Love for Life

Printer-friendly versionSend to friend

NSW Land Titles Office in Sydney - I Printed "Certificate of Title" To My Home And It Described Me As The "Tenant"

Email Correspondence With Arthur Cristian, John Wilson, Jack Shaw and Others

-------------------------------

11th December 2007

From Arthur Cristian

Hi John and Jack
Then comes the issue as to why are the people paying for mortgages and exorbitant interest rates, often paying for the price of owning 2 to 3 houses to own one, in the belief they will own a home/land outright 100%, when in truth they are not able to own the home/land and are just tenants?

What will a judge say to this and what will the banks and the governments position be, when you consider that tens of millions of citizens are working very long hours, many doing more than one job, often working 20 to 30 years in the belief they are paying off a mortgage to own a home/land = FREEDOM ....... FOR WHAT?

Just to be tenants?

Is this what we call a Hu-Mans price for being a serf?

If supposed "outright" land owners (no mortgage-loans encumbering their land) are really "ONLY" tenants, then all home buyers-borrowers-mortgagees etc are paying exorbitant rents, much much higher than those who are just renters.

What about inheritance?

What are our children inheriting from us?

And what are parents breaking their backs and stressing out all those years for?

Then you add all the taxes we pay (see: http://www.loveforlife.com.au/node/2268) and you can see very very clearly "incontrovertibly" that the people are in fact "SLAVES" (hu-mans) of the Establishment.

If the hu-mans can't be woken up by this unarguable ("Certificate of Title" as Tenant) evidence, then gees we are all in deep shit and we will all have to work very very hard to get out of it.

The hard-copy-solid gold evidence is already there revealing that the state of Queensland is a Private Corporation that owns all the land and the people who believe they own their home/land in Queensland have only pieces of paper to show for it. See these documents filed in the Queensland Supreme Court: http://www.loveforlife.com.au/node/1892 which back up what I am saying.

Its time for MANS revolution of love. We need to start re-creating community as I explained in my previous email see here: http://www.loveforlife.com.au/node/2571

We will only achieve victory if we serve each other as MAN, coming together as MAN to form united communities for MAN but we will all lose if we all stay as we are as self-centered individuals, each fighting our own Hu-Man personal battles without MANS community support.

How much more time will it take before everyone wakes up to this truth. I hope its only around the corner in a matter of months instead of a few years when it will be all too late for hu-mans.

Jack and John, please also read this unedited document/article here: http://www.loveforlife.com.au/node/2426 regarding "The Crown", Private Corporations and the deception of worshiping Con-Structs formed out of Black-Magic Languages like English and French. There are many other unedited articles to explore here: http://www.loveforlife.com.au/arthur_cristian

All the best
Arthur Cristian

------------------------------------

John Wilson wrote to Jack Shaw:

Dear Jack,

Looks perfectly straight, to me.

I have a "Certificate of Title" to my home ...but only a copy for which a clerk at the Lands Office pressed a button on his computer and out it came. On it, I am described as the "Tenant"...not the owner.

I've said for years that only when we get Trial by Jury back in full swing, will we be able to put right all this injustices of not having the Right to Property.

The argument you are putting forward is correct....but, without a Jury, merely "Pie in the Sky".

Therefore, the first and most important issue is Trial by Jury.

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.

----------------------------------------------

----- Original Message -----

From: Jack Shaw
To: John Wilson
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 9:43 PM
Subject: Re: a staggering 1/4 homeowners are in default

Dear John,
Think about this!

Let this sink in.......

Then I will give you more.
Jack

-----------------------------------------------

From Jack Shaw to John Wilson

----- Original Message ----

Imagine that on a previous date certain, a loan was taken out from a recognized financial institution by John Doe. Subsequently John Doe paid the loan obligation in full or retired the obligation in some
proper manner.

A problem arose when the bank was unable to return the original signed promissory note/obligation in consideration of this payment by John Doe.

The banking system, and in fact our entire financial system, private or public, is such that only
"original" signed notes or obligations are enforceable (duplicates, certified copies, or normal copies are not enforceable in any court) and clearly only the return of the original signed promissory note in
consideration of payment in full can be accepted as fully discharging the obligation and all potential or
contingent liability associated with it.

The bank in question either sold or assigned the original note to a third party immediately after inception of the original loan as part of their normal banking practice, thus they were unwilling and or
unable to return the original note which remains outstanding in the hands of others. Technically and
legally this note is still enforceable in spite of having already been paid (see Bills of Exchange Act).

The bank's presumption that their client, John Doe, would simply overlook this fact was erroneous and contrary to sound business notwithstanding that several tens of thousands of their lesser informed clients may follow such an ill-advised course of action on a day to day basis.

When the bank was legally noticed by John Doe that he was entitled to the return of his original
note, or in the alternative, he was entitled to the financial benefits derived by the bank through the
bank's sale and conversion of his note, the bank quietly acquiesced and contractually agreed that John

Doe was entitled to the financial benefits derived by the bank through the bank's conversion of his note together will all subsequent interest and or capital profits earned by the bank on that conversion, simply because they were not able to return the note since they no longer possessed it (or in some cases endorsed it to themselves as holder in due course, as opposed to a third party).

These issues are clearly supported by the Bank Act, the Bills of Exchange Act and many other such provisions of law.

The note, which is legally the property of the borrower, in this case John Doe, although temporarily (during the term of the nominal loan) it is held by the bank/lender as collateral security (not as owner) for repayment of the obligation, was presumed by John Doe (and tacitly admitted to by the bank) to have been sold by the bank at a market discount of its face value, resulting in the net proceeds of the conversion being deemed as "capital" of the bank.

The net price was then factored by the publicly advertised return on capital (offered to shareholders of the bank) from the inception of the loan (sale/conversion date) until the current date upon which the matter was brought to the bank's attention, resulting in a current value of the obligation in favor of John Doe.

The bank then agreed contractually to this, being its fully responsible bank obligation to hold this current value in an account on behalf of John Doe as opposed to continuing to operate under the erroneous presumption that this value belonged to them.

In summary, the bank's original clandestine actions and their subsequent acknowledgement by way of contractual obligations in settlement thereof, result in John Doe holding a properly and legally perfected bank obligation in his favor and against the bank in question.

It is de facto a "fully responsible bank obligation" or bank deposit in favor of the recovered note holder, John doe, which is confirmed by the bank.

The bank agreed to John Doe's claim and they agreed to confirm John Doe's claim in consideration of John Doe not making any public outcry and not trying to enforce collection or payment of the recovered obligation.

This means that although John Doe cannot literally spend his recovered note value, he can invest it (just like the bank had been doing) and have that investment capital confirmed as available and unencumbered for his investment purposes by the bank, and he can spend whatever earnings he may generate from that investment.

You might be surprised to learn that just about every prior loan you may have had and subsequently paid out, falls into the same category as John Doe's loan, insofar as you most likely never did receive the return of your original promissory note in its original form as you were entitled to.

This means quite literally and simply that you now have a valid claim against those lending institutions for 100% of the value of the original loan plus any and all interest paid, plus interest on that combined total from the date you paid it until the present date!

NCOY has witnessed dozens of people recover their equity in similar fashion as illustrated in the example of John Doe, and NCOY has witnessed the successful placement of some of these recovered
notes into opportunities that generate significant income. You may review a brief explanation of a
sample of the more common type of opportunities where such recovered notes are generally placed, by clicking here: "Private Placement Trading" (www.naturalgod.com/PrivatePlacement.pdf)

"Private Placement Trading" is now also available for viewing and printing in The Love For Life Website Here: http://www.loveforlife.com.au/node/2629 and there are many other documents to explore here: http://www.loveforlife.com.au/taxonomy/term/1 and here: http://www.loveforlife.com.au/banks

----------------------------

From Jack Shaw to Arthur Cristian

12th December 2007

To whom it may concern;

What do you think would happen at land titles if 1000 people showed up demanding to see their title?

Think of the heat the land titles officials would be under explaining this one.

1000 people demanding to view the “original” title.

1000 people wanting to know where or who is in possession of that “original.”

It must be done correctly, Notice of Demand seeking clarification, notarized and served on agents and principals alike.

Nothing like flushing the rats out into the open for full viewing.

Jack

-----------------------------------------------

12th December 2007

From Chuck Brucks to Arthur Cristian

You speak the TRUTH.

Chuck Brucks

-----------------------------------------------

12th December 2007

From Greg to Arthur Cristian

John Wilson's opinions on juries is making me sick and tied of his misconceived rhetoric.

He claims that he is going to teach all of us how to claim our rights and he does not even know how to claim his right to a have the matters in dispute deal with in a judicial proceeding in the courts so that his claim for a jury trial can be achieved.

He is just as dangerous as the fascists we all have to deal with every day and that is why he is still out there spruking this rubbish, he doing their work for them and cant see the wood for the trees.

He did not like my opinions on his matter in the court in Sydney and cant even answer the simple questions put to him and took me off his mailing list.

I still have access to his garbage and he is not prepared to admit that he is getting done like a dinner because of his ignorance and incompetence.

Dont send me anything that he has had any input in as it is offensive and I have no wish to be sent this utter garbage.

I think all of you should start to read yourselves instead of listening to the likes of Wilson and prior to him, the learnerd Peter Gargen who have caused more harm than what would have been caused if they had noting to do with the matter they have interfered with.

Greg

--------------------------------------------

12th December 2007

From Arthur Cristian to Greg

Hi Greg
Can't argue with you. I agree with you. I know both MEN, particularly John, very well, and they have very good intentions but have lost the way a very long time ago. They are both trapped in Con-Structs, brainwashed into them since early life. I have told them..

Greg, The only way we can win freedom is to re-create community and this is an act of love. Do we have Australians in the thousands capable of serving others and letting go of their self-centeredness? Only time will tell. If a movement of Australians do not come together shortly in an act of love for their fellow MAN, be prepared for a harrowing time over these next 5 years.

All my unedited work is found here: http://www.loveforlife.com.au/arthur_cristian

We will not win freedom through govern-men-t, rule of law or private corporation. What I have uncovered (with help from others) about languages and "the crown" is reality shattering. See: http://www.loveforlife.com.au/node/2426 and http://www.loveforlife.com.au/flier
All the best Greg
Arthur Cristian

-------------------------------------------

12th December 2007

From Greg to Arthur Cristian

Thanks for the reply but the act of love will do nothing to stop these vile fascists we now have ruling us like slaves.

The only thing I will be doing in the next five years is preparing to serve the revolution that is coming and its not that far away.

I wont be standing by smiling while the Police electrocute me and spray pepper spray into my eyes and bash me and break my bones and try to teach me a lesson, I already learnt very fast the hard way what they are prepared to do for the love of money, greed and power, when every thing has been stolen from me that was for my children its now time to stop playing games and teaching them a lesson is the only thing on my agenda.

You would have heard about the latest issue in Cairns about the sick vile female lying dishonest Catholic judge that claimed that a ten year old girl consented to being raped by ten males in Aurukun, this vile dishonest evil peice of shit had a hand in the bank stealing my family home and she is going to pay for it with the ultimate sacrifice if i ever get the chance and somebody else doesent beet me to it and she wont be on her own either.

I dont like to bring religion in to these issues but after being persued by the very people who have attempted to destroy me and my family over the past eight years and then discovering all of the Catholic connections in the Police Service, its union and the Public servants, solicitors barristers and judges and magistrates all being from the same religion I now know who the enemy is at the top of the food chain. Nothing to do with the innocient members who go to church on sundays its was one of them that identified where the problem was.

Greg

------------------------------------------

12th December 2007

From Arthur Cristian to Greg

Hi Greg
Please do not take this the wrong way, and its not your fault, but you have not been reading/studying the info Fiona and I have been posting to the Love For Life Website [see: http://www.loveforlife.com.au/arthur_cristian ] for at least the last 6 months, because if you had, you would be up to speed with me, with where I am at and where I am heading etc.

Also, by now you would have read all the Russian books "The Ringing Cedars" see http://www.loveforlife.com.au/node/1125 I highly recommend that you get these fast, easy to read books, ASAP from us (we sell them at $25.00 each + mail - the profit goes towards buying more books and circulating the info).

I can assure you that THERE IS A PATH TO VICTORY and I ask you to take some time out and re-learn about real-life. Much of what you say and know will be very true but it is also true that you do not use the evidence and the truthful information to DO HARM to yourself, to others and to Nature.

The path to victory is always found where we Do No Harm.

Please do not execute the harm you are intending as you are already on the way to being harmful to life (creation) in feelings, thoughts, words and soon deeds, becoming just like them, meaning, you are severing your link to soul and you will be without any link to soul. This is what the dark-side wants you to do. This is what its all about Greg. Even though its important, its not about the home, your children etc. Its about getting you to become just like them by joining them and then getting you to teach your children and others to follow your lead. Things are not what they seem to be.

Please, at least take some time out and read this: http://www.loveforlife.com.au/node/2426
With love for you, your family and other loved ones Greg
Arthur Cristian

--------------------------------------

12th December 2007

From K1G

Deed of Grant & Title Deed did not have you in tenancy - trespass was absolute (including The King who sold/gave you your land). Fee simple & Freehold have/are being "by-passed" by the current "legislative power" of the military/political/economic pawns of the zionists.

That is why "the Imperial War Conferences", the murder of the Czar and The Treaty of Versailles are so important to study & understand, along with international "loans" & fractional Reserve banking.

----------------------------------------------

12th December 2007

From Warren

Arthur Cristian,

Thanks for the email. Very interesting.

However, positive and monumental changes will only take place during man's rule of this earth when voters understand that they must implement employment contracts with prospective poiticians prior to their election. The electors must insist on aspiring politicians signing undated letters of resignation prior to their election, and those letters being actionable if the votes in the parliaments do not reflect the work-place agreements.

Other than that, or God forbid, an armed revolution, I do not forsee any way that major changes (such as insistence on trial by jury in all cases and Freehold title meaning what it says rather than the misnomer of present) can be implemented in this country.

Best Wishes

Warren

--------------------------------------------

-- Original Message -----

From: Jack Harper
To: Minister Belanger
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 9:42 AM
Subject: Re: [Campaign] Rights first - "Certificate of Title" to my home described me as the "Tenant".

Robin,
Thanks for the criticism.

Every honest man needs a critic and your babble-on criticism lends all the more credence to what I claim.

Again, I accept your offer and thank you very much.

Warmest regards,

Jack

-------------------------------------------------

----- Original Message -----

From: Minister Belanger
To: Globalsov ; Love For Life Campaign ; unhappy Harper
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 9:05 AM
Subject: Re: [Campaign] Rights first - "Certificate of Title" to my home described me as the "Tenant".

I see unhappyharper is promoting the false truth again tempting others to submit to mammon.....yes the bankstole the note but getting it back using their regulations does not work I know those who are sucked into Jonathans scam and they have recieved nothing...

jack reads gut has no faith to exercise so he exercises the wrtiting of others to lure others into his confusion....be careful of him that come with truth blended with lies....

Robin

----------------------------------------------------------------