuse, however ignorance of the law is never a valid excuse/reason for the commission of any wrongful/inequitable act or crime, when The Law is easily and readily available to anyone making a reasonable effort to study it, and one acting as an officer of the law would be foolish to not do so or have it construed against them as tantamount to fraud).

b. notwithstanding all of the above, and that all higher laws are written upon the hearts and minds of all men, poor as well as rich without respect of the person of man any excuse is an admission as to the primary liability of the maker of such, and silence and non-response, is one's own honourable indication as to their :

c. tacit assent or procuration/consent, passive acquiescence, cognovit affirmative, acceptance by silence, admission of guilt, or any part of their confession or avoidance plea(s), that they now have honourably prescribed and preordained under a clean hands in equity doctrine that

d. one or more of the options available therein were as stipulated, elected by them, furthermore they were asked to provide with a duty of care/trust responsibility and indemnified (fourfold) commercial liability as to certain evidence that are well established prerequisites for any honourable settlement for commercial bills and letters of request by the comity between the parties allowing for the honourable settlement without laches of any previously raised outstanding or contradictory matter(s).

IX. All incorporated or unincorporated bodies of government are based upon properly bonded: commercial affidavits, commercial contracts, constitutions, commercial liens and commercial distresses, hence, governments cannot lawfully exercise the power to expunge commercial processes, without first expunging themselves and the de jure source of their authority.

X. The legitimate political power of any corporate entity is incontrovertibly dependent upon its possession of commercial bonds and insurance instruments against any and all public hazard/liability/ies, because no bond means; no legitimate authority/responsibility, >> no real or de jure power of any official signature, >> no real corporate political power, >> no privilege to exercise/operate any statute(s) as the corporate vehicle/presumed transmitting utility they claim.

XI. That any corporate legal powers at best are; secondary to the commercial guarantors. Case law on its own is not a responsible substitute for a Bond and would only foolishly be accepted as such, in lieu of a bond.

XII. All municipal corporations including; cities, counties, districts, local, state and national governments, have no commercial reality without proper bonding of their entity, its vehicle (statutes), and its effects (the execution of its rulings).

XIII. In commerce, the failure of this is therefore without excuse, itself being nothing more or less than tantamount to fraud or a criminal act for the Officer of a Political/Public Office to not receive and report a claim to its Bonding Company, and it would in the same manner be a crime for the agent of a Bonding Company to not pay on the said claim.

XIV. If a Bonding Company does not get its own malfeasant public official prosecuted for criminal malpractice within sixty (60) days, then it is required to pay the full face value of a defaulted lien process (at 90 days).

XV. Except for a Jury, it is also a fatal offense for any person, even an honourable Judge, to impair or to expunge, without a counter-affidavit, any affidavit or any commercial process based upon an Affidavit if one was provided to support the originating claim.

XVI. Judicial, non-jury commercial judgments and orders originate from a limited liability entity called a municipal corporation, hence must be reinforced by a Commercial Affidavit and a Commercial Liability Bond.

XVII. A foreclosure by summary[1] judgment done without a commercial bond is a fatal violation of commercial law.

XVIII. Corporate Governments cannot make un-bonded rulings or statutes, which control commerce, free enterprise citizens, or sole proprietorships, without suspending commerce by a general and public declaration of martial law.

XIX. It is a tax fraud to use statute courts to settle a dispute/controversy, which could or are being attempted to be settled peacefully outside of, or without the assistance of such a corporate court.

XX. An official (officer of the court, policeman, etc., ) must before acting first be able to demonstrate that he/she is individually bonded in order to issue, use or implement any summary process they may rely upon.

XXI. An official who impairs, debauches, voids or abridges an obligation of trust or contract or the effect of a commercial lien without proper cause, by commercial dishonour, by default becomes a lien debtor and their property becomes forfeited as the pledge to secure the lien. Pound breach (breach of impoundment) and rescue is a crime of conversion and as such is a tort[2] and carries with it strict liabilities.

XXII. It is against The Law (including the royal law, the wisdom and lively Oracles of God as foresworn by every monarch since time immemorial) for a Judge to summarily remove, dismiss, dissolve or diminish any commercial lien.

XXIII. Only the Lien Claimant or a Jury can dissolve such a commercial lien.

XXIV. Any notice to the agent is notice to the principal; and accordingly notice to principal is notice to agent or their successor/s, assign/s or nominee/s.

XXV. PUBLIC LIABILITY INSURANCE BONDING OF CORPORATE OFFICERS/AGENTS: All officials are required by law to provide the name, address, and telephone number of their public liability/hazard and malpractice bonding company and the policy number of the bond and, if requested are required, to present, produce a certified copy of such policy, describing the bonding coverage as to their specific job performance. Failure to provide this information constitutes corporate and limited liability insurance fraud and is prima-facie evidence and grounds to impose the lien upon the official personally to secure their public oath and service of office.

With the Undersigned's sincerest appreciation in anticipation of your continued honourable services and assistance, moreover as time is of the essence, he entreats you govern yourself accordingly as your oaths of office dictate, now with sufficient judicial notice that the prevailing rules of equity shall apply and properly, without failure of consideration, be taken into deliberation thereof.

Tuesday, the sixteenth day of September anno Domini2008

red red

orange orange

yellow yellow

green green

blue blue

indigo indigo

violet violet

grey grey

black black

[1] summary judgment : A judgement granted on a claim of defence about which there is no genuine issue of material fact and upon which the movant I is entitled to prevail as a matter of law .... The court considers the contents of the pleadings, the motions, and additional evidence adduced by the parties, to determine whether there is a genuine issue of material fact rather than one of law. This procedural device allows for the speedy disposition of controversy without the need of a trial. Blacks Eighth Law Dictionary See also genuine issue, material fact.

summary judgment : A speedy procedure for obtaining judgment on a proceeding where the court is satisfied that a defendant has no defence to a claim. See the HC rules rr 135-144 and the DC rules rr 151-167. Summary judgment is not available against the crown or where an allegation of defamation, malicious prosecution, false imprisonment or fraud. "The general object of the rules about summary judgment … is to enable a plaintiff to obtain judgment where there is really no defence to the claim made and so put an end to this spectacle of a worthless defence being raised and pursed for the purpose of delay" {Per Somers J, Pemberton v Chappell [1987] 1NZLR1.2-3 DEFENCE}. As defined by Butterworth's NZ Law Dictionary 5th Edition Spiller.

summary : n. an abridgement; brief; compendium; digest; off-hand; without a jury; also a short application to a court or judge, without the formality of a full hearing. Black's 5th Ed P 1287

[2] tort • noun Law a wrongful act or an infringement of a right (other than under contract) leading to legal liability. — ORIGIN Latin tortum 'wrong, injustice' tortious /torshəss/ • adjective Law constituting a tort; wrongful. Concise Oxford Dictionary

Re: John Wilson Is In Jail - Reply From Ant to Pierre

21st September 2008

Good pickup & distinctions.

However it's 490 times...

Mat 18:21 Then came Peter to him, and said, Lord, how oft shall my brother sin against me, and I forgive him? till seven times?

Mat 18:22 Jesus saith unto him, I say not unto thee, Until seven times: but, Until seventy times seven.

Ant

Re: John Wilson Is In Jail - Reply From Wolter To Ant

21st September 2008

You remind me of attorneys of Temple Bar

When they purportedly study law at university, they do not study the Constitution or de jure authority.

They only study court precedents and court rules and regulations. Sadly neither make for law.

But this of course is done with intent. Lawyers who then become magistrates and judges, having no understanding of de jure authority, can only act within the realm of their understanding. This is precedents, which stand for the opinions of others, and court rules and regulation, which are created for the smooth running of the administration of the courts only. Neither have anything to do with law.

those of you, who can only quote passages from the Bible without researching what you read, have only blindly accepted what you have read without ever questioning the many contradictions found thereunder. Never questioned the behaviour of the church or why you ought to worship? Never questioned the actions and failures of your queen and government. You only complain, and will be complaining forever only more so as time goes by and the agenda progresses.

Discover to look beyond the square, your education has only been mind-conditioning. You have learnt nothing, but only been forced to accept what you been told and been given to read.

You have lost the power of reasoning through self-discovery.

In good faith I have presented you with some points to connect to through self-discovery. These points at least give you a starting point to commence your journey of discovery with.

However if you wish not to travel and discover for yourself, then do not complain of what is happening, or what is going to happen to you. you are part of it and make it happen.

It is interesting though that no one has contradicted my writings. If I was to be in error, surely some of you learned people would stand to correct me? Tell me what the Egyptian - Roman connection is all about. The signs are all around you, what do they mean or stand for? If you don't know and wish not to discover then what is your little forum all about?

Kind Regards
Wolter

Re: John Wilson Is In Jail - Reply From Gee Temp To Wolter Joost

21st September 2008

Christ's followers don't have to contradict your New Age B/S, Wolter, for it's all been written down for anyone's and everyone's education should they bother with it.

Dalliance with semantics is dancing with the devil and some of us have no time for it.

Please, all, do as the man has repeatedly asked and delete him from your mailing lists - the world is in crisis enough, but the wise know the future already.
Gee.

Re: John Wilson Is In Jail - Reply From Wolter J to Gee Temp

21st September 2008

Well, for starters I never claimed that you could not follow whoever you wish. I merely point out who you are [unwittingly] following.

But I also note that you could not refute the statements that I made or could answer any of the questions [or chose not to] and in contrast to your claims, I dealt with ancient facts.
Contradiction you will find a plenty in the Bible, especially the king James [new age] version

But by all means subject yourself to my request by deleting my name from your list and complain about your plight to your church and see if they care. Some years ago a wrote to the Archbishop
of Canterbury and reported that the diver judges and councillors of the queen violated her oath and covenant with God [which would see her abdicate government] and he thanked me and replied that he will remember me in his evening prayer.

Kind Regards
Wolter

Re: John Wilson Is In Jail - Reply From Ant To Wolter Joost

22nd September 2008

From Freerad

Ask yourself, or better ask your church why they do not stand up for their God?

Ha Ha, Yhwh doesn't need defending!!!!!!!

Little men like to think of Yhwh as a controllable god, someone unable to defend himself.

We are only commanded to stand up against the workers of iniquity. Not in defense of Yhwh, but in an effort to bring these evil men to repentance and redemption. Yhwh does the execution of judgement upon those who refuse His Ways.

Psalms 94:16 Who will rise up for me against the evildoers? or who will stand up for me against the workers of iniquity?

Ignorance of the prophecies and their fulfillment keeps the little boys ever searching but never coming to a knowledge of the truth.

It was the job of the prophets of Baal to lead the Isrealites away from their Creator. There are still plenty of them around today.

Leave them alone, they are held unto their idols.

Deuteronomy 29:29 The secret things belong unto the LORD our God: but those things which are revealed belong unto us and to our children for ever, that we may do all the words of this law.

Keep in mind that Wolter is only revealing the life of some guy named Jesus. I don't give a hoot about some kid named Jesus, or where he spent his holidays.

The Greeks love their mythical gods and tales about them. The Romans add to them, or present their own myths, and simply perpetuate them. They keep puppeteering "life" into some tale with man's hands to keep them going.-- Dead tales.

1 Corinthians 8:5 For though there be that are called gods, whether in heaven or in earth, (as there be gods many, and lords many).

Jesus is a false god, worshipped by the ignorant and those who choose to live a lie.

Our focus is upon Yehowshu, no-one has been able to dig up any crud about Him.

Grae

Re: John Wilson Is In Jail - Reply From Brian McDoug To Everyone

22nd September 2008

Thought?

What is the THE GREATEST THING IN THE WORLD.?

EVERY one has asked himself the great question of antiquity as of the modern world: What is the summum bonum—the supreme good? You have life before you. Once only you can live it. What is the noblest object of desire, the supreme gift to covet?

We have been accustomed to be told that the greatest thing in the religious world is Faith. That great word has been the key-note for centuries of the popular religion; and we have easily learned to look upon it as the greatest thing in the world. Well, we are wrong. If we have been told that, we may miss the mark. I have taken you, to Christianity at its source; and there we have seen, "The greatest of these is love." It is not an oversight. Paul was speaking of faith just a moment before. He says, "If I have all faith, so that I can remove mountains, and have not love, I am nothing. "So far from forgetting, he deliberately contrasts them, "Now abideth Faith, Hope, Love," and without a moment's hesitation, the decision falls, "The greatest of these is Love."

And it is not prejudice. A man is apt to recommend to others his own strong point. Love was not Paul's strong point. The observing student can detect a beautiful tenderness growing and ripening all through his character as Paul gets old; but the hand that wrote, "The greatest of these is love," when we meet it first, is stained with blood.

Nor is this letter to the Corinthians peculiar in singling out love as the summum bonum. The masterpieces of Christianity are agreed about it. Peter says, "Above all things have fervent love among yourselves." Above all things. And John goes farther, "God is love." And you remember the profound remark which Paul makes elsewhere, "Love is the fulfilling of the law." Did you ever think what he meant by that? In those days men were working their passage to Heaven by keeping the Ten Commandments, and the hundred and ten other commandments which they had manufactured out of them. Christ said, I will show you a more simple way. If you do one thing, you will do these hundred and ten things, without ever thinking about them. If you love, you will unconsciously fulfil the whole law. And can you readily see for yourselves how that must be so?.

Excerpt from another author.

Regards
Brian Mc Doug.

Re: John Wilson Is In Jail - Reply From Alex Young To Wolter J

21st September 2008

Wolter,
I have read and agreed with many of your posts. However as you are a man of learned knowledge, where is the grace in statements like “If you don't know and wish not to discover then what is your little forum all about?”.

I find your approach somewhat condescending. Does it really progress the cause to which we all aspire by having someone put themselves above other(s)? The greatest teacher is one who leads by example. The greatest leader is one who does not demand attention but commands respect.

It must also be remembered that many of us have lived very different lives to this point, which invariably accounts for different perspective on things. Just the fact that we are here reading this information as a common cause is the start of a miracle in itself. A good teacher does not judge, but seeks to educate and raise the level, dare I say bar, of education of their students across the broad as much as equally possible in the time they have.

Wolter, if knowledge is one thing, and if wisdom is the application of knowledge, i.e. when to act, when not to act etc, I and perhaps others would be delighted to hear of some instances or events that you have encountered with the Law/law that you can relate to us so that we may benefit from your experience and you us. After all what is the benefit of possessing knowledge if it is not applied or shared?

Kind Regards
Alex Young

Re: John Wilson Is In Jail - Reply From Rajendra To Alex Young

22nd September 2008

Alex you have my yeah on that.

Rajendra

Re: John Wilson Is In Jail - Reply From Wolter J To Alex Young

22nd September 2008

Dear Alex
I thank you for making this point. In hindsight I might have phrased it differently. However I thought, and maybe incorrectly, that this forum was to discover truth.

It is fair to suggest that those who wish not to discover, wish not to learn.

A good teacher is someone who does not give of his own knowledge but assists his students in the discovery of their own. It is good leaders that lead by example.

Please feel free to contact me any time personally, though I shall after this lot of replies no longer reply to this forum.

Kind Regards
Wolter

Re: John Wilson Is In Jail - Reply From Alex Young To Wolter J

22nd September 2008

Hi Wolter,
In case your thinking of leaving by having your email deleted *Alex gently grabs Wolter’s arm* Can we persuade you to stay on?

This forum is to discover truth. If not lets make it a forum for truth whereby we can respect each other differences, learn off each other without negative recourse and start doing things together. With such a wide selection of knowledge and experience in here, I propose a more permanent forum which is structured on topic/archives and action.

I offer the forum at http://www.playitforwardoz.com/forum/ for such use if members feel something like this is necessary. Other categories/topics can be created as necessary.

Regards
Alex Young

Re: John Wilson Is In Jail - Reply From Brian McDoug To Everyone

23rd September 2008

Dear All,
All the previous discussion comes to naught importance, because Globalization is here that is WW3/ the silent war has been won by the elite.

They are just tidying up the last process of world money control, all as referred to in Operations Research Technical Manual TM-SW7905.1.

In my opinion , "the world wide Global Warming emissions trading Scheme is that, 'a Scheme" based on the old Hegelian Principle , as per examples below.

They the world ideologists who have this plan for world Globalization and a massive reduced world population, are having trouble with the economic funding for these projects ,and public opinion and want more cash flow from the sheeple and to keep the ledger balancing..

Its impossible to run the world economics on the present methods and sytem it will eventually completly crash. The World Bank, IMF and the alphabet soup groups etc, are panicking and need all the Al Gores sheeple and the Enviroment (sky's falling down") sheeple, to plug the hole in the dam.

Hmmmm, interesting times!

Regards Brian Mc Doug.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------- Thesis --------------------- Antithesis ---------------------- Synthesis

Planned Change -- Create conflict ------------------ Create opposition to conflict; eg, fear, panic, hysteria. ------------------- Offer the solution to the problem created by step one. Change, which would have been impossible without the proper conditioning (steps one and two), is achieved.

Consensus, Conflict Resolution, Higher Order Thinking Skills, Delphi Technique ----------------- Enumerate the topic, issue, problem within established guidelines. (frame the debate) --------------- Dialogue, with everyone in the circle voicing their feelings and opinions within established guidelines and relative to the enumerated topic, issue, problem. ------------------------- Synthesize divergent views into one point of view representing the collective view of the group. Emphasize ownership. All must abide and support the collective view. (A soviet)

Whole child theory ----------------- Cognitive – what the child knows, knowledge ----------------- Affective – what the child feels, believes. -------------------- Psychomotor – how the child will act/behave, what the child can do.

Outcome-based education, Mastery Learning ----------------------- Identify wanted attitudes, values, beliefs. ---------------------- Create conflict between what the child knows and what the child believes (cognitive dissonance) ------------------------- Change existing belief system, effecting wa--nted behavior.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

God help us.
Regards Brian Mc Doug.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Support The Love For Life Campaign, Kindom & The Cristian Family

Supporting The Love For Life Website, The Cristian Family and The Living Dream Of Kindom (Creation Of Do No Harm Communities) - The Love for Life website is produced for free without a fee (no contract or conditions attached) as a gift of love for the benefit of others. If you feel you have gained something from visiting it, feel inspired, and would like to reciprocate as an equal exchange in substance and support (value), you are most welcome to make a gift of love to keep it and the dream of Kindom going. As always, we thank you for your gifts of love.

Additional Options

Bank:
Account name:
BSB:
Account number:
SWIFT BIC Code:
Australia New Zealand Banking Group (ANZ)
Fiona Caroline Cristian
012 547
5576 81376
ANZBAU3M

PAY PAL

Go To Your Pay Pal Account To Send Gifts To action @ loveforlife.com.au
Additional Options

 

The Cristian Family November 2006

We Stand For NO SYSTEM

Kindom (Do No Harm Communities) is the dream for freedom, but it is the dream for the freedom of those around us who also live the dream of freedom, because it is in living for the freedom of others that we get our freedom. When we live for the dreams of Kindom of those around us, we live life as a gift because we live for (dedicate our lives to) their dream of freedom, truth, peace, joy, abundance, etc, just as they live for our Kindom dreams too. This is true co-creation (cooperation) with no attack on the uniqueness of each of us. When we live this way, we have no need for any man-made system - everything/everyone has already been taken care of by our love for life.

Just as we do not have to jump 10 feet across the room to grab our next breath, neither do we have to worry about food, water and shelter because it has all been taken care of as we each co-create Kindoms/Kin-Domains for everyone. Now everybody and everything of the dream of life that is Kindom/Paradise is free (has been set free once again). The issue is greed and selfishness, power and control trips, arrogance, ignorance, being fed many many lies and being traumatised. The issue is not overpopulation - there is more than enough land available for every family to have a hectare (2.5 acres Kin-Domain) to care for. The land of Australia can provide a Kin-Domain for every family across Earth, each with a food forest, clean fresh drinking water and plenty of space for building natural do no harm habitats and with plenty of land left over.

Everyone must have the freedom to take full-responsibility for their lives, for the water they drink, the food they eat and for their shelter. Currently, "The System" forces everyone to give up taking full-responsibility so that we become grown up children accustomed to sucking on the nipples of "The System" corporations for everything, having to use money to get by and to follow the rules of money because we are not co-creating freedom, peace, truth, joy and abundance for each other. Money only leads to haves and have nots and all the abuse, manipulation and distractions that we are subjected to as slaves to money.

When we give up living for other's Kindom dreams, we start creating hell ("The System") all around us because we become self-centred - now it's all about "my freedom","my money", "my land", "my belief", "my saviour", "mine", "mine","mine", "i","i", "i", "own", "own", "own", etc. To protect what we claim we own requires a man-made system with FORCE to protect those self-centred claims. This is ALL trauma based and all story-telling (brainwashing/braindirtying).

NO SYSTEM = KINDOM/DO NO HARM COMMUNITIES
NO SYSTEM = KINDOM/DO NO HARM COMMUNITIES photo Kindom_zpsa6d24e8a.jpg

Our true freedom comes when we set our thoughts of freedom into motion so that we live freedom rather than just talking and thinking about it while we still slave for "The System". Kindom will not happen while we meditate for hours in the bush or do yoga retreats or wait for Jesus or follow the processes of the OPPT (One People's Public Trust now called One People). This is not freedom because we are not living freedom because we are living the story-telling of Jesus or Zeitgeist or The Secret or Thrive or One Earth/Consciousness/People.

Living Kindom is very, very hard work as we set about repairing the damage to MAN/Earth/Nature that we are ALL responsible for but the burden becomes lighter the more of us put our life-energy into the dream of returning Earth to Paradise. Day-after-day, we all have to work our arses off until Kindom is all around us (MAN) once again. This is the price we pay to set each other free on a piece of land (Kin-Domain), so that no one is under the image-power (education/brainwashing/story-telling) of another MAN anymore and so that everyone can have their space of love to create and live their unique, do no harm dreams. This only happens once we have the Kindoms set up so that everyone is provided for.

Once we re-create the food forests, whether on land or in the suburbs, we can re-claim our freedom, breaking the strangle-hold of "The System" because we are no longer reliant on its services and benefits and no longer turning each other into slaves of "The System", cogs in the wheels of "The System" machine. If we don't put the effort in to set everyone and everything free all around us then we still live in HELL ("The System"). The key is to live for everyone else's freedom so that we can have it too.

From Bare Dirt To Abundance
A Year In The Life Of The
Love For Life Food Forest

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
8th February 2013
51 Minutes 46 Seconds
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1sJCcCvZ97A

From Bare Dirt To Abundance Part Two A
5th November 2014
http://youtu.be/TPTPn8tgcPI
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8545

From Bare Dirt To Abundance Part Two B
Coming Shortly

We live for NO SYSTEM. We do not lose anything by not having a man-made system and, in fact, we gain. We gain our freedom and we gain abundance. Let go of the fear.

The Cristian Family November 2006

A Collection Of Various Love For Life Posts
Providing The Big Picture We See

Sequential Order

We ask you to NOT believe anything we say/share and instead use scrutiny like an intense blow torch and go where the logic of truth/sense takes you. This is very, very important. Put everything you believe up to the test of scrutiny to see how it stacks up. If you are true to your heart/senses and go where the logic of truth/sense takes you will find that NO belief, etc, will stand up to the test of scrutiny. They just do not stack up because they are lies/fraud.

After you have watched and read all the material and any questions are left unanswered, send us your landline number and we will use the internet phone as a free unlimited call. We are on Sydney NSW Australia time. Best times for us to chat are between 11.00am and 6.00pm.

It is critical that you fully comprehend Image Power, "Spelling", Trauma, Reaction To Trauma, Curses, Processing Curses, Full-Responsibility/Liability, Limited Liability/Responsibility (passing-the-back), Slavery, Senses/Sense vs Non-Sense/Senses, Re-Presenting Intellectual Property such as but not limited to "Name", Storytelling/Storytellers, Duality, Black-Magic, Belief, Lies, "i", All Seeing "i" (eye), etc..... These themes and others are covered over and over and over again.

If you do not comprehend these insights and are unable to use your senses to sense your way through all the non-sense/non-sensory-images that enslave MAN under their image power (darkness = "The System" = Hell), men and women will remain deeply trapped under a terrible state of trauma. Our intention is to inspire you to remedy by showing you how to move away from reacting to trauma in all its nefarious and devious forms.

IMAGE POWER
Superb Diamond Range Interviewing
Arthur & Fiona Cristian 4th February 2014
http://youtu.be/qFnuuw3kLog
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8501

His-Story/Her-Story (History)
Arthur Cristian - Love For Life
2005-2007 - Re-posted July 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8529

The Dream Of Life Part 6
Under The Spell Of Intellectual Property

Arthur Cristian - 51 Minutes 52 Seconds
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IMK7CkU1ih8

Trauma Induced Fantasy
July 2013 Interview With
Jeanice Barcelo And Arthur & Fiona Cristian
http://youtu.be/CZVj-ddUoZw
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8500

The Dark Side Of The Moon
The Background To "The System"

Arthur & Fiona Cristian Interviewed By
Jahnick Leaunier, The Tru-Mon Show
24th August 2016
Love For Life - 142 Minutes
https://youtu.be/C5TViw1NLr4

Eric Dubay's Flat Earth Is A Cult
The Background To The System Part Two

Arthur & Fiona Cristian Chatting With
Jahnick Leaunier On The Tru-Mon Show
Love For Life - 31st August 2016
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8585
154 Minutes
https://youtu.be/rCPWgEQg-2M

Eclipse Of The Sun - Video (Arthur swears in this video)
The Background To The System Part Three
Arthur & Fiona Cristian Chatting With
Jahnick Leaunier On The Tru-Mon Show
Love For Life - 25th October 2016
https://youtu.be/FMOsOi1kNRc

The "Name" Is The Mark Of The Beast
The Strawman Identifying
Your Slave Status In "The System"

By Arthur Cristian - Love For Life
5th February 2012 - 56 Minutes 25 Seconds
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DdOag66v7uo

The Satanic Craft Of Inculcation In Practice
Fiona's ACT Supreme Court Affidavit Explaining Inculcation & Illumination
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
4th March 2016
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8578

The Spinning Top
Full Bloom Inculcation

Arthur And Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
Facebook Discussions Between The
8th December 2016
And
26th January 2017
Link: http://loveforlife.com.au/content/16/03/04/satanic-craft-inculcation-pra...

The Shit Of Death
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
28th January 2017
Link: http://loveforlife.com.au/content/16/03/04/satanic-craft-inculcation-pra...

The Selfie Of Freakenstein
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
17th March 2017
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8588

Three Sets Of Fiona Cristian Documents Filed With ACAT
Merged Into One Document For Downloading
https://www.scribd.com/document/327370355/Fiona-Cristian-Affidavit-ACT-S...

Fiona Cristian Affidavit
ACT Supreme Court / Court Of Appeal

https://www.scribd.com/doc/316218306/Three-Sets-of-Fiona-Cristian-Docume...

Dancing With Magic (Lies)
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Videos, Articles, Comments
And Pending E-Book
Love Fort Life
September 2015
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8575

Dancing With Magic Part One
Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life
5th September 2015
https://youtu.be/hx7qJ7r2OS4

Dancing With Magic Part Two
Arthur Cristian - Love For Life
12th September 2015
https://youtu.be/b_KuEFdKmnA

Dancing With Magic Part Three
Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life
13th September 2015
https://youtu.be/9pJc1NfnAcI

Dancing With Magic (Lies) Part Four:
Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life
16th September 2015
https://youtu.be/kSVURGwm1Go

Introduction To Kindom Video
By Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life
6th March 2015
https://youtu.be/7SspPm9wRgo

To Be Educated Is To Have No Soul
The System Is Soul Destroying

Frederick Malouf & Michael Tellinger's
Contrived Gifting
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
1st September 2016
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8586

Illumination IS Definition
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
26th to 29th January 2016
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8577

IMAGE POWER
The Nefarious Tactics Used
To Disguise Truth And Distract Us
From Remedy

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
24th January 2014
This post contains many recent Facebook comments
and email replies which collectively provides a big picture
into exposing the deception behind IMAGE POWER.
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8496

The Pull Of E-Motion
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
8th February 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8499

Processing Curses
A Lie Is A Curse
Liars Process Curses

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
26th February 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8503

How The System Is Really Constructed
Bouncing Back Curses Upon Curse Makers
To Stop Harm Forevermore

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
27th February 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8504

Slave To A Name
Parts One, Two, Three, Four,
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
3rd to 6th March 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8505

Educated Slaves
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
20th March 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8506

The Only Path To Freedom
Beware The False Steps

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 2nd April 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8508

Free-Dumb For All
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 5th April 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8510

Revoking The Ego
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 8th April 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8511

How MAN Commits Spiritual Suicide
Arthur Cristian
Love For Life - 3rd April 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8509

How To Detect Intel Operatives Working
For The New World Order Agenda
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 10th April 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8512

How The Psyop Program & Intel Networks
Are Messing With Your Head +
His-Story/Her-Story

Arthur & Fiona Cristian - April 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8513

Godzilla Through The Looking Glass
Destroyed By Name"

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 20th April 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8514

What It's Going To Take
To Co-Create Freedom Forevermore

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 22nd April 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8514

Falling For Fairy Stories
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 24th April 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8514

A Disassociation From The Work
Of Kate of Gaia

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 17th May 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8517

Separating The Wheat From The Chaff
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 22nd May 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8516

Revolution Or Revolution
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 25th May 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8520

Routing Out Psyop Programs
Routs Out Intel Operatives
Exposing Max Igan's Psyop Program

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 31st May 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8524

The Psyop Program Scam
Behind Religion Belief Faith
& Associated Opinion

Arthur Cristian
Love For Life
11th June 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8525

Another Delusion
Arthur Cristian
Love For Life
11th June 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8526

A World Of Words Is A World Of Lies
Arthur Cristian
Love For Life
13th June 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8527

E-MAN
The Name Of The Beast Is MAN

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 9th May 2014
Includes Mountain MAN Arrested
Facebook Discussion About "Name"
Uploaded 25th June 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8528

E-Motion
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 13th August 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8537

Discussion With Brother Gregory
Clearly Demonstrating Christianity
Is Part Of The Problem
And Not The Solution

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
Between the 12th May 2014 and 30th August 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8542

The Psyop Program Behind Free Food
And Permaculture

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
29th October 2014
Facebook Discussion With Unconditional Love Moon
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8544

Head So Strong
Music and Vocals Arthur Cristian
Backing Vocals and Vocal Effects Arthur Cristian & Hannah Wood
Lyrics Fiona and Arthur Cristian
Written during our spare time between Aug & Oct 2014
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OG4UQCTsqwU

The Time Of Trauma That Destroys Us
Arthur Cristian - Love For Life
9th November 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8547

The Most Powerful Video On Spirituality
And Happiness FOR SLAVES
Or
How To Accept Slavery And Be Happy About It

Arthur Cristian - Love For Life
6th August 2014
Facebook Discussion About The Work Of Eckhart Tolle
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8548

What Can We Do What Can We See
Arthur Cristian - Love For Life
A series of Arthur Cristian Facebook
posts and discussions
between 17th and 21st November 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8552

The Misuse Of Love By Intel Networks
To Create Doubt And Uncertainty
With The Intention To Destroy Love
And Therefore Destroy MAN
(True Freedom, Peace, Joy, Abundance And Truth
For Everyone)

By Arthur Cristian - Love For Life
26th November 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8554

The Void Of E-GO That Is Spiritual Suicide
The Justification Of Laziness
That Perpetuates System Creature Comforts
Ensuring Our Fall

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
13th December 2014
Massive Update Occurred 14th Dec 2014 3.10pm Sydney Aust time
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8556

Darkness Visible Part One A, B, C, D
The Freemasonic World In Plain Sight
Decoding George Washington Lithographs

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
14th December 2014
Part One A http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8557
Part One B http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8567
Part One C http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8568
Part One D http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8569

Darkness Visible Part Two
Yin And Yang, Duality, Spiritual Suicide
And Frank O'Collins UCADIA / One Heaven

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
14th December 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8558

Darkness Visible Part Three
How The Word Sausage
Re-Presents The New World Order
Boiling Point & Out To Get Us

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
27th December 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8560

Darkness Visible Part Four
Aleister Crowley - Thelema - OTO
And The Black Magic Psychedelia Of The Intellect

Facebook Discussion
4th to 10th January 2015
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8561

Darkness Visible Part Five
Living MAN Fiona Cristian's Standing
+ Decoding Judeo/Judaism

Fiona Cristian & Arthur Cristian
Love For Life
24th January 2015
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8562

Darkness Visible Part Six
The Many Fingers Of The Hidden Hand Appearing
YouTube Community Flagged A Video
Posted To The ArthurLoveForLife YouTube Channel
As Being "Hate Speech"

Fiona Cristian & Arthur Cristian
Love For Life
4th February 2015
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8563

Darkness Visible Part Seven
The Full Responsibility For Setting
True Freedom For All Into Motion
In Present-Sense Forevermore

Fiona Cristian & Arthur Cristian
Love For Life
10th February 2015
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8564

Who We Really Are Does Not End
At The Surface Of Our Skin

Arthur Cristian & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 22nd February 2015
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8565

Introduction To Kindom Video
By Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life
6th March 2015
https://youtu.be/7SspPm9wRgo

The Rot Parts One, Two, Three
Arthur Cristian
Love For Life
5th June 2015
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8571

"The Good Guys" And The "Bad Guys"
Working Together To Bring In
The New World Order

Arthur Cristian - 18th July 2015
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8572

Can You Spot The Ego?
Where's Wally? Part One

Compilation of Facebook & Youtube
Insight Posts During Aug/Sept 2015
By Arthur Cristian
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8573

Can You Spot The Ego?
Where's Wally? Part Two

Compilation of Facebook & Youtube
Insight Posts During Aug/Sept 2015
By Arthur Cristian
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8576

Dancing With Magic (Lies)
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Videos, Articles, Comments
And Pending E-Book
Love Fort Life
September 2015
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8575

Dancing With Magic Part One
Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life
5th September 2015
https://youtu.be/hx7qJ7r2OS4

Dancing With Magic Part Two
Arthur Cristian - Love For Life
12th September 2015
https://youtu.be/b_KuEFdKmnA

Dancing With Magic Part Three
Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life
13th September 2015
https://youtu.be/9pJc1NfnAcI

Dancing With Magic (Lies) Part Four:
Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life
16th September 2015
https://youtu.be/kSVURGwm1Go

Illumination IS Definition
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
26th to 29th January 2016
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8577

The Satanic Craft Of Inculcation In Practice
Fiona's ACT Supreme Court Affidavit Explaining Inculcation & Illumination
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
4th March 2016
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8578

The Dark Side Of The Moon
The Background To "The System" Part One

Arthur & Fiona Cristian Chatting With
Jahnick Leaunier On The Tru-Mon Show
Love For Life - 24th August 2016
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8583

Eric Dubay's Flat Earth Is A Cult
The Background To The System Part Two

Arthur & Fiona Cristian Chatting With
Jahnick Leaunier On The Tru-Mon Show
Love For Life - 31st August 2016
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8585

To Be Educated Is To Have No Soul
The System Is Soul Destroying
Frederick Malouf & Michael Tellinger's
Contrived Gifting

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
1st September 2016
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8586

New Love For Life Kindom Facebook Group
Started March 2015
https://www.facebook.com/groups/1434747556816918
Includes 63 Minute
Introduction To Kindom Video
https://youtu.be/7SspPm9wRgo
By Arthur & Fiona Cristian
and
Facebook Kindom Group Guidelines
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8566
The Love For Life website home-page provides
the bigger-picture background to the themes
touched on in this video: http://loveforlife.com.au

Crop Circles Are A Massive Hoax
Facebook Discussion On Simon Kawai's Wall
Involving Arthur & Fiona Cristian
31st August 2013
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8470

OPPT & Slavery Through Intellectual Conscription By Deceit
Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life
27th February 2013 onwards...
Part One: http://youtu.be/Qjp_9nlrBao
Part Two: http://youtu.be/tbybeOWZ-Bc
Part Three: http://youtu.be/yOWoxH-HbVw

Water Is The Life Of MANS Consciousness (Breath)
Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life - 8th February 2013
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8350
Part One: http://youtu.be/4ze66_33wxM - 70 Minutes 5 Seconds
Part Two: http://youtu.be/43gIi-sjxJc - 81 Minutes 13 Seconds
Part Three: http://youtu.be/oooY6W63K-M - 70 Minutes 18 Seconds

What Do You Believe On Origins?
Who Said There Was A Beginning?
Who's Truth Do You Accept?
Belief Is A Strange Idea.

Discussion Lyndell, Scott and Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Between March and April 2013
Posted 29th October 2013
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8487

So You Want The Good Bits Of "The System"
But Not The Bad Bits?

By Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 12th August 2013
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8468

Turning Away From The Reflection
Of MANS Looking Glass

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
30th April 2013
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8404

REMEDY

From Bare Dirt To Abundance
A Year In The Life Of The
Love For Life Food Forest

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
8th February 2013
51 Minutes 46 Seconds
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1sJCcCvZ97A

From Bare Dirt To Abundance Part Two
5th November 2014
http://youtu.be/TPTPn8tgcPI
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8545

From Bare Dirt To Abundance Part Three
7th March 2016
60 Minutes
https://youtu.be/SH9i8ZStzWI

Love For Life Food Forest & Native Garden March 2016
Extension Of The Love For Life Food Forest And Establishment
Of A New Native Garden At The Front Of The Rental Property
In East Bowral - 24th October 2015 to Mid February 2016.
15 Minutes
https://youtu.be/y-Uz8HmnSIM

Control The Land
And You Control MAN On The Land
Displace MAN From Land
And You Turn MAN Into Slaves

Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life
April 2011 (Updated 14th September 2011)
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8237

The Divine Spark
Facebook Discussion With Raymond Karczewski
Arthur & Fiona Cristian & Others
2nd October 2013
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8483

Capturing Another MANS Uniqueness
A Facebook Debate With
Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life
And Raymond Karczewski
Starting 13th May 2013
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8414

The Spell Is Broken
Taking The Land To Create Kindom

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
3rd March 2013
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8365

The Steps Of Kindom
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life 2006/2007
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8304

To explore these themes in greater detail go here where you can find links to all our Love For Life comments, articles, debates, discussions, videos, podcasts, etc: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/3385

All the best
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life

Website: http://loveforlife.com.au
Email : action@loveforlife.com.au
Mobile : 0011 61 418 203204 - (0418 203204)
Snail Mail: PO Box 1320 Bowral 2576 NSW Australia
Facebook Arthur Cristian : http://www.facebook.com/arthurcristian
YouTube Arthur Cristian : http://www.youtube.com/ArthurLoveForLife

Register To The Love For Life Mailing List: http://loveforlife.com.au/content/09/05/14/mailing-list

Facebook Group Why Aren't We Free Discussion : http://www.facebook.com/164918753537287
Facebook Group Kindom/Do No Harm Community Discussion : http://www.facebook.com/151811728195925

Links below will kick in when the professionally recorded Love For Life music is released.

SoundCloud : http://soundcloud.com/loveforlife
Nimbit Music : http://www.nimbitmusic.com/loveforlife
Twitter : https://twitter.com/loveforlifemusi
Facebook Music : http://www.facebook.com/loveforlifemusic
YouTube Love For Life Music : http://www.myspace.com/loveforlifemusic
MySpace : http://www.myspace.com/loveforlifemusic
Google + Fiona Cristian : https://plus.google.com/100490175160871610090

Peaceful Transition Through Sacrifice And Service

We feel there is an essential peaceful do no harm transition required to get all of MAN back to standing on MANS feet without reliance upon another MAN for water, food, shelter. As it stands everyone in "The System" are highly dependent and reliant on the "group mind-set" that forms "The System" of slaves providing services and benefits for the emotionally addicted slaves to "The System" (and you can put us in the same basket too). The transition is to get MAN back to relying ONLY on nature without 3rd party interlopers, intermeddlers, interceders getting in the way. The transition is a team effort with the foresight for setting all of MAN free down-the-line so that MAN is no longer dependent on slaves and masters providing services, benefits, privileges and exclusivity while being bound to contracts, rituals, procedures, conditions, rules & regulations which compromises MAN severely.

This transition is all about shifting from limited liability/responsibility to full liability/responsibility. This full responsibility is all about caring for our health, nature all around us, clean uncorrupted (pure) water and food, partner/co-creator, children, shelter, animal-friends in partnership, etc. In "The System", we are already together destroying each other - we have to come together to create peace together so that we can all have peace. We cannot live peacefully when we are islands, not taking full responsibility for the lives of those around us until EVERYONE can take full responsibility for their life, which means that EVERYONE is healed of system trauma. In "The System", we all come together to make slaves of each other - now is the moment to come together to set each other free, to live for each other's freedom, peace, joy and abundance. Once we have set each other free, we are free.

Control The Land
And You Control MAN On The Land
Displace MAN From Land
And You Turn MAN Into Slaves

Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life
April 2011 (Updated 14th September 2011)
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8237

The Spell Is Broken
Taking The Land To Create Kindom

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
3rd March 2013
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8365

"The Steps Of Kindom"
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8304

---------

Once we fix these issues, we or our children or our descendants to come, can start focusing on the even bigger picture of getting back to where our ancestors were, as breatharyan's, before they fell into non-sense images to be enslaved by them.

All the best to you and your family
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life

The Cristian Family November 2006

The Cristian Family Declaration

The Cristian family and The Love for Life Campaign are apolitical, non-religious, non-violent, anti weapons, anti drugs (both pharmaceutical and recreational) and anti any ideology that denies the existence of Do No Harm Communities (Kindoms) and suppresses the uniqueness and freedom of all men, women and children.

The Cristian family and our Love For Life work is unaligned to any big business corporation, intelligence agency, government body, "system" law, "system" think tanks, "system" green or environmental movements, religion, cult, sect, society (fraternity, brotherhood, sisterhood, order, club, etc,) secret or not, hidden agenda, law or sovereignty group, occult, esoteric, New Age or Old Age.

The Cristian family supports and promotes the remedy that brings an everlasting peace, freedom, truth, joy, abundance and do no harm for all of life without causing loss of uniqueness or the need for having slaves and rulers. We are not into following the one in front or being shepherds for sheeple. Most importantly, we take full-responsibility for everything we think, feel and do.

The Cristian family are not Christians.

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life

December 2006

The Cristian Family November 2006

THE CRISTIAN FAMILY PLEDGE

Being of clear brain, heart and intention, we each declare the following to be true:

• We have no intention of ending our own lives.

• We will not tolerate suppression of truth, ideas, freedom, or our work. We stand for freedom of speech.

• We stand together to support others in the expression of truths and freedom to speak out no matter how radical those ideas may seem.

• Standing for freedom takes courage; together we shall be strong in the face of all odds.

• If it is ever claimed that we have committed suicide, encountered an unfortunate accident, died of sickness/disease, disappeared, been institutionalized, or sold out financially or in any other way to self-interested factions, we declare those claims false and fabricated.

• We testify, assert and affirm without reservation, on behalf of all those who have dedicated their lives to the ending of secrecy and the promotion of freedom of thought, ideas and expression that we shall prevail.

• We Do Not Have Multiple Personality Disorders

Arthur Cristian
Fiona Cristian
Jasmin Lily Cristian
Emma Rose Cristian
Frances Hannah Cristian
Xanthe Jane Cristian

15th December 2006 (Edited/Updated 18th September 2011)

The Cristian Family November 2006

Update Regarding The Love For Life
Home Page And Quick User Guide

We are turning the Love for Life Quick User Guide http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6608 into a blog of all the main insights of our work since March 2005, whether through articles, videos, podcasts or discussions/debates.

As we do not have the time to compile everything we have written into a book, as many have suggested we do, compiling all our most important work into one area of the website is a way of providing easy access to this work so those interested are able to fully comprehend the big picture.

Instead of having to find our different articles, videos, etc, in various parts of the website, it will all be accessible here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6608 and here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/3385.

Love For Life Videos

As amateurs and posted in the Quick User Guide below the Facebook links, we're currently creating and posting a series of videos called "The Dream Of Life" which covers the ground of all the Love For Life insights. We plan to have the videos completed by December 31st 2012. Once this is behind us, our intention is to create a 2 hour or so video covering the body of this work. All videos are embedded in the quick user guide http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6608 and uploaded in Arthur's YouTube channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/ArthurLoveForLife.

Love For Life Music

We have started recording songs, with others, that express the themes of Love For Life. They are now being posted on Arthur's YouTube channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/ArthurLoveForLife and are embedded in the quick user guide http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6608. We have over 100 songs to record. A few rough demos have already been used as the soundtrack on the first "Dream of Life" video.

About Us - Love For Life & The Cristian Family

Also, everything we, the Cristian family, have gone through, from bank fraud and the theft of the family home to death threats and attempts on Arthur's life, is documented in the Quick User Guide too. If you, the reader, are prepared to put the effort in, you will comprehend the extent to which we have all been tricked into becoming slaves, giving up our uniqueness and our full-responsibility for life and destroying everything of life to the point where life is in danger of dying out completely. You will also comprehend the remedy to all this chaos; a remedy that requires only love for life and the determination to do what needs to be done. Though our focus is very strongly on the remedy that creates a world of freedom, truth, peace, joy, abundance and Do No Harm for all of life without loss of uniqueness or the need for slaves and rulers, we realise that it is vital to comprehend how to get there and what stops us from getting there. This is why there is so much information on the hows and whys of everything going wrong in the world today. We are not into peddling conspiracy theories, we are into routing out all forms of organised crime.

Saturday 26th November 2011

Arthur and Fiona Cristian
Love For Life

Website: http://loveforlife.com.au
Email: action@loveforlife.com.au
Mobile: 0011 61 418 203204 - (0418 203204)
Facebook Arthur Cristian: http://www.facebook.com/arthurcristian
YouTube Arthur Cristian: http://www.youtube.com/ArthurLoveForLife
SoundCloud: http://soundcloud.com/loveforlife
Nimbit Music: http://www.nimbitmusic.com/loveforlife
Twitter: https://twitter.com/loveforlifemusi
Facebook Music: http://www.facebook.com/loveforlifemusic
Facebook Why Aren't We Free Discussion: http://www.facebook.com/164918753537287
Facebook Do No Harm Community: http://www.facebook.com/151811728195925
YouTube Love For Life Music: http://www.myspace.com/loveforlifemusic
MySpace: http://www.myspace.com/loveforlifemusic
Google + Fiona Cristian: https://plus.google.com/100490175160871610090
Register To The Love For Life Mailing List: http://loveforlife.com.au/content/09/05/14/mailing-list

1. For The Body Of The Love For Life Work by Arthur and Fiona Cristian

Which Unravels The Reasons For The Chaos, Mayhem and Confusion Being Experienced In The World Today, Explains The Need For "Community Immunity" and Responsibility, and Focuses On The Creation Of Kindoms - Do No Harm, Life-Sustainable Communities (As The Remedy That Heals All Mans Woes) - And How We Can Co-Create Them. For Comments, Articles And Discussions, Go Here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/3385 - Also Go Here To See Podcasts And Videos Posted by Arthur & Fiona Cristian: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/7309 - The Information Shared Comes From Inspiration, Intuition, Heartfelt-Logic And Information Gathered From Nature And Many Amazing Men And Women Along The Way. It Is Not Found In Any Books Or Channellings, Or Talked About By "Experts". Go Here To Read A Brief Synopsis Of Why We Started Love For Life: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8182

2. For Information About The Ringing Cedars of Russia Series

go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/1125 and for more on Eco Homes, Villages, Organic and Permaculture Gardening and Life-Sustainability, etc, go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/3641 and here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/1985 and Mikhail Petrovich Shchetinin - Kin's School - Lycee School at Tekos: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/5173

3. For How To Eat A Raw, Living Food Diet,

go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/5068 - LIFE is information. When we distort LIFE and then eat, drink, absorb, think, feel, hear, see, touch, taste, smell and perform these distortions, the information of LIFE, your LIFE, our LIFE, our children's lives, everyone's LIFE, is distorted.

4. To Find A Menu For The Extensive Research Library (over 8,000 items posted embodying over 11,000 documents, pdf's, videos, podcasts, etc)

Which Covers Topics From Health to Chemtrails/Haarp to Brain Control to Archaeology to Astronomy Geocentricity Heliocentricity to Pandemics Bird Flu Swine Flu to Fluoride to Cancer to Free Energy to Global Warming, 9/11, Bali Bombings, Aspartame, MSG, Vaccinations, Aids/HIV, Mercury, New World Order, Satanism, Religions, Cults, Sects, Symbolism, etc, etc, go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/82

5. If You Would Like To Read About The Cristian Family NSW Supreme Court Case

(Macquarie Bank/Perpetual Limited Bank Fraud Condoned By Judges, Registrars, Barristers, Lawyers, Politicians, Public Servants, Bureaucrats, Big Business and Media Representatives - A Crime Syndicate/Terrorist Organisation) Which Prompted The Creation Of This Love For Life Website December 2006, And The Shooting And Torture Of Supporters Who Assisted Us In Reclaiming The Family Home, Joe Bryant And His Wife, Both In Their Late 70's, go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/5 And Read Some Of Our Email Correspondence With Lawyer Paul Kean - Macedone Christie Willis Solari Partners - Miranda Sydney May 17th-June 27th 2006: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/7300

6. For The Stories Of Other Victims Of The System,

go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/australian_stories (If you have a story you would like us to put up, we would love to here from you:
action @ loveforlife.com.au)

7. For Documentation Of Harm Done By The Powers-That-Be And Their Representatives,

Evidence Revealing How Victims Did Not Break The Peace, Caused No Crime or Harm, There Were No Injured Parties. Documenting Incontrovertible Evidence Demonstrating How The Powers That Be (PTB) And Their Lackeys Will Break All The Laws They Are Supposed To Uphold. They Will Kidnap, Intimidate, Terrorise, Rape, Pillage, Plunder And Lie And Take Responsibility For None Of It. All Part Of Their Tactics Of Using Fear And Trauma To Keep Us In Our Place. Relatives Of Those Under Their Radar Are Also Not Safe From Attack And Intimidation. All Starting From A $25 Fine For Not Voting And A $65 Fine For Not Changing A Dog Registration. We Do Not Have Freedom And Can Only Appear To Have Freedom If We Comply. Regardless How Small The Matter The PTB Throw Hundreds Of Thousands Of Dollars Away To Enforce Their Will.... Go Here:
Fiona Cristian Reply To State Debt Recovery Office - Part One to Part Ten - From 17th October 2008 And Still Continuing:
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6319 or
Fiona Cristian Reply To State Debt Recovery Office
Part One: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/5742 - From 17th October 2008
Part Two: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6135 - From 18th December 2008
Part Three: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6295 - From 9th January 2009
Part Four: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6296 - From 14th January 2009
Part Five: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6375 - The Sick Puppy - From 20th February 2009
Part Six: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6390 - Police Officers, Sheriff’s Officers, Tow Truck Driver and State Debt Recovery Office Blatantly Ignore the Law To Rape, Pillage and Plunder The Private Property Of Fiona Cristian - From 11th March 2009
Part Seven: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6445 - Affidavit Of Truth - Letter To The Queen + Australia: Fascism is Corporatism - From 30th March 2009
Part Eight: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6652 - The Pirates Auction And The Ghost Of VSL386 - From 4th April 2009
Part Nine: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/7073 - Arthur Cristian's Letter To Pru Goward MP - From 15th December 2009
Part Ten: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/7500 - Should We Be In Fear Of Those Who Claim To Protect Us? "Roman Cult" Canon Law - Ecclesiastical Deed Poll - The Work Of Frank O'Collins - From 13th October 2010

8. If You Are Interested In Information On Freedom From Statutes, Rule-Of-Law, Free Man/Free Woman, Strawman, "Person" and Admiralty Law (The Law Of Commerce),

go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/895 - For Common Law, Democracy, Constitution, Trial By Jury, Fee Simple, etc, go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/category/main/law-articles-documents

9. If You Are Interested In Banking and Money Created (Fiat/Credit/Debt/Mortgage/Loan/Overdraft etc) Out-Of-Thin-Air, How Banks Counterfeit Money,

go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/banks

10. For A List Of All The Latest Posts In The Love For Life Website,

go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/tracker

11. For Links To Many Hundreds Of Videos, DVDs And Podcasts

go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/video_dvd

12. To See The Cristian Family Pledge, Legal and other Disclaimers

go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/content/06/12/05/love-life-legal-disclaimer

13. To Read About How A Representative Of The NSW Jewish Board Of Deputies Had Threatened To Shut Down The Love For Life Website

go here: Part One: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6616 Part Two: THE STEVE JOHNSON REPORT AND VIDEO: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6665 and Part Three: Latest Update On James Von Brunn: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6673

Conscious Love Always
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
action @ loveforlife.com.au
www.loveforlife.com.au
0418 203204 (int: 0011 61 418 203204)
PO Box 1320 Bowral 2576 NSW Australia

Arthur Cristian

Create Your Badge

Love For Life Discussions - Why Aren't We Free? How Can We Be Free?

Promote your Page too

The Cristian Family November 2006

Love For Life Legal Disclaimer

The information contained on this world wide web site (the web site and all information herein shall be collectively referred to as "Web Site Information"), under the registered url name, loveforlife.com.au, resides on a host server environment in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15203, United States of America.

The Web Site Information has been prepared to provide general information only and is not intended to constitute or be construed as providing substantive professional advice or opinion on any facts or circumstances. Transmission of the information is not intended to create, nor does its receipt give rise to, a professional-client relationship between 'Love for Life' and the receiver.

While every care has been taken to ensure the accuracy and timeliness of the information prepared and/or reported on this site, 'Love for Life' is not responsible for any errors or omissions or for the Web Site Information not being up to date. The Web Site Information may not reflect the most current developments.

The impact of the law, policy and/or procedure for any particular situation depends on a variety of factors; therefore, readers should not act upon any Web Site Information without seeking professional advice. 'Love for Life' is not responsible for any action taken in reliance on any Web Site Information herein.

'Love for Life' is not responsible for any action you or others take which relies on information in this website and/or responses thereto. 'Love for Life' disclaim all responsibility and liability for loss or damage suffered by any person relying, directly or indirectly, on the Web Site Information, including in relation to negligence or any other default.

'Love for Life' does not warrant, represent or hold out that any Web Site Information will not cause damage, or is free from any computer virus, defect(s) or error(s). 'Love for Life' is not liable to users for any loss or damage however caused resulting from the use of material found on its web site.

'Love for Life' does not necessarily endorse or approve of any Web Site Information linked to and contained on other web sites linked herein and makes no warranties or representations regarding the merchantability or fitness for purpose, accuracy and quality, of any such information.

The sending of information by you, and the receipt of it by 'Love for Life', is not intended to, and does not, create a professional-client relationship.

All Web Site Information is considered correct at the time of the web site's most recent revision.

ADDITIONAL DISCLAIMER

THE CRISTIAN FAMILY SUPPORTS
FREEDOM OF SPEECH - FREEDOM OF THOUGHT

The Cristian Family November 2006

Posted Wednesday 17th June 2009
Updated September 2011

NSW Jewish Board Of Deputies
Has Threatened To Shut Down
The Love For Life Website

No Freedom Of Speech - No Freedom Of Thought

Love For Life does not support harm doing in any shape or form. However, we are supporters of free speech and post articles, documentaries, etc, that represent a wide cross section of ideas. See the Love For Life extensive research library where over 6000 documents, articles and videos are posted: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/82. We clearly see the evidence of the destruction to MAN and the earth that has been caused by ALL religions over the centuries and are therefore not supporters of religions, cults, sects or any group that demands conformity of thought, speech or action, or has rules, regulations or rituals that must be followed. Religions, nationalities and cultural "identities" are formed as a result of the brainwashing we receive from childhood. They are part of the tactics the Establishment uses to keep us all divided from one another and fighting one another.

All religions promote discrimination and division, leading to hatred and even violence and murder. None of them have yet to produce a remedy to all the suffering, poverty, unhappiness and discrimination in the world. If any religion truly had the remedy to all the suffering on earth, there would no longer be any suffering. What have Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, Judaism, atheism and the New Age done to end the suffering in the world?

Since December 2006, there have been many attempts to take down the Love For Life website. Any attempts have been thwarted by Love For Life supporters inundating the harm-doers with emails, etc, objecting to them taking down the website for a variety of reasons. The trouble makers usually back off when they realise that they can post all their views, arguments, beliefs, etc, in the Love For Life website without censorship or restriction imposed. They get to see that even the Queen, Pope, Prime Minister, President of America, etc, can post all their views without hindrance or sabotage and that we support freedom of speech/thought which means we support the right of all sides to express their views.

Of note, there is a vast amount of information posted in the Love For Life website which we do not agree with but we leave it all up because we refuse to be biased, opinionated or self-centered/self-serving. Of the many thousands of comments posted over the years we have only removed posts containing secret links to commercial advertisements, terrible foul language, threats of violence and death, etc, and attacks on other people's characters that avoid the subject/debate at hand. Besides links to advertisements, we have taken down less than six comments due to the above. We usually leave everything up, all warts and all, even those posts threatening to do terrible things to Fiona, our children, our dogs, our friends, family & supporters, etc.

The Love For Life website has information from all sides on many subjects, whether about Islam, Judaism, Christianity, Law, health, psychology, mind control, vaccination, aspartame, MSG, Chemtrails etc. There are over 11,000 articles, documentaries etc on the website and they are so diverse that we are sure that everyone would be able to find something they loved and something they hated, if they took the time to search. If we removed all the articles hated by everyone, there would probably be nothing left! We are not anti anyone but freedom of speech is freedom of speech and no one should condemn the work of another without taking the time to research the subject themselves. Yes, there are articles by those who have a less-than-rosy-viewpoint of Judaism, but there are also articles on the dark side of Tibetan Buddhism (and it is very dark) for those who are interested in the truth: Tibet - Buddhism - Dalai Lama: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6271 Should the authors of these articles be abused and imprisoned for daring to challenge the widely conceived reputation of Buddhism as being the religion of peace and love and that of the Dalai Lama as a saint, or should those interested be allowed to study the work and come to their own conclusions? The same applies to all the articles, documentaries, etc, about Christianity, Islam, Freemasonry, New World Order, etc.

The Love for Life website also shows how the Rule of Law, the Bar, the Government, the Monarchy, the system of commerce, the local, national and multi/trans-national private corporations, all the courses and careers on offer from our universities, all the educators, scientists, academics and experts, the aristocrats and the Establishment bloodlines have also done NOTHING to end the suffering in the world. The website maps the insanity of a world where there is no help for those in need, just as there was no help available for us when we were victims of terrible bank fraud: "NSW Supreme Court Case - Macquarie Bank/Perpetual Limited vs Fiona Cristian - Victims Of Bank Fraud Condoned By Judges" http://loveforlife.com.au/node/5 (orchestrated, condoned and protected by an international crime syndicate/terrorist organisation of judges, barristers, registrars, lawyers, politicians, banksters, big business representatives, media moguls and other lackeys who, all together, put up a wall of silence despite our trying many, many avenues. After the family home was stolen and business destroyed we were left close to poverty and destitution caring for 4 young daughters. Three years later not much has changed regardless of all our efforts. Where were all the followers of all the religions to help us? Or do we have to be members of those religions to receive help from others involved in them?

The New South Wales Jewish Board of Deputies accused us of being anti - Jewish, see: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6616 and http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6665 because we had posted an excerpt from James von Brun's book: Kill the Best Gentiles: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6054 in which he blames Jews for the problems of the world. Obviously this is not our view because of what we have stated above. We do not hate anyone, whatever religion they follow. We are always open to talk to any religious leader or politician and meet with any judge, member of the Bar, experts, academics, educators etc to share the remedy we offer that heals all the divisions between MAN and MAN, and MAN and the EARTH.

Today, a representative of the New South Wales Jewish Board of Deputies is threatening to close the website down, because they have decided it is anti - Jewish and that we promote racism. What has the New South Wales Jewish Board of Deputies done to end the suffering in the world? Can they show that they are concerned with the suffering of ALL men, women and children AND ARE SEEN TO BE DOING SOMETHING ABOUT IT or are they only concerned with Jewish affairs? If so, they, along with all the other religions that only care for their own, are part of the problem, not part of the solution. The man who rang Arthur today was only concerned with Jewish affairs; he was not interested in our intentions or in anybody else, just as most Christians, Muslims, Sikhs, Catholics, etc, are only interested in their own. While we separate ourselves into groups, dividing ourselves from others with rules, regulations, rituals, procedures and conditions, we will never solve our problems.

No matter what we in the Western World Civilisation of Commerce have been promised by our politicians, religious leaders, scientists, educators, philosophers, etc, for the past two hundred years, all we have seen is ever-increasing destruction of men, women and children and the earth. None of the so-called experts and leaders we have been taught to rely on are coming up with a solution and none of them are taking full-responsibility for the fact that they can't handle the problem. All religious books talk about end times full of destruction and suffering but why do we have to follow this program when there is an alternative to hatred, mayhem and death? Why are our leaders following the program of destruction and death rather than exploring the alternatives? It seems that any mainstream politician, priest or academic are only interested in supporting the RULES OF THE DIVIDE, that maintain the haves and the have nots. For 200+ years, 99% of the world population have been so trained to pass on their responsibility for themselves, others and the earth, that the 1% of the population that make up the leaders of the rest of us are making all the decisions leading to the destruction of all of us and the earth. Let's not forget the education system that brainwashes the 99% of the population that we are free and have equal rights while, in fact, we are feathering the nests of those at the top.

At the root of all our problems is self-centredness, an unwillingness nurtured by the Establishment that keeps us concerned only with our own needs rather than the needs of others around us and the Earth. Instead of creating and releasing acts of love for those around us as gifts to benefit them and the earth, we take, take and take, until there is nothing left. The whole point of the Love for Life website is to show people the root of all our problems and to share the remedy. The extensive research library is there to attract browsers and to provide access to information not available through mainstream channels. If the New South Wales Jewish Board of Deputies can, after careful examination of our work, prove that anything we are saying is wrong, we will be happy to accept their proof. If they cannot, and they are still insistent on closing the website down, they will be showing themselves to be traitors to MAN because they are not interested in pursuing any avenue that can end the suffering in the world.

All religions, corporations and organisations that support and maintain the Western World Civilisation of Commerce are part of the problem because our civilisation is a world of haves and have nots, racism, violence, hatred, poverty, sickness, discrimination, abuse, starvation, homelessness, corruption, collusion, vindictiveness, social unrest, arrogance, ignorance, fear, war and chaos. While we support civilisation, we support death and destruction because ALL civilisations that have ever existed are apocalyptic by design.

If we truly want peace on earth and freedom for all, we have to let go of all that which keeps us divided, and come together as MAN, conscious living co-creators of creation. The Love For Life website offers a remedy to the problems we all face in the form of DO NO HARM COMMUNITIES: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/3641 For more details see here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6511 and here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/3385 - We also highly recommend that everyone read the brilliant Russian books called The Ringing Cedars: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/1125 - The Love For Life Website Homepage also provides lots of inspiring remedy based information: http://loveforlife.com.au - If you want to be kept up to date with our work please register to the Love For Life Mailing List here: http://loveforlife.com.au/content/09/05/14/mailing-list. We usually send two postings per month. Presently (September 2011) there are over 7000 registrations reaching over 500,000 readers across Earth. The website now (September 2011) receives up to 12 million hits per month. Since December 2006, over 100 million people have visited the Love For Life website.

Conscious Love Always
Arthur and Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
17th June 2009

The Cristian Family November 2006

Clarification Regarding Our Intentions
Behind The Use Of Donations

The Love For Life website is offered for free without a fee and without any conditions attached. If people are inspired to donate money, then we accept their gift and have provided an avenue for them to support the work we do through Fiona's Paypal or ANZ bank account http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8515. There is no obligation whatsoever to donate and all are equally welcome to our work and to our "time", whether they donate or not. Over the last 9 years, all the Love For Life work has been put out for free and it has often been donations from supporters that have enabled us to renew the domain name, etc, to keep the website going. While some complain that we have an avenue for donations, others complained when we didn't! Either use it or don't - the choice is yours.

Since Love For Life started March 2005 and website December 2006, Arthur has worked 16 hours a day, 7 days a week unpaid for much of this period, putting together the website and sharing insights to wake people up to what has been done to them, whether through the 11,500+ individual articles, videos, podcasts, debates, discussions, pdf's, research documents, etc, found amongst the 8,500+ posts, as well as helping many, many men and women over the phone, and through email, website correspondence, Facebook and YouTube, and creating the Love For Life food forest vege garden and Love For Life music recording studio. This is our life is a gift commitment to serve MAN/Nature/Earth but we are still severely compromised by "The System" and still have to give to Caesar what is claimed to belong to Caesar, which is where the donations help us.

Fiona & Arthur Cristian
Love For Life
21st July 2014