Anti-Semitism. Don't Settle For Imitations by William Blum - The Anti-Empire Report

Anti-Semitism. Don't settle for imitations.
William Blum
The Anti-Empire Report

"The cleanliness of this people, moral and otherwise, I must say, is a
point in itself. By their very exterior you could tell that these were
no lovers of water, and, to your distress, you often knew it with your
eyes closed. ... Added to this, there was their unclean dress and
their generally unheroic appearance. ... Was there any form of filth
or profligacy, particularly in cultural life, without at least one Jew
involved in it? ... nine tenths of all literary filth, artistic trash,
and theatrical idiocy can be set to the account of a people ... a
people under whose parasitism the whole of honest humanity is
suffering, today more than ever: the Jews." -Now who can be the author
of such abominable anti-semitism?

a)Hasan Nasrallah, leader of Hezbollah in Lebanon;
b)John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt, authors of "The Israel Lobby and
U.S. Foreign Policy"; c)Osama bin Laden; d)Jimmy Carter; e)Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad, President of Iran; f)Norman Finkelstein, author of "The
Holocaust Industry".

Each one has been condemned as anti-Semitic. Are you having a problem
deciding?
Oh, excuse me, I forgot one -- g)Adolf Hitler.[1] Does that make it
easier? I'll bet some of you were thinking it must have been Ahmadinejad.

The Webster's Dictionary defines "anti-Semite" as "One who
discriminates against or is hostile to or prejudiced against Jews."
Notice that Israel is not mentioned.

The next time a critic of Israeli policies is labeled "anti-semitic"
think of this definition, think of Adolf's charming way of putting it,
then closely examine what the accused has actually said or written.

It may, however, be past the time for such a rational, intellectual
pursuit; ultra-heated polarization reigns supreme with anything
concerning the Middle East, particularly Israel.

In March, at a conference of the American Israel Public Affairs
Committee (AIPAC) in Washington, one of the speakers, an American
"Christian Zionist", asserted: "It is 1938, Iran is Germany and
Ahmadinejad is the new Hitler." The audience responded with a standing
ovation, one of seven for his talk.[2]

Then, in May, former Israeli Prime-Minister and current Likud leader
Benjamin Netanyahu declared that "It's 1938 and Iran is Germany. And
Iran is racing to arm itself with atomic bombs. ... [While
Ahmadinejad] denies the Holocaust he is preparing another Holocaust
for the Jewish state."[3]

Not to be outdone in semi-hysterical propaganda, Israel's president,
Shimon Peres, has compared an Iranian nuclear bomb to a "flying
concentration camp".[4]

So why hasn't Iran at least started its holocaust by killing or
throwing into concentration camps its own Jews, an estimated 30,000 in
number? These are Iranian Jews who have representation in Parliament
and who have been free for many years to emigrate to Israel but have
chosen not to do so.

For your further apocalyptic enjoyment here are a couple more of
Zionism's finest envoys speaking about Iran. Former Speaker of the
House in the US Congress, Newt Gingrich: "Three nuclear weapons is a
second Holocaust. We have enemies who are quite explicit in their
desire to destroy us. They say it publicly, on television, on Web
sites. [They are] fully as determined as Nazi Germany, more determined
than the Soviet Union, and these enemies will kill us the first chance
they get."[5]

And Norman Podhoretz, leading neo-conservative editor of Commentary
magazine, in an article entitled "The Case for Bombing Iran": "Like
Hitler, [Ahmadinejad] is a revolutionary whose objective is to
overturn the going international system and to replace it in the
fullness of time with a new order dominated by Iran and ruled by the
religio-political culture of Islamofascism. ... The plain and brutal
truth is that if Iran is to be prevented from developing a nuclear
arsenal, there is no alternative to the actual use of military force
-- any more than there was an alternative to force if Hitler was to be
stopped in 1938."[6]

Though so often condemned, Hitler actually arrived at a number of very
perceptive insights into how the world worked. One of them was this:
"The great masses of the people in the very bottom of their hearts
tend to be corrupted rather than consciously and purposely evil ...
therefore, in view of the primitive simplicity of their minds, they
more easily fall a victim to a big lie than to a little one, since
they themselves lie in little things, but would be ashamed of lies
that were too big."[7]

Ahmadinejad arrived in New York September 24 to address the United
Nations. At Columbia University he was introduced by the school's
president as a man who appeared to lack "intellectual courage", had a
"fanatical mindset", and may be "astonishingly undereducated".[8] How
many people in the audience, I wonder, looked around to see where
George W. was sitting.

"If I were the president of a university, I would not have invited
him. He's a holocaust denier," said Hillary Clinton, once again
fearlessly challenging the Bush administration's propaganda.[9]

The above is but a small sample of the hatred and anger spewed forth
against Ahmadinejad for several years now. A number of people on the
American left, who should know better, have joined this chorus. I
therefore would like to repeat, and update, part of something I wrote
in this report last December, which was entitled "Designer Monsters".

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is a man seemingly custom-made for the White House
in its endless quest for enemies with whom to scare Congress, the
American people, and the world, in order to justify the unseemly
behavior of the empire. The Iranian president, we are told, has
declared that he wants to "wipe Israel off the map". He has said that
"the Holocaust is a myth". He held a conference in Iran for "Holocaust
deniers". And his government passed a new law requiring Jews to wear a
yellow insignia, à la the Nazis. On top of all that, he's aiming to
build nuclear bombs, one of which would surely be aimed at Israel.
What right-thinking person would not be scared by such a man?

However, like with all such designer monsters made bigger than life
during the Cold War and since by Washington, the truth about
Ahmadinejad is a bit more complicated. According to people who know
Farsi, the Iranian leader has never said anything about "wiping Israel
off the map". In his October 29, 2005 speech, when he reportedly first
made the remark, the word "map" does not even appear. According to the
translation of Juan Cole, American professor of Modern Middle East and
South Asian History, Ahmadinejad said that "the regime occupying
Jerusalem must vanish from the page of time." His remark, said Cole,
"does not imply military action or killing anyone at all"[10], which
of course is what would make the remark sound threatening.

At the December 2006 conference in Teheran ("Review of the Holocaust:
Global Vision"), the Iranian president said: "The Zionist regime will
be wiped out soon, the same way the Soviet Union was, and humanity
will achieve freedom."[11] Obviously, the man is not calling for any
kind of violent attack upon Israel, for the dissolution of the Soviet
Union took place peacefully.

Moreover, in June 2006, subsequent to Ahmadinejad's controversial
speech, Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, stated: "We
have no problem with the world. We are not a threat whatsoever to the
world, and the world knows it. We will never start a war. We have no
intention of going to war with any state."[12]

As for the Holocaust myth, I have yet to read or hear words from
Ahmadinejad saying simply, clearly, unambiguously, and unequivocally
that he thinks that what we know as the Holocaust never happened. He
has instead commented about the peculiarity and injustice of a
Holocaust which took place in Europe resulting in a state for the Jews
in the Middle East instead of in Europe. Why are the Palestinians
paying a price for a German crime? he asks. He argues that Israel and
the United States have exploited the memory of the Holocaust for their
own purposes. And he wonders about the accuracy of the number of Jews
-- six million -- allegedly killed in the Holocaust, as have many
other people of all political stripes, including Holocaust survivors
like Italian author Primo Levi. (The much publicized World War One
atrocities which turned out to be false made the public very skeptical
of the Holocaust claims for a long time after World War Two.)
Ahmadinejad further asks why European researchers have been imprisoned
for questioning certain details about the Holocaust.
Which of this deserves to be labeled "Holocaust denial"?

The conference gave a platform to various points of view, including
six members of Jews United Against Zionism, at least two of whom were
rabbis. One was Ahron Cohen, from London, who declared: "There is no
doubt whatsoever, that during World War 2 there developed a terrible
and catastrophic policy and action of genocide perpetrated by Nazi
Germany against the Jewish People." He also said that "the Zionists
make a great issue of the Holocaust in order to further their
illegitimate philosophy and aims," indicating as well that the figure
of six million Jewish victims is debatable. The other rabbi was Moshe
David Weiss, who told the delegates: "We don't want to deny the
killing of Jews in World War II, but Zionists have given much higher
figures for how many people were killed. They have used the Holocaust
as a device to justify their oppression." His group rejects the
creation of Israel on the grounds that it violates Jewish religious
law in that a Jewish state can't exist until the return of the Messiah
.[13]

Another speaker was Shiraz Dossa, professor of political science at
St. Francis Xavier University in Canada. In an interview after the
conference, he described himself as an anti-imperialist and an admirer
of Noam Chomsky, and said that he "was invited because of my expertise
as a scholar in the German-Jewish area, as well as my studies in the
Holocaust. ... I have nothing to do with Holocaust denial, not at
all." His talk, he said, was "about the war on terrorism, and how the
Holocaust plays into it. ... There was no pressure at all to say
anything, and people there had different views."[14]

Clearly, the conference -- which the White House called "an affront to
the entire civilized world"[15] -- was not set up to be a forum for
people to deny that the Holocaust literally never took place at all.

As to the yellow star story of May 2006 -- that was a complete
fabrication by a prominent Iranian-American neo-conservative author,
Amir Taheri.

Ahmadinejad, however, is partly to blame for his predicament. When
asked directly about the Holocaust and other controversial matters he
usually declines to give explicit answers of "yes" or "no". I
interpret this as his prideful refusal to accede to the wishes of what
he regards as a hostile Western interviewer asking hostile questions.
The Iranian president is also in the habit of prefacing certain
remarks with "Even if the Holocaust happened ... ", a rhetorical
device we all use in argument and discussion, but one which can not
help but reinforce the doubts people have about his views. However,
when Ahmadinejad himself asks, as he often has, "Why should the
Palestinians have to pay for something that happened in Europe?" he
does not get a clear answer.

In any event, in the question and answer session following his talk at
Columbia, the Iranian president said: "I'm not saying that it [the
Holocaust] didn't happen at all. This is not the judgment that I'm
passing here."

That should put the matter to rest. But of course it won't. Two days
later, September 26, a bill (H. R. 3675) was introduced in Congress
"To prohibit Federal grants to or contracts with Columbia University",
to punish the school for inviting Ahmadinejad to speak. The bill's
first "finding" states that "Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has
called for the destruction of the State of Israel, a critical ally of
the United States."

That same day, comedian Jay Leno had great fun ridiculing Ahmadinejad
for denying that the Holocaust ever happened "despite all the
eye-witness accounts".

How long before the first linking of Iran with 9-11? Or has that
already happened? How long before democracy and freedom bombs begin to
fall upon the heads of the Iranian people? All the charges of
anti-Semitism and Holocaust denial, along with other disinformation,
are of course designed to culminate in this new crime against humanity.

I wonder, in discussing these matters, if I'm running the risk of once
again being called "anti-Semitic" by some Internet readers. No one is
safe from such charges these days. It should be noted that Hugo
Chavez, president of Venezuela, was accused last year of anti-semitic
behavior by the Jewish Telegraphic Agency of New York and the Simon
Wiesenthal Center in Los Angeles, important members of the Israel
lobby. The accusation was based on a highly egregious out-of-context
reading of some remarks by Chavez.[16] One doesn't have to be
particularly conspiracy minded to think that this was done in
collusion with Bush administration officials. As the Reagan
administration in 1983 flung charges of anti-Semitism against the
Sandinista government of Nicaragua, led by Daniel Ortega, who heads it
again today.[17] Stay tuned. Daniel, watch out.

One final thought. On the Democratic Party's failure to stand up to
the Bush fascist tide. Here, from the first-person account of a German
living under Hitler in the 1930s, his observation about the leading
German political party, the Social Democrats, the Democratic Party of
its time: The Social Democrats, he wrote, "had fought the election
campaign of 1933 in a dreadfully humiliating way, chasing after the
Nazi slogans and emphasizing that they were 'also nationalist'. ... In
May, a month before they were finally dissolved, the Social Democratic
faction in the Reichstag had unanimously expressed their confidence in
Hitler and joined in the singing of the 'Horst Wessel Song,' the Nazi
anthem. (The official parliamentary report noted: 'Unending applause
and cheers, in the house and the galleries. The Reichschancellor
[Hitler] turns to the Social Democratic faction and applauds.')"[18]

¤ ¤ ¤ ¤ ¤

NOTES

[1] Adolf Hitler, "Mein Kampf" (Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston, 1971,
original version 1925), Vol. 1, chapter 2, pp 57-8; chapter 4, p.150

[2] The Forward (Jewish newspaper in New York), March 16, 2007
http://www.forward.com/articles/pastor-hailed-bibi-dissed-pollard-reject...

[3] Haaretz.com (Israeli newspaper),
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/787766.html

[4] Ibid.

[5] The Jerusalem Post, January 23, 2007

[6] Commentary Magazine (New York), June 2007

[7] "Mein Kampf", op. cit., Vol. 1, chapter 10, p.231

[8] Washington Post, September 25, 2007, p.1

[9] Washington Post, September 25, 2007, p.6

[10] Informed Comment, Cole's blog, May 3, 2006
www.juancole.com/2006/05/hitchens-hacker-and-hitchens.html
For a word-by-word breakdown of Ahmadinejad's remark, in Farsi and
English, see: Global Research, January 20, 2007,
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=NOR20070...

[11] Associated Press, December 12, 2006

[12] Letter to Washington Post from M.A. Mohammadi, Press Officer,
Iranian Mission to the United Nations, June 12, 2006

[13] nkusa.org/activities/Speeches/2006Iran-ACohen.cfm;
Telegraph.co.uk, article by Alex Spillius, December 13, 2006;
Associated Press, December 12, 2006

[14] Globe and Mail (Toronto), December 13, 2006

[15] Associated Press, December 12, 2006

[16] Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting, www.fair.org/index.php?page=2805

[17] Holly Sklar, "Washington's War On Nicaragua" (1988), p.243

[18] Sebastian Haffner, "Defying Hitler" (English edition, New York,
2000), pp.130-1

*********************************************************************

WORLD VIEW NEWS SERVICE

To subscribe to this group, send an email to:
wvns-subscribe @ yahoogroups.com

NEWS ARCHIVE IS OPEN TO PUBLIC VIEW
http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/wvns/

Need some good karma? Appreciate the service?
Please consider donating to WVNS today.
Email ummyakoub @ yahoo.com for instructions.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Link to this website: http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org

Support the Love for Life Campaign and the Cristian Family

Pay with Paymate Express
Not for Commercial Transactions.
Gifts only.
Paymate accepts Mastercard and Visa.

Bank:
Account name:
BSB:
Account number:
SWIFT BIC Code:
Australia New Zealand Banking Group (ANZ)
Fiona Caroline Cristian
012 547
5576 81376
ANZBAU3M

DISCLAIMER

Note: Updated Wednesday 17th June 2009 8.00pm Sydney Time. Love For Life does not support harm doing in any shape or form. However, we are supporters of free speech and post articles, documentaries, etc, that represent a wide cross section of ideas. See the Love For Life extensive research library where over 6000 documents, articles and videos are posted: http://loveforlife.com.au/issues. We clearly see the evidence of the destruction to MAN and the earth that has been caused by ALL religions over the centuries and are therefore not supporters of religions, cults, sects or any group that demands conformity of thought, speech or action, or has rules, regulations or rituals that must be followed. Religions, nationalities and cultural "identities" are formed as a result of the brainwashing we receive from childhood. They are part of the tactics the Establishment uses to keep us all divided from one another and fighting one another.

All religions promote discrimination and division, leading to hatred and even violence and murder. None of them have yet to produce a remedy to all the suffering, poverty, unhappiness and discrimination in the world. If any religion truly had the remedy to all the suffering on earth, there would no longer be any suffering. What have Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, Judaism, atheism and the New Age done to end the suffering in the world?

The Love For Life website has information from all sides on many subjects, whether about Islam, Judaism, Christianity, Law, health, psychology, mind control, vaccination, aspartame, MSG, Chemtrails etc. There are over 6000 articles, documentaries etc on the website and they are so diverse that we are sure that everyone would be able to find something they loved and something they hated, if they took the time to search. If we removed all the articles hated by everyone, there would probably be nothing left! We are not anti anyone but freedom of speech is freedom of speech and no one should condemn the work of another without taking the time to research the subject themselves. Yes, there are articles by those who have a less-than-rosy-viewpoint of Judaism, but there are also articles on the dark side of Tibetan Buddhism (and it is very dark) for those who are interested in the truth: Tibet - Buddhism - Dalai Lama: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6271 Should the authors of these articles be abused and imprisoned for daring to challenge the widely conceived reputation of Buddhism as being the religion of peace and love and that of the Dalai Lama as a saint, or should those interested be allowed to study the work and come to their own conclusions? The same applies to all the articles, documentaries, etc, about Christianity, Islam, Freemasonry, New World Order, etc.

The Love for Life website also shows how the Rule of Law, the Bar, the Government, the Monarchy, the system of commerce, the local, national and multi/trans-national private corporations, all the courses and careers on offer from our universities, all the educators, scientists, academics and experts, the aristocrats and the Establishment bloodlines have also done NOTHING to end the suffering in the world. The website maps the insanity of a world where there is no help for those in need, just as there was no help available for us when we were victims of terrible bank fraud: http://loveforlife.com.au/court_case (orchestrated, condoned and protected by an international crime syndicate/terrorist organisation of judges, barristers, registrars, lawyers, politicians, banksters, big business representatives, media moguls and other lackeys who, all together, put up a wall of silence despite our trying many, many avenues. After the family home was stolen and business destroyed we were left close to poverty and destitution caring for 4 young daughters. Three years later not much has changed regardless of all our efforts. Where were all the followers of all the religions to help us? Or do we have to be members of those religions to receive help from others involved in them?

We have been accused of being anti - Jewish because we had posted an excerpt from James von Brun's book: Kill the Best Gentiles! http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6054 in which he blames Jews for the problems of the world. Obviously this is not our view because of what we have stated above. We do not hate anyone, whatever religion they follow. We are always open to talk to any religious leader or politician and meet with any judge, member of the Bar, experts, academics, educators etc to share the remedy we offer that heals all the divisions between MAN and MAN, and MAN and the EARTH.

Today, a representative of the New South Wales Jewish Board of Deputies is threatening to close the website down, because they have decided it is anti - Jewish and that we promote racism. What has the New South Wales Jewish Board of Deputies done to end the suffering in the world? Can they show that they are concerned with the suffering of ALL men, women and children AND ARE SEEN TO BE DOING SOMETHING ABOUT IT or are they only concerned with Jewish affairs? If so, they, along with all the other religions that only care for their own, are part of the problem, not part of the solution. The man who rang Arthur today was only concerned with Jewish affairs; he was not interested in our intentions or in anybody else, just as most Christians, Muslims, Sikhs, Catholics, etc, are only interested in their own. While we separate ourselves into groups, dividing ourselves from others with rules, regulations, rituals, procedures and conditions, we will never solve our problems.

No matter what we in the Western World Civilisation of Commerce have been promised by our politicians, religious leaders, scientists, educators, philosophers, etc, for the past two hundred years, all we have seen is ever-increasing destruction of men, women and children and the earth. None of the so-called experts and leaders we have been taught to rely on are coming up with a solution and none of them are taking full-responsibility for the fact that they can't handle the problem. All religious books talk about end times full of destruction and suffering but why do we have to follow this program when there is an alternative to hatred, mayhem and death? Why are our leaders following the program of destruction and death rather than exploring the alternatives? It seems that any mainstream politician, priest or academic are only interested in supporting the RULES OF THE DIVIDE, that maintain the haves and the have nots. For 200+ years, 99% of the world population have been so trained to pass on their responsibility for themselves, others and the earth, that the 1% of the population that make up the leaders of the rest of us are making all the decisions leading to the destruction of all of us and the earth. Let's not forget the education system that brainwashes the 99% of the population that we are free and have equal rights while, in fact, we are feathering the nests of those at the top.

At the root of all our problems is self-centredness, an unwillingness nurtured by the Establishment that keeps us concerned only with our own needs rather than the needs of others around us and the Earth. Instead of creating and releasing acts of love for those around us as gifts to benefit them and the earth, we take, take and take, until there is nothing left. The whole point of the Love for Life website is to show people the root of all our problems and to share the remedy. The extensive research library is there to attract browsers and to provide access to information not available through mainstream channels. If the New South Wales Jewish Board of Deputies can, after careful examination of our work, prove that anything we are saying is wrong, we will be happy to accept their proof. If they cannot, and they are still insistent on closing the website down, they will be showing themselves to be traitors to MAN because they are not interested in pursuing any avenue that can end the suffering in the world.

All religions, corporations and organisations that support and maintain the Western World Civilisation of Commerce are part of the problem because our civilisation is a world of haves and have nots, racism, violence, hatred, poverty, sickness, discrimination, abuse, starvation, homelessness, corruption, collusion, vindictiveness, social unrest, arrogance, ignorance, fear, war and chaos. While we support civilisation, we support death and destruction because ALL civilisations that have ever existed are apocalyptic by design.

If we truly want peace on earth and freedom for all, we have to let go of all that which keeps us divided, and come together as MAN, conscious living co-creators of creation. The Love For Life website offers a remedy to the problems we all face in the form of DO NO HARM COMMUNITIES: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/3641 For more details see here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6511 and here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/3385 - We also highly recommend that everyone read the brilliant Russian books called The Ringing Cedars: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/1125 - The Love For Life homepage/front-page also provides lots of inspiring remedy based information: http://loveforlife.com.au - If you want to be kept up to date with our work please register to the Love For Life mailing list here: http://loveforlife.com.au/campaign_list We usually send two postings per month. Presently there are over 5000 registrations reaching over 200,000 readers globally. The website now receives over 2 million strikes per month with June 2009 heading close to (or over) 3 million strikes.

Conscious Love Always
Arthur and Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
17th June 2009