Lynton Freeman - 1997 - Queensland - National Australia Bank

Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly versionSend to friendSend to friend

Lynton Freeman was a grazier, with a 10,000 hectare property out of Gladstone, Queensland. In 1992, Freeman borrowed $540,000 from the NAB on a property that the bank valued at $2m, consolidating debt previously owed to other lenders. Freeman had been improving the property for ten years and had recently managed a divorce settlement. Over the next few years he borrowed another $400,000 to finance improvements and herd expansion, especially breeders, all with the Bank’s support.

A long drought had him successfully gain a subsidy from the Queensland Rural Adjustment Authority annually from 1994 to 1996 (applicable to early 1997). To get this subsidy, the client has to undergo a review that satisfies the Authority that the client is long-term viable. Freeman passed this test. The program had a five year orientation.

In July 1996, Freeman’s NAB branch acquired a new manager, Mr. ‘Birch’. In his first credit report in August, Birch upped Freeman’s interest rate another .75% above the base rate and demanded that Freeman reduce his overdraft by $30,000 by November 1996, to claw back previous extensions of his overdraft limit.

Freeman pointed out that, if Birch would do the bank’s contribution to the annual review for the QRAA subsidy, the subsidy would reduce his overdraft for 1997 significantly below the reduction desired.

Birch’s October 1996 budget was cavalier on cattle sales, and didn’t include the potential subsidy, or the additional expected income from mining rights and timber sales. This inaccurate budget became the fulcrum for Freeman’s later treatment.

Freeman put together a QRAA application in early 1997 with assistance from a Department of Primary Industry consultant. There were delays with the bank signing and returning the application. The QRAA belatedly approved the subsidy (worth $54,550) in April, pending the bank’s formal review.

Birch then reported to superiors as if the QRAA approval had not taken place (NAB document D1-57, 10 June 1997). In essence, the bank demanded a reduction of debt by $30,000 and, at the same time, refused to accept $54,550 from the QRAA. Birch never completed the review and Freeman never received his subsidy. In a letter of July 1998 to Liz Cunningham, the State Member (Independent) for Gladstone, the bank denied knowledge of the favourable QRAA report.

Freeman’s accounts were moved to the Asset Structuring Unit in June 1997. In November his facilities were not renewed and he was forced into mediation.

Bank-farmer mediation was established with Queensland Farmer’s Federation assistance in 1996, with the presumption of enhancing the rights of the borrower. In practice, mediation has acted to enhance the substantial asymmetry of the bank-customer relationship.

Freeman’s four facilities were consolidated into one commercial accommodation bill. This amalgamation of accounts facilitated the bankruptcy process in due course. Freeman never received closing statements for these facilities. Freeman was instructed that he had until early April to refinance or suffer foreclosure. As no other institution will offer finance under these circumstances, the pain is merely prolonged.

There appears to have been internal differences in the bank hierarchy over Freeman’s treatment. In early March 1998 he was made a verbal offer by the Brisbane Asset Structuring Unit that the bank would accept repayment of half of the debt.

To satisfy this new arrangement, Freeman paid in $2205 as partial interest payment. However, Freeman was defaulted anyway. The $2205 was put into a suspense account and not credited to Freeman for another 36 days. The diversion of the payment facilitated demand, which was issued on April 20th.

The bank then devalued Freeman’s securities. In 1992 Freeman’s property had a market value in the NAB’s books of $2m. In 1996, it was down to $1.75m, but no documents have been discovered to explain the downgrading. Security schedule documents were not discovered by the bank during litigation, including schedules for Freeman’s stock. Freeman’s bank file documentation recorded the market value of his mixed herd of livestock at $578,000 as at 17 March 1995.

On 14 April 1998, market value was put at $1.4m., and another $600,000 arbitrarily knocked off for the ‘effects of mining involvement and Freeman’s possible effect on price’ (NAB document, D1-48). Market value of stock was not included. Freeman’s 1996 Statement of Position, accepted by the bank, estimated his net surplus at $2.067m. (D1-80, 9 May 1996). With receivership expenses, Freeman’s net worth had been reduced from an approximate $2m. surplus to a deficiency of $250,000 at several strokes of the pen.

The NAB took Freeman to the Queensland Supreme Court for possession of the property, gaining assent in October 2000 (QSC 295). The judgment relied upon a draconian caveat in the mediation deed that released the Bank from any claims against it to that date. Judge Ambrose inconsistently touched casually on Freeman’s claims, only to conclude that one could hardly countenance claims against ‘bank officers of their experience and holding the offices that they did’ (National Australia Bank v Freeman, 2000: par.94).

Freeman would not win prizes for social graces, antithetical to sympathy from an impatient loans officer or a status-conscious judiciary. But bank lending is not supposed to be determined on personality and refinement.

Freeman had made losses but was financing his interest bill and bank charges. His debt at worst was marginally outside ‘Category A’, the Bank’s own classification for low risk. If the QRAA subsidy had been received by the bank and reduced indebtedness as proposed, liabilities would have then attracted a ‘Category A’ classification. The Bank’s documents had recorded the property sound and Freeman competent, and the QRAA had judged him long-term viable.

The property, inaccurately advertised, was sold in May 2001 for $770,000 (net of selling costs).

Freeman appealed the Supreme Court judgment but the Court of Appeal rejected Freeman’s appeal in December 2001 (QCA 473). Judge White declined (as per the trial court proceedings) to consider Freeman’s substantive complaints. Affidavits incorporating relevant evidence were not admitted into the hearing.

The Bank filed for bankruptcy in January 2001, based on the spurious asset deficiency. The bankruptcy petition was granted on 12 March 2002 (FCA 244). The judgment is not particularly coherent. Judge Spender deliberated on whether to look behind the Supreme Court decision, citing precedents that legitimise this option, and then declined to take this route. The matter of the existence of a debt is integrally tied up with the nature of the valuation of the property and the sale by the receiver. The Judge cited precedents that the law treats the receiver as the agent of the mortgagor (the borrower), but declined to follow the logic of the argument to infer that the Bank had interfered with this agency.

The thrust of Freeman’s judicial experience is that, after myriad Court hearings, his complaints against the Bank have never been given a proper airing. The caveat in the Mediation deed facilitated this neglect, but possible avenues for examining the full nature of the relationship were not pursued by the presiding Judges.

Several days after the bankruptcy judgment, Freeman was pursued by the Queensland Stock Squad and arraigned in the Gladstone District Court with stealing cattle from his property. Freeman’s documentation proved that the relevant cattle were not encumbered to Bank mortgages, and a jury found in his favour.

Freeman’s application to annul his bankruptcy was recently heard in the Federal Court in Brisbane and dismissed. He is appealing that decision.

Comments

Why some smart lawyers prefer to work for the banks

Yes its easier work and boss who seem to win, but as God Said I own the cattle on a thousand hills,
who will win this judgement in the long run please

Lex Willmott

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Support the Love for Life Campaign and the Cristian Family

Pay with Paymate Express
Not for Commercial Transactions.
Gifts only.
Paymate accepts Mastercard and Visa.

Bank:
Account name:
BSB:
Account number:
SWIFT BIC Code:
Australia New Zealand Banking Group (ANZ)
Fiona Caroline Cristian
012 547
5576 81376
ANZBAU3M

DISCLAIMER

Note: Updated Wednesday 17th June 2009 8.00pm Sydney Time. Love For Life does not support harm doing in any shape or form. However, we are supporters of free speech and post articles, documentaries, etc, that represent a wide cross section of ideas. See the Love For Life extensive research library where over 6000 documents, articles and videos are posted: http://loveforlife.com.au/issues. We clearly see the evidence of the destruction to MAN and the earth that has been caused by ALL religions over the centuries and are therefore not supporters of religions, cults, sects or any group that demands conformity of thought, speech or action, or has rules, regulations or rituals that must be followed. Religions, nationalities and cultural "identities" are formed as a result of the brainwashing we receive from childhood. They are part of the tactics the Establishment uses to keep us all divided from one another and fighting one another.

All religions promote discrimination and division, leading to hatred and even violence and murder. None of them have yet to produce a remedy to all the suffering, poverty, unhappiness and discrimination in the world. If any religion truly had the remedy to all the suffering on earth, there would no longer be any suffering. What have Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, Judaism, atheism and the New Age done to end the suffering in the world?

The Love For Life website has information from all sides on many subjects, whether about Islam, Judaism, Christianity, Law, health, psychology, mind control, vaccination, aspartame, MSG, Chemtrails etc. There are over 6000 articles, documentaries etc on the website and they are so diverse that we are sure that everyone would be able to find something they loved and something they hated, if they took the time to search. If we removed all the articles hated by everyone, there would probably be nothing left! We are not anti anyone but freedom of speech is freedom of speech and no one should condemn the work of another without taking the time to research the subject themselves. Yes, there are articles by those who have a less-than-rosy-viewpoint of Judaism, but there are also articles on the dark side of Tibetan Buddhism (and it is very dark) for those who are interested in the truth: Tibet - Buddhism - Dalai Lama: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6271 Should the authors of these articles be abused and imprisoned for daring to challenge the widely conceived reputation of Buddhism as being the religion of peace and love and that of the Dalai Lama as a saint, or should those interested be allowed to study the work and come to their own conclusions? The same applies to all the articles, documentaries, etc, about Christianity, Islam, Freemasonry, New World Order, etc.

The Love for Life website also shows how the Rule of Law, the Bar, the Government, the Monarchy, the system of commerce, the local, national and multi/trans-national private corporations, all the courses and careers on offer from our universities, all the educators, scientists, academics and experts, the aristocrats and the Establishment bloodlines have also done NOTHING to end the suffering in the world. The website maps the insanity of a world where there is no help for those in need, just as there was no help available for us when we were victims of terrible bank fraud: http://loveforlife.com.au/court_case (orchestrated, condoned and protected by an international crime syndicate/terrorist organisation of judges, barristers, registrars, lawyers, politicians, banksters, big business representatives, media moguls and other lackeys who, all together, put up a wall of silence despite our trying many, many avenues. After the family home was stolen and business destroyed we were left close to poverty and destitution caring for 4 young daughters. Three years later not much has changed regardless of all our efforts. Where were all the followers of all the religions to help us? Or do we have to be members of those religions to receive help from others involved in them?

We have been accused of being anti - Jewish because we had posted an excerpt from James von Brun's book: Kill the Best Gentiles! http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6054 in which he blames Jews for the problems of the world. Obviously this is not our view because of what we have stated above. We do not hate anyone, whatever religion they follow. We are always open to talk to any religious leader or politician and meet with any judge, member of the Bar, experts, academics, educators etc to share the remedy we offer that heals all the divisions between MAN and MAN, and MAN and the EARTH.

Today, a representative of the New South Wales Jewish Board of Deputies is threatening to close the website down, because they have decided it is anti - Jewish and that we promote racism. What has the New South Wales Jewish Board of Deputies done to end the suffering in the world? Can they show that they are concerned with the suffering of ALL men, women and children AND ARE SEEN TO BE DOING SOMETHING ABOUT IT or are they only concerned with Jewish affairs? If so, they, along with all the other religions that only care for their own, are part of the problem, not part of the solution. The man who rang Arthur today was only concerned with Jewish affairs; he was not interested in our intentions or in anybody else, just as most Christians, Muslims, Sikhs, Catholics, etc, are only interested in their own. While we separate ourselves into groups, dividing ourselves from others with rules, regulations, rituals, procedures and conditions, we will never solve our problems.

No matter what we in the Western World Civilisation of Commerce have been promised by our politicians, religious leaders, scientists, educators, philosophers, etc, for the past two hundred years, all we have seen is ever-increasing destruction of men, women and children and the earth. None of the so-called experts and leaders we have been taught to rely on are coming up with a solution and none of them are taking full-responsibility for the fact that they can't handle the problem. All religious books talk about end times full of destruction and suffering but why do we have to follow this program when there is an alternative to hatred, mayhem and death? Why are our leaders following the program of destruction and death rather than exploring the alternatives? It seems that any mainstream politician, priest or academic are only interested in supporting the RULES OF THE DIVIDE, that maintain the haves and the have nots. For 200+ years, 99% of the world population have been so trained to pass on their responsibility for themselves, others and the earth, that the 1% of the population that make up the leaders of the rest of us are making all the decisions leading to the destruction of all of us and the earth. Let's not forget the education system that brainwashes the 99% of the population that we are free and have equal rights while, in fact, we are feathering the nests of those at the top.

At the root of all our problems is self-centredness, an unwillingness nurtured by the Establishment that keeps us concerned only with our own needs rather than the needs of others around us and the Earth. Instead of creating and releasing acts of love for those around us as gifts to benefit them and the earth, we take, take and take, until there is nothing left. The whole point of the Love for Life website is to show people the root of all our problems and to share the remedy. The extensive research library is there to attract browsers and to provide access to information not available through mainstream channels. If the New South Wales Jewish Board of Deputies can, after careful examination of our work, prove that anything we are saying is wrong, we will be happy to accept their proof. If they cannot, and they are still insistent on closing the website down, they will be showing themselves to be traitors to MAN because they are not interested in pursuing any avenue that can end the suffering in the world.

All religions, corporations and organisations that support and maintain the Western World Civilisation of Commerce are part of the problem because our civilisation is a world of haves and have nots, racism, violence, hatred, poverty, sickness, discrimination, abuse, starvation, homelessness, corruption, collusion, vindictiveness, social unrest, arrogance, ignorance, fear, war and chaos. While we support civilisation, we support death and destruction because ALL civilisations that have ever existed are apocalyptic by design.

If we truly want peace on earth and freedom for all, we have to let go of all that which keeps us divided, and come together as MAN, conscious living co-creators of creation. The Love For Life website offers a remedy to the problems we all face in the form of DO NO HARM COMMUNITIES: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/3641 For more details see here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6511 and here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/3385 - We also highly recommend that everyone read the brilliant Russian books called The Ringing Cedars: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/1125 - The Love For Life homepage/front-page also provides lots of inspiring remedy based information: http://loveforlife.com.au - If you want to be kept up to date with our work please register to the Love For Life mailing list here: http://loveforlife.com.au/campaign_list We usually send two postings per month. Presently there are over 5000 registrations reaching over 200,000 readers globally. The website now receives over 2 million strikes per month with June 2009 heading close to (or over) 3 million strikes.

Conscious Love Always
Arthur and Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
17th June 2009