Love for Life

6th October 2008

Ajent J sent a message using the contact form at http://loveforlife.com.au/contact.

Comments below:

Notice of Understanding and Intent And Claim of Right

(under-standing: Taking a legal position beneath someone else -
joinder/give up rights)

Whereas it is my understanding Australia is a common law jurisdiction,
and,

(common law is the base level, then as you go up the fictitious pyramid,
each level or floor cannot "hear" you if you try to bring in common law
arguements)

Whereas it is my understanding equality before the law is paramount and
mandatory, and,

Whereas it is my understanding a statute is defined as a legislated rule
of society which has been given the force of law, and,

Whereas it is my understanding a society is defined as a number of people
joined by mutual consent to deliberate, determine and act for a common
goal, and,

Whereas it is my understanding the only form of government recognized as
lawful in Australia is a representative one, and,

Whereas it is my understanding representation requires mutual consent,
and,

Whereas it is my understanding that in the absence of mutual consent
neither representation nor governance can exist, and,

Whereas it is my understanding all Acts are statutes restricted in scope
and applicability by the Constitution Act, and,

(statement,arguement - quoting copyrighted Law suggests willingness to be
bound by it)

Whereas it is my understanding the Constitution Act limits it to members
and employees of government, and,

Whereas it is my understanding those who have a Tax File Number are in
fact employees of the federal government and thus are bound by the statutes
created by the federal government, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that it is lawful to abandon one’s TFN,
and,

(missing the point here, as the TFN belongs to the strawman, we don't own
it, we didn't create it, we just applied for one stupidly, thereby becoming
liable for the strawman's debt, whereas we are in fact the creditor)

Whereas it is my understanding people in Australia have a right to revoke
or deny consent to be represented and thus governed, and,

(deny is to argue and enjoin, enter the controversy)

Whereas it is my understanding if anyone does revoke or deny consent they
exist free of government control and statutory restraints, and,

(no, just the policy enforcers will think you're crazy and arrest you)

Whereas a Freeman-on-the-Land has lawfully revoked consent and does exist
free of statutory restrictions, obligations, and limitations, and,

Whereas I, _________________________________________ am a
Freeman-on-the-Land, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that acting peacefully within community
standards does not breach
the peace, and,

Whereas it is my understanding that any action for which one can apply for
and receive a license must itself be a fundamentally lawful action, and,

(applying for any licence from a government or other body or agency is
giving up your inalienable common law rights, and becoming a slave to a
fictitious legal entity and it's servants/policy enforcers)

Whereas as I am a Freeman-on-the-Land who operates with full
responsibility and not a child, I do not see the need to ask permission to
engage in lawful and peaceful activities, especially from those who claim
limited liability, and,

(operate means to put into motion or action a commercial vehicle or
machine, and stating that you do not need to ask permission is an
arguement, which is dishonour, entry and an enjoinder)

Whereas it is my understanding a by-law is defined as a rule of a
corporation, and,

Whereas it is my understanding corporations are legal fictions and require
contracts in order to claim authority or control over other parties, and,

Whereas it is my understanding legal fictions lack a soul and cannot exert
any control over those who are thus blessed and operate with respect to
that knowledge as only a fool would allow soulless fictions to dictate ones
actions, and,

(but we've all been doing this for hundreds of years, and those
corporations and governments do control us, with or without our consent,
right or wrong, lawful or not)

Whereas it is my understanding that I have a right to use my property
without having to pay for the use or enjoyment of it, and,

(what did you use to "buy" your property? - if you are talking about a car
or land, you only have equitable "title" to it, and don't own anything, the
strawman does, and you paid with the borrowed private credit of the IMF)

Whereas it is my understanding that City Rail is in fact and actuality
public property to which I have the right of use and access, and,

(Are you private or public? - public is governed by the policy enforcers
and the trans-port dept. and involves fares and rules)

Whereas I claim the right to collect a pension if I have paid into it and
claim that said right is not affected if I abandon my Tax File Number,
and,

(no, that "money" belongs to the strawman, and you're arguing again, plus
you admit to having a TFN, although you claim not to be a legal
entity...which are you?)

Whereas it is my understanding that a summons is merely an invitation to
attend and the ones issued by the Australian Securities and Investments
Commission create no obligation or dishonor if ignored, and,

(try it and see I guess...but make sure you're not home when they come
looking for your physical body to act as the surity for the absconding
strawman debtor that you've agreed to be, place a bond on you, and
warehouse you until the bond matures)

Whereas it is my understanding peace officers have a duty to distinguish
between statutes and law and those who attempt to enforce statutes against
a Freeman-on-the-Land are in fact breaking the law, and,

(No, they are agents of the system, and enforcing the policy of artificial
law, and they can do anything they like, after all it's
wonderland....resisting or arguing is dishonour, and you will be detained)

Whereas I have the power to refuse intercourse or interaction with peace
officers who have not observed me breach the peace, and,

(You have the power yes, but we don't have any peace officers here, only
en-forcers)

Whereas permanent estoppal by acquiescence barring any peace officer or
prosecutor from bringing charges against a Freeman-on-the-Land under any
Act is created if this claim is not responded to in the stated fashion and
time,

(assumption, not an agreement, this does not work unless you have a proper
agreement, and notaries only witness documents, they do not validate the
content.)

Therefore be it now known to any and all concerned and affected parties,
that I, ___________________ a Freeman-on-the-Land do hereby state clearly
specifically and unequivocally my intent to peacefully and lawfully exist
free of all statutory obligations restrictions and maintain all rights at
law to trade, exchange or barter.

(but you are still enjoined as the strawman, or have you forgotten about
your port-pass, licence, bank account, credit card, house deed, citizenship
etc?)

Furthermore, I claim that these actions are not outside my communities’
standards and will in fact support said community in our desire for truth
and maximum freedom.
Furthermore, I claim the right to engage in these actions and further
claim that all property held by me is held under a claim of right as
mentioned in the CRIMINAL CODE - SECT 22.
(why are you claiming rights under a fictitious code/law/entity and
quoting copyrighted material when you're supposed to be a freeman?)

Furthermore, I claim that anyone who interferes with my lawful activities
after having been served notice of this claim and who fails to properly
dispute or make lawful counterclaim is breaking the law, cannot claim good
faith or color of right and that such transgressions will be dealt with in
a properly convened court de jure.

(If you go to court, you are making a claim, enjoining, arguing, entering
into the legal/public domain and agreeing to give up your rights and be
judged)

Furthermore, I claim that the courts in New South Wales Australia are
de-facto and bound by the Law and Equity Act and are in fact in the
profitable business of conducting, witnessing and facilitating the
transactions of security interests and I further claim they require the
consent of both parties prior to providing any such services.

(statement/arguement/claim - dishonour, plus anyone doing business is
likely a "sole trader" which by definition is a member organisation of a
securities exchange)

Furthermore, I claim all transactions of security interests require the
consent of both parties and I do hereby deny consent to any transaction of
a security interest issuing under any Act for as herein stated as a
Freeman-on-the-Land I am not subject to any Act.
(yes you are, you just don't know it)

Furthermore, I claim my FEE SCHEDULE for any transgressions by peace
officers, government principals or agents or justice system participants is
TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS PER HOUR or portion thereof if being questioned,
interrogated or in any way detained, harassed or otherwise regulated and
TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS PER HOUR or portion thereof if I am handcuffed,
transported, incarcerated or subjected to any adjudication process without
my express written and Notarised consent.
(Is this an offer? Are you consenting to these actions by telling them
your going rates? - who would you send the bill to, and what would they pay
you in? Gold and Silver are the only things of value in the real world, the
dollar is a fiction, a unit of measure, i.e "a dollar of what, a pound of
what)

Furthermore, I claim the right to use a Notary Public to secure payment of
the aforementioned FEE SCHEDULE against any transgressors who by their
actions or omissions harm me or my interests, directly or by proxy in any
way.
(Notaries don't do that, they witness documents, and (rarely) do protests,
but they are getting harder to find, most won't witness these kinds of
silly arguement documents, as they have the right to choose to witness or
not, it's not obligatory)

Furthermore, I claim the right to convene a proper court de jure in order
to address any potentially criminal actions of any peace officers,
government principals or agents or justice system participants who having
been served notice of this claim fail to dispute or discuss or make lawful
counterclaim and then interfere by act or omission with the lawful exercise
of properly claimed and established rights and freedoms.
(means nothing unless you have proper consent, notary protest letters
etc)

Furthermore, I claim the law of agent and principal applies and that
service upon one is service upon both.

Furthermore, I claim the right to deal with any counterclaims or disputes
publicly and in an open forum using discussion and negotiation and to
capture on video tape said discussion and negotiation for whatever lawful
purpose as I see fit.

(still happy to enter the controversy I see)

Affected parties wishing to dispute the claims made herein or make their
own counterclaims must respond appropriately within TEN (10) days of
service of notice of this action. Responses must be under Oath or
attestation, upon full commercial liability and penalty of perjury and
registered in the Notary Office herein provided no later than ten days from
the date of original service as attested to by way of certificate of
service.

(commercial time is 72 hours, time to respond is usually 7-10 days, but I
believe 21 days in the allocation for notary protest. You'd also need to
have it sent certified post, reply receipt)

Failure to register a dispute against the claims made herein will result
in an automatic default judgment and permanent and irrevocable estoppal by
acquiescence barring the bringing of charges under any statute or Act
against My Self Freeman-on-the-Land ______________________________

(I doubt it...but please go ahead if you think so, but expect to be
harassed anyway)

Place of claim of right: New South Wales, Australia

Dated: __________________________________

Claimant: ________________________________

Notary Public: ____________________________

Use of a Notary is for attestation and verification purposes only and does
not constitute a change in status or entrance or acceptance of foreign
jurisdiction.

(The Notary decides if he will agree to include this statement, he may ask
for it to be removed, plus they have other wording that needs to go on
here. This document amounts to nothing more than a waste of time, nice try
but no cigar)