MOST URGENT MESSAGE FOR ALL AUSTRALIANS by Linda Hewitt 15th October 2007

Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly versionSend to friendSend to friend

AUSI-WAKEUP.COM
Coming Soon
_________________________________________________________________________________

MOST URGENT MESSAGE FOR ALL AUSTRALIANS

Linda Hewitt

Stirling
Roma. Qld 4455

Why now are we writing to you?

Because on Thursday 3rd October 2007, several Queensland court cases went through the High Court of Australia and the Judges presiding made rulings over residential and rural land that effectively removes all land ownership from the people of Queensland, and puts that land ownership squarely into the hands of our State Government. On 3rd October 2007 the ruling that ‘fee simple’ and the ‘common law’ are now no longer recognised in Queensland, and upheld by the High Court of Australia, means that we no longer are part of the Commonwealth, and that we no longer have ownership or say in our land, and that Queensland is a separate entity that can make its own laws.

Good Morning Everyone,

Prior to reading this may I suggest that you print off the attached documents which have been prepared by Mr David Walter and read them carefully.

The documents are self explanatory. If you believe that they are correct and you believe that we should all stand up and be counted please forward this email to the following:-

Governor General of Australia - governor-genera l@ gg.gov.au

Facsimile number;_ (02) 6281 3760

Prime Minister of Australia the Hon John Howard MP

Tel: 02) 6277 7700

Fax: 02) 6273 4100

Electorate office:

Tel: 02) 9816 1300

Fax: 02) 9816 1349

Let the Governor of Q'land know you know what is happening:

Fax - 07) 3858 5701

Email is : fiona.collins @ govhouse.qld.gov.au

The Bankers Association is at :

Email: aba @ afmaservices.com - Attention Mr David Bell.

Leader of the Opposition Mr Kevin Rudd

Attention: Melissa

Email: info @ cbr.alp.org.au

Mr Rudd's office asked that you please make your concerns known.

Premier of Queensland Anna Bligh

Her address:- thepremier @ premiers.qld.gov.au Attention: The Premier

When writing to the Bankers Association suggest that maybe they would like to ask the State Government about how we are to pay off our land as they have greatly reduced the value of our land - we have no common law or equity in our land.

To advise Her Majesty, Queen Elizabeth II of the current situation with our land in Queensland - email the prewritten letter with your name and address on it to the Privy Council in England, Her Majesty will be notified.

Email:- judicial.committee @ pco.x.qsi.gov.uk.

We do not have a facsimile for that address.

Yesterday John Howard announced the Election Date. Before the people of Australia go to the voting boxes, they need to understand what has happened to their personal rights and land rights, and what has been done to the governmental institutions that are supposed to be there to protect the people of Australia.

All have been removed.

This is not a conspiracy theory. This is not our personal opinion. This is all FACT, and can be found written in black and white in the law books of Australia and in the continually-being reprinted Constitution of Queensland. The Commonwealth has been watching this for the last 9 years. Our federal government has known what is going on and has condoned it by their silence. They have been watching Beattie and seeing if the Australia people will wake up to it. Mr Rudd said on television yesterday that he ‘was going to fix the Federation” if elected!!

This is shocking information, absolutely inconceivable to most of you. Those amongst us who have been working on this information, especially those who work within the legal profession, have been shocked and angry at the blatant removal of peoples’ rights without one politician seeming to stand up and warn the people.

In Queensland, this all started with the National Party, (read the following information pages) with the Labour Party quickly enforcing all the changes possible under the new controls. When Peter Beattie removed the Constitution of Queensland in 2001 and replaced it with the New Qld Constitution, all the politicians in Parliament House passed and applauded the ‘new regime’.

This has also happened in NSW, and if we had the time and the resources, we would also look at the Constitutions of every other State in this country.

Ordinary people like yourselves have been reading this attached information, and saying that they simply cannot believe that our government has done this to us. “Is this really true?” YES, IT IS TRUE, AND THE FACT IS - THEY HAVE DONE IT!

This information personally affects you all. The following letters and court cases were sent to every politician in this country yesterday, ASKING THEM HOW THEY LET IT HAPPEN. Today the Banks, and every ordinary Australian is being sent this information. You are one of them, and I would hope you would then pass this on to everyone you know.

It is a long document, and it is hard to read. BUT IT IS ESSENTIAL THAT YOU READ IT. It presumes that you understand most things, and that you know about how all the governmental institutions work. You may not, but you will, upon reading, understand that all rural and residential land in Queensland (and NSW) is now under the ownership of the government of that State, (which in Qld has been made into a Corporation, and is not a governing body any more) and that you no longer own what you paid for, or pay taxes and rates on, and your equity in your land is worthless.

Your land, in Queensland, is being used as ‘collateral’ by the government. It is now their wealth base.

Why now are we writing to you? Because on Thursday 3rd October 2007, several Queensland court cases went through the High Court of Australia and the Judges presiding made rulings over residential and rural land that effectively removes all land ownership from the people of Queensland, and puts that land ownership squarely into the hands of our State Government. On 3rd October 2007 the ruling that ‘fee simple’ and the ‘common law’ are now no longer recognised in Queensland, and upheld by the High Court of Australia, means that we no longer are part of the Commonwealth, and that we no longer have ownership or say in our land, and that Queensland is a separate entity that can make its own laws.

We also know the situation is the same in NSW in the Peter Spencer case. Read and educate yourself.

To make it easier reading, here are a few explanations.

1. Governor removed, and placed into the Qld Parliament. Exp: Under the New Queensland Constitution of Queensland 2001 these are the people who are now in the Parliament and are quite clearly placed there to protect the assets of the State.

1) The Premier/President refer section 92 Constitution of Queensland 2001.

2) The Ministers of "the State"

3) The public officials of "the State" - like the Police, who are no longer public servants of the Crown to serve us but public servants of "the State", to tell us what to do on behalf of "the State", and have their powers delegated to them from the Minister of the State.

4) The Supreme and District Courts and the Judges of those Courts.

5) The Legislative Assembly who only has one vote and the Premier has the vote of veto on anything.

6) The Local Government Councils

7) The Governor - who is now a parliamentary secretary to the Premier who conducts the daily business of the corporation of the State and with the use of the Public Seal of the State, seals all documents signed by the Crown.

8) Last but not least - the people. As previously described, we, the people are part of the Government corporation.

The common law has been removed from the Supreme Court Act 1995 which now follows the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules. The Governor is the ‘Queen’s’ or the ‘Sovereign’s’ or the ‘Crown’s’ representative in each state, put there to protect you from incorrect governing, or incorrect politics, that may happen at any time. That is called the “Separation of Powers”, and means that the Queen as our Sovereign had a separate protective person in place, just in case you, the people, got ‘ripped off’ by your governing bodies. The Governor in Queensland was removed from that ‘no party allegiance’ position (done by the National Party, and ALL politicians knew what was happening) and given a position INSIDE the Queensland Government, thereby effectively making the Governor part of the Queensland Government and under the Premier’s control.

2. The Government Corporation, or the ‘Brigalow Corporation’. Exp: The Queensland Government is no longer a governing body, but instead made itself a business corporation. Just read the letter heads on paperwork you receive from any State office. They called the new business of governing the land of the people of Queensland the “Brigalow Corporation” under which all the land in our state has been removed from our ownership - to be used as collateral for this Corporation?

3. “Fee simple” Exp: the term used to describe your ownership of your freehold land. It is your total right to name yourself as the owner and user of that land, and the ‘Crown’ or the ‘Sovereign’ or the ‘Queen’ has deeded that land to you when you paid for it. It is a legal right to do whatever you want with your land, without interference from anyone else, including governments.

4. Voting in Australia Exp: If Kevin Rudd and John Howard have agreed to the removal of Queensland and New South Wales from the Constitutional government of Australia, and agreed that these States are separate bodies, how then can they call on the people of Australia to vote for them? Queensland is now a separate ‘country’, with its own rules and regulations. New South Wales is part-way to the same result. Both these gentlemen hold seats in what is now “technically” not part of the Commonwealth of Australia.

5. The Constitution and its role Exp: The Constitution of Australia is the ‘Bible’ or ‘guidebook’ on how the people of Australia are to be governed. The Constitutions of each of the States is subordinate to the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution and each State cannot make its own rules about our Common Law rights without our permission via referendum. If they do so, they are actually destroying these laws and leaving us undefended, unprotected and ungoverned democratically. That is EXACTLY what is happening here.

Australia needs a Bill of Rights to protect ourselves and our property. We all, as the sovereign people of Australia - present and future generations, need to have our rights and our property protected - so that we can live our lives and make a living without the over regulatory approached now favoured by our politicians and bureaucrats.

Remember it is we the people who elect these politicians and the public officials are there to work for the people and implement the policies and laws of the government. However to have laws passed by those elected members which remove our rights to how we can use our land - (even to repair and maintain it productively means we have to have a permit to do so now - see Wilson v Raddatz and Glasgow v Hall) means - and this has been clearly stated by the Queensland Court of Appeal in Bone v Mothershaw by Judge McPherson JJA - we have been " stripped of virtually all the powers which make ownership of land of any practical utility or value." There is no redress for any of us from these laws in any Court in the Commonwealth of Australia and no compensation. The High Court of Australia upheld Bone v Mothershaw [2002] QCA120.

This information is only the tip of the iceberg. But please read it. You, the Banks, the media, The Governor General of Australia and the Governor in every State, the Queen, the Privy Council of England, the Premiers of each State, and anyone else we can think of will receive a copy.

For your interest, DJ Walter just contacted the Prime Minister’s electorate office and was told not to bother sending the information. They are apparently disinterested, however his contact number is available for those who wish to forward the information to him.

Mr Rudd’s office did accept the information and would like to clearly to know your thoughts and your difficulties with this situation. This is in no way a political statement, it is merely what they asked us to give them.

Now YOU have to also write or fax or email each of these people. We have to let them know that we are angry and we want our country, our rights and our original Constitution back, NOW. After that, any changes are to come about must come through a Referendum of the People.

Do not sit back and think that everyone else will do this. You must do it too! These people have to be flooded with letters of concern so that they react. Please print off and fill in the letter attached, email it to the Queen. Then forward your version of this whole email to each of the listed emails (or their faxes) so they know many people are angry, and that you're emailing this to everyone else. Make them react!!

Print off this information and take it to everyone you know who does not have an email address. Make them read it.

Do not sit back – please defend yourselves and all that you thought you safely owned in Australia, including your freedom.

If you have any problems you may contact me at the below mentioned telephone number or David Walter on 07) 4096 3009 or samara.butterfly @ bigpond.com or Sue Maynes on 02) 6345 1254 or email sue.maynes @ bigpond.com.

Yours respectfully,

Linda Hewitt
Stirling
Roma. Qld 4455
Ph 07 46233707

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

His Excellency Major General Michael Jeffery AC CVO MC
Governor-General of the Commonwealth of Australia,
Government House,
Dunrossil Drive,
Yarralumla ACT 2600

Your Excellency,

RE: "The State" of Queensland - an independent Sovereign State outside of the Commonwealth of Australia, without a referendum of the sovereign people under section 53 of the Constitution Act 1867(Qld) as of 29th January 1999.

Your Excellency I bring this extremely serious matter to your attention as the Governor-General
of the Commonwealth of Australia and the Representative of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II.

On 29th January 1999 the Governor of the State of Queensland, the Representative of the Crown in Queensland was moved into the Constitution Act 1867 as a parliamentary secretary and a public official. This fractured the separation of powers and common law in the State of Queensland and also removed Queensland as a State of the Commonwealth of Australia and out of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act without a referendum of the sovereign people to remove the entrenched provisions as described in the Constitution Act 1867, section 53 - Certain measures to be supported by referendum, described in Reprint 2, reprinted 27th January 1998, section 53(1), section 1, 2, 2A, 11A, 11B, 14; and, section 53(1).

On 9th November 2001 the then Premier of the State of Queensland, the Honourable Peter Beattie presented to Parliament the new Constitution of Queensland 2001 Bill. The elected Members for the people of Queensland, the Members of the Legislative Assembly, passed the Bill, said only to 'modernise' the Constitution of Queensland. This constitution was assented to by the Governor on 3rd December 2001 and upon assent, under section 95 of the new Constitution, Acts subject to the Constitution Act 1867 were repealed. Section 92 immediately came into force which repealed parts of the Constitution Act Amendment Act 1922. This allowed the Parliament to move back prior to the removal of the Legislative Council at referendum in 1922 and 'recreate' the positions of that former Legislative Council.

The Acts Interpretation (State Commercial Activities) Act 1994 amended the Acts Interpretation Act 1954 to define "the State" to mean the Executive government of the State of Queensland. Under the provisions of this Act, "the State" may carry out commercial activities 'without further statutory authority' and 'without prior appropriation from the public accounts' {s47C.(3)} Section 47C. defines 'commercial activities to include 'commercial activities that are not within the ordinary functions of the State' and these functions may be delegated by a Minister to an officer of the State who may subdelegate delegated powers to another officer of the State. An 'officer of the State means a chief executive, or employee of the public sector or an officer of the public service'.

I refer to the following Acts - the Reprints Act 1992, the Statutory Instruments Act 1992, the Legislative Standards Act 1992. These Acts were used in conjunction with the Constitution of Queensland 2001, section 92 to create the corporation Government of the State and then further to repeal those Acts under section 95 of that Constitution. Those Acts moved back in time, one may say like the Tardis, reprinting, removing the Crown out of all Acts as far back as the Magna Carta then reprinting back to the Australia Acts (Requests) Act 1985 and removing all the positions as cited in that Act. The only part of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act which is recognized by Queensland is the Commonwealth Constitution commencing at section 9. The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act is not recognized which includes the High Court and the Federal Court.

By using the Australia Acts (Request) Act 1985 section 12 in conjunction with the other three State Acts, the Acts reprinted Queensland into a corporate State. In conjunction with the Acts Interpretation Act 1954 section 15DA(2) which allowed for the automatic commencement and assent of any Act that had been laying dormant for a period of twelve months, Acts which were framed to create the corporate State of Queensland in 1992, 1993 and 1994 were reprinted by the Reprints Act 1992 which is under the Department of the Premier.

Queensland then became, at the completion of these matters, without assent of any of the laws by the Crown or Her Representative, an independent sovereign State and fractured the common law and the separation of powers.

When people of the State of Queensland vote in a State election, the writs are not under the Hand of the Sovereign of Australia Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II but under the Public Seal of the State and issued by the Governor who is an entity within the Parliament of Queensland (or the Speaker for one vacant seat).

The elected Members of the sovereign people of the State of Queensland have, since 29th January 1999 taken it upon themselves, (contrary to the Criminal Code Act 1995(C'wth) to which they are all subject under Chapter 7 - The proper administration of Government), to create for themselves, under the Constitution of Queensland 2001, a corporation Government in which the sovereign people of Queensland and their property are mere chattels of the State. This surely is a breach of the trust and faith which the electors of Queensland placed in their elected members to uphold and respect the laws of the Commonwealth.

Queensland is now outside the Commonwealth of Australia as an independent sovereign State
without common law, and the people are subject to civil and statute law only. The 'common law
and general jurisdiction'; the 'Laws of England to be applied in the administration of justice' and
'equitable jurisdiction' have been removed under the Supreme Court Act 1995(Qld) Reprint
number 2A dated 2nd March, 2001 under Schedule 2 of the Constitution of Queensland 2001.

What now happens to people who have been prosecuted, fined, imprisoned etc. under the civil
law of Queensland, which does not exist elsewhere in the Commonwealth of Australia. The
sovereign people of Queensland have not voted in any referendum to allow civil statute law to
remove their common law rights.

The people of Queensland are still, under section 117 of the Commonwealth of Australia
Constitution Act, subjects of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II and protected by Her
laws as there has been no referendum under section 128 of the Commonwealth of Australia
Constitution Act to allow the separation of Queensland from the Commonwealth of Australia.

The jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of Queensland is found in the Constitution of
Queensland 2001, Part 5 - Powers of the State. Therefore it is assumed that the Judges
of the Supreme and District Courts of Queensland must protect the 'assets' of the State of
Queensland and find only in favour of the State, not in favour of the registered owners
of private land who have lost, under the statute laws of Queensland, the rights to use their
fee simple land as they see fit.

As stated by Chief Justice de Jersey in the Supreme Court of Queensland Appeal for Mrs
Catherine Elizabeth Burns
"[5] These contentions are plainly untenable. Mrs Burns certainly has an indefeasible interest as registered proprietor of an estate in fee simple in the land. But the sovereign law making power of the Queensland Parliament, considered recently in a somewhat similar factual context in Bone v Mothershaw……….. In a different, though analogous way, the Parliament is clearly empowered to authorize planning schemes which restrict what the owners of estates in fee simple may lawfully do with their land."

Further, Judge McPherson JJA in Bone v Mothershaw [2002] QCA120 stated:-

"For this severe limitation on his rights as owner, he has received and will receive no compensation, although he continues to enjoy the privilege of paying the rates that the Council levies on his land. The action taken by the Council was no doubt undertaken in the public interest, as it claims, of the citizens of Brisbane; but it is not they who will bear the financial disadvantages of the action taken in their interest.

[24] The question is whether our legal system permits such prohibitory action to be taken.
The Council has not taken any interest of Mr Bone’s, so as to attract the operation of the Acquisition of Land Act 1967 or otherwise. He retains unimpaired, for what it is worth, his estate in fee simple absolute in the land. He has been stripped of virtually all the powers which make ownership of land of any practical utility or value. There is, as is attested by an affidavit from the valuer provided at the hearing, no doubt that the value of the land has been greatly reduced. But the law provides no remedy for this action or its consequences when it is the result of legislation validly passed under law-making authority that by its terms or nature authorises or permits such an outcome.

[26] The same opinion is explicit in the reasoning of the High Court in Durham
Holdings Pty Ltd v State of New South Wales (2001) 75 ALJR 501, holding that a
State Parliament has the legislative power to deprive a person of property without
compensation."

What can now be done for all the sovereign people of the State of Queensland who have no common law property rights and this also includes the aboriginal people of this State who have had their land under the Native Title Act 1991 and the Torres Strait Islander Act 1991 placed into the Brigalow Corporation of the State of Queensland? All people in Queensland, regardless of race, colour or creed have had their land, held in a Deed of Grant in fee simple, removed from their possession and into that of the Brigalow Corporation of the State. They now only hold a statutory title in their land.

The New South Wales Court has cited Bone v Mothershaw and Burns v State of Queensland and Croton in a matter involving Mr Peter Spencer of Queanbeyan in New South Wales.

New South Wales removed the Governor in 1987 under the Consolidated Amendment Act 1987.

I now draw Your Excellency's attention to the matter of Mrs Catherine Elizabeth Burns, which is before the High Court of Australia. The 78B notice pertaining to this matter is attached to this correspondence. This notice has been filed in the High Court of Australia and forwarded to all Attorney Generals of the Commonwealth of Australia. This Notice is now a public document.

In early 2003 I was approached by the Member for Hinchinbrook, Mr Marc Rowell of the State Parliament of Queensland requesting my assistance with a problem one of his constituents was involved in. The lady in question, Mrs Catherine Elizabeth Burns, a widow of some seventy three years of age, had purchased at public auction in Cardwell, Queensland in 1968, approximately 25 acres of land. Her land is situated opposite the Hinchinbrook Resort and faces the main north south highway. This land was purchased in a common law estate of fee simple, the original Deed of Grant for which Mrs Burns still has in her possession. The land was purchased under the provisions of the Land Act 1962 and a requirement upon purchase of the Deed of Grant in fee simple was that the land was to be cleared for a productive use. The land was cleared by Mr Buddy Dingwall, inspected by the then Department of Lands and a Certificate of Title was issued under the provisions of the Real Property Act 1861 in November 1970.

Mrs Catherine Burns, at the time of the purchase, was married to Sergeant Duncan Charles Burns, OIC of the Cardwell Police Station. Their plan for purchasing the land was, when Mr Burns retired from the Queensland Police Service, they would build some small tourist cabins on the property as it is in a prime location, facing onto the north south highway and opposite Hinchinbrook Island and they would then be self provided for in their retirement years. Unfortunately Mr Burns passed away prior to his reaching retirement age and Mrs Burns has never remarried.

As Your Excellency will be aware, a Deed of Grant in fee simple is a common law contract, the validity of which is known, upheld and recognized world wide and is held as security for all banks and lending institutions not only in the Commonwealth of Australia but world wide, when those institutions are providing money for private lending. Financial institutions and lenders do not now hold a common law estate in fee simple but a Certificate of Title to the land, subject to a statutory instrument. Technically they, as with Mrs Burns and myself, hold nothing.

In the State of Queensland, by definition under the Acts Interpretation Act 1954(Qld), section 36 - Meaning of Commonly used words and expressions - definition of 'person' includes an individual and a corporation. Therefore Mrs Burns (and all other people of Queensland) as a 'person' is thus tied inextricably to the State corporation.

This is also applicable, by definition, to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander land as an 'Aborigine' is now defined as a person of the Aboriginal race of Australia.

It must be noted that the definition of 'person' in the Acts Interpretation Act 1901(C'wth) section
22(1)(a) expressions used to denote persons generally (such as "person", "party", "someone", "anyone", "no-one", "one", "another" and "whoever"), include a body politic or corporate as well as an individual;

The Acts Interpretation Act 1954(Qld) defines property both present and future, owned by
you as an 'individual and a corporation' as subject to a statutory instrument only and that statutory instrument is not only applicable to your land, but all property as you, as a person now own, as opposed to the previous common law indefeasible deed of grant in fee simple, only an interest in your land under a statutory title. All land, including private land held previously in the common law estate of inheritance in fee simple by private individuals, is now held by the corporation of the State of Queensland known as the Brigalow Corporation.

I refer Your Excellency to the Second Reading Speech of the Premier the Honourable Peter Beattie, for the Constitution of Queensland 2001 Bill and the Parliament of Queensland Bill 2001, presented to Parliament on 9th November 2001.

In this Speech, the Premier therein described the entities which were to make up the Parliament under the new Constitution.

"But this Act is much more it is the fundamental law of Queensland that underpins our system of government.

The entities it provides for include this Parliament, the Supreme and District Courts of this State and the system of local government that we know in Queensland. The office holders under this Act include the Governor of Queensland, the Ministers of the Crown and the judges of the Supreme and District Courts. This law is of supreme importance."

It is now not a Parliament elected by the sovereign people, but a State owned corporation and inside that Parliament/Corporation are the entities of the Supreme and District Courts, which handle matters under the Property Law Act 1974(Qld) and further Courts such as the Land Court, the Planning & Environment Court; the Governor of Queensland, the Ministers of the Crown, the Judges of the Supreme and District Courts and the Local Government.

Further in the speech, the Premier stated "Our entity as a Sovereign State, the democratic ideals on which our State is built, rest on our Constitution".

The new Constitution of Queensland 2001 was assented to by the Governor on 3rd December 2001. Here two questions that I propose:- The Governor of the State is now inside the Parliament as a parliamentary secretary and holds the Public Seal of the State and seals all documents signed under the Hand of the Sovereign with the Public Seal of the State, therefore rendering void, any contracts, Acts, laws etc. under the Hand of the Sovereign. The Governor is quite clearly now inside the Parliament, conducting the daily business of the Government and allocating the laws applicable to each Government Department of the State. The public servants of the State are not public servants of the Crown, they are public servants of the State and as the State owns all property within the State of Queensland, they have dominion over all property and aspects of your daily life.

The Constitution of Queensland 2001 was assented to by the Governor which leads to two major problems:-

i) The assent of the Governor must be defective as the Governor is now inside the Parliament as a 'parliamentary secretary'

ii) To have Queensland become an independent Sovereign State and to remove the common law, set up statutory civil law and have Queensland not recognize the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act but only that Act from section 9 onwards, a full referendum would have been required of the people of the Commonwealth of Australia to enact, validly, that Queensland, from 29th January 1999 was now independent of the Commonwealth of Australia and a State in its own right.

In the Second Reading Speech for the Constitution the Premier stated that the Constitution would be 'broadly accessible' to the people of Queensland. Considering that this Act has effectively removed all common law property rights from the people of Queensland it should, one would reasonably assume, have been put to a referendum of the people.

However in the Second Reading Speech the Premier stated -

"… The Constitution of Queensland 2001 does not include a statement of executive power vesting in the Sovereign as recommended by LCARC. The Government is of the view that LCARC's recommended expression of executive power is too narrow and does not adequately reflect the democratic convention that requires the Governor to act in accordance with advice from his or her Ministers"…and further…………"Those provisions that are said to be referendum entrenched remain untouched in the shells of their current Acts."

In the matter of Mrs Catherine Elizabeth Burns, she applied for and was refused the right to clear her private land because it 'may' be used by the Southern Cassowary and was 'known habitat for the mahogany glider" even though correspondence from the Director General of the Environmental Protection Agency stated that Mrs Burns land was not part of the Mahogany Glider Recovery Plan 2000 - 2004. The State Government of Queensland with the Natural Heritage Trust of Australia has spent $11 million dollars purchasing land in the Cardwell region under the Mahogany Glider Recovery Plan 2000 - 2004 to protect the habitat for this species. Mrs Burns was not contacted with regard to her land nor did she receive correspondence to indicate that her land was 'known habitat'. This was a decision made by a public official of the Department of Natural Resources and Mines, Mr Luke Croton.

I have assisted Mrs Burns in this matter by writing to the Premier of Queensland, to no avail and preparing and presenting this matter before three Courts in this State. All appeals have been dismissed under the Court of Appeal Queensland decision Bone v Mothershaw [2002] QCA 120 The Supreme and District Courts of Queensland as enties of the Parliament must, therefore, protect the assets of the State, the real property owned by the Brigalow Corporation of the State of Queensland.

This matter is now before the High Court of Australia in an attempt to obtain a resolution for Mrs Burns. She is in dire financial straits, she has had to sell her family home which has been in her family for four generations as she could not, on an aged pension, afford to maintain the family home and pay rates of more that $2000.00 per annum on the Cardwell property. She has lost all her private possessions which she had kept on her son's property in Innisfail when Cyclone Larry devastated the area. She has been forced to rely on her family for a roof over her head as she is not eligible for State housing as they advised her she owns a property in Cardwell. This is despite advising them that she, under orders from the Courts of Queensland, can do nothing with the land because it is mahogany glider habitat.

This widowed grandmother has to pay rates of approximately $2,500 per annum on the property for the public benefit of the people and the State of Queensland. There is absolutely no equity or benefit in the land for her as the registered owner of the land, she cannot build on the land or sell the land, the equity the fee simple is now owned by the State and taken with no compensation as required under section 53(xxxi) of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act.

Under the Constitution of Queensland 2001, by the removal of common law in the State of Queensland, the public officials of this State can acquire an interest in private registered land without compensation, for the benefit of the State Government corporation. This also includes the property owned now and in the future as the sovereign people are in fact " an individual and a corporation" and therefore subject to the corporation Government of the State of Queensland.

The sovereign people of the Commonwealth of Australia have never been required at a referendum by virtue of section 128 of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia to vote to allow "the State" of Queensland to fracture the Commonwealth and become an independent sovereign state.

It is quite clear when the lending institutions become aware that any persons who own any property in Queensland - especially real property which has always the main security for lending to home owners, farmers etc, the basis of their lending against real property will be compromised. There may well be a cessation of lending in this State for the purchase of private homes or land for farming and agriculture as "the State" corporate Government can render void any contract with an individual or company and acquire an interest over land without consultation or compensation and the Courts inside the Government will protect the assets of the corporation as they have done in matters by virtue of Bone v Mothershaw [2002] QCA120.

The common law and references to the Crown have been removed out of the Supreme Court Act 1995(Qld).

Civil law and statute law have a very different requirement for the committing of any offence, whether an indictable offence, a summary offence, a simple offence or an absolute offence such as a traffic offence where a guilty mind is not required to commit that offence.Under the civil law system, which is now subject to the Uniform Civil Procedures Rules of the Supreme Court Act 1991(Qld), every person is guilty until they prove their innocence.

The Supreme and District Court, other courts and the Judges and Justices of those Courts are now inside the corporation of the Government, and not sworn representatives of the Crown. Under the Constitution of Queensland 2001, all documents are issued or signed under the Public Seal of the State. This would be any document appointing a politician, a Judge or any person who should swear an oath of allegiance to the Sovereign. The Governor now seals that document in accordance with the Constitution of Queensland 2001 section 37 with the Public Seal of the State therefore voiding the appointment of any of those people by the Sovereign but making those people in effect 'officers of the State' and subject to the 'Powers of the State' as cited in Part 5 of the Constitution of Queensland 2001.

It is quite clear that those who have been put in power by the sovereign people of the State have, since 1992 when the original Acts were being framed, had a full intention in time, to bring about their own personal agendas, regardless of the wishes of the sovereign people who have, in good and open faith and intention, by secret ballot at elections, voted these people into positions of power and of trust and who must swear or affirm an oath of allegiance to Her Majesty that they will uphold Her laws for the benefit of the people of the State of Queensland. That power has turned from the power granted by the people to the Legislative Assembly to make laws for 'peace welfare and good government' on behalf of the sovereign people of Queensland using funds from taxes paid by the citizens of Queensland and all of Australia, into a totalitarian system of Government, whereby we the people are subject to the corporation Government of the State.

The ramifications caused by these actions carried out over a long period of time by the Members of the body politic dating back as far as 1992 are so vast and wide spread it will take a long time to remedy and repair the whole system of government in Queensland. The Parliament can make any laws they wish but I do not believe that under a democratic system of Government they are elected to Parliament to make draconian laws which remove the rights of the sovereign people to their use of their land without fair and just compensation.

I respectfully suggest an immediate return to a common law government of people elected by the sovereign people under a writ of the Sovereign, not under a writ of the Election Act of the State.

In the Second Reading Speech the Premier stated "Those provisions that are said to be referendum entrenched remain untouched in the shells of their current Acts."

I do not believe that the provisions are 'said' to be referendum entrenched but in actual fact are, under a Westminster system of Government.

The former Premier said in the Second Reading Speech for the constitution, 'we all look forward to the day when we are a republic'. The people of the Commonwealth of Australia at referendum in 1999 voted against a republic but wished to retain the present system of Government with a clear separation of powers under common law and for the Commonwealth of Australia to remain exactly the same with a combined Federation of States as was created in 1901.

Queensland is not a republic and if the system we have at present is the type of republic as envisaged by our leaders then, as shown in the 78B notice page 5 paragraph 15 which is attached -"An estate of inheritance in land or equity can not and must not be subject to statute law. That in effect extinguishes or regulates that same inheritance, completely, ignoring section 52 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act, for to do so anarchy and ruin will prevail.
For as soon as the financial institutions withdraw because of lack of tenure in land held of common law, poverty will soon follow."

The only tenure that any financial institutions hold in land in Queensland today, even though they may believe they hold an estate in fee simple, is in fact held by the corporation of the State, the Brigalow Corporation and is now the full property of the State. The lending institutions now only hold a statutory title and an interest only in the land by virtue of the Statutory Instruments Act 1992 under which the rules of the Supreme and District Courts are found under section 12 of that Act.
Reference - Glasgow v Hall, 2007 HCA Trans 557 (3 October 2007) and Wilson v Raddatz,
2007 HCA Trans 558 (3 October 2007). Both Mr Glasgow and Mr Wilson were charged,
convicted and fined in Queensland and that decision upheld by all Courts in Queensland
including the Court of Appeal Queensland. Subsequently those matters were placed before the
High Court of Australia hopefully for resolution. The international instrument, cited in those
decisions, was the Treaty No. (1193)ATS32 signed at Rio de Janeiro 5 June 1992, Section 10 of
Agenda 21 under which the Natural Heritage Trust of Australia Act 1997(C'wth) was framed.
This Act allows farmers to use their land in an ecologically sustainable way for the benefit of
the people and the economy of Australia and the international economy. Under this Act $1.35
billion dollars from the partial sale of Telstra were placed in the Natural Heritage Trust of
Australia Account. The farmers using their land under the provisions of this Act could receive
funding for the loss of the use of their land if the cessation of their activities was of the public
benefit.

Mr Gregory Wilson a builder and a grazier and his company Wilsons' Development Pty Ltd
and Mr and Mrs Keith Glasgow, long term farmers and graziers both hold their land in Deeds
of Grant in fee simple and their land was registered under the Real Property Act 1861. The
land is commonly known as freehold title under the Torrens System.

The High Court of Australia have now clearly rejected, by their decision, those common
law contracts and every other common contract in the Commonwealth of Australia. Those
contracts are now void and are totally subject to the 'stewardship' of the Commonwealth, the
State, the local government councils and the public officials employed by those entities.

No person or corporation who is an owner of any property, real or personal, in the
Commonwealth of Australia has any right to the use of that property as all contracts at
common law have been rendered void. Their rights to their property are all subject to
the regulations imposed by the Federal, State and local Governments in the Commonwealth
of Australia.

It is therefore clear that the following Act, based on an international treaty, has
no relevance or validity in this Commonwealth of Australia today.

Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission Act 1986
Act No. 125 of 1986 as amended

Schedule 2 - International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
Section 3
The States Parties to the present Covenant
Considering that, in accordance with the principles proclaimed in the Charter of the United Nations, recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world,

Article 17
1. No one shall be subjected to arbitrary or unlawful interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to unlawful attacks on his honour and reputation.

2. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.

As these matters have been upheld by the High Court of Australia, it is clear that the value of land held in a Deed of Grant in fee simple, which was an estate of inheritance at common law and recognized world wide as security for lending institutions and contracts for individuals and corporations, as the asset base and security for loans etc. has been greatly reduced for the registered owners of that real property.

To quote the words of Judge McPherson JJA in Bone v Mothershaw [2002] QCA120:- "He (Mr Bone) retains unimpaired, for what it is worth, his estate in fee simple absolute in the land. He has been stripped of virtually all the powers which make ownership of land of any practical utility or value".

The statement abovementioned is of particular relevance to Mr and Mrs Glasgow and Mr Wilson. Mr Keith Glasgow was prosecuted by an officer of the State for cutting native vegetation to feed his starving livestock in this time of sever drought. It is of interest to note that the Warrant to Enter executed by the public officials of this State was not for Mr Glasgow's property 'Bayfield' but was for a property approximately 27 kilometres away known as 'Valentine Plains'. This fact was presented to all the Courts to which this matter was taken and ignored.

Mr Gregory Wilson was prosecuted by an officer of the State for repairing severe erosion on a watercourse on his property by filling the degraded areas in with dead and dying black wattle and other vegetation and weeds which were of no value to the livestock as a food source. Mr Wilson then covered the vegetation with soil and replanted the areas with pasture grass.

The reason that I have forwarded this document to Your Excellency is that the Federal Government is to call a Federal Election. Queensland cannot be included in those writs. As a result of Bone v Mothershaw being upheld by the Supreme Court of Appeal in Queensland where it upheld that Queensland is an independent sovereign State and the Queensland Acts Interpretation Act 1954(Qld) defines the Constitution as the Commonwealth Constitution, not the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act in its entirety, the people of Queensland are 'an individual and a corporation' and have no sovereignty in any Federal Election.

As stated, I have attached the 78B Notice for Mrs Catherine Burns for your information. I have, by attaching that document placed it there for your perusal to assist you in clarifying the problems we have in Queensland at this time and which I believe must be rectified immediately. It has not been forwarded to you to in any way pre-empt the High Court of Australia or to show them any disrespect at all.

The following information comes from a comparison document - 'A Difference Report by www.SoftInterface.com' for the Constitution Act 1867. This shows the amendments, deletions and alterations to the Constitution that have been carried out to support the changes to the Constitution without referendum. This shows that under the original Constitution Act 1867 and the modified Constitution Act 1867, Reprint No. 2A there have been 114 changes,131 additions and 116 deletions found. The removal of the Governor under section 14 of that Act is only one of the amendments to that Constitution without any referendum of the people by virtue of section 53 of the Constitution Act 1867.

It shows in this comparison document that subject to section 6 and 7 of the Constitution Act 1867 the corporation clearly has the right to hold any estate, which in this case is an estate of common law fee simple, to be acquired from any other person or in or on any Crown land in Queensland to be contracted or agreed with a Suncorp Insurance Commissioner and finance. It is therefore clear that the Government corporation of the State, to which a person as an individual and a corporation is tied, holds our property, in this case our common law estate in fee simple. All that any person holding an estate in fee simple at common law in Queensland can only hold the certificate of title which is subject to a statutory instrument.

As the corporation of Queensland, when it was formed, had no assets, it had to acquire assets if they wished to borrow. Under the Queensland Government (Land Holding) Amendment Act 1992, they immediately took all the Crown land and estates in fee simple registered under the Property Law Act 1974 as equity for the corporation without compensation to the registered owners of the property whether they live in Queensland or anywhere else and converted that property for their own use, contrary to Chapter 7 of the Criminal Code Act 1995(C'wth) - The proper administration of Government.

The owners of that property taken by the corporation can only hope that the corporation has not used our real property as an asset to borrow funds for the corporation for whatever purpose. If the independent State corporation fails or borrowing is too extensive, it will again be the sovereign people who will bear the financial consequences.

Your Excellency, I am not a legally qualified person, nor do I have a degree of any sort. I am merely a subject of her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, and a citizen of our great nation.

I therefore request of Your Excellency to do whatever is in your executive power to return Queensland to a democratically elected common law system of Government and with all due respect, this will have to be done prior to any writs issued for a Federal Election which is now pending. No one can vote in a Federal Election as all we are voting for is a person whose authority and standing as a Federal Member has no relevance in the independent sovereign State of Queensland.

I forward this correspondence for your attention and action. If you have any queries in regard to this document I can be contacted at the above address.

Yours sincerely,

(David J. Walter)
11th October 2007

Att: 78B Notice filed in High Court of Australia

cc: The Hon John Howard MP
Prime Minister of Australia

The Hon. Phillip Ruddock MP,
Attorney General of Australia

Mr Kevin Rudd MP - Leader of the Opposition

The President of the Senate of Australia

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

INFORMATION PAPER

MATTER PENDING - TO BE DETERMINED BY THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA - CATHERINE ELIZABETH BURNS:-

Mrs Burns, is 73 years of age and a widow. She has been refused to be allowed to selectively clear her private registered land for sale. This land is situated opposite the Hinchinbrook Resort in Cardwell. Mrs Burns purchased this 26 acres in 1968 at public auction, paid for the land and received a Deed of Grant in fee simple. The requirement was that the land had to be cleared prior to the land being registered under the provisions of the Real Property Act 1861.this was done in 1970.

As time passed, the situation changed, and though Mr and Mrs Burns had planned to build a small tourism venture on the land so they would not be a burden on the Government, Mr Burns, a Police Officer in the Queensland Police Service, passed away prior to reaching retirement age. Mrs Burns has never remarried.

Mrs Burns, due to the financial difficulty of finding the money to pay the rates which are now almost $2,500,00 per annum when she only receives an aged pension, decided to selectively clear the land to sell. Where the property is situated, the block adjacent to the Burns property which is the same size as hers, has been subdivided into 13 lots and the majority of the land in the immediate area has also been subdivided into small rural residential lots and have homes built on them.

The Decision Notice placed over her land by a public official, Luke Croton of Department of Natural Resources and Mines, Townsville, and upheld by the courts of Queensland, including the Supreme Court of Appeal citing Bone v Mothershaw, has effectively reduced the value of Mrs Burns' land to the same status of Mr Bone 'he(she) continues to enjoy the privilege of paying the rates that the Council levies on his (her) land' and she is allowed to walk on it.

This matter has been ongoing in the Courts of Queensland since 2003 and has now been placed before the High Court of Australia in an application for special leave to appeal.

The decision notice issued by Luke Croton under section 3.5.15 of the Integrated Planning Act 1997(Qld) was not in relation to clearing native vegetation on private land, but was under the Decision Stage, section 3.5.1 which is a referral to a building agency (of the State) for an application if required and the decision stage for the application starts on the day after all other stages applying to the application have ended. The decision notice itself is, in fact and law, void. Mrs Burns only requires an application under the Integrated Planning Act 1997(Qld) for the reconfiguration of a lot or a material change of use. The clearing of the native vegetation is a component part of a development. She clearly did not require any permit.

There are still several matters requiring resolution by the High Court of Australia. All of these matters have been dismissed from the Courts of Queensland based on the matter of Bone v Mothershaw in that, as stated in the Courts of Queensland - Queensland is an independent sovereign State.

Mrs Burns' matter will clearly show you the problems which have occurred in this State with regard to the rights to your private freehold land.

The Decision of the High Court of Australia for Keith Glasgow and Gregory Wilson has removed the ownership of land and property as we knew it in this county and has not upheld our rights as sovereign people under the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act.

The Second Reading Speech of the former Premier the Honourable Peter Beattie when he created the new Government of Queensland, placed inside the Parliament himself as Premier (President), the Ministers, the Governor as a parliamentary secretary, the judges and justices of the Supreme and District Courts, the Supreme and District Court, the Local Government Councils. The public officials are not public officials of "the Crown" but public officials of "the State" of Queensland. As all real property has now been taken back by the State and held under the State corporation the Brigalow Corporation, the public officials are in fact now working for the owners of the land, the State Government of Queensland. When the State of Queensland removed the land and placed it under the ownership of the State, they did so without compensation or without a referendum.

The matter of Bone v Mothershaw was upheld by the Queensland Supreme Court of Appeal , consisting of three justices, and as stated in that decision by Judge McPherson JJA:-

"He (Mr Bone) retains unimpaired, for what it is worth, his estate in fee simple absolute in the land. He has been stripped of virtually all the powers which make ownership of land of any practical utility or value"

KEITH RONALD GLASGOW & GREGORY WILSON - BOTH THESE MATTERS WERE SENT TO THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA ON APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL. BOTH APPLICATIONS WERE DISMISSED.

DECISION OF THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA 3RD OCTOBER 2007

The High Court of Australia stated in their decisions that they saw no reason to doubt the correctness of the decisions upheld by the Court of Appeal. Part of those decisions were to use Bone v Mothershaw [2002] QCA 120.

Judge McPherson JJA of the Queensland Court of Appeal in Bone v Mothershaw [2002] QCA120 stated:-

"For this severe limitation on his rights as owner, he has received and will receive no compensation, although he continues to enjoy the privilege of paying the rates that the Council levies on his land. The action taken by the Council was no doubt undertaken in the public interest, as it claims, of the citizens of Brisbane; but it is not they who will bear the financial disadvantages of the action taken in their interest.

[24] The question is whether our legal system permits such prohibitory action to be taken.

The Council has not taken any interest of Mr Bone’s, so as to attract the operation of the Acquisition of Land Act 1967 or otherwise. He retains unimpaired, for what it is worth, his estate in fee simple absolute in the land. He has been stripped of virtually all the powers which make ownership of land of any practical utility or value. There is, as is attested by an affidavit from the valuer provided at the hearing, no doubt that the value of the land has been greatly reduced. But the law provides no remedy for this action or its consequences when it is the result of legislation validly passed under law-making authority that by its terms or nature authorises or permits such an outcome.

Therefore what the High Court of Australia upheld was that the Queensland Government can now make any laws they like over any property, that is private registered land, native title land, and personal property. This means that neither Mr Glasgow, Mr Wilson, nor any other person in Queensland have any protection under the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act. As explained in my letter to the Governor General of Australia, we have no property right in Queensland and we have no rights as individual citizens, regardless of race, colour or creed. Our property is now the property of the Queensland Government corporation and protected by the Queensland Government corporation - you are now, as defined in the Acts Interpretation Act 1954 - a 'person' is an individual and a corporation.

This situation will remain unless the majority of people in Australia are willing or interested enough to make it clear to all people and groups including those people that created this situation and allowed it to continue that it was not in consultation with or accordance with the wishes of the sovereign people of Australia. Those who should be made aware of this situation include the financial institutions, community groups and the politicians, both Federal, State and local government and of all political parties. We at no time voted for this situation in a referendum of the people and we certainly did not vote to lose the estate of inheritance at common law in fee simple on our land.

All contracts are common law contracts. The common law contracts of Mr Glasgow and Mr Wilson have been breached by the decision of the courts of Queensland and the High Court of Australia. As stated in the Court of Appeal decision Bone v Mothershaw
"He has been stripped of virtually all the powers which make ownership of land of any practical utility or value". This has come about by the land being removed into the Brigalow Corporation of the State Government of Queensland and public officials being given 'stewardship' over our land.

This therefore, must give people who own their own home to live in, those people in the primary industries who make their living from the land, or even people planning to purchase real property, serious cause for concern if they have, as stated by Judge McPherson in Bone v Mothershaw "been stripped of virtually all the powers which make ownership of land of any practical utility or value".

The High Court went on to say that the Applicant's reliance on international 'instruments' is misconceived. Therefore all international agreements signed by Australia, eg. Civil and Political Rights, the Convention on Biological Diversity, etc. etc. appear to have no relevance in Queensland.

Keith Glasgow appealed to the Court of Appeal, Queensland to dismiss the decision of the District Court Judge Nace, to uphold the Appeal coming from the Magistrates Court.

Judge Nace upheld the penalty coming from the Integrated Planning Act 1997 for the starting of an assessable development without a development permit.

Gregory Wilson appealed to the Court of Appeal, Queensland to dismiss the decision of the District Court Judge Brabazon, which upheld the Appeal from the Magistrates Court decision.

In both dismissals of the Appeals in the Queensland Court of Appeal - no extension of time was granted and Bone v Mothershaw was cited in both decisions of the Court of Appeal.

The charges - criminal - related to the clearing of native vegetation on Keith Glasgow's land. The Court of Appeal (Queensland) - the highest court in Queensland, rejected the applicant's argument that the Act did not apply to land held in fee simple and that land was not comprehended by the term 'freehold land' in the Act.

Mr Keith Glasgow was prosecuted by an officer of the State for cutting native vegetation to feed his starving livestock in this time of severe drought. It is of interest to note that the Warrant to Enter executed by the public officials of this State was not for Mr Glasgow's property 'Bayfield' but was for a property approximately 17 kilometres away known as 'Valentine Plains'. This fact was presented to all the Courts to which this matter was taken and ignored. In the District Court the Judge stated that Mr and Mrs Glasgow had purchased 'Valentine Plains' in the 1980's. The Glasgow's do not own that property.

Mr Gregory Wilson was prosecuted by an officer of the State for repairing severe erosion on a watercourse on his property by filling the degraded areas in with dead and dying black wattle and other vegetation and weeds which were of no value to the livestock as a food source. Mr Wilson then covered the vegetation with soil and replanted the areas with pasture grass. The Warrant executed over Mr Wilson was also void as it was sworn out under the Land Act 1994.
Tree clearing under that Act pertains to State owned land only.

For Mr Glasgow and Mr Wilson to be prosecuted for these actions, which to any farmer is regarded as part of responsible farm management and that prosecution upheld throughout every court in the land, defies logic.

The Commonwealth Act, the Natural Heritage Trust of Australia Act 1997 is part of the implementation requirements of the international treaty - the Convention on Biological Diversity signed in Rio de Janeiro in June 1992. Funds of $1.35 billion from the partial sale of Telstra were the main source of funding for the Natural Heritage Trust of Australia Account.

The main object of this 'Account is to conserve, repair and replenish Australia's natural capital infrastructure'. In the Preamble of this Act it shows that 'government leadership be demonstrated, and that the Australian community be involved'…It goes on to say that 'Australia's rural community should have a key role in the ecologically sustainable management of Australia's natural resources.

s8 Purposes of the Account

The purposes of the Account are as follows:
(a) the National Vegetation Initiative;
(b) the Murray-Darling 2001 project;
(c) the National Land and Water Resources Audit;
(d) the National Reserve System;
(e) ………..
(f) ……………..
(g) supporting sustainable agriculture;(as defined by s16)
(h) natural resources management (as defined by s 17);
………………………………

The Act goes on to define the following:-
s10 Primary objective of the National Vegetation Initiative

For the purposes of this Act, the primary objective of the National Vegetation Initiative is to reverse the long-term decline in the extent and quality of Australia's native vegetation cover by:
(a) conserving remnant native vegetation; and
(b) conserving Australia's biodiversity; and
(c) restoring, by means of revegetation, the environmental values and productive capacity of Australia's degraded land and water.

s16 Meaning of sustainable agriculture
(1) For the purposes of this Act, "sustainable agriculture means the use of agricultural practices and systems that maintain or improve the following:-
(a) the economic viability of agricultural production;
(b) the social viability and well-being of rural communities;
(c) ………..

s17 Meaning of natural resources management
For the purposes of this Act, natural resources management means:
(a) any activity relating to the management of the use, development or
conservation of one or more of the following natural resources:
(i) soil;
(ii) water;
(iii) vegetation; or

s20 Grant of financial assistance to a person, or a body, other than a State
(1) This section applies if an amount is to be debited from the Account for the purpose of making a grant of financial assistance to a person, or a body, other than a State.

s21 Principles of ecologically sustainable development
(3) For the purposes of this section, the principles of ecologically sustainable development consist of:
(a) the following core objectives:
(i) to enhance individual and community well-being and welfare by following a path of economic development that safeguards the welfare of future generations;
(b) the following guiding principles:
(i) decision-making processes should effectively integrate both long-term and short- term economic, environmental, social and equity considerations;
(ii) ………………
(iv) the need to develop a strong, growing and diversified economy that can enhance the capacity for environmental protection should be recognized;
(vi) cost-effective and flexible measures should be adopted;
(vii) decisions and actions should provide for broad community involvement on issues which affect the community.

If, as stated in the Preamble to this Commonwealth Act, the rural community of Australia should play a key role, and the definitions in the Act appear to support the actions of Mr Glasgow in using vegetation to feed his starving stock, (which incidentally Mr Glasgow replaced immediately), and the actions of Mr Wilson in repairing severe erosion, use of vegetation and soil for the conservation of soil and water it is difficult to understand how they could be prosecuted, fined and had costs imposed on them, all of which was supported by all Australian Courts.

No sensible person would support the destruction of vegetation or any environmental damage. Farmers clear parts of their land to increase the productivity of their land and improve it to feed this nation and support the economy - (refer NHTAA s16 - sustainable agriculture).

The Natural Heritage Trust of Australia Act 1997(C'wth) and all agreement stemming from that Act were to be administered with consultation and community participation.

Any person who wantonly damages our environment for their own personal gain would not be supported by the majority of people in this country.

Unfortunately it appears that these matters must now be taken to England or wherever we have to go including the Hague, to have the common law and our property rights returned to us if nothing we do as a people will cause our governments to reconsider their actions in creating this situation for whatever reason.

If there is no resolution from any of these quarters, then we have lost all equity or value in our land and our common law rights to the ownership of our land.

The majority of persons who take up a parcel of land with a long-term view of making their living off the land and providing food for the people of Australia and overseas and supporting the economy by their toil, do so with the view that they will protect and manage the land productively and viably. Many farmers are on land which has been in their family for generations.

It is a given, and I can only speak for Australia, that people on the land suffer severe hardship and work in creating a sustainable property. Originally farmers in this country had to face and contend with, the unrelenting pressures of nature - drought, fire, flood and wildlife damaging their crops and stock.

Then came the conservationists - with many extremely valuable plans and ideas for protecting the land, native wildlife and vegetation and some plans and ideas based on very 'creative' scientific fact but they, having the backing of the governments - nervous of the next election, created further difficulties for the farmers.

Next came the governments and their public officials with ever more regulations, often to promote the plans and ideas of the conservationists but also with the ever-increasing stream of paperwork to be completed by the farmer, usually at the end of a very long and hard day on the land.

Now, with the administration of the laws and the regulatory approach favoured by most governments, the idea that the bureaucracy has that 'stewardship' of the land is the best way to go, the rural community primarily, but the urban dweller also, have now to face prosecution by public officials and no support from the Courts when prosecuted but face conviction, fines and costs. The definition of 'stewardship' is 'administering the property, house, finances, owned by another'.

People, who have now 'been stripped of virtually all the powers which make ownership of land of any practical utility or value', and the loss of the common law, supported by the recent decision of the High Court of Australia in the applications for special leave to appeal of Mr Glasgow and Mr Wilson, now have another more frightening and very real problem to contend with.

No one has voted in a referendum of the sovereign people in Australia to lose our common law rights to the use and ownership of our land. If the ownership of land now has no 'practical utility or value' should the rural community continue try to make a living off the land or to constantly work to increase its productivity and viability?

Those urban dwellers who own a home and land and often have a large mortgage on that real property have the same dilemma. What will be the reaction of the financial institutions to this situation?

Do the governments of this Commonwealth of Australia still want the farming sector or the ownership of land anywhere in Australia?

Does the Australian economy still rely on primary production as part of its economy?

If the answers to the above two questions is 'no' then surely there should have been at least some consultation with the community and the sovereign people. Ignorance is definitely not bliss in this instance.

ATTENTION - people living in New South Wales.

The matter of Bone v Mothershaw and Burns v the State of Queensland and Croton have already been used by a court of New South Wales in a matter between the State of New South Wales and Peter Spencer to prevent him from using his freehold land in fee simple to its full potential and it appears that the Governor of New South Wales was removed in 1987, therefore New South Wales is in the same situation as Queensland and for the same reasons.

It is believed these actions were carried out without consultation with the people or a referendum. Surely it would be time to have these matters clarified to the people by our Governments prior to the next Federal Election.

In 1999 the majority vote in Australia was not to have a republic but to retain the system of the Crown, the legislature and the Courts.

Grounds of Appeal to High Court of Australia.

These were part of the grounds of appeal presented to the Court of Appeal Queensland and also forwarded to the High Court of Australia.

I request that the Court of Appeal allow natural justice to prevail for me in this
matter as there is no offence for the clearing of native vegetation on private "freehold
land" in either the Vegetation Management Act 1999 or Integrated Planning Act 1997.

(i) I, Keith Ronald Glasgow, the Applicant committed no offence against any law of the Commonwealth, State, Local Government, or at common law. The vegetation clearing offence for which I have been prosecuted, was commenced by the Respondent, Peter Thomas Hall employed as an authorised officer under the Vegetation Management Act 1999 by the Department of Natural Resources.

( ii) The Integrated Planning Act 1997, section 4.3.18(3) shows:- 'However, proceedings may only be brought by the assessing authority for an offence under (a) section 4.3.1, 4.3.2 or 4.3.3 about the Standard Building Regulation; '

(iii) The offence for which I have been charged and convicted and to which I pleaded not guilty could only have been brought before a Magistrates Court by the assessing authority about a Standard Building Regulation.

I have been fined and had costs awarded against me to the total value of$27,559.25 and
I request of the Court of Appeal that all convictions, fines and costs be quashed.

I have recently received a notice from SPER regarding the outstanding fines and costs
awarded against me. That Department has advised that I am required to pay the full fines
and costs to the total of $27,559.25 or carry out community service as ordered until that
amount has been recovered through my labour to the Crown.

i) Community service, is in fact, a deprivation of my liberty by the order of the Court. Therefore the hours that I will be required to serve will be in actual fact, imprisonment for the benefit of the State.

ii) My drivers licence will be suspended and a Warrant issued to take possession of our private property to the value of $27,559.25.

iii) I have been advised by the Clerk of the Court at Biloela that a Warrant has already been issued to the value of that property to cover the fines and costs imposed by the Court in this criminal proceedings.

I, Keith Ronald Glasgow, the Applicant, apply for leave to appeal from the whole of the
judgment of the Queensland Court of Appeal on Appeal No. 273 of 2006, date of judgment 2nd
February 2007. It is submitted that the Court of Appeal erred at law for not granting the
extension of time for leave to appeal by misapplying the principles of law in the case of Bone v
Mothershaw [2002]QCA 120.

The Charge was that I made an assessable development without a permit on Freehold land contrary to Section 4.3.1 (1) of the Integrated Planning Act 1997. No development took place at any time except the standard property management practice of utilising native vegetation in a drought to feed starving stock. Section 16.2 of the National Heritage Trust of Australia Act 1997 establishes that actions of property management are sustainable property management for the purposes of the Act and do not fall under Queensland vegetation management laws.

The Commonwealth of Australia and the State of Queensland have not passed any laws to prevent us from the use of our freehold land for the purposes of sustainable agriculture or to remove the common law right to allow us to continue in our business of sustainable agriculture.

The evidence collected and presented to the Court below as a result of a Warrant sworn before Magistrate T.G.Bradshaw in Rockhampton on 13th January 2003 executed over our property on 15th January 2003 by the Respondent Peter Thomas Hall in the company of Peter Webley is tainted because the Warrant is void ab initio. Evidence given before the Court by the Respondent was as result of satellite information that a ‘clearing offence’ had occurred.

This information was taken from SLATS imagery for a property approximately 17 kilometres distant from our property, known as 'Valentine Plains" which showed the possibility of a clearing offence. Misidentification of the property was carried through onto the Warrant which was issued for the property named as ‘Valentine Plains’. Our property is known as 'Bayfield' and is not the property named in the Warrant. The said Warrant taking its information from the satellite imagery identifies 'a rural property with buildings thereon'. We have no buildings on the property over which the warrant was executed. The persons executing the Warrant could not have failed to notice the difference!

The Respondent and Peter Webley both trespassed on our private property by the alleged execution of the Warrant of Entry under section 33 of the Vegetation Management Act 1999.

Addresses on warrants are matters of strict liability and there is no capacity to transfer Warrants from one named property to another. All evidence obtained from the execution of the Warrant of Entry is tainted and cannot be used in any prosecution against us for our use of the land and natural resources found on that land in our occupation as farmers and graziers. Our lawful use of our land is supported in the Natural Heritage Trust of Australia Act 1997, sections 16; 17; 21 and 54.

Reference is made to George v Rockett [1990] HCA 26; (1990) 170 CLR 104 F.C. 90/026 (20 June 1990).

The Summons does not show the address of the property where the offence occurred. It states that "between 19 September 2000 and 7 August 2001 at Biloela in the Magistrates Court District of Biloela in the said State one KEITH RONALD GLASGOW did start an assessable development namely clearing of remnant vegetation on freehold land without a permit for the development". - Integrated Planning Act 1997 section 4.3.1(1). The land has never been identified as being covered with ‘remnant vegetation’. This is an invention of the Respondent. In fact the alleged offence occurred between September, 2000 and September, 2001 but the Summons was not issued until 26 August, 2003 which was outside the statutory time limit set at 1 year as laid down in section 68 of the Vegetation Management Act

Under Section 3.12.(1) all development is exempt from Development Permits except matters dealt with under Schedules 8 & 9 of the Integrated Planning act. Therefore, I did not require a development application or Permit. The Section under which the charge was laid relates to a clearing provision under operational work which is part of a clearing component of a development.

Reference Queensland Court of Appeal Form 29 - Application for extension of time to appeal page 11 paragraph 41, numbers 10 - 20, included in Outline of Argument dated 24th January 2007 prepared by David J. Walter.

Officers appointed under the Integrated Planning Act 1997 and officers appointed under the Vegetation Management Act 1999 are appointed by 2 different Ministers and their appointments are not interchangeable under the law. The Respondent is not an officer appointed under the Integrated Planning Act 1997 and has no delegated power under the said Act. Reference is made to the cases of : Minister of State for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v. Ah Hin Teoh F.C. No. 95/013 [1995] HCA 20; (1995) 128 ALR 353, (1995) 69 ALJR 423, (1995) EOC 92-696 (extract), (1995) 183 CLR 273 International Law - Immigration (7 April 1995) Refer to Outline of Argument prepared by David J. Walter on 24th January 2007 and presented to the Court of Appeal, Queensland.

My wife, Lesley Kay Glasgow and I are tenants in common of the registered land. The land is held in an estate in fee simple under the provisions of section 47 of the Land Title Act 1994(Qld).

Reference:- Particulars of the property: Current Title Search:
Estate and Land Lot 52 Registered Plan 912769
Estate in Fee Simple County of Pelham Parish of Kroombit
Local Government: Banana Shire

The Deed of Grant was sold under the Land Act 1962(Qld) No. 42 of 62.
Section 5 shows: "Indigenous timber and all other materials, the natural produce of the said land
shall be and are hereby discharged of such reservations".

Despite the statements of the Respondent in court and at other times the lawful rights to the use of my land for sustainable agricultural purposes are upheld under the Land Act 1994 section 508; the Land Title Act 1994 section 200 and 201 and the Property Law Act 1974 sections 19; 20; 21,29, section 57A and under Schedule 6, Dictionary definition of "State land". The actions of the Respondent were in knowing disregard of the State’s property laws and attempted to extinguish my rights by Executive Direction.

The Parliament of the State of Queensland in passing legislation, has ensured that the rights to the use of my freehold land, held in a Deed of Grant under the provisions of the Land Title Act 1994 section 47, have been upheld under the relevant Acts as described.

Refer to Outline of Argument prepared by David J. Walter on 24th January 2007 and presented to the Court of Appeal, Queensland.

The Court of Appeal failed to take consideration of the bilateral agreements, strategies and the multilateral treaty which are the basis of the environmental laws in Australia today and which are set out in chronological order below.

The Intergovernmental Agreement on the Environment was a prelude to the Commonwealth of Australia entering into the multilateral treaty known as the Convention on Biological Diversity signed in Rio de Janeiro.

The Intergovernmental Agreement on the Environment was signed in May 1992 between the Commonwealth, the States, the Chief Ministers of all Territories and the Local Government Association of Australia.

As required under the provisions of the Agreement, the Commonwealth and the State of Queensland (and other States and Territories) framed legislation to implement this Agreement. For Queensland that Act is the National Environment Protection Council (Queensland) Act 1994 and for the Commonwealth the National Environment Protection Council Act 1994 (C'wth).

Reference: Intergovernmental Agreement on the Environment
SCHEDULE 2 - RESOURCE ASSESSMENT, LAND USE DECISIONS AND APPROVAL PROCESSES

5. Within the policy, legislative and administrative framework applying in each State, the use of natural resources and land, remain a matter for the owners of the land or resources, whether they are Government bodies or private persons.

The Intergovernmental Agreement on the Environment is included in the above Acts of the Commonwealth and the State of Queensland. Section 5 of schedule 2 is, under the Acts, a statutory law that ensures that the land and the natural resources are a matter for the owners of the land.

The international Treaty known as the Convention on Biological Diversity which includes Agenda 21, was signed by the Commonwealth Government on behalf of all people of Australia in Rio De Janeiro in June 1992. This is shown in the Australian Treaty Series number 32 of 1993. This Treaty was ratified by Australia on 18th June 1993.

Reference:-
Article 10 - Sustainable use of components of biological diversity
(e) Encourage cooperation between its governmental authorities and its private sector in development methods for sustainable use of biological resources.

At the signing of this multilateral treaty, the Commonwealth of Australia along with leaders of many other nations of the world, ensured that the private sector would not lose their land or the natural resources on that land. The Treaty is to be upheld and encouragement and cooperation should exist between Government authorities, industry and the private sector which includes landowners and leaseholders of land with consultation and partnership. This partnership should not be implemented by immediate prosecution and a removal of my rights as has happened in the criminal proceedings against myself by the Respondent, Peter Thomas Hall, a public official, defined under the Criminal Code Act 1995(C'wth) Chapter 7 - The proper administration of government section 130.1 refers to the definition of property which includes my property as a person in accordance with paragraph 22(1)(a) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901(C'wth). the Respondent Peter Thomas Hall is a Commonwealth 'public official' as described in the Schedule, Criminal Code, Dictionary. His actions are in direct contradiction of the spirit of the treaty signed by the Commonwealth of Australia and members of the United Nations.

One of the most important parts of this Treaty is known as 'Agenda 21: a program for future action'. One of the actions to deal with is "efficient resource use (sustainable use of renewable resources, water, energy, biological diversity, minerals forests and agriculture).

AGENDA 21
Objectives

10.5 The broad objective is to facilitate allocation of land to the uses that provide the greatest sustainable benefits and to promote the transition to a sustainable and integrated management of land resources. In doing so, environmental, social and economic issues should be taken into consideration. Protected areas, private property rights, the rights of indigenous people and their communities and other local communities and the economic role of women in agriculture and rural development, among other issues, should be taken into account.

The 'Australian Implementation Requirements' of the Convention on Biological Diversity were three Acts. One of these was the Natural Heritage Trust of Australia Act 1997 (No. 76 of 1997); Wildlife Protection (Regulation of Exports and Imports) Amendment Act 1995 (No 121 of 1995) and the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (No. 91 of 1999).

The Court of Appeal Queensland failed to uphold the multilateral Treaty and the legislation enacting the Treaty into Australian law passed by the Commonwealth of Australia on behalf of the people of Australia.

Cited: Outline of Argument presented to Court of Appeal 24th January 2007 by D.J. Walter.

In December 1992 the National Strategy for Ecologically Sustainable Development was signed and adopted by the three levels of Government in Australia - Commonwealth, State and Local, at a Heads of Government meeting in December 1992.

At that meeting the Council "noted that the document is intended to play a critical role in setting the scene for the broad changes in direction and approach that governments will take to try to ensure that Australia's future development is ecologically sustainable. The Council agreed that the future development of all relevant policies and programs, particularly those which are national in character, should take place within the framework of the National Strategy for Ecologically Sustainable Development and the Intergovernmental Agreement on the Environment which came into effect in May 1992.

The Integrated Planning Act 1997(Qld) was made subject to the following:-

In the second reading of the Integrated Planning Bill on 30th October
1997 the Hon D.E.McCauley (Callide - Minister for Local
Government and Planning stated:

"The coalition Government has developed the policy setting for the Integrated Planning Bill, taking into account the Intergovernmental Agreement on the Environment and the National Strategy for Ecologically Sustainable Development."......

In the Consolidation of explanatory notes for the Integrated Planning Act 1997 taken from the Office of the Parliamentary Council Legislation web site it shows at page 82 -

The owner of a resource must give their consent before development can proceed. This will include the consent of the land owner and may include State approval to use resources over which it has rights under legislation.

The Intergovernmental Agreement on the Environment had been placed as a Schedule to:-
i) National Environment Protection Council Act 1994 (C'wth)
ii) National Environment Protection Council (Queensland) Act 1994.

The State, as shown on my Deed of Grant, has reservations over my land for minerals and petroleum only. The Land Titles Act has not been amended to repeal or curtail any of the rights assigned to land owners under the legislation. No other Queensland legislation repeals or implies repeal of the above rights.

The Natural Heritage Trust of Australia Act 1997 (C'wth) binds the State of Queensland and its servants such as the Respondent to the Convention on Biological Diversity (and Agenda 21). Sections 16; 17; 21 and 54 of that Act protect the rights to the use of agricultural land. Section 21 of the Act has a notation that:

'The principles of ecologically sustainable development that are set out in this subsection are based on the core objectives and guiding principles that were endorsed by the Council of Australian Governments in December 1992.'

These core objectives and guiding principles are those that were set out in the Intergovernmental Agreement on the Environment and the National Strategy on Ecologically Sustainable Development. The 'core objectives and guiding principles' in both the agreement and the strategy are incorporated into law in the State of Queensland, in this matter the Vegetation Management Act 1999 and the Integrated Planning Act 1997. The Respondent has no legal rights to unilaterally dispose of the Commonwealth legislation and the intergovernmental agreement.

The Australian Government and Queensland signed in November 1997 the Natural Heritage Trust Partnership Agreement. This was the implementation of the Natural Heritage Trust of Australia Act 1997(C'th) and the setting up of the Natural Heritage Trust Account. The Commonwealth placed the sum of $1.35 billion dollars in that Account from the partial sale of Telstra to assist in the protection of the environment for the future. The Respondent has no authority to override Section 16 (2) of the above Act.

The Queensland parliament officially accepted the limitations on interference with sustainable farming practice inherent in the Rio Treaty and its associated legislation. In the Second Reading Speech by the Minister the Hon Rod Welford for the Vegetation Management Bill the Minister mentioned the Natural Heritage Trust Partnership Agreement signed in 1997. This Partnership Agreement is binding on the State and the Commonwealth and is subject to the Natural Heritage Trust of Australia Act 1997(C'wth) which in turn is subject to the International Treaty. The Strategy as described in section 4.3. of the Partnership Agreement is for the 'broadscale tree clearing policy and local tree clearing guidelines for leasehold and Crown land'.

The Vegetation Management Act 1999 was framed taking into account
the Natural Heritage Trust Partnership Agreement and as a consequence the
Natural Heritage Trust of Australia Act 1997(C'th) which is bound to the
International treaty and therefore our rights under law are protected.

I have applied to the Registrar of the Court of Appeal, Brisbane Queensland
for a written judgment from their Honours and they have advised that there
is no written judgment in this proceedings.

Orders sought:-

1: I, the Appellant, Keith Ronald Glasgow, seek the following order from
This Honourable Court.

2: That my conviction under Integrated Planning Act 1997 section 4.3.1(1)
for starting an assessable development without a permit be set aside and
quashed.

3: The fine imposed against me of $10,000.00 be quashed.

4: The all Costs of Court, Miscellaneous Costs, Professional Costs and further costs imposed at Appeal being in total against me be quashed. That all costs be paid by the Respondent

5: This Honourable Court Set Aside the Warrant of Distress held by the Clerk of the Magistrates Court, at Biloela for the sum of $27,559.25 to seize property to that value from myself, the Applicant, Keith Ronald Glasgow for the fines and costs as set out above.

6: The cost incurred by me in this Appeal be paid to be on an indemnity basis.

7: Any other Order that this Honourable Court may deem fit.

Matter pending in the High Court of Australia - for Catherine Elizabeth Burns.

The facts of the matter of Catherine Elizabeth Burns placed before the High Court of Australia in an application for special leave to appeal for resolution. The law has not been included in this document, nor have the questions asked of the High Court.

a) I, Catherine Elizabeth Burns made the application under duress with a threat of being prosecuted and fined if I did not apply to clear native vegetation from my private registered land under IDAS Chapter 3 of the Integrated Planning Act 1997(Qld). I completed, as required, Part A and J of Form 1 Development Application under the IDAS for assessment under the Vegetation Management Act 1999 on 4th July 2002.

b) I paid the sum of $266 for the application fee to the Department of Natural Resources, Atherton Branch. Receipt Number 2693768 refers.

c) As a result of that application, on 27th August 2002 Mr Luke Croton, A/Manager, Vegetation Management and Use, North Region, Department of Natural Resources issued a Decision Notice refusing my application.

d) The Decision Notice was issued under section 3.5.15 of the Integrated Planning Act 1997.
Decision Notice:-

2. Reasons for Refusal
The clearing proposal described by the application does not comply with the State Policy for Vegetation Management on Freehold Land 2000 for the following reasons:-

The application does not meet performance requirement 2 of the code -
Viable networks for wildlife habitat are maintained

1. The Lot is known habitat for the endangered mahogany gliders as well as known general habitat for the endangered cassowary. The Mahogany Glider Recovery Plan 2000 - 2004 has indicated that the greatest threat to this species is lost of habitat."

2. Consideration has also been given to the State Policy for Vegetation Management on Freehold Land (page 9) Performance requirements and acceptable solutions, states "In determining whether a performance requirement will be met, the precautionary principle will be applied".

e) The decision notice issued by Luke Croton under section 3.5.15 of the Integrated Planning Act 1997(Qld) was not in relation to clearing native vegetation on private land, but was under the Decision Stage, section 3.5.1 which is a referral to a building agency (of the State) for an application if required and the decision stage for the application starts on the day after all other stages applying to the application have ended. The decision notice itself is in fact and law, void. I only require an application under the Integrated Planning Act 1997(Qld) for the reconfiguration of a lot or a material change of use. The clearing of the native vegetation is a component part of a development. I clearly did not require any permit.
f) The Decision Notice placed over my private registered land, refusing me the right to clear my land for resale has been upheld by the following Courts of Queensland.
i) Planning and Environment Court Cairns P & E Court No 62 of 2004
ii) Supreme Court Cairns - Burns v State of Queensland & Croton QSC 434
iii) Appeal Court Brisbane - Burns v State of Queensland & Croton QCA 235

3. The common law has been repealed from the Supreme Court Act 1995 (Qld), Reprint No 2, reprinted as in force 2nd March 2001, © State of Queensland 2001, by the omission of:-Part 9 - Div Hdg 4—Common law and jurisdiction; Div Hdg 5—Equitable jurisdiction; Div Hdg 6—Criminal jurisdiction; s199—Laws of England to be applied in the administration of justice; s200—Common law and general jurisdiction of the court-jurisdiction at common law; s201—Equitable jurisdiction; s202—Criminal jurisdiction.

4. The Constitution of Queensland 2001(Qld) Chapter 4 - Courts - section 58 - Supreme Court's superior jurisdiction. The Supreme Courts superior jurisdiction is now of the State.
5. It is quite clear that before it was demanded that I make application for a development approval under the IDAS and pay the fee of $266.00, that the constitutional changes had been made in Queensland, without referendum and that people would only have those changes broadly explained to them. I now no longer have the protection of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, the Sovereign of Australia and Her common law contract in land and equity is now worthless, and the only equity in the land is held by the State corporation.

6. Reference Queensland Government (Land Holding) Act 1992 © The State of
Queensland 1992; Lands Legislation Amendment Act 1992 -Act 64 of 1992 © The State
of Queensland 1992 - reference Schedule 1 - Aboriginal Land Act 1991; Land Act 1962;
Real Property Act 1861; Real Property Act 1877; Real Property Act Amendment Act
1952; Real Property Acts Amendment Act 1956, Torres Strait Islander Land Act 1991

7. My private land, Torres Strait Islander land and native title land is held in the Brigalow Corporation and held under the Land Title Act 1994 © State of Queensland 1994 with a statutory title. To allow the State owned corporation to form, my Deed of Grant was interfered with under the Reprints Act 1992 on the 28th January 1998 with the deletion of the 2nd paragraph of section 40 (1) from the Constitution Act 1867 in reprint No 2.

8. I refer to the Acts Interpretation Act 1954(Qld) © State of Queensland 2006 Reprint No. 14, Reprinted as in force 28th August 2006.

s 36 - Meaning of commonly used words and expressions - In an Act -

'property' means any legal or equitable estate or interest (whether present or future, vested or contingent, or tangible or intangible) in real or personal property of any description (including money), and includes things in action.

'land' includes messuages, tenements and hereditaments, corporeal or incorporeal, of any tenure or description, and whatever may be the interest in the land
'Aborigine' means a person of the Aboriginal race of Australia

'individual' means a natural person

'person' includes an individual and a corporation

'GOC (or government owned corporation)' has the same meaning as in the Government Owned Corporations Act 1993.

'Commonwealth Constitution' means the Constitution of the Commonwealth

9. I refer to the definition of the word 'Aborigine' in section 36 of the Acts Interpretation Act 1954(Qld). Aboriginal people hold their land under the Aboriginal Land Act 1991 and the Torres Strait Islander Land Act 1991 as a traditional group of Aboriginal people holding the native title and Torres Strait Islander land. By the changing of the definition from Aboriginal people to 'a person of the Aboriginal race' that means that a group of traditional owners or a group of aboriginal people no longer hold the title under the Aboriginal Land Act 1991 or the Torres Strait Islander Land Act 1991 as they are now defined, as I am, as a 'person' and in the abovementioned definition a person includes an individual and a corporation.
10. The Commonwealth Constitution is the Constitution commencing at section 9 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act - it shows that it is the Constitution only, not the Act.

11. Under the Lands Legislation Amendment Act No. 64 of 1992 © The State of Queensland and further now in the corporation of the State known as the Brigalow Corporation and further by amendment of the Constitution Act 1867 Reprint 2A which clearly defines that any estate or interest in the land to be acquired from any other person, the definition of land clearly does not include any estate, therefore the only land held has been transferred from the Real Property Acts of 1861; 1877; 1952 and 1956 into the Land Title Act 1994(Qld) Reprint 7 ©State of Queensland 2003 and we hold our land in a statutory title only, without any further element of tenure of the Crown and the Courts are inside the Government and subject to the rules of the Court as found in the Statutory Instruments Act 1992© The State of Queensland.

12. I refer to the decision of Chief Justice de Jersey on 19th November 2004 - page 2 paragraph 5 "these contentions are plainly untenable, Mrs Burns certainly has an indefeasible interest as a registered proprietor of an estate in fee simple". His judgment erred in fact and law by clearly separating the ownership of private land from the Deed of Grant or title through the unrepresentative use of the word “Proprietor” and the lack of legal comprehension of the difference between an Unregistered Executory Interest as defined at s6 of the Land Acquisition Act 1989 (C’wth) in the manner and form of Statutory Instruments and a Registered Interest as defined in the Real Property Act 1900 (NSW) or as the case may be, the Land Title Act 1994 (Qld).

13. My private land that I hold, by definition under the Acts Interpretation Act 1954(Qld) is an undefined interest in the land only as the common law estate in fee simple which I purchased from the Crown, which is an estate of inheritance at common law and which is now the property of the State and if I may say, I myself am a mere chattel of the State because we, as persons, are included in the State's corporations.

14. Further, Chief Justice de Jersey stated that, “the burden is on me, not on my land”.

15. The Supreme Court of Appeal declined to forward this matter to the High Court of Australia as I requested. The Government of Queensland has created, without a referendum an independent sovereign State under the Constitution of Queensland 2001 and the Supreme and District Courts are inside and indefeasible of the Government. There is now no Crown or common law in this State and we, as citizens, no longer have the protection of the Crown or the common law under s80 and s77M of the Judiciary Act 1903(C’wth). An estate of inheritance in land or equity can not and must not, be subject to Statute Law that in effect extinguishes or regulates that same inheritance, completely ignoring s52 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act, for to do so, anarchy and ruin will prevail. For as soon as the financial institutions withdraw because of lack of tenure in the land held of common law, poverty will soon follow.

16. I personally have not voted in any referendum to remove the entrenched provisions as described in the Constitution Act 1867, section 53 - Certain measures to be supported by referendum, described in Reprint 2, reprinted 27th January 1998, section 53(1), section 1, 2, 2A, 11A, 11B, 14; and, section 53(1).

17. The State of Queensland has acquired my land without just compensation. I still
pay rates on my entire acreage. I have taken this proceeding before the abovementioned three Courts of "the State" of Queensland and had my appeals dismissed on all three occasions by virtue of Bone v Mothershaw[2002] QCA 120 - a decision of the Court of Appeal of Queensland. In this decision, the Bench stated that Queensland had 'a plenary power as an independent sovereign State' to make laws regulating my use of my land which effectively has cost me a viable resale value of the land and the loss of approximately twenty four and a half acres of land which is to be left for mahogany glider habitat for, one assumes, the public benefit. The Minister of the Department of Natural Resources and Mines the Honourable Stephen Robertson did advise Mr. Walter in writing, that the State is not required to pay compensation or, for the payment of compulsory acquisition of my private land.

18. The Courts of the State of Queensland upheld the decision of Bone v Mothershaw [2002] QCA120 which states that Queensland is an independent sovereign State and that State is subject to the Constitution of Queensland 2001 assented to on 3rd December 2001. The assent by the Governor was defective as the Governor is inside of Government as a parliamentary secretary and now forms part of the corporate Government of Queensland along with the Supreme and District Courts of the State, and the Planning & Environment Court and the District court are subject to the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules. As the courts are inside the Government it follows that they must protect the assets of the corporation of the State. As my land is now an asset of the State of Queensland and by the definition of 'person' s36 - Meaning of commonly used words and expressions in the Acts Interpretation Act 1954 I am an 'individual and a corporation'.

19. My Deed of Grant in fee simple is now a statutory title only, and that title is upheld by the civil laws of the Supreme and District Courts of the corporate Government of Queensland and the Judges of the Supreme and District Courts who are inside the Government. My common law estate in fee simple is now held by the corporate Government of the Sovereign State of Queensland.
20. Under the definitions in the Acts Interpretation 1954(Qld), section 36, the definition of 'property' and 'land', the State of Queensland now owns all my property, which includes money, real and personal property from the past and any future property which includes my will. I refer to the definition of 'land' under section 22 - Meaning of certain words (aa) 'individual' and (c) 'land' of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901(C'wth) and the definition of 'property' in section 130.1 of the Criminal Code Act 1995(C'wth) The Acts Interpretation Act 1954(Qld) is ultra vires to the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act, Criminal Code Act 1995(C'wth), Chapter 7 - The proper administration of Government; the Acts Interpretation Act 1901(C'wth).

21. My land is now held by the Government of Queensland in the Brigalow Corporation with no compensation paid to me for that acquisition. For “Even though the King may not enter” (Plenty v. Dillon [1991] HCA 5; 171 CLR 635 F.C. 91/004 (7 March 1991) the Queensland Government and the delegated authorities thereof can, without fine.

22. I, the Applicant, Catherine Elizabeth Burns, hold registered land in an estate in fee simple, situated at Lot 6 CP10416, Stony Creek Road, Cardwell Shire.

i) The title reference is 20818084, date created 7th December 1970.

ii) The land, in an estate of fee simple, was purchased at public auction on 22nd August 1968 for the sum of $525.00. The property, held at Lot 6 CP10416, Stony Creek Road, Cardwell Shire was alienated from the Crown lands in the State of Queensland by Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, Sovereign of Australia and the Chief Executive of the Commonwealth of Australia as cited under section 61 of the Constitution of Australia - Executive Power.

iii) The land was alienated from the Crown land in the State of Queensland in accordance with the laws and regulations of the Land Act 1962 - 1968.

iv) My Deed of Grant has been signed by the representative of the Sovereign
of Australia in the State of Queensland, Sir Alan James Mansfield, the Governor 'in and over Our State of Queensland and its Dependencies in the Commonwealth of Australia, at Government House, Brisbane in Queensland'. My Deed of Grant has been sealed with the Seal of the Sovereign of Australia.

v) Her majesty, in accordance with the laws and regulations in the Land Act 1962, section 6(3), reserved the right in the gold, minerals, helium and petroleum, to the Crown.

vi) As required under the Constitution Act 1867(Qld) section 34 the sum of $525.00 was paid into the Treasury of the Crown, thus completing the contract with the Crown.

23. I have in my possession and I will, if required, have Mr David Walter produce my original signed and sealed Deed of Grant to the Court. I hold the Deed of Grant in an estate of inheritance which is a common law contract with Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, the Sovereign of Australia.

24. The Deed of Grant in fee simple is a contract at common law, under the hand of the Sovereign, Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, passing to me a common law estate of inheritance in fee simple. The common law contract has now been broken as a result of my being required to make an application to clear the native vegetation on my land by members of the Department of Natural Resources Mines and Water who advised that the laws pertaining to land ownership had changed in Queensland. All land and equity, my inheritable estate, now have been repossessed by the State of Queensland and I am not entitled to compensation under section 51(xxxi) of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act or pursuant to the Lands Acquisition Act 1989 (C’wth).

25. On 6th September 2003 Mr David John Walter, who is my intervener in this matter and who also holds my full power of attorney in these proceedings wrote on my behalf to the Honourable Peter Beattie, Premier and Minister for Trade at PO Box 185, Brisbane Albert Street, Queensland 4002. I now refer to paragraph 3 of that correspondence.

"Mrs Burns’ property rights on her freehold land have now been removed by the State refusing to allow her to clear the regrowth on her property under the Vegetation Management Act 1999 without offering her compensation. Section 109 of the Australian Constitution shows that if there is inconsistency of laws between the States and the Commonwealth, the laws of the Commonwealth shall prevail and the inconsistency by the State will be invalid. The Commonwealth Acts Interpretation Act 1901 refers. Section 51 (xxxi) of the Constitution shows that with the acquisition of property on just terms from a person, compensation must be paid and this is also shown in the Queensland Legislative Standards Act 1992."

26. The Premier never replied to Mr Walter but on 15th October 2003 the Minister for Natural Resources and Minister for Mines the Honourable Stephen Robertson MP wrote to Mr Walter in reply to his correspondence of 6th September 2003 to the Honourable Peter Beattie.

27. I refer to paragraph 5 and 6 of that correspondence.

"Under the current law, no compensation is payable where an application to clear native vegetation is refused. Applicants may appeal the Decision Notice to refuse an application under the Integrated Planning Act 1997 within the prescribed time.

Information about appeal rights was supplied to the Applicant at the time the decision notice was issued.

Under the State/Commonwealth proposal to phase out broadscale landclearing, a package of financial measures is being negotiated to assist farm businesses affected by the new vegetation management arrangements. Criteria for assistance under the new package are yet to be determined and will focus on assisting landholders disadvantaged by any new measures."

28. (a) I am not a landholder as described under the State Policy for Vegetation Management on Freehold Land or as defined in the Natural Heritage Trust Partnership Agreement which refers to tree clearing on leasehold and Crown land. I am the holder of a common law estate in fee simple and my land is registered under the Real Property Act 1861. In November 1997 the Natural Heritage Trust Partnership Agreement was signed between the Commonwealth and the State of Queensland. This allowed the State of Queensland and all other signatories ie. other States and Territories of the Commonwealth, to have access to funds from the Natural Heritage Trust Account and those funds were the funds of the sovereign people of Australia from the partial sale of Telstra, the sum of $1.35 billion dollars.

Natural Heritage Trust Partnership Agreement
(ii) Roles of Queensland

6.3 Queensland will:
(f) activity on private land will be funded taking into account the amount of public benefit received relative to the private benefit derived from the activity

(iv) BUSHCARE: The National Vegetation Initiative
1. National Goal
To reverse the long-term decline in the quality and extent of Australia's native vegetation cover.

4.3 Strategies:
(a) Finalise and implement the Broadscale Tree Clearing Policy and Local Tree Clearing Guidelines for Leasehold and Crown land ....................

(b) The Mahogany Glider Recovery Plan 2000 - 2004 between the Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service and the Natural Heritage Trust of Australia - helping communities - helping Australia. Approximately $11 million had been paid from the Natural Heritage Trust Funds to landowners in the Hinchinbrook and Cardwell Shires to purchase their properties to secure their land under the Natural Heritage Trust for the protection of the mahogany glider under the Mahogany Glider Recovery Plan. I received no such request to purchase my land under that plan and that plan has been upheld by the Courts of Queensland under the Decision Notice issued by Luke Croton.

The animals (Mahogany Glider) are not found on a protected area – refer Nature Conservation Act 1992(Qld) Reprint 3B © State of Queensland 2003 – to be read in conjunction with Part 4 – protected areas, Part 10 Evidentiary provisions– section 160 – definitions section 7 – animals. The Mahogany Glider Recovery Plan 2000 - 2004, upheld in the Decision Notice, for private land, is subject to the Natural Heritage Trust for compensation for the loss of the use of the land for the environmental public benefit

29. On the 3rd December 2001 the Governor of Queensland with the authority of the entrenched provisions contained in the Constitution Act 1867 (Reprint No.1) and the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act which in their manner and form hold the entrenched provision of , "The Governor of Queensland", and exercising the delegated authority of 'The Crown' did unilaterally 'Assent' to the 'Constitution of Queensland Parliament of Queensland Bill' without the consent of the Peoples' of Queensland through the ultimate and absolute authority gained through a vote of 'Referenda'. In so doing the Constitution of Queensland 2001, as assented, including the manner and form interpreted therein is now and for the time being, as the case may be, the 'Fundamental Law of Queensland'.

30. With respect to the people of Australia and Queensland, the advice received by the Queensland Governor, in council with the Executive Government of Queensland between the dates of 9th November 2001 and 3rd December 2001 was constitutionally ‘defective’. It therefore follows that the ‘assent’ by the Governor of Queensland was also ‘defective’ and is therefore invalid.

31. Reference to the Application to the Court of Appeal, Supreme Court Queensland C of A 526 of 2006 refers dated 19th January 2006 and the Supreme Court of Appeal Queensland 515 of 2004 and further as placed on the High Court File B44 of 2007.
I refer to page 2, line 55 and page 3 line 3.

32. I refer to the following. I purchased my land in good faith from the Sovereign at public auction and that good faith has not been upheld by the public officers of "the State" corporate Government of Queensland. It therefore must bring every common law contract, signed in good faith in the Commonwealth of Australia since Federation, under legal scrutiny as it appears those common law contracts are able to be breached and broken at will, with no lawful authority or compensation and upheld by all Courts of law in the Commonwealth of Australia.

33. I refer to the definition of the word "Parliament" as cited in the Second Reading Speech given by the Premier the Honourable Peter Beattie on 9th November 2001 for the Constitution of Queensland 2001 Bill.
"The entities it provides for include this Parliament, the Supreme and District Courts of this State and the system of local government that we know in Queensland. The office holders under this Act include the Governor of Queensland, the Ministers of the Crown and the judges of the Supreme and District Courts. This law is of supreme importance. "
"Our identity as a Sovereign State, the democratic ideals on which our State is built, rest on our Constitution.

34. The Second Reading Speech was read into Hansard on 9th November 2001 for the Constitution of Queensland 2001 Bill and the Constitution of Queensland 2001was assented to by the Governor on 3rd December 2001. That assent is defective as the Governor is quite clearly an entity of the Government along with the Supreme and District Courts. The Governor, the Supreme and District Courts and the local Government are part of the corporate government of Queensland and all people and any property is the property of the corporation of the State of Queensland.

35. The common law has been abolished in the State of Queensland and by the upholding of the decision of the Queensland Court of Appeal Bone v Mothershaw[2002] QCA120 by the High Court of Australia when dismissing the applications for special leave to appeal of Wilson v Raddatz B14/2007 and Glasgow v Hall B13/2007 on 3rd October 2007 that dismissal effectively fractured the Common Law in Australia and rendered void any and all contracts at Common Law in the Commonwealth of Australia. The Court of Appeal Queensland decisions Gregory Wilson v Warren Neil Raddatz CA 276 of 2006 and Keith Ronald Glasgow v Peter Thomas Hall CA 273 of 2006 were also subject to Bone v Mothershaw. By the upholding of these decisions by the Courts within the Commonwealth, that Queensland is an independent Sovereign State, it is quite clear that Queensland is not a part of the Federation of the Commonwealth as clearly described in the Second Reading Speech of the Premier of Queensland for the Constitution of Queensland 2001 Bill. This leads to a number of problems within the Commonwealth:-

i) The people within Queensland have lost their sovereignty as a person as described in the Preamble of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act and all rights at common law.

ii) A Federal election is about to be called. When the Governor General issues the writs for the sovereign people to vote, as I am no longer recognized as a person with a common law right to the use of my property, that can be taken by the independent sovereign State without compensation against all principles of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act s 128 and common law. How therefore can Queensland be included on that writ for people with no sovereignty to elect members of the Parliament of the Commonwealth when the loss of the common law rights of the people of Queensland and the removal of the Crown in Queensland has been upheld by the highest Court of common law in Australia.

iii) Therefore, any writ issued under the hand of the Governor for people to be elected either into the House of Representatives or the Senate of Australia, cannot involve Queensland as the Government of Queensland has not recognized the Crown in Queensland since 29th January 1999 and under the Constitution of Queensland 2001 the Governor seals all documents under the name of the Sovereign with the Public Seal of the State.

I refer to the comments of Judge White of the Planning and Environment Court in Cairns on 18/3/2004 - Appeal No. 3 of 2003 when I represented Mrs Burns for the first time.

"(State Government Counsel) Mmm. I suppose they could. Well, the Parliament can really, with respect, do anything. It's a?????

HIS HONOUR: I just find this astounding. Soviet Russia would be proud of these laws."

I have correlated these matters in this documents as I believe that the majority of people in this country would be unaware of the actual serious ramifications of these matters. Hopefully the information in this document, based on facts which have been presented to all courts - from the Magistrates and Planning & Environment Courts to the Court of Appeal Queensland of Queensland and on to the High Court of Australia, will make people who read this, more aware and be prepared to act.

This work cannot be done by only a few. It is imperative that the people of Australia who own private land and rural property, in fact any property in this great nation of ours will, quite simply, have to take a stand. If this situation continues there will be little of value left for us to pass to our children and grandchildren. We are becoming completely over regulated by the public officials of this Commonwealth of Australia - please read again Judge White's comment above. That is becoming more applicable every day in this country. Surely it must cease.
If I and others who are assisting me get no support we shall all pay a very great price in the near future.

(David J. Walter) EnviroWild Pty Ltd 13th October 2007

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

As a citizen of the Commonwealth of Australia, protected and administered under the Australian Constitution, I am asking each and every parliamentarian of each state government, why not even one of you have stood forth in your role as a elected Servant of the People, to protect them from this 'theft' of their rights, their possessions and their citizenship.

The following information was passed to me and has given me awful concern for both my family and the families of Australia. I would impress upon you the urgency to read it and have added this information to assist in you making that decision.

I am forwarding this to every person to Australia that I can, the newspapers, television stations, radio stations, and to the United Nations and her Majesty the Queen in London to show and describe how far the rights of the sovereign People of Australia are no longer respected and protected under the Constitution of Australia by our elected representatives in both the States and Federal governments.

In the attached documents, the Governor of Qld was removed from the position of governor, which is the Crown or Separation of Powers, and was placed into the Qld Parliament as a public servant on the 29 January 1999.

This was done by the leader of the National party in Qld, Mr Robb Borbidge by placing a bill on the table of parliament.

Even at that stage the parliament did not have to pass a law or assent to it in the parliament to remove the governor or pass any laws.

All that was necessary was to leave it on table of parliament for a period of 12 months and then under Acts Interpretation Act it automatically picks itself up, reprints itself into a law without parliament even voting!!!!!

I am personally astounded by this. Why then do we even have a parliament if they are not necessary in the process of making laws that affect the People of this country????

Why have the People not been told this????

Why do you politicians condone this ‘theft”????

In 2001, as is clearly described in documents by Mr Walter I have attached and which have been sent to the Governor of Australia, the Prime Minister John Howard, the Opposition Leader Kevin Rudd, and the President of the Senate - the parliament of QLD, passed the Constitution of QLD and the People were broadly told this was possible because the members were democratically elected.

These people were not elected with a mandate to remove the People’s rights, but to protect them and swore an oath to do so.

In doing so, the parliament of QLD took all property, possessions and our land, into the government corporation, the Brigalow Corporation. The people did not at any time vote to have this done.

Shareholders of this corporation are the ministers of the Qld government and the Premier, who now has the vote of veto over our personal and private property . Public servant are now not public servants of the Crown – but of the state!

I refer to words of Judge White in the attached notes, in the matter of defending a 73 year old lady, Mrs Burns “Russia would be proud of these laws.”

To you the governing bodies of Australia I say – “This is not protection of the people – it is theft.”

There is no common law in QLD as it has been removed from the law of Qld and all that remains in civil law. You would be well advised to read all the attached notes, some of you may still have some humanity remaining and will be as shocked as I was.

Do not forget, we are not a civil law country.

The QLD government now owns all that an individual has because the people are now not individuals but individuals and corporations.

This includes both fee simple/private land and aboriginal land – as Mr Walters describes – none own their land any more – it is all held under the Brigalow Corporation of the Government of Qld.

All must do as they are told or suffer the consequences. This is not democracy! How did you all allow this to happen? Or is it part of the planning for all States of Australia?

The Qld government passed this without the People’s vote, bringing both the government, ministers, courts, judges and all judiciary into the Qld government. There is no longer a Separation of Powers.

All public servants are inside the government.

The ex-Premier/President of Qld who swore on oath to protect the Constitution, then stated he “can’t wait to see a republic”, used his new constitutional act to go behind an 84 year old referendum which cancelled the legislative council, then took all the positions out of that legislative council, for the staff he required.

He has now made the People of Qld subject to certain chosen parts of the Australia Act, where he does not recognize the Australian Constitution, although the documentation has misled the People into thinking otherwise. Even the Appeals Court of Qld has upheld this Qld government removal of rights and the disregard of the Australian Constitution.

Yet politicians in every party, in every state most particularly Qld seem to care nothing for this blatant removal of the very basis of this great country.

If Qld does not recognize the Australian Constitution, how then can you have a Writ for an Election?

Qld cannot be in any vote in this election, because the court cases of Bone & Mothershaw (included in the documentation), state that Qld is a sovereign state and can make any laws over land they want, fine and punish each and every individual as they want and no person has the right of recourse to justice in this state. If this is the case, then Qld no longer belongs to the Commonwealth of Australia and can not participate in the Federal election of Australia.

If the People no longer have any rights of ownership over their land, but must obey not only the current laws, but those yet to come, then they have no equity in their land.

If the People have no equity in their land, then the banks also have no equity in the land, and must also suffer the consequences of loans that no longer carry a basis for the money.

In fact, both the People and the banks only own a piece of paper, the actual physical land now resides under the ownership of the Qld Brigalow Corporation.

What monies are being borrowed by this Brigalow Corporation using the land that has been ‘stolen’ from its legitimate owners as collateral?

What will happen when both the People and the banks truly understand this?

Is every State and Federal minister ready for the chaos that will result in an ultimate destruction of the whole financial system of this country?

Will yours be one of the names listed as destroying this country?

When hard working citizens are punished so severely by all the courts in Qld, and by the High Court of Australia, ( see attached notes) then all is lost in this fine country . Fee simple land ownership no longer exists under the corporate structure of governments. The people have had all their rights totally removed.

This country is no longer a democracy but a totalitarian state.

Why should any other state politician concern themselves with QLD, you may ask.

Currently NSW is using both Bone & Mothershaw and the Mrs Burns cases (particularly in rulings in the Peter Spencer cases) to support decisions that indicate they not only support the Qld rulings, but are starting to see themselves as outside the Australian Constitution as well. It also appears that NSW has removed its Governor in some manner as did Qld.

So we in NSW cannot vote either.

Where does this leave Mr Howard and Mr Rudd, who hold seats in the 2 states that are now no longer part of the Commonwealth? And both are leaders of the 2 parties who are participating in this ‘theft’.

And in fact, if all states follow this dangerous path and remove themselves and the People of those states, via this Corporate structure, from the Commonwealth of Australia, then all that is left is to cancel the Federal & State governments, because, ladies and gentlemen – you will no longer exist.

Unless you like to apply for a seat on the corporate board!

As to this pretence of giving the People a vote in the maintenance and protection of both this country and the Constitution via this coming election, I feel completely unable to vote for any party, as none of them have stepped forward in any way to protest this long-developing situation. My vote will be counted as a ‘donkey vote’. I wonder how many more you may expect.

This email will be going forward to every person I am able to reach, they will be asked to do the same. All comments and replies will be collated for forwarding to the International Courts as that may be the People of Australia’s only continuing protection.

Yours as a member of the People under Australian Constitutional Common Law.

Sue & Lindsay Maynes
Berkeley
Woodstock 2793 NSW Australia
02 63451254
sue.maynes @ bigpond.com

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To Her Majesty, The Queen

Your Majesty authorised our Founding Fathers to create a system of government protected and guided by the Australian Constitution 1900 through the Entrenched Provisions.

The People, for whom this Constitution was created, have the responsibility of participating in the vote for the government representatives and ministers who then carry the responsibility of protecting the People’s rights via Constitutional guidelines and Common Law.

In effect, the People must vote into place the Servants of the People.

In Queensland and New South Wales, Common Law has been removed. Government has taken into itself all public servants, the judiciary, including all courts in both states, judges and police, and the construction and administration of all laws, acts and others.

There is now no Separation of Powers in each of those states.

These governments now refer to themselves as Corporations and have included the People as corporations also. The Queensland government, via its removal of all Entrenched Provisions in the QLD Constitution 2001, has declared itself to be a sovereign state, which no longer recognizes the Australian Constitution 1900.

At no stage were the People consulted via a Referendum to agree to any of these circumstances.

Consequently, with a general election looming, we find that this matter has led to the leaders of both the Liberal and Labor parties, both of whom hold seats in Queensland and New South Wales, falsely standing for leadership in country whose Constitutional Act they no longer recognize.

And they are falsely standing for leadership to supposedly protect the rights of the People, from whom they have already removed both their Common Law rights including all personal ownership rights.

This matter has been developing for several decades aided and abetted by both major parties and the relevant Prime Ministers at those times.

Currently we are aware that the Prime Minister Mr John Howard, the Opposition Leader Mr Kevin Rudd and a large majority of the politicians from both their parties understand what is happening.

And it is the People’s opinion that these elected persons are falsifying and destroying the integrity of the voting system.

We ask you, as our Sovereign Majesty of Australia, and your Governor Generals who are your representatives on our behalf, to call a halt to this election process, oversee the reinstatement of correct Constitutional guidelines in this country, re-affirm the Common Law rights of every individual among the People and demand that any current and all future governments return to the honoured process of asking the People for their agreement to any such extraordinary and serious changes via Referendum only.

Respectfully signed by ………………………………………………….
of (address)………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………
Email or fax or Phone No………………………………………………..

Dated …………………….

Take a look at this article/document as well: http://www.loveforlife.com.au/node/2428

----------------------------------------------------

See other Documents

History of Land Ownership Under Common Law | Love for Life: http://www.loveforlife.com.au/node/3284

BREAKING NEWS - Land Ownership Removed From The People of Queensland 3rd October 2007 by the High Court of Australia: http://www.loveforlife.com.au/node/2669

Australian Government Dictators "Officially" Now Own Your Land In Queensland And Soon Other States Of Australia! by Nick Maine: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/4956

Support The Love For Life Campaign, Kindom & The Cristian Family

Supporting The Love For Life Website, The Cristian Family and The Living Dream Of Kindom (Creation Of Do No Harm Communities) - The Love for Life website is produced for free without a fee (no contract or conditions attached) as a gift of love for the benefit of others. If you feel you have gained something from visiting it, feel inspired, and would like to reciprocate as an equal exchange in substance and support (value), you are most welcome to make a gift of love to keep it and the dream of Kindom going. As always, we thank you for your gifts of love.

Additional Options

Bank:
Account name:
BSB:
Account number:
SWIFT BIC Code:
Australia New Zealand Banking Group (ANZ)
Fiona Caroline Cristian
012 547
5576 81376
ANZBAU3M

PAY PAL

Go To Your Pay Pal Account To Send Gifts To action @ loveforlife.com.au
Additional Options

 

The Cristian Family November 2006

We Stand For NO SYSTEM

Kindom (Do No Harm Communities) is the dream for freedom, but it is the dream for the freedom of those around us who also live the dream of freedom, because it is in living for the freedom of others that we get our freedom. When we live for the dreams of Kindom of those around us, we live life as a gift because we live for (dedicate our lives to) their dream of freedom, truth, peace, joy, abundance, etc, just as they live for our Kindom dreams too. This is true co-creation (cooperation) with no attack on the uniqueness of each of us. When we live this way, we have no need for any man-made system - everything/everyone has already been taken care of by our love for life.

Just as we do not have to jump 10 feet across the room to grab our next breath, neither do we have to worry about food, water and shelter because it has all been taken care of as we each co-create Kindoms/Kin-Domains for everyone. Now everybody and everything of the dream of life that is Kindom/Paradise is free (has been set free once again). The issue is greed and selfishness, power and control trips, arrogance, ignorance, being fed many many lies and being traumatised. The issue is not overpopulation - there is more than enough land available for every family to have a hectare (2.5 acres Kin-Domain) to care for. The land of Australia can provide a Kin-Domain for every family across Earth, each with a food forest, clean fresh drinking water and plenty of space for building natural do no harm habitats and with plenty of land left over.

Everyone must have the freedom to take full-responsibility for their lives, for the water they drink, the food they eat and for their shelter. Currently, "The System" forces everyone to give up taking full-responsibility so that we become grown up children accustomed to sucking on the nipples of "The System" corporations for everything, having to use money to get by and to follow the rules of money because we are not co-creating freedom, peace, truth, joy and abundance for each other. Money only leads to haves and have nots and all the abuse, manipulation and distractions that we are subjected to as slaves to money.

When we give up living for other's Kindom dreams, we start creating hell ("The System") all around us because we become self-centred - now it's all about "my freedom","my money", "my land", "my belief", "my saviour", "mine", "mine","mine", "i","i", "i", "own", "own", "own", etc. To protect what we claim we own requires a man-made system with FORCE to protect those self-centred claims. This is ALL trauma based and all story-telling (brainwashing/braindirtying).

NO SYSTEM = KINDOM/DO NO HARM COMMUNITIES
NO SYSTEM = KINDOM/DO NO HARM COMMUNITIES photo Kindom_zpsa6d24e8a.jpg

Our true freedom comes when we set our thoughts of freedom into motion so that we live freedom rather than just talking and thinking about it while we still slave for "The System". Kindom will not happen while we meditate for hours in the bush or do yoga retreats or wait for Jesus or follow the processes of the OPPT (One People's Public Trust now called One People). This is not freedom because we are not living freedom because we are living the story-telling of Jesus or Zeitgeist or The Secret or Thrive or One Earth/Consciousness/People.

Living Kindom is very, very hard work as we set about repairing the damage to MAN/Earth/Nature that we are ALL responsible for but the burden becomes lighter the more of us put our life-energy into the dream of returning Earth to Paradise. Day-after-day, we all have to work our arses off until Kindom is all around us (MAN) once again. This is the price we pay to set each other free on a piece of land (Kin-Domain), so that no one is under the image-power (education/brainwashing/story-telling) of another MAN anymore and so that everyone can have their space of love to create and live their unique, do no harm dreams. This only happens once we have the Kindoms set up so that everyone is provided for.

Once we re-create the food forests, whether on land or in the suburbs, we can re-claim our freedom, breaking the strangle-hold of "The System" because we are no longer reliant on its services and benefits and no longer turning each other into slaves of "The System", cogs in the wheels of "The System" machine. If we don't put the effort in to set everyone and everything free all around us then we still live in HELL ("The System"). The key is to live for everyone else's freedom so that we can have it too.

From Bare Dirt To Abundance
A Year In The Life Of The
Love For Life Food Forest

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
8th February 2013
51 Minutes 46 Seconds
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1sJCcCvZ97A

From Bare Dirt To Abundance Part Two A
5th November 2014
http://youtu.be/TPTPn8tgcPI
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8545

From Bare Dirt To Abundance Part Two B
Coming Shortly

We live for NO SYSTEM. We do not lose anything by not having a man-made system and, in fact, we gain. We gain our freedom and we gain abundance. Let go of the fear.

The Cristian Family November 2006

A Collection Of Various Love For Life Posts
Providing The Big Picture We See

Sequential Order

We ask you to NOT believe anything we say/share and instead use scrutiny like an intense blow torch and go where the logic of truth/sense takes you. This is very, very important. Put everything you believe up to the test of scrutiny to see how it stacks up. If you are true to your heart/senses and go where the logic of truth/sense takes you will find that NO belief, etc, will stand up to the test of scrutiny. They just do not stack up because they are lies/fraud.

After you have watched and read all the material and any questions are left unanswered, send us your landline number and we will use the internet phone as a free unlimited call. We are on Sydney NSW Australia time. Best times for us to chat are between 11.00am and 6.00pm.

It is critical that you fully comprehend Image Power, "Spelling", Trauma, Reaction To Trauma, Curses, Processing Curses, Full-Responsibility/Liability, Limited Liability/Responsibility (passing-the-back), Slavery, Senses/Sense vs Non-Sense/Senses, Re-Presenting Intellectual Property such as but not limited to "Name", Storytelling/Storytellers, Duality, Black-Magic, Belief, Lies, "i", All Seeing "i" (eye), etc..... These themes and others are covered over and over and over again.

If you do not comprehend these insights and are unable to use your senses to sense your way through all the non-sense/non-sensory-images that enslave MAN under their image power (darkness = "The System" = Hell), men and women will remain deeply trapped under a terrible state of trauma. Our intention is to inspire you to remedy by showing you how to move away from reacting to trauma in all its nefarious and devious forms.

IMAGE POWER
Superb Diamond Range Interviewing
Arthur & Fiona Cristian 4th February 2014
http://youtu.be/qFnuuw3kLog
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8501

His-Story/Her-Story (History)
Arthur Cristian - Love For Life
2005-2007 - Re-posted July 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8529

The Dream Of Life Part 6
Under The Spell Of Intellectual Property

Arthur Cristian - 51 Minutes 52 Seconds
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IMK7CkU1ih8

Trauma Induced Fantasy
July 2013 Interview With
Jeanice Barcelo And Arthur & Fiona Cristian
http://youtu.be/CZVj-ddUoZw
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8500

The Dark Side Of The Moon
The Background To "The System"

Arthur & Fiona Cristian Interviewed By
Jahnick Leaunier, The Tru-Mon Show
24th August 2016
Love For Life - 142 Minutes
https://youtu.be/C5TViw1NLr4

Eric Dubay's Flat Earth Is A Cult
The Background To The System Part Two

Arthur & Fiona Cristian Chatting With
Jahnick Leaunier On The Tru-Mon Show
Love For Life - 31st August 2016
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8585
154 Minutes
https://youtu.be/rCPWgEQg-2M

Eclipse Of The Sun - Video (Arthur swears in this video)
The Background To The System Part Three
Arthur & Fiona Cristian Chatting With
Jahnick Leaunier On The Tru-Mon Show
Love For Life - 25th October 2016
https://youtu.be/FMOsOi1kNRc

The "Name" Is The Mark Of The Beast
The Strawman Identifying
Your Slave Status In "The System"

By Arthur Cristian - Love For Life
5th February 2012 - 56 Minutes 25 Seconds
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DdOag66v7uo

The Satanic Craft Of Inculcation In Practice
Fiona's ACT Supreme Court Affidavit Explaining Inculcation & Illumination
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
4th March 2016
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8578

The Spinning Top
Full Bloom Inculcation

Arthur And Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
Facebook Discussions Between The
8th December 2016
And
26th January 2017
Link: http://loveforlife.com.au/content/16/03/04/satanic-craft-inculcation-pra...

The Shit Of Death
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
28th January 2017
Link: http://loveforlife.com.au/content/16/03/04/satanic-craft-inculcation-pra...

The Selfie Of Freakenstein
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
17th March 2017
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8588

Three Sets Of Fiona Cristian Documents Filed With ACAT
Merged Into One Document For Downloading
https://www.scribd.com/document/327370355/Fiona-Cristian-Affidavit-ACT-S...

Fiona Cristian Affidavit
ACT Supreme Court / Court Of Appeal

https://www.scribd.com/doc/316218306/Three-Sets-of-Fiona-Cristian-Docume...

Dancing With Magic (Lies)
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Videos, Articles, Comments
And Pending E-Book
Love Fort Life
September 2015
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8575

Dancing With Magic Part One
Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life
5th September 2015
https://youtu.be/hx7qJ7r2OS4

Dancing With Magic Part Two
Arthur Cristian - Love For Life
12th September 2015
https://youtu.be/b_KuEFdKmnA

Dancing With Magic Part Three
Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life
13th September 2015
https://youtu.be/9pJc1NfnAcI

Dancing With Magic (Lies) Part Four:
Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life
16th September 2015
https://youtu.be/kSVURGwm1Go

Introduction To Kindom Video
By Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life
6th March 2015
https://youtu.be/7SspPm9wRgo

To Be Educated Is To Have No Soul
The System Is Soul Destroying

Frederick Malouf & Michael Tellinger's
Contrived Gifting
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
1st September 2016
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8586

Illumination IS Definition
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
26th to 29th January 2016
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8577

IMAGE POWER
The Nefarious Tactics Used
To Disguise Truth And Distract Us
From Remedy

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
24th January 2014
This post contains many recent Facebook comments
and email replies which collectively provides a big picture
into exposing the deception behind IMAGE POWER.
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8496

The Pull Of E-Motion
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
8th February 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8499

Processing Curses
A Lie Is A Curse
Liars Process Curses

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
26th February 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8503

How The System Is Really Constructed
Bouncing Back Curses Upon Curse Makers
To Stop Harm Forevermore

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
27th February 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8504

Slave To A Name
Parts One, Two, Three, Four,
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
3rd to 6th March 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8505

Educated Slaves
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
20th March 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8506

The Only Path To Freedom
Beware The False Steps

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 2nd April 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8508

Free-Dumb For All
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 5th April 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8510

Revoking The Ego
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 8th April 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8511

How MAN Commits Spiritual Suicide
Arthur Cristian
Love For Life - 3rd April 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8509

How To Detect Intel Operatives Working
For The New World Order Agenda
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 10th April 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8512

How The Psyop Program & Intel Networks
Are Messing With Your Head +
His-Story/Her-Story

Arthur & Fiona Cristian - April 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8513

Godzilla Through The Looking Glass
Destroyed By Name"

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 20th April 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8514

What It's Going To Take
To Co-Create Freedom Forevermore

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 22nd April 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8514

Falling For Fairy Stories
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 24th April 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8514

A Disassociation From The Work
Of Kate of Gaia

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 17th May 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8517

Separating The Wheat From The Chaff
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 22nd May 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8516

Revolution Or Revolution
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 25th May 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8520

Routing Out Psyop Programs
Routs Out Intel Operatives
Exposing Max Igan's Psyop Program

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 31st May 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8524

The Psyop Program Scam
Behind Religion Belief Faith
& Associated Opinion

Arthur Cristian
Love For Life
11th June 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8525

Another Delusion
Arthur Cristian
Love For Life
11th June 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8526

A World Of Words Is A World Of Lies
Arthur Cristian
Love For Life
13th June 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8527

E-MAN
The Name Of The Beast Is MAN

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 9th May 2014
Includes Mountain MAN Arrested
Facebook Discussion About "Name"
Uploaded 25th June 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8528

E-Motion
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 13th August 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8537

Discussion With Brother Gregory
Clearly Demonstrating Christianity
Is Part Of The Problem
And Not The Solution

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
Between the 12th May 2014 and 30th August 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8542

The Psyop Program Behind Free Food
And Permaculture

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
29th October 2014
Facebook Discussion With Unconditional Love Moon
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8544

Head So Strong
Music and Vocals Arthur Cristian
Backing Vocals and Vocal Effects Arthur Cristian & Hannah Wood
Lyrics Fiona and Arthur Cristian
Written during our spare time between Aug & Oct 2014
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OG4UQCTsqwU

The Time Of Trauma That Destroys Us
Arthur Cristian - Love For Life
9th November 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8547

The Most Powerful Video On Spirituality
And Happiness FOR SLAVES
Or
How To Accept Slavery And Be Happy About It

Arthur Cristian - Love For Life
6th August 2014
Facebook Discussion About The Work Of Eckhart Tolle
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8548

What Can We Do What Can We See
Arthur Cristian - Love For Life
A series of Arthur Cristian Facebook
posts and discussions
between 17th and 21st November 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8552

The Misuse Of Love By Intel Networks
To Create Doubt And Uncertainty
With The Intention To Destroy Love
And Therefore Destroy MAN
(True Freedom, Peace, Joy, Abundance And Truth
For Everyone)

By Arthur Cristian - Love For Life
26th November 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8554

The Void Of E-GO That Is Spiritual Suicide
The Justification Of Laziness
That Perpetuates System Creature Comforts
Ensuring Our Fall

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
13th December 2014
Massive Update Occurred 14th Dec 2014 3.10pm Sydney Aust time
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8556

Darkness Visible Part One A, B, C, D
The Freemasonic World In Plain Sight
Decoding George Washington Lithographs

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
14th December 2014
Part One A http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8557
Part One B http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8567
Part One C http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8568
Part One D http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8569

Darkness Visible Part Two
Yin And Yang, Duality, Spiritual Suicide
And Frank O'Collins UCADIA / One Heaven

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
14th December 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8558

Darkness Visible Part Three
How The Word Sausage
Re-Presents The New World Order
Boiling Point & Out To Get Us

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
27th December 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8560

Darkness Visible Part Four
Aleister Crowley - Thelema - OTO
And The Black Magic Psychedelia Of The Intellect

Facebook Discussion
4th to 10th January 2015
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8561

Darkness Visible Part Five
Living MAN Fiona Cristian's Standing
+ Decoding Judeo/Judaism

Fiona Cristian & Arthur Cristian
Love For Life
24th January 2015
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8562

Darkness Visible Part Six
The Many Fingers Of The Hidden Hand Appearing
YouTube Community Flagged A Video
Posted To The ArthurLoveForLife YouTube Channel
As Being "Hate Speech"

Fiona Cristian & Arthur Cristian
Love For Life
4th February 2015
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8563

Darkness Visible Part Seven
The Full Responsibility For Setting
True Freedom For All Into Motion
In Present-Sense Forevermore

Fiona Cristian & Arthur Cristian
Love For Life
10th February 2015
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8564

Who We Really Are Does Not End
At The Surface Of Our Skin

Arthur Cristian & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 22nd February 2015
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8565

Introduction To Kindom Video
By Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life
6th March 2015
https://youtu.be/7SspPm9wRgo

The Rot Parts One, Two, Three
Arthur Cristian
Love For Life
5th June 2015
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8571

"The Good Guys" And The "Bad Guys"
Working Together To Bring In
The New World Order

Arthur Cristian - 18th July 2015
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8572

Can You Spot The Ego?
Where's Wally? Part One

Compilation of Facebook & Youtube
Insight Posts During Aug/Sept 2015
By Arthur Cristian
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8573

Can You Spot The Ego?
Where's Wally? Part Two

Compilation of Facebook & Youtube
Insight Posts During Aug/Sept 2015
By Arthur Cristian
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8576

Dancing With Magic (Lies)
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Videos, Articles, Comments
And Pending E-Book
Love Fort Life
September 2015
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8575

Dancing With Magic Part One
Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life
5th September 2015
https://youtu.be/hx7qJ7r2OS4

Dancing With Magic Part Two
Arthur Cristian - Love For Life
12th September 2015
https://youtu.be/b_KuEFdKmnA

Dancing With Magic Part Three
Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life
13th September 2015
https://youtu.be/9pJc1NfnAcI

Dancing With Magic (Lies) Part Four:
Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life
16th September 2015
https://youtu.be/kSVURGwm1Go

Illumination IS Definition
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
26th to 29th January 2016
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8577

The Satanic Craft Of Inculcation In Practice
Fiona's ACT Supreme Court Affidavit Explaining Inculcation & Illumination
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
4th March 2016
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8578

The Dark Side Of The Moon
The Background To "The System" Part One

Arthur & Fiona Cristian Chatting With
Jahnick Leaunier On The Tru-Mon Show
Love For Life - 24th August 2016
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8583

Eric Dubay's Flat Earth Is A Cult
The Background To The System Part Two

Arthur & Fiona Cristian Chatting With
Jahnick Leaunier On The Tru-Mon Show
Love For Life - 31st August 2016
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8585

To Be Educated Is To Have No Soul
The System Is Soul Destroying
Frederick Malouf & Michael Tellinger's
Contrived Gifting

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
1st September 2016
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8586

New Love For Life Kindom Facebook Group
Started March 2015
https://www.facebook.com/groups/1434747556816918
Includes 63 Minute
Introduction To Kindom Video
https://youtu.be/7SspPm9wRgo
By Arthur & Fiona Cristian
and
Facebook Kindom Group Guidelines
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8566
The Love For Life website home-page provides
the bigger-picture background to the themes
touched on in this video: http://loveforlife.com.au

Crop Circles Are A Massive Hoax
Facebook Discussion On Simon Kawai's Wall
Involving Arthur & Fiona Cristian
31st August 2013
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8470

OPPT & Slavery Through Intellectual Conscription By Deceit
Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life
27th February 2013 onwards...
Part One: http://youtu.be/Qjp_9nlrBao
Part Two: http://youtu.be/tbybeOWZ-Bc
Part Three: http://youtu.be/yOWoxH-HbVw

Water Is The Life Of MANS Consciousness (Breath)
Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life - 8th February 2013
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8350
Part One: http://youtu.be/4ze66_33wxM - 70 Minutes 5 Seconds
Part Two: http://youtu.be/43gIi-sjxJc - 81 Minutes 13 Seconds
Part Three: http://youtu.be/oooY6W63K-M - 70 Minutes 18 Seconds

What Do You Believe On Origins?
Who Said There Was A Beginning?
Who's Truth Do You Accept?
Belief Is A Strange Idea.

Discussion Lyndell, Scott and Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Between March and April 2013
Posted 29th October 2013
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8487

So You Want The Good Bits Of "The System"
But Not The Bad Bits?

By Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 12th August 2013
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8468

Turning Away From The Reflection
Of MANS Looking Glass

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
30th April 2013
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8404

REMEDY

From Bare Dirt To Abundance
A Year In The Life Of The
Love For Life Food Forest

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
8th February 2013
51 Minutes 46 Seconds
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1sJCcCvZ97A

From Bare Dirt To Abundance Part Two
5th November 2014
http://youtu.be/TPTPn8tgcPI
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8545

From Bare Dirt To Abundance Part Three
7th March 2016
60 Minutes
https://youtu.be/SH9i8ZStzWI

Love For Life Food Forest & Native Garden March 2016
Extension Of The Love For Life Food Forest And Establishment
Of A New Native Garden At The Front Of The Rental Property
In East Bowral - 24th October 2015 to Mid February 2016.
15 Minutes
https://youtu.be/y-Uz8HmnSIM

Control The Land
And You Control MAN On The Land
Displace MAN From Land
And You Turn MAN Into Slaves

Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life
April 2011 (Updated 14th September 2011)
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8237

The Divine Spark
Facebook Discussion With Raymond Karczewski
Arthur & Fiona Cristian & Others
2nd October 2013
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8483

Capturing Another MANS Uniqueness
A Facebook Debate With
Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life
And Raymond Karczewski
Starting 13th May 2013
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8414

The Spell Is Broken
Taking The Land To Create Kindom

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
3rd March 2013
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8365

The Steps Of Kindom
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life 2006/2007
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8304

To explore these themes in greater detail go here where you can find links to all our Love For Life comments, articles, debates, discussions, videos, podcasts, etc: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/3385

All the best
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life

Website: http://loveforlife.com.au
Email : action@loveforlife.com.au
Mobile : 0011 61 418 203204 - (0418 203204)
Snail Mail: PO Box 1320 Bowral 2576 NSW Australia
Facebook Arthur Cristian : http://www.facebook.com/arthurcristian
YouTube Arthur Cristian : http://www.youtube.com/ArthurLoveForLife

Register To The Love For Life Mailing List: http://loveforlife.com.au/content/09/05/14/mailing-list

Facebook Group Why Aren't We Free Discussion : http://www.facebook.com/164918753537287
Facebook Group Kindom/Do No Harm Community Discussion : http://www.facebook.com/151811728195925

Links below will kick in when the professionally recorded Love For Life music is released.

SoundCloud : http://soundcloud.com/loveforlife
Nimbit Music : http://www.nimbitmusic.com/loveforlife
Twitter : https://twitter.com/loveforlifemusi
Facebook Music : http://www.facebook.com/loveforlifemusic
YouTube Love For Life Music : http://www.myspace.com/loveforlifemusic
MySpace : http://www.myspace.com/loveforlifemusic
Google + Fiona Cristian : https://plus.google.com/100490175160871610090

Peaceful Transition Through Sacrifice And Service

We feel there is an essential peaceful do no harm transition required to get all of MAN back to standing on MANS feet without reliance upon another MAN for water, food, shelter. As it stands everyone in "The System" are highly dependent and reliant on the "group mind-set" that forms "The System" of slaves providing services and benefits for the emotionally addicted slaves to "The System" (and you can put us in the same basket too). The transition is to get MAN back to relying ONLY on nature without 3rd party interlopers, intermeddlers, interceders getting in the way. The transition is a team effort with the foresight for setting all of MAN free down-the-line so that MAN is no longer dependent on slaves and masters providing services, benefits, privileges and exclusivity while being bound to contracts, rituals, procedures, conditions, rules & regulations which compromises MAN severely.

This transition is all about shifting from limited liability/responsibility to full liability/responsibility. This full responsibility is all about caring for our health, nature all around us, clean uncorrupted (pure) water and food, partner/co-creator, children, shelter, animal-friends in partnership, etc. In "The System", we are already together destroying each other - we have to come together to create peace together so that we can all have peace. We cannot live peacefully when we are islands, not taking full responsibility for the lives of those around us until EVERYONE can take full responsibility for their life, which means that EVERYONE is healed of system trauma. In "The System", we all come together to make slaves of each other - now is the moment to come together to set each other free, to live for each other's freedom, peace, joy and abundance. Once we have set each other free, we are free.

Control The Land
And You Control MAN On The Land
Displace MAN From Land
And You Turn MAN Into Slaves

Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life
April 2011 (Updated 14th September 2011)
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8237

The Spell Is Broken
Taking The Land To Create Kindom

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
3rd March 2013
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8365

"The Steps Of Kindom"
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8304

---------

Once we fix these issues, we or our children or our descendants to come, can start focusing on the even bigger picture of getting back to where our ancestors were, as breatharyan's, before they fell into non-sense images to be enslaved by them.

All the best to you and your family
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life

The Cristian Family November 2006

The Cristian Family Declaration

The Cristian family and The Love for Life Campaign are apolitical, non-religious, non-violent, anti weapons, anti drugs (both pharmaceutical and recreational) and anti any ideology that denies the existence of Do No Harm Communities (Kindoms) and suppresses the uniqueness and freedom of all men, women and children.

The Cristian family and our Love For Life work is unaligned to any big business corporation, intelligence agency, government body, "system" law, "system" think tanks, "system" green or environmental movements, religion, cult, sect, society (fraternity, brotherhood, sisterhood, order, club, etc,) secret or not, hidden agenda, law or sovereignty group, occult, esoteric, New Age or Old Age.

The Cristian family supports and promotes the remedy that brings an everlasting peace, freedom, truth, joy, abundance and do no harm for all of life without causing loss of uniqueness or the need for having slaves and rulers. We are not into following the one in front or being shepherds for sheeple. Most importantly, we take full-responsibility for everything we think, feel and do.

The Cristian family are not Christians.

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life

December 2006

The Cristian Family November 2006

THE CRISTIAN FAMILY PLEDGE

Being of clear brain, heart and intention, we each declare the following to be true:

• We have no intention of ending our own lives.

• We will not tolerate suppression of truth, ideas, freedom, or our work. We stand for freedom of speech.

• We stand together to support others in the expression of truths and freedom to speak out no matter how radical those ideas may seem.

• Standing for freedom takes courage; together we shall be strong in the face of all odds.

• If it is ever claimed that we have committed suicide, encountered an unfortunate accident, died of sickness/disease, disappeared, been institutionalized, or sold out financially or in any other way to self-interested factions, we declare those claims false and fabricated.

• We testify, assert and affirm without reservation, on behalf of all those who have dedicated their lives to the ending of secrecy and the promotion of freedom of thought, ideas and expression that we shall prevail.

• We Do Not Have Multiple Personality Disorders

Arthur Cristian
Fiona Cristian
Jasmin Lily Cristian
Emma Rose Cristian
Frances Hannah Cristian
Xanthe Jane Cristian

15th December 2006 (Edited/Updated 18th September 2011)

The Cristian Family November 2006

Update Regarding The Love For Life
Home Page And Quick User Guide

We are turning the Love for Life Quick User Guide http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6608 into a blog of all the main insights of our work since March 2005, whether through articles, videos, podcasts or discussions/debates.

As we do not have the time to compile everything we have written into a book, as many have suggested we do, compiling all our most important work into one area of the website is a way of providing easy access to this work so those interested are able to fully comprehend the big picture.

Instead of having to find our different articles, videos, etc, in various parts of the website, it will all be accessible here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6608 and here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/3385.

Love For Life Videos

As amateurs and posted in the Quick User Guide below the Facebook links, we're currently creating and posting a series of videos called "The Dream Of Life" which covers the ground of all the Love For Life insights. We plan to have the videos completed by December 31st 2012. Once this is behind us, our intention is to create a 2 hour or so video covering the body of this work. All videos are embedded in the quick user guide http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6608 and uploaded in Arthur's YouTube channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/ArthurLoveForLife.

Love For Life Music

We have started recording songs, with others, that express the themes of Love For Life. They are now being posted on Arthur's YouTube channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/ArthurLoveForLife and are embedded in the quick user guide http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6608. We have over 100 songs to record. A few rough demos have already been used as the soundtrack on the first "Dream of Life" video.

About Us - Love For Life & The Cristian Family

Also, everything we, the Cristian family, have gone through, from bank fraud and the theft of the family home to death threats and attempts on Arthur's life, is documented in the Quick User Guide too. If you, the reader, are prepared to put the effort in, you will comprehend the extent to which we have all been tricked into becoming slaves, giving up our uniqueness and our full-responsibility for life and destroying everything of life to the point where life is in danger of dying out completely. You will also comprehend the remedy to all this chaos; a remedy that requires only love for life and the determination to do what needs to be done. Though our focus is very strongly on the remedy that creates a world of freedom, truth, peace, joy, abundance and Do No Harm for all of life without loss of uniqueness or the need for slaves and rulers, we realise that it is vital to comprehend how to get there and what stops us from getting there. This is why there is so much information on the hows and whys of everything going wrong in the world today. We are not into peddling conspiracy theories, we are into routing out all forms of organised crime.

Saturday 26th November 2011

Arthur and Fiona Cristian
Love For Life

Website: http://loveforlife.com.au
Email: action@loveforlife.com.au
Mobile: 0011 61 418 203204 - (0418 203204)
Facebook Arthur Cristian: http://www.facebook.com/arthurcristian
YouTube Arthur Cristian: http://www.youtube.com/ArthurLoveForLife
SoundCloud: http://soundcloud.com/loveforlife
Nimbit Music: http://www.nimbitmusic.com/loveforlife
Twitter: https://twitter.com/loveforlifemusi
Facebook Music: http://www.facebook.com/loveforlifemusic
Facebook Why Aren't We Free Discussion: http://www.facebook.com/164918753537287
Facebook Do No Harm Community: http://www.facebook.com/151811728195925
YouTube Love For Life Music: http://www.myspace.com/loveforlifemusic
MySpace: http://www.myspace.com/loveforlifemusic
Google + Fiona Cristian: https://plus.google.com/100490175160871610090
Register To The Love For Life Mailing List: http://loveforlife.com.au/content/09/05/14/mailing-list

1. For The Body Of The Love For Life Work by Arthur and Fiona Cristian

Which Unravels The Reasons For The Chaos, Mayhem and Confusion Being Experienced In The World Today, Explains The Need For "Community Immunity" and Responsibility, and Focuses On The Creation Of Kindoms - Do No Harm, Life-Sustainable Communities (As The Remedy That Heals All Mans Woes) - And How We Can Co-Create Them. For Comments, Articles And Discussions, Go Here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/3385 - Also Go Here To See Podcasts And Videos Posted by Arthur & Fiona Cristian: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/7309 - The Information Shared Comes From Inspiration, Intuition, Heartfelt-Logic And Information Gathered From Nature And Many Amazing Men And Women Along The Way. It Is Not Found In Any Books Or Channellings, Or Talked About By "Experts". Go Here To Read A Brief Synopsis Of Why We Started Love For Life: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8182

2. For Information About The Ringing Cedars of Russia Series

go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/1125 and for more on Eco Homes, Villages, Organic and Permaculture Gardening and Life-Sustainability, etc, go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/3641 and here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/1985 and Mikhail Petrovich Shchetinin - Kin's School - Lycee School at Tekos: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/5173

3. For How To Eat A Raw, Living Food Diet,

go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/5068 - LIFE is information. When we distort LIFE and then eat, drink, absorb, think, feel, hear, see, touch, taste, smell and perform these distortions, the information of LIFE, your LIFE, our LIFE, our children's lives, everyone's LIFE, is distorted.

4. To Find A Menu For The Extensive Research Library (over 8,000 items posted embodying over 11,000 documents, pdf's, videos, podcasts, etc)

Which Covers Topics From Health to Chemtrails/Haarp to Brain Control to Archaeology to Astronomy Geocentricity Heliocentricity to Pandemics Bird Flu Swine Flu to Fluoride to Cancer to Free Energy to Global Warming, 9/11, Bali Bombings, Aspartame, MSG, Vaccinations, Aids/HIV, Mercury, New World Order, Satanism, Religions, Cults, Sects, Symbolism, etc, etc, go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/82

5. If You Would Like To Read About The Cristian Family NSW Supreme Court Case

(Macquarie Bank/Perpetual Limited Bank Fraud Condoned By Judges, Registrars, Barristers, Lawyers, Politicians, Public Servants, Bureaucrats, Big Business and Media Representatives - A Crime Syndicate/Terrorist Organisation) Which Prompted The Creation Of This Love For Life Website December 2006, And The Shooting And Torture Of Supporters Who Assisted Us In Reclaiming The Family Home, Joe Bryant And His Wife, Both In Their Late 70's, go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/5 And Read Some Of Our Email Correspondence With Lawyer Paul Kean - Macedone Christie Willis Solari Partners - Miranda Sydney May 17th-June 27th 2006: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/7300

6. For The Stories Of Other Victims Of The System,

go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/australian_stories (If you have a story you would like us to put up, we would love to here from you:
action @ loveforlife.com.au)

7. For Documentation Of Harm Done By The Powers-That-Be And Their Representatives,

Evidence Revealing How Victims Did Not Break The Peace, Caused No Crime or Harm, There Were No Injured Parties. Documenting Incontrovertible Evidence Demonstrating How The Powers That Be (PTB) And Their Lackeys Will Break All The Laws They Are Supposed To Uphold. They Will Kidnap, Intimidate, Terrorise, Rape, Pillage, Plunder And Lie And Take Responsibility For None Of It. All Part Of Their Tactics Of Using Fear And Trauma To Keep Us In Our Place. Relatives Of Those Under Their Radar Are Also Not Safe From Attack And Intimidation. All Starting From A $25 Fine For Not Voting And A $65 Fine For Not Changing A Dog Registration. We Do Not Have Freedom And Can Only Appear To Have Freedom If We Comply. Regardless How Small The Matter The PTB Throw Hundreds Of Thousands Of Dollars Away To Enforce Their Will.... Go Here:
Fiona Cristian Reply To State Debt Recovery Office - Part One to Part Ten - From 17th October 2008 And Still Continuing:
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6319 or
Fiona Cristian Reply To State Debt Recovery Office
Part One: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/5742 - From 17th October 2008
Part Two: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6135 - From 18th December 2008
Part Three: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6295 - From 9th January 2009
Part Four: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6296 - From 14th January 2009
Part Five: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6375 - The Sick Puppy - From 20th February 2009
Part Six: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6390 - Police Officers, Sheriff’s Officers, Tow Truck Driver and State Debt Recovery Office Blatantly Ignore the Law To Rape, Pillage and Plunder The Private Property Of Fiona Cristian - From 11th March 2009
Part Seven: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6445 - Affidavit Of Truth - Letter To The Queen + Australia: Fascism is Corporatism - From 30th March 2009
Part Eight: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6652 - The Pirates Auction And The Ghost Of VSL386 - From 4th April 2009
Part Nine: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/7073 - Arthur Cristian's Letter To Pru Goward MP - From 15th December 2009
Part Ten: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/7500 - Should We Be In Fear Of Those Who Claim To Protect Us? "Roman Cult" Canon Law - Ecclesiastical Deed Poll - The Work Of Frank O'Collins - From 13th October 2010

8. If You Are Interested In Information On Freedom From Statutes, Rule-Of-Law, Free Man/Free Woman, Strawman, "Person" and Admiralty Law (The Law Of Commerce),

go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/895 - For Common Law, Democracy, Constitution, Trial By Jury, Fee Simple, etc, go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/category/main/law-articles-documents

9. If You Are Interested In Banking and Money Created (Fiat/Credit/Debt/Mortgage/Loan/Overdraft etc) Out-Of-Thin-Air, How Banks Counterfeit Money,

go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/banks

10. For A List Of All The Latest Posts In The Love For Life Website,

go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/tracker

11. For Links To Many Hundreds Of Videos, DVDs And Podcasts

go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/video_dvd

12. To See The Cristian Family Pledge, Legal and other Disclaimers

go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/content/06/12/05/love-life-legal-disclaimer

13. To Read About How A Representative Of The NSW Jewish Board Of Deputies Had Threatened To Shut Down The Love For Life Website

go here: Part One: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6616 Part Two: THE STEVE JOHNSON REPORT AND VIDEO: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6665 and Part Three: Latest Update On James Von Brunn: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6673

Conscious Love Always
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
action @ loveforlife.com.au
www.loveforlife.com.au
0418 203204 (int: 0011 61 418 203204)
PO Box 1320 Bowral 2576 NSW Australia

Arthur Cristian

Create Your Badge

Love For Life Discussions - Why Aren't We Free? How Can We Be Free?

Promote your Page too

The Cristian Family November 2006

Love For Life Legal Disclaimer

The information contained on this world wide web site (the web site and all information herein shall be collectively referred to as "Web Site Information"), under the registered url name, loveforlife.com.au, resides on a host server environment in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15203, United States of America.

The Web Site Information has been prepared to provide general information only and is not intended to constitute or be construed as providing substantive professional advice or opinion on any facts or circumstances. Transmission of the information is not intended to create, nor does its receipt give rise to, a professional-client relationship between 'Love for Life' and the receiver.

While every care has been taken to ensure the accuracy and timeliness of the information prepared and/or reported on this site, 'Love for Life' is not responsible for any errors or omissions or for the Web Site Information not being up to date. The Web Site Information may not reflect the most current developments.

The impact of the law, policy and/or procedure for any particular situation depends on a variety of factors; therefore, readers should not act upon any Web Site Information without seeking professional advice. 'Love for Life' is not responsible for any action taken in reliance on any Web Site Information herein.

'Love for Life' is not responsible for any action you or others take which relies on information in this website and/or responses thereto. 'Love for Life' disclaim all responsibility and liability for loss or damage suffered by any person relying, directly or indirectly, on the Web Site Information, including in relation to negligence or any other default.

'Love for Life' does not warrant, represent or hold out that any Web Site Information will not cause damage, or is free from any computer virus, defect(s) or error(s). 'Love for Life' is not liable to users for any loss or damage however caused resulting from the use of material found on its web site.

'Love for Life' does not necessarily endorse or approve of any Web Site Information linked to and contained on other web sites linked herein and makes no warranties or representations regarding the merchantability or fitness for purpose, accuracy and quality, of any such information.

The sending of information by you, and the receipt of it by 'Love for Life', is not intended to, and does not, create a professional-client relationship.

All Web Site Information is considered correct at the time of the web site's most recent revision.

ADDITIONAL DISCLAIMER

THE CRISTIAN FAMILY SUPPORTS
FREEDOM OF SPEECH - FREEDOM OF THOUGHT

The Cristian Family November 2006

Posted Wednesday 17th June 2009
Updated September 2011

NSW Jewish Board Of Deputies
Has Threatened To Shut Down
The Love For Life Website

No Freedom Of Speech - No Freedom Of Thought

Love For Life does not support harm doing in any shape or form. However, we are supporters of free speech and post articles, documentaries, etc, that represent a wide cross section of ideas. See the Love For Life extensive research library where over 6000 documents, articles and videos are posted: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/82. We clearly see the evidence of the destruction to MAN and the earth that has been caused by ALL religions over the centuries and are therefore not supporters of religions, cults, sects or any group that demands conformity of thought, speech or action, or has rules, regulations or rituals that must be followed. Religions, nationalities and cultural "identities" are formed as a result of the brainwashing we receive from childhood. They are part of the tactics the Establishment uses to keep us all divided from one another and fighting one another.

All religions promote discrimination and division, leading to hatred and even violence and murder. None of them have yet to produce a remedy to all the suffering, poverty, unhappiness and discrimination in the world. If any religion truly had the remedy to all the suffering on earth, there would no longer be any suffering. What have Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, Judaism, atheism and the New Age done to end the suffering in the world?

Since December 2006, there have been many attempts to take down the Love For Life website. Any attempts have been thwarted by Love For Life supporters inundating the harm-doers with emails, etc, objecting to them taking down the website for a variety of reasons. The trouble makers usually back off when they realise that they can post all their views, arguments, beliefs, etc, in the Love For Life website without censorship or restriction imposed. They get to see that even the Queen, Pope, Prime Minister, President of America, etc, can post all their views without hindrance or sabotage and that we support freedom of speech/thought which means we support the right of all sides to express their views.

Of note, there is a vast amount of information posted in the Love For Life website which we do not agree with but we leave it all up because we refuse to be biased, opinionated or self-centered/self-serving. Of the many thousands of comments posted over the years we have only removed posts containing secret links to commercial advertisements, terrible foul language, threats of violence and death, etc, and attacks on other people's characters that avoid the subject/debate at hand. Besides links to advertisements, we have taken down less than six comments due to the above. We usually leave everything up, all warts and all, even those posts threatening to do terrible things to Fiona, our children, our dogs, our friends, family & supporters, etc.

The Love For Life website has information from all sides on many subjects, whether about Islam, Judaism, Christianity, Law, health, psychology, mind control, vaccination, aspartame, MSG, Chemtrails etc. There are over 11,000 articles, documentaries etc on the website and they are so diverse that we are sure that everyone would be able to find something they loved and something they hated, if they took the time to search. If we removed all the articles hated by everyone, there would probably be nothing left! We are not anti anyone but freedom of speech is freedom of speech and no one should condemn the work of another without taking the time to research the subject themselves. Yes, there are articles by those who have a less-than-rosy-viewpoint of Judaism, but there are also articles on the dark side of Tibetan Buddhism (and it is very dark) for those who are interested in the truth: Tibet - Buddhism - Dalai Lama: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6271 Should the authors of these articles be abused and imprisoned for daring to challenge the widely conceived reputation of Buddhism as being the religion of peace and love and that of the Dalai Lama as a saint, or should those interested be allowed to study the work and come to their own conclusions? The same applies to all the articles, documentaries, etc, about Christianity, Islam, Freemasonry, New World Order, etc.

The Love for Life website also shows how the Rule of Law, the Bar, the Government, the Monarchy, the system of commerce, the local, national and multi/trans-national private corporations, all the courses and careers on offer from our universities, all the educators, scientists, academics and experts, the aristocrats and the Establishment bloodlines have also done NOTHING to end the suffering in the world. The website maps the insanity of a world where there is no help for those in need, just as there was no help available for us when we were victims of terrible bank fraud: "NSW Supreme Court Case - Macquarie Bank/Perpetual Limited vs Fiona Cristian - Victims Of Bank Fraud Condoned By Judges" http://loveforlife.com.au/node/5 (orchestrated, condoned and protected by an international crime syndicate/terrorist organisation of judges, barristers, registrars, lawyers, politicians, banksters, big business representatives, media moguls and other lackeys who, all together, put up a wall of silence despite our trying many, many avenues. After the family home was stolen and business destroyed we were left close to poverty and destitution caring for 4 young daughters. Three years later not much has changed regardless of all our efforts. Where were all the followers of all the religions to help us? Or do we have to be members of those religions to receive help from others involved in them?

The New South Wales Jewish Board of Deputies accused us of being anti - Jewish, see: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6616 and http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6665 because we had posted an excerpt from James von Brun's book: Kill the Best Gentiles: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6054 in which he blames Jews for the problems of the world. Obviously this is not our view because of what we have stated above. We do not hate anyone, whatever religion they follow. We are always open to talk to any religious leader or politician and meet with any judge, member of the Bar, experts, academics, educators etc to share the remedy we offer that heals all the divisions between MAN and MAN, and MAN and the EARTH.

Today, a representative of the New South Wales Jewish Board of Deputies is threatening to close the website down, because they have decided it is anti - Jewish and that we promote racism. What has the New South Wales Jewish Board of Deputies done to end the suffering in the world? Can they show that they are concerned with the suffering of ALL men, women and children AND ARE SEEN TO BE DOING SOMETHING ABOUT IT or are they only concerned with Jewish affairs? If so, they, along with all the other religions that only care for their own, are part of the problem, not part of the solution. The man who rang Arthur today was only concerned with Jewish affairs; he was not interested in our intentions or in anybody else, just as most Christians, Muslims, Sikhs, Catholics, etc, are only interested in their own. While we separate ourselves into groups, dividing ourselves from others with rules, regulations, rituals, procedures and conditions, we will never solve our problems.

No matter what we in the Western World Civilisation of Commerce have been promised by our politicians, religious leaders, scientists, educators, philosophers, etc, for the past two hundred years, all we have seen is ever-increasing destruction of men, women and children and the earth. None of the so-called experts and leaders we have been taught to rely on are coming up with a solution and none of them are taking full-responsibility for the fact that they can't handle the problem. All religious books talk about end times full of destruction and suffering but why do we have to follow this program when there is an alternative to hatred, mayhem and death? Why are our leaders following the program of destruction and death rather than exploring the alternatives? It seems that any mainstream politician, priest or academic are only interested in supporting the RULES OF THE DIVIDE, that maintain the haves and the have nots. For 200+ years, 99% of the world population have been so trained to pass on their responsibility for themselves, others and the earth, that the 1% of the population that make up the leaders of the rest of us are making all the decisions leading to the destruction of all of us and the earth. Let's not forget the education system that brainwashes the 99% of the population that we are free and have equal rights while, in fact, we are feathering the nests of those at the top.

At the root of all our problems is self-centredness, an unwillingness nurtured by the Establishment that keeps us concerned only with our own needs rather than the needs of others around us and the Earth. Instead of creating and releasing acts of love for those around us as gifts to benefit them and the earth, we take, take and take, until there is nothing left. The whole point of the Love for Life website is to show people the root of all our problems and to share the remedy. The extensive research library is there to attract browsers and to provide access to information not available through mainstream channels. If the New South Wales Jewish Board of Deputies can, after careful examination of our work, prove that anything we are saying is wrong, we will be happy to accept their proof. If they cannot, and they are still insistent on closing the website down, they will be showing themselves to be traitors to MAN because they are not interested in pursuing any avenue that can end the suffering in the world.

All religions, corporations and organisations that support and maintain the Western World Civilisation of Commerce are part of the problem because our civilisation is a world of haves and have nots, racism, violence, hatred, poverty, sickness, discrimination, abuse, starvation, homelessness, corruption, collusion, vindictiveness, social unrest, arrogance, ignorance, fear, war and chaos. While we support civilisation, we support death and destruction because ALL civilisations that have ever existed are apocalyptic by design.

If we truly want peace on earth and freedom for all, we have to let go of all that which keeps us divided, and come together as MAN, conscious living co-creators of creation. The Love For Life website offers a remedy to the problems we all face in the form of DO NO HARM COMMUNITIES: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/3641 For more details see here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6511 and here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/3385 - We also highly recommend that everyone read the brilliant Russian books called The Ringing Cedars: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/1125 - The Love For Life Website Homepage also provides lots of inspiring remedy based information: http://loveforlife.com.au - If you want to be kept up to date with our work please register to the Love For Life Mailing List here: http://loveforlife.com.au/content/09/05/14/mailing-list. We usually send two postings per month. Presently (September 2011) there are over 7000 registrations reaching over 500,000 readers across Earth. The website now (September 2011) receives up to 12 million hits per month. Since December 2006, over 100 million people have visited the Love For Life website.

Conscious Love Always
Arthur and Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
17th June 2009

The Cristian Family November 2006

Clarification Regarding Our Intentions
Behind The Use Of Donations

The Love For Life website is offered for free without a fee and without any conditions attached. If people are inspired to donate money, then we accept their gift and have provided an avenue for them to support the work we do through Fiona's Paypal or ANZ bank account http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8515. There is no obligation whatsoever to donate and all are equally welcome to our work and to our "time", whether they donate or not. Over the last 9 years, all the Love For Life work has been put out for free and it has often been donations from supporters that have enabled us to renew the domain name, etc, to keep the website going. While some complain that we have an avenue for donations, others complained when we didn't! Either use it or don't - the choice is yours.

Since Love For Life started March 2005 and website December 2006, Arthur has worked 16 hours a day, 7 days a week unpaid for much of this period, putting together the website and sharing insights to wake people up to what has been done to them, whether through the 11,500+ individual articles, videos, podcasts, debates, discussions, pdf's, research documents, etc, found amongst the 8,500+ posts, as well as helping many, many men and women over the phone, and through email, website correspondence, Facebook and YouTube, and creating the Love For Life food forest vege garden and Love For Life music recording studio. This is our life is a gift commitment to serve MAN/Nature/Earth but we are still severely compromised by "The System" and still have to give to Caesar what is claimed to belong to Caesar, which is where the donations help us.

Fiona & Arthur Cristian
Love For Life
21st July 2014