Love for Life

Media Terrorists Explode Bomb in Australia
Manufacturing a convincing media “blueprint” for future western bombing atrocities

Copyright Joe Vialls, 29 August 2003

Media Terrorists Explode Bomb in Australia - Manufacturing a convincing media “blueprint” for future western bombing atrocities
Media Terrorists Explode Bomb in Australia

On Monday August 25, the Australian ABC ran part of a documentary called Security Risk 101, which claimed to show “amateur” media terrorists manufacturing and detonating a powerful bomb, allegedly constructed solely from materials purchased over-the-counter from hardware stores on the Australian island of Tasmania, home of the notorious 'Port Arthur Mssacre'. Heavy emphasis was placed on ammonium nitrate fertilizer, which the program glibly and inaccurately claimed was, “the same explosive used in Oklahoma City, Bali, and the Jakarta Marriott Hotel”.

The entire program was comprised of a series of illusions about bombs and terrorists, designed among other things to convince the public that ammonium nitrate fertilizer is an explosive, which it is not. Although the ABC program was directed primarily at an unwitting Australian audience, the startling artistic illusions it created are of equal importance to American, British, and other western citizens.

As you can see in the photographs above, a “car bomb” allegedly constructed from high density ammonium nitrate fertilizer, was detonated at New Norfolk on the Australian island of Tasmania, where it apparently made a crater about four feet deep by fifteen feet in diameter. This illusory crater is of huge benefit to the Australian Federal Government, which is still belatedly trying to make the Australian public believe that the massive crater from the “terrorist bomb” in Bali, which killed 250 people, was caused by a similar “car bomb” standing on the street outside the Sari Night Club in Kuta Beach. Exactly how the illusory crater in Tasmania was formed, will be explained later in this report.

The second deliberate illusion lay in convincing television viewers nationwide that the 440-pound bomb was constructed using knowledge gleaned from a mere 15 minute session on the Internet. In the words of one of the media terrorists involved in the construction of the bomb, “It is really simple to make, and anyone can just go out and buy the materials from hardware stores” … “The Internet taught me everything I needed to know in fifteen minutes.”

The whole program was dangerous rubbish, designed to make you believe that earlier bombs in Bali and Jakarta really were the work of unskilled religious fanatics, rather than devastating professional decoy weapons positioned and detonated by the CIA and Mossad. It was also designed to blind you in advance to future atrocities carried out by the latter agencies, in their insane quest to drive Judeo-Christian hatred against Muslims of all nations. In this manner, you will hopefully be forced to support the failing homegrown “War on Terror”.

Media terrorists mix their ammonium nitrate “witches brew” in Tasmania without a license. During 1996 in New York, blind Egyptian cleric Sheik Omar Abdel-Rahman was sentenced to life imprisonment without parole for exactly the same offence.

So, when a building near you in Los Angeles or London or Sydney is blasted out of existence by a massive “car bomb”, which then magically leaves a large impossible crater, you will be asked to believe that this is the deadly work of crazed amateur “Muslim Terrorists”. An entirely spurious claim of course, but one that will no doubt be reinforced by copious video clips from the ABC’s Tasmanian bombing illusion, which is now on file and instantly at the ready to “prove” the “power” of these impossible amateur weapons.

The need for the Tasmanian media illusion was generated by too many ordinary people out there with far too much intelligence, most of them sharing a dogged determination to expose the phony “War on Terror” for what it really is – a blatant western grab for Middle East oil reserves, currently and very inconveniently owned by a number of different Muslim nations.

Because of widespread public disbelief, Bush, Blair and Howard are currently fighting a rearguard action in their homemade “War on Terror”, and are desperate to keep you afraid, very afraid, of their chosen Muslim targets. It is you the western public who are essentially being terrorized by your own politicians, and if they feel obliged to increase your level of personal terror by bombing more western civilians in Milwaukee, Manchester or Melbourne, rest assured they will do so without batting an eyelid.

To fully comprehend how the corporate media is misleading you, and to neutralize any such calculated disinformation in the future, it is time to look at exactly what ammonium nitrate fertilizer really is, what it can do, and far more significantly, what it cannot do. Most important of all is to remember that ammonium nitrate is not an explosive substance in its own right, and is completely incapable of becoming a high-explosive substance, no matter how it is modified.

This news will come as an enormous relief to thousands of Australian Moms and Dads who have been frantically calling emergency services ever since the ABC program was aired, begging for bomb disposal experts to come and remove old 10 pound bags of ammonium nitrate fertilizer from their garden sheds. Relax, Moms and Dads, relax! This sudden move by the crazed Australian Government to take your fingerprints, and add you and your children’s names to their list of potential terrorists, means nothing at all. Your ammonium nitrate fertilizer is still the same friendly compound it always was, and completely incapable of blowing up your garden shed.

In order to make their “ammonium nitrate” bomb explode at all, the media terrorists in Tasmania had to illegally obtain certain other highly-regulated products they did not tell you about, and indulge in at least two procedures which violate the Dangerous Goods Act. Unless these other steps are taken and the highly-regulated products incorporated, there will be no bang at all. For example, when used in mining, low-density ammonium nitrate is used as a cheap method of “enhancing” an explosion by releasing oxygen, but is not itself an explosive agent.

The IRA and other similar organizations use ammonium nitrate in their larger bombs, for exactly the same reason. So we will now construct a nominal 440-pound “ammonium nitrate” bomb that actually works, and you in turn will see the impossibility of the artful lies peddled by the Australian ABC.

First we will purchase twenty-six pounds weight of diesel oil [about four gallons], and very carefully coat 404 pounds of low density mining grade ammonium nitrate pellets with it. Please note at this stage that high-density ammonium nitrate fertilizer is no good for this exercise, because it lacks the required purity. Yes the high-density ammonium nitrate fertilizer will release some oxygen, but certainly not enough for the devastating media bomb shown exploding at the top of this page.

You will notice at this stage that the diesel fuel has turned the ammonium nitrate pellets a blue green color, which is certainly not the case with the Australian media-terrorist “witch’s brew” shown being poured in the pictures below. This is an entirely critical omission, because the diesel fuel is the only low-explosive component of the bomb.

Australia media terrorists illegally manufacturing their “homemade” bomb

Though it will come as a great surprise to many readers, the only explosive compound in the Ammonium Nitrate Fuel Oil [ANFO] slurry, is the diesel fuel alone, which explodes every day of every week in the cylinders of every diesel engine on the face of the earth, but manages to do so only under extreme compression, which is simply pressure measurable in pounds per square inch. Now then, if we then added pure oxygen to the air intake of one of these diesel engines, the magnified explosions inside the cylinders would be so great that the engine cylinder head would be blown right off.

So this is the only role that ammonium nitrate plays in a bomb, i.e. it provides a source of oxygen to enhance the “bang” made by the diesel when it explodes. There are a hundred or more other compounds out there that will provide a source of oxygen, including simple rust [iron oxide], but the media terrorists conveniently forgot to tell you about them. As an aside, there is absolutely no point in “licensing” the sale of ammonium nitrate in Australia when there are so many interesting and easy alternatives.

Fine so far. We now have about 430 pounds of ANFO slurry, which must be tightly contained if we are to have even a remote chance of detonating it. If the ANFO slurry it is not tightly contained in drums, or perhaps in an underground cavity, the resulting reaction will be a fire rather than an explosion due to a lack of compression, and in turn a lack of pressure.

Now we come to the really tricky bit. In order to produce the massive pressure needed to initiate the Ammonium Nitrate Fuel Oil low-explosive, we must have a high-explosive primer positioned at the top of the slurry, or in the middle. Because 430 pounds of ANFO is a very large charge to detonate efficiently, we will use exact military procedures, as follows.

From the official manuals we know that one pound of TNT or equivalent high-explosive is needed to initiate every 50 pounds of ANFO slurry, meaning that for our 430 pound ANFO bomb we will have to incorporate a total of 10 pounds of military grade TNT. Because we must ensure that the pressure is uniform throughout the bomb, we will split the TNT into two separate 5 pound primers, placing one at the top and the other in the center of the ANFO slurry, connected together by detonator cord.

The Tasmanian media terrorists did exactly the same thing, but with one important difference. The media are not military personnel, and they are not licensed to obtain TNT or any other high explosive, all of which are strictly regulated in Australia. It is possible to home-manufacture high explosive, but the complex processes involved are extremely dangerous, and take elite special forces units several weeks to learn. Thus when one of the media terrorists said “The Internet taught me everything I needed to know in fifteen minutes”, he was lying. Perhaps the counter-terrorism unit of the Australian Federal Police should investigate exactly where the media managed to obtain ten pounds of TNT high explosive?

Even now with our home-made bomb constructed under direct military guidance and authority, we still need to make our bomb go “bang” by remote control, which is no easy trick. To do this we need a powerful detonator, which fires the high-explosive, which in turn generates the extreme pressure needed to fire the diesel oil in the ANFO slurry. Oh dear, just like TNT and other high-explosives, detonators are also strictly regulated in Australia, and the media cannot buy one without a license. Then there is a remote radio detonator, which also requires a license the media does not have.

Next we come to the impressive crater, designed to make you all believe that the massive explosions in Bali and at the Jakarta Marriott Hotel were “car bombs”. No, they were not, and the footage filmed by the media terrorists in Tasmania does not show what it purports to show, i.e. a distant aging sedan “car bomb” exploding all over the landscape, leaving a four-foot deep crater in it the field.

What you were NOT shown by the ABC, was the part of the process where the large media terrorist bomb was placed in a four-foot-deep hole, which was then back-filled before the old Datsun sedan was towed into place directly overhead the underground bomb, where it acted as a crude blast “reflector”. So when the bomb was detonated by remote control, the underground shock wave took the line of least resistance as usual, blowing a conical chunk of topsoil out of the ground, and hurling remnants of the shattered Datsun over the nearby trees

You do not need to take my word for this. In a written transcript of events, the ABC anchor lady in Tasmania, Judy Tierney, said the bomb, “was detonated out the back of New Norfolk (in June)” …."They put it in the earth underneath a car and the car shattered into tiny pieces. They did it in the public interest. The main purpose of their story was to say, 'Look, this is how easy this fertiliser is to get, surely there should be some restrictions on it'."

Judging by the diameter of the crater, about eight tons of topsoil were displaced, which indicates strongly that the high-explosive primer component of this weapon probably weighed considerably more than ten pounds, but that is a matter for counter terrorist officials to determine by close forensic examination, if they dare to do any such thing, which seems unlikely because there are a number of political advantages attached to this arcane demonstration.

Though the Federal Government protested after the demonstration, in my view it protested too much, and did far too little about the media terrorists involved. It is a fact that this “demonstration” bomb served to deceitfully reinforce its stand that both of the massive Bali and Jakarta blasts were caused by “car bombs”, despite the huge craters present at both sites.

Government intent to “regulate” ammonium nitrate serves the same covert objective, in that most members of the public will then be forced to believe that ammonium nitrate is a “dangerous explosive”. If it were not a dangerous explosive, then why on earth would government regulate it?

Lastly there is political fear, which is becoming so rank in Australia that you can smell the sweat 2,000 miles away from Canberra. Politicians in Washington, London and Canberra are now violating the wishes of the people to such a degree that they fear a public backlash, especially one initiated by members of the military. Political logic therefore dictates that if you remove all potential weapons, the peasants will be unable to rise up against you, or at least will be significantly impaired in their ability to do so.

Anyone with knowledge of asymmetric special operations knows this is complete rubbish. There are more than a hundred different methods that can be used to cause very large explosions, without the need to access regulated high explosives and detonators, and without the need to access ammonium nitrate or any other fertilizer. A number of these methods can generate blasts big enough to drop entire six-floor apartment blocks, and will no doubt be used for this and other purposes if the politicians continue to unlawfully push their luck too far.

Link to this article: http://www.vialls.com/transpositions/bomb.html