Emails From John Wilson - Indictment Of Supreme Court Judge For Refusing Trial By Jury - Includes Updates Since 30th April 2007

Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly versionSend to friendSend to friend

Monday May 28th 2007

----- Original Message -----
From: jhwilson
To: >
Sent: Monday, May 28, 2007 6:36 PM
Subject: Indictment of Sup. Ct Judge early transcripts

Dear Fellow Australians,

Here is a copy of the first 2 days of the Adams Indictment proceedings before a Registrar. We are still waiting for the ones of the 14th of May, when another Supreme Court Judge illegally dismissed the Indictment. These short transcripts of the 12th of March and the 16th of April will, nevertheless, be informative.

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
PS: Becuase this action is of National Importance (ie: there is nothing more important than our most precious Right being sabotaged), there is no "sub judice" restriction of spreading around whatever we want to spread around.

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
PS: We are not going to the Court of Appeal...and, from there, to the High Court of Australia.

-------------------------------------

COPYRIGHT RESERVED
NOTE: Copyright in this transcript is reserved to the Crown. The reproduction, except under authority from the Crown, of the contents of this transcript for any purpose other than the conduct of these proceedings is prohibited.

LD:SND SCC1853?J 071897

THE SUPREME COURT
OF NEW SOUTH WALES
COMMON LAW DIVISION

REGISTRAR BRADFORD

MONDAY 12 MARCH 2007

07/011031 ? JOHN PETER BAUSKIS v MICHAEL FREDERICK ADAMS

Plaintiff appeared in person
Mr C Lonergan for the Defendant

LONERGAN: I say that I don't know that it's a consent application but if I can have your registrar's leave to mention it.

REGISTRAR: Yes.

PLAINTIFF: What we want to do is get a date for the jury, please?

REGISTRAR: Mr Bauskis, is it?

PLAINTIFF: Yes.

LONERGAN: Could I just assist for the moment, registrar, if I may.

REGISTRAR: Yes.

LONERGAN: This is the first return date of the summons. The papers were served on my instructing solicitor, the crown solicitor's office, referable to Adams J back on Tuesday last, 6 March. As I say this is the first return date. As I've announced my appearance for the defendant I can say this, registrar, that at present the relief claimed against his Honour I don't think will come as any surprise to, with respect, the plaintiff or the court but there will be an application seeking to set it ? that it's struck out, but presently what is exercising the mind of those instructing me is to whether the Attorney General ought intervene or alternatively ought to appear amicus curiae or that the court appoint, because it is his Honour, a contradictor to agitate the issues raised in the summons. But presently those instructions have not been received.

Now as I say it won't come as any surprise with due respect that there will ultimately be an application to set it aside or struck out. Having said that my application would be, registrar, that the matter go over to a convenient date to allow instructions to be obtained for those purposes that I've mentioned and the date that I respectfully put forward to the court is Monday, 16 April next. What I envisage may in fact occur by that date is that subject to instructions a motion will be filed seeking the matter be struck out as I've indicated and
that submissions may be filed either by the Attorney General appearing either as an intervenor or as amicus curiae or that an application be made for the appointment of a contradictor. I would ask that the matter go over to that date for mention and that's the position of my client at the present time.

PLAINTIFF: This matter that he's just mentioned about trying to get the thing struck out, that's got to be heard by a jury anyway so can we set a date for a jury to do that matter or anything else?

REGISTRAR: There's got to be some other procedures before he moves to the court in relation to that, Mr Bauskis. As it is the first time that the matter has come in I believe
the matter should go over to 16 April, it certainly can be dealt with on that occasion.

SPEAKER: We're asking for an allocation of date for a trial by jury.

PLAINTIFF: We're asking for an allocation of date for a trial by jury.

REGISTRAR: I understand that.

PLAINTIFF: Even to hear his matter.

REGISTRAR: I understand that. I'm standing the matter over to 16 April for mention.

PLAINTIFF: This is too important.

SPEAKER: This is too important to do that. You cannot delay justice. The Magna Carta says to no?one will we sell, to no?one will we delay or deny a right to justice.

REGISTRAR: Excuse me, who are you?

SPEAKER: I am a friend of John's.

REGISTRAR: All right. Very well.

SPEAKER: You are delaying.

REGISTRAR: Well I have stood the matter over to 16 April and you're talking in terms of the delay of justice, the defendant also has certain rights and if they have to obtain instructions they will obtain instructions. This is the first day the summons has come back.

SPEAKER: They have plenty of time for instructions before?

REGISTRAR: It is stood over to 16 April, thank you.

SPEAKER: They have actually.

SPEAKER: They've got plenty of time. Set a date for trial by jury now.

REGISTRAR: No, I will not. Notice stood over to 16 April.

SPEAKER: Then you are delaying justice.

LONERGAN: Is that for mention?

REGISTRAR: For mention.

SPEAKER: When are you delaying it to?

REGISTRAR: To 16 April for mention.

SPEAKER: Will they set a date for trial by jury on that occasion?

REGISTRAR: We will see what occurs on that occasion.

SPEAKER: No, we will demand trial by jury.

REGISTRAR: You can demand a trial by jury but come back on 16 April. Thank you.

SPEAKER: And you're delaying.

ADJOURNED TO MONDAY 16 APRIL 2007

o0o

COPYRIGHT RESERVED
NOTE: Copyright in this transcriptt is reserved to the Crown. The reproduction, except under authority from the Crown, of the contents of this transcript for any purpose other than the conduct of these proceedings is prohibited.

LD:SND SCC1870?I 071898

THE SUPREME COURT
OF NEW SOUTH WALES
COMMON LAW DIVISION

REGISTRAR BRADFORD

MONDAY 16 APRIL 2007

07/011031 ? JOHN PETER BAUSKIS v MICHAEL FREDERICK ADAMS

Plaintiff appeared in person
Mr C Lonergan for the Defendant

LONERGAN: Registrar, Lonergan is my name. I appear for the defendant in this matter.

REGISTRAR: Mr Bauskis?

PLAINTIFF: Yes.

REGISTRAR: Thank you. Yes?

LONERGAN: Your Honour, when the matter was last before you on?

WILSON: What's the sheriff doing here? Why is there as a menace?

REGISTRAR: Excuse me, who are you?

WILSON: I am John Wilson. Why is the sheriff here in this position?

REGISTRAR: Well sit down please. Sit down please, Mr Wilson?

WILSON: Why is he there? He is a threat.

REGISTRAR: ???and let the court conduct its business please.

WILSON: There's no court.

REGISTRAR: Yes, Mr Lonergan.

LONERGAN: Thank you, registrar. When the matter was last before you on 12 March I sought an adjournment to today for mention in order for a determination to be made as to the nature of the appearance by the defendant his Honour Adams J. Can I indicate this, that the instructions have now been received. There will be an unconditional appearance by his Honour as the defendant in these proceedings and for that purpose could I seek the registrar's leave to hand up a notice of appearance for the defendant in this matter and I'll give a copy of it to ? thanks.

That having been done, registrar, it would be our application that the matter proceed in this manner with your leave, registrar, and that is that given the nature of the relief sought in the summons it would be the defendant's application that the matter proceed by way of a notice of motion filed on behalf of the defendant to seek to have this matter struck out.

SPEAKER: To be heard by a jury.

LONERGAN: The relief sought is such that the defendant would say there is no basis whatever for the claims made and in any event judicial immunity would be argued strongly.

SPEAKER: There's no immunity. None.

LONERGAN: So registrar for that purpose I would respectfully propose the following course. That the defendant file the notice of motion on or by 27 April next, that's essentially two weeks, with any affidavit in support together with written submissions to be filed and served. Any affidavit material, registrar, would be in the nature of a supplement to the transcript and the decisions of the court. Whilst there was attached to the case management material filed by the plaintiff in this matter, and I don't say this by way of criticism, it might be necessary to complete it ? there were some missing pages and the like ? so that in that respect that would be the extent of the affidavit material and that would be served with the notice of motion together with written submissions for that purpose of a strikeout application on or by 27 April next.

I note the comments made on the last occasion by or on behalf of the plaintiff for an early hearing of this matter once that is done and any further affidavits they seek to file or he seeks to file. We wouldn't be adverse to that course for an early hearing date of the motion to strikeout whether it be by way of a special fixture or otherwise.

PLAINTIFF: Well first off my friend there says no basis for what. All we are asking for is an allocation of a date for a trial by jury. We're not going to start filling out all sorts of affidavits and anything else, we want this tried by a jury. Now all you've got to do is allocate a date.

REGISTRAR: It's not as simple as that in relation to trial by a jury.

PLAINTIFF: Yes, it is. Quite simple. Common law is quite simple.

REGISTRAR: Mr Bauskis, I would refer you to the civil procedure rules in relation to that and specifically pt 29.

PLAINTIFF: I can't hear you, sir.

REGISTRAR: Part 29 of the uniform civil procedure rules in relation to trials by jury.

WILSON: They don't apply.

PLAINTIFF: They don't apply.

REGISTRAR: I'd also refer you to s 85 of the Supreme Court Act.

WILSON: They don't apply.

PLAINTIFF: This is an indictment to start with from a grand jury. Now what are you trying to do?

REGISTRAR: Mr Bauskis.

PLAINTIFF: You're trying to railroad the whole thing. No. No, that's not on.

REGISTRAR: Mr Bauskis. Mr Bauskis, do you need time to file affidavit material?

PLAINTIFF: I don't need time for anything because I'm not filing anything. I don't need to file it. I want it heard by a jury. Not you, not a judge, not anybody else, but by a jury of my own peers.

WILSON: If you don't set a date with allocation of a jury I will arrest you if the sheriffs don't.

REGISTRAR: Mr Wilson, just be quiet.

WILSON: What did you say?

PLAINTIFF: Due process and the rule of law, where's that? Tell me. Where's that? Huh?

WILSON: Hand up the notice, John.

PLAINTIFF: There you are. Look there, can you please take that please and give it to him.

SPEAKER: If a man wants a jury he can't get it by one ..(not transcribable)

PLAINTIFF: Come on, hand it to the registrar.

SPEAKER: ..(not transcribable)

REGISTRAR: I don't mind. Hand it up if he wants to hand it up.

WILSON: It's a legal document.

PLAINTIFF: You're making him wait. What's wrong with you people?

REGISTRAR: There's no need to be rude to the court staff, Mr Bauskis.

SPEAKER: Due process. Rule of law. Don't you believe in that here?

REGISTRAR: Mr Lonergan, do you want your motion returnable on 27 April or just filed and served by that date?

LONERGAN: Just filed and served by that date and as I said, registrar, we would be content if the matter would be subject to the court's leave for the matter to be referred for hearing at a convenient early date after that.

PLAINTIFF: We don't want a hearing. We want a date for allocation of a date for a trial by jury. You're trying to railroad me again, are you?

REGISTRAR: Mr Lonergan, is 4 May a convenient date to come back for the court and hopefully obtain a hearing date?

LONERGAN: The 4 May is suitable to me, registrar.

REGISTRAR: Mr Bauskis?

PLAINTIFF: No, it's not suitable.

REGISTRAR: Why is it not suitable to you?

PLAINTIFF: Because I've got another court case to go to.

REGISTRAR: Have you?

PLAINTIFF: Yes.

REGISTRAR: All right then, that's all right. The 11 May or would you prefer it earlier in the week of 7 May?

WILSON: This is a public hearing. I can't hear you down the back. It's a public hearing, we've got to hear what you say.

PLAINTIFF: I can't hear anything either. I've got a hearing aid on and I still can't hear you.

REGISTRAR: Good. What's your date? What date would you like?

PLAINTIFF: The date to allocate a date for the jury? Any date.

REGISTRAR: I'm asking for the hearing of the notice of motion, Mr Bauskis.

PLAINTIFF: No, forget the hearing of the notice of motion.

REGISTRAR: You've got to come back to court anyway to allocate a date so what date would you like?

PLAINTIFF: Well why can't you allocate a date now?

REGISTRAR: That's what I'm asking you.

WILSON: To empanel a jury. A jury ..(not transcribable)

PLAINTIFF: To empanel a jury, that's what I want.

REGISTRAR: Mr Bauskis, can you—

PLAINTIFF: We just keep coming back to court again.

REGISTRAR: ???conduct your case without the benefit of Mr Wilson seeming to prompt you?

WILSON: I'm a friend.

PLAINTIFF: But look all I'm after is a date for a trial by jury. Now what my learned friend here is saying?

REGISTRAR: All right. What other dates do we have?

LONERGAN: Would the week of the 14 May, Monday commencing the 14th?

REGISTRAR: The 14 May suit you, Mr Bauskis? Are you in court that day or have any other commitments?

PLAINTIFF: No.

WILSON: We will expect a jury to empanelled on that date, 14 May.

PLAINTIFF: 14 May I'll be here.

REGISTRAR: Thank you, Mr Bauskis.

WILSON: To empanel a jury.

PLAINTIFF: To a empanel a jury. Put that on record please.

LONERGAN: Registrar, there's just one further matter if I may.

REGISTRAR: Yes.

LONERGAN: On 20 May(as said) before you a notice of motion was mentioned and that was seeking orders that Mr John Wilson be joined as a plaintiff to these proceedings. On that day, the 20 March, that motion to join Mr Wilson as a plaintiff to these proceedings was stood over to today. I would ask that that motion run with ? if I can put it that way ? the Bauskis summons with respect to be stood over to 14 May. I hope that's clear, registrar.

REGISTRAR: Yes.

WILSON: Only a jury can hear the motion. You know that. Nothing inferior.

REGISTRAR: Leave is given to the defendant to file and serve a notice of motion to seek to have the proceedings struck out by 27 April 2007.

WILSON: You can’t rule on that.

REGISTRAR: Defendant to file and serve affidavit material in support of the motion and written submissions by 27 April 2007. The matter is listed for further directions and for hearing to be allocated on the motion on 14 May 2007. In addition I note that there is a motion filed by Mr Bauskis to have Mr Wilson joined as a plaintiff. That motion is also stood over to 14 May.

WILSON: To be heard by a jury.

LONERGAN: Thank you, registrar.

REGISTRAR: Thank you.

PLAINTIFF: Why, why do you keep putting things over all the time? Why can't we sort these things out now? Why can't you allocate me a date for a jury?

SPEAKER: He hasn't got the power to do that.

PLAINTIFF: Hey? Bloody hell. You just keep pushing things from one side to the next.

WILSON: We'll get a jury.

BAUSKIS: Justice. Bloody hell. ..(not transcribable)

WILSON: Adolf Hitler, Stalin. ..(not transcribable)

ADJOURNED TO MONDAY 14 MAY 2007

oOo

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Monday 28th May 2007

Sam Acharrie,
For Official receiver,
Insolvency and Trustee Service Australia,
Level 3, 135 King Street,
Sydney, NSW 2000.

Dear Mr Acharrie,

Re: Your letter to me dated 23 May 2007. Your ref: NSW 2466/7/6 (FOO)

Below is an email I sent to another traitor working for the Australian Bureaucracy....don't call yourself the Australian "Government" because the Australian People are the Government - not the public servants who have turned into traitors.

There is no "sequestration order" because there was never a Judgment because there was never a Court because there was never a Jury.

So, stick all your worthless paperwork where is belongs...in the toilet.

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.

----- Original Message -----
From: jhwilson
To: Philip_Patterson @ agd.nsw.gov.au
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 1:35 PM
Subject: Re: "Conviction For Failing To Vote"

Dear Mr Patterson,

The "bankruptcy proceedings", as you call them, are totally illegal...as are all the other "proceedings" conducted by the Kangaroo Courts of this nation every time an Australian's Right to Trial by Jury is denied by fraudulent, lying, criminal and treacherous "Magistrates" and "Judges". There was no "Conviction For Failing To Vote" because there was no Jury to judge the action. Any enforcing of such criminalities are, themselves, criminal and, because an Australian's Right to Trial by Jury was denied, all such enforcing is an act of Treason. The "ags", or "Australian Government Solicitor", and staff are party to that Treason.

Why do you choose to be a Traitor to your country, your neighbours and your family?

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.

----- Original Message -----
From: Philip_Patterson @ agd.nsw.gov.au
To: jhwilson @ acay.com.au
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 11:48 AM
Subject: Fw: "Conviction For Failing To Vote"

Dear Mr Wilson,

I refer to my letter of 7 May 2007, and to your prompt, kind response by email dated 9 May 2007.

I am pleased to inform you that your appearance before Registrar Walton at the Supreme Court of New South Wales on Friday 25 May 2007 is not required.

I have taken the step of vacating the examination hearing in light of the bankruptcy proceedings currently brought against you by the Australian Taxation Office. This is necessarily a result of the operation of s. 58(3) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966.

I anticipate my client will be satisfied to resolve your outstanding debt the subject of the current enforcement proceedings by way of the bankruptcy proceedings currently on foot.

I will confirm the contents of this email in writing in due course.

In the meantime, I thank you for your cooperation in this matter.

P.

Phil Patterson
Solicitor
Commercial Law Practice Group
NSW Crown Solicitor's Office

Telephone (02) 9224 5284
Facsimile (02) 9224 5144

DX 19 SYDNEY
GPO Box 25 Sydney 2001
60-70 Elizabeth Street
SYDNEY NSW 2000

"jhwilson" jhwilson @ acay.com.au

09/05/2007 01:30 PM

To
crownsol @ agd.nsw.gov.au
cc

Subject

Conviction For Failing To Vote"

Philip Patterson,
Solicitor,
for Crown Solicitor,
60 - 70 Elizabeth Street,
Sydney, NSW 2000.

Dear Mr Patterson,

Today, I received a registered letter from you (Your Ref SEO 15300144 and dated 7 May 2007). It is headed "Wilson J: Supreme Ct Appeal Against Conviction For Failing To Vote" and says I am "required
to appear on 25 May at 2pm before Registrar Walton at the Supreme Court of New South Wales, Law Courts Building, 184 Phillip Street, Sydney, 200, for the purposes of Examination of (my) financial circumstances".

I have never been convicted of anything, which includes being convicted "For Failing To Vote", simply because I have never faced a Trial by Jury for anything. I have never consented to be without a Jury and, therefore, "any awards doings and proceedings" from such Kangaroo Courts "are not to be drawn into consequence or example", ie: any "Judgments" are illegal.

I may decide to attend the Supreme Court, on the occasion you refer to - simply for the purpose of telling "Registrar Walton", or any other fraudulent Judicial Officer, that they can "go fly a kite".

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
http://www.rightsandwrong.com.au

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monday 28th May 2007

Dear Eon,

He was the Judge in the Court of Appeal who released me from prison on 29 February 2000 from the 2 years sentence imposed 15 weeks earlier by a Kangaroo Court conducted by the "Chief Judge at Common Law" Woods. Also, in his speech when he was sworn in as a Justice of the High Court, he spoke about his father as being a great patriot and how his father said that the People should and are perfectly capable of running their own country. Also, a brief encounter I had with him in the High Court in Canberra indicated/suggested that he was guilt-struck by what he rostered to do, ie: he walked into the courtroom, never once looked at me, handed a typed "Judgment" (to dismiss my action) to the clerk to hand to me, turned around and walked out of the court through the door behind the bench and never said a word.

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.

----- Original Message -----
From: Eon........
To: 'jhwilson'
Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2007 1:36 PM
Subject: RE: Australia will be looking to John Dyson Heydon.

John, could you please explain why this one Judge may do different to all the others. You may have covered it elsewhere but unfortunately I seem to have missed it.

Regards,

Eon Radley

From: jhwilson
Sent: Saturday, 26 May 2007 10:45 AM
To: Christopher.............
Subject: Re: Australia will be looking to John Dyson Heydon.

Dear Chris,

It all comes down to the old "weather" saying...."everyone conplains about it..." with one big difference, ie: we can do something about the Banks because we have Trial by Jury.....we've just got to use it. Magna Carta doesn't only provide for "accountable government"...it does that and more to Banks.

What John Dyson Heydon's got to do is defy his evil brother Judges and go public about Trial by Jury being inalienable.

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
http://www.rightsandwrong.com.au

----- Original Message -----
From: Christopher.........
To: jhwilson
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 5:56 PM
Subject: Re: Australia will be looking to John Dyson Heydon.

Dear John,

May the judge you mentioned will have the courage to redeem justice for all Australians, and that its vibratory waves, if it hits the media, will eminate throughout some parts of the world, who have the courage to reinstall power to the people.

Secondly I wish to send you this link, on how naughty banks can be (you know this I know, but just to beef up your points against the banks):

http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Banking/BetterBanking/WhenBanksTurn...

May Our Father bless him and yourself in the pursuit of true justice.
Kind regards,
Chris

----- Original Message ----
From: jhwilson
To: Hanna
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 9:19:16 AM
Subject: Australia will be looking to John Dyson Heydon.

Dear Hanna,

I know the treachery of Judges in the High Court...been there 7 times.

There is one Judge on the HCA, John Dyson Heydon, who is the key to it all. He is the only man who can redeem the Judiciary and preserve the Peace. When the High Court hearing is scheduled, we all should bring national attention on him. Quite frankly, we all should be praying for him to have the strength to fulfil his destiny.

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Monday 28th May 2007

----- Original Message -----
From: "john bauskis"
To:
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 8:22 PM
Subject: Police harassment

Dear John,
Just to bring you up to date with the carrying on with the police and judiciary, On the 17-5-07 I went to Parramatta Local Court to support Bob in his case (the Ministry of Transport have charged him for
having his shirt tails outside his trousers and not displaying his photo ID in a holder).

They think they have jurisdiction in all matters, (we were wearing our "TRIAL BY JURY IS DEMOCRACY" tee shirts. Anyway I walked into the local court and went through the same procedure in putting my bag through the X-Ray, as normal they saw my Swiss Army Knife, I gave it to them.

They have a new security firm working the machines, not the sheriffs, on filling out the receipt she asked for ID I told her that I don't have to give her any ID as I know who I am (I must show ID for a receipt?). I wrote my name on the receipt and she wrote the rest including my telephone number, we went into court and Bob challenged the jurisdiction of the court.

In a few minutes the judge didn't know what she was doing, and with me interjecting, the prosecutor came over to me and tried to tell me that if I didn't shut up he would get me ejected from the court,(guess who now has authority to do this) so the magistrate needed advice so decided to adjourn until she got advice. She asked Bob to wait outside until called, we went to the foyer, we got some tea and were sitting there when 3 police arrived with my knife in hand wrapped with my receipt, he asked if I knew that it was illegal to have a knife in a public place (you know my answer).

Then he asked for my ID, (do we need to Identify our selves to the police?) because I didn't, 2 burly armed police grabbed me one on each arm and marched me of to the police station next door. At the police station they asked me for my ID, I didn't give it to them, well that sent them into a frenzy. All threats were used. I got searched twice, both times they didn't find my pension card, railway ticket and a pen in my breast pocket.

I went from one cell to another, they wanted to take my fingerprints, (not without my permission) so they tried, by force without success, (I kept pulling my hand from the machine, it took 2 of them but they gave it away in disgust). Eventually when they were going to send me to Silverwater that they passed me to Corrective Services, well these people are not human (my previous experience re Tee-shirt incident).

On being strip searched they found the pension card and pen, At around 3.30pm they decided I had to go before a magistrate, (I had been in custody since 10 am). So in front of the magistrate supposedly charged with "Possess knife in court premises" and "Resist police/hinder police/incite another to assault/resist/hinder police". How is that for charges?

I am now out on bail (again ) until the 13-6-07 I have already filed a Special appearance with affidavit etc, so we will continue on the 13th to fight for our freedoms.
Enjoy
John Peter Bauskis

ps. Since than I have been told that any one who brings in a knife is to be reported to the police, what a scam !!!! who is trying to make some money out of the ignorance of the people? and are the judges in on this? we will find out (maybe ) on the 13-6-07

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Saturday 26th May 2007

Dear Tony
Please pardon this intrusion. Re your piece on courts below. It is obvious that the proper title of the cesspools of corruption, posing as courts, is as the bible aptly names them.... HEATHEN COURTS. The HEATHEN COURTS and their appendages are idolaters..... money is their prime idol. (they love it) Such is the lot of those who allow Satan to rule the world. Am I "preaching to the chior"?
Regards
Col

----- Original Message -----
From: jhwilson
To: Anthony.....................
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 10:38 AM
Subject: Re: [independentamericans] NO OATH OF OFFICE - NO OFFICE!"

Dear Tony,

Does your Constitution say that your Courts are Courts of Admiralty Law...or does it say you have the Right to Trial by Jury?

Why was there a Declaration and a War of Independence?

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.

----- Original Message -----
From: Anthony.............
To: jhwilson
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 10:19 AM
Subject: Re: [independentamericans] NO OATH OF OFFICE - NO OFFICE!"

John,
Forgive me, have a migraine. In America we have in our constitution the right to contract. Courts here operate on presumption. The presumption you are under obligation to perform through adhesion/unilateral contracts. For example, you are using fiat money, therefore you are receiving benefit and are compelled to perform according to the rules and regs. The monetary system of fiat money is under the rules of commerce, Lex Mercatoria, international law [old NIL], admiralty jurisdiction. Since you are under contract, offer, acceptance, consideration you have voluntarily surrendered your natural rights and retain relative rights, reason why most get clobbered bringing up constitutional arguments in administrative courts. They are courts of contract, commercial in nature. The social security number or use of federal reserve notes is evidence of the contract, rem, res. Maybe I'm "preaching to the choir" but it clears up the confusion of the ruling of no trial by jury and improper oaths.
Tony

-------Original Message-------

From: jhwilson
Date: 5/17/2007 8:06:28 PM
To: Kevin............
Subject: Re: [independentamericans] NO OATH OF OFFICE - NO OFFICE!"

Dear Kevin,

At least US Judges swear a proper Oath.

Australian Judges swear an Oath to a foreign power (ie: the Head of State of the UK) which denies having any Jurisdiction in Australia...and even the Australian Judges in the Australian High Court agree.

That's right...it makes no sense, at all....but they keep the charade going.

So, you can see the reason why the Banks have the Judges in their pocket. The Banks fear Trial by Jury . because Juries will dessimate the Banks... and the Judges fear Trial by Jury....... because the Truth would exposure of their criminality, as well.

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kevin
To: "John Wilson"
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 9:29 AM
Subject: Fwd: [independentamericans] NO OATH OF OFFICE - NO OFFICE!"

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Wednesday 23rd May 2007

Dear Chris,

We have filed a Holding Summons in the Court of Appeal and await the transcript to put the White Folders together.

The "Judges" in the Court of Appeal will typically follow the Traitors' Trail and dismiss the Application for Leave to Appeal.

Then we file in the High Court of Australia.

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.

----- Original Message -----
From: Chris.............
To: jhwilson
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 4:42 PM
Subject: Re: "Conviction For Failing To Vote"

John, Hi!
Is there still a chance Adams will be imprisoned. I thought it was a done deal, what follow up action can be taken. I understand possibly the same principles apply, that it also was a Kangaroo court
and the residing judge is also guilty as well, is that right? if so is there any action to take place in that respect? Have they tried to extract costs from Bauskis? No Trial, No Costs?
Chris................

----- Original Message -----
From: jhwilson
To: Ray............
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 4:25 PM
Subject: Re: "Conviction For Failing To Vote"

Dear Ray,

Without Trial by Jury, no Judgments (for Bankruptcy or anything) are valid.

There is no point in initiating legal remedies until Adams is imprisoned and the Right to Trial by Jury is restored ... only then will Justice begin to return. When the Adams case gets to the High Court of Australia, hopefully we will muster a large number of men and women into the Public Gallery....that is the end of the line.....that's when we'll sort out those traitors.

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tuesday 22nd May 2007

J.A.I.L. News Journal
______________________________________________________
Los Angeles, California

______________________________________________________

The Battle Lines are Drawn: J.A.I.L. versus The Foreign Power

A Power Foreign to Our Constitution

www.sd-jail4judges.org

Mafia, or the Courts:

Which is Worse?

By Ron Branson - National J.A.I.L. CIC

Above, I ask the question, "Mafia, or the Courts: Which is Worse? But is there really a difference? I can think of a few. When the mafia pulls off its heists, no one argues that their acts are criminal. Further, when the mafia hits a home, they do not alter records to assume legal ownership of the property, nor do they sell the home off to the highest bidder. Further the mafia never holds anyone in contempt, or throws anyone in jail for speaking out for their rights. The mafia merely takes what they came for and leaves.

And there is one other good distinction about dealing with the mafia. If you have the guts to do so, you can always shoot back! But, I ask, where is one's redress of grievance when the courts alter and falsify court records in pulling off their heists? Then there is the comforting factor that the mafia is never shielded by "judicial immunity," nor even "mafia immunity," and can be sued.

Let there be no doubt that everything our country has stood for, namely "Liberty and Justice for All," is being underminded slowly but surely by our nation's judiciary. Hear the testimony of one principled attorney when the judge was challenged that he was being unfair; the judge leaned over the bench, looked down, and responded, "Counselor, whoever informed you that a judge has to be fair?" In a similar vein, a judge told this author, when a plaintiff in court, "Mr. Branson, I have never read a single paper you have filed in this court." And here, it is the complaint that establishes the jurisdiction of the court. Another judge retorted in a case, "If you bring up the Constitution one more time in my courtroom, I am going to hold you in contempt!" This kind of vulgar attitude is expressed time and time again all over this country by judges, and is a far cry from what one observes on TV with the entertainment judges.

This nation faces an emergency and is in dire need of judicial accountability that will come about as a result of the passage of J.A.I.L., state by state. It's time all Americans get serious and see to it that it is passed! Read the below Miami Herald article which just a sample of similar reports made to J.A.I.L.

Ron Branson

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Monday 14th May 2007

Here are some of the many emails we receive from John Wilson since today.

Dear Fellow Australians,

As to be expected from a TOTALLY CORRUPT JUDICIARY, John Bauskis has just phoned in to say that Justice Peter Anthony Johnson struck out the Indictment against Justice Michael Frederick Adams, this afternoon in Courtroom 11C of the Law Courts Building, Queen's Square, Sydney.

Johnson endorsed the argument put by Adams's barrister, Christopher Lonergan (appointed by the Crown Solicitor...and paid for by taxpayer's money) that Judges are "immune from prosecution" and the Indictment against Adams for denying John the Right to Trial by Jury was "frivolous".

Of course, John protested the whole time that there HAD TO BE A JURY to judge the Indictment and any Notices of Motion and that any precedents of rulings that Judges have Immunity were made by Judges - NEVER BY A JURY.

THE FIGHT IS A LONG WAY FROM OVER ....... IT'S FIGHT OR PERISH.

Next is the Court of Appeal...which is ruled by the same EVIL JUDICIARY...where we expect to witness the same TREASONOUS performance.

Then on to the HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA....which is ruled by the same EVIL JUDICIARY.

IT'S US OR THEM.

We will fight the EVIL THAT THEY ARE.... IN OUR COURTS.

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
PS: John B. said that the Sheriffs threw Peter Melov out of court, this time.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Laurence,

That's been their perverted position for some time. They are the greatest liars this (or any country) have ever had imposed on its People.

The courtroom fighting is getting more physical...but no blood has been spilt, yet. Today, the senior Sheriff repeatedly said, "Someone is going to get seriously hurt.". My reply was, "Well, you back off. You blokes are in the wrong.".

The courtroom is the ONLY arena in which to fight for our laws and our liberties.

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.

----- Original Message -----
From:l
To: jhwilson
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2007 10:55 PM
Subject: Trial by Jury & Bill of Rights

Dear John.

Thought you may be interested in a High Court statement concerning trial by jury,Magna Carta,and 1689 Bill of Rights.

On page two McHugh J states "they are not declarations of rights that could not be altered by Parliament".

How can any one be so ignorant of the importance the Bill of Rights is to our Constitutional Monarchy and our rights.This bill gives us protection against an elected dictatorship and if that fails then we have the right to use arms against an unjust government . This is the reason the right to bear arms was put in the bill.

The case is Essenberg v The Queen B55/1999 (22June 2000)

Office of the Registry

Brisbane Nos 54 and B55 of 1999

Laurence H.......

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monday 14th May 2007

Dear Fellow Australians,

Re: Indictment of Supreme Court Justice Michael Frederick Adams.

This morning the Australian Judiciary continued their "venal and oppressive" ways and a wrestling match ensued.

Adams's barrister, Mr Christopher Lonerga, began proceedings by asking for another adjournment and the Registrar, Mr. ? Bradford, agreed and said the matter would be adjourned....but before he could set a date, I sjouted "No more delays. You are delaying Justice. I am going to arrest you.". Directly in front of me stood a tall bald Sheriff. I moved forward and this person grabbed me and I sai, "Get out of the way". He tried to hold me back and we crashed around a little. Two other Sheriffs, who were only a few steps away, jopined in and we had a merry old tussle as they man-handled me towards the door of the courtroom as a crowded gallery stood watched. We were stmbling towards the door and I said to one of them, who always turns up when I'm in court, "Don't do that...you'll hurt yourself."...and, sure enough. when we crashed into the wall he was between me and the side of the doorway. We then wrestled out into the corridor and fell to the floor as the audience followed us out. I was helped up by one supporter who asked, "Are you all right?". I said, "Yes. I'm okay"....which I was, as we didn't actuall exchange blows - we just did the "Courtroom Shuffle".

Still having hold of me they took me to a small adjacent room and there they confined me.....false imprisonment, I suppose. The tall bald one said, "I don't want this shit on a Monday morning." The senior Sheriff tried to tell me that I can't arrest a Judge or a Magistrate while he's on the bench. I told him, "That's rubbish. He was committing an offence and that's the time to arrest him....he had to be stopped."

Anyway, we chatted for a while and then Ray Lovett knocked on the door and he was let into the room. Ray had my briefcase. We all chatted for a bit longer, etc., etc. After about another 10 minutes, the senior Sheriff said he was "I'm giving you directions to leave the Court building or I will arrest you.". I decided nothing would be gained at that point in time, and we all walked to the lifts with the marvellous attention of the 20 or so supporters. Peter Melov tried to get into the lift with us but he was shoved out by 2 of the thugs. We all gathered outside the building in the blazing autumn sun. John Bauskis stayed behind in the courtroom and joined us after about 20 minutes. John is doing a fantastic job and the Australian people couldn't have a better man working for them.

We adjourned to the Hyde Park Barracks, across the road for coffee and re-grouping.

John has to go back at 2:30 PM to a Duty Judge (? Johnson) and Adams's barrister wants this Judge to striked out the Indictment against Adams, ie: rule that another Judge is above the law. I'll report what happens in the next bulletin.

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Fellow Australians,

Yesterday, on Foxtel, the History Channel did a program on the rise of Hitler (which they often do...and it's good they do). One part told of the GESTAPO. The narrator said that its "Official Policy" was "The Suppression of Opposition" and that the system they created in Germany's Courts was that "any appeals against the GESTAPO could only be heard by the GESTAPO, itself".

Michael Frederick Adams's Defence Attorneys, the Crown Solicitor, has filed a Notice of Motion to Dismiss the Indictment on the grounds that it is "frivolous" and that there exists a "high policy" of "Judicial Immunity". I have encountered these tactics before, when filing actions against Judges. The Judges refuse to allow Trial by Jury and eagerly proceed summarily to dismiss these actions for those "reasons".....reminiscent of the GESTAPO practices mentioned above.

What will happen on Monday? Will the Registrar allocate a date for Trial by Jury....or will he/she try to schedule a Judge to hear the Notice of Motion?

This is why we need witnesses in the Courtroom, ie: ordinary Australians there to see and hear what transpires.

Michael Frederick Adams is charged with denying John Peter Bauskis the Right to Trial by Jury. This is an offence carrying a punishment of "not more than five years imprisonment" for Adams. Adams imprisoned John for 14 days, because John wore a T-shirt with the words, "TRIAL BY JURY IS DEMOCRACY". Adams accused John of "Contempt of Court". Adams heard and judged his own accusation against John. Adams conducted a Kangaroo Court by disregarding Legal Rights and disregarding Legal Procedures. How does that differ from the practices of the GESTAPO?

Foxtel is great for old movies, sport and history. However, I object to paying $100 a month and them still bunging on advertisements.

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
PS: Don't forget: Monday 14th May 2007, for 9:00 am at the Law Courts Building, Queen's Square, Sydney.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Ant,

I have had no success in getting a Jury in any action in any Australian Court....my website has
"Transcripts and Judgments" which bear testimony to that.

Challenging the Jurisdiction of a Court is a proper Legal Procedure ...and the Magistrates and Judges, by disreagrding that Legal Procedure (together with their disregarding Legal Rights) categorize those Courts as being "Kangaroo Courts" (see definition of such).

Therefore, you may ask, "Why bother Challenging the Jurisdiction of the Court, if all the Courts are Kangaroo Courts?"...... I'll leave that to you to figure out.

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
http://www.rightsandwrong.com.au

----- Original Message -----
From: Global Sovereignty
To: jhwilson
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 12:17 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: To John Wilson. Common Law versus referenda. From Kenn d'Oudney.

Hi John, with your following response (shown below) you sent in answer to my points (but not directly answering them), please tell me how many court cases you have:

1. Successfully challenged the jurisdiction of the court and got a true answer. Hence by so doing, what was proceeding in admiralty was recognised as a common law issue (e.g. a property or injury settlement)
2. Asked for a special jury to determine the jurisdiction of the court prior to proceeding or realising it's the wrong court to have the hearing and appeal.
3. Empanelled a jury (by the courts consent or through common right) and they found subject matter indicating an admiralty court
4. Empanelled a jury (by the courts consent or through common right) and they found relationship indicating an admiralty court
5. Empanelled a jury (by the courts consent or through common right) and they found incompetency of the court

I will then be able to clearly see your point that juries can and are making a difference in the alien courts that have been placed on this land (called Australia) to basically steal any real property that is ours by simple definition, or impair our natural law to exist without government by corporate fictions.

John Wilson said:

If you find yourself in an "Admiralty Court", Challenge the Jurisdiction of the Court....only a Special Jury can determine the Jurisdiction of a Court...a Jury will decide if the " Admiralty Court" has the Jurisdiction for Subject Matter, Relationship and/or Competency.

Cheers
Ant

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Mark,

Passions do run high, when injustice prevails.

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.

----- Original Message -----
From: Mark
To: <
Cc: Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 4:41 PM
Subject: Revolution potential

Mr Gary Byles, Sheriff of NSW

We the people of Australia ARE watching your next move Mr Byles. Do the lawful thing and remove our tyranny or I will hold you responsible for the outcomes.

Make no mistake Sir. This is a direct warning to any criminals parading as lawful citizens. I judge your actions and will take any steps necessary to rectify this criminal behaviour by Magistrates.

When reasonable men are oppressed by tyrants, then war is the only answer.

My forebears died for our freedoms and I will defend them until the bitter end Sir.

Are you going to support criminal behaviour? If you do, consider me your sworn enemy until death.

I remain, Mark ........ Australian

IMPORTANT NOTICE: This email is intended for the use of the individual addressee(s) named above and may contain information that is confidential privileged or unsuitable for overly sensitive persons with low self-esteem, no sense of humour or irrational religious beliefs. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email is not authorised (either explicitly or implicitly) and constitutes an irritating social faux pas. Unless the word absquatulation has been used in its correct context somewhere other than in this warning, it does not have any legal or grammatical use and may be ignored. No animals were harmed in the transmission of this email, although the fox-terrier next door is living on borrowed time, let me tell you. Those of you with an overwhelming fear
of the unknown will be gratified to learn that there is no hidden message revealed by reading this warning backwards, so just ignore that cold shiver running through your spine. However, by pouring a complete circle of salt around yourself and your computer you can ensure that no harm befalls you
and your pets. If you have received this email in error, please add some comments designed to terrorise the small minds of fools and forward it on to them and watch them react!

OR, if your the serious type:-

This e-mail is intended solely for the person or organisation to whom it is addressed, and may contain secret, confidential or legally privileged information.

If you have received this e-mail in error or are aware that you are not authorised to have it, you MUST NOT use or copy it, or disclose its contents to any person. If you do any of these things, you may be sued or prosecuted.

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

UCC 1-207/1-308

I/we reserve my/our right not to be compelled to perform under any contract or commercial agreement that I/we did not enter knowingly, willingly, voluntarily and intentionally. And, furthermore, I/we do not accept the liability of the compelled benefit of any un-revealed contract or commercial agreement.

If you have received this e-mail in error, please contact the sender immediately.

Thank you from Mark ..........

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----- Original Message -----
From: jhwilson
To: crownsol @ agd.nsw.gov.au
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 1:30 PM
Subject: Spam: "Conviction For Failing To Vote"

Philip Patterson,
Solicitor, for Crown Solicitor,
60 - 70 Elizabeth Street,
Sydney, NSW 2000.

Dear Mr Patterson,

Today, I received a registered letter from you (Your Ref SEO 15300144 and dated 7 May 2007). It is headed "Wilson J: Supreme Ct Appeal Against Conviction For Failing To Vote" and says I am "required to appear on 25 May at 2pm before Registrar Walton at the Supreme Court of New South Wale, Law Courts Building, 184 Phillip Street, Sydney, 200, for the purposes of Examination of (my) financial circumstances".

I have never been convicted of anything, which includes being convicted "For Failing To Vote", simply because I have never faced a Trial by Jury for anything. I have never consented to be without a Jury and, therefore, "any awards doings and proceedings" from such Kangaroo Courts "are not to be drawn into consequence or example", ie: any "Judgments" are illegal.

I may decide to attend the Supreme Court, on the occasion you refer to - simply for the purpose of telling "Registrar Walton", or any other fraudulent Judicial Officer, that they can "go fly a kite".

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
http://www.rightsandwrong.com.au

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Bruce,

Next Monday, the 14th of May, the Indictment of Adams (File No: 11031 of 2007) will be in Court at 8:59 AM, ie: the NSW Supreme Court, Queen's Square, Sydney....the 20-storied square building at the top end of Hyde Park and bottom-end of Macquarie Street.

So, it's best to get there a little ahead of time. I'll be in the plaza of Queen's Square from 8:30 AM.

There'll be no shortage of Sheriffs ... and we want to show them how law-abiding we can be when the Rule of Law is obeyed and Due Process is observed.

Bring a friend.

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----- Original Message -----
From: jhwilson
To: judson witham
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 9:42 AM
Subject: Fw: Repossessions, Foreclosures in the USA

Dear Judson,

That http://www.fame.org is a good website.

Yes PRE-TRIAL is a sinister practice, ie: the removal of access to a JURY unless a JUDGE chooses to allow it.

PEOPLE who want to exercise their RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY must CHALLENGE THE JURISDICTION OF THE COURT at those PRE-TRIAL sessions, and have a JURY determine if TRIAL BY JURY is an INALIENABLE RIGHT or nothing more than a JUDGE-CONTROLLED PROCEDURE which a JUDGE may or may not CHOOSE TO EMPLOY.

Where BANKS are involved (eg: issues of DISPOSESSIONS and FRAUD), BANKS DON'T WANT JURIES of either the GRAND or the PETIT versions....my website of http://www.rightsandwrong.com.au documents that beyond a reasonable doubt.

Thomas Jefferson said to "EDUCATE THE PEOPLE" .... and NOTHING is more essential than that PEOPLE LEARN OF THEIR RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY. Simply reading the DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE will prove the importance of TRIAL BY JURY to "Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness".

Attached to this email is a leaflet on "WHAT THE JUDGES WON'T TELL YOU". It should be handed to EVERYONE walking up the steps into any Court House.

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.

----- Original Message -----
From: Jud Witham
To: jhwilson ; Anthony
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 1:20 AM
Subject: Re: Repossessions, Foreclosures in the USA

The forclosure process in the USA is as many know a CONTRACT matter. The evidentiary threshold is PROOF of so called TIMELY PAYMENTS and things like The Last Anticedant Rule and Four Corners of the Document etc., etc. during the PRE TRYING or the PRE TRIAL of the case. You see the Pre Trial has replaced the JURY and well the Barristers and or the LIARS oops the LIARS Damn the Lawyers have been pulling that since they RAIDED the Temple Church in London.

John please IF and WHEN you get a chance write more about these issues, FIAT money and PRE TRIAL has given a MONOPOLY to that BAR / Drunkard's Club ELITE as you well know.

See http://www.fame.org for more details

Judson Witham
The Real "Son Of Swamp Fox"

jhwilson <> wrote:

Dear Anthony,

To be dispossessed requires the "legal judgment of his own equals", ie: Trial by Jury.

Surely, with the Banks "creating money out of thin air", no Juries would ignore that fraud and deliver people's homes into the hands of the Banks. And that's just one issue for a Jury to determine.

Unless both parties to any action consent to be without a Jury, any awarding done by a Judge is illegal.

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
http://www.rightsandwrong.com.au

----- Original Message -----
From: Anthony t
To: John Wilson
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 10:14 AM

American Dream Sours as Housing Market Collapses
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/050707G.shtml
The explosion in defaults began last autumn, but many Americans are now realizing that the contagion is spreading.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----- Original Message -----
From: csgroup
To: John Wilson
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 9:18 AM
Subject: Fw: Emailing: petright.htm

This is a statement of the objectives of the 1628 English legal reform movement that led to the Civil War and deposing of Charles I in 1649. It expresses many of the ideals that later led to the American Revolution.
The Petition of Right
1628

The Petition exhibited to his Majesty by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, concerning divers Rights and Liberties of the Subjects, with the King's Majesty's royal answer thereunto in full Parliament.

To the King's Most Excellent Majesty,

Humbly show unto our Sovereign Lord the King, the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons in Parliament assembles, that whereas it is declared and enacted by a statute made in the time of the reign of King Edward I, commonly called Stratutum de Tellagio non Concedendo, that no tallage or aid shall be laid or levied by the king or his heirs in this realm, without the good will and assent of the archbishops, bishops, earls, barons, knights, burgesses, and other the freemen of the commonalty of this realm; and by authority of parliament holden in the five-and-twentieth year of the reign of King Edward III, it is declared and enacted, that from thenceforth no person should be compelled to make any loans to the king against his will, because such loans were against reason and the franchise of the land; and by other laws of this realm it is provided, that none should be charged by any charge or imposition called a benevolence, nor by such like charge; by which statutes before mentioned, and other the good laws and statutes of this realm, your subjects have inherited this freedom, that they should not be compelled to contribute to any tax, tallage, aid, or other like charge not set by common consent, in parliament.

II. Yet nevertheless of late divers commissions directed to sundry commissioners in several counties, with instructions, have issued; by means whereof your people have been in divers places assembled, and required to lend certain sums of money unto your Majesty, and many of them, upon their refusal so to do, have had an oath administered unto them not warrantable by the laws or statutes of this realm, and have been constrained to become bound and make appearance and give utterance before your Privy Council and in other places, and others of them have been therefore imprisoned, confined, and sundry other ways molested and disquieted; and divers other charges have been laid and levied upon your people in several counties by lord lieutenants, deputy lieutenants, commissioners for musters, justices of peace and others, by command or direction from your Majesty, or your Privy Council, against the laws and free custom of the realm.

III. And whereas also by the statute called 'The Great Charter of the Liberties of England,' it is declared and enacted, that no freeman may be taken or imprisoned or be disseized of his freehold or liberties, or his free customs, or be outlawed or exiled, or in any manner destroyed, but by the lawful judgment of his peers, or by the law of the land.

IV. And in the eight-and-twentieth year of the reign of King Edward III, it was declared and enacted by authority of parliament, that no man, of what estate or condition that he be, should be put out of his land or tenements, nor taken, nor imprisoned, nor disinherited nor put to death without being brought to answer by due process of law.

V. Nevertheless, against the tenor of the said statutes, and other the good laws and statutes of your realm to that end provided, divers of your subjects have of late been imprisoned without any cause showed; and when for their deliverance they were brought before your justices by your Majesty's writs of habeas corpus, there to undergo and receive as the court should order, and their keepers commanded to certify the causes of their detainer, no cause was certified, but that they were detained by your Majesty's special command, signified by the lords of your Privy Council, and yet were returned back to several prisons, without being charged with anything to which they might make answer according to the law.

VI. And whereas of late great companies of soldiers and mariners have been dispersed into divers counties of the realm, and the inhabitants against their wills have been compelled to receive them into their houses, and there to suffer them to sojourn against the laws and customs of this realm, and to the great grievance and vexation of the people.

VII. And whereas also by authority of parliament, in the five-and-twentieth year of the reign of King Edward III, it is declared and enacted, that no man shall be forejudged of life or limb against the form of the Great Charter and the law of the land; and by the said Great Charter and other the laws and statutes of this your realm, no man ought to be adjudged to death but by the laws established in this your realm, either by the customs of the same realm, or by acts of parliament: and whereas no offender of what kind soever is exempted from the proceedings to be used, and punishments to be inflicted by the laws and statutes of this your realm; nevertheless of late time divers commissions under your Majesty's great seal have issued forth, by which certain persons have been assigned and appointed commissioners with power and authority to proceed within the land, according to the justice of martial law, against such soldiers or mariners, or other dissolute persons joining with them, as should commit any murder, robbery, felony, mutiny, or other outrage or misdemeanor whatsoever, and by such summary course and order as is agreeable to martial law, and is used in armies in time of war, to proceed to the trial and condemnation of such offenders, and them to cause to be executed and put to death according to the law martial.

VIII. By pretext whereof some of your Majesty's subjects have been by some of the said commissioners put to death, when and where, if by the laws and statutes of the land they had deserved death, by the same laws and statutes also they might, and by no other ought to have been judged and executed.

IX. And also sundry grievous offenders, by color thereof claiming an exemption, have escaped the punishments due to them by the laws and statutes of this your realm, by reason that divers of your officers and ministers of justice have unjustly refused or forborne to proceed against such offenders according to the same laws and statutes, upon pretense that the said offenders were punishable only by martial law, and by authority of such commissions as aforesaid; which commissions, and all other of like nature, are wholly and directly contrary to the said laws and statutes of this your realm.

X. They do therefore humbly pray your most excellent Majesty, that no man hereafter be compelled to make or yield any gift, loan, benevolence, tax, or such like charge, without common consent by act of parliament; and that none be called to make answer, or take such oath, or to give attendance, or be confined, or otherwise molested or disquieted concerning the same or for refusal thereof; and that no freeman, in any such manner as is before mentioned, be imprisoned or detained; and that your Majesty would be pleased to remove the said soldiers and mariners, and that your people may not be so burdened in time to come; and that the aforesaid commissions, for proceeding by martial law, may be revoked and annulled; and that hereafter no commissions of like nature may issue forth to any person or persons whatsoever to be executed as aforesaid, lest by color of them any of your Majesty's subjects be destroyed or put to death contrary to the laws and franchise of the land.

XI. All which they most humbly pray of your most excellent Majesty as their rights and liberties, according to the laws and statutes of this realm; and that your Majesty would also vouchsafe to declare, that the awards, doings, and proceedings, to the prejudice of your people in any of the premises, shall not be drawn hereafter into consequence or example; and that your Majesty would be also graciously pleased, for the further comfort and safety of your people, to declare your royal will and pleasure, that in the things aforesaid all your officers and ministers shall serve you according to the laws and statutes of this realm, as they tender the honor of your Majesty, and the prosperity of this kingdom.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----- Original Message -----
From: jhwilson
To: Robert K
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 12:13 PM
Subject: Fw: Our Rights to a Jury Trial and related websites.......

Dear Robert,

Thank you for your contructive email.

My website, http://www.rightsandwrong.com.au , only addresses one aspect of a greater EVIL that we are all being subjected to and you are referring to.

TRIAL BY JURY is the means of defeating the evil BANKS by, firstly, defeating their protectors, the evil JUDGES.

TRIAL BY JURY can then go on to tackle a multitude of WRONGS, which include the issues you raise...a cause for which TRIAL BY JURY has always intended, with 12 Jurors asking GOD to "SO HELP".

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.

----- Original Message -----
From: Robert K
To: 'jhwilson'
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 10:52 AM
Subject: RE: Our Rights to a Jury Trial and related websites.......

Hello John,

You want to fight for trial by jury! I sincerely wish you well. I support all efforts that challenge the elitists hold on power and their manipulative control of the people. But let’s get one thing straight from the outset. We are not battling forces that are ‘trying’ to take control of the people. Niether are these elitists new to the task. They have held ascendancy throughout history. So the problems we confront are not with people trying to take control but with people trying to maintain their historic control over man. In this light it is naive to suggest that the judges are the evil ones and imply that the denial of the right to trial by jury is an agenda of their own making. Such suggestions only play into the hands of the elitists by deflecting attention away from the existence of the cabal of elitists and their omniscient powers of deception. Yes, point the finger at those that do evil bearing in mind Christ’s words “…let he who is without sin cast the first stone…” But to single out judges as ‘the evil ones’, as if to say, ‘fix the judges up then all will be right’ ignores the blatant realities of evil that permeate throughout our society and through all walks of life. What about the ‘evil’ mass media, the ‘evil’ entertainment industries, the pimps, the drug pushers? And what about the ‘evil’ politicians that claim the title of Representative but serve only the political establishment. And then what about the ‘evil’ individual that has succumb to the incessant influences that beckon him to reject Christ and accept the way of the devil? The pervasiveness of these influences is not without effect and each of us is culpable not only for ourselves but more importantly for the destructive influence that our acquiescence to evil has on each successive generation.

Attacking judges and the denial of our right to trial by jury is attacking the symptom and not the cause. That’s what drugs do. It would be just as naive to attack doctors as the evil ones for perpetuating the power and wealth of the pharmaceutical companies. Judges and medical doctors are products of the elitists system of mind control. Many may well be aware of the hypocrisy of their profession but that’s the system they grew up in and studied in. And that’s the system that the general public has been deceived into accepting. And just as eliminating the medical industries is not going to bring about a miraculous change in peoples health neither is restoring trial by jury going to bring about a miraculous change in the level of justice. People need to know what is right they need the will to do what is right. Though Satan’s strategy has involved controlling the masses by controlling the institutions of power his purpose all along has been to destroy the souls of man. A jury of twelve people has no more an inherent claim to a just outcome than one individual. Trial by jury may bring justice to the level of the masses but it will not guarantee justice according to God’s Law.

I am saddened to see so much energy and hope being motivated by people that are yet to understand that the power of Satan is the power to deceive. Changing laws or re-establishing old laws will not alter the soul. The concept of man made laws and our whole legal system is a creation of the elitists! Arguing points of law as a process of justice is a creation of the elitists! It is calculated to bog everyone down if not bore every one to tears and put the power or the law in the hands of the law maker. Man made laws do not tell us what is right or wrong. They blatantly tell us what we can or cannot do. Only God’s Laws tell us what is right or wrong and only God can sit in judgment of those Laws.

Best wishes,

Robert Karolis.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----- Original Message -----
From: Charles ..................
To: jhwilson ; Anthony ....................
Cc: Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 11:39 AM
Subject: Re: Dispossessions in the USA

You have NO idea how serious the problem really is.

In Texas the banks and mortgage companies, the alleged "holders" or "originators" of the phony-money "loans," are just "seizing" houses by threats from "off duty" sheriff's deputies.
The use of "non-judicial foreclosures" and "non-judicial evictions" is at an epidemic level---in essence, private property has been abolished in this state, without any of the generous spirit of sharing "from each according to his ability and to each according to his need" implied by the original ideals of socialism.

Corporate-Statist-Oligarchy is the only "law" apparently known and recognized in my poor home State---and there are indications that the situation in California and Florida is only slightly less dire.....
ANYONE who thinks that they are safe taking out home-equity loans or credit-lines on their homes needs to realize that major litigation, repeated litigation, is the only way to preserve claims to property in this country---and most lawyers don't dare challenge the system, although there ARE a few.....

----- Original Message -----
From: jhwilson
To: Anthony ...................
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 8:26 PM
Subject: Dispossessions in the USA

Dear Anthony,

To be dispossessed requires the "legal judgment of his own equals", ie: Trial by Jury.

Surely, with the Banks "creating money out of thin air", no Juries would ignore that fraud and deliver people's homes into the hands of the Banks. And that's just one issue for a Jury to determine.

Unless both parties to any action consent to be without a Jury, any awarding done by a Judge is illegal.

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
http://www.rightsandwrong.com.au

----- Original Message -----
From: Anthony ...............
To: John Wilson
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 10:14 AM

American Dream Sours as Housing Market Collapses
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/050707G.shtml
The explosion in defaults began last autumn, but many Americans are now realizing that the contagion is spreading.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----- Original Message -----
From: Andrew ..............
To: diane_farina @ agd.nsw.gov.au
Cc: jhwilson
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 12:50 PM
Subject: FW: Indictment of NSW Judge..NO MORE DELAYS.

Mr. Gary Byles
Sheriff of New South Wales
Downing Centre
Liverpool St.
Sydney.

Dear Mr Byles,

As an interested Australian, and a person that has studied the Constitution of Australia for many years, I would implore you to stand on the right of Justice in relation to the matter below. Our society is rapidly becoming aware of the injustices that are being bought on the people of this once great nation. People are waking up to the evil that exists at high levels of all arms of our Government. In the not to distant future we will see, I am sure, the masses become aware of these injustices and take action. History tells us that the only action left for any society under a despotic system is to risk life and limb to fight for their freedom. I for one would never like to see this happen but as we know, history always repeats itself.

You sir have a decision to make. That decision will show the people of this nation whether they have a democracy or tyranny. Judge Adams jailed somebody not because he broke the law but because he did not like him or the ‘T’ shirt he was wearing. That shirt simply had the words, ‘TRIAL BY JURY IS DEMOCRACY’. Mr. Byles, would you pull your gun out and shoot somebody because you did not like their ‘T’ shirt. I think not. By supporting the judiciary in their action you would be supporting that arbitrary and tyrannical action which places you in a position of conspiring to pervert the course of justice, among other things.

This matter has not been publicized in the main stream media as the media is also complicit in the destruction of our rights and freedoms. But rest assured there are many thousand of Australians watching this case and its outcome. Mr. Wilson and Mr Bauskis stand for the right of all Australians and expect you to stand with them as an officer of the Crown to protect the people of this nation and to carry out your duty in line with your oath.

Yours Sincerely

Andrew ...........
Victoria NSW Australia

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mr Gary Byles,
Sheriff of New South Wales,
Downing Centre,
Liverpool Street,
Sydney.

Dear Mr Byles,

Next Monday (14th May, 2007) in the NSW Supreme Court, Queen's Square, the Indictment of Michael Frederick Adams (File No. 11031 of 2007) will be set down for a hearing pursuant to the "New arrangements for the Allocation of hearing Dates in the Common Law Division of the Supreme Court" which says, "Hearing dates will be given in the Common Law Registrar's list immediately a matter is ready for hearing".

Michael Frederick Adams's Indictment was filed on 27 February 2007. On 12 March, his barrister, Mr Chris Lonergan, made the excuse that he had only just received the brief but had no instructions. On 16 April, Mr Lonergan offered up the Notice of Appearance and said he wanted to file a Notice of Motion to have the action dismissed on the grounds of it being "frivilous" and that Judges are immune from prosecution, ie: above the law. Of course, any Notices of Motion must be dealt with by a Jury. Mr Lonergan has now filed that Notice of Motion on 23 April, together with an Affidavit and Submission. Therefore, the matter is now "ready for hearing" and a date must be allocated for the empanelling of a Jury. On Monday, 14 May, that allocation must be made and Michael Frederick Adams must face Trial by Jury.

This is undoubtedly the most important court case in Australia's history, in that a Jury must determine if Australians have the Right to Trial by Jury....a Right that is laid down in Magna Carta and reinforced by the Petition of Right, Habeas Corpus and Bill of Rights - all of which have been Constitutional Enactments in Australia since 25 July 1828 and entrenched as Common Law with the Constitutional Referendum of 1899.

It is an appalling situation, in this action, that it is the Crown Solicitor who is defending the denial of this inalienable Right and it is with taxpayers money that the Crown Solicitor is being funded.

Taxpayers' money also provides for your salary and the salaries of your Officers. You, as the "Chief Officer of the Crown", have a sworn duty to uphold the laws and liberties of the People. I would like your assurance that this is what will happen on Monday, 14 May, in the NSW Supreme Court, Queen's Square. The email below tells of a terrible situation of injustice which it appears can take root in our country if we are allow it.

Hopefully, next Monday, the Rule of Law will be obeyed and Due process observed. I rely on you and your Officers to do their duty.

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.

----- Original Message -----
From:
To: John Wilson
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 11:05 PM
Subject: Re: Indictment of NSW Judge..NO MORE DELAYS.

John... While I am NOT negative, I have learned to be cautious.

Twenty years ago I had two police officers stop me (no license on person & they knew me well). One told the other, "It's too bad it's not dark out here!" They were unaware that I had heard their words. Does that NOT imply that they might have a desire to 'beat-me-up' or????

I have a good friend who spend 7 years in a Federal Prison for wilful failure to file (income taxes). He NEVER had a trial! He was very knowledgeable and began teaching other groups, Etc. When you become a danger to them, it's time to take you out! All I'm am saying, it be careful! I also set a record in Michigan. I had rescinded my driver's license and was traveling at common law. Judge gave me 6-months in jail. No drinking, suspended, revoked, etc., Just No License on person! I denied jurisdiction... "Once challenged, Jurisdiction must be proven!" His 'proof'? Instant 6-months! Needless to say, my business was damaged, etc., etc., etc. I requested appeal bond, He set that at $30,000.00 CASH ONLY!

I am on your side. I wish I was there beside you fighting.... But be careful! If they shoot you, while it is true they did a bad, wicked, and evil deed, YOU ARE STILL LYING DEAD! These Court-House Whores and their Pimp along with the International Banksters are indeed evil beyond our imagination.... So Be Careful! God Bless You & Yours JW

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----- Original Message -----
From: Chris ............
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 4:33 AM
Subject: Our Rights to a Jury Trial and related websites.......

To all Names,

Notice that nowhere in the world have we ever gotten a jury trial against Lloyd's. Further, notice that we have not gotten justice in the Lloyd's matter. Is this cause and effect? Are 2 plus 2 = 4 ? Of course it is cause and effect....the dam judges in both countries, being part of the establishment, are finding ways to protect Lloyd's and avoid giving us a jury trial. It is pretty blatant in England, but it is also here in the USA as well. The judges can always find something or make up something in the law to thwart us in our quest for justice. And they never can find a reason to support us.

There is a worldwide movement by the judiciary (the judges) in many of the western countries (England, USA, and Australia come to mind, there are probably others) to take over more and more of our lives and to deny the common man justice, partly by denying us jury trials. Here for your information is the VII Amendment to the US Constitution which guarantees us a jury trial:
Amendment VII

In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

Pasted in below are a few of the better websites that talk about our rights to a jury trial. I have attached to this email selected quotes from the best documents that I found to speed things up for you.

Regards,

Chris

American and English Trial by Jury and Jury Nullification http://www.democracydefined.org/democracydefinedmaterial.htm

American Jury Trial
http://www.jail4judges.org/

US Constitution
http://www.constitution.org/

Fully Informed Jury
http://www.fija.org/

Florida Jail 4 Judges
http://www.floridajail4judges.org/
http://floridajail4judges.org/news.html#arrested

Florida Judicial Reform
http://www.jail4judges.org/PressReleases/PR_2007-02-21.htm

http://www.floridastoplawsuitabuse.com/facts.html

John Wilson Australian leader for Jury Trials
http://www.rightsandwrong.com.au

Citizen's Rule Handbook
http://www.geocities.com/Heartland/7006/rulebook.html#anchor4

http://www.usavsus.info/

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Fellow Australians,

As said previously, this action against a NSW Supreme Court Judge is of National Importance and, therefore, not subject to the restrictions of the sub judice rule. Here follows the Reply I put together in answer to the Submission to the Court in his affidavit Michael Frederick Adams's barrister, Mr Christopher Lonergan (working for the Crown Solicitor), filed on 26 April, 2007.

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.

SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES

COMMON LAW DIVISION

SYDNEY

File No: 11031 of 2007

John Peter Bauskis

(Plaintiff)

-v-

Michael Frederick Adams

(Defendant)

PLAINTIFF’S REPLY TO THE SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE DEFENDANT:-

1. The Notice of Motion, filed on 23 rd April 2007 by the Defendant seeking an order that the Plaintiff’s Summons filed on 27h February 2007 be struck out upon the grounds referred to in the Affidavit of Warren Mark Abadee sworn on 23rd April 2007 is to be determined by a Jury. It cannot be determined by any other means. No Judicial Officer and, indeed, no one can judge in their own cause.

2. That Notice of Motion, if successful, would have the effect of placing Judicial Officers above the Law – an intolerable situation which is repugnant to the Rule of Law and in contempt of the Administration of Justice when everyone is equal.

3. The Habeas Corpus Act 1640 abolished the Star Chamber and made it quite clear that Judges are not above the Law.

4. The Defendant asserts that Judges are above the Law and have “Immunity”. However, there is nothing in our Federal nor State Constitutions which grants anyone immunity and nothing which grants any person the power to grant immunity to another person.

5. No one is immune from a Jury.

6. No one claiming immunity can expect to be taken seriously.

7. The Defendant relies upon various parts and various rules of a “Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 ("UCPR")” which call for “the court” to adjudge whether the Summons ought to be struck out for reasons of there being “no reasonable cause of action is disclosed” or that “the proceedings are frivolous or vexatious, or “the proceedings are an abuse of the process of the court”.

8. “The court” has no Jurisdiction to proceed summarily, ie: without a Jury, without the consent of both parties to be without a Jury. Therefore, “the court” must proceed with a Jury who will judge the Justice of those “Rules” as well as the validity of those “Rules”.

9. The Plaintiff’s Summons does indeed contain the following statement of charge:­ "It is alleged that, on Friday 4 August 2006, Michael Frederick Adams, acting as a Judge of the Supreme Court of New South Wales, Common Law Division in a courtroom in the King's Street, denied me, John Peter Bauskis, my Right to Trial by Jury by saying, 'You cannot have a trial by jury. There is no procedure for having a trial by jury for offences of this kind. ' In reply to my saying, 'We request trial by jury. ' This is an offence under s. 43 of the NSW Imperial Acts Application Act 1969 No 30 which says, 'Any person guilty of any offence under any Imperial enactment included in Part 1 of the Second Schedule for which no punishment is otherwise provided is liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than five years or to a fine not exceeding 20 penalty units, or to both such imprisonment and fine. ' Such Imperial enactments are titled 'Constitutional Enactments' and include (1297) 25 Edward 1 (Magna Carta); (1627) 3 Charles 1 (The Petition of Right); (1640) 16 Charles 1 (The Habeas Corpus Act 1640); and (1688) 1 William and Mary (The Bill of Rights) which prescribe and guarantee a Freeman's Right to Trial by Jury. "

10. This charge is of the most serious kind and the Defendant’s actions strike at the very core of our System of Justice. Denying an Australia the Right to Trial by Jury is tantamount to Treason, ie: a violation of allegiance to the People of Australia. It is even a sinister betrayal of the Judicial Oath the Defendant sworn to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second of the United Kingdom which is an Oath that obligates the Defendant to be loyal to a “foreign power”.

11. CAP 52 of Magna Carta says, “If anyone has been dispossessed or removed by us, without the legal judgment of his peers, from his lands, castles, franchises, or from his right, we will immediately restore them to him;”. This action of John Peter Bauskis –v- Michael Frederick Adams is for that exact purpose.

12. This action of John Peter Bauskis –v- Michael Frederick Adams is to confirm the Sovereignty which the People of Australia have in their own country.

13. Sovereignty is “the ultimate authority to make and impose laws”.

14. This Sovereignty is exercised by way of Referenda and Trials by Juries.

15. The denial of the Right to Trial by Jury is an act of Treachery and Treason.

16. The Defendant says in paragraph 4 of his Submission that, “ Accompanying the Plaintiffs Summons is an Affidavit sworn by the Plaintiff and dated 27 th February 2007. This Affidavit, together with the above statement, represents says the Defendant, a sanitised version of the Plaintiffs actions in Court before his Honour in July and August 2006, his subsequent incarceration, as well as certain other submissions that assert a general availability or right to a trial by jury. The Plaintiffs Affidavit also raises concerns as to the legitimacy of the appointments of the Governor General of the Commonwealth of Australia together with the Governor of the State of New South Wales.”. All this is true and deserves to be brought to the attention of the people of Australia.

17. In paragraph 5 of the Defendant’s Submission, he says, “ It is also observed that annexed to the Plaintiffs Affidavit is a document that purports to be an indictment by a "grand jury" against his Honour, the Defendant, with the “foreperson" of the grand jury nominated as being Mr John Wilson.” This is wrong as the document from the Australia People’s Grand Jury conducted at Kogarah on the 18th of February 2007 is a “RECORD OF GRAND JURORS CONCURRING..... in finding for an indictment pursuant to Section 13 (a) of the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth)” (emphasis added). The Indictment against Michael Frederick Adams is the SUMMONS filed in the Sydney Registry of the Supreme Court of New South Wales on the 27th of February, 2007.

18. As to the precedents, raised by the Defendant in his Submission, relating to various Judges making rulings as to striking out pleadings using various “Supreme Court Rules” and “Uniform Civil Procedure Rules” regarding “Frivolity”, etc., a Jury will judge the legitimacy, the value and the applicability of those “Rules”.

19. A Jury will decide the Laws and the Facts of this and any action brought before them. Any Judge attempting to tamper with a Jury in the execution of their duty is guilty of a Felony.

20. The Defendant uses the term “abuse of the process of the court”. Indeed, that is the situation because the Supreme Court of New South Wales has been used wrongly by Michael Frederick Adams to incarcerate me, John Peter Bauskis. Instead of the court being “a place where Justice is administered”, Michael Frederick Adams did abuse (use wrongly) that process.

21. I am not abusing the process of the court by seeking to remedy a wrong. “He who uses his legal right, harms no one.” (a Legal Maxim).

22. The Defendant tries to claim “JUDICIAL IMMUNITY” and quotes: “7. In considering the above observations of Johnson J., particular attention is drawn to General Steel v Commissioner for Railways (supra) and to the well known principle of utilising summary judgment to strike out proceedings, being only in "plain and obvious cases". The instant proceedings is such a case. In considering the relief sought as a consequence of his Honour's actions as a judicial officer, the issue of judicial immunity is relevant for present purposes. It is well established that, as Clarke JA observed in Najjar v Haines (1991) 25 NSWLR 224 at 249, "a judge is immune from any action, be it for costs or otherwise, in respect of acts performed in the exercise of his or her judicial function." (see also Gallo v Dawson (1992) 66 AWR 859 at 869).”.

23. There is NO SUMMARY JUDGMENT in any action unless consent that is clear and unequivocal has been obtained from both parties, ie: the court has no jurisdiction to proceed summarily. Any “summary judgment to strike out proceedings” without consent is void and the culprit making that “summary judgement” ought to be punished as prescribed by law.

24. “JUDICIAL IMMUNITY” is a myth. It is an invention by Judges.

25. As to the Defendant’s statement of “a judicial officer is acting within jurisdiction”, unless both parties consent to be without a Jury, a judicial officer has no jurisdiction. “One who exercises jurisdiction out of his territory is not obeyed with impunity”; “To a judge who exceeds his office or jurisdiction, no obedience is due”; “A judgment given by an improper judge is of no moment” (Legal Maxims)

26. The Defendant’s referral to “judicial immunity at common law”, in his paragraph of “ Recently the High Court reaffirmed the scope of judicial immunity (see Fingleton v The Queen (2005) 216 ALR 474 [20051 HCA 34). In that case Gleeson CJ confirmed (at [35]) the broad sense in which an exercise of Jurisdiction" is understood for the purposes of judicial immunity at common law, that is to say, it is not open to review the exercise of a power by a judicial officer and, by demonstrating lack of reasonable cause, or even improper motive, so as to assert that it was not an act done "in the performance of his or her duties as ajudicial officer": see Fingleton per Kirby J at [ 1761; see also Fleet v RSPCA & Ors [2005] NSWSC 926 at [3 6].”, is a most dreadful lie. Common law has NEVER sanctioned “judicial immunity” in any manner or at any time. “Judicial immunity” has never been, nor is ever likely to be, part of common law.

27. The Defendant’s Submission continually presumes the the existence of “JUDICIAL IMMUNITY”. Another instance of this is the following:- “ 13. Hope MA, with whom Priestley JA agreed, said (at p.69):­- “...... The basis of the immunity of judges from civil proceedings in respect of their judicial acts, which has been part of the law for centuries, is based on high policy which has been put in a number of ways but in essence is that the immunity is essential to the independence of judges. It is a policy designed to protect the citizen and not merely to give protection to judges. As it seems to me this policy is as equally applicable to criminal proceedings for the acts of judges, in the exercise of their judicial functions, as it is in respect of civil proceedings. ... If the law were that any disgruntled litigant could charge a judge with contempt for being wrong and malafide in his conclusion, or in arriving at the conclusion without any or any sufficient evidentiary basis, the independence required of judges would be greatly eroded.”.

“high policy”? “high policy”? What and whose “high policy”? It certainly isn’t from the higher Jurisdiction that belongs to the People, ie: from Common Law. It certainly isn’t from the Bureaucratic laws that create the Office of Judgeship, ie: from Statute Law. No, this “policy” is a concoction from the Judiciary, itself.

28. The Defendant goes on with more quotes such as “ [38] This immunity from civil liability is conferred by the common law, not as a perquisite of judicial office for the private advantage of judges, but for the protection of judicial independence in the public interest. It is the right of citizens that there be available for the resolution of civil disputes between citizen and citizen, or between citizen and government, and for the administration of criminal justice, an Independent judiciary whose members can be assumed with confidence to exercise authority without fear or favour. ...”.

29. This “[38]....” quote makes not the slightest bit of sense. Common Law is the “law of the People, by the People and for the People”. The People have never granted immunity to their servants, the Judges. This would have the servants at liberty to do whatever they liked to their masters, ie: it would have the servants ruling their masters.

As for “judicial independence”, by the very nature of the Office of Judgeship and the Judicial Oath, a Judge must “well and truly serve”. They are not free to arbitrarily do or say anything – least of imprison anyone, as Michael Frederick Adams imprisoned me. Judges are not self-governing. They are governed by the Executive that appointed them and by the Statute Laws which created and maintain their Office and their activities. Most of all, they are governed by the People of Australia....notably, the WILL OF THE PEOPLE, which was categorically and emphatically demonstrated and recorded at a Referendum in 1988 when the Commonwealth Parliamentarians drafted and passed through those two Houses a proposed alteration to section 80 of the Australian Constitution to exclude Contempt of Court and Courts Martial from Trial by Jury. By the largest majority in the history of holding section 128 Referenda, it was the WILL OF THE PEOPLE OF AUSTRALIA that “NO” – Contempt of Court and Courts Martial shall NOT BE EXCLUDED FROM TRIAL BY JURY.

30. This WILL OF THE PEOPLE has been, nevertheless, been completely disregarded by the Australian Judiciary. The Australian Judiciary refuse to obey the WILL OF THE PEOPLE. Michael Frederick Adams denied me, John Peter Bauskis, my Right to Trial by Jury when Michael Frederick Adams accused me of and charged me with Contempt of Court with not even an Indictment being filed.... and proceeded, without obtaining my consent to be without a Jury, to arbitrarily imprison me for 14 days.

31. Trial by Jury is also referred to as “trial by the country”. Michael Frederick Adams has been indicted and must now face twelve of his countrymen empanelled as Jurors. The offence with which he is charged carries a punishment of “not more than five years imprisonment” and/or a totally inadequate fine, upon being found “GUILTY”, ie: upon being found to have done wrong.

32. The defendant tries to mitigate the seriousness of his offence by saying, “[39] This does not mean that judges are unaccountable. Judges are required, subject to closely confined exceptions, to work in public, and to give reasons for their decisions. Their decisions routinely are subject to appellate review, which also is conducted openly. The ultimate sanction for judicial misconduct is removal from office upon an address of Parliament. However, the public interest in maintaining the independence of the judiciary requires security, not only against the possibility of interference and influence by governments, but also against retaliation by persons or interests disappointed or displeased by judicial decisions.” and “[40] ... At common law, judicial officers enjoy no immunity or protection from criminal responsibility for their extra‑judicial conduct, and even in respect of their judicial conduct there are well‑established limits to their immunity. Judicial corruption of the kind dealt with in s120 of the Code is an obvious example. Subject to those limitations, however, the public policy which supports immunity from civil liability even in respect of conduct alleged to be malicious and lacking in good faith extends to immunity from criminal responsibility. In Yeldham v Rajski (1989) 18 NSWLR 48, a litigant charged a judge with contempt of court (a criminal offence) alleging that the judge knowingly and wilfully abused the process of the court and interfered with the course of justice. The allegations arose out of the way in which the judge had disposed of an application for leave to prosecute a witness for perjury. The New South Wales Court of Appeal dismissed the proceedings, on the ground that the judge was entitled to invoke judicial immunity. Hope AJA, with whom Priestley JA agreed, said (at 69):

'The basis of the immunity of judges from civil proceedings in respect of their judicial acts, which has been part of the law for centuries, is based on high policy which has been put in a number of ways but in essence is that the immunity is essential to the independence of judges. It is a policy designed to protect the citizen and not merely to give protection to judges. As it seems to me this policy is as equally applicable to criminal proceedings for the acts of judges, in the exercise of their judicial functions, as it is in respect of civil proceedings. ... If the law were that any disgruntled litigant could charge a judge with contempt for being wrong and malafide in his conclusion, or in arriving at the conclusion without any or any sufficient evidentiary basis, the independence required of judges would be greatly eroded '”.

33. AND what do all these words amount to? What the Australian Judiciary are doing is INDEFENSIBLE ..... therefore, all the words in the world will not excuse the DENIAL OF THE RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY.

34. Michael Frederick Adams denied me, John Peter Bauskis, MY RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY.

35. “cannot succeed”? The Indictment against Michael Frederick Adams “cannot succeed”? It not only can succeed but it MUST SUCCEED, if Truth, Justice, Freedom and Democracy are to prevail.

36. The section of the Defendant’s Submission entitled “THE RIGHT To TRIAL BY JURY” only serves to highlight the GUILT of the Australian Judiciary in its persistently denying Australians their RIGHT. “Rights never die” (a Legal Maxim)

37. I submit that “the issue is settled” AGAINST Michael Frederick Adams and, most definitely, NOT in his favour.

38. The Defendant’s Submission does no more than reveal the depth of Judicial Corruption in Australian Courts.

39. The Defendant’s Submission talks of my “prayers for relief”. I thank Mr Christopher Lonergan for drawing my attention to the participation of God in these proceedings and the words, “God and my Right” in the Royal Coat of Arms.

A “prayer” is a “solemn request to God” and “relief” is the “deliverance from pain, distress, anxiety”, “reparation, redress”, and “rectify wrong, damage, grievance, abuse”. I am requesting this. I am requesting that “No free man shall be taken indeed imprisoned, either dispossessed, or outlawed, or exiled, or in any manner destroyed, nor pass over him, nor send over him, except by means of the legal judgment of his own equals indeed the law of the land” (Magna Carta 1215 and Confirmation of Charters 1297).

Trial by Jury is when twelve free men gather and pray, “So help me God”, in order to administer Justice.

Mr Christopher Lonergan writes, “and indeed the prayers for relief cannot in law succeed”. What “law” is he talking about? In Common Law, “the prayers for relief” will certainly “succeed” because in Common Law there is Trial by Jury. Trial by Jury is an inalienable Right and no law from any Parliament can take away that Right because it is the People’s Right. The Australian Constitution is Common Law because a Referendum in 1899 adopted it. Australian Parliaments are under that Constitution and no Parliament can make laws ultra vires, ie: that exceed or violate Common Law.

I do make a “solemn request to God” for the “reparation and redress”. This Indictment is an action to be judged by a Jury, as a matter of due process. The proof as to Michael Frederick Adams committing the offence is irrefutable. The responsibility to decide on the appropriate way his wrong should be dealt with is up to the Jury.

Considering the Bill of Rights 1688 says it is “evil counsellors, judges and ministers” that “endeavour to subvert and extirpate (our) laws and liberties”, an even greater prayer comes to mind which is:-

“Deliver us from evil”.

40. In the circumstance, “Let Right be done” (a Legal Maxim).

............................................

John Peter Bauskis. Plaintiff

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---- Original Message -----
From: "unrealneil"
To: "unrealneil"
Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2007 1:53 PM
Subject: Documents attached

Document sent to Queen, SA governor, premier, speakers of both houses, British counsel, Brigadier of SA Army personnel, and others.

Mike Rann (Premier) has replied to this petition by announcing an appointment to replace the current (most travelled governor in SA's history, outside the state) last Thursday in the face of undeniable evidence that no documents have been legally authorised by the Queen for the current and past
Governors.

As no answer has been received within 7 days please spread this Petition far and wide to know that Her Majesty has failed her subjects. As in the past the subjects now have inalienable RIGHTS to take this matter further, I will be shortly instructing legal counsel to proceed to the next level.

Kindest Regards
Neil

Mining Plaint attached for your retails.

It's now out in the public domain that the government WILL NOT give up these leases without a fight. They and others have discovered the true wealth of the leases and the prospects therein including a coal deposit of about 700million tonnes.

When my barrister asked the Crown Solicitor "why haven't you tried to negotiate with Mr Russell-Taylor" her response was the minister will not permit it.

Gentlemen please file this document for future reference. (Section 9 is the issue I intent pushing the most, and will authorise my legal counsel to commence matters in the UK to ensure the Poms know exactly what is at risk; every mineral lease / claim in Australia).

Regards,
Neil......................

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Rick,

We already have our own Courts. The problem is that the criminals and traitors (ie: "evil counsellors, judges and ministers") have taken them over. It is our right + duty + responisibility to take them back. To do that, we need the power which is in those Courts, ie: the power to imprison the criminals and traitors. It's not really a "Catch 22" situation because we actually have the Law on our side....all we have to do is lawfully empanel Petit Juries. Admittedly, the criminals and traitors are denying us our Right to Trial by Jury...which is why we've started indicting them. Hopefully it won't require performing Citizen's Arrests....but, if their stupidity persists....that's exacty what we're going to do. We are at a point where it's "Life or Death", as Patrick Henry put it.

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Rick ............................
To:
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2007 12:01 AM
Subject: RE: Indictment of NSW Judge..NO MORE DELAYS.

What is keeping you from holding your own court?

IF the procedings go as you feel they might, with confrontation by the deputies, then, withdraw, regroup, ELECT a judge and prosecuter from your ranks, and empanel a citizens Grand Jury, on the spot?

The building is not the court, is it? I thought it was the People that held the court. They are the Rulers, aren't they?

Rick in Texas

From: "jhwilson"
To: "Jack ...................
CC:
Subject: Indictment of NSW Judge..NO MORE DELAYS.
Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 15:21:05 +1000

Dear Jack,

Having supporters in Court on Monday the 14th of May is extremely important because the delaying tactics come to an end then. It is very likely that the Registrar will "do the dirty" and either attempt to dismiss the Indictment (which he has absolutely no Jurisdiction so to do ... but they don't care) or he may try to assign the Indictment to a Judge (which will also be illegal because we most definitely will never consent to summary proceedings...but they don't care about legal rights let alone legal
procedures.... which makes for a Kangaroo Court). There will be plenty of Sheriffs there to intimidate us and assault us if we have to perform a Citizen's Arrest on the Registrar.

It is imperative that, on Monday 14 May, a date be allocated for the empanelling of a Jury. That is the day.

It is D-Day for NSW Chief Justice Jim Speigelman. Will the Chief Justice order the Registrar to set a date for the empanelling of a Jury or will he have the Registrar "do the dirty"?

It is also D-Day for the Sheriff of New South Wales, Mr/Brigadier-General Gary Byles. Will he have his Officers assault us, should the Registrar do wrong?

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----- Original Message -----
From:
To: jhwilson
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 4:57 AM
Subject: To John Wilson. Joel Turtel's Scenario. From Kenn d'Oudney.

http://www.democracydefined.org/
The Home Page of The Democracy Defined Campaign
for RESTORATION and UNIVERSAL ADOPTION of
CONSTITUTIONAL COMMON LAW TRIAL BY JURY.
The Democracy Defined Campaign Philosophy is endorsed by academics, attorneys, doctors (of jurisprudence, medicine, homeopathy, philosophy, etc.) and judges (U.S. & U.K.).
(Standard English Spelling)

Dear John,
This fascinating scenario shown on the U.S. ConservativeVoice.com ("dedicated to Faith, Family and Freedom") strengthens the Trial by Jury arguments of the recipients of your e-mail list.
Below the article, there is info on common law Trial by Jury, and references to esoteric medical research Findings of Fact which are today obfuscated as a result of the massive venal government-corporate ulterior money-motive.

Yours sincerely,
Kenn.

"I Don't Care What the Judge Said!"
by Joel Turtel.

"Look, Mr. Straun, John, can I call you John? We've been at this for 25 days. We're all sick of this. We all want to go home. You're the only one left. You're the one keeping us here. I got things to do at home. I got to go to work and make a living. All of us do. The judge is mad as hell at us. You're going to hang this jury. You're going to make this three-month trial into a farce and waste of time. You have no right to vote acquittal. You heard the judge's instructions. The jury is not allowed to judge the law, only the facts."

"The fact are clear as day, aren't they?" Dillard ranted. "You even admitted that to us. The guy was found with marijuana in his car. That's against the law. And the guy admitted the marijuana was his. What more do you need?" said Raymond Dillard, the jury foreman. Raymond Dillard was tall, beefy, in his 30's, and he was getting mad, so mad he wanted to beat John Straun's head in.

Straun was a small, slim man in his 30's, with a straight back, dark brown hair, large, steady eyes, and a firm mouth. He seemed not to care at all about all the trouble he was causing. And he seemed to be fearless.

John Straun said, "I don't care what the judge said. I happen to know for a fact that a jury has the right to judge the law. Jury nullification has a long history in this country. A jury has the right to judge the law, not just the facts."

Raymond Dillard and a few other jurors sneered. Dillard said, "Oh, are you a lawyer, Mr. Straun? You think you know more than the judge? What history are you talking about?"

John Straun said calmly, "No, I'm not a lawyer. I'm an engineer. But in this particular case, I do know more than the judge. When I found out I was going to be on this jury, I did a little research about the history of juries, just for the hell of it. Most people don't know this, but jury nullification has been upheld as a sacred legal principal in English common law for 1000 years. Alfred the Great, a great English king a thousand years ago, hung several of his own judges because they removed jurors who refused to convict and replaced these courageous jurors with other jurors they could intimidate into convicting the defendant on trial."

"Jury nullification also goes back to the very beginning of our country, as one of the crucial rights our Founding Fathers wanted to protect. Our Founding Fathers wanted juries to be the final bulwark against tyrannical government laws. That's why they emphasized the right to a jury trial in three of the first ten amendments to the Constitution. John Adams, second President of the United States, Thomas Jefferson, third President and author of the Declaration of Independence, John Jay, First Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, and Alexander Hamilton, First Secretary of the Treasury all flatly stated that juries have the right and duty to judge not only the facts in a case, but also the law, according to their conscience."

"Not only that, more recent court decisions have reaffirmed this right. In 1969, in "US. vs. Moylan," the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the right of juries to judge the law in a case. In 1972, the Washington, D.C. Court of Appeals upheld the same principal."

Raymond Dillard said, "Yeah, if that's the case, how come the judge didn't tell us this?"

"That's because of the despicable Supreme Court decision in "Sparf and Hansen vs. The United States in 1895." John Straun said. "That decision said juries have the right to judge the law, but that a judge doesn't have to inform juries of this right. Cute, huh? And guess what happened after this decision? Judges stopped telling juries about their rights."

"The judge knows about jury nullification. All judges do. But they hate letting juries decide the law. They hate juries taking power away from them. That's why judges never mention a jury's right to judge the law, and most judges squash defense attorneys from saying anything about it in court. Remember when Jimmy Saunders' defense lawyer started talking about it? The judge threatened him with contempt if he didn't shut up about jury nullification."

"And since you asked me," Straun continued, "I'll tell you a little more about jury nullification. Did you ever hear of the Fugitive Slave Act? Did you ever hear of Prohibition? Do you know why those despicable laws were repealed? Because juries were so outraged over those laws that they consistently refused to convict people who violated them. They refused to convict because they knew that these laws were unjust and tyrannical, that Congress had no right making these laws in the first place. So, because juries wouldn't convict, the government couldn't make these laws stick. They tried for many years, but finally gave up."

"What do you think this mad War on Drugs is that we've been fighting the last sixty years? It's the same as Prohibition in the 20's. It's the same principle. A tyrannical government is telling people that they can't take drugs, just like in the 20's they said people couldn't drink liquor. What's the difference? A tyrannical law is telling people what they can or can't put in their own bodies. Who owns our bodies, us or the self-righteous[*] politicians? Does the government own your body, Mr. Dillard? Do you smoke, Mr. Dillard? Do you drink beer?"

Dillard nodded his head, "Yeah, I do."

"Well, how would you like it if they passed laws telling you that can't smoke or drink a beer anymore. Would you like that, Mr. Dillard?"

Dillard looked at John Straun, thought about the question, then admitted, "No, I wouldn't, Straun."

John Straun turned to the others around the table. "You, Jack, you said you're sixty-five years old. You like to play golf, right? What if they passed a law saying anyone over sixty-five can't play golf because the exercise might give him a heart attack? You, Frank, you said you eat hamburgers at McDougals all the time. What if they passed a law saying fatty hamburgers give people heart attacks, so we're closing down all the McDougal restaurants in the country, and they make eating a hamburger a criminal offence? You, Mrs. Pelchat, I see you like to smoke. Everyone knows that smoking can give you lung cancer. How would you like it if they passed a law banning all cigarettes? What if they could crash in the door of your house without a warrant to search for cigarettes in your house, like the SWAT teams do now, looking for drugs? Mrs. Pelchat, how would you like to be on trial like Jimmy Saunders because they found a pack of cigarettes you hid under your mattress?"

"Do you all see what I mean? If they can make it a crime for Jimmy Saunders to smoke marijuana, why can't they make golf, hamburgers, and cigarettes a crime? If you think they wouldn't try, think again. They had Prohibition in the 20's for almost ten years, till they finally gave up. The only reason they haven't banned cigarettes is because there are thirty million cigarette smokers in this country who would scream bloody murder. They get away with making marijuana and other drugs illegal only because drug-users are a small minority in this country. Drug users don't have any political clout."

Raymond Dillard sat down in his chair. The others started talking among themselves. John Straun started seeing heads nodding in agreement, thinking about what he had said.

"OK, Straun," Dillard said. "Maybe you're right. Maybe Jimmy Saunders shouldn't go to jail for smoking marijuana. Hell, probably most of us tried the stuff when we were young. Clinton said he smoked marijuana in college. Bush said he tried drugs in college. Probably half of Congress and their kids took drugs one time or another. O.K. we agree with you. But what about the judge. He said we can't judge the law."

John Straun stood up. He was not a tall man, but he stood very straight, and he looked very sure of himself. He looked from one to another of them.

He said, "If you agree with me, then I ask you all to vote for acquittal. You are not only defending Jimmy Saunders' liberty, but your own. You are fighting a tyrannical law that is enforced by a judge who wants the power to control you. I told you that many juries like us in the past have disregarded the judge's instructions. They stood up for liberty against a tyrannical law. Are you Americans here? What do you value more, your liberty, your pride as free men, or the instructions of a judge who doesn't want you to judge the law precisely because he knows you'll find the law unjust? Will you stand with those juries who defended our liberty in the past, or will you give in to this judge?"

"Here's another thing to think about," John Straun said with passion. "What if it was your sister or brother on trial here? Do you know that if we say Saunders is guilty, the judge has to send him to prison for twenty years? I understand this is Saunders third possession charge. You know the "three
strikes and you're out" rule, don't you? The politicians passed a law that if a guy gets convicted three times on possession, the judge now has no leeway in sentencing. He has to give the poor guy twenty years in prison. What if it were your sister or brother on trial? Should they go to jail for smoking marijuana, for doing something that should not be a crime in the first place? Do we want to send Jimmy Saunders to prison for twenty years because he smoked a joint, hurting no one? Can you have that on your conscience?"

"Do you know that there are almost a million guys like Jimmy Saunders in federal prisons right now, as we speak, for this same so-called "crime" of smoking marijuana or taking other drugs? These men were sent to prison for mere possession. They harmed no one but themselves when they took drugs. How can you have a crime without a victim? When does this horror stop? It has got to stop. I'm asking you all now to stop it right here, at least for Jimmy Saunders. The only thing that can stop tyrannical laws and politicians is you and me, juries like us. If we do nothing, we're lost, the country is lost."

"I'm asking you all to bring in a not-guilty verdict, because the drug laws are unjust and a moral obscenity. I'm asking you all be the kind of Americans our Founding Fathers would have been proud of, these same men who fought for your liberty. That's what I'm asking of all of you."

John Straun sat down and looked quietly at Dillard and all the others around the table. They looked back at him, and it seemed that their backs began to straighten up, and they no longer complained about going home. They were quiet. Then they talked passionately amongst each other.

Fifteen minutes later, they walked into the courtroom and sat down in the jury box. When the judge asked Raymond Dillard what the verdict was, he was stunned when Dillard, standing tall, looking straight at the judge, said "Not guilty." Over the angry rantings of the red-faced judge, all in the jury box looked calmly at John Straun, and felt proud to be an American."
[End of article by Joel Turtel.]
~
The above article is excellent in my estimation. It clarifies some of the Jurors' duties in Trial by Jury. It illuminates the jury-room situation, demonstrating to readers the sovereign nature of the Juror and the inferior, or secondary, rôle of the judge. It is educationally of great worth and should be forwarded to every citizen.

However, because there is much more to the Trial by Jury than the article seeks to delve into, the following few observations come in the spirit of an endorsement, to adhere to Turtel's scenario.
~
A caveat to note is that the article does not bear down on some very important aspects of Trial by Jury which are abused by the judiciary today, as follows, 1, 2 & 3:

1. DEFINITIVE EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE.

The article does not relate that at all such cannabis trials, judges disgracefully exclude from presentation to juries the official exonerative evidence of the state-funded empirical medico-scientific clinical studies.

The Empirical [i.e. the clinical investigations of hands-on, actual long and short-term use by human test subjects] Studies conducted by world-respected academic and research institutions are definitive. They unanimously exonerate cannabis, thereby exempting it from prohibition on grounds of 'harm'. The Empirical Studies vindicate defendants' cultivation, trade, possession and use.

The evidence excluded by judges establishes that the prohibition is money-motivated, unfounded, inequitable and hence illegal. This unlawfully suppressed expert evidence includes documentary, legal, academic, economic, scientific, medical, technical, philosophical, and that which is based on grounds of equity. Today, judges tell jurors to consider only that evidence which he or she allows !

The judges withhold all evidence from presentation in court before the jurors if such evidence "disputes the validity and legality of the law."

Further, in order to receive their lucrative emoluments, lawyers perjuriously acquiesce to this denial of their duty to find and present the Whole Truth.

The evidence of the official Empirical Studies does not "dispute" the law as such: it abrogates it. All persecuted thereunder qualify for Amnesty and Restitution (as for all Wrongful Penalisation). See the exonerative clinical evidence collated in THE REPORT ISBN 9781902848204.

2. ADMISSIBILITY.

The article does not explain that for a Trial to be BY JURY (as opposed to it being a trial-by-judge) the jury's duties always include that of judging on all the evidence as to its admissibility...

A.) To ascertain the truth, the jurors must see all the evidence and decide which evidence is relevant. Jurors cannot try an issue unless it is they who determine what evidence is admissible.

It is a most grave crime (of subreption and/or perjury) to exclude or withhold evidence from jurors that they would consider should be admitted were they to see it. It is inherently immoral and a criminal act to make a juror pronounce a person ‘guilty’, or to declare that one person owed money to another, on such partial evidence. If decisions on the evidence are taken by someone other than the jury, then the process cannot be called Trial BY JURY; and it is a mistrial.

B.) Whereas before jurors swore simply and justly "to convict the guilty and acquit the innocent," government has inserted the words, "according to the evidence," into jurors’ oaths. This violates Common Law, Magna Carta, and honesty (or Truth), because this wording duplicitously means "only that evidence which the government [i.e. the judge] allows the jury to receive."

If the government can dictate the evidence, and the jury is required to find the verdict according to that evidence, then government can dictate the verdict which the jury must reach. In that case, the trial is really a pretence, not a "trial" at all. It is also a rigmarole of a pretended "trial" by the government, not by a jury. This sums up the corrupt process which takes place today. It is a calumnious criminal subterfuge.

C.) This abject behaviour by the judiciary exemplifies why the Trial by Jury was constitutionally installed in the first place, in preference to "trial-by-judge." Consider the prophetic warning of U.S. President Thomas Jefferson, Founder of the Democratic Party:

"The germ of the destruction of our nation is in the power of the judiciary, an irresponsible body -- working like gravity, by night and by day, gaining a little today and a little tomorrow, and advancing its noiseless step like a thief over the field of jurisdiction, until all shall render powerless the checks of one branch over the other, and will become as venal and oppressive as the government from which we separated."

3. THE VERDICT.

To arrive at a verdict, the jury must try the whole case: the facts and evidence; the moral intent and motive of the accused (whether innocent or with malice aforethought); the justice of the law; and the fitness of a sentence, if any, the sentence itself comprising part of the judgement of the pares or peers, i.e. the Trial by Jury of indiscriminately chosen social-equals of the accused (not employees of the government).

Whenever the judge prevents or interferes with any of the aforegoing jurors’ duties, the defendant is not receiving a fair Trial by Jury. The process is a mistrial and jurors must find the Not Guilty Verdict to prevent an injustice occurring.
*Asterisk relates to the above article to denote that the politicians' government-corporate ulterior motive is venal, not "self-righteous."

Click here to see the web page which relates to the official exonerative evidence collated in THE REPORT ISBN 9781902848204, accessed by clicking beneath the reviews and endorsements:
http://www.democracydefined.org/1report.htm#reviews

Click here for details on how good King Alfred dealt with wayward judges -- a message pertinent today: http://www.democracydefined.org/democracydefinedcampaign3.htm#jurors

Kenn d'Oudney. Director.
http://www.democracydefined.org/
The Home Page of The not-for-profit Educational Campaign for RESTORATION and UNIVERSAL ADOPTION of CONSTITUTIONAL COMMON LAW TRIAL BY JURY.
The Democracy Defined Campaign Philosophy is endorsed by academics, attorneys, doctors (of jurisprudence, medicine, homeopathy, philosophy, etc.) and judges (U.S. & U.K.).
Join the Campaign ! Download and distribute free posters and educational pamphlets. Membership gratis.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Marg,

In 1981 Australian State Legislatures passed the "Consumer Credit Act" to introduce"Variation of Terms", ie: it allowed Lenders to incoporate variable interest rates into their loan contracts - which, under Common Law, is totally illegal because variable interest rates render a contract void for uncertainty. Common Law overrules Statute Law in a Democracy. The CCA also allowed for penalty and compound interest rates, which were illegal in the repealed legislation ...and because they were illegal, they are still illegal. A fuller explanation in is my book, "Banks and Judges", which on my website of http://www.rightsandwrong.com.au

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.

----- Original Message -----
From: Margaret
To:
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 10:35 PM
Subject: RE: Indicted Judge's Submission on Immunity

Hello John, Thank you for your talk last Thursday in Melbourne, as usual I
admire your spirit. Could you please explain what happened in 1981 re bank
mortgages. Thank you. rgds Marg

From: "jhwilson"
To:
Subject: Indicted Judge's Submission on Immunity
Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 13:11:44 +1000

Dear Fellow Australians,

Attached is a scanned doc. of Michael Frederick Adams's Submission to the NSW Supreme Court. On 23 April 2007, his barrister filed a Notice of Motion is for Orders that the Summons be struck out and for John Bauskis to pay the Adams's costs.

MAKE NO MISTAKE: this is of NATIONAL IMPORTANCE. Because it is of National Importance it is not subject to the "sub judice" rule of non-disclosure ...in fact, it ought to headlines in every newspaper across the country. This is Trial by Jury. It is "trial per pais"...trial by the country. This is the trial to determine whether or not Australia is a country where Free men and women exercise their Rights to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness (to borrow from our American brothers who had to go to war to get back their Right to Trial by Jury).

MAKE NO MISTAKE: if Adams is not convicted, then there is NO DEMOCRACY in Australia, and the People of Australia have NO LAWS and NO LIBERTIES.

Over the last century "evil counsellors, judges and ministers" (Bill of Rights 1688) have been systematically destroying OUR COUNTRY to the point where we are virtually of no significance and the BANKS ARE OUR LORDS AND MASTERS....and the Judges impose BANK-MADE & JUDGE-MADE LAWS on us.

It was announced yesterday that, last year, there were 5,693 evictions of Australian families who has mortgages. All the mortgages since 1981 are illegal and all the DISPOSSESSIONS resulting from them are therefore ILLEGAL. This is just one of the consequences of "evil triumphing when good men do nothing".

UNLESS we can regain OUR RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY, there are only 2 paths to follow:- (1) Total submission to servitude, or (2) BLOODY REBELLION.

The next day in Court is Monday the 14th May, 2007 at Queen's Square, Sydney. We have allowed 2 delays since the filing of the Indictment....but NO MORE. Now there must be a date allocated for the empanelling of a JURY to try Bauskis -v- Adams File No: 11031 of 2007. Adams's Notice of Motion
can only be judged by a JURY. A JURY must determine whether Australians have the RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY.

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Brent,

It all comes back to the Right to Trial by Jury.
All other Rights just don't exist without this "First Right".
Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.

----- Original Message -----
From: Melville
To: jhwilson
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 9:27 AM
Subject: Newspaper editorial on 'attacks on freedom'

Hi John: The editorial below appeared in the Gold Coast Bulletin on Saturday, April 29.
Cheers,
Melville

(while I agree with the thrust of the article, I have little sympathy for the journalists here because they have for too long protected the two-party system and persecuted political independents like Pauline Hanson and others, failed to stand up the common law system, promoted socialist, politically-correct ideologies and of late turned large sections of their editorial space over to trash and trivia. The tabloid media has also constantly demanded police state-style laws to control social problems like drugs and ‘hooning’ while giving uncritical support to the so-called war on terror and other global scams like global warming, designed as instruments of worldwide social engineering. Now the police state laws they screamed for have come back to ‘bite’ the media itself ...)

The dark path to a secret state
Freedom squeezed

ONE of the basic tenets of Australian life - freedom of speech - cannot be taken for granted under this Federal Government.

The Government appears to be taking every opportunity it can, under laws dealing with anti-terrorism and freedom of information, to suppress information and to prosecute individuals - especially newspaper journalists - who try to uncover facts that may cause discomfort to it.

The latest attack on freedom of expression takes the form of legal action stemming from the publication by two newspapers of the identity of a witness in Australia's biggest terror trial involving 13 men in Victoria. The effect of this action would dramatically expand the reach of court suppression orders in Australia.

This means that judges and magistrates using a suppression order in Victoria would have the power to fine or jail journalists in other states who did not obey the order. In other words, the Commonwealth's determination to keep a tight lid on terrorism trials threatens to spoil the media's ability to report across state borders.

The Commonwealth Press Union's Australian section chairman Warren Beeby says the Federal Government is obsessed with secrecy.

This is exemplified by Treasurer Peter Costello's court battles against The Australian newspaper to halt its investigations into bracket creep and the first home buyers' scheme. Mr Costello won, giving federal ministers the right to block Freedom of Information requests.

As well, two Melbourne Herald Sun reporters, Gerard McManus and Michael Harvey, are facing court sentences after being convicted of contempt of court for refusing to divulge the source of a leak of a secret government memo. This is in line with the Federal Police intensifying their clampdowns on public servants and journalists involved in leaks.

Twenty years after FOI laws were created, the courts appear to have legitimised official secrecy.

This is in stark contrast to FOI law administration in the United States, where officials face fines and jail if they obstruct public requests for government information.

Mr Beeby also notes that federal and state governments employ hundreds of spin doctors to ensure only approved versions of stories see the light of day.

This Government's trend towards managing any information going to the public smacks of George Orwell's futuristic book 1984.

With court orders and so-called freedom of information safeguards suppressing increasing amounts of information, the establishment of a Ministry of Truth cannot be far off.

This message and its attachments may contain legally privileged or confidential information. It is intended solely for the named addressee. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to the addressee), you may not copy or deliver this message or its attachments to anyone. Rather, you should permanently delete this message and its attachments and kindly notify the sender by reply e-mail. Any content of this message and its attachments which does not relate to the official business of the sending company must be taken not to have been sent or endorsed by that company or any of its related entities. No warranty is made that the e-mail or attachment(s) are free from computer virus or other defect.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Chris,

If Adams "gets off", it would be by legal means...but Australian Judges don't obey the law, anyway.

We're certainly not going to give in. If Adams is not convicted by a Jury, the only alternative is bloody revolution...ala the American Revolution...because it is that scenario revisited....ie: the depriving of the Right to Trial by Jury.

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Linda,

"Rules of Evidence"??? Whose "Rules"???

Just make sure you've got a fully informed Jury, who will decide for themselves what they want and don't want as evidence.

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.

----- Original Message -----
From: Linda ..............
To: jhwilson ; Robert ................
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 6:25 PM
Subject: Re: Family Court Juries Threat

Hi both,

Good on you Robert for unsettling the powers that be in the Family Court. Wonder if it would work on other judges???

May i suggest tho, that you expand your arguments to include all parents who are trying to have the truth told and believed in the family court especially when it comes to violent and abusive parents of either gender. I would love trial by jury in just about every child contact case before the court. But even then, with the rules of evidence the way they are, juries too are mislead by the legalese because not all evidence can be presented. May I suggest Robert, a book by S Caroline Taylor, Court licensed abuse, its hard to get hold of but you may be lucky at the library. There is a fair bit on the wwww if you google. Anyway, what I was dumfounded to read was the excerpts from transcripts about how they question children, the whole process really. Shocking, and altho this book deals with interfamilial abuse, the techniques apply accross the board.

You will find another book " Girls like you" by Paul Sheehan about the gang rape trials have more of the same shocking behaviour by the legalese, all in the name of the legal 'dance'. These books may be about the assault of females, but it is no better for males who are victims of these crimes either. They really do help the lay person understand the legal system.

Regards
Linda Baker

----- Original Message -----
From: jhwilson
To: Robert ...................
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 9:27 AM
Subject: Family Court Juries Threat

Dear Robert,

An email that all Family Court Victims ought to read. Well done.

Settling family problems is best done within the family, if possible, of course. But, if they have to go to Court, then ONLY entrust the administration of Justice to a Jury. Past Family Court Victims can still go back to Court and demand all previous Judgments be struck out and the actions be tried by a Jury...it is their Right.

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.

----- Original Message -----
From: Robert ...................
To: jhwilson
Cc: Shared Parenting Council of Australia
Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2007 6:32 PM
Subject: Re: 1984 Practices in Canada

John

in the family court on thursday we continued to disagree on a way forward to release my children from their incarceration with their violent mother. Her solicitor and the so called independent child solicitor tried every bully tactic in the book including their last ditch attempt to bluff me with the threat of a trial. I laughed at them and said no problem but that will be a trial by jury thanks. Well you could have heard a pin drop. The child solicitor and the family consultant were agasp. I then left the meeting and waited for them to return to the court. When we went back in court I read the riot act to the Judge. She folded faster than superman's washing and despite the child solicitor claiming to be at a stalemate the judge demanded we reach a settlement without going to trial. She persisted until they gave me the consessions I was demanding. We reached an agreement that is on tenterhooks. I warned them that in no uncertain terms if I get wind of even the slightest problem during the hand over process with my kids then I will have them all back in court quicker than they can say trial by jury.

Interesting developments indeed. The judiciary are clearly frightened or intimidated by my evidence and approach to their corrupt court system. The SPCA has been notified and it would appear that all disenfranchised fathers need to start demanding trial by jury in the family court which in my view is the federal version of the district court and should have a jury box in every court room.

Regards

Robert ................ parent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Joe,

Common Law is made by the People, by way of Trials by Juries and Referenda.

When were the Referenda when the People adopted those Constitutions as Common Law?

Are Amendments to those Constitutions also put to Referenda?

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
PS: See s.128 of the Australian Constitution for the role of Referenda in altering it.

----- Original Message -----
From: joseph ....................
To: jhwilson
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 1:19 AM
Subject: Re: Jury reform needed

Hi John, The U.S. Constitution and the UNION State Constitutions are Common Law, because it gets it authority from " We the People " which was governmet was instituted to secure and protect the RIGHTS GOD Almighty gives us, HIS children, for a government Of, By and For the PEOPLE which is COMMON LAW !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!-------------------------Joe

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Dick,

Between your paragraphs are my comments in brackets:

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dick .............................
To: "jhwilson"
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 1:54 AM
Subject: John, I've been delegated to ask you: If 9-11 happened in Austrailia and there was strong evidence of an inside-job what would a power-of-juries-minded activist do

Dear Mr. Wilson.

John, I've been delegated to ask you: If 9-11 happened in Austrailia and there was strong evidence of an inside-job what would a power-of-juries-minded activist do?

(Gather an Australian People's Grand Jury to find for a true bill of Indictment against the Crown for Concealing a Serious Offence. When the Petit Jury was in place, subpoena witnesses to appear in that Court.)

And secondly, given what you know of the United States legal system, could the same course of action be pursued here.

(Yes.)

There are some very determined and capable people waiting for your answer -- I hope you will take at least a few moments to write down what you think might be a proper approach.

(As far as I know, there has not been any investigative procedure done at the People's or Common Law Level of Jurisdiction...only at the Bureaucratic or Statutory Level. I believe there is a move on this basis in the San Diego area... what's happening there...was it the 12th of April or is it the 12th of May for a "Citizens' Grand Jury" into 9-11?)

I realize you are not a US Constitutional lawyer -- but you have been telling us there is a higher common law.

(If the US is "the land of the Free", then Americans are Free men and have the Right to enforce their
"higher common law" which is by way of Trial by Jury. )

Please address any answer to a wide audience -- you answer will be widely distributed.

Thank you for all you are doing to show us our true protection in common law.

Dick Eastman

(We all up against the wall, in the US, Australia, Britain, Canada, etc., and the bullies are thumping the daylights out of us. So, we either fight back with the weapons our forefathers have passed on to us - or it's "Goodnight, nurse.")

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Jack,

I have a section on my website for People's Grand Juries... http://www.rightsandwrong.com.au/html/austpeople.html ... I have researched it a fair bit but, if you have more info, please send it on.

It's not a Common Law Court hearing .... it's a Common Law Referendum ... and one still needs to use the ordinary Courts to prosecute.

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.

----- Original Message -----
From: Jack ..................
To: jhwilson
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 9:43 AM
Subject: Re: Demon Ocracy

"People's Grand Juries "

Excellent. This sounds as if it is similar to a Common Law Court hearing.

I just did a search in my dictionary and found a whole lot of interesting articles about "People's Grand Juries".

Regards,

Jack...........

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Fred,

Without Trial by Jury, we are all lost.

The Canadian Indians ought to realize that, by now.

"The law of the land" is the Common Law...of, by and for the People.

Your Canadian Indians ought to empanel some People's Grand Juries and indict the Canadian Judges who deny them their Right to Trial by Jury. Those Indictments are then filed in the ordinary Courts, proceded with before Petit Juries and the Judges imprisoned.

Once we defeat the "evil counsellors, judges and ministers", then we can go after the Judges' masters, the Banks.

Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.

----- Original Message -----
From: "fred .........................
To:
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 12:42 AM
Subject: Demon Ocracy

Hi John ...

I read your posting about "democracy/demon ocracy" and thought I would pass a few thoughts your weigh ...

First of all, you have to reconcile re: the "Law of the Land" ... to my mind, the law of the land could only be the law of the people inhabiting the Island prior to it becoming the "penal colony" as did the Americas ...

next, under the "Canadian" laws when the common law conflicts with equity, equity ALWAYS prevails ... this can be found under s. 96 of the Courts of Justice Act R. S. O. (revised statutes of ontario) 1990 ... AND per "Black's 4th., Edition" you will find "latent or secret" under the head "equity" ...

Here is where it all comes together ...

In 1862 Lord Newcastle "arranged" loans, fraudulent loans, with the Fleet Street banksters ... in December 1867 that 12ML "debt" was coming due so there had to be a reorganization ... along comes the "British North Amercia ACt" which, more than likely, had to be approved/engineered by Disraeli ...

What went down was this; Prior to 1867 there existed the Indian Fund and the Consolidated Revenue Fund ... the Indian Fund contained our royalties ... the other, the revenues generated through taxation ...

In 1867 those two funds were consolidated as a money laundering scheme intended to fleece the Indians out of their royalties and to pay those royalties over to Fleet Street as payment for the fraudulent loans ... The same scenario was probably played out there as well ...

It appears either the Cainanites or Edomites (Jews as opposed to Judah) are running Vatican under the corporate banner "religion" ... Esau got "jewed" out of his birthright by Jacob and Esau, who became Edom, who became the Jew, now appears to be attempting to gain back the birthright ... The heads of state may very well be from german/Cainanite background and they are controlling "their" people until such time as Vatican sends in the troops/Islam ... I don't know if it is the same there as here but everywhere there is a catholic church a mosque is going up beside/kitty corner to the church ...

Of course, we cannot forget the "deal" John I and Innocent III pulled off in 1213 wherein the "KIng" bequithed all "royal" holdings to Vaticanus forever and a day ...

Just thought I would pass this info to you as there may have been the same "dealings" with the Maori etc. as it appears where ever Britiannia went death and destruction followed and this is because of Rothschild setting up the banking fraud with Wm. and Mary that, in turn, set up the "treadmill of
debt" which prevails today ... the solution, I believe, is to go after Lizzy herself and let her go after her "ministers" and the estates of Disraeli, Gladstone etc.

When the Anishinabe/Indians go to court here they claim sovereignty, they claim Royal Proclamation but the courts end up screwing them ... this is because of what is known as "casus omissus" ... the Indian's cases are omitted from being dealt with via Royal Proclamation 1763 and are proceeded
upon through the "common law" ... but, when the common law conflicts with Fleet Street's "equitable" interests, the Indian ALWAYS loses ... This casus omissus comes into play because the monarch, from 1763 to current, has chosen not to enact statutes intended to uphold the Royal Pledges ...
therefore, it is negligence on the part of the monarch and once the monarch has been put on notice it becomes criminal if she does nothing ... I have sent her a letter on 30 March of this year directing her to undertake just that action ... to enact statutes ...

BUT the Governor General, in "Canada" has the "authority" to do this and only commits to legal moves only AFTER consulting with her "legal" advisor ... the JAG, judge advocate general ... the JAG actually runs "Canada" ...

Remember, the banks control the "countries" ... the bankers, from the inner city of Londinium, send their agents to ensure their "equitable claims" are being satisfied ... and just who are their agents ??? ALL LAWYERS ARE AGENTS FOR THE BANKS!!! They are born here and are working for a foreign
jurisdiction to our detriment ... in short, they are, ALL OF THEM, traitors
...

The same crap ought to be happening in Oz as well ...

Too da Loo

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comments

ROD CLASS SUPREME COURT WIN

ROD CLASS SUPRMR COURT WIN

Rod Class falsely that "he won" "his" case at the Supreme Court. But, this is not so. Rod Class played no role whatsoever in the victory of his law firm at the Supreme Court. Class was not involved in that appeal in any way shape or form. Instead, Class' law firm (alone) merely used his case as a vehicle to change the law on constitutional appeals following guilty pleas in plea agreements (a subject that Class never knew about and never raised anywhere at any time in any case). Any other case involving a constitutional appeal following a guilty plea in a plea agreement would have served the same exact purpose as Class' case served here. Do not get fooled. For more, click here. http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?99447-Rod-Class-his-many-....

The "Judge DALE Hoax" is exposed in the THIRD (3rd) comment in the link above.

The NASA War Document Hoax is exposed in the NINETEENTH (19th) comment in the link above.

The Silent Weapons For Quiet Wars Hoax is exposed in the TWENTY SECOND (22nd) comment in the link above.

The Report From Iron Mountain Hoax is also exposed in the TWENTY SECOND (22nd) comment in the link above.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Support The Love For Life Campaign, Kindom & The Cristian Family

Supporting The Love For Life Website, The Cristian Family and The Living Dream Of Kindom (Creation Of Do No Harm Communities) - The Love for Life website is produced for free without a fee (no contract or conditions attached) as a gift of love for the benefit of others. If you feel you have gained something from visiting it, feel inspired, and would like to reciprocate as an equal exchange in substance and support (value), you are most welcome to make a gift of love to keep it and the dream of Kindom going. As always, we thank you for your gifts of love.

Additional Options

Bank:
Account name:
BSB:
Account number:
SWIFT BIC Code:
Australia New Zealand Banking Group (ANZ)
Fiona Caroline Cristian
012 547
5576 81376
ANZBAU3M

PAY PAL

Go To Your Pay Pal Account To Send Gifts To action @ loveforlife.com.au
Additional Options

 

The Cristian Family November 2006

We Stand For NO SYSTEM

Kindom (Do No Harm Communities) is the dream for freedom, but it is the dream for the freedom of those around us who also live the dream of freedom, because it is in living for the freedom of others that we get our freedom. When we live for the dreams of Kindom of those around us, we live life as a gift because we live for (dedicate our lives to) their dream of freedom, truth, peace, joy, abundance, etc, just as they live for our Kindom dreams too. This is true co-creation (cooperation) with no attack on the uniqueness of each of us. When we live this way, we have no need for any man-made system - everything/everyone has already been taken care of by our love for life.

Just as we do not have to jump 10 feet across the room to grab our next breath, neither do we have to worry about food, water and shelter because it has all been taken care of as we each co-create Kindoms/Kin-Domains for everyone. Now everybody and everything of the dream of life that is Kindom/Paradise is free (has been set free once again). The issue is greed and selfishness, power and control trips, arrogance, ignorance, being fed many many lies and being traumatised. The issue is not overpopulation - there is more than enough land available for every family to have a hectare (2.5 acres Kin-Domain) to care for. The land of Australia can provide a Kin-Domain for every family across Earth, each with a food forest, clean fresh drinking water and plenty of space for building natural do no harm habitats and with plenty of land left over.

Everyone must have the freedom to take full-responsibility for their lives, for the water they drink, the food they eat and for their shelter. Currently, "The System" forces everyone to give up taking full-responsibility so that we become grown up children accustomed to sucking on the nipples of "The System" corporations for everything, having to use money to get by and to follow the rules of money because we are not co-creating freedom, peace, truth, joy and abundance for each other. Money only leads to haves and have nots and all the abuse, manipulation and distractions that we are subjected to as slaves to money.

When we give up living for other's Kindom dreams, we start creating hell ("The System") all around us because we become self-centred - now it's all about "my freedom","my money", "my land", "my belief", "my saviour", "mine", "mine","mine", "i","i", "i", "own", "own", "own", etc. To protect what we claim we own requires a man-made system with FORCE to protect those self-centred claims. This is ALL trauma based and all story-telling (brainwashing/braindirtying).

NO SYSTEM = KINDOM/DO NO HARM COMMUNITIES
NO SYSTEM = KINDOM/DO NO HARM COMMUNITIES photo Kindom_zpsa6d24e8a.jpg

Our true freedom comes when we set our thoughts of freedom into motion so that we live freedom rather than just talking and thinking about it while we still slave for "The System". Kindom will not happen while we meditate for hours in the bush or do yoga retreats or wait for Jesus or follow the processes of the OPPT (One People's Public Trust now called One People). This is not freedom because we are not living freedom because we are living the story-telling of Jesus or Zeitgeist or The Secret or Thrive or One Earth/Consciousness/People.

Living Kindom is very, very hard work as we set about repairing the damage to MAN/Earth/Nature that we are ALL responsible for but the burden becomes lighter the more of us put our life-energy into the dream of returning Earth to Paradise. Day-after-day, we all have to work our arses off until Kindom is all around us (MAN) once again. This is the price we pay to set each other free on a piece of land (Kin-Domain), so that no one is under the image-power (education/brainwashing/story-telling) of another MAN anymore and so that everyone can have their space of love to create and live their unique, do no harm dreams. This only happens once we have the Kindoms set up so that everyone is provided for.

Once we re-create the food forests, whether on land or in the suburbs, we can re-claim our freedom, breaking the strangle-hold of "The System" because we are no longer reliant on its services and benefits and no longer turning each other into slaves of "The System", cogs in the wheels of "The System" machine. If we don't put the effort in to set everyone and everything free all around us then we still live in HELL ("The System"). The key is to live for everyone else's freedom so that we can have it too.

From Bare Dirt To Abundance
A Year In The Life Of The
Love For Life Food Forest

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
8th February 2013
51 Minutes 46 Seconds
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1sJCcCvZ97A

From Bare Dirt To Abundance Part Two A
5th November 2014
http://youtu.be/TPTPn8tgcPI
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8545

From Bare Dirt To Abundance Part Two B
Coming Shortly

We live for NO SYSTEM. We do not lose anything by not having a man-made system and, in fact, we gain. We gain our freedom and we gain abundance. Let go of the fear.

The Cristian Family November 2006

A Collection Of Various Love For Life Posts
Providing The Big Picture We See

Sequential Order

We ask you to NOT believe anything we say/share and instead use scrutiny like an intense blow torch and go where the logic of truth/sense takes you. This is very, very important. Put everything you believe up to the test of scrutiny to see how it stacks up. If you are true to your heart/senses and go where the logic of truth/sense takes you will find that NO belief, etc, will stand up to the test of scrutiny. They just do not stack up because they are lies/fraud.

After you have watched and read all the material and any questions are left unanswered, send us your landline number and we will use the internet phone as a free unlimited call. We are on Sydney NSW Australia time. Best times for us to chat are between 11.00am and 6.00pm.

It is critical that you fully comprehend Image Power, "Spelling", Trauma, Reaction To Trauma, Curses, Processing Curses, Full-Responsibility/Liability, Limited Liability/Responsibility (passing-the-back), Slavery, Senses/Sense vs Non-Sense/Senses, Re-Presenting Intellectual Property such as but not limited to "Name", Storytelling/Storytellers, Duality, Black-Magic, Belief, Lies, "i", All Seeing "i" (eye), etc..... These themes and others are covered over and over and over again.

If you do not comprehend these insights and are unable to use your senses to sense your way through all the non-sense/non-sensory-images that enslave MAN under their image power (darkness = "The System" = Hell), men and women will remain deeply trapped under a terrible state of trauma. Our intention is to inspire you to remedy by showing you how to move away from reacting to trauma in all its nefarious and devious forms.

IMAGE POWER
Superb Diamond Range Interviewing
Arthur & Fiona Cristian 4th February 2014
http://youtu.be/qFnuuw3kLog
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8501

His-Story/Her-Story (History)
Arthur Cristian - Love For Life
2005-2007 - Re-posted July 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8529

The Dream Of Life Part 6
Under The Spell Of Intellectual Property

Arthur Cristian - 51 Minutes 52 Seconds
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IMK7CkU1ih8

Trauma Induced Fantasy
July 2013 Interview With
Jeanice Barcelo And Arthur & Fiona Cristian
http://youtu.be/CZVj-ddUoZw
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8500

The Dark Side Of The Moon
The Background To "The System"

Arthur & Fiona Cristian Interviewed By
Jahnick Leaunier, The Tru-Mon Show
24th August 2016
Love For Life - 142 Minutes
https://youtu.be/C5TViw1NLr4

Eric Dubay's Flat Earth Is A Cult
The Background To The System Part Two

Arthur & Fiona Cristian Chatting With
Jahnick Leaunier On The Tru-Mon Show
Love For Life - 31st August 2016
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8585
154 Minutes
https://youtu.be/rCPWgEQg-2M

Eclipse Of The Sun - Video (Arthur swears in this video)
The Background To The System Part Three
Arthur & Fiona Cristian Chatting With
Jahnick Leaunier On The Tru-Mon Show
Love For Life - 25th October 2016
https://youtu.be/FMOsOi1kNRc

The "Name" Is The Mark Of The Beast
The Strawman Identifying
Your Slave Status In "The System"

By Arthur Cristian - Love For Life
5th February 2012 - 56 Minutes 25 Seconds
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DdOag66v7uo

The Satanic Craft Of Inculcation In Practice
Fiona's ACT Supreme Court Affidavit Explaining Inculcation & Illumination
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
4th March 2016
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8578

The Spinning Top
Full Bloom Inculcation

Arthur And Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
Facebook Discussions Between The
8th December 2016
And
26th January 2017
Link: http://loveforlife.com.au/content/16/03/04/satanic-craft-inculcation-pra...

The Shit Of Death
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
28th January 2017
Link: http://loveforlife.com.au/content/16/03/04/satanic-craft-inculcation-pra...

The Selfie Of Freakenstein
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
17th March 2017
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8588

Three Sets Of Fiona Cristian Documents Filed With ACAT
Merged Into One Document For Downloading
https://www.scribd.com/document/327370355/Fiona-Cristian-Affidavit-ACT-S...

Fiona Cristian Affidavit
ACT Supreme Court / Court Of Appeal

https://www.scribd.com/doc/316218306/Three-Sets-of-Fiona-Cristian-Docume...

Dancing With Magic (Lies)
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Videos, Articles, Comments
And Pending E-Book
Love Fort Life
September 2015
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8575

Dancing With Magic Part One
Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life
5th September 2015
https://youtu.be/hx7qJ7r2OS4

Dancing With Magic Part Two
Arthur Cristian - Love For Life
12th September 2015
https://youtu.be/b_KuEFdKmnA

Dancing With Magic Part Three
Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life
13th September 2015
https://youtu.be/9pJc1NfnAcI

Dancing With Magic (Lies) Part Four:
Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life
16th September 2015
https://youtu.be/kSVURGwm1Go

Introduction To Kindom Video
By Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life
6th March 2015
https://youtu.be/7SspPm9wRgo

To Be Educated Is To Have No Soul
The System Is Soul Destroying

Frederick Malouf & Michael Tellinger's
Contrived Gifting
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
1st September 2016
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8586

Illumination IS Definition
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
26th to 29th January 2016
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8577

IMAGE POWER
The Nefarious Tactics Used
To Disguise Truth And Distract Us
From Remedy

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
24th January 2014
This post contains many recent Facebook comments
and email replies which collectively provides a big picture
into exposing the deception behind IMAGE POWER.
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8496

The Pull Of E-Motion
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
8th February 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8499

Processing Curses
A Lie Is A Curse
Liars Process Curses

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
26th February 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8503

How The System Is Really Constructed
Bouncing Back Curses Upon Curse Makers
To Stop Harm Forevermore

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
27th February 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8504

Slave To A Name
Parts One, Two, Three, Four,
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
3rd to 6th March 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8505

Educated Slaves
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
20th March 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8506

The Only Path To Freedom
Beware The False Steps

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 2nd April 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8508

Free-Dumb For All
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 5th April 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8510

Revoking The Ego
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 8th April 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8511

How MAN Commits Spiritual Suicide
Arthur Cristian
Love For Life - 3rd April 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8509

How To Detect Intel Operatives Working
For The New World Order Agenda
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 10th April 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8512

How The Psyop Program & Intel Networks
Are Messing With Your Head +
His-Story/Her-Story

Arthur & Fiona Cristian - April 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8513

Godzilla Through The Looking Glass
Destroyed By Name"

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 20th April 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8514

What It's Going To Take
To Co-Create Freedom Forevermore

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 22nd April 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8514

Falling For Fairy Stories
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 24th April 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8514

A Disassociation From The Work
Of Kate of Gaia

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 17th May 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8517

Separating The Wheat From The Chaff
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 22nd May 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8516

Revolution Or Revolution
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 25th May 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8520

Routing Out Psyop Programs
Routs Out Intel Operatives
Exposing Max Igan's Psyop Program

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 31st May 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8524

The Psyop Program Scam
Behind Religion Belief Faith
& Associated Opinion

Arthur Cristian
Love For Life
11th June 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8525

Another Delusion
Arthur Cristian
Love For Life
11th June 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8526

A World Of Words Is A World Of Lies
Arthur Cristian
Love For Life
13th June 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8527

E-MAN
The Name Of The Beast Is MAN

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 9th May 2014
Includes Mountain MAN Arrested
Facebook Discussion About "Name"
Uploaded 25th June 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8528

E-Motion
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 13th August 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8537

Discussion With Brother Gregory
Clearly Demonstrating Christianity
Is Part Of The Problem
And Not The Solution

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
Between the 12th May 2014 and 30th August 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8542

The Psyop Program Behind Free Food
And Permaculture

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
29th October 2014
Facebook Discussion With Unconditional Love Moon
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8544

Head So Strong
Music and Vocals Arthur Cristian
Backing Vocals and Vocal Effects Arthur Cristian & Hannah Wood
Lyrics Fiona and Arthur Cristian
Written during our spare time between Aug & Oct 2014
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OG4UQCTsqwU

The Time Of Trauma That Destroys Us
Arthur Cristian - Love For Life
9th November 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8547

The Most Powerful Video On Spirituality
And Happiness FOR SLAVES
Or
How To Accept Slavery And Be Happy About It

Arthur Cristian - Love For Life
6th August 2014
Facebook Discussion About The Work Of Eckhart Tolle
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8548

What Can We Do What Can We See
Arthur Cristian - Love For Life
A series of Arthur Cristian Facebook
posts and discussions
between 17th and 21st November 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8552

The Misuse Of Love By Intel Networks
To Create Doubt And Uncertainty
With The Intention To Destroy Love
And Therefore Destroy MAN
(True Freedom, Peace, Joy, Abundance And Truth
For Everyone)

By Arthur Cristian - Love For Life
26th November 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8554

The Void Of E-GO That Is Spiritual Suicide
The Justification Of Laziness
That Perpetuates System Creature Comforts
Ensuring Our Fall

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
13th December 2014
Massive Update Occurred 14th Dec 2014 3.10pm Sydney Aust time
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8556

Darkness Visible Part One A, B, C, D
The Freemasonic World In Plain Sight
Decoding George Washington Lithographs

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
14th December 2014
Part One A http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8557
Part One B http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8567
Part One C http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8568
Part One D http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8569

Darkness Visible Part Two
Yin And Yang, Duality, Spiritual Suicide
And Frank O'Collins UCADIA / One Heaven

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
14th December 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8558

Darkness Visible Part Three
How The Word Sausage
Re-Presents The New World Order
Boiling Point & Out To Get Us

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
27th December 2014
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8560

Darkness Visible Part Four
Aleister Crowley - Thelema - OTO
And The Black Magic Psychedelia Of The Intellect

Facebook Discussion
4th to 10th January 2015
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8561

Darkness Visible Part Five
Living MAN Fiona Cristian's Standing
+ Decoding Judeo/Judaism

Fiona Cristian & Arthur Cristian
Love For Life
24th January 2015
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8562

Darkness Visible Part Six
The Many Fingers Of The Hidden Hand Appearing
YouTube Community Flagged A Video
Posted To The ArthurLoveForLife YouTube Channel
As Being "Hate Speech"

Fiona Cristian & Arthur Cristian
Love For Life
4th February 2015
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8563

Darkness Visible Part Seven
The Full Responsibility For Setting
True Freedom For All Into Motion
In Present-Sense Forevermore

Fiona Cristian & Arthur Cristian
Love For Life
10th February 2015
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8564

Who We Really Are Does Not End
At The Surface Of Our Skin

Arthur Cristian & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 22nd February 2015
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8565

Introduction To Kindom Video
By Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life
6th March 2015
https://youtu.be/7SspPm9wRgo

The Rot Parts One, Two, Three
Arthur Cristian
Love For Life
5th June 2015
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8571

"The Good Guys" And The "Bad Guys"
Working Together To Bring In
The New World Order

Arthur Cristian - 18th July 2015
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8572

Can You Spot The Ego?
Where's Wally? Part One

Compilation of Facebook & Youtube
Insight Posts During Aug/Sept 2015
By Arthur Cristian
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8573

Can You Spot The Ego?
Where's Wally? Part Two

Compilation of Facebook & Youtube
Insight Posts During Aug/Sept 2015
By Arthur Cristian
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8576

Dancing With Magic (Lies)
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Videos, Articles, Comments
And Pending E-Book
Love Fort Life
September 2015
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8575

Dancing With Magic Part One
Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life
5th September 2015
https://youtu.be/hx7qJ7r2OS4

Dancing With Magic Part Two
Arthur Cristian - Love For Life
12th September 2015
https://youtu.be/b_KuEFdKmnA

Dancing With Magic Part Three
Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life
13th September 2015
https://youtu.be/9pJc1NfnAcI

Dancing With Magic (Lies) Part Four:
Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life
16th September 2015
https://youtu.be/kSVURGwm1Go

Illumination IS Definition
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
26th to 29th January 2016
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8577

The Satanic Craft Of Inculcation In Practice
Fiona's ACT Supreme Court Affidavit Explaining Inculcation & Illumination
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
4th March 2016
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8578

The Dark Side Of The Moon
The Background To "The System" Part One

Arthur & Fiona Cristian Chatting With
Jahnick Leaunier On The Tru-Mon Show
Love For Life - 24th August 2016
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8583

Eric Dubay's Flat Earth Is A Cult
The Background To The System Part Two

Arthur & Fiona Cristian Chatting With
Jahnick Leaunier On The Tru-Mon Show
Love For Life - 31st August 2016
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8585

To Be Educated Is To Have No Soul
The System Is Soul Destroying
Frederick Malouf & Michael Tellinger's
Contrived Gifting

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
1st September 2016
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8586

New Love For Life Kindom Facebook Group
Started March 2015
https://www.facebook.com/groups/1434747556816918
Includes 63 Minute
Introduction To Kindom Video
https://youtu.be/7SspPm9wRgo
By Arthur & Fiona Cristian
and
Facebook Kindom Group Guidelines
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8566
The Love For Life website home-page provides
the bigger-picture background to the themes
touched on in this video: http://loveforlife.com.au

Crop Circles Are A Massive Hoax
Facebook Discussion On Simon Kawai's Wall
Involving Arthur & Fiona Cristian
31st August 2013
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8470

OPPT & Slavery Through Intellectual Conscription By Deceit
Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life
27th February 2013 onwards...
Part One: http://youtu.be/Qjp_9nlrBao
Part Two: http://youtu.be/tbybeOWZ-Bc
Part Three: http://youtu.be/yOWoxH-HbVw

Water Is The Life Of MANS Consciousness (Breath)
Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life - 8th February 2013
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8350
Part One: http://youtu.be/4ze66_33wxM - 70 Minutes 5 Seconds
Part Two: http://youtu.be/43gIi-sjxJc - 81 Minutes 13 Seconds
Part Three: http://youtu.be/oooY6W63K-M - 70 Minutes 18 Seconds

What Do You Believe On Origins?
Who Said There Was A Beginning?
Who's Truth Do You Accept?
Belief Is A Strange Idea.

Discussion Lyndell, Scott and Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Between March and April 2013
Posted 29th October 2013
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8487

So You Want The Good Bits Of "The System"
But Not The Bad Bits?

By Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life - 12th August 2013
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8468

Turning Away From The Reflection
Of MANS Looking Glass

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
30th April 2013
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8404

REMEDY

From Bare Dirt To Abundance
A Year In The Life Of The
Love For Life Food Forest

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
8th February 2013
51 Minutes 46 Seconds
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1sJCcCvZ97A

From Bare Dirt To Abundance Part Two
5th November 2014
http://youtu.be/TPTPn8tgcPI
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8545

From Bare Dirt To Abundance Part Three
7th March 2016
60 Minutes
https://youtu.be/SH9i8ZStzWI

Love For Life Food Forest & Native Garden March 2016
Extension Of The Love For Life Food Forest And Establishment
Of A New Native Garden At The Front Of The Rental Property
In East Bowral - 24th October 2015 to Mid February 2016.
15 Minutes
https://youtu.be/y-Uz8HmnSIM

Control The Land
And You Control MAN On The Land
Displace MAN From Land
And You Turn MAN Into Slaves

Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life
April 2011 (Updated 14th September 2011)
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8237

The Divine Spark
Facebook Discussion With Raymond Karczewski
Arthur & Fiona Cristian & Others
2nd October 2013
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8483

Capturing Another MANS Uniqueness
A Facebook Debate With
Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life
And Raymond Karczewski
Starting 13th May 2013
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8414

The Spell Is Broken
Taking The Land To Create Kindom

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
3rd March 2013
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8365

The Steps Of Kindom
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life 2006/2007
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8304

To explore these themes in greater detail go here where you can find links to all our Love For Life comments, articles, debates, discussions, videos, podcasts, etc: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/3385

All the best
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life

Website: http://loveforlife.com.au
Email : action@loveforlife.com.au
Mobile : 0011 61 418 203204 - (0418 203204)
Snail Mail: PO Box 1320 Bowral 2576 NSW Australia
Facebook Arthur Cristian : http://www.facebook.com/arthurcristian
YouTube Arthur Cristian : http://www.youtube.com/ArthurLoveForLife

Register To The Love For Life Mailing List: http://loveforlife.com.au/content/09/05/14/mailing-list

Facebook Group Why Aren't We Free Discussion : http://www.facebook.com/164918753537287
Facebook Group Kindom/Do No Harm Community Discussion : http://www.facebook.com/151811728195925

Links below will kick in when the professionally recorded Love For Life music is released.

SoundCloud : http://soundcloud.com/loveforlife
Nimbit Music : http://www.nimbitmusic.com/loveforlife
Twitter : https://twitter.com/loveforlifemusi
Facebook Music : http://www.facebook.com/loveforlifemusic
YouTube Love For Life Music : http://www.myspace.com/loveforlifemusic
MySpace : http://www.myspace.com/loveforlifemusic
Google + Fiona Cristian : https://plus.google.com/100490175160871610090

Peaceful Transition Through Sacrifice And Service

We feel there is an essential peaceful do no harm transition required to get all of MAN back to standing on MANS feet without reliance upon another MAN for water, food, shelter. As it stands everyone in "The System" are highly dependent and reliant on the "group mind-set" that forms "The System" of slaves providing services and benefits for the emotionally addicted slaves to "The System" (and you can put us in the same basket too). The transition is to get MAN back to relying ONLY on nature without 3rd party interlopers, intermeddlers, interceders getting in the way. The transition is a team effort with the foresight for setting all of MAN free down-the-line so that MAN is no longer dependent on slaves and masters providing services, benefits, privileges and exclusivity while being bound to contracts, rituals, procedures, conditions, rules & regulations which compromises MAN severely.

This transition is all about shifting from limited liability/responsibility to full liability/responsibility. This full responsibility is all about caring for our health, nature all around us, clean uncorrupted (pure) water and food, partner/co-creator, children, shelter, animal-friends in partnership, etc. In "The System", we are already together destroying each other - we have to come together to create peace together so that we can all have peace. We cannot live peacefully when we are islands, not taking full responsibility for the lives of those around us until EVERYONE can take full responsibility for their life, which means that EVERYONE is healed of system trauma. In "The System", we all come together to make slaves of each other - now is the moment to come together to set each other free, to live for each other's freedom, peace, joy and abundance. Once we have set each other free, we are free.

Control The Land
And You Control MAN On The Land
Displace MAN From Land
And You Turn MAN Into Slaves

Arthur & Fiona Cristian - Love For Life
April 2011 (Updated 14th September 2011)
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8237

The Spell Is Broken
Taking The Land To Create Kindom

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
3rd March 2013
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8365

"The Steps Of Kindom"
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8304

---------

Once we fix these issues, we or our children or our descendants to come, can start focusing on the even bigger picture of getting back to where our ancestors were, as breatharyan's, before they fell into non-sense images to be enslaved by them.

All the best to you and your family
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life

The Cristian Family November 2006

The Cristian Family Declaration

The Cristian family and The Love for Life Campaign are apolitical, non-religious, non-violent, anti weapons, anti drugs (both pharmaceutical and recreational) and anti any ideology that denies the existence of Do No Harm Communities (Kindoms) and suppresses the uniqueness and freedom of all men, women and children.

The Cristian family and our Love For Life work is unaligned to any big business corporation, intelligence agency, government body, "system" law, "system" think tanks, "system" green or environmental movements, religion, cult, sect, society (fraternity, brotherhood, sisterhood, order, club, etc,) secret or not, hidden agenda, law or sovereignty group, occult, esoteric, New Age or Old Age.

The Cristian family supports and promotes the remedy that brings an everlasting peace, freedom, truth, joy, abundance and do no harm for all of life without causing loss of uniqueness or the need for having slaves and rulers. We are not into following the one in front or being shepherds for sheeple. Most importantly, we take full-responsibility for everything we think, feel and do.

The Cristian family are not Christians.

Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life

December 2006

The Cristian Family November 2006

THE CRISTIAN FAMILY PLEDGE

Being of clear brain, heart and intention, we each declare the following to be true:

• We have no intention of ending our own lives.

• We will not tolerate suppression of truth, ideas, freedom, or our work. We stand for freedom of speech.

• We stand together to support others in the expression of truths and freedom to speak out no matter how radical those ideas may seem.

• Standing for freedom takes courage; together we shall be strong in the face of all odds.

• If it is ever claimed that we have committed suicide, encountered an unfortunate accident, died of sickness/disease, disappeared, been institutionalized, or sold out financially or in any other way to self-interested factions, we declare those claims false and fabricated.

• We testify, assert and affirm without reservation, on behalf of all those who have dedicated their lives to the ending of secrecy and the promotion of freedom of thought, ideas and expression that we shall prevail.

• We Do Not Have Multiple Personality Disorders

Arthur Cristian
Fiona Cristian
Jasmin Lily Cristian
Emma Rose Cristian
Frances Hannah Cristian
Xanthe Jane Cristian

15th December 2006 (Edited/Updated 18th September 2011)

The Cristian Family November 2006

Update Regarding The Love For Life
Home Page And Quick User Guide

We are turning the Love for Life Quick User Guide http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6608 into a blog of all the main insights of our work since March 2005, whether through articles, videos, podcasts or discussions/debates.

As we do not have the time to compile everything we have written into a book, as many have suggested we do, compiling all our most important work into one area of the website is a way of providing easy access to this work so those interested are able to fully comprehend the big picture.

Instead of having to find our different articles, videos, etc, in various parts of the website, it will all be accessible here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6608 and here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/3385.

Love For Life Videos

As amateurs and posted in the Quick User Guide below the Facebook links, we're currently creating and posting a series of videos called "The Dream Of Life" which covers the ground of all the Love For Life insights. We plan to have the videos completed by December 31st 2012. Once this is behind us, our intention is to create a 2 hour or so video covering the body of this work. All videos are embedded in the quick user guide http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6608 and uploaded in Arthur's YouTube channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/ArthurLoveForLife.

Love For Life Music

We have started recording songs, with others, that express the themes of Love For Life. They are now being posted on Arthur's YouTube channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/ArthurLoveForLife and are embedded in the quick user guide http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6608. We have over 100 songs to record. A few rough demos have already been used as the soundtrack on the first "Dream of Life" video.

About Us - Love For Life & The Cristian Family

Also, everything we, the Cristian family, have gone through, from bank fraud and the theft of the family home to death threats and attempts on Arthur's life, is documented in the Quick User Guide too. If you, the reader, are prepared to put the effort in, you will comprehend the extent to which we have all been tricked into becoming slaves, giving up our uniqueness and our full-responsibility for life and destroying everything of life to the point where life is in danger of dying out completely. You will also comprehend the remedy to all this chaos; a remedy that requires only love for life and the determination to do what needs to be done. Though our focus is very strongly on the remedy that creates a world of freedom, truth, peace, joy, abundance and Do No Harm for all of life without loss of uniqueness or the need for slaves and rulers, we realise that it is vital to comprehend how to get there and what stops us from getting there. This is why there is so much information on the hows and whys of everything going wrong in the world today. We are not into peddling conspiracy theories, we are into routing out all forms of organised crime.

Saturday 26th November 2011

Arthur and Fiona Cristian
Love For Life

Website: http://loveforlife.com.au
Email: action@loveforlife.com.au
Mobile: 0011 61 418 203204 - (0418 203204)
Facebook Arthur Cristian: http://www.facebook.com/arthurcristian
YouTube Arthur Cristian: http://www.youtube.com/ArthurLoveForLife
SoundCloud: http://soundcloud.com/loveforlife
Nimbit Music: http://www.nimbitmusic.com/loveforlife
Twitter: https://twitter.com/loveforlifemusi
Facebook Music: http://www.facebook.com/loveforlifemusic
Facebook Why Aren't We Free Discussion: http://www.facebook.com/164918753537287
Facebook Do No Harm Community: http://www.facebook.com/151811728195925
YouTube Love For Life Music: http://www.myspace.com/loveforlifemusic
MySpace: http://www.myspace.com/loveforlifemusic
Google + Fiona Cristian: https://plus.google.com/100490175160871610090
Register To The Love For Life Mailing List: http://loveforlife.com.au/content/09/05/14/mailing-list

1. For The Body Of The Love For Life Work by Arthur and Fiona Cristian

Which Unravels The Reasons For The Chaos, Mayhem and Confusion Being Experienced In The World Today, Explains The Need For "Community Immunity" and Responsibility, and Focuses On The Creation Of Kindoms - Do No Harm, Life-Sustainable Communities (As The Remedy That Heals All Mans Woes) - And How We Can Co-Create Them. For Comments, Articles And Discussions, Go Here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/3385 - Also Go Here To See Podcasts And Videos Posted by Arthur & Fiona Cristian: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/7309 - The Information Shared Comes From Inspiration, Intuition, Heartfelt-Logic And Information Gathered From Nature And Many Amazing Men And Women Along The Way. It Is Not Found In Any Books Or Channellings, Or Talked About By "Experts". Go Here To Read A Brief Synopsis Of Why We Started Love For Life: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8182

2. For Information About The Ringing Cedars of Russia Series

go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/1125 and for more on Eco Homes, Villages, Organic and Permaculture Gardening and Life-Sustainability, etc, go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/3641 and here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/1985 and Mikhail Petrovich Shchetinin - Kin's School - Lycee School at Tekos: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/5173

3. For How To Eat A Raw, Living Food Diet,

go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/5068 - LIFE is information. When we distort LIFE and then eat, drink, absorb, think, feel, hear, see, touch, taste, smell and perform these distortions, the information of LIFE, your LIFE, our LIFE, our children's lives, everyone's LIFE, is distorted.

4. To Find A Menu For The Extensive Research Library (over 8,000 items posted embodying over 11,000 documents, pdf's, videos, podcasts, etc)

Which Covers Topics From Health to Chemtrails/Haarp to Brain Control to Archaeology to Astronomy Geocentricity Heliocentricity to Pandemics Bird Flu Swine Flu to Fluoride to Cancer to Free Energy to Global Warming, 9/11, Bali Bombings, Aspartame, MSG, Vaccinations, Aids/HIV, Mercury, New World Order, Satanism, Religions, Cults, Sects, Symbolism, etc, etc, go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/82

5. If You Would Like To Read About The Cristian Family NSW Supreme Court Case

(Macquarie Bank/Perpetual Limited Bank Fraud Condoned By Judges, Registrars, Barristers, Lawyers, Politicians, Public Servants, Bureaucrats, Big Business and Media Representatives - A Crime Syndicate/Terrorist Organisation) Which Prompted The Creation Of This Love For Life Website December 2006, And The Shooting And Torture Of Supporters Who Assisted Us In Reclaiming The Family Home, Joe Bryant And His Wife, Both In Their Late 70's, go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/5 And Read Some Of Our Email Correspondence With Lawyer Paul Kean - Macedone Christie Willis Solari Partners - Miranda Sydney May 17th-June 27th 2006: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/7300

6. For The Stories Of Other Victims Of The System,

go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/australian_stories (If you have a story you would like us to put up, we would love to here from you:
action @ loveforlife.com.au)

7. For Documentation Of Harm Done By The Powers-That-Be And Their Representatives,

Evidence Revealing How Victims Did Not Break The Peace, Caused No Crime or Harm, There Were No Injured Parties. Documenting Incontrovertible Evidence Demonstrating How The Powers That Be (PTB) And Their Lackeys Will Break All The Laws They Are Supposed To Uphold. They Will Kidnap, Intimidate, Terrorise, Rape, Pillage, Plunder And Lie And Take Responsibility For None Of It. All Part Of Their Tactics Of Using Fear And Trauma To Keep Us In Our Place. Relatives Of Those Under Their Radar Are Also Not Safe From Attack And Intimidation. All Starting From A $25 Fine For Not Voting And A $65 Fine For Not Changing A Dog Registration. We Do Not Have Freedom And Can Only Appear To Have Freedom If We Comply. Regardless How Small The Matter The PTB Throw Hundreds Of Thousands Of Dollars Away To Enforce Their Will.... Go Here:
Fiona Cristian Reply To State Debt Recovery Office - Part One to Part Ten - From 17th October 2008 And Still Continuing:
http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6319 or
Fiona Cristian Reply To State Debt Recovery Office
Part One: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/5742 - From 17th October 2008
Part Two: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6135 - From 18th December 2008
Part Three: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6295 - From 9th January 2009
Part Four: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6296 - From 14th January 2009
Part Five: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6375 - The Sick Puppy - From 20th February 2009
Part Six: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6390 - Police Officers, Sheriff’s Officers, Tow Truck Driver and State Debt Recovery Office Blatantly Ignore the Law To Rape, Pillage and Plunder The Private Property Of Fiona Cristian - From 11th March 2009
Part Seven: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6445 - Affidavit Of Truth - Letter To The Queen + Australia: Fascism is Corporatism - From 30th March 2009
Part Eight: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6652 - The Pirates Auction And The Ghost Of VSL386 - From 4th April 2009
Part Nine: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/7073 - Arthur Cristian's Letter To Pru Goward MP - From 15th December 2009
Part Ten: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/7500 - Should We Be In Fear Of Those Who Claim To Protect Us? "Roman Cult" Canon Law - Ecclesiastical Deed Poll - The Work Of Frank O'Collins - From 13th October 2010

8. If You Are Interested In Information On Freedom From Statutes, Rule-Of-Law, Free Man/Free Woman, Strawman, "Person" and Admiralty Law (The Law Of Commerce),

go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/895 - For Common Law, Democracy, Constitution, Trial By Jury, Fee Simple, etc, go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/category/main/law-articles-documents

9. If You Are Interested In Banking and Money Created (Fiat/Credit/Debt/Mortgage/Loan/Overdraft etc) Out-Of-Thin-Air, How Banks Counterfeit Money,

go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/banks

10. For A List Of All The Latest Posts In The Love For Life Website,

go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/tracker

11. For Links To Many Hundreds Of Videos, DVDs And Podcasts

go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/video_dvd

12. To See The Cristian Family Pledge, Legal and other Disclaimers

go here: http://loveforlife.com.au/content/06/12/05/love-life-legal-disclaimer

13. To Read About How A Representative Of The NSW Jewish Board Of Deputies Had Threatened To Shut Down The Love For Life Website

go here: Part One: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6616 Part Two: THE STEVE JOHNSON REPORT AND VIDEO: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6665 and Part Three: Latest Update On James Von Brunn: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6673

Conscious Love Always
Arthur & Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
action @ loveforlife.com.au
www.loveforlife.com.au
0418 203204 (int: 0011 61 418 203204)
PO Box 1320 Bowral 2576 NSW Australia

Arthur Cristian

Create Your Badge

Love For Life Discussions - Why Aren't We Free? How Can We Be Free?

Promote your Page too

The Cristian Family November 2006

Love For Life Legal Disclaimer

The information contained on this world wide web site (the web site and all information herein shall be collectively referred to as "Web Site Information"), under the registered url name, loveforlife.com.au, resides on a host server environment in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15203, United States of America.

The Web Site Information has been prepared to provide general information only and is not intended to constitute or be construed as providing substantive professional advice or opinion on any facts or circumstances. Transmission of the information is not intended to create, nor does its receipt give rise to, a professional-client relationship between 'Love for Life' and the receiver.

While every care has been taken to ensure the accuracy and timeliness of the information prepared and/or reported on this site, 'Love for Life' is not responsible for any errors or omissions or for the Web Site Information not being up to date. The Web Site Information may not reflect the most current developments.

The impact of the law, policy and/or procedure for any particular situation depends on a variety of factors; therefore, readers should not act upon any Web Site Information without seeking professional advice. 'Love for Life' is not responsible for any action taken in reliance on any Web Site Information herein.

'Love for Life' is not responsible for any action you or others take which relies on information in this website and/or responses thereto. 'Love for Life' disclaim all responsibility and liability for loss or damage suffered by any person relying, directly or indirectly, on the Web Site Information, including in relation to negligence or any other default.

'Love for Life' does not warrant, represent or hold out that any Web Site Information will not cause damage, or is free from any computer virus, defect(s) or error(s). 'Love for Life' is not liable to users for any loss or damage however caused resulting from the use of material found on its web site.

'Love for Life' does not necessarily endorse or approve of any Web Site Information linked to and contained on other web sites linked herein and makes no warranties or representations regarding the merchantability or fitness for purpose, accuracy and quality, of any such information.

The sending of information by you, and the receipt of it by 'Love for Life', is not intended to, and does not, create a professional-client relationship.

All Web Site Information is considered correct at the time of the web site's most recent revision.

ADDITIONAL DISCLAIMER

THE CRISTIAN FAMILY SUPPORTS
FREEDOM OF SPEECH - FREEDOM OF THOUGHT

The Cristian Family November 2006

Posted Wednesday 17th June 2009
Updated September 2011

NSW Jewish Board Of Deputies
Has Threatened To Shut Down
The Love For Life Website

No Freedom Of Speech - No Freedom Of Thought

Love For Life does not support harm doing in any shape or form. However, we are supporters of free speech and post articles, documentaries, etc, that represent a wide cross section of ideas. See the Love For Life extensive research library where over 6000 documents, articles and videos are posted: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/82. We clearly see the evidence of the destruction to MAN and the earth that has been caused by ALL religions over the centuries and are therefore not supporters of religions, cults, sects or any group that demands conformity of thought, speech or action, or has rules, regulations or rituals that must be followed. Religions, nationalities and cultural "identities" are formed as a result of the brainwashing we receive from childhood. They are part of the tactics the Establishment uses to keep us all divided from one another and fighting one another.

All religions promote discrimination and division, leading to hatred and even violence and murder. None of them have yet to produce a remedy to all the suffering, poverty, unhappiness and discrimination in the world. If any religion truly had the remedy to all the suffering on earth, there would no longer be any suffering. What have Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, Judaism, atheism and the New Age done to end the suffering in the world?

Since December 2006, there have been many attempts to take down the Love For Life website. Any attempts have been thwarted by Love For Life supporters inundating the harm-doers with emails, etc, objecting to them taking down the website for a variety of reasons. The trouble makers usually back off when they realise that they can post all their views, arguments, beliefs, etc, in the Love For Life website without censorship or restriction imposed. They get to see that even the Queen, Pope, Prime Minister, President of America, etc, can post all their views without hindrance or sabotage and that we support freedom of speech/thought which means we support the right of all sides to express their views.

Of note, there is a vast amount of information posted in the Love For Life website which we do not agree with but we leave it all up because we refuse to be biased, opinionated or self-centered/self-serving. Of the many thousands of comments posted over the years we have only removed posts containing secret links to commercial advertisements, terrible foul language, threats of violence and death, etc, and attacks on other people's characters that avoid the subject/debate at hand. Besides links to advertisements, we have taken down less than six comments due to the above. We usually leave everything up, all warts and all, even those posts threatening to do terrible things to Fiona, our children, our dogs, our friends, family & supporters, etc.

The Love For Life website has information from all sides on many subjects, whether about Islam, Judaism, Christianity, Law, health, psychology, mind control, vaccination, aspartame, MSG, Chemtrails etc. There are over 11,000 articles, documentaries etc on the website and they are so diverse that we are sure that everyone would be able to find something they loved and something they hated, if they took the time to search. If we removed all the articles hated by everyone, there would probably be nothing left! We are not anti anyone but freedom of speech is freedom of speech and no one should condemn the work of another without taking the time to research the subject themselves. Yes, there are articles by those who have a less-than-rosy-viewpoint of Judaism, but there are also articles on the dark side of Tibetan Buddhism (and it is very dark) for those who are interested in the truth: Tibet - Buddhism - Dalai Lama: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6271 Should the authors of these articles be abused and imprisoned for daring to challenge the widely conceived reputation of Buddhism as being the religion of peace and love and that of the Dalai Lama as a saint, or should those interested be allowed to study the work and come to their own conclusions? The same applies to all the articles, documentaries, etc, about Christianity, Islam, Freemasonry, New World Order, etc.

The Love for Life website also shows how the Rule of Law, the Bar, the Government, the Monarchy, the system of commerce, the local, national and multi/trans-national private corporations, all the courses and careers on offer from our universities, all the educators, scientists, academics and experts, the aristocrats and the Establishment bloodlines have also done NOTHING to end the suffering in the world. The website maps the insanity of a world where there is no help for those in need, just as there was no help available for us when we were victims of terrible bank fraud: "NSW Supreme Court Case - Macquarie Bank/Perpetual Limited vs Fiona Cristian - Victims Of Bank Fraud Condoned By Judges" http://loveforlife.com.au/node/5 (orchestrated, condoned and protected by an international crime syndicate/terrorist organisation of judges, barristers, registrars, lawyers, politicians, banksters, big business representatives, media moguls and other lackeys who, all together, put up a wall of silence despite our trying many, many avenues. After the family home was stolen and business destroyed we were left close to poverty and destitution caring for 4 young daughters. Three years later not much has changed regardless of all our efforts. Where were all the followers of all the religions to help us? Or do we have to be members of those religions to receive help from others involved in them?

The New South Wales Jewish Board of Deputies accused us of being anti - Jewish, see: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6616 and http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6665 because we had posted an excerpt from James von Brun's book: Kill the Best Gentiles: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6054 in which he blames Jews for the problems of the world. Obviously this is not our view because of what we have stated above. We do not hate anyone, whatever religion they follow. We are always open to talk to any religious leader or politician and meet with any judge, member of the Bar, experts, academics, educators etc to share the remedy we offer that heals all the divisions between MAN and MAN, and MAN and the EARTH.

Today, a representative of the New South Wales Jewish Board of Deputies is threatening to close the website down, because they have decided it is anti - Jewish and that we promote racism. What has the New South Wales Jewish Board of Deputies done to end the suffering in the world? Can they show that they are concerned with the suffering of ALL men, women and children AND ARE SEEN TO BE DOING SOMETHING ABOUT IT or are they only concerned with Jewish affairs? If so, they, along with all the other religions that only care for their own, are part of the problem, not part of the solution. The man who rang Arthur today was only concerned with Jewish affairs; he was not interested in our intentions or in anybody else, just as most Christians, Muslims, Sikhs, Catholics, etc, are only interested in their own. While we separate ourselves into groups, dividing ourselves from others with rules, regulations, rituals, procedures and conditions, we will never solve our problems.

No matter what we in the Western World Civilisation of Commerce have been promised by our politicians, religious leaders, scientists, educators, philosophers, etc, for the past two hundred years, all we have seen is ever-increasing destruction of men, women and children and the earth. None of the so-called experts and leaders we have been taught to rely on are coming up with a solution and none of them are taking full-responsibility for the fact that they can't handle the problem. All religious books talk about end times full of destruction and suffering but why do we have to follow this program when there is an alternative to hatred, mayhem and death? Why are our leaders following the program of destruction and death rather than exploring the alternatives? It seems that any mainstream politician, priest or academic are only interested in supporting the RULES OF THE DIVIDE, that maintain the haves and the have nots. For 200+ years, 99% of the world population have been so trained to pass on their responsibility for themselves, others and the earth, that the 1% of the population that make up the leaders of the rest of us are making all the decisions leading to the destruction of all of us and the earth. Let's not forget the education system that brainwashes the 99% of the population that we are free and have equal rights while, in fact, we are feathering the nests of those at the top.

At the root of all our problems is self-centredness, an unwillingness nurtured by the Establishment that keeps us concerned only with our own needs rather than the needs of others around us and the Earth. Instead of creating and releasing acts of love for those around us as gifts to benefit them and the earth, we take, take and take, until there is nothing left. The whole point of the Love for Life website is to show people the root of all our problems and to share the remedy. The extensive research library is there to attract browsers and to provide access to information not available through mainstream channels. If the New South Wales Jewish Board of Deputies can, after careful examination of our work, prove that anything we are saying is wrong, we will be happy to accept their proof. If they cannot, and they are still insistent on closing the website down, they will be showing themselves to be traitors to MAN because they are not interested in pursuing any avenue that can end the suffering in the world.

All religions, corporations and organisations that support and maintain the Western World Civilisation of Commerce are part of the problem because our civilisation is a world of haves and have nots, racism, violence, hatred, poverty, sickness, discrimination, abuse, starvation, homelessness, corruption, collusion, vindictiveness, social unrest, arrogance, ignorance, fear, war and chaos. While we support civilisation, we support death and destruction because ALL civilisations that have ever existed are apocalyptic by design.

If we truly want peace on earth and freedom for all, we have to let go of all that which keeps us divided, and come together as MAN, conscious living co-creators of creation. The Love For Life website offers a remedy to the problems we all face in the form of DO NO HARM COMMUNITIES: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/3641 For more details see here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/6511 and here: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/3385 - We also highly recommend that everyone read the brilliant Russian books called The Ringing Cedars: http://loveforlife.com.au/node/1125 - The Love For Life Website Homepage also provides lots of inspiring remedy based information: http://loveforlife.com.au - If you want to be kept up to date with our work please register to the Love For Life Mailing List here: http://loveforlife.com.au/content/09/05/14/mailing-list. We usually send two postings per month. Presently (September 2011) there are over 7000 registrations reaching over 500,000 readers across Earth. The website now (September 2011) receives up to 12 million hits per month. Since December 2006, over 100 million people have visited the Love For Life website.

Conscious Love Always
Arthur and Fiona Cristian
Love For Life
17th June 2009

The Cristian Family November 2006

Clarification Regarding Our Intentions
Behind The Use Of Donations

The Love For Life website is offered for free without a fee and without any conditions attached. If people are inspired to donate money, then we accept their gift and have provided an avenue for them to support the work we do through Fiona's Paypal or ANZ bank account http://loveforlife.com.au/node/8515. There is no obligation whatsoever to donate and all are equally welcome to our work and to our "time", whether they donate or not. Over the last 9 years, all the Love For Life work has been put out for free and it has often been donations from supporters that have enabled us to renew the domain name, etc, to keep the website going. While some complain that we have an avenue for donations, others complained when we didn't! Either use it or don't - the choice is yours.

Since Love For Life started March 2005 and website December 2006, Arthur has worked 16 hours a day, 7 days a week unpaid for much of this period, putting together the website and sharing insights to wake people up to what has been done to them, whether through the 11,500+ individual articles, videos, podcasts, debates, discussions, pdf's, research documents, etc, found amongst the 8,500+ posts, as well as helping many, many men and women over the phone, and through email, website correspondence, Facebook and YouTube, and creating the Love For Life food forest vege garden and Love For Life music recording studio. This is our life is a gift commitment to serve MAN/Nature/Earth but we are still severely compromised by "The System" and still have to give to Caesar what is claimed to belong to Caesar, which is where the donations help us.

Fiona & Arthur Cristian
Love For Life
21st July 2014