Love for Life

Dear Randy,

The “nut” is you. And the problem with nuts like you is that they fabricate lies, torture people to get false confessions, stage acts of terrorism to create wars in which they commit mass murder and war crimes (so far 650,000 Iraqis and 50,000 Afghans) for profits and plunder and get very very rich in the name of ????? take your pick.

Please check http://groups.google.com/group/total_truth_sciences/topics/ for more real news posts

February 9, 2007 at 07:05:29

9/11: If I knew nothing else about it, I'd know this.

by Jay Esbe

http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_jay_esbe_070208_9_2f11_3a_if_i_k...

Theories abound. And really, why shouldn't they. What else could possibly be expected when this government, this President, blocked the creation of the commission to investigate the biggest mass murder in American history. And what else could possibly be expected when this President then hand-picked the commission members after losing his battle for "silence"? And then there was the "mission statement" of the commission itself, or rather, the NON-mission statement: "Our purpose is not to assign RESPONSIBILITY for the attacks". This, by the DIRECTIVE of the President AS A CONDITION FOR THE CREATION OF THE COMMISSION.

I want to leave aside all the thermite, the too small holes in the pentagon, even the incredible "failures" or NORAD and the "mysterious" change of command structure by the Vice President. I want to leave aside for now, everything we suspect. It's a mountain, and whether you think the mountain smells like bullshit or not, it's far too big to just go away. No, what I want to talk about is not what we suspect, but WHAT WE KNOW. What we already have learned is a fact, and facts, beyond any reasonable doubt or further arguments, lest those who doubt expose their own patent dishonesty immediately.

The 9/11 Solution

The big clue everyone missed

Press the play button to start the video

How the key 9/11 myths were implanted

Two major 9/11 anomalies have been thoroughly documented, specifically:

1) The stand down of US air defense on the morning of 9/11 that permitted commercial jet aircraft to fly erratically and in restricted air space without challenge

2) Overwhelming physical evidence that World Trade Center buildings #1, #2, and #7 were brought down by controlled demolition

A third significant anomaly has not been discussed, let alone acknowledged: the reporting by the major US TV news networks in the first hours few hours immediately after the attacks.

Specifically:

1. MSNBC presented an elaborately detailed story about the lifestyle and anti-US philosophy of Osama bin Laden - while both towers were still burning and long before Bin Laden had been accused by anyone.

2. Fox News featured a "man in the street" eye witness who explained in strangely formal language the science behind why the towers collapsed when most engineers and firemen were utterly baffled and in shock by what had just taken place.

3. CBS featured a Bush administration insider (and not identified as such) as a guest who actively worked to dissuade Dan Rather (and viewers) from speculating that there must have been explosive charges placed in the buildings for them to have collapsed the way they did.

How was it that these stories - based on no fact, no research and no inquirry - appeared in full blown form so quickly on US news networks and then became part of the core myths of what happened on 9/11?

Were these stories prepared in advance?

There's an old intelligence saying that "once is happenstance, twice is coincidence, but three times is enemy action."

Because most of these clips ran only once and were not repeated after they'd done their job, it made it difficult, if not impossible, for viewers to analyze them critically.

Now, thanks to the magic of video tape and a few people who immediately started taping the news after the attacks, we have this important evidence that at the very least these attacks appear to have been anticipated and prepared for by forces that have the ability to exert strong influence over the output of the newsrooms of major US news networks.

http://www.infowars.com/articles/sept11/nypd_officer_heard_building_7_bo...

NYPD Officer Heard Building 7 Bombs
"The whole time you're hearing boom, boom, boom, boom, boom. I think I know an explosion when I hear it"

Prison Planet | February 10, 2007
Paul Joseph Watson

Following our reports this week about three different ground zero rescue workers who all testified that they were told Building 7 was to be brought down, yet more revealing testimony has come to light - this time from a former NYPD officer and first responder, who states that he clearly heard bombs tear down Building 7 as he ran away from its collapse.

NYPD officer Craig Bartmer awoke on 9/11 to images of the World Trade Center burning. Knowing colleagues who worked inside the towers, he immediately headed for ground zero to help with the rescue efforts. He is now suffering from respiratory illnesses as a result of the toxic dust inhaled at the site. Bartmer was in the immediate vicinity of Building 7 before its collapse at approximately 5:20pm.

It is worthwhile to watch the entire 27 minute video interview below (conducted by Dylan Avery of Loose Change ) but in the context of this article, Bartmer's comments on the subject of Building 7 alone are transcribed after the jump.

BARTMER: "I was real close to Building 7 when it fell down... That didn't sound like just a building falling down to me while I was running away from it. There's a lot of eyewitness testimony down there of hearing explosions. I didn't see any reason for that building to fall down the way it did -- and a lot of guys should be saying the same thing. I don't know what the fear is coming out and talking about it? I don't know -- but it's the truth."

RESOURCES:

More Ground Zero Heroes On The Record: Building 7 Was Deliberately Brought Down

Ground Zero EMT: We Were Told Building 7 Was to Be "Pulled"

Silverstein Answers WTC Building 7 Charges

New WTC Complex Photos Highlight Bizarre Building 7 Collapse

Extended version of interview w/ Controlled Demo Expert Danny Jowenko confirming that Building 7 was brought down on purpose

NIST To Probe Whether WTC 7 Downed By Bombs

Close-Up of WTC-7 Collapse Footage Shows Unmistakable Demolition Charges

Silverstein, FDNY Decided to 'Pull WTC 7': An In-Depth Analysis

BARTMER: "I walked around it (Building 7). I saw a hole. I didn't see a hole bad enough to knock a building down, though. Yeah there was definitely fire in the building, but I didn't hear any... I didn't hear any creaking, or... I didn't hear any indication that it was going to come down. And all of a sudden the radios exploded and everyone started screaming 'get away, get away, get away from it!'... It was at that moment... I looked up, and it was nothing I would ever imagine seeing in my life. The thing started pealing in on itself... Somebody grabbed my shoulder and I started running, and the shit's hitting the ground behind me, and the whole time you're hearing "boom, boom, boom, boom, boom." I think I know an explosion when I hear it... Yeah it had some damage to it, but nothing like what they're saying... Nothing to account for what we saw... I am shocked at the story we've heard about it to be quite honest."

Later in the film, Bartmer highlights the possibility that the attack was run from Building 7, as former German technology minister Andreas von Buelow has also postulated , and that it was then demolished to destroy the evidence.

BARTMER: "If the means and the motive are they where would they pull it off from? The Office of Emergency Management was in Building 7. That was a hardened bunker built to withstand just about anything that New York would face. That building had a lot of important shit in it and there was enough stuff in that building to bury evidence on other fronts - financial records, government records. There's no way that that just fell down on its own, I don't believe it."

TOOLS:

Printer Friendly Version

Click here for an MP3 audio clip of Bartmer's statements.

Elsewhere in the interview Bartmer states his incredulity at how fast the Building 7 site was cleaned up compared to the rest of ground zero. He dismisses the 9/11 commission report as a farce and demands a new real investigation.

The criminals who perpetrated and covered up 9/11 have a growing problem on their hands in that the very heroes who led the rescue efforts are now dying as a result of the government's lie in telling them ground zero air was safe to breath e in the days after the attack.

The fact that the authorities were deceptive in the very hours and days after the event itself has led many who were there to question every other facet of the official story.

It is important to stress that everywhere we turn there are statements from firemen, NYPD officials, EMT's and others who were involved in the rescue efforts attesting to the fact that Building 7 was brought down deliberately and that bombs were heard in all three buildings. During the five year anniversary protests at ground zero, a plethora of firemen and police echoed similar sentiments but few are prepared to go on the record. However, the fact that they and many of their friends are now dying in large numbers as a result of government deception is encouraging more to come forward.

The Internet leader in activist media - Prison Planet.tv . Thousands of special reports, videos, MP3's, interviews, conferences, speeches, events, documentary films, books and more - all for just 15 cents a day! Click here to subscribe!

http://www.infowars.com/articles/sept11/wtc_7_deliberately_downed_more_g...

More Ground Zero Heroes On The Record: Building 7 Was Deliberately Brought Down
Testimony of multiple rescue personnel that they were told Building 7 was going to be imploded means FEMA, NIST, Silverstein Properties and federal government all lied, revelations demand immediate grand jury inquiry into insurance fraud, vindicates call for new independent 9/11 investigation

Prison Planet | February 9, 2007
Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones

Two more ground zero emergency rescue personnel are on the record as stating they were told Building 7 was going to be brought down on 9/11 hours before its symmetrical implosion, completely contradicting the official explanation of accidental collapse.

The new revelations provoke urgent questions about how a building was rigged with explosives within hours when such a process normally takes weeks or months and why the decision was taken to demolish the building amidst the chaos of the situation on that day.

RELATED:

Printer Friendly Version

Yesterday we reported on the testimony of an anonymous EMT named Mike who told Loose Change producer Dylan Avery that hundreds of emergency rescue personnel were told over bullhorns that Building 7, a 47 story skyscraper adjacent the twin towers that was not hit by a plane yet imploded symmetrically later in the afternoon on 9/11, was about to be "pulled" and that a 20 second radio countdown preceded its collapse.

Shortly after this article was released we uncovered more astounding testimony of ground zero rescue workers who are fully public and on the record in repeating the same claims, that Building 7 was brought down deliberately and that its collapse was not accidental as the government claims.

Indira Singh was a volunteer civilian Emergency Medical Technician at the World Trade Center on September 11th. She was a Senior Consultant for JP Morgan Chase in Information Technology and Risk Management. Singh was responsible for setting up triage sites for the seriously injured and walking wounded. These sites were closed down and consolidated one by one as the day wore on. Appearing on the Pacifica show Guns and Butter , Singh describes her experience to host Bonnie Faulkner. Click here to listen with commentary by Alex Jones.

SINGH: "After midday on 9/11 we had to evacuate that because they told us Building 7 was coming down. If you had been there, not being able to see very much just flames everywhere and smoke - it is entirely possible - I do believe that they brought Building 7 down because I heard that they were going to bring it down because it was unstable because of the collateral damage. That I don't know I can't attest to the validity of that all I can attest to is that by noon or one o'clock they told us we need to move from that triage site up to Pace University a little further away because Building 7 was going to come down or be brought down."

HOST: "Did they actually use the word "brought down" and who was it that was telling you this?"

SINGH: "The fire department. And they did use the words 'we're gonna have to bring it down' and for us there observing the nature of the devastation it made total sense to us that this was indeed a possibility, given the subsequent controversy over it I don't know."

As is discussed elsewhere in this article, the feasibility and logic of bringing the building down on 9/11 is up for debate, but what is not debatable is the fact that Silverstein Properties, NIST, FEMA and the federal government have all knowingly lied in claiming in official reports that the building came down solely as a result of damage from the towers and that the collapse of the building was not aided by means of intentionally placed explosives.

The following video from CNN clearly shows firefighters and police telling the public to get back because Building 7 was about to come down and in the words of the cameraman was about to "blow up."

Former Air Force Special Operations for Search and Rescue, Kevin McPadden traveled to ground zero completely of his own accord and spent the next four days searching through the rubble and nearby buildings for survivors.

On September 9 2006, McPadden told an audience at the Community Church in New York City how while he was stationed in a Red Cross operations center, he was told that Building 7 was going to be brought down. Click here for the audio.

McPADDEN: "They said you know you've got to stay behind this line because they're thinking about taking this building down, they're not sure if it's stable or not, so they were holding a line off because they had knowledge that something was gonna happen. Well, they pushed us back a little bit....a couple of minutes later they started coming down....people started coming back out to the street, I watched five New York City buses jam packed with people wanting to do search and rescue head down there towards Building 7 - people walk out into the middle of the street to see these people off, like bon voyage and right then Building 7 came down."

McPadden then describes the scene as a "stampede" as people ran over each other in their attempts to flee.

The testimony of these individuals meshes with others in confirming that Building 7 was deliberately brought down on the day of 9/11, a fact that eviscerates official investigations into Building 7 as nothing more than part of an orchestrated cover-up.

In February of 2002 Silverstein Properties won $861 million from Industrial Risk Insurers to rebuild on the site of WTC 7. Silverstein Properties' estimated investment in WTC 7 was $386 million. This building's collapse alone resulted in a payout of nearly $500 million, based on the contention that it was an unforeseen accidental event.

The Internet leader in activist media - Prison Planet.tv . Thousands of special reports, videos, MP3's, interviews, conferences, speeches, events, documentary films, books and more - all for just 15 cents a day! Click here to subscribe!

A cursory insight into professional building demolition tells us that experts are required to spend weeks and months planning the demolition of any building, ensuring that the explosives are placed in exactly the right spots, that the collapse will not impact surrounding buildings, and that a myriad of sufficient safety procedures are followed.

To imagine that demolition experts could rig such a huge building amidst the chaos of the day, unsure of whether further attacks were coming, in a matter of hours and bring the building down neatly in its own footprint without afflicting major damage to adjacent buildings is beyond belief.

Even if one entertains the notion that this is within the realm of possibility, the fact is that the federal government, FEMA and NIST and Silverstein Properties are all knowingly lying in claiming that the building collapsed by accident as a result of burning debris from the twin towers.

Now it is established that they lied about Building 7, how can we trust their often changing explanations of the collapse of the twin towers, especially considering the dozens and dozens of eyewitnesses who have gone on the record to report the fact that explosives were seen and heard on all levels of both towers, including underground?

We are being asked to put our faith in either the federal government, who deliberately lied about 9/11 in the very days after the attack in telling emergency workers and firemen that the toxic air was safe to breathe , or the emergency workers and other rescue heroes who risked their lives and are still suffering the consequences of their actions.

This testimony demands an immediate grand jury inquiry into both monolithic insurance fraud, potential manslaughter, and a complete re-appraisal and re-investigation into everything else that happened on 9/11 in an effort to discover what else the government lied about concerning the events of that day and its aftermath.

"TerrorStorm is something that should be seen by everyone, no matter what their stance/affiliation/political bent. " - Rich Rosell, Digitally Obsessed UK
Get TerrorStorm on DVD today

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From:
Date: Feb 15, 2007 2:30 PM
Subject: RE: Conspiracy> Fwd: September 11 Attacks: Why is the real truth a"foreign" subj

http://www.focusnz.com/tractsforfree/VaticanAssassins.pdf

FULL DISCLOSURE.
http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/85.html
THE PERPS?
http://www.brasscheck.com/videos/cia/cia3.html
PLANS MADE IN ADVANCE -
http://www.brasschecktv.com /page/85.html
MORE PLANS LAID IN ADVANCE - starting in ITALY on Sept '01 - and NOW IN
COURT.
http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/news/news-italy-usa-kidnap .html?_r=1&oref=slogin
MORE EVIDENCE.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3gKv-6bivqo

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: On Behalf Of Roger Rancourt
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 11:15 PM
Subject: Conspiracy> Fwd: September 11 Attacks: Why is the real truth a"foreign" subject?

What do the ignorant have in common with the "RANDY MOTTS" of the cointelpro crowd?

http://www.cloakanddagger.de/shows/webcast/_French/CLOAK_SHOP%20TALK%20F...

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Randy M Mott <>
Date: Feb 15, 2007 1:20 AM
Subject: Re: September 11 Attacks: Why is the real truth a "foreign" subject?

Now we have the Arch Duke of Moonbats!

9-11 "Truth Seekers" are the biggest bunch of liars and losers on the planet. Look at my recent post on the George Bush breakfast meeting on 9-11 with a Bin Laden family member! What a total lack of integrity and accuracy for them to characterize the real event in the fashion that all of the 9-11 wingnut websites do. Look at their lies about WTC7 - "undamaged" - duh! Anyone who cared about the truth can get the Fire Department assessments and full photographs that show the damaged side of the building, not the undamaged side that the "Truth Seekers" always use. Why do they lie? If truth is the objective, where its a commitment to the facts?

ZIPPO!!!!

Randy

-- Original Message -----

From: AJ Scogin

To: Roger Rancourt ;

Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 8:16 AM

Subject: Re: September 11 Attacks: Why is the real truth a "foreign" subject?

Roger Rancourt <> wrote:

Ladies and Gentelmen,

We all know that Israelis were involved in September, 11 2001 attacks on the World Trade Centers. We all know there was an inside job.

Yet six years later, there has still been no discussion in these "9-11 truth groups" about the complete names, motives, and objectives that were played out here with the September 11th attacks.

We still to this day, see people vaguely refer to Larry Silverstein, some Zionists, satanic "illuminatis", or other such nonsense as who pulled off the greatest crime the world has ever seen.

"WHY?"

Should be the ultimate question on everyone's minds. "WHY" can't the nine eleven truth movement as a whole, get beyond the simple accusations, and start naming the perpetrators who did this and even bring them to justice?

The "nine eleven" truth movement has become a complete walking formula for a sideshow.

If it can name and directly implicate through accusations and innuendo, it should be able to "somehow" care enough to catch the perpetrators.

But Doctor Stephen Jones, James Fetzer, and countless others only talk "science" and "logic" of points of debate that are already established.

That there was "explosives" of some sort. And they keep referring to this over and over again, and the story does not change? And then they vaguely refer to the same shadowy groups or agents.

But what if the Nine Eleven "Truth" Movement is simply being steered to "IGNORE" the truth? What if Stephen Jones, James Fetzer, "Scholars for 911 Truth" and countless others are actually VAGUE on purpose?

What if Wayne Madsen and many others are duped by this, into being vague and cryptic too?

I invite you to consider just that, because there is some names that are never brought up in these 911 "Truth" conferences. Names that everyone knows, yet does not identify.

And perhaps if anyone is covering something up, it is those who refuse to look at these names and outright refuses to mention them in the Conference.

Edmund A. Walsh....Where was this man the morning of September 11 2001?

Rudy Giuliani....Where exactly was he sitting at?

Reinhard Gehlen.....Why is no one able to name where this man was during the magic show?

Who does Paul Wolfowitz work for?

" Although it is hard to nab the real infiltrators of the 9/11 movement, Jones should be asked some tough questions, as should others in the Scholars for Truth group since this group is just one of the groups trying to lead public opinion and debate about 9/11.

Furthermore, it should be noted that in a court of law or in testimony before a citizens' Grand Jury, Jones is only a very small piece in solving the 9/11 puzzle, as his testimony would only be limited to an expert witness in regards to the free-fall nature of the Twin Towers, establishing that jet fuel was not the real reason the Towers fell while establishing that this element of the government story is untrue.

But despite his minimal importance in a legal sense, his public posture and influence has been huge. And again he will be allowed to speak at the upcoming 9/11 conference this month in Arizona, a speech that has been heard over and over again in the last year while others with a new and vibrant message will again be left off the podium.

The Arctic Beacon asks why researcher Rick Seigal is not speaking, as well as other researchers like Eric Jon Phelps, who could present an interesting case on who really caused 9/11?

It should be noted that it is also time to stray away from the hard evidence establishing a 9/11 cover-up warranting a new investigation, but serious debate should also begin about who are the real perpetrators of 9/11.

For example, in the past speculation has been pointed at the Bush administration, the Zionists/Mossad, the Illuminati elite and banksters and the Muslim terrorists.

However, conveniently left out of the debate in large 9/11 Conferences around the country, including Chicago and the upcoming Arizona conference, is the fact that the Vatican and Jesuit Order may have had a big hand in the planning of 9/11 as a way to begin the Pope's final 'Crusade of Extermination' against Christians, Muslims and Jews.

If we are only in the speculation stage of getting at the true 9/11 culprits after five long years, then the question must be asked why have the so-called experts and 9/11 truth seekers and speakers in these conferences never bothered to speculate about Vatican involvement.

What are they afraid of? What are they hiding? And is the bad side or the good side really controlling the public debate about 9/11.

" Zagami stated he had personal knowledge that the Jesuit Order (Jesuit Gen. Fr. Pete Hans Kolvenbach), the Gladio intelligence pysops group, Licio Gelli (former Masonic P2 leader in Italy and good friend of Ronald Reagan, Commandant Giorgio Hugo Balestrieri (now the head of the New York Rotary Club) and former NY Mayor Rudy Giuliani, as well as NY Cardinal Eagan, all had prior knowledge and were instrumental in planning and carrying out 9/11.

Here is what Zagami recently said about Balestrieri:

"Giorgio Hugo Balestrieri, ATTIVO 907 P2 LODGE, now a proud American citizen!

"Check for yourself on the internet and you will be surprised to see one of the present New York Rotary Club Directors registered as a member of the infamous P2 Lodge, and if you bring your research a bit further you will also find is involvement with the illegal arms trade in the port of Livorno in the 70's!

"So Welcome to the International Service Division of the Rotary Club of New York's Newsletter for proud satanic slaves and Directors of the New World Order

"Here is a recent Newsletter sent out by Balestrieri:

Welcoming Note and Listing of Articles:

The International Service Division of the Rotary Club of New York is delighted to present this newsletter in order to demonstrate the commitment and continuing support of Rotary to the United Nations and its Millennium Development Goals. This newsletter will also serve as a platform for information and dialogue between all Rotarians who are interested in the programs of the United Nations and in contributing towards achieving its goals. We invite you to share your experiences from collaboration in projects between Rotary and the United Nations. Also, all Rotarians are invited to attend the NY Rotary International Breakfast Meetings which are scheduled on the third Wednesday of every month and held at the German House located at 871 United Nations Plaza (49th St. and First Ave). These meeting provide an opportunity for Rotarians to stay informed regarding United Nation programs and to exchange views on related topics with UN officials and representatives of its member states.

Yours in Rotary Service

Com.te Dott. Giorgio H. Balestrieri

Chairman, International Service Division

Director, The Rotary Club of New York

PS: Dont mention GLADIO please ..

Zagami added:

"Americans need to investigate deeply the names I mentioned (above) and you will find out who really caused 9/11," said Zagami Tuesday on Greg Szymanski's radio show, The Investigative Journal on the Republic Broadcasting Network at www.rbnlive.com

"Balestrieri, who now has American citizenship, is a key link between the Vatican, Jesuit Order and the U.S. government in many illegal activities, including 9/11 and illegal arms dealing. He has much experience in pysops operations, heading up the sales of arms in the 1970's from the Italian port of Livorno.

"He now heads up the New York Rotary Club, which I call the robbery club, and is connected with Giuliani, Bush and the others, as well as helping the Vatican and Jesuit Order with the upcoming Pope's Crusade.

"Americans, wake-up! I know these people, including Gelli and others, were all involved in planning 9/11 because I heard it myself. This is what should be discussed in your 9/11 conferences, but I know they are sending agents controlled by the Vatican to keep this discussion off the table.

And Zagami makes a good point. Why isn't the Vatican ever discussed in connection with being involved in causing 9/11? Why? Perhaps because someone is paying people to make sure the connection isn't made!

Lastly, ask why at the end of the day when the Arizona conference is completed why Vatican speculation is left out? Better yet, ask why the "bigshots' of the 9/11 movement (and you know who they are) leave the Vatican story completely out of the picture?"

http://www.arcticbeacon.com/14-Feb-2007.html

Exactly what the world should be asking!!!!! Who runs Israel, and the Criminal Sabbateans that control Israel?

http://cloakanddagger.de/media/Chamish/murderrama.htm

Israel and the others were involved soley for a reason and all of them strangely have positions in the Rotary Club!!!!! Leo Zagami is coming out and out and naming who was involved, including Livorno and Edmund Walsh.

Yet nobody is paying attention to that.....because the entire 9-11 truth movement dares not ever bring up "INVOLVEMENT" of the Church!!

Indeed in every church, you will find that there is an intentional coverup of September 11!

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5730251808212460790&q=Jesuit

Watch the video for yourselves and see the eyewitness testimony. The same "Judeo Masonic" powers behind world government, are deliberately spoiling and rotting the 9-11 truth movement!

Read what this person has to say, and refuse to dismiss the thought. Yes the Church is behind a one world order movement.

"February 13, 2007 3. Or can a religion that claims an exclusive God be a religion? Well, of course it can be a religion, just not a universal one.

By its own definition it is a religion for the "chosen people," i.e. the elites, whom it self-defines as being restricted to its own members. In fact, research published in 2001 in the journal Human Immunology demonstrated that there were no discernible genetic differences between Sephardic Jews and Palestinian Muslims, that they were truly all brothers and sisters. This article was met with derision by groups such as the ADL, which demanded that all copies of the journal containing the article be destroyed. From the Guardian newspaper in the UK, 25 November 2001: "A keynote research paper showing that Middle Eastern Jews and Palestinians are genetically almost identical has been pulled from a leading journal. Academics who have already received copies of Human Immunology have been urged to rip out the offending pages and throw them away. Such a drastic act of self-censorship is unprecedented in research publishing and has created widespread disquiet, generating fears that it may involve the suppression of scientific work that questions Biblical dogma."

"'I have authored several hundred scientific papers, some for Nature and Science, and this has never happened to me before,' said the article's lead author, Spanish geneticist Professor Antonio Arnaiz-Villena, of Complutense University in Madrid. 'I am stunned.' The article has been removed from Human Immunology's website, while letters have been written to libraries and universities throughout the world asking them to ignore or 'preferably to physically remove the relevant pages'. Arnaiz-Villena has been sacked from the journal's editorial board."

4. Could it be that Judaism is a really a secret society like Freemasonry where the members don't know the hidden agenda, which is in fact expressed by Communism?

Esoteric, Talmudic and Cabalistic Judaism certainly constitutes a society of secrets, and one of immense temporal power. And these secrets are hardly open, by and large. Quite the contrary. Indeed, the Kohanim, the rabbinate who are held to be direct descendants of Aaron, the brother of Moses, and considered a privileged elite within Judaism. Contrary to the aggressive suppression of the study showing Sephardic Jews and Palestinian Muslims to be genetically indistinguishable, a recent study which claims to demonstrate that the Kohanim are genetically distinct from the rest of Jews, published by Karl Skorecki of the Medical faculty at Technion University in Haifa, Israel, has been lauded in the Jewish press worldwide.

5. Although many religious Jews were anti Communist, Schoonmaker's information suggests there may be an affinity between Talmudic Judaism and pagan satanic Communism.

One need only look into the magical practices of the Talmudic Rabbinate, its litany of curses for one's enemies, the obligatory prayers on Yom Kippur to lie, cheat, and steal from the goyim in the coming year, the historical use of the "cosmic 8-ball" or "loaded dice" or "New Age crystals" of the Urim wa Thummim to pretend to know God's will, in order to see that this religion in its esoteric form is exclusive, exploitative, and predatory, its secrets so kept to protect the temporal and occult power (whether real or imagined) and wealth of the privileged few. How terribly similar it is to the Luciferian inversion of exoteric Monotheism that is the occult doctrine of higher order freemasonry. Indeed, the latter grew out of the former, beginning with the Knights Templar and Knights Hospitallier living on the Temple Mount during the Crusades and learning the Cabalistic practices.

6. My working assumption is that the London-based Judeo Masonic banking cabal sponsored the Bolsheviks and is behind the NWO. Communism was part of a grand dialectical process by which "life in the United States ... can be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union...

This analysis seems reasonably self-evident at the present time. And there are rafts and reams of documentary evidence to substantiate your conclusions. The only thing I would dispute is that this merger can be, or is being, conducted "comfortably." It has been a long, hard slog, and they ain't succeeded yet. Though, clearly, the aim seems to be to marginally raise the standard of living of some of the world's poor, where that would be politically expedient, to kill the rest of them off, and to drastically lower the standards of living of the middle class throughout the world, creating one vast underclass out of a reduced population, this to be lorded over by the luciferian and satanic Cabalist bankers and industrialists.

The mass of hoodwinked humanity, the labor force at large, constitutes the ground on which sits a hierarchical pyramid with blissfully unaware Rotarians and Lions, CYO, YM/YWCA and YM/YWHA members at the very bottom (spying on their neighbors in the future, if not already, no doubt), followed by mostly God-fearing "porch" masons of the lower three degrees, and related organizations such as Hillel. The higher ranks of masonry are more and more filled by Luciferians or Satanists, though not all, and at the highest ranks they are practicing Cabalists, following the directions and designs of their masters and comrades, such as B'nai Br'th, with tighter and tighter networks and rankings above such as the Council on Foreign Relations and the World Economic Forum, the Bohemian Club and its grove, the Trilateral Commision, the Bilderbergers, the Pilgrim Society, Skull and Bones, et cetera. Of course any one person may be a member of many, even all, of these intersecting, internested and incestuous organizations. And while some such as Skull & Bones, P2, or the Knights of Malta have exclusive portals of entry, such as being a Yale student, or a Catholic (though that didn't keep Henry Kissinger from becoming a Knight of Malta), others have more varied openings for membership into the world of omerta, the blood vow of silence.

Who is at, or at least near, the top? The Rothschilds? The Queen of England? The Rockefellers? The Bushes? Juan Carlos of Spain? The Pope? The "Council of Thirteen", with one empty seat for its master, the lord of darkness?

And what will happen in the future? Will they spawn the Antichrist? A Memorex Messiah? Intentional Armageddon to try to bring about the ultimate in Cabalistic Chaos out of which their vaunted New World Order, a draconian police state, a Malthusian panopticon prison planet, will emerge like a venomous viper pinning us all against the wall?

Or will the people revolt, and pin these � well, not mofo's, because they are in fact a group containing many pederasts up against the wall once and for all? Time will tell."

"February 12, 2007 Two days ago, three common thieves robbed a woman�s car, and asked her to leave, saying "Jump off, your whore!" and she tried do de-attach the safety belt from her 6 year old son ... but she couldn�t. In the confusion the boy stayed outside the car but the belt did not released. He was dragged for 7 kilometers until they hit a wall. The guys are arrested, but the boy is dead.

When asked by a jornalist "And... If the boy was your son?"
He replied: "I Have no son."

The boys family is outraged. As everybody here n Brazil. Rio de Janeiro is living a social war. At one side drug dealers recruiting young boys who dont have access to good schools and jobs, and the other the society are organizing itself in militias. The government troops are caught in the crossfire"
http://savethemales.ca http://biblesearchers.com/christian/vatican/Benedict%20XVI.shtml

Who is in "CONTROL" of the Rotary Club and these other groups except none other than the Committee of 300? Does the Church control the Committee of 300? Why do they never discuss those facts at a 911 "conference"? Shouldn't we be doing that? If the Jesuits run the New World Order, then it is they and their church who hired the Zionists and Muslims to attack and forment the Wars and Immigration. http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/committeof300.htm

We never hear any of these facts brought up in a single 9-11 speakers conference or "investigation"...

Everything is laid out in black and white: http://cloakanddagger.de/shows/_archives/Phelps/cloak_phelps%209_16.mp3

Roger http://www.fija.org