Love for Life

This Article Will Offend Many of You - Read it Anyway
Global Warming and Iraq
by Mitch Battros
Earth Changes Media

27th June 2008

I am beside myself on how easy it is to manipulate Americans just by using scare tactics. You would think we learned our lesson with the Bush regime . . . but we didn't. Just when I thought it could never happen again . . . it did.

See full articles on 'No Ice on North Pole' and 'James Hansen Embarrassment to NASA' on the ECM front page headlines.

Just five short years ago, the world witnessed a scam played on its own people right here in the United States of America. We were sold a pack of lies by the Bush regime based on a true-and-tested method of "scaring you into submission".

You were told Saddam Hussein and Iraq tried to purchase "yellow cake" uranium from Niger to complete their nuclear weapon. It was a LIE. You were told Hussein had weapons of mass destruction WMD --- it was a LIE. You were told 9/11 = Iraq --- it was a LIE. Now you are told Iran will have nuclear weapons any day --- it is a LIE.

The global warming regime is using the very same formula the Bush regime used with Iraq. Create an 'evil doer', demonize and create false scenarios, scare the public, then come forward as the 'white knight' to save the day, but with a martyrs slant.

Instead of Saddam Hussein (evil doer), we have human polluters (evil doers). Instead of Weapons of Mass Destruction, we have Global Warming. Instead of the (mushroom cloud), we have the world ice shelves melting.

Now lets take a closer look

The current warming trend and coming cooling trend have very little to do with pollution. This is not about being pro-environmental and having a clean world; it is about manipulating you (scaring you) into a dictated lifestyle. No . . . not for the sake of the world, but for the sake of MONEY. (hear George Carlin on 'critical thinking below).

I know of no-one who is "pro pollution". What the global warming regime has created is for you to feel shame or "be damned" for not supporting this 1988 made up word 'global warming'. It is no different then what happened in 2003 if someone were to dare speak against the invasion of Iraq. You were immediately 'damned' as a trader who should be shot on sight, or at least made to leave the country.

Just as Saddam Hussein had nothing to do with 9-11, so is the case with pollution. For those who have been following my reports over the years know quite well I am all for "clean air and water". I have no doubt I do more for the environment than 70% of our viewers. But this has nothing to do with "weather or climate". In the same manner, it was mostly unanimous among the world community that Saddam Hussein is a bad person and is better off not leading any country. Of course the same could be said for Bubba Bush, but that's beside the point. The point being, the removal of Saddam Hussein has no effect on the stopping of terrorism, or in any way stop another 9-11.

If we passed a law tomorrow for arresting all polluters and placing them in jail, it would have no measurable affect on weather or climate change. Sure, we would be better off having clean air and water, I'm all for that, but in either case it has no measurable affect on the causal outcome.

James Hansen is the Bubba Bush of global warming. It was Hansen who in 1988 came up with this made up word "global warming". And what was it based on? The same wrong, disingenuous, and out right lies just as the report on weapons of mass destruction. In simple terms . . . made up data to show cause for an agenda driven plan of action. It was a false string of manipulated data for the purpose of convincing a naive public to take action. In other words . . . you were scammed!

Do you think the Bush regime will use the same tactics with Iran . . . to hood-wink the public and the world into believing the United States is in great danger and needs to take immediate action?

1) George Carlin video on 'Critical Thinking': http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2KgBVKDvK14&feature=related

2) George Carlin video on 'Critical Thinking': http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ktIECyzf4YM&feature=related

Global Warming or Warmer Globe -- Who is Telling the Truth?

Lets take a look inside the mind of the global warming zombies who deliver their coveted mantra of humans are the sole cause of the made up name 'global warming'. His name is Dr. Jonathan Overpeck. He is a senior member of the consortium of scientists who make up what is known as the IPCC. (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change).

There has been a recent rash of articles bouncing around the media. Some of which are based on a recent study by Dr. Jonathan Overpeck - Paleoclimatologist, Professor of Geosciences at the University of Arizona and Director of ISPE Earth studies. But even more media reports are focused on an even larger and perhaps more significant research study regarding ice core samples published by Thomas F. Stocker of the Physics Institute at the University of Bern, in Switzerland titled "Ice Core Record Extended".

Of course this grabbed my attention and quickly after I was on the hunt for confirmation and verification. Well no sooner did I initiate my focus on details that I found glairing discrepancies of many reports and subjective commentaries on the major study from Thomas Stocker on ice core samples. To read some of the mainstream and science commentaries, you would think a rock hard solid no-doubt-about-it verdict had been established. This couldn't be further from the truth. In fact, the author and researcher himself (Stocker) suggest the outcome looks like we are simply in a "natural cycle" the Earth has seen many times before.

The following is a list of questions I had asked senior IPCC member Dr. Overpeck in what was billed at "The Battle in Seattle" http://rs6.net/tn.jsp?e=001P7LTzLfOBmUGU8JVXdKi5uJjyhWR_HsapTxe386bAEYKX... over so-called global warming. The answers received in our head-to-head debate will either make you roll with laughter, or cringe with anger.

1) You state: "the Arctic system is into a seasonally ice-free state not seen for more than one million years". Do you suggest it has never been seen? If it has, how often and what do you believe to be the "source" of its (fluctuation)?

2) You state: "A team of researchers were unable to identify any natural processes that might slow the de-icing of the Arctic." Are you suggesting every cooling period, such as the little-ice age in the beginning of the 14th century, "is not" caused by a natural cyclical event? If it was a natural warming cycle, what was the cause?

3) Your study says: "Melting sea ice has already resulted in dramatic impacts for the indigenous people and animals in the Arctic, which includes parts of Alaska, Canada, Russia, Siberia, Scandinavia and Greenland". Are you suggesting "dramatic impacts" for these regions have never occurred before?

4) Your environmental studies workshop was organized by the NSF Arctic System Science Committee, which is chaired by you. The National Science Foundation funded the meeting. How much money did you receive?

5) By studying natural data loggers such as ice cores and marine sediments, scientists have a good idea what the "natural envelope" for Arctic climate variations has been for the past million years, says Overpeck. Can you tell us what is the "natural envelope"? what does it consist of regarding its causal factors? Exactly what are the variables and its relation to todays warming and cooling trends? Is this study reflective of carbons "only"?

6) You say: "In the past, researchers have tended to look at individual components of the Arctic. What we did for the first time is really look at how all of those components work together." Does this include solar influence?

7) In your study you say "While the scientists identified one feedback loop that could slow the changes, they did not see any natural mechanism that could stop the dramatic loss of ice." Does this mean if we were somehow magically able to stop all man-made pollution tomorrow, nothing would happen regarding the current warming trend and ice cap melting?

8) Your report states: "Such thawing could release additional greenhouse gases stored in the permafrost for thousands of years, which would amplify human-induced climate change." But isn't it also true the vast majority of today's carbon count is in fact emitted from the oceans and melting ice stored over thousands and millions of years?

9) Your report says: "humans could step on the brakes by reducing carbon dioxide emissions. The trouble is we don't really know where the threshold is." Can you qualify your statement by telling us what percentage humans contribute: 1%, 3%, 10%, 20% or 100%?

Go to the following links to read what really is going on. Here is one example of what you will see in the following articles. "Dr. Overpeck, can you give us your thought's of the recent (2005) photos from SOHO?" Overpeck's answer: "What's SOHO"

Battle-in-Seattle: Global Warming - Fact or Fraud: http://earthchangesmedia.com/publish/article-9162522187.php

What Global Warming Enthusiasts Don't Want You to Know:http://earthchangesmedia.com/publish/article-9162522188.php

STILL MORE TO COME --------

Mitch Battros Speaking Engagements

LECTURE DESCRIPTION:

Solar Cycle 24 has begun - and it has been predicted by NASA, NOAA and ESA to be up to 50% stronger than its 'record breaking' predecessor Cycle 23 which produced the largest solar flare ever recorded. The Sun will reach its 'apex' (maximum) in late 2011 into 2012. Scientific research along with ancient text documents suggests the Mayan Calendar ending on December 21st 2012 may very well be connected to solar activity. Mitch Battros' research shows that charged particles emitted by the Sun in the way of solar flares, CME's and coronal holes are the cause of extreme earth changes such as earthquakes, volcanoes, hurricanes, and tornadoes. His research also indicates the very same magnetic flux which effects the Earth, will also affect humans. In fact, Battros will demonstrate how the magnetic field which surrounds the Earth is similar to the magnetic field which surrounds every living thing.

"I believe it will be the magnetic influence produced by the Sun which will usher in what is described by our ancient ancestors as "the transition" bringing us to a new state-of-being". (Mitch Battros)

ENDORSEMENTS: http://earthchangesmedia.com/Solar_Rain_Endorsements01.htm

ORDER BOOKS HERE:

https://www.earthchangesmedia.com/amember/signup.php

July 18th - 20th: Mayan Date of Destiny - sponsored by the Edgar Cayce Foundation and A.R.E. I will be presenting a lecture and workshop along with Mayan Elder, Carlos Barrios, Adrian Gilbert, and Geoff Stray.

Virginia Beach, Virginia

NEW Conference Link:
http://www.edgarcayce.org/conferences/HQ80701/description.html

November 21st - 24th: Secrets 2008 Conference - I will be presenting a lecture and workshop along with Nick Begich, William Henry, Chet Snow, Nancy Talbot, Linda Moulton Howe, Richard Hoagland, Robin Falkov.

Tempe, Arizona
NEW Conference Link: http://www.chetsnow.com/signs.html

***For my science community - "Solar Rain" and "Global Warming" has been endorsed by some of the top astronomers and solar physicists in the world. Rest assured the hard science community is well represented in all of my presentations.

***For my metaphysical community - "Solar Rain" has been endorsed by some of the top historical scholars and spiritual leaders of todays times. Rest assured the ancient wisdom community is well represented in all of my presentations.

Endorsements:http://earthchangesmedia.com/Solar_Rain_Endorsements01.htm

Order Books Here:
https://www.earthchangesmedia.com/amember/signup.php

Preparing For Coming Earth Changes

I have begun to note it is not just the "external" (earth changes) which is shifting, but humans as well.

Remember: we too have magnetic fields which surround each of us. I think it is not unrealistic to conjecture what is happening "externally" is also happening "internally". I believe current science will acknowledge this notion, showing the Sun's "charged particles" and its influence on Earth's magnetic field is the impetus of change. In-like, this same causal effect occurs with human magnetic fields ushering in a change or "transition". Perhaps this is what our Mayan elders are trying to tell us--

We are coming into "cycle 24" which was predicted "live" on ECM Radio Hour by NASA stating cycle 24 will be up to 50 percent stronger than "Cycle 23" in which we witnessed the largest solar flare ever recorded. This means larger earth changing events in the way of earthquakes, volcanoes, hurricanes, and various storms. But it also means we (humans) will be bombarded with charged particles via severe geomagnetic storms from the Sun. (Mitch Battros)

ARE YOU PREPARED FOR THE CHANGES AHEAD?: http://rs6.net/tn.jsp?e=001P7LTzLfOBmX9LKXuPGnM27x5SD0aIU3eH3AOpCn8mOpVJ...

Link to this article: http://earthchangesmedia.com/secure/3247.326/article-9162522189.php