Love for Life

Phonetics

Phonetics - actually that is phoen-etics, given to us by the Phoenicians. They gave us "lan-goo-ag", a substance that when fired from the cannon of a ship, tore the sails and mast and left the opponent "dead in the water"

For instance; you speak of Felony!

What is a Felony?

Is this not the Fall of Man?

Is not the Fall of Man, he who FELL ON the earth from a height above the earth?

Is this not the return of he who rose into the air (went INVERSE) or went internal (DNA) and has been filed on his return to earth. (FELON) the second time?

(Would this be the secondary market (commodity index items trading over-the-counter) like a Geiger counter?)

When you appear in DISTRICT COURT (a tax district) does not the bailiff say: “All rise” when the judge entered the room?

Is that act not rising up from the face of the earth going to heaven? Does not the Felon return from above at a subsequent event?

Something else to consider here too is: The state cannot weigh the subject matter when it rises in the air, because; the subject matter has been burned up when it rises and is converted to pure energy (weightless). The subject matter does have a weight, but it is in the invisible form of heat; thus a charged instrument is required to measure or weigh the living matter (DNA) rising in the atmosphere.

Would not the reference to trading over-the-counter be an indication of Passover; or the 3 Wise Men coming from the EAST (following the star of the east – US Marshal) and then not being able to return the way they came, but returned another way (foreign). Over the Geiger counter true or not!?

Our reference to a Geiger counter can probably be identified as an Electronic Funds transfer in the banks - - and now it is done on earth as it is in heaven. If there is a corruption, such as co-mingling of funds, then the electronic funds transfer cannot occur. For instance, a wire transfer does not work for this because it originates with a debt instrument and corrupts the accrual – The debt item itself does not identify the principal. It only is evidence of an unidentified claim on the account – thus the fiduciary cannot pass title because the said undisclosed principal is a lien upon the property in question. Someone is a holder of debt somewhere.

When a driver license is suspended for instance, is that body not Raised up from the earth (weightless)? Now the evidence cannot be identified in or by the State. They need assistance do they not? Is that assistance Federal (Federal jurisdiction and evidence is taken indirectly: the basis of contract)?

Eyes to see and ears to hear! Thus a witness is needed.

The police departments and Bureau of Prisons hire and train martial arts employees to make pre-emptive strikes to make untrained citizens think they must defend themselves, having been threatened by the unfamiliar behavior of the bureaucrat provoking an incident. These type of court actions are called NISI PRIUS in the more ancient world.

The most difficult position one can find themselves in is sitting down in the court room, best to wait outside till court is called or more specifically till the strawman has been called.

Upon strolling into the courtroom, when the Judge/Justice asks if you are: Strawman!! You have a couple of options here:

a) Your offer of communications is accepted; as the attorney-in-fact I request that you please ask the prosecutor which agent of the voluntarily insolvent corporation is sought here today!!

b) The key to an arraignment is that the judge is going to ask you for your name. If you give your name, you are already in the public side because you testified. So the first thing you do when they call the case, and before anyone speaks—or if they speak to you, you question them or you request (note best to ask the questions first!), “As the Attorney-in-Fact I am here to request for the purpose of securing a bond for my client, issued under personal recognizance, without charge to me or my client, and without levy of any public fees or costs for the purpose of preparing this event so I may enter a plea for my client after the bond has been secured. All of the charging instruments have been accepted and returned for value and I do not anticipate disputing any of the facts stated in the charging instrument. If you do not offer me the bond, I will take your refusal to offer me the bond that the assessment for charges have not been produced and that any contract is in dishonor and I will put that contract into involuntary bankruptcy as the security, and the charges to support the bond for appearance in this matter, in order to plead to the facts.”

law came from "llall", the "l" was originally (normally) the double-"ll" which came from heiroglyphs as "two legs walking".

the "shetar" was originally the "shealltar", which is where we get our "sheltar" [the law]. but "law" is an obstruction because the "two legs" walking around on both ends, shows that "law" is constantly changing.

1. A court is - “place where a contract or agreement is made”. The court is a "commercial register”.

2. Principle of agreements -- the third type -- if somebody fails to respond in protest; you have in essence got a default agreement with them.

3. You’re trying to write an agreement. And the first thing you need in an agreement is the name of the second party. Note: the Court is working on an assumption, not an agreement in the fact.

4. So the first thing you do is get the name so the record is set there. "Well sir, what is your name? Question number 1.

5. Pay attention to the factor that most Judges/Justices prefer to give their title, NOT THEIR NAME.

6. “Would you please spell that for me”

7. “Your offer of communications is accepted and your dishonor is returned. Please state your name, NOT YOUR TITLE”

8. “Is that TITLE/NAME, the same TITLE/NAME registered with the Secretary of State?”

9. Now if the judge won't give his name, then Elvick goes ahead anyway with question number two because if somebody fails to respond or is standing mute it literally means you’re in control and they're waving their rights. Question number 2: "Do you have a claim against me?" He'll either stand mute or he will decline to answer the question - he's going to try to do a demur to what's going on.

10. So the second issue is: "Do you have a claim against me?" Getting no response or a non-responsive response, he goes on to Question number 3. "Do you know anyone who does have a claim against me?" Now, he didn't say any "person" or "anybody that" -- it's anyone "who" has a claim against me. He is talking about a non-fiction, living principal. So what he's doing is he's living and breathing the real world here. He's not pleading into a fiction or a legislative venue, which is the major legislative premise.

11. Now if he gets a "No" answer or a non-responsive answer then he goes on.

12. At this point you can direct the Judge: 1st position as a request statement “This authorized representative does request of TITLE/NAME to please direct the prosecutor to answer whether there are any more charges” – this cuts down on any more assumed charges. On a good day, the prosecutor will refuse to answer and the Judge will dismiss the case on the spot!!!!

IMPORTANT NOTE: WAS THE ORIGINAL PAPER TO GET INTO COURT BASED ON A COMPLAINT (NO SWORN AFFIDAVIT REQUIRED), AN INFORMATION (SWORN AFFIDAVIT) OR INDICTMENT (CHARGES MUST BE PRESENT)

13. At this point you can direct the Judge: 2nd position as a request statement “This authorized representative does request of TITLE/NAME to please direct the prosecutor to answer whether the assessment for the charges are in his/her possession” – this eliminates the assumption of the agreement in question, without the assessment there can be no charges. This primarily puts the prosecutor into trouble, as he is now practicing law without a license and that is a felony!!!!

14. At this point you can direct the Judge: 3rd position as a request statement “This authorized representative does request of TITLE/NAME to please direct the prosecutor to provide the assessment for the charges along with the certified audit trail of all transactions including the voucher and all disbursement documents and receipts”

15. At this point you direct the Judge: 4th position as a request statement “This authorized representative does request of TITLE/NAME to please direct the prosecutor to provide the serial placement number of his/her bar card” NOTE - a lot of times the prosecutor is not qualified to even be there and the bar card which is an OMB number can be used as the number for a surety bond.

16. At this point you direct the Judge: 5TH position as a request statement “This authorized representative does request of TITLE/NAME to please state if you have subject matter jurisdiction.” NOTE – if there are no further charges, no assessment for the current charges and no subject matter jurisdiction the court is now in a forfeit position

17. 6th position as a request statement: “This authorized representative does request an appearance bond of personal recognizance at no cost to plead to the charge” (this in effect puts your name on the account and thus charges the account, thereby when appearance bond is discharged (by appearance) this puts the operators of the account and the holder in due course in to immediate INVOLUNTARY BANKRUPTCY. If there is no assessment for the charges, more than likely they will not issue an appearance bond and you can therefore issue a subrogation surety bond.

18. Should anyone hand you any piece of paper, in particular a paper in which they want you to read the assumed “charges” turn the paper over and state that you can not see anything and then direct/request the Judge to have the prosecutor read it.

19. When the reading of the charges occur – DO NOT LET THEM WAIVE THE READING OF THE CHARGES - once more repeat the request for the assessment for the charges, persist on this point – once past that plead guilty, state you are not disputing any of the facts in the matter.

20. “Now, request for the finding of fact and conclusion of law”

21. USE YOUR INTUITION AND WHETHER TO USE next phrase after the gavel as been used (the dis-charge)!!!!! "This authorized representative does request the order of the court be released unto me immediately."

22. It's not a question it's a request -- he's not moving the court because if he moves the court he's asking for a benefit.

23. I request that the Order of the Court be released to me immediately". In other words, what he is saying is "If we have no first hand witnesses or claimants present -- what the hell are you guys operating on? Give me your marching orders". That's what he's saying. "I'm demanding to see the order of the court."

24. When he makes these three questions and request/statement, he has created a small claims court. And a small claims court has different rules and procedures.

25. There are no Titles of Nobility. Not only are there no Titles of Nobility, but also lawyers basically can't be present.

26. The parties themselves do the claims. And we will know who has got a claim and who doesn't.

27. If there are no claims then there is a default to our appearance to investigate.

28. So what he's really doing is he's brought an inquest hearing on a 'show cause'.

29. You are doing a coroner's inquest or a probate into the matter of any claims against you in common law (?).

30. Well the court that we're taking them into is what the Magna Charta refers to as an "ecclesiastical court of conscience."

31. And in that inquest, only those people that testify and have first hand information as to the claims are coming forward.

32. If you are conducting a public inquest into the matter concerning any claims that may be brought against you, and no claims are brought, the matter is concluded, the public inquest is over and you are out of there.

33. Now, there are some variations that can happen with this.

34. Some of these judges get cute, and they say, "My name is judge so and so." Well, that's a fiction. That isn't a real party. That isn't a name that can enter the "commercial register" because "Judge So and So" is a public name.

35. The judge or the prosecutor might say, "The State/Province/Department of ______ has a claim against you".

36. At that stage of the game, you've got to alter your questions a little bit.

37. "Is there anyone present to press the claim against me in any alleged name other than their own?"

38. Now, if the prosecutor wants to stand up and press that claim, then you demand that he be sworn in to testify under oath as to the damage in the claim in which he is testifying... There's your inquest.

39. He is not going to swear in. If he fails to swear in, then at that stage of the game you say, "There being no claimants who have sworn in under penalty of perjury today with a first hand damage claim, it would appear as though there is no more public business concerning me, I'm withdrawing".

40. Don't allow the Judge to hoodwink you into allegiance.

41. Do not follow the orders of the judge, the judge became the head and you become the tail.

42. It's either the judge's private business that's going to go on in there, which is the business of the corporate state, or your private rights under public law.

43. If you traverse into his business, you've just abandoned your claim.

44. Now, let me explain what "order" is. These people are all acting under the major premise of a legislative venue. They MUST have delegation of orders that give them any authority to do anything they're doing. And obviously, once he's gone through the first 3 questions: The name, the claim, knows anyone who has a claim. If there's a non-response then nobody has come forward with a claim against the one asking the questions.

45. There is a parallel commercial world and universe in bookkeeping that parallels the legal judicial bookkeeping.

46. Where would that order come from? The order would have to come out of the Secretary of the Treasury. Because he's the man with the liability for all the books and he's the one that appraised the security instrument. So, if they don't have an Order going back to the Secretary of the Treasury, they don't have any authority to collect the debt.

47. When they issue a citation, complaint, information or an indictment, somebody's already established a commercial value on that instrument. And although there might be a set of papers in the administrative process, like the court documents, we know, and reason, logic and common sense tells you -- there's also a banking or a commercial set of documents in a series of accounts paralleling it.

48. So that if an indictment goes out, let's say on tax evasion, there's got to be an appraisal that says that the appraised value of this indictment is $100,000.00.

49. So, in the Treasury, whenever an indictment goes out on that basis, they now claim an asset by way of the security instrument of $100,000.00.

50. And then there is a corresponding side to the ledger sheet which is an accounts receivable of $100,000.00 to back up the asset. DOUBLE ENTRY BOOKKEEPING, right?

51. If you don't address the commercial aspects of the citation, complaint, information or indictment, then they've got an asset on their books, which remain on their books, and if it's not adjudicated then they've got accounts receivable that’s aging.

52. If you come back and dishonor the asset -- the indictment -- then, in essence their books are out of whack because there's a dispute as to the asset, but there's still an accounts receivable of $100,000.00 that they're looking for.

53. Now if they don't have an order to collect the debt from someone who's the holder in due course. I.e., the Secretary of the Treasury, then they are acting as rogue agents in their capacity.

54. When he goes into court like this he is exercising his rights under public international law to determine what kind of business these people are trying to do with him.

55. Remember, you are there in your "public capacity". Because under public international law, private rights are recognized. But as soon as you engage in a co-business venture in their private business, you're in their court in a business venture, you're in an agreement and everything is proceeding.

56. "I request the Order of the court be released to me immediately", is the demand that if we're here on public business involving me, I want to know who's behind the claim. With those requests and statements he has just made a public verbal demand for a Bill of Particulars! He has removed any assumptions/presumptions around the agreement in question. He's trying to find out the nature and cause of the claim. Okay?

57. Having no response from anyone then he would most likely make the following statement, "It would appear as though I have completed my public business here today. There being no further public business to carry on, I'm withdrawing." Now you're giving your equitable notice to the parties present, right? You turn and walk out.

Roger: Right, you don’t care what he says, you just go on, and you just go through the routine and direct it at him. Usually they’ll give their name to start with. You see anybody that addresses anything in there you’re taking them into your court. And if you start acknowledging any of their procedures in there, then they are going to assume you’re in theirs. Because all they want you to do is recognize the accuser, either by body language, testimony, or something so you become a witness against yourself.

1. Those circuit courts are geared to track the circuitry of the human body or the human mind.

2. There are actual charges that have to occur in the mind, in order to make an intelligent decision.

3. Well, the direct exam is examining your "conscious mind" and the cross examination examines the "subconscious".

4. Your subconscious mind is totally innocent of everything, OK? It believes everything your conscious mind tells it. That's why people have to stay in "good standing" with their own consciences, because, see, what they are trying to get you to do is to alter the agreement that your "conscious" mind and your subconscious" mind have, and that's when your immune system breaks down. You see? It's based on evidence of this kind of circuitry. That's [the] point I'm trying to make. And the circuitry has to put the harness on the weak energy of nature and mankind. You’ve got to be totally honest, to be able to keep your immune system together.

5. We start crowding them for this kind of testimony, in their affairs, that's when they have to back away from us.

6. If we press them to the point they are going to have to compromise their conscience, when we bring the fact of the matter to them.

7. The “Law” only knows two types of persons; “employees” and “employers” as identified by the “Tax Identification Number (S.I.N./S.S.N.).

8. The “employer” is the Preferred Stockholder of the “Corporate Government” while the “employee” is the Common Stockholder of the “Corporate Government”.

9. The Preferred Stockholder has this position via the “Birth Certificate”.

10. The Preferred Stockholder is holding both the “debit” and the “credit” side of the “account”.

11. Let's take a "ticket". That would represent the "common stock".

12. What the Judge is doing here is he wants you to agree, or agree to be the collateral on it (whatever the charge is, i.e. Ticket, Non-Filing etc), or give some value to the charge.

13. When you pay money, which is the "public exchange", you cannot reduce a negative with another negative.

14. If, for instance you're faced with a fine that's a serious criminal charge, and you pay them with "public money", that's a bribe.

15. When you request that the court release the order to you -- what you are asking them to do is give you the "common stock".

16. Release the stock or release the "order of the court" to me immediately.

17. It (the "order") represents the One World Order, for one thing. It's a "money order" or it could be a "work order".

18. Whom-ever has presented the “charge(s)” is the one with the “claim”, whomever is with the claim is the payee.

19. When you accept the account for value, they have [it] withdrawn from your account. Now they have a "tax obligation" on their hands.

20. When you accept the property for value, they are the payees, because they are in possession. We're saying, "I accept that claim", because they are holding a "lien" on the "claim", and they have it in their possession, so they are the payees in fact. And the payee in fact has got to answer to the Internal Revenue for the funds.

21. When you accept it for value that means you accept the claim.

22. I accept the claim, and I am the taxpayer in fact, because I'll allow them [to] pass through "my account" to effect payment.

23. Well, they have to release to you the order of the court. They have to release "the claim" to me -- the money, the account.

24. Well, it's already prepaid. See, because I am the principle. They got the money from me in the first place.

25. You already paid the claim, and you are asking them to release the claim that you have already paid.

26. So what you do, your job is to interrogate the witness. You ask the three magic questions and you don’t go beyond that.

27. You see when you are interrogating him you don’t care what he says because anything he says can and will be used against him. He’s testifying not you! That’s the essence here of taking testimony because when you enter it into these courts here it inverts. That’s why the Miranda warning is here, anything you say can and will be used against you, it doesn’t say maybe.

Roger: You see in this jurisdiction we are exercising now, its all international. That means here that you and I, as the owners of the account. That means here that a sovereign then owner of the account doesn’t do any of the work. The sovereign has employees that do the work. When there’s a credit and a debit, we have two employees then, one is the state and one is federal, they are handling matching funds.

UCC 10-104 Laws Not Repealed.

[ (1) ] The Article on Documents of Title (Article 7) does not repeal or modify any laws prescribing the form or contents of documents of title or the services or facilities to be afforded by bailees, or otherwise regulating bailees’ businesses in respects not specifically dealt with herein; but the fact that such laws are violated does not affect the status of a document of title which otherwise complies with the definition of a document of title (Section 1-201).

Official Comment

This section subordinates the Article of this Act on Documents of Title (Article 7) to the more specialized regulations of particular classes of bailees under other legislation and international treaties. Particularly, the provisions of that Article are superseded by applicable inconsistent provisions regarding the obligation of carriers and the limitation of their liability found in federal legislation dealing with transportation by water (including the Harter Act, act of February 13, 1893, 27 Stat. 445, and the Carriage of Goods by Sea act, Act of April 16, 1936, 49 Stat. 1207); the Warsaw Convention on International Air Transportation, 49 Stat. 3000, and Section 20 (11) of the Interstate Commerce Act, Act of February 20, 1887, 24 Stat. 386, as amended. The Documents of Title provisions of this Act supplement such legislation largely in matters other than obligations of the bailee, e.g., form and effects of negotiation, procedure in the case of lost documents, effect of over issue, possibility of rapid transmission. Cross Reference: Section 7-103.

http://www.union.edu/PUBLIC/ECODEPT/kleind/eco024/documents/regulation/i...

UCC 1-107 Waiver or Renunciation of Claim or Right After Breach

Any claim or right arising out of an alleged breach can be discharged in whole or in part without consideration by a written waiver or renunciation signed and delivered by the aggrieved party.

Official Comment

This section makes consideration unnecessary to the effective renunciation or waiver of rights or claims arising out of an alleged breach of a commercial contract where such renunciation is in writing and signed and delivered by the aggrieved party. Its provisions, however, must be read in conjunction with the section imposing an obligation of good faith. (Section 1-203). There may, of course, also be an oral renunciation or waiver sustained by consideration but subject to Statute of Frauds provisions and to the section of Article 2 on Sales dealing with the modification of signed writings (Section 2-209). As is made express in the latter section this Act fully recognizes the effectiveness of waiver and estoppel.

Cross References: Section 1-203, 2-201 and 2-209. And see Section 2-719.

Definitional Cross references:

“Aggrieved party”. Section 1-201. (2) means a party entitled to resort to a remedy.

“Rights”. Section 1-201. (36) includes remedies.

“Signed”. Section 1-201. (39) includes any symbol executed or adopted by a party with presentation to authenticate a writing.

“Written”. Section 1-201.(46) or “writing” includes printing, typewriting or any other intentional reduction to tangible form.

ADDITIONAL NOTES –

Properly prepared documents, which are notarized and sent to the court before the court date, will a lot of times neutralize the position.

1) An Authorized Representative – Employer ID document

2) A “Notice of Request for Waiver” – this waives any fee, fine, cost or charge the court is looking for and a default position by the court is automatic record in the fact of INVOLUNTARY BANKRUPTCY gained through dishonor and obstruction.

3) A “Notice of Request for Remedy” – this instructs the court to produce the assessment for the charge (whether this is a citation, complaint, information, statement or indictment) and is an automatic default position of the court to fail in their task of providing the assessment.

4) A “Notice of Request for Appearance Bond” – this instructs the court to have an appearance bond made up (at no cost to you) in order to “charge” the case. Failure on behalf of the court now allows you to utilize the dishonor/obstruction as a grant of their signature by accommodation to be used in a subrogation surety bond.

5) A “Subrogation Surety Bond” for all parties – judge, clerk of the court, prosecutor, etc.

6) Additionally, properly prepared Ships Papers are a good idea, in light of the “Anti-terrorist Legislation and pending Patriot Act II” on the horizon: these would be

a) Certified Blood Work – Tuberculosis free, HIV free etc

b) Public Psychiatric Assessment – check your local courts to determine which one is best

c) Private Psychiatric Assessment

These words are now your words, you are the new owner and it is up to you to determine how to use them and when to use.

The influence of the fiction extends to every department of the jurist's activities.

Yet it cannot be said that this circumstance has ever caused the legal profession much embarrassment. Laymen frequently complain of the law: they very seldom complain that it is founded upon fictions. They are more apt to express discontent when the law has refused to adopt what they regard as an expedient and desirable fiction. Perhaps, too, the fiction has played its part in making the law "uncognoscible" to the layman. The very strangeness and boldness of the legal fiction has tended to stifle his criticisms, and has no doubt often led him to agree modestly with the writer of Sheppard's Touchstone, that "the subject matter of law is somewhat transcendent, and too high for ordinary capacities."2

"if the tongue/language iz not correct, then what iz being said/communicated iz not what iz meant; and if what iz being said/communicated iz not what iz meant then what must be done wyll remain left not-done; and if every-thing that iz important/meaningful remains left not-done then the-trooth along with all history, custom and troo-sciense will all soon deteriorate/fall into ruin; and then the people/beings wyll alle be standing around in a helpless state and in totalle confushion. so, it iz for this reazon alone then that there must be no arbitrariness or vagueness in what iz being said. this matterz absolutely and above every-thing/alle else." - confucious

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This information is for those in the Study Group studying the concepts of GRACE/Public Policy. This is a private study group and to participate is $10 a month to have information email or $15.00 to have it mailed. To participate please send your funds to Barbara Busch, P.O. Box 88-1007, Los Angeles, CA 90009. Email address is bbusch @ iwlink.com.

Also don’t forget to include your email with your funds. Thanks!! This is on the honor system so please be honorable and it is up to you to keep track of the monthly participation fees. I know all of you are honorable but many of you are forgetful! Without the small fee of your participation I can’t provide this information.