Is Sir James Goldsmith Diana Spencer's Father?

Is Sir James Goldsmith Diana Spencer's Father?

Diana and Jemima
By the way.. Prince Williams DNA is not royal neither was his mother pictured with Sissie Jemima. Diana was a love child to Daddy Goldsmith… Charles futile attempt to find a way into the Royal House of Stewart bloodline failed…

Zac Goldsmith

William Spencer

Zac: The shy Di goldsmith look
William: The shy Di goldsmith look

Diana & Jemima - Are They Sisters

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Were Diana and Jemima sisters?
By CHRISTOPHER WILSON, Daily Mail
24th August 2004

Jemima and Diana

Jemima and Diana
Jemima and Diana - sisters?

Now we really have heard it all - Princess Diana and Jemima Khan were sisters. Yes, that's the hot news igniting bushfires all over Australia with the 'revelation' in New Idea magazine this week that both women were fathered by swashbuckling tycoon Sir James Goldsmith.

In the case of Jemima, there is no dispute. Born on January 30, 1974, she is acknowledged as being the daughter of Sir 'Jams' and his amply bosomed wife Lady Annabel. In fact, she's the spitting image of her dad.

But Diana? The magazine quotes an 'aristocratic source' as saying that at the time of her conception, her mother Frances Shand Kydd - then Viscountess Althorp - was going through a 'very bad patch' in her marriage to Johnnie Spencer (or Viscount Althorp as he was then).

The source is quoted as saying: 'Her husband was drinking heavily and was beastly to her. She knew James Goldsmith and the rumour was that they had a brief fling. At that time, it's fair to say Goldsmith was a sex maniac.'

Mistresses

Well, that could be said of most other times in his life, too. Goldsmith it was who coined the phrase 'When you marry your mistress you create a job vacancy', and he lived up to the expectations of that suave statement.

There were three marriages for James and lots of mistresses. He came from a red-blooded school of playboys who had no idea what political correctness meant: he took what he wanted, how he wanted, when he wanted.

But - Sir 'Jams' and Di's mother Frances? Let us examine the facts...

The background

The difficulty for rumourmongers is that at the time of Diana's conception, in October 1960, the lives of her mother and James Goldsmith could not have been more different and they could hardly have lived farther apart.

During the early months of the year, Frances, living a rural existence at Park House, Sandringham, was heavily pregnant with her third child, a boy.

When she gave birth, the child was taken from her and she never saw him again: John Spencer, as he was named, died 11 hours after delivery. The experience shattered the 24-year-old woman, who was already deeply religious.

Miscarriage

'She barely left the house after that,' I am told by someone who knew her. 'Despite the terrible shock she underwent, she was keenly aware that her husband expected her to produce a son and heir.'

To Johnnie Spencer, dynasty was everything. And Frances knew it - no matter where she turned, she was reminded of the Spencer family's 200-year-old peerage and her responsibility to further the line.

As soon as possible, the Althorps resumed marital relations and, within weeks, Frances was pregnant again. 'She must have been in a very sorry state, still mourning the loss of her son, and now in the family way again,' said one confidante. 'But, being the person she was, she was determined to see it through.'

Not surprisingly, given her fragile emotional and mental condition, the pregnancy came to nothing. Within weeks, Frances suffered a miscarriage, sending her already-weakened morale tumbling even lower.

To become pregnant a third time within the space of a year was both foolhardy and, in a sense, miraculous - but at least from this last effort a healthy child, Diana, was born.

Depression

'During that year, 1960, Frances barely left Norfolk,' one of her close friends told me. 'She was depressed, wrapped up in herself, constantly worried that she had let her husband down, desperate to become pregnant once more.'

Compare this picture of rural gloom with James Goldsmith's sunsplashed life.

He was already the father of two children (Isabel, by his first wife, the Bolivian heiress Isabel Patino who died in childbirth, and Manes, his son by his secretary and mistress Ginette Lery), and he was leading a peripatetic, glamorous life between Paris, London and the Cote d'Azur.

After leaving Eton, he had set himself the task of becoming a rich man, using the pharmaceutical industry as his vehicle - developing medicines and selling on the companies.

Playboy lifestyle

Now James was on a roll, living in a suite at the Ritz while in London and with Ginette Lery when in Paris. '(Then) there were the attractions of young and pretty girls,' his biographer Geoffrey Wansell wrote. 'James had never lost his appetite for beautiful girls and he had no intention of concealing it.'

And when James wasn't womanising, travelling or tycooning, he was gambling at London's Clermont Club.

In the month when Frances became pregnant with Diana, James was shuttling back and forth from Paris to London.

Aged 27, he was furiously in pursuit of a deal to buy a chain of 28 pharmacies while going through a tumultuous time with his French companies, being forced to defend the very serious accusation that he was importing sub-standard medicines.

And he was completing arrangements to move into a house in London's Regent's Park with Ginette, bringing Isabel and Manes to live with them.

Meanwhile, that winter, Frances was 120 miles and a whole lifestyle away, grimly trying to get pregnant again.

Of course, there's nothing to have stopped one or other party from travelling those 120 miles, casually meeting for the first time, finding each other attractive and ending up in bed for a fling. But where?

Johnnie Spencer always came home for his tea at Park House and Ginette Lery had been installed by James in London. Could it be, perchance, the starcrossed lovers met on a train?

But here is the crucial thing - Frances just wasn't James's type. Thin, nervy and no great flirt, she had none of the things that appealed to the swashbuckling financier.

'What he liked was the exotic, the sexy, the dangerous, the cosmopolitan,' said a friend who knew them both. 'She was none of those things. It wouldn't surprise me if the only two men Frances ever went to bed with were Johnnie Spencer and her second husband Peter Shand Kydd. She just wasn't like that.'

Rumours

James, on the other hand, was. Even so, is this a secret which - according to the Australian magazine - has been whispered about in aristocratic and royal circles for the past 43 years?

Not according to those I know in both camps. 'A clear case of one too many tinnies,' I was told by my aristocratic source. 'It's the Shand Kydd connection that has prompted this talk.

'James's big friend - along with Lord Lucan, Mark Birley and John Aspinall - was Bill Shand Kydd. It was Bill who was the last person to see Lucan alive after he murdered his nanny in 1974.

It was Peter Shand Kydd - Bill's brother - who later married Frances. That's as close as the relationship went - James was Frances's brother-inlaw's best friend.'

But even this doesn't work, since Frances did not meet Peter - or his brother, or his brother's best friend James - until three years after Diana's birth.

Which leaves the 'respected' New Idea magazine with a scoop all of its own.

The problem with the Aussies is that, having no royal family of their own, they believe anything that's said about ours. Can you blame them, though? What comes out of Buckingham Palace and Clarence House these days you couldn't make up.

Link to this article: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-315244/Were-Diana-Jemima-si...

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Royal Watch News

Diana's half-sister Jemima?

Jun 12, 2007, 12:20 GMT

Princess Diana may have been the half-sister of heiress Jemima Khan, is has been revealed.

In Tina Brown's new book 'The Diana Chronicles' the author claims the princess' mother Frances Shand Kydd had a long-running affair with Jemima's father Sir James Goldsmith during her marriage to Earl Spencer.

She suggests Diana - who was born in 1961 - may have been Goldsmith's love child and not Spencer's daughter.

But the writer - who is said to have received a £1 million advance from publishers for the controversial book - could not prove the story.

Goldsmith's daughter Jemima, 33, divorced cricket ace Imran Khan in 2004 after nine yeas of marriage and went on to date actor Hugh Grant, but split from him earlier this year.

Brown's book - published next week - also claims Diana was in love with a Pakistani heart surgeon named Hasnat Khan.

She writes the princess did not love Dodi Al Fayed - with whom she was killed in the Paris car crash in August 1997 - but conducted the romance out of retaliation against the British Royal Family.

(C) BANG Media International

Link to this article: http://www.monstersandcritics.com/people/royalwatch/news/article_1316435...

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

PAKISTAN: MUSHARAF ARRESTS OPPOSITION LEADER, IMRAN KAHN, PRINCESS DIANA'S HALF SISTER'S EX-HUSBAND

Posted By: Rayelan
Date: Saturday, 3 November 2007, 4:40 p.m.

President Musharaf of Pakistan has just suspended the constitution and arrested Imran Kahn,

Who is Imran Kahn?

Before he became the best known face of the Pakistani opposition...

he was best known as the husband of Jemima Kahn.

Who is Jemima Khan?

Many people say that Jemima Khan is the half sister of Princess Diana.

Many also say that Jemima is the one who inspired Diana to pursue liaisons with Muslim men.

Jemima Goldsmith (b. 1974) ex-wife of cricketer Imran Khan and the daughter of billionaire Sir James Goldsmith and Lady Annabel Vane Tempest Stewart.

"Princess Diana may have been the half-sister of heiress Jemima Khan, has been revealed.

In Tina Brown's new book 'The Diana Chronicles' the author claims the princess' mother Frances Shand Kydd had a long-running affair with Jemima's father Sir James Goldsmith during her marriage to Earl Spencer.

She suggests Diana - who was born in 1961 - may have been Goldsmith's love child and not Spencer's daughter."

Royal Watch News Diana's half-sister Jemima?: http://people.monstersandcritics.com/royalwatch/news/article_1316435.php...

Were Diana and Jemima sisters?: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/showbiz/showbiznews.html?...

"...at the time of her (Diana's) conception, her mother Frances Shand Kydd - then Viscountess Althorp - was going through a 'very bad patch' in her marriage to Johnnie Spencer (or Viscount Althorp as he was then).

The source is quoted as saying: 'Her husband was drinking heavily and was beastly to her. She knew James Goldsmith and the rumour was that they had a brief fling."

---end of quote---

James Goldsmith died the same year Diana died.

Link to this article: http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi/noframes/read/112411

Support the Love for Life Campaign and the Cristian Family

Pay with Paymate Express
Not for Commercial Transactions.
Gifts only.
Paymate accepts Mastercard and Visa.

Bank:
Account name:
BSB:
Account number:
SWIFT BIC Code:
Australia New Zealand Banking Group (ANZ)
Fiona Caroline Cristian
012 547
5576 81376
ANZBAU3M

DISCLAIMER

Note: Updated Wednesday 17th June 2009 8.00pm Sydney Time. Love For Life does not support harm doing in any shape or form. However, we are supporters of free speech and post articles, documentaries, etc, that represent a wide cross section of ideas. See the Love For Life extensive research library where over 6000 documents, articles and videos are posted: http://loveforlife.com.au/issues. We clearly see the evidence of the destruction to MAN and the earth that has been caused by ALL religions over the centuries and are therefore not supporters of religions, cults, sects or any group that demands conformity of thought, speech or action, or has rules, regulations or rituals that must be followed. Religions, nationalities and cultural "identities" are formed as a result of the brainwashing we receive from childhood. They are part of the tactics the Establishment uses to keep us all divided from one another and fighting one another.

All religions promote discrimination and division, leading to hatred and even violence and murder. None of them have yet to produce a remedy to all the suffering, poverty, unhappiness and discrimination in the world. If any religion truly had the remedy to all the suffering on earth, there would no longer be any suffering. What have Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, Judaism, atheism and the New Age done to end the suffering in the world?

The Love For Life website has information from all sides on many subjects, whether about Islam, Judaism, Christianity, Law, health, psychology, mind control, vaccination, aspartame, MSG, Chemtrails etc. There are over 6000 articles, documentaries etc on the website and they are so diverse that we are sure that everyone would be able to find something they loved and something they hated, if they took the time to search. If we removed all the articles hated by everyone, there would probably be nothing left! We are not anti anyone but freedom of speech is freedom of speech and no one should condemn the work of another without taking the time to research the subject themselves. Yes, there are articles by those who have a less-than-rosy-viewpoint of Judaism, but there are also articles on the dark side of Tibetan Buddhism (and it is very dark) for those who are interested in the truth: Tibet - Buddhism - Dalai Lama: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6271 Should the authors of these articles be abused and imprisoned for daring to challenge the widely conceived reputation of Buddhism as being the religion of peace and love and that of the Dalai Lama as a saint, or should those interested be allowed to study the work and come to their own conclusions? The same applies to all the articles, documentaries, etc, about Christianity, Islam, Freemasonry, New World Order, etc.

The Love for Life website also shows how the Rule of Law, the Bar, the Government, the Monarchy, the system of commerce, the local, national and multi/trans-national private corporations, all the courses and careers on offer from our universities, all the educators, scientists, academics and experts, the aristocrats and the Establishment bloodlines have also done NOTHING to end the suffering in the world. The website maps the insanity of a world where there is no help for those in need, just as there was no help available for us when we were victims of terrible bank fraud: http://loveforlife.com.au/court_case (orchestrated, condoned and protected by an international crime syndicate/terrorist organisation of judges, barristers, registrars, lawyers, politicians, banksters, big business representatives, media moguls and other lackeys who, all together, put up a wall of silence despite our trying many, many avenues. After the family home was stolen and business destroyed we were left close to poverty and destitution caring for 4 young daughters. Three years later not much has changed regardless of all our efforts. Where were all the followers of all the religions to help us? Or do we have to be members of those religions to receive help from others involved in them?

We have been accused of being anti - Jewish because we had posted an excerpt from James von Brun's book: Kill the Best Gentiles! http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6054 in which he blames Jews for the problems of the world. Obviously this is not our view because of what we have stated above. We do not hate anyone, whatever religion they follow. We are always open to talk to any religious leader or politician and meet with any judge, member of the Bar, experts, academics, educators etc to share the remedy we offer that heals all the divisions between MAN and MAN, and MAN and the EARTH.

Today, a representative of the New South Wales Jewish Board of Deputies is threatening to close the website down, because they have decided it is anti - Jewish and that we promote racism. What has the New South Wales Jewish Board of Deputies done to end the suffering in the world? Can they show that they are concerned with the suffering of ALL men, women and children AND ARE SEEN TO BE DOING SOMETHING ABOUT IT or are they only concerned with Jewish affairs? If so, they, along with all the other religions that only care for their own, are part of the problem, not part of the solution. The man who rang Arthur today was only concerned with Jewish affairs; he was not interested in our intentions or in anybody else, just as most Christians, Muslims, Sikhs, Catholics, etc, are only interested in their own. While we separate ourselves into groups, dividing ourselves from others with rules, regulations, rituals, procedures and conditions, we will never solve our problems.

No matter what we in the Western World Civilisation of Commerce have been promised by our politicians, religious leaders, scientists, educators, philosophers, etc, for the past two hundred years, all we have seen is ever-increasing destruction of men, women and children and the earth. None of the so-called experts and leaders we have been taught to rely on are coming up with a solution and none of them are taking full-responsibility for the fact that they can't handle the problem. All religious books talk about end times full of destruction and suffering but why do we have to follow this program when there is an alternative to hatred, mayhem and death? Why are our leaders following the program of destruction and death rather than exploring the alternatives? It seems that any mainstream politician, priest or academic are only interested in supporting the RULES OF THE DIVIDE, that maintain the haves and the have nots. For 200+ years, 99% of the world population have been so trained to pass on their responsibility for themselves, others and the earth, that the 1% of the population that make up the leaders of the rest of us are making all the decisions leading to the destruction of all of us and the earth. Let's not forget the education system that brainwashes the 99% of the population that we are free and have equal rights while, in fact, we are feathering the nests of those at the top.

At the root of all our problems is self-centredness, an unwillingness nurtured by the Establishment that keeps us concerned only with our own needs rather than the needs of others around us and the Earth. Instead of creating and releasing acts of love for those around us as gifts to benefit them and the earth, we take, take and take, until there is nothing left. The whole point of the Love for Life website is to show people the root of all our problems and to share the remedy. The extensive research library is there to attract browsers and to provide access to information not available through mainstream channels. If the New South Wales Jewish Board of Deputies can, after careful examination of our work, prove that anything we are saying is wrong, we will be happy to accept their proof. If they cannot, and they are still insistent on closing the website down, they will be showing themselves to be traitors to MAN because they are not interested in pursuing any avenue that can end the suffering in the world.

All religions, corporations and organisations that support and maintain the Western World Civilisation of Commerce are part of the problem because our civilisation is a world of haves and have nots, racism, violence, hatred, poverty, sickness, discrimination, abuse, starvation, homelessness, corruption, collusion, vindictiveness, social unrest, arrogance, ignorance, fear, war and chaos. While we support civilisation, we support death and destruction because ALL civilisations that have ever existed are apocalyptic by design.

If we truly want peace on earth and freedom for all, we have to let go of all that which keeps us divided, and come together as MAN, conscious living co-creators of creation. The Love For Life website offers a remedy to the problems we all face in the form of DO NO HARM COMMUNITIES: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/3641 For more details see here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6511 and here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/3385 - We also highly recommend that everyone read the brilliant Russian books called The Ringing Cedars: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/1125 - The Love For Life homepage/front-page also provides lots of inspiring remedy based information: http://loveforlife.com.au - If you want to be kept up to date with our work please register to the Love For Life mailing list here: http://loveforlife.com.au/campaign_list We usually send two postings per month. Presently there are over 5000 registrations reaching over 200,000 readers globally. The website now receives over 2 million strikes per month with June 2009 heading close to (or over) 3 million strikes.

Conscious Love Always
Arthur and Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
17th June 2009